Why break it into 3 words like it in now. Go oldschool and use keywords. google -> 74.125.45.100 instead of www.google.com -> 74.125.45.100
If tlds can be anything and subdomains are also free reign.... Whats the point? Maybe if they were manually given out or some had different rules but that's not happening so. I don't get it.
Itsatrap. All it would do is make the porn industry an easy target. Plus there would be a big push to get all porn crammed into the.xxx tld. And there are legit sites... wired.com links to things with nudity. Omg wikipedia has nudity on it. If an xxx domain is created people will try to force all nudity onto it which isn't feasible.
Whats even more fun then what you suggest is having invisible elements with typical form names. Autofill on people's browsers fill it in. You can^H^Hould steal all kinds of information (mostly email address'), even username/passwords for some sites if they identify their forms in a weird way. By weird way I mean the exact same way you do for your site. Cool implementing a hack that only involves html tags.
Followed by 10000 yes we cans. So at least he views the fear as something overcome-able. bush admin was like we are all to live in constant fear forever! Well not so much the bush admin as fox news and friends but then fox anchors get promoted directly into bush government. The whole thing is annoying, america needs to get over its teenage angst.
Uhhh during 9/11 Bush's father was meeting with osama's father. George was in a meeting with them the night before. The bush's and the bin ladens had very close ties. I dunno what you've been smoking.
The value of 10days of music versus 20days is not twice as much. This should be reflected. If I listen to 3hours of music a day with 10,000 or 100,000songs my enjoyment only increases marginally.
If you think about it like a radio station it makes more sense. E-radio stations are charged per song they play. That price is based on number of listeners. So with an infinite number of songs available (like a radio station) paying to broadcast to an audience of 1 (me). It would probably cost me something like 2$ a month if i listened 5hrs/day (I'd pay 5~10x that). With INFINITE music available. Explain why this isn't available. I mean I suppose I could try to actually set up an e-radio with 1 listener and negotiate deals with record companies but that seems needlessly difficult.
HAHA cancer gets i'm sure thousands of times the budget this gets. Giving it another extra.01% of funding wont change shit. This also has more exciting implications than cancer immunity.
Sounds like a strawman... or like a whole field of strawmen. If you do something evil and fucking kim jong il says thats not right DOES NOT make it ok. It just means that kim jong il can occasionally be correct.
It is something like aiding and abetting after the fact i suppose. And there is no way the criminal will get charged. So sorta like aiding and abetting a dead person.
Agreed, GP is insane if he thinks this is useless. Replacement bodyparts early on we could replace eyes. Later on maybe we could extend the brain (add external storage). But this is useful in getting people to accept artificial limbs. We could build the matrix even if it is shitty at first. Understanding our brains is understanding ourselves. This never hurts! We could look at how information is routed and exploit it. We have some things like mnemonics. But with greater specifics we can get ourselves to think smarter (by that i mean do the act of thinking smarter, more efficiently). There are numerous applications for a map of the brain.
SUVs aren't necessary anywhere. And the number of trucks in the us:the number needed is like 15:1. And I know about the stereotyping. I was mostly just playing devils advocate on this one. I do though think both sides in the end would support the auto bailout. Why? Because there are enough truck lovers out there to save it. The pickup is a symbol of america as much so as apple pie or... baseball? If you think there is a lot of support for NRA that's nothing compared to the support you'd find for very large vehicles.
Uhh the right-wing supports GM more than the left. Though the left may be more spending happy. The right get weepy when they talk about their truck. And trucks are a symbol of 'merrrica which the right get very defensive over. They'd spend the money.
Anyways ignoring my personal political alignment the idea holds true. If the vote comes up and only evil, lesserevil have a shot at winning there is only one sensible choice. UNLESS of course you are a chaotic neutral warlock. Then you just sacrifice a goat and mind control who-ever wins.
Uhh personally i think no matter what that would be a wasted vote. BUT if you are a right winger. Then a vote for mccain would have been smarter then a vote for.... w/e independent right-wing person you prefer.
He set a timeline to shutdown gitmo in 1 year. Stopped torture that was going on. Allowed government to support abortions. Explained that the US is not at war with Islam. Brought closer ties to Europe and the globe merely by being closer to the global center (US left). Strict lobbyist rules were made. Well... comparatively strict. (doesn't allow you to make desicions about things you lobbied for in past, no gift-giving, no jumping from government into a bussiness thats lobbying you). Made an order for higher fuel efficiency standards in vehicles. Opened up whitehouse.gov to have a more open converstation between the government and its people. Or barring that a very clear layout on plans, ideas and keeping the public informed. There was also some thing about whitehouse transperency.. saving letters or somesuch.
Oh and that was week 1. He's not perfect but dear god think if it was McCain. Oh and he spoke to leaders on both sides of the good/evil barrier.
Well for the companies; they did something illegal. buuuut the government told them to do it. So, they can't exactly sue them after. I think that qualifies as entrapment of some sort. Also I think Bush should be jailed over it. Obama may be being stupid about it but he wasn't the president when the crime was committed....
EXACTLY! Someone give this man a mod point. I'm pretty sure the 'they are both evil' thing is pushed by the Reps so that the Dems will vote for third parties and weaken their vote.
Option 1: You vote for a third party that truly represents you, they get 1% of the vote, the guys you hated win. Next year there is a repeat of the exact same thing maybe you gain a percent. Eventually with enough fighting you can win the party you wanted.
Option 2: You vote for the lesser evil. (Obama has done A LOT of good and reversed many of the horrible mistakes Bush made already, even in the first weeks). You get some things you wanted some things you didnt. The guy you hate does not come in power. Next year to be more competitive both sides push more to your side (clearly left in my case as i'm not from the us). So each year you get parties that are closer to what you wanted.
End result in 50years? Essentially the same thing. But with option 2 you spent 50 years with the lesser evil the whole time.
Slashdot Mirror
Why break it into 3 words like it in now. Go oldschool and use keywords.
google -> 74.125.45.100 instead of
www.google.com -> 74.125.45.100
If tlds can be anything and subdomains are also free reign.... Whats the point? Maybe if they were manually given out or some had different rules but that's not happening so. I don't get it.
Itsatrap. All it would do is make the porn industry an easy target. Plus there would be a big push to get all porn crammed into the .xxx tld. And there are legit sites... wired.com links to things with nudity. Omg wikipedia has nudity on it. If an xxx domain is created people will try to force all nudity onto it which isn't feasible.
Whats even more fun then what you suggest is having invisible elements with typical form names. Autofill on people's browsers fill it in. You can^H^Hould steal all kinds of information (mostly email address'), even username/passwords for some sites if they identify their forms in a weird way. By weird way I mean the exact same way you do for your site. Cool implementing a hack that only involves html tags.
Go for a !funny tag? or... peoplearejerkfaces
Temporary.
People selling organs could already do that. It just makes the storage space needed smaller.
Followed by 10000 yes we cans. So at least he views the fear as something overcome-able. bush admin was like we are all to live in constant fear forever! Well not so much the bush admin as fox news and friends but then fox anchors get promoted directly into bush government. The whole thing is annoying, america needs to get over its teenage angst.
Uhhh during 9/11 Bush's father was meeting with osama's father. George was in a meeting with them the night before. The bush's and the bin ladens had very close ties. I dunno what you've been smoking.
Isn't format shifting illegal anyways?
The value of 10days of music versus 20days is not twice as much. This should be reflected. If I listen to 3hours of music a day with 10,000 or 100,000songs my enjoyment only increases marginally.
If you think about it like a radio station it makes more sense. E-radio stations are charged per song they play. That price is based on number of listeners. So with an infinite number of songs available (like a radio station) paying to broadcast to an audience of 1 (me). It would probably cost me something like 2$ a month if i listened 5hrs/day (I'd pay 5~10x that). With INFINITE music available. Explain why this isn't available. I mean I suppose I could try to actually set up an e-radio with 1 listener and negotiate deals with record companies but that seems needlessly difficult.
HAHA cancer gets i'm sure thousands of times the budget this gets. Giving it another extra .01% of funding wont change shit. This also has more exciting implications than cancer immunity.
Sounds like a strawman... or like a whole field of strawmen. If you do something evil and fucking kim jong il says thats not right DOES NOT make it ok. It just means that kim jong il can occasionally be correct.
It is something like aiding and abetting after the fact i suppose. And there is no way the criminal will get charged. So sorta like aiding and abetting a dead person.
I think he was comparing mccain to bush not obama. And he's probably right, even mccain couldnt fuck up as badly as bush.
If we learn enough about the brain you could get a button that causes you to have an unending orgasm...
Agreed, GP is insane if he thinks this is useless. Replacement bodyparts early on we could replace eyes. Later on maybe we could extend the brain (add external storage). But this is useful in getting people to accept artificial limbs. We could build the matrix even if it is shitty at first. Understanding our brains is understanding ourselves. This never hurts! We could look at how information is routed and exploit it. We have some things like mnemonics. But with greater specifics we can get ourselves to think smarter (by that i mean do the act of thinking smarter, more efficiently). There are numerous applications for a map of the brain.
SUVs aren't necessary anywhere. And the number of trucks in the us:the number needed is like 15:1. And I know about the stereotyping. I was mostly just playing devils advocate on this one. I do though think both sides in the end would support the auto bailout. Why? Because there are enough truck lovers out there to save it. The pickup is a symbol of america as much so as apple pie or... baseball? If you think there is a lot of support for NRA that's nothing compared to the support you'd find for very large vehicles.
Uhh the right-wing supports GM more than the left. Though the left may be more spending happy. The right get weepy when they talk about their truck. And trucks are a symbol of 'merrrica which the right get very defensive over. They'd spend the money.
Anyways ignoring my personal political alignment the idea holds true. If the vote comes up and only evil, lesserevil have a shot at winning there is only one sensible choice. UNLESS of course you are a chaotic neutral warlock. Then you just sacrifice a goat and mind control who-ever wins.
Agreed. If the vote isn't close in your riding then vote for whoever you like. I'm an idiot for not mentioning that. If it is:
48%evil 48%lesserevil 4%indy
I'll be voting for lesserevil thank you very much.
COMPROMISE! It isn't a bad thing.
Uhh personally i think no matter what that would be a wasted vote. BUT if you are a right winger. Then a vote for mccain would have been smarter then a vote for.... w/e independent right-wing person you prefer.
He set a timeline to shutdown gitmo in 1 year. Stopped torture that was going on. Allowed government to support abortions. Explained that the US is not at war with Islam. Brought closer ties to Europe and the globe merely by being closer to the global center (US left). Strict lobbyist rules were made. Well... comparatively strict. (doesn't allow you to make desicions about things you lobbied for in past, no gift-giving, no jumping from government into a bussiness thats lobbying you). Made an order for higher fuel efficiency standards in vehicles. Opened up whitehouse.gov to have a more open converstation between the government and its people. Or barring that a very clear layout on plans, ideas and keeping the public informed. There was also some thing about whitehouse transperency .. saving letters or somesuch.
Oh and that was week 1. He's not perfect but dear god think if it was McCain. Oh and he spoke to leaders on both sides of the good/evil barrier.
Well for the companies; they did something illegal. buuuut the government told them to do it. So, they can't exactly sue them after. I think that qualifies as entrapment of some sort. Also I think Bush should be jailed over it. Obama may be being stupid about it but he wasn't the president when the crime was committed....
EXACTLY! Someone give this man a mod point. I'm pretty sure the 'they are both evil' thing is pushed by the Reps so that the Dems will vote for third parties and weaken their vote.
Option 1: You vote for a third party that truly represents you, they get 1% of the vote, the guys you hated win. Next year there is a repeat of the exact same thing maybe you gain a percent. Eventually with enough fighting you can win the party you wanted.
Option 2: You vote for the lesser evil. (Obama has done A LOT of good and reversed many of the horrible mistakes Bush made already, even in the first weeks). You get some things you wanted some things you didnt. The guy you hate does not come in power. Next year to be more competitive both sides push more to your side (clearly left in my case as i'm not from the us). So each year you get parties that are closer to what you wanted.
End result in 50years? Essentially the same thing. But with option 2 you spent 50 years with the lesser evil the whole time.
If AP dies will a new variety of news sources pop up? Or will all news that needs investigative journalism die?