OK, Perhaps the buyer was way over the top with his web blog. It doesn't change the fact that Amir had the opportunity to do the right thing in the first place and circumvent all the resulting hassle. Surely he is responsible to provide a working, as advertised (memory) laptop, if not legally but certainly morally (at least according to all the "Good" books). After all we are talking Karma here.
First off you don't know that the buyer didn't go to the police. Second, he broke no laws in posting the contents of the laptop. He (the buyer) is to be appluded in showing restraint in not publishing the Mothers details. Amir needs to pay the buyer back.
Slashdot Mirror
OK, Perhaps the buyer was way over the top with his web blog. It doesn't change the fact that Amir had the opportunity to do the right thing in the first place and circumvent all the resulting hassle. Surely he is responsible to provide a working, as advertised (memory) laptop, if not legally but certainly morally (at least according to all the "Good" books). After all we are talking Karma here.
First off you don't know that the buyer didn't go to the police. Second, he broke no laws in posting the contents of the laptop. He (the buyer) is to be appluded in showing restraint in not publishing the Mothers details. Amir needs to pay the buyer back.