Slashdot Mirror


Online Revenge

Many people have submitted this story of a broken laptop purchased on e-bay. The buyer gives a little lesson on why you should always clean your hard drive before you sell a computer.

645 comments

  1. Not so funny when/if the seller commits suicide by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Everyone is having a nice laugh right now, but it won't seem so funny if this guy commits suicide. Then we'll be reading about how the 'buyer' is on trial.

    1. Re:Not so funny when/if the seller commits suicide by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      +1 funny

    2. Re:Not so funny when/if the seller commits suicide by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bah, nonsense. It would still be funny if he offed himself. Get him outta the gene pool, I say. I mean, if he can't take responsibility for his actions then why should it matter if he committed suicide. Either way he's a loser.

    3. Re:Not so funny when/if the seller commits suicide by jlarocco · · Score: 5, Funny
      Everyone is having a nice laugh right now, but it won't seem so funny if this guy commits suicide.

      I believe the word for that would be "hilarious."

    4. Re:Not so funny when/if the seller commits suicide by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It was funny when Bush choked on a pretzel. If he'd died from it, it would still be morbidly funny.

    5. Re:Not so funny when/if the seller commits suicide by raoul666 · · Score: 1

      Everyone is having a nice laugh right now, but it won't seem so funny if this guy commits suicide. Then we'll be reading about how the 'buyer' is on trial.

      For what?

      --
      When cryptography is outlawed, bayl bhgynjf jvyy unir cevinpl
    6. Re:Not so funny when/if the seller commits suicide by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hi, Amir.

    7. Re:Not so funny when/if the seller commits suicide by mwvdlee · · Score: 1

      Yes, it would suck if the buyer had to go on trial.

      --
      Slashdot social media options: AIM, ICQ, Yahoo, Jabber and Mobile Text. Why no MySpace?
    8. Re:Not so funny when/if the seller commits suicide by ah802 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The presumption for that, is this seller is 'honourable','respectable', and didn't sell a dead laptop with inflated specs. The images on this system clearly show otherwise and there is legal redress if he feels that he has been wronged... the truth can hurt.

    9. Re:Not so funny when/if the seller commits suicide by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not having read the frigging article, i must ask: Is it possible that this laptop was stolen and that the victim, now is a DOUBLE victim???

    10. Re:Not so funny when/if the seller commits suicide by fm6 · · Score: 2, Informative

      If Amir kills himself, the guy who posted the photos might feel bad about it. But face trial? What law has he broken?

    11. Re:Not so funny when/if the seller commits suicide by HeX314 · · Score: 1

      Even better, the victim could one-up the aggressor and fake his own death to look like a hate crime with the aggressor tied in somehow. Insert clever plot-tie-in, and you have yourselves a mystery thriller that puts the aggressor in trial. Maybe...

    12. Re:Not so funny when/if the seller commits suicide by DrSkwid · · Score: 3, Insightful

      That would be as funny as Gary Glitter ending up being shot in Thailand for fucking children after fleeing the UK after his prison spell resulting from taking his PC into a computer shop and the assistant invading his privacy and finding child porn.

      The Thai's spolied a good laugh by letting him off with a fine, spoilsports!

      --
      There are places where the networks are not touching,and there are places where they are-Boeing's Lori Gunter
    13. Re:Not so funny when/if the seller commits suicide by jlarocco · · Score: 2, Insightful
      You, sir, are an asshole.

      And you, sir, have no sense of humor and exaggerated self-importance.

      Around 150,000 people die every single day. In the 5 minutes it will take me to post this, 500 people around the world will die. With all those people dying, I don't feel bad when one of them does it in a way I find amusing. In the grand scheme of things, a single person dying isn't that important.

    14. Re:Not so funny when/if the seller commits suicide by lendude · · Score: 1

      I believe the word for that would be ironically hilarious!

      --
      "Get off the cross - we need the wood" - Tori Amos
    15. Re:Not so funny when/if the seller commits suicide by mgabrys_sf · · Score: 1

      Someone killing themselves is not a criminal offense for others but only for the "suicider" if they involve public places like famous bridges and what-not. Of course I don't know anyone who was ticketed after they were dead...

      Otherwise is a laugh-riot for the pathos / schedenfreude set. Perhaps we could mail him some bullets? Of course we can't include a note because that could be contituted at a threat - and that's illegal of course.

      If the thin skinned want to bleed to death in the rain - then let them and cull the heard for Darwin's sake.

    16. Re:Not so funny when/if the seller commits suicide by servognome · · Score: 2, Informative

      If Amir kills himself, the guy who posted the photos might feel bad about it. But face trial? What law has he broken?
       
      A wrongful death civil suit from the guy's family. There is a chance if they show what the buyer did was extraordinarily malicious, a jury could find him at fault for provoking the death.
      Not saying that it is right, just that it could happen.

      --
      D6 63 0D 70 89 81 BB 8E 7B 7C 5F 5D 54 EA AB 73
    17. Re:Not so funny when/if the seller commits suicide by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Please post your name, and I'll be sure to tell your family and friends that when you kick the bucket.

      Oh, how I'll laugh.

      Here's a tip fuckwit - humanity is based on something called empathy. If you ever manage to graduate high school and actually become an adult, you may begin to learn that.

      Geez, what a tosser.

    18. Re:Not so funny when/if the seller commits suicide by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      no, he claimed that he had moved and made the transfers and stuff under his own name

    19. Re:Not so funny when/if the seller commits suicide by cp.tar · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      After all, he is a Muslim. He might blow himself up, and then what? He could get sued for inciting terrorism.

      Sorry, did I say sued? I meant, transported to Guantanamo.

      </sarcasm>

      --
      Ignore this signature. By order.
    20. Re:Not so funny when/if the seller commits suicide by HuguesT · · Score: 1

      Harassment.

    21. Re:Not so funny when/if the seller commits suicide by Bloke+down+the+pub · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yeah, it's not like he's committed a serious offence like saying that a police horse was gay or anything.

      --
      It's true I tell you, feller at work's next door neighbour read it in the paper.
    22. Re:Not so funny when/if the seller commits suicide by Errtu76 · · Score: 0

      No sense of humor because that person didn't find it funny when another human being dies? Hmmm ... I fail to see how this can be a case of exaggerated self-importance either, but okay. It's good to see this comment was moderated as Interesting, because that it is indeed. Among a whole lot of other things Slashdot unfortunately has no way of moderating. In the grand scheme of 'things' (nicely said), it most certainly does matter if a single person dies. Just because it's nobody related to you doesn't mean it's not important. I think by making this comment, you yourself have proven to have an exaggerated self-importance.

    23. Re:Not so funny when/if the seller commits suicide by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "I believe the word for that would be "hilarious.""

      Dude! I'm so with you on that! Who cares if he kills himself? Serves him right for trying to screw a guy over by selling a broken laptop. Trust me, if I had bought that laptop I'd do the same thing! He deserves everything he's getting. Since when should we feel sorry for scammers? I sure don't.

      If he kills himself, that's one less scammer we have to worry about on ebay! ;)

    24. Re:Not so funny when/if the seller commits suicide by jimbolaya · · Score: 1

      I'm not aware of anyone who has blown himself up who has either been sued or transported to Guantanamo.

      --

      There ain't no rules here; we're trying to accomplish something.

    25. Re:Not so funny when/if the seller commits suicide by Crizp · · Score: 1
      Indeed. If you're going to put child porn on a computer, at least encrypt it. I'm not going to say anything bad about people who just look at pictures: at least if they're getting their filthy little rocks off into a box of Kleenex, I know my kids are safe.

      Safe from him, yes, but what about the people who make the pictures he's fappin' to? The images have to be made by someone, and they might as well nap your kids.

    26. Re:Not so funny when/if the seller commits suicide by ArsenneLupin · · Score: 0, Troll
      ever hear of natural selection....

      Would have been funny if the Pretzel had succeeded in Bush's case:
      Natural selection fixes consequence of unnatural election...

    27. Re:Not so funny when/if the seller commits suicide by cp.tar · · Score: 0

      Well, duh!

      But the buyer could be accused of indirect terrorist action.

      Damn, I should be a politician...

      --
      Ignore this signature. By order.
    28. Re:Not so funny when/if the seller commits suicide by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      The funny thing was not that someone dies, but the way in which someone dies. There's no use denying that sometimes tragic things happen by a funny accident, and in those cases I think it is perfectly okay to make jokes about it, as long as you don't directly joke about the death itself. It's even possible to feel sorry and still make jokes. Maybe this is not a most perfect example of "tragic thing by funny accident", but still it's not so serious.

    29. Re:Not so funny when/if the seller commits suicide by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Here's a tip fuckwit - humanity is based on something called empathy. If you ever manage to graduate high school and actually become an adult, you may begin to learn that.


      What a remarkably weak grasp of reality. By the time you're an adult, if you've not seen enough evidence that the vast majority of humanity is entirely undeserving of anything approaching "empathy," then you must be either hopelessly naive or severely learning impaired.

      There are some people who have no place in a healthy society, and should not be mourned. People who make a living ripping other people off are in this group.

    30. Re:Not so funny when/if the seller commits suicide by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nah, would still laugh... Probaly even more.

    31. Re:Not so funny when/if the seller commits suicide by IngramJames · · Score: 1

      I'm not aware of anyone who has blown himself up who has either been sued or transported to Guantanamo.

      It's the other way around. First you get transported to Guantanamo, then you get blown up. Or is it beaten up? I forget. And it's not like Habeas Corpus applies so that anyone can check..

      You don't get arrested first, though - that would imply a crimminal action, and you'd have rights to a lawyer and a trial. So you have to be detained by troops. But not in a way that invokes the international laws regarding people captured by troops. No, you get detained in a magic way.

      --
      'No rational religion claims "supernatural" exists, that's an atheist slander.' - seen on slashdot.
    32. Re:Not so funny when/if the seller commits suicide by ZeroExistenZ · · Score: 1
      After all, he is a Muslim. He might blow himself up, and then what? He could get sued for inciting terrorism.

      As a matter of fact, at first the blog had pictures of 9/11 attacks and the metro bombings supposedly from the laptop indicating enthousiasm for these events. People suggested in comments on the blog to inform instance to have the guy locked away for perving and terroristic idealism.

      --
      I think we can keep recursing like this until someone returns 1
    33. Re:Not so funny when/if the seller commits suicide by thc69 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Huh?

      Why would he commit suicide?

      Have you looked at the pictures on the blog? I saw some that I found icky -- but nothing severely embarassing. I mean, the gay pic is gross (although possibly taken out of context -- one occasionally winds up with that sort of stuff when, for example, using an automated usenet binary leeching program on a straight newsfroup, or as part of a supposedly straight series), and the foot thing is yucky, but if he doesn't find those to be a turnoff, then what's the problem? The pictures that appear to be leg shots on public transporation could possibly get him in trouble if perpetrator, location, intent, and unwillingness of participants can be proven; and all of it is sure to get him some teasing from his friends either way.

      Anyway, this is what happens when jerk A meets jerk B. From sources linked in this discussion, I gather that the following happened:

      1. Jerk A advertises item with 2gb RAM and a DVD-RW drive, but ships with 512mb and no DVD-RW. The Register's article did not say anything about him denying that. Perhaps it was working when he shipped it, but considering that he failed to erase his potentially embarassing pictures, I'd guess that it wasn't (and that he's not saavy enough to remove the hard drive and wipe it on another machine).

      2. Jerk B is angry, and does not respect existing dispute processes enough to really make an effort to follow through. Maybe he sent some "polite messages" and was told that the seller moved far away, maybe not, but this sort of revenge deserves all other avenues to be completely explored first.

      Don't forget another possibility -- maybe Jerk B fabricated most of it...but he'd have to be a Major Super Mega Jerk to do all that if Jerk A is completely innocent too.

      --
      Procrastination -- because good things come to those who wait.
    34. Re:Not so funny when/if the seller commits suicide by indifferent+children · · Score: 1

      Sorry, we already have one babbling, incoherent politician. I hear Dell tech support is hiring.

      --
      Censorship is telling a man he can't have a steak just because a baby can't chew it. --Mark Twain
    35. Re:Not so funny when/if the seller commits suicide by HaydnH · · Score: 1

      Errr... the buyer is the one on trial already!

      --
      Time is an illusion. Lunchtime doubly so. - Douglas Adams
    36. Re:Not so funny when/if the seller commits suicide by Nutria · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Would have been funny if the Pretzel had succeeded in Bush's case:
      Natural selection fixes consequence of unnatural election...


      Won't you people ever give that a rest? 6 years is long time to be whining about your guy losing a close election.

      --
      "I don't know, therefore Aliens" Wafflebox1
    37. Re:Not so funny when/if the seller commits suicide by Deliveranc3 · · Score: 1

      Venue Britain, they are slightly more sane there.

      Amir commited fraud, I'm pretty sure his funds should be tied up in a criminal case.

    38. Re:Not so funny when/if the seller commits suicide by ArsenneLupin · · Score: 0, Offtopic
      Won't you people ever give that a rest? 6 years is long time to be whining about your guy losing a close election.

      There was another Diebolded election just 2 years ago...

    39. Re:Not so funny when/if the seller commits suicide by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      lol hax!

    40. Re:Not so funny when/if the seller commits suicide by MrBlue+VT · · Score: 1

      Nobody seems to have thought of the fact that the laptop might have been stolen from the original owner by the ebay seller. It seems to me if the seller has no problem ripping people off on ebay, he would have no problem stealing a laptop from somebody in a coffee shop or robbing it from their house.

      The buyer goes on a big vigilante streak, how do we know he's even targeting the correct guy? I'm waiting for the follow-up story in a month that says the original owner is sueing the buyer because the laptop was stolen from him by the seller.

    41. Re:Not so funny when/if the seller commits suicide by Pig+Hogger · · Score: 1
      but it won't seem so funny if this guy commits suicide.
      So what? The guy is iranian, so he'll get his 72 virgins.
    42. Re:Not so funny when/if the seller commits suicide by teromajusa · · Score: 2, Insightful

      No chance of that. If the original owner is not Amir, he has nothing to complain about (except the theft itself) since its not his info thats posted on the internet. If Amir is the original owner and the laptop was stolen from him by some 3rd party and sold on ebay, Amir would be telling people that instead of claiming it worked when he sold it.

    43. Re:Not so funny when/if the seller commits suicide by drewsome · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      six years is a long time to watch my country be destroyed, too.

    44. Re:Not so funny when/if the seller commits suicide by Captain+Splendid · · Score: 1

      Well, if you RTFA, you'd see that the seller does indeed seem to be the original owner of the laptop.

      --
      Linux, you magnificent bastard, I read the fucking manual!
    45. Re:Not so funny when/if the seller commits suicide by stankulp · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      "There was another Diebolded election just 2 years ago..."

      Depending on how selective your memory is, you might remember that ALGORE CONCEDED DEFEAT IN 2000 BEFORE CHANGING HIS MIND.

      The fact of the matter is that the margin of victory in the Florida presidential election was smaller than the margin of error. Algore's advisors convinced him that all he had to do was manufacture a few hundred votes in a recount of hanging chads and he could manufacture a win.

      HOW GEORGE BUSH STOLE ELECTION 2000

      "Al, this is David Boies of Boies, Schiller & Flexner LLP, America's richest trial lawyers. I apologize for calling so late, but this won't wait."

      "Look, I know you've already conceded, but I've been talking to some folks in Florida and they think they can find enough extra votes down there to give you the state in a recount."

      "Just a recount in Volusia, Palm Beach, Broward, and Miami-Dade counties, though."

      "If it goes statewide our people will be spread too thin to keep things under control."

      "Do you want to give it a try? At this point you've got nothing to lose."

      "That's great, Al. I'll give 'em a call and we'll get this show on the road."

      "Call Bush right away to let him know you've changed your mind."

      "On second thought, call a press conference first."

      "Talk to you later, Mr. President."

      --
      We must be alert to the danger that public policy could become captive to a scientific-technological elite. - Eisenhower
    46. Re:Not so funny when/if the seller commits suicide by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Which one? USA, UK, Iraq or Afghanistan? I might concede that Afghanistan was already completely fucked, of course.

    47. Re:Not so funny when/if the seller commits suicide by AcidLacedPenguiN · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If the original owner was foolish enought to leave skivvy shots and gay porn on the hard drive, then he deserves to get owned like that.

      --
      disclaimer: I've been known to store numbers in my ass for which to dig out when quantities are required.
    48. Re:Not so funny when/if the seller commits suicide by orkysoft · · Score: 1

      Right, and it was the charger that got stolen, and not the other way around, huh?

      --

      I suffer from attention surplus disorder.
    49. Re:Not so funny when/if the seller commits suicide by gb506 · · Score: 1
      six years is a long time to watch my country be destroyed, too.

      Yeah, what with the reinstatement of the draft, six years of negative GDP growth, double-digit interest rates, crushing inflation, skyrocketing violent crime, the rapidly increasing scarcity of clean drinking water, and those pesky zombies rising from the grave... Oh, wait...

      What alternative universe are you living in, dude? You want to see a country being destroyed, sashay on down to South Africa or Zimbabwe. I suppose you're the guy that bitches and rants about $2.85 per gallon gasoline while sipping on the $2.00 per liter bottle of Evian?

    50. Re:Not so funny when/if the seller commits suicide by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 3, Funny

      > So what? The guy is iranian, so he'll get his 72 virgins.

      Mmmmmm...720 creamy, succulent tootsies...

      --
      (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
    51. Re:Not so funny when/if the seller commits suicide by Damvan · · Score: 1

      Do you honestly think the Republicans would give it a rest if the election went the other way?

    52. Re:Not so funny when/if the seller commits suicide by gb506 · · Score: 1
      Do you honestly think the Republicans would give it a rest if the election went the other way?

      Considering that they're generally not the ones slashing get-out-the-vote van tires, shooting out the windows of rival campaign offices (also happened in Huntinton, WV, BTW), I'd guess that, yes, the GOP would likely be more civil. Crap, even Nixon declined to challenge the 1960 election even though his case would have been far more believeable than Gore's.

      Take a stroll through DU to see just how crazed and freakish your side is. All that seething has to be tiring.

    53. Re:Not so funny when/if the seller commits suicide by XenoRyet · · Score: 1
      Clearly you are missing the point.

      When I die, people close to me will be sad. Just as I will be sad if someone close to me dies. If I should happen to die in some comical fasion that random people can gleen some amusement from, I would fully expect my family to be sad, and random strangers to laugh. I don't see a problem there.

      The death of a random stranger you heard about on the internet doesn't affect you one whit. You didn't know him yesterday, so what is the point in mourning a loss that you didn't experience. React to the information as you see fit. Laugh if it's funny, don't if it's not. There is no moral or ethical stand to be taken in reacting to the death of someone that has zero connection to your life. As someone above posted, people die constantly, and life goes on. When it happens to me, I won't expect the whole world to mourn me.

      --
      If forums teach us anything, it is that logic and critical thinking should be required courses in the public schools.
    54. Re:Not so funny when/if the seller commits suicide by iminplaya · · Score: 1

      It took you five minutes to post that? You might want to check one of those typing tutor programs.

      In the grand scheme of things, a single person dying isn't that important.

      In the grand scheme of things, the destruction of the planet or even the entire galaxy isn't that important.

      --
      What?
    55. Re:Not so funny when/if the seller commits suicide by Beyond_GoodandEvil · · Score: 1

      But not in a way that invokes the international laws regarding people captured by troops. No, you get detained in a magic way.

      The magic way is the occupying/invading army puts a bounty on foreign nationals/terrorists, the locals then grab you while "visiting" for a "wedding", and turn you over to the occupying force. See in this way you aren't captured by troops, but vigilantes. The citizens who turn you over(tied up in a sack no doubt) get a big fat check, and the occupying army gets to separate the wheat from the chaff.

      --
      I laughed at the weak who considered themselves good because they lacked claws.
    56. Re:Not so funny when/if the seller commits suicide by jimbolaya · · Score: 1
      Sorry, we already have one babbling, incoherent politician. I hear Dell tech support is hiring.

      Just one? I wanna move where you live.

      --

      There ain't no rules here; we're trying to accomplish something.

    57. Re:Not so funny when/if the seller commits suicide by drewsome · · Score: 0

      no, I'm the guy that bitches and rants about billions being spent on space lasers as our schools crumble. I'm the guy that bitches and rants about the methodical shredding of the Constitution and Bill of Rights. I'm the guy who bitches and rants about the lies and the deceit and the racism and the hatred and the sheer stupidity.

    58. Re:Not so funny when/if the seller commits suicide by drewsome · · Score: 0

      darn buttons...

      no, I'm the guy that bitches and rants about billions being spent on space lasers as our schools crumble. I'm the guy that bitches and rants about the methodical shredding of the Constitution and Bill of Rights. I'm the guy who bitches and rants about the lies and the deceit and the racism and the hatred and the sheer stupidity that the current administration is foisting on us. I drink my water out of the tap, and I drive a small, efficient car that gets over 30 miles to the gallon, and I wish the government would stop subsidizing the oil industry.

    59. Re:Not so funny when/if the seller commits suicide by Nutria · · Score: 1

      I drink my water out of the tap,

      Yuk. Tap water is nasty.

      and I drive a small, efficient car

      And when your small, efficient car smashes into a tree, it'll be a small, efficient blood pancake.

      --
      "I don't know, therefore Aliens" Wafflebox1
    60. Re:Not so funny when/if the seller commits suicide by Darby · · Score: 1

      Take a stroll through DU [democratic...ground.com] to see just how crazed and freakish your side is.

      Says the person whose "side" stands for illegal torture and murder camps, Big Brother unconstitutional wiretaps, and making up stupid easily blown lies in order to start a war to make a few traitors rich by robbing the rest of the country.

      Yeah, Sparky. You're really a good and moral person.
      This idiotic Republican strategy of attacking the "other side" constantly while they are far and away he most corrupt institution in the history of the country really gets tiring.
      At least it does hilight the extreme level of delusion that is an absolute requirement for supporting your party.

      The Democrats suck ass, but think what that proves about you when you're supporting something which has proven to be so far worse in every way.

    61. Re:Not so funny when/if the seller commits suicide by gb506 · · Score: 1
      Be a patriot: Murder a Republican.

      Enough said.

    62. Re:Not so funny when/if the seller commits suicide by drewsome · · Score: 0

      Yuk. Tap water is nasty.

      And plenty of bottled water is... right out of the tap. Why pay extra for it? Also, "nasty" is in the eye of the beholder.

      And when your small, efficient car smashes into a tree, it'll be a small, efficient blood pancake.

      That's where being a better driver comes in. Lots of speeding tickets, only ever one serious accident, and it was the other guy's fault. Somehow, even though he had a bit ol 4X4 truck, he didn't see me when he decided to turn across traffic without stopping. Sure, my little Geo Sprint was totaled, but so was his nice big F250 -- bent the frame but good. And _he_ got the ticket.

    63. Re:Not so funny when/if the seller commits suicide by gb506 · · Score: 1

      1.) Show me a murder camp. 2.) You didn't seem to go bonkers when Echelon was revealed under a Donkey, which, if reports are correct, was a much more intrusive system. 3.) You want (maybe need) to believe they lied, the entirety of truth won't be known for some time, and is likely much more innocuous than you'd like. In the mean time, why don't you do your bleeding heart right and support the tens of millions of people who now have the right to determine their own destiny. And the women who can now vote, and in the case of Afghanistan, show their face and learn to read. You halfwit. Always the Chomsky following butthole bitching about human rights here, and human rights there. But as soon as somebody goes and does something that liberates 50 million people from totalitarianism, you bitch and moan and attack. It's pathetic.

    64. Re:Not so funny when/if the seller commits suicide by ddig83 · · Score: 1

      It's Vietnam.

      Seriously, at least Google your troll first.

    65. Re:Not so funny when/if the seller commits suicide by Darby · · Score: 1

      Enough said.

      Indeed it is. It sums up what is currently the single most patriotic act it is possible for a person to engage in. Glad you agree.

    66. Re:Not so funny when/if the seller commits suicide by gb506 · · Score: 1

      You should seek treatment, Darby, for you are a very sick person.

    67. Re:Not so funny when/if the seller commits suicide by DrSkwid · · Score: 1

      seriously, it's important !

      --
      There are places where the networks are not touching,and there are places where they are-Boeing's Lori Gunter
    68. Re:Not so funny when/if the seller commits suicide by Darby · · Score: 1

      1.) Show me a murder camp.

      Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, the CIA torture/death camps all over third world shitholes. Of course we can't forget the School of the Americas which was Reagan's terrorist murderer training camp.
      You really are totally out of touch with reality, aren't you?
      This is the major headline news of our day, Sparky. Maybe you should support your country over your party for once and do your duty as a citizen. It's called being informed.

      2.) You didn't seem to go bonkers when Echelon was revealed under a Donkey, which, if reports are correct, was a much more intrusive system.

      Typical ignorant Repug idiocy. Of course I went bonkers over that. Why would I as a patriotic American give a shit which party did it? That's you and your sort who treasonously support the party of fascist theocracy against your country and your constitution and attack the "other party" blindly with no sense of integrity, shame or decency.

      I ain't like you. I support freedom and liberty. Not fascism regardless of which party does it.
      You're a typical Republican. You desperately want simple easy black/white answers and so have a tremendously hard time dealing with reality which isn't that way.

      3.) You want (maybe need) to believe they lied, the entirety of truth won't be known for some time, and is likely much more innocuous than you'd like

      No, I desperately wish it wasn't true, but when every single fact backs that up and nothing at all backs up your delusional idea then a person with any integrity whatsoever is forced into faqcing the truth.

      People with no integrity whatsoever, like yourself and the rest of the Republicans need to hold on to the lie because facing up to what they've allowed and supported would involve personal responsibility which as we all know is anethema to Republicans.

      In the mean time, why don't you do your bleeding heart right and support the tens of millions of people who now have the right to determine their own destiny.

      Because I'm not a bleeding heart, and I'm smart enough to know that when you wage an illegal war and then tell your victims that they're free at gunpoint that that isn't freedom.
      You clearly despise freedom so have no understanding of it. You couldn't be a Republican otherwise.

      Always the Chomsky following butthole bitching about human rights here, and human rights there.

      Never read and Chomsky. You really should try just once to actually use your brain. It might be painful, but you might find that you are actually able to address reality rather than spouting out the same old tired Republican hate points.
      They don't apply and you look stupid when you spout them in the wrong places.

      But as soon as somebody goes and does something that liberates 50 million people from totalitarianism, you bitch and moan and attack. It's pathetic.

      Yes, the Republicans install totalitarian leaders and then want praise when they are no longer convenient and so they make up lies in order to go through the same old routine again.

      Sorry Sparky. I have integrity. You are most likely incapable of understanding that concept. You clearly despise it as you demonstrated so eloquently in your inane ignorant propaganda post.

      If you really want to live in a fascist theocracy that badly, why don't you move to Saudi Arabia. They're your kind of people. Since you are too much of a coward to live in a free country, move to one that suits you rather than destroying mine.
      I'm sick to death of you cowardly lying traitors.

    69. Re:Not so funny when/if the seller commits suicide by Darby · · Score: 1

      You should seek treatment, Darby, for you are a very sick person.

      I understand that you desperately need to believe that since your entire deluded world view depends on that being true, but it just isn't true.

      Think through what exactly it is that you just called "sick and in need of treatment".

      I am a patriotic American who loves my country and what it stands for. I support the death of people who are actively engaged in the destruction of my country, my constitution and my liberty for the defense of myself, my friends, my family and my fellow citizens.

      To sane people, this is known as patriotism, love of liberty and freedom and the like.

      You however, are such a twisted person that to you these things; which are considered by most to be examples of some of the best parts of human nature, are "sick and in need of treatment".
      Is it any surprise that people like you with such a warped and evil view of reality elected the most corrupt administration and congress in our entire history and still have the audacity to defend them because you find it easier to deny reality than to take any responsibility for your own actions?

      Obviously you think I'm sick because I stand up for what is good right and decent.

      You have a blind hatred of these things so you try to pretend that everyone else is sick and you're just fine.
      It's sad, but there's not much they can do with sociopaths so I won't bother recommending that you seek help.

    70. Re:Not so funny when/if the seller commits suicide by gb506 · · Score: 1
      1.) You obviously do not understand what a murder/death camp is. Ask a holocaust survivor if they think a terrorist detention facility where you get three hots and a cot, religious autonomy, and no work requirement fits their understanding of a death camp. This is DU moonbat FUD.

      2.) If you think it unreasonable to monitor calls made to or from a suspected terrorist, you need to drop the pipe.

      3.) You need to consult the UN security council resolutions of late 2002 and early 2003. The action was clearly legal from an international perspective, and the US Congress overwhelmingly authorized the action based on the same intel as the administration. No matter how many times you repeat the illegality theme, it does not make it true.

      4.) You should ask all of the people who risk their lives to show up at a Baghdad or Kabul voting station if they were forced to do so, and if they are unhappy with being able to do so. Then go ask the members of parliament in both countries, who risk their lives every day in employment of democracy if they think they are totalitarian puppets. Hardly. You've got your worldview upside down, dude. It's the islamofascist terrorists who are the totalitarians. Just ask the women of Afghanistan...

    71. Re:Not so funny when/if the seller commits suicide by gb506 · · Score: 1
      Think through what exactly it is that you just called "sick and in need of treatment".

      I did. You say it's patriotic to kill a fellow American based on their political affiliation. That's sick, and you're sick because of it. You're an evil, deluded person. I hope you get help before you hurt someone.

    72. Re:Not so funny when/if the seller commits suicide by Darby · · Score: 1

      1.) You obviously do not understand what a murder/death camp is.

      No, I quite obviously do. It's a camp where people are tortured and murdered. This is what we are doing right now in these places. Or we ship them off to third parties to do it for us.
      Your best defense is "we're still not as bad as Hitler". Does the insanity of the crap you spew ever even register with you?

      2.) If you think it unreasonable to monitor calls made to or from a suspected terrorist, you need to drop the pipe.

      Since you think it's unreasonable to have any sort of oversight whatsoever to allow a reasonable person to believe that this has anything at all to do with terrorism, it's clearly you who needs to stop smoking crack.

      3.) You need to consult the UN security council resolutions of late 2002 and early 2003. The action was clearly legal from an international perspective, and the US Congress overwhelmingly authorized the action based on the same intel as the administration. No matter how many times you repeat the illegality theme, it does not make it true.

      No matter how many times you choose to ignore all of the relevant facts like falsified documents, lies and the treasonous outing of a CIA operative in revenge for pointing out the blatant lies of the administrastion it won't make the tooth fairy real.

      You've got your worldview upside down, dude. It's the islamofascist terrorists who are the totalitarians. Just ask the women of Afghanistan...

      The islamofascists are totalitarians. The Christofascists are also totalitarians. Just ask the gays in America.
      Your delusion is that there is magically 2 sides, one magically always right and one magically always wrong. That's ignorant, simplistic, and childish.

    73. Re:Not so funny when/if the seller commits suicide by Darby · · Score: 1

      I did. You say it's patriotic to kill a fellow American based on their political affiliation.

      I said nothing at all like that.
      Political affiliation is not even vaguely relevant to the issue.
      It's direct acts of aggression taken against my country, my constitution and my fellow citizens that is the issue.

      If the Republicans give up fascism and give up theocracy as their entire platform, then the issue would go away.
      They declared all out war on freedom. They declared all out war on the constitution. They declared all out war on integrity.

      These are specific actions. That it is a political group that has done this does not in any way indicate that the political affiliation is the problem. It's the actions that count. They speak far louder than words.

      Try actually making sense next time rather than mindlessly ranting about something completely divorced from reality.

    74. Re:Not so funny when/if the seller commits suicide by Damvan · · Score: 1

      Typical Republican spin. Take the actions of a few extremist Democrats, or Environmentalists or other group you oppose, and then attribute those same beliefs and actions to all members of that group. So, 4 Democrats slashed the tires of some vehicles on election day, therefore all Democrats approved of that action and are responsible.

      Let's try this the other way. Timothy McVeigh was a conservative. Therefore, all conservatives advocate the slaughter of innocent Government employees. Strom Thurmond was a Republican, therefore all Republicans are racist. Shall I go on?

  2. Sector encryption by flobberchops · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I always use sector encryption on my hard drives and wipe using PGP wipe when selling. Why not use the new Seagate drives with built in crypto now? Vista has sector crypto now? Why not use NTFS encrypted folders for your stuff but that doesnt cover caches and various temp files used by applications. This is something applications need to do, allow us to manage any possible cache and storage instaed of the currently splattered and hidden about files today. How about a standard on how Applications manage this kind of like a personal privacy standard?

    1. Re:Sector encryption by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I use Eraser.

    2. Re:Sector encryption by davidesh · · Score: 5, Funny

      I wipe with charmin ultra, it does a great job.

    3. Re:Sector encryption by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      PGP Wipe won't run if the laptop's broken. You can't even drag stuff to the trash.

      Not that that's proof that the laptop was busted (it was also missing the power supply, as noted by the seller), but makes me suspicious.

    4. Re:Sector encryption by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      i seem to remember that drives with SMART technology have inbuilt function which allows you to erase the drive data in various ways (1 swipe, 2 swipes, etc.) they may or may not be able to withstand NSA but i'm pretty sure that they'd withstand any recovery tools available in the internet.

    5. Re:Sector encryption by davidesh · · Score: 5, Informative

      try Darik's Boot and Nuke... http://dban.sourceforge.net/

    6. Re:Sector encryption by Fred_A · · Score: 1

      I just put the laptop in the microwave at full blast for 20 minutes, it has worked fine so far.

      --

      May contain traces of nut.
      Made from the freshest electrons.
    7. Re:Sector encryption by Alan426 · · Score: 1

      Taking a 10-pound sledge to the platters does a pretty effective job of wiping the drive. Hammer: $0. New drive: $100. Data security: Priceless.

    8. Re:Sector encryption by fm6 · · Score: 1
      Why not...
      Because when you're a total twit, it doesn't occur to you.
    9. Re:Sector encryption by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      mod parent up!

    10. Re:Sector encryption by Isotopian · · Score: 1

      Yes, but do you use double ply? After all, you don't want it to tear and leave behind little dongle-berries!

      --

      It's poetry with a beat behind it! And guns! They're like beatniks with automatic weapons.

    11. Re:Sector encryption by johncadengo · · Score: 1

      Why are you bringing this up? Just the obligatory nerd (filled with technical jargon) comment?

      I doubt this guy even formatted his computer.

      --
      My page.
    12. Re:Sector encryption by moro_666 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      how about booting from a knoppix cd and doing

      #shell> dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/hda

      ?

      maybe some modifications to the line, but it should work :D ofcourse you could also take the input from /dev/random, but that could result a working windows installation ... with odds one against some zillion billion dillion.

      as for why not to use encrpytion: unless seagate has implemented it without a significant overhead, the reason for me would be performance. i didn't buy my laptop to have another sloppy lagging slow computer on my lap or desk.

      --

      I'd tell you the chances of this story being a dupe, but you wouldn't like it.
    13. Re:Sector encryption by someone1234 · · Score: 1

      You sell a lot, do you? And of course you already sold your Vista capable computer...

      --
      Patents Drive Free Software as Hurricanes Drive Construction Industry
    14. Re:Sector encryption by neotuli · · Score: 1

      It's not up to applications to protect people, it's up to people themselves. If one is too stupid to take care of their personal data, it is, after all, their own fault. Especially when they go selling it to someone else...

    15. Re:Sector encryption by jolshefsky · · Score: 2, Funny

      Encryption takes space and with porn, every byte counts. I thought everybody knew that.

      --
      --- Jason Olshefsky

      Karma: Poser (mostly affected by adding this line long after everyone else did)

    16. Re:Sector encryption by linvir · · Score: 3, Funny
      Hammer: $0
      THIEF!
    17. Re:Sector encryption by Professor_UNIX · · Score: 2, Informative

      Wiping with all zeroes is a bad way to scrub a disk. You need to use different patterns each pass through at least, but random data would be much better. As for encryption speed.. I use the FileVault (128-bit AES) built into MacOS X on my Powerbook and I don't notice any performance difference unless that damn Spotlight search engine update is running at the time, but it's slow even if I wasn't running an encrypted filesystem.

    18. Re:Sector encryption by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      #shell> dd if=/dev/urandom of=/dev/hda

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    19. Re:Sector encryption by freakmn · · Score: 1
      with porn, every byte counts

      Something in your comment made me wince. Ouch.
      --
      warning: This post is likely to contain gobs of dripping sarcasm. Consume at your own risk.
    20. Re:Sector encryption by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ah, but what you're all forgetting with these "he should have wiped his hard drive" posts is that he couldn't wipe the drive, because (as far he knew) the thing didn't work when he sold it. A bit circumstantial, but it tends to indicate that he knew the laptop was broken when he shipped the thing...

    21. Re:Sector encryption by saltydogdesign · · Score: 1

      I prefer a hammer. The buyer can get a new drive.

      --
      // This is not a sig.
    22. Re:Sector encryption by QCompson · · Score: 1

      How about a standard on how Applications manage this kind of like a personal privacy standard?

      "Personal privacy" are the new codewords for terrorist-supporter. How long have you been a terrorist?

      What if Al Gonzalez needed to check your hard-drive to make sure you aren't a terrerist or a kid-fiddler? Don't thwart Gonzo with encryption. The government needs to be able to pry into every single aspect of our personal lives to protect us from the oogity-boogity terrorists.

    23. Re:Sector encryption by flobberchops · · Score: 1

      Do YOU know where all the applications you use stores little bits of information here and there? I know I don't.

    24. Re:Sector encryption by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd recommend using the DoD standards for wiping. I believe those standards are to delete and then re-write the drive seven times. A forensic search of a hard drive apparently can uncover several "layers" of data, thus the need to do it 7X. And no, I'm not an expert on magnetic resonance so I can't explain how that's done, but there's wiki-info here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File_wipe
      It's perhaps academic to consider if an average ebay buyer would do something like this, and depends on the data you want to nuke, but I'd rather be safe than sorry.

    25. Re:Sector encryption by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 1

      > Why not use the new Seagate drives with built in crypto now?

      And this would have helped in this situation just how again?

      Unless the drive recognizes it's in a different computer and refuses to decrypt, he's gained nothing. And even in that case, repairing the old computer (barring CPU S/N or whatever the drive looks for) would have cracked the HDD open anyway.

      --
      (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
    26. Re:Sector encryption by davidesh · · Score: 1

      dban has settings for DoD and more that will surpass DoD standards as well.

    27. Re:Sector encryption by multisync · · Score: 1

      shred -vz /dev/hda

      writes random data 25 times by default. You can change that number
      with another switch. The v puts it in verbose mode so you can see how
      far along it is, and the z writes zeros on the final pass.

      --
      I don't care why you're posting AC
    28. Re:Sector encryption by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Why are you bringing this up? Just the obligatory nerd (filled with technical
      > jargon) comment?

      This is a site by and for nerds. You get the odd clueless newb here, certainly, but generally in a discussion about the problems inherent in getting rid of hardware containing storage devices you can expect to read about how to get rid of the data on the storage devices, and it's kind of hard to do that without explaining how to do and how to do it. Just because you don't understand it...

    29. Re:Sector encryption by davidsyes · · Score: 1

      I currently wipe with the stuff from Kirkland. It's pretty good at wiping out the Klingons... but it's not as smooth as Tribbles...

      (travels further back in time to avoid the Federation Temporal Commission...)

      --
      Previously: "Linux... Toward the Sunrise..." Now: "Linux... Toward the-- No, now, part of Every Sunrise"
  3. karma by NetMagi · · Score: 4, Interesting

    karma, that's all there is to say

    I honestly love when ppl's stupidity overrules their lack of honesty and it bites them.

    1. Re:karma by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That scammer is getting what he deserves. Not only that "blog" was posted to the reg and slashdot, but also on digg... That'll learn him :)

    2. Re:karma by TCM · · Score: 2, Insightful

      At first glance, you think "serves him right" of course, I'm no exception.

      But where I live, there are things you can do if someone fraudulently sells you non-working stuff as working.

      This is vigilante justice, plain and simple. I don't think the proportionalities match here.

      The seller should be forced to refund the money or provide a working laptop and the buyer should face charges for whatever crimes he committed by posting this stuff.

      --
      Of course it runs NetBSD. BTC: 1NT7QvbetmANwaMzhpVL6
    3. Re:karma by anagama · · Score: 1

      Good luck enforcing your judgment in Dubai. If the buyer is to be believed, it took two months for Amir to mail the laptop after he was paid, it wasn't as described ... besides not working, e.g., 1/4 the advertised memory, and Amir had left the country.

      Secondly, let's say you do get a judgment against someone -- you are out your filing fee, the costs of getting the judgment recognized by a foreign court (and in the States, this means in another state even), and the costs associated with collections. And good luck collecting anyway. Fact is, the perfect fraud is to sell a laptop on ebay to an out of state buyer for $300. Oh, and more good luck proving the laptop wasn't damaged in the mail -- in other words, to prove fraud you'll have to prove the seller lied about it's functionality. Care to bet he says it worked fine before mailing and "oh look, I clearly stated I'm not responsible for shipping damage".

      I once bought a laptop on ebay. Completely not as described in a bad way (slower processor). I'm bitter.

      --
      What changed under Obama? Nothing Good
    4. Re:karma by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      what crimes? all the data was on the device that was SOLD TO HIM. wouldn't the seller have to take atleast ONE step to delete said data?

    5. Re:karma by RajivSLK · · Score: 1

      the buyer should face charges for whatever crimes he committed by posting this stuff.

      I'm not sure that he did commit any crime.

    6. Re:karma by johncadengo · · Score: 1

      Stupidity overruling their lack of honesty? What does that mean?

      Anyways, you made no sense. But, dishonesty (a better term, by the way) and stupidity do have a slight correlation.

      (He gets modded up? He can't even spell people, let alone make sense.)

      --
      My page.
    7. Re:karma by GTMoogle · · Score: 1

      Obviously, he couldn't delete it. The laptop was broken and he didn't know how to swap the hard drive into another computer. :)

    8. Re:karma by jamesh · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Agreed. The worse thing about 'vigilante justice' is of course that people are going to believe him, even if he's making some or all of it up. Judge, jury, and executioner are separate people for a reason.

    9. Re:karma by Errtu76 · · Score: 1

      Exactly. There are legal ways that he didn't even try. He went to the seller, and when he found out he couldn't get any further, he resorted to these actions. I'm not at all familiar with the justice system in the UK, but i can imagine that if he faces trial, he'll be asked something like "Why didn't you contact the police first?". Because involving the police means no publicity for himself maybe? Come on, what webmaster wouldn't be happy to get 2 million hits in less than a week?

    10. Re:karma by ArsenneLupin · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Come on, what webmaster wouldn't be happy to get 2 million hits in less than a week?

      ... and his site has google ads. I'm sure he now has enough money to buy ten laptops, new!

    11. Re:karma by TCM · · Score: 1

      Alright, IANAL. But here goes:

      Let's assume the seller knew the laptop was defective, as he likely did. As a layman, he may have assumed that no data was actually accessible anymore. Thus his intention surely was not to sell all his private data. That can be considered an unfortunate side effect.

      Law, however, often makes a distinction between what actually happened and what someone intended. Thus, I can remotely see how someone could construct a claim that the buyer, although being scammed in another way, can't claim a right to publish all the private details and copyrighted(!) photos.

      At least in Germany, law protect errors and misconceptions of people by taking into account what someone most likely intended instead of looking at cold hard facts. If I mistakenly place a bid of 1000,-EUR on an item that's currently at 5,-EUR and whose value is maybe 50,-EUR at most, the seller can't step in immediately and claim 1000,-EUR from me. I can always claim a mistake on my side because it's pretty obvious that I made an error. And the seller would most likely lose.

      Of course you have an obligation to correct your mistake as soon as you notice in order to claim protection. If it's clear that you knew some fact and went on regardless, things could turn against you.

      I think in this case it is pretty clear that the seller did never intend to sell all his private and intimate data. The fact that he scammed the buyer is bad in itself, but a totally different case. That's how a proper justice system works. You don't weigh one wrongdoing against another. You treat them separately.

      --
      Of course it runs NetBSD. BTC: 1NT7QvbetmANwaMzhpVL6
    12. Re:karma by Guppy06 · · Score: 1

      "But where I live, there are things you can do if someone fraudulently sells you non-working stuff as working."

      You're not familiar with eBay, are you?

    13. Re:karma by LordLucless · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Yep. That results in some truly wonderful miscarriages of justice. We've had a couple like that over here. You treat the home invasion and the subsequent thumping of the home invader with a baseball bat as separate crimes. Result? Home invader gets a slap on the wrist, home owner gets charged with greivous bodily harm with a deadly weapon. Or the trespasser who tripped on the garden host and sued the owner of the yard they were trespassing in.

      If someone commits a crime, the law should not protect them from the repercussions of that crime. If we take the article at face value, the guy in this story intentionally sold a non-functional laptop. Because the laptop was non-functional, he erroneously assumed that his porn collection was inaccessible. If he had been selling a fully-functional laptop, he wouldn't have made that assumption, and he wouldn't have had a trouble. The direct cause of his current predicament is his own attempt to defraud another person.

      If you've ever tried to reclaim money through a small claims court, you know how farcical it is. You can get all the judgements made in your favour, but you still have to pay out for anything you want done. Send out the sherif to repossess goods? Pay up. Need a locksmith to get into the place where the goods are kept? You need to foot the bill. And there are no guarantees that when you do all that you'll find anything able to be sold, especially if your complaint is against a company. You'll have shelled out $300 and all you'll have to show for it is an unenforcable judgement.

      On the issue of vigilante justice: yes, it's bad. But people generally only take the law into their own hands when the authorities aren't holding on to it tightly enough. A recent story on the news over here was that of the manager of a hotel, whose rooms had been broken into over 60 times in the last year. On a number of occasions, he filmed the thieves as they robbed him, and handed in the tape to police. There have been no arrests in connection to any of the robberies. When it comes to a choice between vigilante justice and no justice, you don't have to be a genius to guess what people will decide to go for.

      --
      Just because you're paranoid doesn't mean there isn't an invisible demon about to eat your face
    14. Re:karma by Oh-No-Mr-Bill · · Score: 1

      First off you don't know that the buyer didn't go to the police. Second, he broke no laws in posting the contents of the laptop. He (the buyer) is to be appluded in showing restraint in not publishing the Mothers details. Amir needs to pay the buyer back.

    15. Re:karma by gorfie · · Score: 1

      You may be right that the buyer's actions were illegal, but just look at the other case briefly mentioned in the article. Some woman purchased an ipod and never received it. She obviously took the legal approach and look where she is, the police are investigating it and she probably won't see a dime even if a court rules in her favor. The law isn't working in this particular case.

      This guy's solution has obviously punished a fraudulent seller who would otherwise continue scamming people. In fact, the seller might rement payment just to get the embarrassing content taken down (but it's probably going to be mirrored somewhere so why bother).

    16. Re:karma by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting
      Fact is, the perfect fraud is to sell a laptop on ebay to an out of state buyer for $300.


      Actually, I believe you can rip them off for up to at least $999. If it's under $1000, the police will "put it on file" (forget about it). Afterall, they've got better things to do, like meet that speeding ticket quota or raid parties for free beer.

      There's the miniscule chance that the buyer will get ahold of somebody at eBay/Paypal that will actually help them but it's unlikely it'll be for the full amount and there's a good chance that you can eventually get ahold of someone who'll undo it anyway.

      Folks, this is why you never use eBay to buy anything that costs more than you're willing to lose. It's also why you never attach Paypal (if you have to have it) to a real bank account - credit can be chargebacked (or is that charged back?), EFT from your bank, to say nothing of funds Paypal is holding, is much harder.
    17. Re:karma by suv4x4 · · Score: 1

      This is vigilante justice, plain and simple. I don't think the proportionalities match here.

      Dude, he prpmised him a working laptop, but gave him a broken laptop with his legs fetish and gay porn collection.

      In the real world stupid animals are not protected under "anti-vigilante" principles, this is why homo sapiens exists. Because the stupid ones died.

      What you're saying is we gotta protect those mofos and even pat them on their head and say "there, there". This is why the modern world is growing full of stupid assholes; everyone's protecting them and hiding behind the non-existant "justice".

      You only get justice (from your viewpoint) if you have an army of lawyers and money to pay them. Otherwise what you get is a hope your foe goes in hell after his death.

    18. Re:karma by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 1

      ".. and his site has google ads. I'm sure he now has enough money to buy ten laptops, new!"

      Google ads don't pay that much. He's probably doing a little better than breaking even with his hosting.

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    19. Re:karma by Errtu76 · · Score: 1

      You're right. I don't know that. But it would seem obvious (to me) that if he did, he would've mentioned it on his website. Come on, this would just put more fuel on the fire if this was the case, right?

    20. Re:karma by Oh-No-Mr-Bill · · Score: 1

      OK, Perhaps the buyer was way over the top with his web blog. It doesn't change the fact that Amir had the opportunity to do the right thing in the first place and circumvent all the resulting hassle. Surely he is responsible to provide a working, as advertised (memory) laptop, if not legally but certainly morally (at least according to all the "Good" books). After all we are talking Karma here.

  4. The Register's new market: tabloids by iamlucky13 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Fantastic. I thought the register considered itself a somewhat legitimate news entity, but now they've posted a link to a defamatory website of unverified accuracy in an article. Many, many points down the toilet in my book.

    1. Re:The Register's new market: tabloids by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow! You had the Register in the toilet - what high regards you have! I kinda thought it was down in the sewer level...

    2. Re:The Register's new market: tabloids by BorgCopyeditor · · Score: 0, Redundant
      Many, many points down the toilet in my book.

      I was about to post the same. Posting the link is totally indefensible.

      --
      Shop as usual. And avoid panic buying.
    3. Re:The Register's new market: tabloids by Splab · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Uhm.. what?

      They just reported it as it is, someone claims to have been cheated out of a working laptop, now he has posted stuff from it on the net and gets himself looked into by the police... Oh and theres a website for you to look at.

      Why is that not proper reporting? They don't even take sides - which is highly unusual for The Reg.

    4. Re:The Register's new market: tabloids by iamlucky13 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It's not verified (making it questionable as news at best, but since it's of a personal rather than public nature, I wouldn't even grant it that much ground to stand on), it is very highly damaging to the guy's reputation (not just as an online seller, but more importantly as a person), and it's potentially dangerous (950,000+ hits and he's getting threats...some sicko among all those visitors just might be crazy enough to do something based on the rumor). The one site linked to obviously has taken a side. If there were any hard facts presented, writing the article at least would make sense, but not providing an avenue into the alleged perpetrator's personal life by linking to a vigilante website.

      I hate digging into the big bag of cliche counter-arguments, but here's a case where this one definitely fits: How would you like it if someone displayed your entire personal life (simple or shocking as it may be) in a deliberately disparaging fashion? Or perhaps (we don't actually know in this case), they make a bunch of crap up about you. I knew a guy who's personal and professional reputation was destroyed by a false allegation that was spread freely before any proper investigation was made. The case against him was tossed out in court, but his personal business (bike shop) never recovered and he had to close down and leave town. Assuming that he was innocent, as we have every bit as much reason to believe as the judge did, is this in any way just? Did those who spread the rumor contribute in any way to the betterment of society or did they harm it?

    5. Re:The Register's new market: tabloids by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And this surprises you? I'm sorry, but have you been reading a different website called "The Register" and got the two confused?

    6. Re:The Register's new market: tabloids by ScouseMouse · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Two things about this post:

      The Register contains lots of biased articles. While it does contain decent articles, its usually better to get them from the source, such as securityfocus. This, to me, doesnt make it a news source, it makes it a blog with news in it. (However i have to say i am an avid fan of the BOFH)

      secondally, The police are now investigating. I suspect this is due to the content of the comments, some of which seem to bring out some very nasty sentiments - a lot of which were unrelated to the issue, rather than the content of the blog, itself, however.

      While i think the owner should have kept more control over it, perhaps restricting posting, i dont think they have done anything wrong. They decided that a public humilliation was a good way of going about this.

      If you believe the blog, and i have reason not to, the owner of the blog tried to sort this out amicably. Anyone who has been through EBAY's dispute procedure will tell you its a pile of cr*p, certainly in the uk. Other than cancelling accounts, there is very little they can do other than to refer the seller to the police. I dont know if this happened in this case.

      However, its true to say some of the UK tabloid press, have a lot to answer for, and the BBC should make an apology for misreporting and post it publically on their website.

    7. Re:The Register's new market: tabloids by x2A · · Score: 1

      This is exactly what I've come to expect from the register to be honest, and from the general population for that matter. People are very quick to believe someone has done something bad, whether they have or not. If the person's ever cleared, either nobody hears about it, or people believe they "got away with it" due to a failure in the legal system or whatever. "Innocent until proven guilty" doesn't exist in the real world, the uneducated masses have made sure of that, it's far too easy to damage or even ruin somebody's life. I think there should be harsher consequences for people who do it.

      --
      The revolution will not be televised... but it will have a page on Wikipedia
    8. Re:The Register's new market: tabloids by Hognoxious · · Score: 1
      it is very highly damaging to the guy's reputation (not just as an online seller, but more importantly as a person)
      So? Since when was that a crime?
      and it's potentially dangerous (950,000+ hits and he's getting threats...some sicko among all those visitors just might be crazy enough to do something based on the rumor)
      I suppose the CPS should stop prosecuting suspected kiddy fiddlers then, since that leads to the same results.

      I have no sympathy for the seller at all. The words "shoot", "self" and "foot" spring to mind.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    9. Re:The Register's new market: tabloids by radicalnerd · · Score: 1

      I thought the register considered itself a somewhat legitimate news entity

      well, with articles like this...

    10. Re:The Register's new market: tabloids by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And if the laptop was stolen, and the pictures aren't of the seller or his friends?

    11. Re:The Register's new market: tabloids by bronney · · Score: 1

      How would you like it if someone displayed your entire personal life (simple or shocking as it may be) in a deliberately disparaging fashion? Or perhaps (we don't actually know in this case), they make a bunch of crap up about you.

      I offer evil ass 4 face human beings $10,000.00 to disprove self-inflicted Taoism x 4 creation principle by making up a bunch of crap about me and post it on the net WHILE getting posted on /.

    12. Re:The Register's new market: tabloids by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was falsely accused along with a bunch of friends; even our families believed the accusation until the truth came out much later. The person(s) who made the false accusation and who had spread malicious gossip about us finally owned up to it in the midst of some 10 to 12 people, and we forgave them.

      But the damage was already done. Too many people still view us as guilty, and they won't take the trouble of finding out the truth.

      Have you noticed that accusations are communicated very fast by word of mouth, but any correction / acquital / justification takes forever to go around even within a small family circle.

      Amir has perhaps duped the buyer as it is alleged. But this website is taking things too far. There is a real danger that Amir may do something stupid like taking his life. I hope and pray that he doesn't. It will be such a waste.

    13. Re:The Register's new market: tabloids by LordLucless · · Score: 1

      Well, the website has self-shot pictures of Amir topless. Assuming these really are shots of Amir (not unreasonable, as of they weren't the site would be easy to discredit) then either the author is telling the truth and Amir sent him a faulty laptop (believing that the laptop being broken would prevent retrievel of the images) or that he sent him a fully functional laptop, which he knew still contained all his personal details, photos of himself, and his porn collection. So Amir is either a fraudster or incredibly stupid. Based on the fact that he had the ability to set up a sale on ebay, I'd say he's not stupid enough for the latter to be the case. No proof, but the balance of the evidence is there.

      Of course, I'm not sure it's responsible reporting, but I don't have a problem with the guy setting up the website in the first place.

      --
      Just because you're paranoid doesn't mean there isn't an invisible demon about to eat your face
    14. Re:The Register's new market: tabloids by jcidiotashram · · Score: 1

      ok the buyers gets a refund or a replacement laptop(his complaint has been rectified), then he pulls the website down. but whatever damage he did to the seller has been done already and there is no way he can go back and make it go away (even if the law puts the guy in prison or something like that). it is the same way everybody feels when we talk to a customer service(esp airlines) but that doesn't mean that we take part in vigilante.

    15. Re:The Register's new market: tabloids by ScouseMouse · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I should probably tell you now that its more likely that the blogger is probably just helping with the investigation for the contents of the comments on his blog, some of which were Racist, Homophobic, included death threats and just plain nasty.

      I suspect that the phrase "Co-operating with the police" probably in this case means exactly that rather than the usual "Were keeping him locked up because we think he did it, we just havent got enough to prosecute him yet."

      Unless he really is lying through his teeth, and the laptop was up to spec and working when he got it, i dont think he is any danger of being called up for Libel.
      That implies at least some degree of lying on his part.

      IMHO, a fraudster got caught out. and got the heavy end of a hammer dropped on him
      Shame.

    16. Re:The Register's new market: tabloids by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The biggest surprise of all - a Register article that did not blame the US as the cause of the problem.

    17. Re:The Register's new market: tabloids by pointNumberOne · · Score: 1

      secondally?

    18. Re:The Register's new market: tabloids by Nos9 · · Score: 1

      Yeah but the fact that photos of the guy are still on the laptop lead me to suspect that the laptop was indeed "nonfunctional" at the time of sale.
          Unless the buyer went to a godo deal of work to recover the data, or the seller is an idiot and didn't bother erasing his personal stuff from the machine, or the buyer is just making it all up (which should be easy enough to check, do the photos match the seller? are they psoted elsewhere that the buyer could have gotten them from?)

          If everything the buyer said is truthful, what rights does the seller retain in terms of the data on the laptop he sold (even assuming it did work)? It is not like the buyer broke into the sellers house for the information, nor that he "hacked" into the sellers computer (since the laptop was now the buyers computer) I'm not sure that there is much that can be legally done about it. If I write up a detailed description of how I am going to do something illegal, then lose/give/sell that write up to another person and they turn it over to the police I can't sue them for releasing my personal information and most likely the police would show up at my house to arrest me, using that as evidence.
          The only thing I think the buyer might be in trouble for is pretending to be the seller on his website, which was probably a poor choice of things to do.

    19. Re:The Register's new market: tabloids by iamlucky13 · · Score: 1

      "Shoot", "self", "foot" might be an ok response to the story if he really is guilty (honestly, I wouldn't be surprised, but the response is disproportionate), but the conversation here just assumes he's guilty.

      My point wasn't about the legality of the vigilantism, it was about the asshole-itude of the buyer and lack of responsibility on the part of The Register in spreading hearsay. Also, libel can be a crime in some countries and is a serious civil matter in quite a few, including the US and UK.

    20. Re:The Register's new market: tabloids by ScouseMouse · · Score: 1

      Yeah, so my english is awful. Thats not really unusual around here is it.

    21. Re:The Register's new market: tabloids by edoug · · Score: 1

      I think it's a fake. I looked at the guy's ebay name (SpikyTom or SpikeyTom...don't remember now) and there was never a negative feedback..which you think as the buyer he would. Revenge or not, my first reaction would be branding the guy on ebay -the appropriate outlet in this case, but he didn't.

      --
      meh.
    22. Re:The Register's new market: tabloids by Hognoxious · · Score: 1
      Also, libel can be a crime in some countries and is a serious civil matter in quite a few, including the US and UK.
      Since the seller appears to have fled the country (draw your own conclusions about that), he'll have a bit of difficulty bringing a case. And the defence of fair comment will make it even more difficult to win it.
      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  5. CFNM by JohnGrahamCumming · · Score: 5, Funny

    Whatever the rights and wrongs of posting this guy's personal information, I did learn from one of his photos about a fetish I'd never come across: CFNM (Clothed Female, Naked Male).

    Thanks Amir!

    John.

    1. Re:CFNM by Abuzar · · Score: 1, Informative
      I did learn from one of his photos about a fetish I'd never come across: CFNM (Clothed Female, Naked Male).
      What? You have never heard of CFNM before? What happened to your sex ed? or does your sex ed come from america?

      I am so sorry for you. One should always strive to keep themselves informed and educated, especially when it comes to matters of the sensual persuasion. Here, let me help you out:

      Sample pictures of CFNM
      Sample videos of CFNM
      CFNM picture galleries on gigagalleries
      CFNM video galleries on gigagalleries

      Hope these pointers help.
    2. Re:CFNM by fm6 · · Score: 1

      If you don't see a new sexual fetish at least once a month, you must not browse the web very much.

    3. Re:CFNM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      CMNF is MUCH better.

    4. Re:CFNM by JohnGrahamCumming · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Actually you forget that I'm old enough to have used Usenet when it was in its prime. Most of what you can find on the web was already seen on Usenet long, long ago.

      And someone would have had the decency to write a FAQ about it.

      John.

    5. Re:CFNM by baadger · · Score: 2, Informative

      And someone would have had the decency to write a FAQ about it. ..and these days people write a Wikipedia article about it.

    6. Re:CFNM by JavaLord · · Score: 1

      what? You have never heard of CFNM before? What happened to your sex ed? or does your sex ed come from america?

      Yes, because the primary goal of taxpayer funded education should be to educate teens on every fetish imaginable. I'm not suprised at how "educated" you are about this particular fetish though, considering some of your posting history.

  6. and the seller... by macadamia_harold · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The buyer gives a little lesson on why you should always clean your hard drive before you sell a computer.

    And if you read the full story, you'll see that the seller gives a little lesson on how the law views vigilantism on the internets. Hint: Police are involved.

    1. Re:and the seller... by moe.ron · · Score: 2, Interesting

      What law was broken here? Is the buyer personally threatening the seller or something? Because if not, I can't see how the buyer did anything wrong. The seller sold the laptop, hardware and all (read: software/data). I don't see why the buyer does not have the right to do what he pleases with all of the seller's personal information. The seller put his personal life on the laptop up for bid. The buyer bought it all, so why doesn't the buyer have the right the information and the right to post all of it online if he/she pleases?

    2. Re:and the seller... by Neoprofin · · Score: 4, Informative

      The police are involved because the seller called them, not because the police are doing anything.

      It's still purely a civil matter as reported by the register and the defamatory site is still up. Score one for vigilantism on the internet.

      Unless of course this is one of those things that falls under libel in Britain because it damages his reputation even if it does end up being 100% true.

    3. Re:and the seller... by Pantero+Blanco · · Score: 1

      I don't think it falls under libel, even by the British definition, if it's true. Of course, it (and just about anything) might be considered "Anti-Social Behavior".

    4. Re:and the seller... by igb · · Score: 4, Informative

      Truth is an absolute defence to libel in England and Wales and I presume Northern Ireland (I don't know about Scotland). The problem is the reversed burden of proof: the defendent has to prove truth, albeit only to civil standards.

    5. Re:and the seller... by crossmr · · Score: 1

      If its 100% true, its not libel is it?
      Libel only exists when you tell a lie about someone and it damages their reputation.
      http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=libel

    6. Re:and the seller... by AvitarX · · Score: 1

      If you buy a photo from a photographer are you allowed to post it on the internet?

      If I were the victem I would be sueing under copyright law, trying to get money per photo per hit.

      I d think the seller is a lieing schmuck though, because I doubt anyone would leave that data on the laptop if it worked, though maybe a data recovery program was used and the buyer is the schmuck.

      --
      Wow, sent an e-mail as suggested when clicking on "use classic" banner, and got a fast response that addressed my msg
    7. Re:and the seller... by flooey · · Score: 1

      If its 100% true, its not libel is it?

      Not in the US, no. In some areas of the world, though, publishing something that's true but damaging can be legally libelous. I don't know if the UK is one of those places, I somewhat doubt it.

    8. Re:and the seller... by smvp6459 · · Score: 1

      How about slander?...sure sounds like he's being defamed, regardless of the truth of the statement.

    9. Re:and the seller... by Pantero+Blanco · · Score: 4, Informative

      Defamation is spreading falsehoods to harm another person's reputation. "Libel" is the term used when the defamation takes the form of print; "slander" is the term used when the defamation is oral.

    10. Re:and the seller... by NeMon'ess · · Score: 1

      However facts, such as passwords, cannot be copyrighted. Those came with the laptop.

    11. Re:and the seller... by Fred_A · · Score: 1

      The first *obvious* thing is to contact the seller with a formal complaint so you at least have a trace that you got the wrong laptop and possibly sort things out (or not). Afterwards, if he persists in being a diskchead and you've built a nice papertrail of it all, then you can start being silly and playing potentially stupid jokes (although posting potentially embarassing pictures of complete strangers can be dangerous in Europe where one's right to his own image can be much more strict than in the US, although it depends on the country).

      Anyway the buyer did make a few mistakes along the way and while I understand he was pissed, he might well end up in trouble for it.

      --

      May contain traces of nut.
      Made from the freshest electrons.
    12. Re:and the seller... by BattyMan · · Score: 1

      The common element in all those criminal things is "falsehood".
      (In the US, at least, for now) having the truth on your side is a "perfect defense" against slander, libel, defamation of character, whatever. Yuo can say _anything_, and damn the consequences to whoever, if it's TRUE. If the buyer's story checks out, the authorities will walk away with both feet (well, can't say for sure, it _is_ the U.K.).

      --
      Exceeding the recommended torque is not recommended.
    13. Re:and the seller... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In the UK, the truth is not necessarily an absolute defence against a charge of libel. Consider the following:

      "The captain was sober on the day he piloted his ship into the pier."

      Now that may be strictly accurate, but a reasonable person could infer that the captain's sobriety was noteworthy (ie, he was usually drunk). A more neutral way of reporting the same fact would be:

      "The captain, a teetotaller, piloted his ship into the pier."

    14. Re:and the seller... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Please learn to speak English and spell.

      Thanks.

    15. Re:and the seller... by jcr · · Score: 2, Informative

      the defamatory site is still up.

      It's not clear that the site is defamatory. I'm not sure about English law, but in the USA, truth is a complete defense.

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    16. Re:and the seller... by Vo0k · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      Exception: PATRIOT act. Say a senator is corrupted. Present proof. Since you're damaging the reputation of the government, you're acting against the Country and should be arrested on charges of terrorism.

      --
      Anagram("United States of America") == "Dine out, taste a Mac, fries"
    17. Re:and the seller... by Jussi+K.+Kojootti · · Score: 1

      I don't know of any jurisdiction where you are allowed to use passwords you find like this. It has nothing to do with copyright, lot to do with common sense...

    18. Re:and the seller... by NeMon'ess · · Score: 1

      If you pay to rent a storage space, and I pay you for a copy of the key, if there's no contract or verbal prohibitions, why shouldn't I assume the storage space is available for me to use as well?

    19. Re:and the seller... by igb · · Score: 1
      If you buy a photo from a photographer are you allowed to post it on the internet?
      That would depend on what I bought, wouldn't it? If I were Corbis, and I bought a photograph from you, of course I'd have the right to post it to the Internet. And the right to license it in a variety of ways, including re-sale. Now, if I buy a laptop on EBay, what title do I have to the data on that laptop? I don't know. I doubt you know (especially under English law). I doubt there's a hard and fast answer.

      ian

    20. Re:and the seller... by freedom_india · · Score: 1
      Not this Govt. This Govt. doesn;t much differentiate between congressmen, senators or citizens. All mean the same, all can be searched/pwned at any time.

      I for one, welcome the New Bush Overlord! >

      --
      "Doing what i can, with what i have." ~ Burt Gummer
    21. Re:and the seller... by fizze · · Score: 1

      True, I am not familiar with UK laws, but I wouldnt say so.

      If he sold the laptop with all its contents and data, then all this now belongs to the buyer, and he can do with the stuff whatever he wants. In this case a lawyer could clearly argue that the means are justified, even if it damages the reputation of the seller, simply because the seller must have been aware of his personal data and whatnot on the laptop's drive.

      --
      Powerful is he who overpowers his temptations.
    22. Re:and the seller... by mblase · · Score: 1

      Amir, if you want to refund my money you know where to contact me, and this page will disappear forever.

      That's from the bottom of the web page. Sounds like extortion to me, no matter what else you might think about the validity of his motivation.

    23. Re:and the seller... by Firehed · · Score: 1

      And may I present Exhibit A: broken laptop, and Exhibit B: quirky digital photos found on the hard drive of broken laptop.

      --
      How are sites slashdotted when nobody reads TFAs?
    24. Re:and the seller... by scumbaguk · · Score: 1

      "If you buy a photo from a photographer are you allowed to post it on the internet?"

      Yes you are, if you bought the photo you own the rights. If the photo was licenced to you on the other hand then you would not.

      My aunt actualy runs a photo library, they travel the world going to photo markets and buying photos to add to their library and then charge them out to magazines when they need a shot of x celebrity or so and so location. They don't need to have actualy taken the photos to own them.

      The seller sold the "laptop" as a whole, I would take this to include any data stored on the laptop.

    25. Re:and the seller... by igb · · Score: 1
      Since you're playing at being a lawyer, it's worth pointing out that stating that something is defamatory when it isn't is itself defamatory of the author. As I doubt you're a libel lawyer, I'd be interested to know on what basis you believe it to be defamatory.

      ian

    26. Re:and the seller... by sydb · · Score: 1

      Dunno, according to Wikipedia, extortion requires threat or coercion. This has neither. Of course, WINAL.

      --
      Yours Sincerely, Michael.
    27. Re:and the seller... by lucifuge31337 · · Score: 1

      'If you buy a photo from a photographer are you allowed to post it on the internet?'

      That would depend on what I bought, wouldn't it?


      Yes it would. If he bought the photo, he could do anything he wants with it. If he bought a license for the photo, which is much more typical, then he could only do what the license specifies.

      Any works on this laptop could be construed as being under the copyright of the creator, even if that creator is the one who sold the laptop. I could see an argument that the creator's copyright was in fact violated by posting the content, if the transaction was meant as a hardware sale only. Of course, I could also see a flip side argument to this.

      Sometimes I wonder if I shouldn't have gone to law school so I could just argue for a living. But they wouldn't let me in after I passed an ethics test.

      --
      Do not fold, spindle or mutilate.
    28. Re:and the seller... by RaNdOm+OuTpUt · · Score: 0

      There's the argument that the threat is keeping the website up. But probably wouln't work as it's more of a reward. If it was "new picture a day until you pay", that would defenitly be a threat. So probably would work, since the average laywer is stupid.

      --
      13. Any legal action is absolutly excluded. (Pi World Ranking List rules)
    29. Re:and the seller... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      who broke the laptop

    30. Re:and the seller... by crossmr · · Score: 1

      except you might not have any evidence he's a teetotaller. Just because he wasn't drinking when he crashed into the pier doesn't mean he's a teetotallar and it doesn't mean it was his one sober day, but it could be a pertinent fact though as many people might assume that someone who would do that might be drunk at the time.

    31. Re:and the seller... by orkysoft · · Score: 1

      Reading the text on the auction screenshots, the seller says the laptop doesn't have a charger. If that doesn't make you suspect it has come into the possession of the seller via extra-legal means of appropriation, I don't know what does...

      --

      I suffer from attention surplus disorder.
    32. Re:and the seller... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good point. I chose a bad example. I was trying to demonstrate how the absolute truth could still be a slander. I should have waited until I finished the second cup of coffee.

    33. Re:and the seller... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      That's fascinating. However, it's English law, not American law, and no, in English law, truth is not a complete defense.

      Which is why people in Britain are frequently "tired and emotional", but never drunk.

      Mod parent down (-1, Americentric idiot)

    34. Re:and the seller... by Jussi+K.+Kojootti · · Score: 1
      Well, like I said, this only applies to jurisdictions i know: Courts do use common sense when there is no exact precedent in the law (and the commentaries) -- The questions they're going to ask are: "Did the previous owner mean to leave his passwords on the computer for others to use?" and "Did the buyer know or should he have known that they weren't left there for him to use.

      "Assuming" things (against common sense) will get you in trouble...

  7. 0-fill by bobby1234 · · Score: 0, Redundant

    here begins the discussion on the best way to 0 fill your harddrive..... 0000 no 101010 no 11111 no 000111000111

    1. Re:0-fill by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Putting your old hard drive under a big magnet should be better than filling it with 0's.

    2. Re:0-fill by Schraegstrichpunkt · · Score: 0, Redundant
      Dumbass, it's:
      while true ; do cat /dev/urandom > /dev/hda ; done
    3. Re:0-fill by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's a wonderful display of l33tness, but it's not that great advice, considering the tremendous user base that Unix-based laptops have. That doesn't quite do the same thing on a default install of Windows XP, which the laptop was running. The vast majority of users don't know how to open or use a command prompt, let alone how to properly erase a hard drive.

    4. Re:0-fill by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      l33tness ? He didn't even buffer it!

      use dd bs=512 not cat.........

    5. Re:0-fill by remembertomorrow · · Score: 1

      You should take a look at /usr/bin/dd

      Also (original poster), zero-fill doesn't guarantee unrecoverable data. Multiple overwrites (mentioned up above someplace) is the way to go.

      --
      Registered Linux user #421033
  8. Yawn. by robogun · · Score: 2, Interesting

    However, the link about the car seller at the bottom was much more entertaining.

    1. Re:Yawn. by ArsenneLupin · · Score: 1
      However, the link about the car seller at the bottom was much more entertaining.

      Couldn't find that link (maybe they rotate?). Care to post it here?

      Thanks

    2. Re:Yawn. by robogun · · Score: 4, Funny
    3. Re:Yawn. by pimpimpim · · Score: 1

      amazingly funny! thanx!

      --
      molmod.com - computing tips from a molecular modeling
    4. Re:Yawn. by lendude · · Score: 1

      Classic! You have to give that seller points: either he was fantastically naive about baiting, or he battled against great odds just to salvage the one or two possibly genuine queries coming his way!

      --
      "Get off the cross - we need the wood" - Tori Amos
    5. Re:Yawn. by ArsenneLupin · · Score: 1

      Excellent! Hilarious! Thanks for that link.

  9. Wow. by Koiu+Lpoi · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I agree about the cleaning of the harddrive, but this really seems like useless drama to me. Is this really news, or internet angst taken a bit too far?

    1. Re:Wow. by daeley · · Score: 1

      Is this really news, or internet angst taken a bit too far?

      These days, those are pretty much the same thing. ;)

      --
      I watched C-beams glitter in the dark near the Tannhauser gate.
    2. Re:Wow. by jsse · · Score: 1

      Because by reading stories as such we can pay attention to laptop privacy which would be otherwise neglected. By reading you guys comments I found stuffs about sector encryption and something useful which you'd not bother to look for until you need it.
      Don't blame us for not RTFA, most of time I found comments useful, informative, and sometime, more intelligent than the original post. :P

      I believe most of us hang around and read every story posted for similar reason right? :)

    3. Re:Wow. by Koiu+Lpoi · · Score: 1

      It saddens me that this is news. We used to have forumdrama, and now we have blogdrama - and it's making the news. The internet has allowed useless, petty drama to spread much much further than it should ever have. Some people need to just read The Four Agreements and get the hell over it.

    4. Re:Wow. by fm6 · · Score: 1

      Obviously a lot of people find this story interesting and amusing, even if you don't. Deal with it.

    5. Re:Wow. by Koiu+Lpoi · · Score: 1

      I'm allowed to comment that I don't like the story. Deal with it.

    6. Re:Wow. by fm6 · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      Sure, you have a constitutional right to be a twit. Don't let me stop you!

    7. Re:Wow. by johncadengo · · Score: 1

      Is this really news

      When was the last time you saw news on Slashdot?

      --
      My page.
  10. Boot and Nuke by mahesh_gharat · · Score: 5, Informative

    If you are selling/sending for repair, either your laptop or storage media, do not forget to take the backup and wipe out the entire content. Simply formatting/deleting the content may not help. The data will be still there, only the index (Allocation table) will be changed.
    You can use something like Darik's Boot and Nuke http://dban.sourceforge.net/ for deleting the content permanently.

    1. Re:Boot and Nuke by Jeremi · · Score: 2, Interesting
      You can use something like Darik's Boot and Nuke http://dban.sourceforge.net/ for deleting the content permanently.


      I noticed that the Disk Utility in recent releases of MacOS/X also has a paranoia-erase setting: you can tell it to overwrite a disk with zeroes once, seven times, or (for the tinfoil hat crowd) 35 times(!). It's a pretty slow process, though -- doing the 7x option took my G5 about 4 hours. I can almost see now why the military prefers to physically destroy the drives.

      --


      I don't care if it's 90,000 hectares. That lake was not my doing.
    2. Re:Boot and Nuke by fm6 · · Score: 2, Funny
      ...do not forget to take the backup and wipe out the entire content.
      With this kind of content, I think it makes sense to skip the backup step.
    3. Re:Boot and Nuke by dgatwood · · Score: 1
      As a policy, when selling a computer used, I simply buy a new hard drive. It doesn't make me as much money, but more often than not, it's worth the monetary loss to avoid having to copy gigs and gigs of audio files, install a fresh copy of the OS. reinstall all the apps, etc. In other words, it's a good idea even if you don't have anything to hide. If you do have something to hide....

      Replacement hard drive: $80. Screwing up and failing to back up critical data before you ship a machine: $10,000. Enduring public humiliation because you pissed off someone who now has a copy of your porn collection... priceless. There are some things money just can't buy. For everything else, there's MasterCard, now publicly held (NYSE ticker MA).

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    4. Re:Boot and Nuke by lon3st4r · · Score: 2, Interesting
      maybe he didn't have the sense enough to wipe the data clean; or maybe - because the system wasn't working - he didn't have the motivation enough to yank the hdd out, put it on another system - and wipe it there.

      the auction says that the laptop comes with all paperwork, but it might be a stolen laptop - so the police might be investigating that also. the price for that laptop configuration is quite a sweet deal!

      * lon3st4r *

    5. Re:Boot and Nuke by Minwee · · Score: 2, Funny
      "I can almost see now why the military prefers to physically destroy the drives."

      Well, that and the way that those guys destroy things is just plain fun.

    6. Re:Boot and Nuke by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      The military prefers to cleanse the drives with holy fire because if the bits have been in the same state very long, even if you rewrite the sectors umpteen times you can still get that original data (at great expense) using a scanning electron microscope. You can build a SEM for about five grand these days, from what I've heard.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    7. Re:Boot and Nuke by Aqua_boy17 · · Score: 1

      Boot Nukem?

      --
      What if the Hokey Pokey really is what it's all about?
  11. Why is this on the front page... by ystar · · Score: 3, Informative

    This isn't news. Anyone who reads Slashdot would hopefully know to delete the contents of their HDD before shipping it out to a stranger...then again, anyone who reads slashdot isn't likely to be selling a "broken" laptop - not when there's spare parts around and Linux to be installed.

    1. Re:Why is this on the front page... by ystar · · Score: 1

      And anyone who refreshes slashdot 15 times or more a day would know to rewrite the contents of any resold drives at least seven times to "really" prevent the data from being retrieved.

    2. Re:Why is this on the front page... by ajs318 · · Score: 1

      Nobody has ever recovered data that has been overwritten just once. It may have been possible to do, back in the days of 20MB 5.25in drives. Storage density has increased since then. That means the tracks wander less.

      All computer memory used to be magnetic, before they could make transistors small enough and cheap enough that it was viable to use flip-flops {SRAM} for anything bigger than registers, and with high enough input impedances so as not to discharge a tiny capacitor {DRAM} before there was time to recharge it. A weird and wonderful array of storage devices have been constructed with tape loops, revolving drums, discs and arrays of ferrite cores. No device has ever been built that used magnetic remanence phenomena to increase storage density; though this almost certainly would have been economically viable at some stage before solid-state memory took over.

      Even the data recovery specialists admit that they can't recover once-overwritten data.

      The criminal destruction of perfectly serviceable drives by the military is a propaganda exercise. It's saying to the enemy "We have the technology that could have recovered this". It's also saying "We eventually recovered the information from a used hard disk, and definitely not by torturing the suspect".

      --
      Je fume. Tu fumes. Nous fûmes!
    3. Re:Why is this on the front page... by HuguesT · · Score: 1

      At first I didn't believe you but there is a link supporting your claim.

    4. Re:Why is this on the front page... by digitalchinky · · Score: 1

      I'm not quite certain what you mean in your last paragraph - though having worked for the Defence Signals Directorate, I can assure you that hard drives are definitely physically destroyed, as well as monitors, all types of RAM, pretty much every circuit board that has an IC on it. (You may be in agreement, I just didn't understand your wording)

      You are right, the drive density is so tight these days that it is pretty much impractical to get any useful data by reading along the edges (though not impossible) Under Australian policies in which any classified material is involved, the hardware is fully destroyed. (Either shredded, crushed, furnace, or the myriad of other ways they take a sledge hammer to things)

      When doing tactical exercises that involve anyone not allied, there is always some means present to destroy any sensitive equipment should the need arise. This might involve small explosive charges, an axe, fire hose, etc...

      I think you'd be surprised how long the military holds on to things anyway, it's not at all uncommon to see or use functional equipment dating back to the 60's and 70's

  12. Extortion by Crasoum · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Extortion is basically what it boils down to; "Amir, if you want to refund my money you know where to contact me, and this page will disappear forever."

    The rest of the crap in the story is unverifiable from the information provided. It is just here-say.

    1. Re:Extortion by symbolset · · Score: 1
      But the photos are lovely and difficult to deny.

      For the buyer's sake I hope it's a stolen laptop 'cuz we're going to be hearing about this one for a long time.

      What this page needs are some ads to defer the poster's server costs.

      --
      Help stamp out iliturcy.
    2. Re:Extortion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "here-say"? No. You mean "hearsay", you moron. Think about it.

    3. Re:Extortion by Crasoum · · Score: 1

      Forgive my spelling, the understood meaning remains the same.

    4. Re:Extortion by Crasoum · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The photos are very difficult to deny, but all it proves is he does not know how to eliminate data.

      It is also doubtful the laptop is stolen, it probably is indeed Amir's.

      He also used a free service (Which supports AdSense if he took the time to set it up.), why would he need to worry about bandwidth?

    5. Re:Extortion by stevenm86 · · Score: 1

      Extortion? The information is already out there. Besides, if it was something the seller did not want to come out, he should have wiped the HD or not have commited ebay fraud in the first place.

    6. Re:Extortion by piquadratCH · · Score: 1
      Extortion is basically what it boils down to; "Amir, if you want to refund my money you know where to contact me, and this page will disappear forever."
      The funny thing about the Internet is, once you've put something in the web, it'll never disappear again. This holds especially for content like this. Poor little Amir will be hunted by this 'incident' for a few years to come I'm afraid, whether the site is taken down or not.
    7. Re:Extortion by Crasoum · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Which goes back to where's the proof he committed fraud, the item was shipped, the person was able to access the hard drive (I know there are plenty of ways of doing so with and without a working laptop.), but there was no documentation as to what was borked on the computer.

      He simply stated that it was broke.

      No pictures of the broken item, no description of what was broke. Just a statement that the ram and DVD-Rom was wrong, again, -hear-say.

      For all I can tell, it was missing a charger which can lead to all sorts of assumptions.

      The extortion part comes in to play with the statement that boils down to you pay, it goes away.

    8. Re:Extortion by ShellFish · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Funny how you simply assume the seller is telling the truth. If you read the reported story (especially quotes from him) and look at the original posting of the eBay auction, you'll see that there are many inconsistencies (i.e., the seller is lying in one of these two places). The seller has a -3 feedback rating, and this isn't the only buyer who has claimed to have been scammed by him. The pictures and other data are internally consistent with the blog posting -- i.e., not a bunch of random cell phone pictures scoured from the 'Net.

      You throw that word "unverifiable" around as if it's the end of the argument. There are many ways to gain confidence in the soure of information. Here, the internal clues and external clues combine to give me pretty high confidence that the buyer is telling the truth. And you know, "hear-say" doesn't mean it's automatically not true or unverifiable, it just means that you have to use your critical thinking skills to figure out what is more likely true.

      You call this extortion. In reality the seller sold a computer that was not accurately described, did not even work, shipped it two months late, and refused t a refund despite repeated requests and even lied about where he was to get out of it. The buyer is now posting the truth out there and asking, again, to have just his money back. It isn't extortion if all you do is tell the truth and ask for your money back so that a fraud can be undone..

    9. Re:Extortion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I found the revenge site the other evening via Metafilter, the refund-my-money-and-this-site-disappears-forever part only appeared since then. There was also a rather lengthy comment section with some 1000+ posts at the time, (which the site now notes was removed.)

    10. Re:Extortion by fm6 · · Score: 1
      Jeez dude, don't ever resort to a live of crime. You'd return the kidnapping victim, then demand a ransom.

      Everybody on the planet has already seen Amir's embarassing photos. If the dude wanted to extort money, he'd demand a payoff before he posted the photos.

    11. Re:Extortion by Crasoum · · Score: 1

      I am missing the place where it shows his -3 feedback, I see him having 50% positive feedback however from the listed site, -after- the auction ended.

      And you are correct, I do have to use critical thinking skills, I just used them to point out what is possible and plausible from what I saw and interpreted.

      Does not mean I am correct, does not even mean I am remotely close to the truth.

      The only two people who know the truth, aside from divine entities, are the buyer and seller.

    12. Re:Extortion by bm_luethke · · Score: 1

      Extortion generally needs an illegal act in the attempt to gain what you want.

      If the guy is telling the truth about the laptop and it is not illegal for him to post the pictures (I don't have any idea what the law is) then there should be no problem. In fact, I would say way to go. That *should* be part of free speech and consumer laws.

      This is closer to a store selling you equipment and you protesting with pictures/signs out front until they refund your money. If your claim is true (in this case the laptop was defective and he refused to refund the money) - oh well, perfectly legal and should be (well, at least in the US, I don't know about the UK). He sold him the stuff so it's now his to do with as he pleases.

      If the buyer is lieing trying to get his laptop for free, then he should get screwed (and it would then be extortion, the illegal act being libel).

      I don't know which way it is, one is funny and a person getting what they deserve, the other the buyer needs to get hit with a baseball bat. Of course, if it turns out the buyer is lieing, he is probably financially ruined from damages as wide an exposure as this is getting.

      --
      ------- Sorry about the spelling, I suffer from two problems. Dyslexia makes it difficult to spell well, lazy makes it
    13. Re:Extortion by Crasoum · · Score: 1

      Still extortion, assuming it's based upon a lie, weither or not the damage is undoable.

    14. Re:Extortion by Crasoum · · Score: 1

      I agree completely with your assessment on extortion and consumer rights. Since I made the post have gone back and forth on how I feel about the issue.

      I still feel that there is some unresolved parts though and default to only the buyer and seller really knows what is true or not.

      And yes, if the buyer is lying, that is really a big bite of suck.

    15. Re:Extortion by fm6 · · Score: 1

      Crack a book dude. To extort somebody you have to demand something using threats or intimidation. Telling a lie is not an element. Which is beside the point, since an obvious lampoon is not a lie.

    16. Re:Extortion by Crasoum · · Score: 1

      "Amir, if you want to refund my money you know where to contact me, and this page will disappear forever."

      I interpreted that as intimidation; he demanded money, to make the website "disappear". Although coercion may be a better word to use, it still works as extortion.

      Regardless, I've been shown a whole slew of stuff that countered my initial opinion from full doubt to needing more information to make my decision.

    17. Re:Extortion by fm6 · · Score: 1

      OK, I missed that statement. Does indeed count as extortion — though rather inept extortion.

    18. Re:Extortion by Crasoum · · Score: 0

      It's late and both our minds are tired.

      At least that's my story and I'm sticking to it.

      But thanks for the responces, it let me kill some time.

    19. Re:Extortion by servognome · · Score: 1

      Extortion generally needs an illegal act in the attempt to gain what you want.

      No, extortion just needs to involve coercion, whether it is legal or illegal does not matter. The demand is the criminal offense.

      This is closer to a store selling you equipment and you protesting with pictures/signs out front until they refund your money. If your claim is true (in this case the laptop was defective and he refused to refund the money) - oh well, perfectly legal and should be (well, at least in the US, I don't know about the UK). He sold him the stuff so it's now his to do with as he pleases

      If you protest with signs in front there is no crime. If you demand the store give you money with the threat of protest then it can criminal. The former is freedom of speech, the latter is coercion.

      --
      D6 63 0D 70 89 81 BB 8E 7B 7C 5F 5D 54 EA AB 73
    20. Re:Extortion by harvardian · · Score: 1

      Not really. Hearsay is when you pass on unverified information. In this case, "heresay" is more accurate. He's there with the broken laptop, and saying how much it sucks.

    21. Re:Extortion by sharp-bang · · Score: 1

      Amir, if you want to refund my money you know where to contact me, and this page will disappear forever.

      Waaaay too late for that.

      --
      #!
    22. Re:Extortion by suv4x4 · · Score: 1

      Extortion is basically what it boils down to; "Amir, if you want to refund my money you know where to contact me, and this page will disappear forever."

      Oh shit, good thing Mr. Morale is here to lecture us about extortion.

      The guy who bought the laptop was lied about the machine specs and received a non-working hardware versus a promise for a working hardware. He requested his money back *repeatedly* over a long period of time.

      That's good money wasted on some liar schmuck who thinks screwing people over the Internet is fun. Normally, the buyer decides to return the favor.

      What would you do if you're screwed out of good $600 and all you receive is a pile of wasted hardware and a disk full of funny content. Use whatever you got for your money, of course.

    23. Re:Extortion by jginspace · · Score: 1

      "The rest of the crap in the story is unverifiable from the information provided. It is just here-say.

      There's a wealth of supporting information. Start your quest here: http://tofangsazan-the.blogspot.com/ ... seems like the papers caught up with him and he admits that the laptop passed through his hands. It had scan of his passport and his CV on it. If the paper had talked to him (granted I can't see any wording that suggests any interview was face-to-face) and the pictures of Amir [i]were not[/i] a likeness of the crook they spoke to then we'd know about it. The police complaint ties it up. Would there have been a complaint if the subject featured in the pics [i]was not[/i] the scammer?

      Passport scans, name, pics, place of work, ebay logins, transactions (2+) ... and some old-fashioned journalism ... how [i]verifiable[/i] does your average Slashdot dilettante need it?

    24. Re:Extortion by mlk · · Score: 1

      Alas that is not true. A friend, after a drinking large amounts of beer, got giggy with a teddy bear. A picture was taken, and published to a number of website.
      Alas I can no longer find a copy of this picture. :(

      --
      Wow, I should not post when knackered.
    25. Re:Extortion by geminidomino · · Score: 1

      By that logic, if I tell Best Buy that I'm taking my business elsewhere because they won't fix/replace my equipment despite my being dumb enough to buy that plan, it's a crime.

      WTF?

    26. Re:Extortion by ParrotDroppings · · Score: 1

      It can't be extortion because the website itself may vanish, but the cached copies at Google et al. will not.

      --
      Free ?! Does that mean I can't get a Discount ?!
      This message was /.'ed
    27. Re:Extortion by Crasoum · · Score: 1

      And I said "from the information provided" which tends to mean the link to the story, and any links from story to the source.

      I've been steeped in the story as of the last few posts, and have differed my opinion, but I also had little desire to read past the story and it's source (as well as any links on the source, of which this one was not on there); so thank you for the added link. However the original story and link from it did have very very little proof other then what someone said was wrong, same with your link actually, it just speaks about the hear-say as well.

      Also, all the papers use "Broken" or "Allegedly broken" as a reference to the laptop. So I still default to only the seller and buyer knows the truth.

      Although lack of evidence, doesn't mean lack of guilt.

    28. Re:Extortion by GodaiYuhsaku · · Score: 1

      How far should a person go to prove something? The website isn't a court of law. Why should he bother taking a picture of the ram and cd-rom? It isn't hearsay from my understanding of the term. "Hearsay: Testimony given by a witness who tells second or third hand information" from http://www.jud.state.ct.us/legalterms.htm#Hearsay This isn't second or third hand information for the buyer. He can directly observe the facts. So it isn't hearsay. For us to claim that its broken would be hearsay, but not him. Of course INAL. And how can a picture show that a laptop doesnt work? Its not as if the screen is shattered, any attempt to show that the laptop doesn't work in picture format will most likely look like a laptop that is turned off. The only part i agree with as far as the privacy aspects are the people who are not the buyer. They are a 3rd party.

    29. Re:Extortion by vorpal22 · · Score: 1

      It had a scan of his passport information page on it, which, IIRC, he scanned to modify his DOB for false identification purposes. It also had a lot of his personal information (e.g. banking) on it, showing that it clearly wasn't stolen.

    30. Re:Extortion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you mean, "hear-say"
      i hear it, then i say it.

    31. Re:Extortion by Crasoum · · Score: 1

      Which I agreed to. :)

    32. Re:Extortion by Crasoum · · Score: 1

      As far as I have been concerned, it is indeed unverified information that the laptop was broken upon receipt. Does not mean I don't believe the story, simply I don't see the "evidence".

    33. Re:Extortion by Crasoum · · Score: 1

      In a story, not to far; for me to not have at least some doubt as to the authenticity of the story it requires more then "It was broke, so now I'm going to ruin your life".

      I've gone back and forth on how I feel on wither or not he did it, but I have not gone back on my opinion that I believe the evidence is lacking.

      After all, if it was me, I wouldn't want my name plastered all over the net because I was an idiot and didn't destroy my hard drive, especially if the laptop WAS working when I sent it!

    34. Re:Extortion by Crasoum · · Score: 1

      Or the buyer is lying and using the stuff on the hard drive to extort a free laptop, GENIUS!

      I really have gone from thinking one thing or another, but have remained static that I would need more information to make a decision, and that there are only TWO people who know the truth; the buyer and seller. The rest is an exercise in assumption which I exercised liberally.

    35. Re:Extortion by suv4x4 · · Score: 1

      Or the buyer is lying and using the stuff on the hard drive to extort a free laptop, GENIUS!

      I really have gone from thinking one thing or another, but have remained static that I would need more information to make a decision, and that there are only TWO people who know the truth; the buyer and seller. The rest is an exercise in assumption which I exercised liberally.


      As a start you may notice the seller has status -2 and his account was terminated, while the buyer has over 70 good experiences with customers and one negative.

      You could also read up on the rest of the information and apply critical thinking.

      But if you don't you can speculate around aimlessly, like you do.

    36. Re:Extortion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      do i need to copy the my.rules and netbios.rules files too?

      From the feedback info on the seller, it looks like he was using multiple accounts and giving himself positive feedback. There was also mention of someone else claiming that the same person sold them an ipod and they never got it. So, I'm leaning towards believing he's a scammer. Just wanted to throw that info out to be factored into the equation here.

    37. Re:Extortion by Crasoum · · Score: 1

      The rest of the information always leads back to the buyer's statement, and the buyer's own word against the seller's, which holds about as much water as a sieve.

      It is a circumstantial argument at best from the information provided through ALL the various links.

      I've already stated that I doubt the buyer is lying, but I also stated that I doubt the "proof" provided. My speculation is hardly aimless, just pointing out the lack of anything substantial, other then words, as evidence.

      Now if I wanted to follow the story aimlessly, without applying critical thinking, I'd have agreed outright to someone's word against another's without dissecting what was provided. As well as kept my opinion static as opposed to listening to other's arguments and deciding hey maybe I don't know the whole story, I'll move from strongly disbelieving to mildly disbelieving but needing more proof.

      Which is really where I'm at, I mildly disbelieve but with evidence could easily believe what was stated.

    38. Re:Extortion by Crasoum · · Score: 1

      Yea I saw that, and don't really doubt he could scam, but I also have the thought the people could just as well be lying (doesn't mean I don't believe it, but it's entirely possible.)

      The entire argument went from me believing the website was extortion (which I still feel that way), to thinking the website is extortion with probable cause and he probably deserves it. Doesn't mean I believe everything stated either though. :)

  13. Sick by deafpluckin · · Score: 1, Interesting

    This kind of "revenge" is a bit sick. Is it really worth the money to ruin this guy's life?

    1. Re:Sick by Pantero+Blanco · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I doubt it's about the money. Scamming/cheating/robbing people REALLY pisses them off, even when the amount of goods involved is trivial.

      I won't blame anyone for exposing a scumball after the scumball tried to screw him.

      And why are the police getting involved, anyway?

    2. Re:Sick by TorAvalon · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Because, like you, they don't know the whole story unless they get involved.

    3. Re:Sick by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Was it really worth scamming someone out of £350 to ruin his own life?

    4. Re:Sick by big+ben+bullet · · Score: 1

      Oooowwwhh yes! It's worth it!

      I would've done exactly the same thing. Scamming, vandalising, stealing, etc.. all pisses me off pretty bad. (I might regret doing so afterwards... but revenge can taste so sweeeeet.)

      I think that Amir dude learned a valuable lesson (the hard way). I bet he'll think twice before trying to scam someone again. And who knows, this story may even scare of some potential future scammer.

    5. Re:Sick by C.W.+Moss · · Score: 1

      Maybe it was a stolen laptop; in that case it seems the measures taken are quite unjustifiable.

    6. Re:Sick by orkysoft · · Score: 1

      If you read the auction text, it comes without a charger, so it probably is stolen.

      --

      I suffer from attention surplus disorder.
    7. Re:Sick by C.W.+Moss · · Score: 1

      Well in that case, I think it's a pretty crappy situation for the poor guy. Maybe there's gonna be a counter-counter-attack... : )

  14. I'm vindicated! by pongo000 · · Score: 1

    After seeing this, I no longer feel so anal about running old floppies through the shredder, old CD-ROMs in the microwave, and dissassembling old hard drives and smashing the platters.

    1. Re:I'm vindicated! by Vellmont · · Score: 1


      and dissassembling old hard drives and smashing the platters.


      If the hard drive is still operational, just run dban on it and it will be completely unreadable.

      --
      AccountKiller
    2. Re:I'm vindicated! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I sent ~20 lbs of hd platters to the aluminum reclycling center. 10 -15 full height drives, they weren't mine but I was curious if the NSA could reconstruct them all shuffled up or maybe once they had been turned into budweiser can. I guess glass platters are even better.
      If anyone finds out about my hamster powered vibrator then they will have to betray their methods to reconstruct the data in order to expose me - a risk I am willing to take.

    3. Re:I'm vindicated! by Splab · · Score: 1

      Microwaveing cd-roms is dangerous isn't it?

      Oh and do remember to wipe the drives before smashing them - I personally use a live cd and:

      dd if=/dev/urandom of=/dev/hda

      Remember to umount the drive first though :-)

    4. Re:I'm vindicated! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So I've been reading about your hamster powered vibrator...

    5. Re:I'm vindicated! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      "After seeing this, I no longer feel so anal about running old floppies through the shredder, old CD-ROMs in the microwave, and dissassembling old hard drives and smashing the platters."
      What's on your hard drive?
    6. Re:I'm vindicated! by airlynx · · Score: 1

      I can only imagine what sort of porn you have on disk if you go through this much trouble to destroy it.

      --
      I got into Linux for the free beer, but nobody seems to have any
    7. Re:I'm vindicated! by pongo000 · · Score: 1
      Microwaveing cd-roms is dangerous isn't it?


      Six seconds pretty much destroys the media without melting the plastic. Don't go longer than that, though, or you'll make a stinky mess.
  15. But did it run Linux? (no) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This wouldn't have happened as easily if the device in question had run Linux!
    Then again, the seller then would maybe have some common sense...

  16. Eraser w/Nuke Disk Option by CodeBuster · · Score: 4, Informative

    The Eraser program is an excellent and free way to securely wipe your hardrives prior to sale of your computer in addition to providing everyday secure wiping services including secure file deletion, free space, and swap file wiping w/multiple overwrite pattern options. I have no financial interest in this company whatsoever, but I have found this program to be a useful addition to my toolbox so you may want to check it out.

  17. The "Chicken Shop" by TX297 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Heh, I think I know where that place is... looks like it's on that road heading into the toppling phone booths in Kingston... I've eaten at that place a couple of times but the shops in the background don't look right, but I haven't been there for a couple of years so who knows? It's possibly a chain, but the interior furnishings are exactly the same. Mod me down, this comment is useless.

    1. Re:The "Chicken Shop" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      From the sign that says "Hollywood Fried Chicken" in one of the photos, I suppose that we can deduce that the fast food place is called "Hollywood Fried Chicken." Maybe this one? Don't know for sure.

    2. Re:The "Chicken Shop" by pimpimpim · · Score: 1

      £ 3.50 for a doner kebab, it's pretty clear where he got his inspiration from in trying to sell overpriced stuff. Jeez man, more than 5 euro for a doner, what a scam!!! And it doesn't really look like a top location to ask for such prices. Or maybe if it's a doner plate and they add extra fries and salad and stuff, but it's hard to see on the picture. Or maybe these are normal prices in the UK/london, and I will wonder even more how normal working-class people can survive out there as the income doesn't really seem to scale along with the prices.

      --
      molmod.com - computing tips from a molecular modeling
    3. Re:The "Chicken Shop" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah.. those are normal prices for the UK. They don't call this place "treasure island" for nothing.

    4. Re:The "Chicken Shop" by ajs318 · · Score: 1

      For London, maybe.

      The first time I went to London, I innocently asked a woman in a shop if her pricing gun was broken, because she wanted 27p for a Kit Kat.

      --
      Je fume. Tu fumes. Nous fûmes!
  18. You've been missing out by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Lotts of bachelorette parties, etc. Pretty hot.

  19. Obligatory link by mincognito · · Score: 3, Funny

    When it comes to repaying unscrupulous ebayers, nothing beats...the P-P-P-Powerbook!

    http://www.p-p-p-powerbook.com/

    1. Re:Obligatory link by tinkerton · · Score: 1

      would it be funny if the two stories were actually two stages of the same bigger story? Just a little bit. for a moment.

  20. Horrible by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This kind of revenge is way out of proportion. If the story is at all true I hope the police do become involved. You rip me off so I destroy your life? Childish buyer. If he did get ripped off he totally deserved it and more.

    I mean think about it. Think about how much the laptop is worth and how much trouble this would have caused.

    Assuming the story is true, the seller deserved a slap on the wrist. The buyer deserves jail time.

    1. Re:Horrible by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd say he did buy the data...

    2. Re:Horrible by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sup, Amir, bro'!

    3. Re:Horrible by Pantero+Blanco · · Score: 1

      Assuming the story is true, this is the best way in the world to handle scammers. Expose them in a way that'll attract many people so that they won't, and likely can't, screw over anyone else. The guy was screwing strangers and picked the wrong one. I have no sympathy for him.

      If the story isn't true, the buyer will probably be hit with libel, and (I'd say) deserves worse for destroying an innocent man's life.

    4. Re:Horrible by thegrassyknowl · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Assuming the story is true, the seller deserved a slap on the wrist. The buyer deserves jail time.

      It's people like you who are the reason the world is so fucked up. The seller deserved a slap on the wrist... what's with that?

      Assuming the story is true, he knowingly ripped someone off and refused to make good with it. That is not slap on the wrist-worthy. Public shame is too good for him. Also, his rampant stupidity should make him a prime candidate for a darwin award but it is unlikely he will ever win one.

      Stupid, shonky people are rewarded for screwing the hard working public and when hard working public tries to get a little of their own back then they get in trouble. Fuck that. I spent all of yesterday fighting a court battle because stupid shonky corporation was sending me bills for service that I never requested or used. When the bills went unpaid they sued me! Of course, I lost a day's income and the court only made them pay court costs - no compensation for my time! Screw that.

      I say publicly shame the shammers!

      --
      I drink to make other people interesting!
    5. Re:Horrible by mattydont · · Score: 1

      if you are talking about the "service" i am thinking of, then porn dialers are indeed bad.

    6. Re:Horrible by thegrassyknowl · · Score: 1

      Porn dialers are fucked, but people are stupid for clicking "install me" are not they???

      I was being sued by a real estate agent of all people for the services of cleaning the property I was leasing from them. Funny that, because it was clean when we moved and they didn't contest that fact at all. They just wanted to try and charge me for cleaning.

      Winning that battle restored my faith that there is some sanity left in the world.

      --
      I drink to make other people interesting!
    7. Re:Horrible by Vo0k · · Score: 1

      Now you can do one thing more. Unless the court has ordered otherwise, you can reveal the names of the plaintiffs (ok, I'm not interested in YOUR name) so that we could send our love to said company, or make sure to take proper attitude in business contacts with them. Don't hold it, tell us!

      --
      Anagram("United States of America") == "Dine out, taste a Mac, fries"
    8. Re:Horrible by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Stupid, shonky people are rewarded for screwing the hard
      > working public and when hard working public tries to get a
      > little of their own back then they get in trouble.

      The hard working public does not buy their stuff at eBay, unless they're more stupid and shonky then the sellers.

      You buy at eBay, you get shafted up the kazoo with a 10 ft. pole for all I care, you asked for it. The buyer is the only one being stupid here, the seller just used eBay for what everyone else uses it for, selling trash.

      Jailtime is not good enough for Ebay buyers, I'm all in favor of chemical sterilization. Let's help Darwin along a bit.

      Punishing eBay sellers for selling crap is like instating capital punishment for children cheating at bonkers.

    9. Re:Horrible by nytmare · · Score: 1

      Assuming

      It's people like you who are the reason the world is so fucked up.

  21. just in case anyone is interested... by AxemRed · · Score: 4, Informative

    Here's a link to the finished auction.

    1. Re:just in case anyone is interested... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      why would you buy an item off a seller with a score of -2, and only a 25% positive feedback rating? and with such BAD comments as well!

    2. Re:just in case anyone is interested... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or who denegrates his employees, can't capitalize at the beginning of sentences (no offense to parent poster), can't spell, and can't be bothered to spend a little time on a good auction for a $700 item?

      Greed. Whatever anyone thinks of the seller, the buyer is an idiot.

  22. How to make sure your data is not readable by iceco2 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The Israeli Army uses the only fool proof method I know for erasing data off magentic hardrives and is made up of 2 steps:
    A. run the Harddrive through a Powerfull Degauser (a rapidly changing electro-Magnet)
    B. Shred the Hard drive into pieces less then one square milimeter in size.

    However this system may be hard to come by for most of us, and tends to harm the hard drive.

    Writing a set of zeros on a sensative file is much better than deleting it but not necessarly
    enough, because:
    a. your OS may decide to move your file to another location on the disk.
    b. Even after writing once or twice over the data, It still may be recoverable, especially
          if you use constant zeros(or ones).

    Writing random data several times is a better method, but is most be done over the entire
    hard drive and in sevral passes over the entire hard drive,
    since modern harddrives have a cache mecahnism(as well as one in the OS), so If
    some one writes over the first sector of a hard drive 20 times, chances are the hard drive
    actually got something physiclly written to it only once.

    several tools for securly deleting data available on the net, I would not trust
    my good reputation on any tool which securly deletes specific files but only on
    those which wipe your disk clean,
    these too may not protect you 100% becasue modern hard drive have a feature to correct(re-Map) bad-sectors automaticly, With this feature if the hard drive fails
    to access a certain sector sevral times it will stop using it and send and use
    a diffrent secotr instead(reserved in advance for this purpose and not normally accessable).
    The damaged secotr may still contain private data after hard drive is wiped clean.

    In short if you want to be truely safe use the Degause and shred Method.

          Don't be paranoid
                  Me.

    1. Re:How to make sure your data is not readable by techno-vampire · · Score: 4, Informative
      There's another 100% secure way to wipe all the data from a hard disk, and it only has one step:

      Drop it in an electric furnace and let it melt.

      --
      Good, inexpensive web hosting
    2. Re:How to make sure your data is not readable by aerthling · · Score: 1

      I remember reading somewhere (an APC magazine, I think) that a bullet in the platter was very effective. Anyone tried this method? ;)

    3. Re:How to make sure your data is not readable by Yaztromo · · Score: 1
      Writing random data several times is a better method, but is most be done over the entire hard drive and in sevral passes over the entire hard drive, since modern harddrives have a cache mecahnism(as well as one in the OS), so If some one writes over the first sector of a hard drive 20 times, chances are the hard drive actually got something physiclly written to it only once.

      Any properly written secure erase application will be sure to set the cache write-through flag so that this does happen. AFAIK, all modern hard drives and OS's support a flag to bypass all hardware and software disk caches for just this sort of reason.

      Yaz.

    4. Re:How to make sure your data is not readable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >In short if you want to be truely safe use the Degause and shred Method.

      Your imagination seems limited - how about an industrial furnace (think steel foundries)? Or super-cooling and then grinding into dust? The center of the sun also seems like a safe place to retire your hard drive. Nuking them (not with your microwave over, but with actual nukes) would probably do the trick as well.

      OK, degauss (Gauss spins in his grave while you gravely misspell his name) and shred might be cheapest, but honestly, if you can shred down to less than a square millimeter, do you really have to de-gauss first?

    5. Re:How to make sure your data is not readable by Mr.+Hankey · · Score: 1

      Interesting, although I've read that the US military uses thermite to melt the drives into slag. That's fairly foolproof too.

      --
      GPL: Free as in will
    6. Re:How to make sure your data is not readable by farquharsoncraig · · Score: 1
      You can use shred. It's got some pretty nice options.

      $ man shred

      I usually do this:

      $ shred -fuxz /mnt/hard_drive
    7. Re:How to make sure your data is not readable by farquharsoncraig · · Score: 1
      I should have said:

      $ find /mnt/hard_drive -type f -print0 | xargs -0ri shred -fuxz {}
    8. Re:How to make sure your data is not readable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      shred is ok, except if you're using a journalled FS like reiser, xfs, ext3, etc.

    9. Re:How to make sure your data is not readable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can achieve the same effect simply by smashing both sides of the hard drives outer case with a hammer. If you hit it hard enough and in enough spots around the areas the platters live you will shatter the majority of the platters. The problem with this method is that someone with enough time and money can still recover some data from the chunks. It's a giant puzzle that has to be put back together, and due to the data densities it's possible that some sensitives files with be fine on some of the larger chunks. As other posters have mentioned, thermite is a better solution.

    10. Re:How to make sure your data is not readable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      " if you can shred down to less than a square millimeter, do you really have to de-gauss first? "

      um.. I'm pretty sure that that's the joke.

    11. Re:How to make sure your data is not readable by Eivind+Eklund · · Score: 2, Informative
      Unforunately, the writethrough flag often don't work correctly. At least hard disk manufacturers used to ignore it routinely in order to get better benchmarks, and those that made real high-availability systems (think telephone companies and big databases) had to order drives with special firmware.

      Eivind.

      --
      Doubting the existence of evolution is like doubting the existence of China: It just shows that you're uninformed.
    12. Re:How to make sure your data is not readable by Eivind+Eklund · · Score: 1
      One of my friends used to work as a service tech for a large company with security requirements; they used shred to mm size, then burn at several thousand degrees.

      Eivind.

      --
      Doubting the existence of evolution is like doubting the existence of China: It just shows that you're uninformed.
    13. Re:How to make sure your data is not readable by 91degrees · · Score: 1

      Simply writing several gigabyte files of random data to fill up space should deal with this adequately, especially since the person retriving the data is only going to use standard software tools to get the data off. When the cache fills up the data will be written to disk.

    14. Re:How to make sure your data is not readable by teal_ · · Score: 1

      Might not be all that environmentally sound :) I've taken drives apart and physically destroyed them, or if I wouldn't be too chagrined if somehow the data were recovered, bent all the pins beyond repair and dunked the drive in water for a few hours before tossing them out.

    15. Re:How to make sure your data is not readable by Detritus · · Score: 1

      Thermite is normally used in emergencies, like your position is being overrun by the enemy and you have to destroy all sensitive equipment.

      --
      Mea navis aericumbens anguillis abundat
    16. Re:How to make sure your data is not readable by TractorBarry · · Score: 2, Informative

      Where I work our machines are leased and when it's time to have them replaced then, before returning them, I always wipe the drive by using a Knoppix CD.

      To do this simply boot from the Knoppix CD, open a terminal and issue the following command:

      shred -vz -n 30 /dev/hda

      Then it's just a metter of leaving the machine to it (this can take quite a while depending on the machines power)

      Repeat as necessary for the number of drives in the box.

      Of course the data may still be recoverable but this method's "good enough" for my purposes. It's also 100% more effort than most of the other people I work with use !

      --
      Sky subscribers are morons. They pay to be advertised at !
    17. Re:How to make sure your data is not readable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Zend studio is great!

      I still think both sides in the pal/is conflict are at fault though. Frankly I'm tired of the entire conflict. They should stop.

    18. Re:How to make sure your data is not readable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Why is everybody so obsessed with the plight of Palestinians?

      Because the US Taxpayer is paying for it.

    19. Re:How to make sure your data is not readable by StrawberryFrog · · Score: 1

      Surely a few hours stuck amongst red-hot coals would do just as well?

      --

      My Karma: ran over your Dogma
      StrawberryFrog

    20. Re:How to make sure your data is not readable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So we should justify existance on the about of IP produced?

      Sorry, you have not created enough to exist. Good bye.

    21. Re:How to make sure your data is not readable by Keebler71 · · Score: 3, Funny

      Admit it... You watched LOTR last night didn't you!

      --
      "It takes considerable knowledge just to realize the extent of your own ignorance." - Thomas Sowell
    22. Re:How to make sure your data is not readable by geminidomino · · Score: 1

      Damn you. First you make me spew coffee out of my nose. Then I look up and see that it was modded "+5 Insightful" and do it AGAIN.

      You rat bastard. "It tends to harm the hard drive." Damn, that was good

    23. Re:How to make sure your data is not readable by geminidomino · · Score: 1

      $ shred -fuxz /mnt/hard_drive

      Now I know I'm tired. I read that phonetically and thought "Yes, yes it does"

    24. Re:How to make sure your data is not readable by johansalk · · Score: 1

      "B. Shred the Hard drive into pieces less then one square milimeter in size. However this system may be hard to come by for most of us, and tends to harm the hard drive." Really? Who would've thunk it!

    25. Re:How to make sure your data is not readable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Amir? Is that you? How was the planeride?

    26. Re:How to make sure your data is not readable by Kalinago · · Score: 1

      That is not completely failproof. It's better to dismount the drive, grab the disk with the gravity gun and dip'n churn it around in a pool of nail polish. For extra safety, replace all bytes with little FF's by engraving with a Dremmel (using a firm, regular circular motion please).

      This should do the trick. And its cheaper too.

      ---

    27. Re:How to make sure your data is not readable by spyrochaete · · Score: 1

      If you're going to the trouble of obliterating every sector of a hard drive, zeroing is not a secure way of erasing data. Simply zeroing bits does not sufficiently dull the magnetic storage. The best way is to first invert every 1 to a 0 to try to reverse the magnetic record, and then overwrite the disk a few times (DOD does it 7 times) with random bits.

      Of course, this is only if you want to retain the hard drive for use or resale.

    28. Re:How to make sure your data is not readable by penguinbrat · · Score: 1

      cat /dev/zero > /dev/hda

    29. Re:How to make sure your data is not readable by hcdejong · · Score: 1

      One disk to 0wn them all?

    30. Re:How to make sure your data is not readable by finalrain · · Score: 1

      Why not make some DBAN discs? The CDs load up faster than Knoppix, require less user intervention, have more options than shred (AFAIK anyway -- does shred let you use a seed file?), and you can start wiping the next machine less than 45 seconds after you start wiping.

      I hate to have my Knoppix discs tied up on hardware I'm about to get rid of anyway.

      --
      -- It is no measure of health to be well adjusted to a profoundly sick society.
    31. Re:How to make sure your data is not readable by metlin · · Score: 1


      That ought to have been, "Admit it... You read LOTR last night didn't you!" :-)

    32. Re:How to make sure your data is not readable by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      It really doesn't matter because there's probably no drive with more than 32MB cache and I've personally never seen one with more than 16MB. The only way this could POSSIBLY be an issue is if the writes are repeated for a single sector consecutively. It is better design to write over the entire drive n times than to sequentially write each sector n times because this way someone coming in halfway through the process and shutting off your computer doesn't have access to half of your data.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    33. Re:How to make sure your data is not readable by Keebler71 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Cool! When did the book come out?! ;)

      --
      "It takes considerable knowledge just to realize the extent of your own ignorance." - Thomas Sowell
    34. Re:How to make sure your data is not readable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, where I work (a university), we disassemble the HDDs, freeze the platters in liquid nitrogen, and shatter them. Modestly entertaining, and highly effective?

    35. Re:How to make sure your data is not readable by zx-15 · · Score: 1

      If you read man pages of shred. You would actually discover that shred doesn't delete data that well from journaling file system such as ext3 and ReiserFS, plus mentioned somewhere in the thread above disk caching can reduce your write operations on disk surface to write operations inside disk cache, which makes shred just as effective as rm - so what's the point of using it? Also here mentioned a nice way to wipe the hard drive, the only downside is - it wipes whole partitions.

    36. Re:How to make sure your data is not readable by techno-vampire · · Score: 1
      It probably would, but don't call me Shirley.

      Seriously, I've heard of DoD and other places with high security concerns melting down the platters on dead hard drives just to be sure they're unreadable.

      --
      Good, inexpensive web hosting
    37. Re:How to make sure your data is not readable by RuneB · · Score: 1

      True for reiserfs, but XFS only logs metadata to the journal. ext3 also only logs metadata with the default options.

      The filesystem doesn't matter, of course, when using shred on the entire drive.

      --
      dtach - A tiny program that emulates the detach feat
    38. Re:How to make sure your data is not readable by davidsyes · · Score: 1

      Anybody buying a used laptop should go and buy a NEW hard disk. They're fairly cheap from some surplus computer stores.

      It's possible to buy 10 and 20 GB disks fairly easily, at reasonable prices, and, and, the best part is not having to worry about whether or how many times the l/t was dropped and how long it'll be before the disk dies, nevermind the prediction software that may be (Linux) provided.

      Best of all, by having a NEW rather than a used disk is the relative unlikelihood of receiving a disk that has "call back to me" and lowjack and other stuff on it. The people buying laptops sometimes are not very savvy, and just start using them without cleaning out the registry, deleting macros, uninstalling the existing communications/surfing software....

      Unless the stores get hammered by manufacturers, new but reasonably cheap, spacious, reliable disks await the owner of a used laptop (assuming the laptop is not eons old and that the BIOS can cope with the drive capacity....).

      --
      Previously: "Linux... Toward the Sunrise..." Now: "Linux... Toward the-- No, now, part of Every Sunrise"
    39. Re:How to make sure your data is not readable by Myopic · · Score: 1

      Hey there, Techno Vampire, I like your sig, but if you want to be a language enforcer, you might try dropping the sentence fragments -- they dilute the efficacy of your point... alot.

    40. Re:How to make sure your data is not readable by couchslug · · Score: 1

      Or for those lacking a furnace, the much more common stick welder, cranked up to 220 amps, will easily blast through the cover and melt the platters. Uses less energy too, since dragging a stick welder about the platter cavity is quicker than melting the whole drive.

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
    41. Re:How to make sure your data is not readable by techno-vampire · · Score: 1

      Not a grammar enforcer, just expressing a pet peeve. As far as sentence fragments go, there are times they're acceptable, and the need for brevity was a major concern. You'll even find fragments in highly respected classics if you want to be fussy about it.

      --
      Good, inexpensive web hosting
    42. Re:How to make sure your data is not readable by xIcemanx · · Score: 1

      The Israeli Army uses the only fool proof method I know for erasing data off magentic hardrives and is made up of 2 steps:
      A. run the Harddrive through a Powerfull Degauser (a rapidly changing electro-Magnet)
      B. Shred the Hard drive into pieces less then one square milimeter in size.

      However this system may be hard to come by for most of us, and tends to harm the hard drive.


      Yeah, in the sense that picking your nose with a bulldozer tends to harm the nostril cartilage.

    43. Re:How to make sure your data is not readable by jmv · · Score: 1

      B. Shred the Hard drive into pieces less then one square milimeter in size.

      If you're that paranoid, I would instead recommend melting, or at least bringing the drive above the Curie temperature.

      Also, you forgot the most important reason why writing random data doesn't work (if you go through the whole drive, the disk cache is not an issue). That's because the drive can re-allocate sectors when bad sectors are found, so an old copy of the data can still exist in a sector that is defective.

    44. Re:How to make sure your data is not readable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      See, I almost never actually throw away the harddrives from computers I have sold. For the most part, if the drive is in good condition, I keep it and use it as an extra storage device. If the drive happens to have developed the dreaded clicks of death, I use it as a test subject (since it is going to die anyway, I don't have to worry about losing important information). Once the drive finally kicks the bucket, I "disassemble" it using an efficent HyperAtomicMassiveMashingEffeciveReducter(HAMMER). The end result is a hard-drive jigsaw puzzle. I keeps them in plastic baggies^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H body bags. I later lay them to rest in the trash^H^H^H^H^H burial chamber.

    45. Re:How to make sure your data is not readable by nzhavok · · Score: 1

      If you had properly read the OP's comment, and the man pages of shred, you would have seen that the command they used was "shred -vz -n 30 /dev/hda" this operates on a device not the filesystem so the limitation discussed WRT journaling filesystems is not applicable. Additionally the caching is also probably not going to be a problem since you are overwriting the entire drive, not a single file - unless you have a drive that has a cache the same size as the platters I guess this wouldn't be much of a problem (hint the caches are normally 2 to 8 MB).

      To top it off, the comment you point to basically does *less* than the OP's shred command, their command only writes to the disk once, whereas the OP's does it 30 times finishing with a zero wipe.

      IMHO it's always better for a company to destroy the disks rather than return them, but if you are selling an old hard drive on ebay the shred method is probably fine (so is the dd method you linked to).

      --

      He who defends everything, defends nothing. -- Fredrick The Great
    46. Re:How to make sure your data is not readable by zx-15 · · Score: 1

      Well, not necessarily once, I can always put that expression in a loop:

      z=30;while [ $z -ge 0 ]; do dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/hda; z=`expr $z - 1`; done

    47. Re:How to make sure your data is not readable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Well, not necessarily once, I can always put that expression in a loop:


      Yes but that doesn't change the fact and that the comment you linked to didn't put it in a loop.

      z=30;while [ $z -ge 0 ]; do dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/hda; z=`expr $z - 1`; done


      This is really silly though because even if you were to execute your command it wouldn't really accomplish anything more than one iteration. The point of overwriting more than once is to flip the bits on the disk backwards and forwards, in your loop they are staying at zero meaning after the first write nothing would physically happen in the next 29 writes.

      Now I'm sure you could reply by suggesting to replace /dev/zero with /dev/random and this is a superior solution, however doing this is still inferior to the solution provided by the OP in terms of security and performance.
  23. Wow by Bryant68 · · Score: 0

    What a dumb ass.

  24. Two possibilites.. by chrispycreeme · · Score: 1

    One: This Amir is a slimy crook and is getting everything he deserves. Two: The buyer is an unreasonable dick and should be brought up on some sort of charges. Too bad laws don't take this into account. At least not in the US, not sure about the UK. Seems like in the US it wouldn't matter if Amir was a slimeball or not he could still sue the guy who bought the laptop and make his life miseralble if not deprive him of lots of money.. There should be a slimy crook/unreasonable dick law... Im going to write my congressman right now.

    1. Re:Two possibilites.. by AxemRed · · Score: 4, Informative

      Based on Amir's Ebay record, I'm going to guess that he's a slimy crook.

    2. Re:Two possibilites.. by pimpimpim · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Both the possibilities you mention are valid in this case.

      1:) All the people here talking about deleting contents of your harddrive get the point wrong. This guy sold his laptop because it broke and he was too stupid to consider mounting the HD in an other PC and moving the contents before selling it. The HD was still fully functioning, and it took the buyer no effort to get the contents of it, which he was eager to do as he was screwed by buying a broken laptop which status was mentioned as "refurbished".

      2:) The buyer is an unreasonable dick, because he could have known that this was not a serious seller. The buyer posts screenshots of the e-bay auction, that make this clear here and here. Just read the text the seller wrote, and you know that this is a no-go. Still, the buyer goes on ranting that the seller described himself as a businessman, yeah, idiot, did he really believe that?

      Nasty people will try to screw you when selling material over the internet (and not only there), and stupid people will get screwed at obvious scams. Any interference by law representatives or even the media is just a waste of time in this case.

      --
      molmod.com - computing tips from a molecular modeling
    3. Re:Two possibilites.. by Grim+Leaper · · Score: 1

      Pardon my gullibility, but what is it about the seller's text that would tip you off? If it's the misspellings and poor grammar (as others have mentioned), I'm sure there are many businessmen and managers with less than perfect English.

    4. Re:Two possibilites.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      "I'm sure there are many businessmen and managers with less than perfect English."

      Especially when they're wogs like this bastard.

    5. Re:Two possibilites.. by spyrochaete · · Score: 1

      In America you can sue McDonalds because they serve you coffee that's hot.

      In Soviet Russia, McDonalds sues you!

  25. DD not enough anymore? by BigBuckHunter · · Score: 1

    All the comments above mentions stuf like using pgp/drivecrypt or other utils to write random data to a disk before selling a piece of hardware. Whatever happened to dd if=/dev/urandom of=/dev/hda? Doesn't that do pretty much the same thing, or is "encrypted random" data better than "plain old random data" for some reason?
     
    BBH

    1. Re:DD not enough anymore? by Greyfox · · Score: 1
      That should stop your average joe from doing an undelete on your stuff, but someone with the right equipment can still read several layers of wipes. And that's before you get into the discussion about IDE drives caching pattern wipes and only writing the last pattern to a sector.

      For your average mobster, writing patterns 000000 through FFFFFF 30 or 40 times should be enough to give them a secure feeling. For the ultra-paranoid DOD nothing but completely destroying any drive that ever may have held classified information will do.

      --

      I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

  26. Splash damage by phorm · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Except for the fact that some of the pictures are of people other than the owner. While the owner might be in for some karma, how about other people who are having their pictures posted on the 'revenge' site?

    1. Re:Splash damage by arivanov · · Score: 2, Informative

      And this is exactly the reason why the guy who posted all this crap is being investigated by the police. Check the register for details: http://www.theregister.co.uk/2006/05/31/ebay_lapto p_site/

      --
      Baker's Law: Misery no longer loves company. Nowadays it insists on it
      http://www.sigsegv.cx/
    2. Re:Splash damage by smvp6459 · · Score: 1

      Seems fair to me if you have such a douche for a friend.

    3. Re:Splash damage by igb · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Although it would be an interesting question to ask the police what crime they think they're investigating. You take photographs. You pass those photographs to me in a commercial transaction. I publish them. The only thing I can think of is a copyright dispute, and surely to God the Met have better things to do in 2006 than investigate trivial non-commercial copyright infringement? The third parties might like to bring a case for privacy infringement, but in that scenario the person who put their pictures onto a hard disk and then sold it on EBay might find his position someone exposed (even if they could get a court to accept the basic action, which I doubt).

      ian

    4. Re:Splash damage by yoharryo · · Score: 1

      Seems fair to me if you have a picture of yourself licking someone's face

    5. Re:Splash damage by linvir · · Score: 2, Insightful
      surely to God the Met have better things to do in 2006 than investigate trivial [whatever this happens to be]
      They pounce on pretty much every high profile incident of any kind. The police are attention whores. Until they press charges, the only guy who needs to worry about them is the dickhead who posted the stuff, who by the way has a lot of potential charges facing him, one of which nobody has mentioned so far: blackmail

      He should have gone through the proper channels, but then hindsight is 20/20, especially when it's not about you.

    6. Re:Splash damage by logpoacher · · Score: 1

      Not sure blackmail applies here. It would be blackmail if the guy had *threatened* exposure, but there was no threat here - the guy just published anyway.

    7. Re:Splash damage by linvir · · Score: 1

      Verily, I should shut the fuck up about law issues.

  27. i question the validity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the blog contains the phrase "full access to MSN and hotmail (it just signed in automatically, whoops!)."
    to me this implies that the buyer was able to boot from the hard drive. I guess he could have just copied the cookies & favorites over but that one phrase seems kind of fishy to me.

    1. Re:i question the validity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      maybe he booted with another computer. good catch, though.

  28. More trouble for the buyer by techno-vampire · · Score: 0

    Not only did he buy a broken laptop, he's made himself vulnerable to a libel suit. Being in Britain, even if everything he says is true, that's not a defense. He held the seller up to public ridicule, and that's all that matters there. He may well end up paying thousands of pounds in damages, and if so, it serves him right. Not only is what he did wrong and irresponsible, he didn't even try to get his money back, he just published the photos to humiliate the man he bought it from. With any luck, his stupidity will be its own punishment.

    --
    Good, inexpensive web hosting
    1. Re:More trouble for the buyer by ShellFish · · Score: 1

      He did try to ask for his money back, repeatedly. Did you even read the story? Good lord.

      I used to think Britain was the land of the free. But if your libel laws are what you claim they are, then I think I'm moving to the US of A. Truth should be an absolute defense against any libel or defamation claim. I'm amazed at how little respect for the truth you display if you think it "serves him right" even if the buyer told the truth.

    2. Re:More trouble for the buyer by s7uar7 · · Score: 4, Informative

      ...he's made himself vulnerable to a libel suit. Being in Britain, even if everything he says is true, that's not a defense. He held the seller up to public ridicule, and that's all that matters there.

      No, truth is an absolute defence in defamation or libel cases in the UK. However, the defendant has to prove it's the truth, it's not up to the claimant to prove it's not.

    3. Re:More trouble for the buyer by techno-vampire · · Score: 1

      I'm no more British than you are. However, I do have to correct my statement. Truth is a defense, but not (as here in the USofA) an absolute defense. Don't know what difference it makes, but the distinction is made.

      --
      Good, inexpensive web hosting
    4. Re:More trouble for the buyer by techno-vampire · · Score: 1

      Checking on Wikipedia, I noted that truth is a defense in Britian, and an absolute defense in the USA. I presume there's a reason for the different phrasing, but I have no idea what it is. However, I do know that in Britian, libel suits are often used by the wealthy to keep unpleasant facts out of the press.

      --
      Good, inexpensive web hosting
    5. Re:More trouble for the buyer by TadZimas · · Score: 0

      Wow. I don't want to live in whatever crazy place you live.
      Example:
      The Police: "What happened here!"
      Victim: "He just shot me!"
      The Police: "Hey! That's Libel! You're under arrest! (To murderer) We're sorry, sir and/or m'am, but this person has just made libelous comments against you. He will be taken away. You are free to go."

    6. Re:More trouble for the buyer by Lord+Kano · · Score: 1

      In the 1950's Liberace sued a british newspaper for outing him. The information was true. He was gay, but he won his suit.

      LK

      --
      "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
    7. Re:More trouble for the buyer by smasm · · Score: 1

      However, I do know that in Britian, libel suits are often used by the wealthy to keep unpleasant facts out of the press.

      It's successful in keeping unpleasant facts out of the press not because truth isn't a defence. It's successful because it's hard for the defendant to prove that the allegations are true.

      I'm not a lawyer, but the three defences to libel in the UK are: 1. Prove that the statements are true.
      or
      2. Show that they were made under privilege (eg report court proceedings, or show responsible reporting - responsibility is defined).
      or
      3. Show that it is a fair comment.

      It seems that the buyer's only defence would be to show that the statements were true. It would probably be difficult to show that the laptop left the seller in the broken state. If I was the buyer and I was sued, I wouldn't be too confident.

      But considering court costs and that the seller probably wants this to disappear, a court case is incredibly unlikely.

    8. Re:More trouble for the buyer by Bloke+down+the+pub · · Score: 1
      Being in Britain, even if everything he says is true, that's not a defense.
      You didn't recently subscribe to some distance-learning law school via eBay, did you? Was the seller amir6626 by any chance?
      --
      It's true I tell you, feller at work's next door neighbour read it in the paper.
    9. Re:More trouble for the buyer by profet · · Score: 1

      Wouldn't this be more like;

      -Famous closeted Brit sells homosexual love e-mails to tabloid.

      -Tabloid publishes them.

      -Brit sues Tabloid.

      The man was simply publishing information that was sold to him.

    10. Re:More trouble for the buyer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Person A writes the USA version.
      Person B writes the UK version.

    11. Re:More trouble for the buyer by techno-vampire · · Score: 1

      First, I'm not British and second, that wouldn't be libal, it'd be slander. Having checked a bit, truth is a defense in Britian, but not an absolute defense as it is in the US. Don't know what the difference is, though.

      --
      Good, inexpensive web hosting
  29. Link to the laptop article itself by stevenm86 · · Score: 0, Redundant

    http://www.amirtofangsazan.blogspot.com/ This is where the actual good stuff comes in. It's written (purposefully) from the person of the seller, if anyone is confused.

  30. This gives me an idea.. by crossmr · · Score: 1

    I got ripped off last year for $200 on ebay. I sent the money order registered, they claimed never have to received it. Yet the money order came back with their signature on it, cashed at an exclusive credit union. The police were supposedly looking into it. There was a backlog, but there were similar complaints found from at least 2 other individuals (they posted negative feedback right before Ebay suspended their account, so I contacted them and these people did the same thing to them).
    But all totalled it was only like $350 (at least from our 3 cases). I recommended they try and get a transaction list from around that time to try and contact buyers to see if anyone else got ripped off. I haven't heard back from the cop since November, maybe I'll e-mail him again and see if he got around to it.

    Unfortunately not one of us were from the same state. Me from Canada, they were from the southern states (this person was in Ohio).

    I don't have any embarrassing photos of them, but since I have their address I suppose I could hop a bus and go take some, maybe pick up my money while I'm there.

    I did get a refund from Ebay, but it didn't include shipping, minues their "fee" for processing.

    So I was still out quite a chunk on the other side.

    1. Re:This gives me an idea.. by thegrassyknowl · · Score: 1

      I thought I got ripped off on Ebay once. It was only for a small amount ($35). The seller said he'd posted my item registered mail, but had lost the receipt number. Two months passed and I had kept hassling him because it hadn't arrived. Eventually a cheque for the total cost including shipping arrived in my mailbox. That restored my faith in people a little. Obviously the item was lost in the mail, but the guy felt bad because he didn't register it like I'd asked so he refunded my money.

      I did get screwed by a computer retailer one time (someone who is quite well known where I live). He billed my card for $2500 and then never had the goods delivered. He claimed he never received payment and then that he was having some family troubles and any number of excuses.

      The CC company wouldn't do anything about it because he claimed I'd authorised him to bill my card (true, I did click "purchase now" on his website) so the police got involved... well that was two years ago and it's still waiting for a court date. The police just have too many other things to do :(

      --
      I drink to make other people interesting!
    2. Re:This gives me an idea.. by MImeKillEr · · Score: 1

      I kinda got ripped off on eBay. At least it had a happy ending.

      I bought (not bid) on a sub box for a 2001 Silverado. The seller (who amazingly isn't on eBay under the same name anymore) said he'd shipped it. When prompted for a tracking number (several times) he admitted that he'd shipped my box to someone else.

      He was expecting some more to come in from his supplier. To me, this smacked of selling products he didn't have in stock.

      After hounding him, I managed to get a full rebate (plus shipping cost) and the box for free. I imagine he did so in order to avoid negative feedback.

      I know this situation is probably rare, but at least there are some quasi-honest sellers on eBay.

      (shameless plug)
      Incidentially, I now have this sub box for sale. Anyone in the Austin, Tx area that wants it can checkout my craiglist ad @ http://austin.craigslist.org/pts/165348274.html

      The box fits in the extended cab under the rear bench seat on the driver's side. Takes a 12" sub. This fits the 99-05 Silverado and Sierra.
      (/shameless plug)

      --
      Cruising the internet on my TI-99/4A @ a whopping 300 baud!
    3. Re:This gives me an idea.. by crossmr · · Score: 1

      This person was really bad. Initially they claimed not to have received the letter.
      I called their local post office (small post office) and spoke with the delivery man, yup they got it, he remembered scanning it at the door because it was an out of country envelope.

      So now the guy claims that sometimes he loses mail, he says he'll start digging around the porch/etc. Can't find it, big mystery.

      30 days later when I can send to the post office to get the receipt back, I do so, and it comes back. Cashed the day it arrived, with the signature on it, and cahsed at a very exclusive credit union. You have to belong to a specific worker's union to have an account there I found out.

      Thats when they stop responding to e-mails. I call them and there is suddenly no answer ever on the phone. I'm told by the other people I end up talking to who got ripped off by them, that when they did get someone to pick up there, these people put their child on the phone and told them to lie about wrong numbers/no one there/etc.

      So I contact the police in that town (Niles, Ohio) and they tell me because the check was cashed in Howland its their problem. I called the police station there and talk to a guy who takes all the info. I send him scans of the signed money order, auction pages, receipts, tracking number on the letter, etc. To me, there has gotta be cameras at the credit union. This should have been a 15 minute job. Goto the bank, have them check the tapes, go make a housecall, arrest them, end of story.

      A couple days later I notice on their feedback 2 new negative scores calling htem thieves (these people had been on ebay for over 2 years, never a negative feedback, but a few neutrals for "slow shipping") since I'd validated a CC with ebay I was able to send them messages. Exchanged info gave them the e-mail of the cop I was talking to, found out one of them had been tlaking to a detective in Niles, I think the same one who told me to call Howland, he should have taken my info to find out it was the same people and maybe realized something bigger was going on.

      This all happened (the bulk of it, last October). I wrote the Howland officer last night, maybe he'll finally have an update for me.

    4. Re:This gives me an idea.. by crossmr · · Score: 1

      I had this happen last summer sort of. I received someone else's merchandise. The seller apologized, sent me the postage (plus a little) via paypal and had me post the item to the buyer. My item had actually been posted to me as well and it arrived a day later.

  31. Seller's eBay Feedback Score by stevenm86 · · Score: 1

    Interesting point of note- The seller's ebay site lists 4 feedback items, three of these being negative. Even assuming that the three negative feedbacks were posted after the sale in question, who buys a laptop from someone with a feedback count of 1? The buyer should have definitely done some basic research on the seller when buying something expensive, like a laptop. Especially with all the ebay fraud around lately (P-p-p-powerbook anyone?) Come on, it is one click to check feedback.

  32. Link to the site by badran · · Score: 0, Redundant

    here is a direct link to the site... http://www.amirtofangsazan.blogspot.com/

  33. Has this guy got much legal defence? by Freaky+Spook · · Score: 3, Interesting

    This guy sold the computer and recieved payment? Wouldn't that mean the hard drive & its contents are now owned by the guy who bought it, and its up to him what he wants to do to it?

    Its like someone selling a house then going back 6 months later trying to reclaim property they left behind.

    1. Re:Has this guy got much legal defence? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm sure some lawyer can construct a nutty copyright infringement case for the photos..

      x photos times y downloads = profit!!1

    2. Re:Has this guy got much legal defence? by houghi · · Score: 1

      Welcome to the world of **AA

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    3. Re:Has this guy got much legal defence? by WWWWolf · · Score: 2, Informative
      Wouldn't that mean the hard drive & its contents are now owned by the guy who bought it, and its up to him what he wants to do to it?

      He sold him a physical copy of the data, and didn't actually make a contract that would specifically transfer any rights to it, or allow it to be reused.

      The seller's copyright on the data definitely remains, at least.

      If you bought a desktop machine from a famous musician and noted "oh wow, the guy's Protools directory is still here, let's make a remix - oh, what the hell, let's just sell the song as it was famously performed and let the world know I'm the new owner of this song", guess what would happen?

    4. Re:Has this guy got much legal defence? by mgblst · · Score: 1

      Sure, it really depends what you do with this information - and this is what the police are looking at. To see if anything fraudulent has happenend.

      It is like if you buy a house, and find some old bank information, then go take everything out of the account - this is illegal, despite your belief that you have found a treasure chest.

    5. Re:Has this guy got much legal defence? by harlows_monkeys · · Score: 1
      This guy sold the computer and recieved payment? Wouldn't that mean the hard drive & its contents are now owned by the guy who bought it, and its up to him what he wants to do to it?

      No, it wouldn't. The buyer would not own the copyright on any writings or photographs or movies or music or software found on the drive. He'd just own those particular copies, and so would be limited to doing with them what any other owner of a particular copy is allowed to do when they do not own the copyright.

      Besides the copyright problems, there may be other problems with publishing the photos. The people in the photos may have a cause of action against the guy, as I doubt he has a model release from them.

      I believe the UK has a court system, which is perfectly capable of handling a problem when a seller and buyer of an item have a disagreement. Generally, using this system is a lot better than trying to come up with some scheme of your own, like this buyer did, and he stands a good chance of getting a painful and expensive lesson on this.

    6. Re:Has this guy got much legal defence? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh come on, the courts these days are filled with so much pathetic crap, this guy trying to scam him really doesn't need to be argued over when there are more important things to be dealing with.

      The guy tried to screw him, he screwed him back. Alls fair I say. What kind of idiot sells a laptop with everything still on it? No-one. The only kind of person who would do that is someone who thinks the laptop is dead.

    7. Re:Has this guy got much legal defence? by Ponies_OMG · · Score: 1

      I believe the UK has a court system, which is perfectly capable of handling a problem when a seller and buyer of an item have a disagreement.
      Which is how effective if the seller moves to Dubai?

    8. Re:Has this guy got much legal defence? by igb · · Score: 1
      If you sell someone a hard disk containing information that you are the copyright holder of (eg photographs you took yourself, on your own account rather than as a work for hire) then you're going to need a pretty slippery lawyer to argue that you retained the copyright. I'm not saying that you definitely have transferred the copyright, but absent any agreement it's going to be tricky.

      The concept of `model releases' is pretty sketchy in UK law: if I go out into the street and photograph random bystanders, those photographs and their copyright belong to me absolutely. See this JISC document. You don't have a right to your image in public.

      ian

    9. Re:Has this guy got much legal defence? by glesga_kiss · · Score: 1
      Its like someone selling a house then going back 6 months later trying to reclaim property they left behind.

      Bad analogy. If they had left credit cards by mistake, would it be OK for you to use them? Also, under UK law personal data is protected and by posting it online he is breaking that law.

    10. Re:Has this guy got much legal defence? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As long as its a good enough remix that you can make enough money to afford lawyers your fine.

    11. Re:Has this guy got much legal defence? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Okay. Let's put it this way. If a company sold an old laptop with lots of of personal information, maybe yours, would the buyer then have legal right to the content? You wouldn't see any wrong in selling the content to someone who wants it, like spammers and such? The fact that the machine may have been broken doesn't have anything to do with this.

    12. Re:Has this guy got much legal defence? by harlows_monkeys · · Score: 1
      The concept of `model releases' is pretty sketchy in UK law: if I go out into the street and photograph random bystanders, those photographs and their copyright belong to me absolutely. See this JISC document. You don't have a right to your image in public.

      Some of those photographs don't look like they were in public.

    13. Re:Has this guy got much legal defence? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know about Britain, but here in the US, the fact that the seller neglected to wipe the HDU is an affirmative defense in that the seller implicitly represented that they were allowed to transfer licensure or ownership of the contents (licensing agreements to the contrary notwithstanding, HIPAA-Protected information, obvious legally protected details (SSN), etcetera). It wouldn't clear him from reverse-engineering the OS, but the pictures were his to do with as he pleased AFAIK AFA U.S. law goes - unless he reasonably could be expected to know otherwise. But like ISP's under the DMCA, once he gets notified, he has to pull copyright-offending material. Disclaimer- IANAL.

      As far as Britain goes - he's probably in hot water. Not as much as the crook is, though. They share joint responsibility there for any damage done to the secondary marks - the people in the pictures. Sloppy work.

    14. Re:Has this guy got much legal defence? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      The concept of `model releases' is pretty sketchy in UK law: if I go out into the street and photograph random bystanders, those photographs and their copyright belong to me absolutely.

      This is true in both the US and Canada as well. You do not have the right to an expectation of privacy in a public place. However you do have the right to enter a place of business without being photographed by the proprietor other than for security purposes; they can photograph you but they can't use the photos for anything without your express written consent.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    15. Re:Has this guy got much legal defence? by igb · · Score: 1
      About the only scenario when you have rights to your image would be a photograph taken somewhere you have a `reasonable expectation of privacy'. If you visit some dude's house and he takes pictures of you, you've pretty well given up any rights if he posts it to the world. If he visits your house you might have more of a case, but even then it would depend on some concept of how private you expected the pictures to be. Paris Hilton may care to give us her opinion on this...

      ian

  34. lol by Swizec · · Score: 1

    That is funny on a certain level, but I think nothing gives you an excuse to do that to a person at least not without threatening them first *evil grin*

  35. Note the feedback by CdBee · · Score: 4, Informative

    Link to Amir's profile Amir has done this before.. and how typical that the only positive feedback comes from someone called Nick Tofang.....

    --
    I have been a user for about 10 years. This ends Feb 2014. The site's been ruined. I'm off. Dice, FU
    1. Re:Note the feedback by fm6 · · Score: 1

      That has to be the most pathetic eBay profile I've every seen: three negatives and a rave from an obvious sock puppet. I mean, jeez, if you're going to be a dishonest eBay seller, you can at least try to fool people!

    2. Re:Note the feedback by pimpimpim · · Score: 1

      feedback is offline now? I got an error page.

      --
      molmod.com - computing tips from a molecular modeling
    3. Re:Note the feedback by Raenex · · Score: 2, Insightful

      No excusing the seller, but the buyer is an idiot for making a purchase of this size from a non-reputable user.

  36. just ship with a new drive or no drive by WinEveryGame · · Score: 1

    Having sold a lot of old laptops, I can tell you that the process of wiping an old disk (especially if it is less than 10GB) is sometimes just not worth it. I just buy a whole bunch of new or refurbished hard drives, say of 20GB at a very good price, and just ship the laptops with these.

    1. Re:just ship with a new drive or no drive by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1
      I can tell you that the process of wiping an old disk (especially if it is less than 10GB) is sometimes just not worth it.

      True, but if I sold one of my systems I would at least rm -rf / or install another OS. I know that the files can be recovered after that but not by anybody who is likely to be interested in my crap.

  37. Truth not always a defense by ArsenneLupin · · Score: 1
    Libel only exists when you tell a lie about someone and it damages their reputation.

    Make that "or". Outing a gay who is not yet comfortable with being out can be considered libel, even if true: Outing may be found to be libel by a court of law. And there were a couple of gay photos in the lot, even though most were straight.

    1. Re:Truth not always a defense by igb · · Score: 2, Informative

      When Liberace sued the Daily Mail over Cassandra's column, which implied that Liberace was gay, homosexuality was still illegal in the UK. The Daily Mail didn't run a justification defence: they argued that the words complained of did not accuse Liberace of a crime. They lost, but not for the reasons you suggest. If I could be bothered I'd fish a book I have about the case out and correct the Wikipedia article.

    2. Re:Truth not always a defense by crossmr · · Score: 1

      So that means nothing?
      1)it was 50 years ago
      2)They didn't bother to try and prove it was true

      If you'd like to have a point, why don't you find a case where someone lost and managed to prove the event was true.

  38. WOW! by Kingnog · · Score: 1

    Oh man, this is THE best story I have *EVER* read on slashdot :) Such a perfect way to get revenge! I love how the article talks about how police are investigating, and the site may get taken down, and the the last sentence gives a link to the site! Wow, the page counter is going crazy, I love it!

  39. Is this the guy - MySpace by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This really looks like the guy, and what would be more fun if it is than to see how many people post comments if it is?

    Anywho, this looks like the guy pictured http://www.myspace.com/fightit/ but I will say I can't say for sure.

  40. hot damn. by allio · · Score: 1

    Those are some fine looking legs. This kid had a great idea!

  41. Unverifiable? Let's give it a go... by mattmacf · · Score: 5, Informative
    After an intensive bit of sleuthing (ok, I found thesetwo screenshots off the original blog) we can dig up just a bit more info than the Register story provided.

    For your viewing pleasure:

    The original ebay auction (someone might wanna grab a mirror in case ebay decides to pull that down). Up for auction is a refurbished HP laptop with a 2.8 GHz P4 with two gigs of ram, a 15" screen and a DVD+/-RW. Ironically enough, the HD capacity is not listed.

    The seller, amir6626, who is no longer a registered ebay member with a feedback score of -2 (0 at the time of the auction with only one or two total feedback tops).

    The buyer, spikytom, an ebay member since '02 with a score of 79 (70 at the time of the auction) with a total of 1 negative feedback.

    The bid history. Of note here is the fact that the auction was sniped 20 seconds before ending for GBP$350 (roughly US$660), quite a deal on the laptop that was listed.

    Personally, I think it's quite a leap to claim extortion. I'll let you guys make your own judgements, but if you ask me, it seems like nothing more than a legitimate ebayer pissed after getting tooled over by a run-of-the-mill ebay scammer. And hey, who wouldn't be? Call me crazy, but I think the blog is great. Not only does spikytom get his own creative revenge, we all get a laugh out of it.
    --
    I only mod funny =D
  42. Revenge Blog Has Enabled Google Ads by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Here's the actual site:

    http://amirtofangsazan.blogspot.com/

    Note the allegedly scammed buyer has enabled Google ads on the web page he supposedly set up solely to extract revenge. Decide for yourself whether this impugns his credibility as a purported victim.

    1. Re:Revenge Blog Has Enabled Google Ads by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good point, but consider also the cost of being slashdotted (or theregistered, or anyone of a number of community sites which have already run this story).

    2. Re:Revenge Blog Has Enabled Google Ads by Psykosys · · Score: 1

      It's a Blogspot site, so he doesn't have to worry about the hosting. I'm fairly certain, too, that Google Ads are entirely optional for Blogger users, and they do get paid.

    3. Re:Revenge Blog Has Enabled Google Ads by iezhy · · Score: 1

      Well, the fact that google ads are there doesn't proove anything yet. First of all, that guy could not know that this site will attract such huge attention, and secondly - maybe he's just trying to get some money back (from what he wasted on laptop). Regaring disputes - all inquiries and questions are logged in eBay, when you send question, complaint or whatever to seller. So thats the place to check first, imho.

    4. Re:Revenge Blog Has Enabled Google Ads by iezhy · · Score: 2, Informative

      follow-up: here's the actual eBay page: http://cgi.ebay.ie/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item= 6825578528 note that the actual photos were removed

    5. Re:Revenge Blog Has Enabled Google Ads by Korvar · · Score: 4, Informative

      It's optional; it's also incredibly easy to set up. He could have simply set Google Ads up to see what happened when he clicked on that button. Certainly I did. I'm still trying to decide where to spend the 24p I've made so far :)

      --
      Korvar the Fox!! www.korvar.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk
    6. Re:Revenge Blog Has Enabled Google Ads by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Really, I thought that all the revenue goes to Google, since it it's Google's blogsystem. You don't even sound very sure so why are you posting this. Let instead somebody who at least knows something about this comment it.

  43. cuts both ways by davmoo · · Score: 1

    While I'm not defending the seller, the buyer **OBVIOUSLY** did not do his homework or use good judgement. Buying a laptop from someone you don't know for several hundred pounds/dollars and all they have for feedback (at the time of the auction) was one positive comment (the negatives did not get posted until *after* the auction in question) is not using good judgement.

    I always check a seller's feedback, and always look at his previous auctions. I've bought items on eBay ranging from $2 computer components to $10,000 cars. What I expect to see in the way of lots of gleaming feedback goes up exponentially as the price tag goes up :-)

    --
    I want a new quote. One that won't spill. One that don't cost too much. Or come in a pill.
  44. Re:Unverifiable? Let's give it a go... by balthan · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Also, amir6626's only positive feedback is from 'nicktofang'.
     
    Amir's last name is Tofangsazan.

  45. Prevert by Detritus · · Score: 1
    What sort of prevert takes pictures of women's legs with his cell phone while riding on the tube?

    That's the sort of behavior that I'd expect from a twelve-year-old, not an adult.

    --
    Mea navis aericumbens anguillis abundat
    1. Re:Prevert by necro2607 · · Score: 1

      You're new here, aren't you? ;)

  46. Re:Unverifiable? Let's give it a go... by Crasoum · · Score: 1

    I claimed it off what I read and saw, I didn't have all those fancy links, nor did I try to discover them so thank you for that. The article it self leaves much to be uncovered.

    I still would like to know more about what was "broke" with the laptop.

  47. About time! by garyr_h · · Score: 1

    I say, about time! I tried buying something on eBay twice, both sellers had 99% approval and hundreds of sells, both times, the product was broken although the description said it was 'like new'. And of course, after telling the owner, he just gave me negetive points. After emailing eBay, they said there was nothing they could do about it. What a load of crap.

    --
    http://chickencamels.poemofquotes.com/
    1. Re:About time! by linvir · · Score: 1
      both sellers had 99% approval and hundreds of sells, both times, the product was broken although the description said it was 'like new'
      Now imagine the seller had a terrible approval rating, and the description was badly written and evasive while claiming 100% functionality.

      eBay is a fucking shithole, and more and more people are falling in every day.

  48. Re:Unverifiable? Let's give it a go... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    And that nicktofang guy has a pretty poor history too. One positive feedback from amir6626 (suspicious enough - looks like he's giving himself positive feedback to look good and scam people...), then only one supposedly legitimate sale that went right, then bad feedback (item not as described, no response to email). Sounds like it's not quite the first time he does this (plus the ipod story). 3rd time perhaps?

    And it's not like authorities do anything about these small cases. I've been thru this a couple of times before too. Your credit card won't chargeback paypal, and paypal usually won't do anything either. In most cases, it's your word against theirs, and you can't really prove anything. Sucks.

  49. Now. That's. Funny. by BattyMan · · Score: 1

    This is the most hilarious thing I've seen since the Rodona Garst debacle!

    --
    Exceeding the recommended torque is not recommended.
  50. Wouldn't that be straight blackmail by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 1
    Since the seller SOLD this laptop he also sold all the information on it. So displaying that information could be legal. However blackmailing someone isn't. The offer to take the site down after the seller repays the buyer is a bit dodgy.

    Frankly I don't know how the law will take this. The police are not really about solving every petty dispute they are about keeping the peace and if they can't get it they tend to come down like a ton of bricks on both parties in a fight.

    Oh, well it is a good giggle for the rest of us.

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

  51. I would not hire the 'buyer'. Hope it backfires. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    it seems to me that Amir probably has more friends and social skills than the disgruntled buyer.

    I can forsee this thing getting more press, and then finally CNN or FoxNews (oxymoron) interviews Amir, and then Amir reveals the identity of the buyer, then the camera crew tracks down the greasy haired, pasty skinned nerd whose social skills in dispute resolution is to post a revenge site. Camera crews show up, world in shock at the horror of too much computer use and living in one's parent's basement.

    Never ever hire a basement dweller.
    Just sayin.

  52. I don't think we should be applauding this... by apflwr3 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The buyer seems to be in the right in this case and it seems the seller is getting what he deserves. But I would be hesitant to applaud the buyer too much and encourage copycats... For example, quite a few stolen laptops show up on eBay. I'd hate to see someone doubly victimized, both by getting their laptop stolen and by a pissed off buyer plastering their personal information and photos all over the internet.

  53. The site in question by Lord+Kano · · Score: 0, Redundant

    I haven't read through all of the comments as of right now but the website that is mentioned in TFA appears to be http://www.amirtofangsazan.blogspot.com/

    LK

    --
    "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
  54. Use the security erase feature of the ATA spec by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    ...which is made for this purpose.
     
    You could use MHDD to do this. Just password protect your drive using an ATA-command, then hack into it 3 times (MHDD does this automatically) to activate the security erase of the harddrive.
    Wait a little while (2-6 hours, depending on the harddrive), and you're done.

    I can also recommend this article, which details info on the very subject of erase protocols for harddrive, including DOD-protocols.

  55. Linky by anethema · · Score: 2, Informative

    For those who dont read the articles, link to the page containing pics and excerpts from the hdd is here:

    http://www.amirtofangsazan.blogspot.com/

    --


    It's easier to fight for one's principles than to live up to them.
  56. sigh by illuminatedwax · · Score: 2, Insightful

    While Amir might be deserving of some kind of punishment, the buyer who posted the pictures is a complete asshole.

    --
    Did you ever notice that *nix doesn't even cover Linux?
    1. Re:sigh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sounds like someone has a few guilty secrets about what is on THEIR hard drive!

    2. Re:sigh by t_allardyce · · Score: 1

      True but 2.4 million hits say hes a very funny asshole :P

      --
      This comment does not represent the views or opinions of the user.
    3. Re:sigh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sounds like someone has a few guilty secrets about what is on THEIR hard drive!

      Like medical records regarding "their" MPD?

  57. Melodrama != Angst by Draconix · · Score: 5, Funny
    --
    By reading this you acknowledge that you have read it.
    1. Re:Melodrama != Angst by Lehk228 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      It is my goal to now misues 'angst' at least 50 times each day

      --
      Snowden and Manning are heroes.
    2. Re:Melodrama != Angst by WilliamSChips · · Score: 1

      Every time you adapt that statement to fit your own twisted needs, God kill -9s a process. THINK OF THE
      Killed

      --
      Please, for the good of Humanity, vote Obama.
    3. Re:Melodrama != Angst by Khaed · · Score: 0

      Ohmygod, did you see the angst on that redhead? You could see the future in it.

      Excuse me, my angst is broke. Do you have the time?

      Stop angsting around, you stupid angst!

      There. I did my part.

      "Angstdot.
      News for ahhhh fuck it, life sucks!"

    4. Re:Melodrama != Angst by maxume · · Score: 1

      Do you have any recommendations about good ways to misuse angst?

      Do emo-kids sometimes kill themselves when blogging? Accidentally?

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    5. Re:Melodrama != Angst by machine+of+god · · Score: 2

      angstyangst angst angst

    6. Re:Melodrama != Angst by hamburger+lady · · Score: 1

      this whole thread is so kafka-esque.

      oops, there go a few hipsters.

      --

      ---
      Is this the MPAA? Is this the RIAA? Is this the DMCA? I thought it was the USA!
    7. Re:Melodrama != Angst by CapnGrunge · · Score: 1

      Kierkegaard called and wants his existential angst back.

      --
      I see 57005 people
    8. Re:Melodrama != Angst by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Omigod! I offended an angsty mod!

      Fuck you, emo.

    9. Re:Melodrama != Angst by Geno+Z+Heinlein · · Score: 1

      s/marklar/angst/g;

  58. well put by guilhermesa · · Score: 0

    HAH, you can communicate better than amir!

  59. Not True! by Greyfox · · Score: 4, Funny
    The best way in the world to handle scammers is by impaling. Impaling would be a cornerstone of my regime. I don't think we've had enough of it in the past 500 years or so, and I aim to bring it back. I'd be Bruce the Impaler. Don't knock it -- during Vlad's reign, you could leave a bag of gold on the street in Romania and no one would touch it. Why? They didn't want to get impaled.

    I doubt I'd go for Vlad's solution to the homeless problem though. He invited them all to a feast, locked them in and burned the building down. Me, I got nothing against homeless people. If you want to be homeless that's your business. So, "yes" impaling, "no" burning homeless people to death. Any successful regime must have compasison after all. Maybe "yes" burning spammers alive too. On the days we're not impaling them. I'm all about choices.

    My regime would also replace all organized relgion with a state sponsored one involving smurfs. Non-smurfy activities would be punishable by impaling. Non-smurfy activities like scamming or spamming.

    I figure I'm a shoo-in on the next Republican ticket...

    --

    I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

    1. Re:Not True! by Patrik_AKA_RedX · · Score: 1
      The best way in the world to handle scammers is by impaling. Impaling would be a cornerstone of my regime. I don't think we've had enough of it in the past 500 years or so, and I aim to bring it back. I'd be Bruce the Impaler. Don't knock it -- during Vlad's reign, you could leave a bag of gold on the street in Romania and no one would touch it. Why? They didn't want to get impaled.
      For some reason "impaling" brings up many mental images that are 18+ to say the least. But I suppose you don't mean that kind of impaling.
    2. Re:Not True! by dndfan · · Score: 0

      Back when Vlad was ruler of Romania the homeless were homeless because they were lazy crooks (fact; I live in Romania and know it from history class). Right, now, homelessness around the world is a more delicate issue, hence your opinion of the homeless (which I share). And one more thing: Vlad wasn't a cruel ruler compared to others in that time period and area, it's just his reputation.

      --
      echo "This is not a lame sig generated through a pipe." | cat - > .signature
    3. Re:Not True! by Skywings · · Score: 1

      I personally prefer a good lynching. Nothing like a public lynching to gather a crowd. These used to great wholesome entertainment where you can bring the whole family to. Bring back lynchings I'd say.

    4. Re:Not True! by linvir · · Score: 1
      What, you think the impaling is a private affair? How are people to fear the consequences if you don't make a public show out of them? I imagine Vlad and Bruce were both well aware of that.

      The only problem with vigilante lynching is that it encompasses bullshit like this as well.

    5. Re:Not True! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Impaling" as I'm made to understand it, involved sharpened, greased wooden stakes that were inserted from the rear and shoved through until they came out somewhere near the head.

      So let's just say that it would not be terribly pleasant.

  60. Re:Unverifiable? Let's give it a go... by mister_tim · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Also, the one piece of positive feedback showing on Amir6626's eBay profile is from nicktofang, who seems to share a name quite similar to Amir Tofangsazan. nicktofang also has mediocre feedback, is no longer a member, and started with one piece of good feedback from amir6626.

    Certainly looks fishy to me.

  61. Wisdom foolows, pay attention! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    > Yes, it would suck if the buyer had to go on trial.

    He will. The personal data protection laws in the European union (of which Britain is a member state) are extremely serious. The guy used the data without authorization and by making it public, he has become a criminal. He is very lucky if he aviods spending actual time in prison. I am sure the civil penalties will make him bankrupt anyhow.

    Just yesterday, the EU supreme court crushed the EU-USA airline passanger data exchange agreement because it does not adequately protect EU citizens' privacy rights. If Sheik Osama is not enough excuse for rights treampling, that 375UKP certainly cannot be enough as well.

    Also, the british mentality values privacy of the individual over anything else. The guy who posted someone else's details in public made himself anathema from the community of gentlemen and may have difficulty finding a job or gaining university admission by showing such moral definiencies in handling details of others' personal lifes. Also, the guy who posted the photos on the web is obviously homophobic based on his comments, which is a big no-no in liberal Europe and gayness is well established in britain since Oscar Wilde.

    Not to mention the gross violation against the other people seen in those images. That is not "collateral damage", that is pure wickedness. I hope some of those people will also sue the avenger guy and make him feel the pain of having to pay half of his wage for penalties for a hundred months to come.

    Finaly the guy who posted the photos online violated the most basic rule of civilization as we know it: presumption of innocence. Where is the proof the laptop was indeed sent in already faulty condition? What proof is there the damage did not happen while being rudely transported by the postal service, etc.?

    1. Re:Wisdom foolows, pay attention! by Wheely · · Score: 1

      Unlikely considering he sold the data to the buyer.

    2. Re:Wisdom foolows, pay attention! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

      > Unlikely considering he sold the data to the buyer.

      Except that pimpy neoliberal nerds of America do not make law in Europe (yet). Certain unalienable things cannot be sold, just like you cannot sell yourself to slavery.

      Even when the law allows you to voluntarily provide your data for handling to certain private economic entities (like marketing agencies), the data recepient must have an established corporate legal framework and EU-compliant privacy protection charta approved by the authorities. The laptop buyer certainly meets none of that.

      Europe, especially continental Europe is very paranoid about personal data handling. We have gazillion paragraphs to protect people over that. Personal info databases of separete functionality must not be connected just for ease of operation, but for a compelling need, approved by 2/3rd parlamentary vote or supreme court decision, and many other restictions like that.

      The avenger guy will be held responsibly almost as seriously as if he had found state secrets on that laptop and uploaded that confidental info on the open web.

      Look at from this viewpoint: the photos the laptop buyer uploaded allege that the seller is homosexual or at least bisexual. In the Holocaust, same-sex people were the third largest minority group persecuted by the nazi (after jews and gipsy). That was a mere 60 years ago. Hope you understand why we think such data better not be handled, collected, traded, disclosed by anyone in Europe or anywhere in the world. The data privacy situation in the USA is frightening for any european.

      BTW, if this reported event happened in Switzerland, the laptop buyer would have been murdered two dozen times already. That country values absolute privacy over justice, truth or honesty due to its entire reliance on banking, much of which is very dirty (dictators, drug barons, arms smugglers, world politicans, speculants, spies all keep their fiscals there).

    3. Re:Wisdom foolows, pay attention! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The guy who posted someone else's details in public made himself anathema from the community of gentlemen

      Oh, that fine old British community of gentlemen. Give up; I'm British and I have no idea what community you're talking about.

      The guy who posted the site is already doing a university degree (in cognitive science, apparently) whilst the seller is apparently doing two A-Levels in the hope of becoming a barrister, which suggests to me that they have lowered the threshold of that qualification, two A-levels being hardly enough to get you into Kingston Poly^WUni.

      Not sure I see much sign of specific homophobia, unless the site is also to be seen as foot-sucking-fetish-phobic.

      As it happens, I think what the British mentality does value (if anything, and it is worth bearing in mind here that there are a lot of flavours of British) is not privacy of the individual but operating within reasonable limits. You could call it playing fair if you were of a 1920s hockey-playing sort of persuasion, but what it means is that those who kick the ass out of the system don't get much respect. You can go on about presumption of innocence all you like, but then you're not stuck with a faulty laptop and a buyer who claims to have moved to Dubai...

    4. Re:Wisdom foolows, pay attention! by ArsenneLupin · · Score: 4, Funny
      Also, the british mentality values privacy of the individual over anything else.

      ha
      ha
      ha
      *cough*
      CCTV
      *cough*

      ha ha ha ha ha

      Can I have something of what you've been smoking? Apparently it's some very good stuff!

    5. Re:Wisdom foolows, pay attention! by Macthorpe · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Where is the proof the laptop was indeed sent in already faulty condition?

      The fact that the laptop was delivered below the specs listed suggests a general dishonesty that would also lead the seller to sell a broken laptop. Also, I suspect that if he expected the laptop to be actually usable, he would as a potential barrister have the presence of mind and foresight to wipe the contents first.

      I am British, and being British I appreciate not only irony but also 'just desserts'. A man who deliberately set out to defraud someone has reaped his reward!

      --
      "It does not do to leave a live dragon out of your calculations, if you live near him." - Tolkien
    6. Re:Wisdom foolows, pay attention! by Salgak1 · · Score: 1

      Having sold the computer, did not the rights to all the data on the computer not transfer along with the computer itself ? I can't say I know EU law, but the seller could have wiped the drive, and did not.....

    7. Re:Wisdom foolows, pay attention! by Firehed · · Score: 1

      I'd wager this depends on whether the buyer did one of those 'unformatting' recovery things or whether the seller did nothing at all to remove the old data.

      --
      How are sites slashdotted when nobody reads TFAs?
    8. Re:Wisdom foolows, pay attention! by indifferent+children · · Score: 1
      Except that pimpy neoliberal nerds of America do not make law in Europe (yet). Certain unalienable things cannot be sold, just like you cannot sell yourself to slavery.

      Are you sure that you didn't mean 'Libertarian' instead of neoliberal? Some Libertarians argue that you, as a sovereign individual, should be allowed to sell yourself into slavery. American Liberals care about the outcomes that would result from their policies, and most are opposed to even renting yourself out as a prostitute. Liberals and Libertarians have very little in common, and if Libertarians are neo-anything, they are not neoliberal.

      --
      Censorship is telling a man he can't have a steak just because a baby can't chew it. --Mark Twain
    9. Re:Wisdom foolows, pay attention! by Gorshkov · · Score: 1

      Even when the law allows you to voluntarily provide your data for handling to certain private economic entities (like marketing agencies), the data recepient must have an established corporate legal framework and EU-compliant privacy protection charta approved by the authorities. The laptop buyer certainly meets none of that.

      Call me silly, but I'm guessing that that might have something to do with the fact that the laptop buyer isn't a corporation

      My birthday is Sept 13, 1958. If you tell anybody I'm gonna have your ass arrested and will personally see that you get an over-friendly roomie named Bubba for the next 5-10.

    10. Re:Wisdom foolows, pay attention! by squiggleslash · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Without wishing to comment on the GP, which makes some presumptions that aren't really true at the moment (though he's bang-on about the privacy laws), the seller may have sold a copy (the only copy) of the data to the buyer, but the buyer still doesn't have the right to redistribute the information.

      The GP is right that data protection laws are extremely strict throughout Europe, including Britain. Laws on libel and slander also do not rely upon the information being false (truth is not a strict defense against defamation charges in Britain) and, actually, the way the information has been presented, if the guy who sold the laptop isn't well-out-of-the-closet with the various alleged fetishes, he almost certainly has a strong libel case, under British law, against the buyer (actually, he probably does anyway, if the buyer can't prove the laptop wasn't broken before it was shipped.)

      Quite honestly, this is the wrong way to conduct business whatever country you're in. "Alas" for the buyer, he's chosen the most extreme way to conduct business in a country where there are severe legal penalties for pulling these kinds of stunts. Even assuming the seller wasn't willing to take back the laptop, and the product wasn't shipped with insurance, there's a small claims court he could have used. Instead he's resorted to harassment, taking the law into his own hands.

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    11. Re:Wisdom foolows, pay attention! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      He will. The personal data protection laws in the European union (of which Britain is a member state) are extremely serious. The guy used the data without authorization and by making it public, he has become a criminal. He is very lucky if he aviods spending actual time in prison. I am sure the civil penalties will make him bankrupt anyhow.

      Just yesterday, the EU supreme court crushed the EU-USA airline passanger data exchange agreement because it does not adequately protect EU citizens' privacy rights. If Sheik Osama is not enough excuse for rights treampling, that 375UKP certainly cannot be enough as well.


      You know, the really sad part is that the police who will come down on the buyer like a ton of bricks are the same police who most certainly would've ignored the seller's theft of $400 pounds in the first place. Then this'll be just another case of the classic schoolyard take-your-beating-quietly-because-we-punish-protec ting-yourself-a-million-times-harder. Is it any wonder why there is such disrespect for law enforcement?
    12. Re:Wisdom foolows, pay attention! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ID card, anyone?

    13. Re:Wisdom foolows, pay attention! by gowen · · Score: 1
      *cough*
      CCTV
      *cough*

      ha ha ha ha ha
      Not pointing into our houses. Let me explain, briefly, the difference between "public" and "private".

      We expect privacy for those things we do in private.
      For things we do in public, we have no expectation of privacy.

      CCTV cameras record things which are done in public, therefore, they do not affect privacy (which is related to things done in private).

      People looking at me as I walk down the street (a public location) = not an invasion of privacy.
      People looking at me as I sit in my front room (a private location) = an invasion of privacy.

      That's really not a very hard distinction to make.
      --
      Athletic Scholarships to universities make as much sense as academic scholarships to sports teams.
    14. re: wisdom foolows, pay attention! by ed.han · · Score: 1

      considering the selller sold the laptop, including its constituent parts (which include the hard drive and hence all data thereon), i'd say that he's the owner of that data. ed

    15. Re:Wisdom foolows, pay attention! by elvum · · Score: 1

      The personal data protection laws in the European union (of which Britain is a member state) are extremely serious. The guy used the data without authorization and by making it public, he has become a criminal. He is very lucky if he aviods spending actual time in prison. I am sure the civil penalties will make him bankrupt anyhow.

      I accept that you're an Anonymous Coward and probably trolling, but really - you should do some research into the laws you cite before making such wild assertions. The Data Protection Act in the UK applies to organisations, not individuals. And there is no civil penalty for publishing damaging information about a person, as long as it's true.

    16. Re:Wisdom foolows, pay attention! by wobblie · · Score: 1

      Why don't you look up neo-liberal in an encyclopedia instead of being yet another internet Rand/Heinlen reading nerd spouting more ignorant nonsense?

    17. Re:Wisdom foolows, pay attention! by bishiraver · · Score: 1

      "he guy used the data without authorization and by making it public" Wouldn't the fact that Amir sold him the data make that moot?

    18. Re:Wisdom foolows, pay attention! by duerra · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Also, the british mentality values privacy of the individual over anything else.

      Uhh... is this the same British mentality that allows their government to track their every destination on the roads, and store that data for years?

      Is this the same British mentality that is allowing the EU to dictate that ISP's retain all traffic info on all of their users for a minimum of 5 years?

      Is this the same British mentality that recently got an innocent man shot because they thought he might be a terrorist, because he was wearing a trench coat?

      Is this the same British mentality that is allowing their government to develop ID cards that have all your fingerprint and facial recognition data on it for analysis by all of these closed circuit cameras you guys are putting up on every street corner?

      Huh... I must have missed something.
    19. Re:Wisdom foolows, pay attention! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nice troll :)

    20. Re:Wisdom foolows, pay attention! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "(truth is not a strict defense against defamation charges in Britain)"

      Yes, it is.

      http://www.swarb.co.uk/lawb/defTrueLibel.shtml

    21. Re:Wisdom foolows, pay attention! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Deserts, as in, what you deserve, not an after-meal treat.

    22. Re:Wisdom foolows, pay attention! by m0thr4 · · Score: 2, Insightful
      > Also, the british mentality values privacy of the individual over anything else.
      The same British mentality that feeds our famously invasive tabloid press?
    23. Re:Wisdom foolows, pay attention! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      QUOTE

      Also, the british mentality values privacy of the individual over anything else. The guy who posted someone else's details in public made himself anathema from the community of gentlemen and may have difficulty finding a job or gaining university admission by showing such moral definiencies in handling details of others' personal lifes. Also, the guy who posted the photos on the web is obviously homophobic based on his comments, which is a big no-no in liberal Europe and gayness is well established in britain since Oscar Wilde.

      END QUOTE

      Thats hillarious - cctv anyone?

    24. Re:Wisdom foolows, pay attention! by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 1

      Yep! The very same "privacy loving" British that have video cameras on all public areas.

      --
      (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
    25. Re:Wisdom foolows, pay attention! by TastyCakes · · Score: 1

      I'm just trying to picture in my head the kind of mentality that makes someone write a post like this. Proclaiming "wisdom follows" and then proceeding with a diatribe that demonstrates almost total lack of understanding of british society? This isn't informative, it's a demonstration of north american ignorance and naiivety. It reminds me of an environmentalist friend of mine who once tried to convince me that the chinese "worship nature" and so they'd never face environmental problems like we do. It just boggles the mind that such misconceptions can remain unbroken in people until adulthood. And if you don't know about a subject (particularly if that subject is people) why would you feign familiarity with them? /rant

    26. Re:Wisdom foolows, pay attention! by iminplaya · · Score: 1

      Also, the british mentality values privacy of the individual over anything else.

      Really? How does that explain all those cameras all over the place?

      --
      What?
    27. Re:Wisdom foolows, pay attention! by Mortice · · Score: 1

      "People looking at me as I walk down the street (a public location) = not an invasion of privacy. People looking at me as I sit in my front room (a private location) = an invasion of privacy.

      "That's really not a very hard distinction to make."

      People filming me with not necessarily visible cameras wherever I go, albeit in public? How does that fit into your scheme?

      Think things through and realise that very few issues are black and white before you start taking a condescending tone, please.

    28. Re:Wisdom foolows, pay attention! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That draw you got from me was obviously not under.

    29. Re:Wisdom foolows, pay attention! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Europe, especially continental Europe is very paranoid about personal data handling. We have gazillion paragraphs to protect people over that. Personal info databases of separete functionality must not be connected just for ease of operation, but for a compelling need, approved by 2/3rd parlamentary vote or supreme court decision, and many other restictions like that.

      IANAEL, however, from the little I've read about European privacy laws, the bulk of the restrictions appear to be placed on Commercial and private entities, whereas government bodies are pretty much free to collect whatever, whenever they please. Vacuuming email in Britian? It was in a recvent /. article that folks complained about negotiations between the US State Dept and the EU about establishing a mechanism to allow the US intel agencies to request access to specific data collected by EU officials on EU citizens. The EU data collection far exceeded anything permitted by US law, in the US.

    30. Re:Wisdom foolows, pay attention! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As I understand the circumstances, there was a sale - a computer in exchange for cash. Since the terms of the sale did not specifically exclude contents of the hard drive, I believe the buyer owns the computer AND its contents. Therefore the data on the hard drive became the property of the buyer and in that case the buyer should not be exposed to criminal or civil penalties. Although from a practical point of view, I suppose the buyer may be coerced into taking the offending site down.

    31. Re:Wisdom foolows, pay attention! by pthisis · · Score: 2, Informative

      the photos the laptop buyer uploaded allege that the seller is homosexual or at least bisexual. In the Holocaust, same-sex people were the third largest minority group persecuted by the nazi (after jews and gipsy)

      Not to denigrate any group, simply to ensure that others are not forgotten:

      Jews were the largest group persecuted, followed in order by Catholics, Poles, Serbs, the disabled, Roma/Sinti ("gypsy), Freemasons, Communists, homosexuals, and Jehovah's Witnesses. That's assuming you don't include millions of Slavic and Soviet citizens and POWs killed as persecutions per se.

      --
      rage, rage against the dying of the light
    32. Re:Wisdom foolows, pay attention! by Bush+Pig · · Score: 1

      > ... gayness is well established in britain since Oscar Wilde.

      Yeah, right. Obviously you've forgotten what happened to Alan Turing.

      I don't think the buyer is homophobic, I just think he's justifiably angry at being ripped off.

      --
      What a long, strange trip it's been.
    33. Re:Wisdom foolows, pay attention! by gowen · · Score: 1
      People filming me with not necessarily visible cameras wherever I go, albeit in public
      Your in public. You shouldn't have any expectation of privacy. People could equally well be watching you from behind their net curtains.

      Why is it a big deal that people can see you when you're out in public?
      --
      Athletic Scholarships to universities make as much sense as academic scholarships to sports teams.
    34. Re:Wisdom foolows, pay attention! by BoothbyTCD · · Score: 1

      ...gayness is well established in britain since Oscar Wilde. Tell that to Turing.

      --
      snig
    35. Re:Wisdom foolows, pay attention! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So you are saying that if I put my contact information on currency notes, that because of privacy laws that I will have the right to then demand the notes back while visiting in Europe?

      Hmmm, sounds like a European vacation on $100US.

  62. Buyer's name is Thomas Sawyer, 23, from Exeter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    From this article: http://www.thisismoney.co.uk/news/article.html?in_ article_id=409510&in_page_id=2

    "Thomas Sawyer, 23, was incensed at wasting £375 on the computer and, after repairing it, plotted his revenge.

    He designed a site showing embarrassing images of the vendor, Amir Tofangsazan, pornographic images and '90 pictures of women's legs' which he said he had found on the machine.

    In a mocking first person account, Mr Sawyer told the story of the sale in detail. His victim, an 18-year-old A-level student from Barnet, North London, said his life had been made 'a living hell' and threatened to sue for libel.

    Mr Sawyer, a student from Exeter, said he would take the site down in return for a refund and an apology. "

    1. Re:Buyer's name is Thomas Sawyer, 23, from Exeter by ylikone · · Score: 1

      If the guy is really having a terrible time, just apologize already and refund the piddly amount of cash! What a loser!

      --
      Meh.
  63. Oh, yeah by BattyMan · · Score: 1

    Right, under USAPATRIOT, all accountability has been removed from the Government.
    Silly of me...

    --
    Exceeding the recommended torque is not recommended.
  64. Mod parent up by myxiplx · · Score: 1

    My thoughts exactly :)

    If you're gonna be a muppet & rip somebody off, don't sell them all your personal data... lol

  65. baiting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Since we're on the subject of it, how does it work, anyway? zdrrdx

  66. just wondering? by atarione · · Score: 3, Interesting

    for everyone that says it is "wrong" ..illegal ..etc for the buyer to have posted the pics?

    the Seller sold the buyer the equipment... the harddrive thusly becoming the property of the "buyer"....Didn't the contents of the harddrive also became the property of the buyer????

    Assuming that is correct... would it really be "wrong" for the buyer to utilize the contents of the drive to his choosing????

    i certainly hope no action is taken agaist the "buyer" (assuming of course the lappy was as described broken and otherwise not as advertised).

    --
    actually I am happy to see you, however that is in fact a banana in my pocket.
    1. Re:just wondering? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      when a 19 year old person has a laptop, it's either a handmedown item from a friend, or he got it second hand.

      so, the pictures on the laptop aren't necessarily of the seller, or taken by the seller.

      By your argument, I would have full rights to redistribute Windows 98 which came on the used laptop I bought at an auction.

    2. Re:just wondering? by HappyEngineer · · Score: 2, Insightful

      We don't even know that the pictures really came from the laptop. It seems reasonably likely that the laptop was broken if the feedback on ebay is any guide. But, the buyer is obviously pretty dim. He bought a laptop from someone with 1 feedback. It seems reasonable to me that someone that stupid (being more an animal than a human) would be capable of lying about finding those pics on the laptop.

      Or maybe it's all true. There's no way to tell from this tabloid crap.

    3. Re:just wondering? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > By your argument, I would have full rights to redistribute Windows 98 which came on the used laptop I bought at an auction.

      You do, unless it is specified in the EULA from Microsoft that you can't. (Take a wild guess.)

    4. Re:just wondering? by mlk · · Score: 1
      Didn't the contents of the harddrive also became the property of the buyer????

      The porn most likely did not "belong" to the seller but to the porn-peddlers, nor would the seller have any legal right to distrubute it. I wounder if the porn-peddlers could go after the buyer for illegally distributing IP?
      --
      Wow, I should not post when knackered.
    5. Re:just wondering? by Bogtha · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Didn't the contents of the harddrive also became the property of the buyer????

      Yes they did. However property is not copyright. The person who took the photos still retains the copyright and could probably sue him for copyright infringement.

      Think about it - the laptop probably came with Windows on the hard drive too - would it be legal for the buyer to put Windows on a website for people to download too?

      --
      Bogtha Bogtha Bogtha
    6. Re:just wondering? by Keebler71 · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Assuming that is correct... would it really be "wrong" for the buyer to utilize the contents of the drive to his choosing????

      I think you are confusing legality with morality. Legal ... of course. Moral ... Maybe/maybe-not

      --
      "It takes considerable knowledge just to realize the extent of your own ignorance." - Thomas Sowell
    7. Re:just wondering? by phiwum · · Score: 1

      the Seller sold the buyer the equipment... the harddrive thusly becoming the property of the "buyer"....Didn't the contents of the harddrive also became the property of the buyer????

        Assuming that is correct... would it really be "wrong" for the buyer to utilize the contents of the drive to his choosing????



      No. The buyer has put up a website with someone else's photos on it. This is an apparent (if minor) copyright infringement if nothing else. He's redistributing copyrighted work. (The seller is presumably the copyright holder for some but not all of these photos.)

      At least in the U.S., this would be a pretty minor complaint, since the damages due to copyright infringement are negligible. But literally speaking, it is nonetheless an infringement.

      Anyway, there are other possible infringements as well. I don't know diddly about UK privacy laws, for instance, but it's not implausible he's violating those. Libel is also a possibility.

      --
      Phiwum's law: anyone that names an obvious law after himself and then puts it in his own sig is just pathetic.
    8. Re:just wondering? by hotdiggitydawg · · Score: 1

      The buyer has put up a website with someone else's photos on it. This is an apparent (if minor) copyright infringement if nothing else. He's redistributing copyrighted work. (The seller is presumably the copyright holder for some but not all of these photos.)

      Ahh - but the seller sold the photos to the buyer along with the laptop - and furthermore did not place any restrictions on their use at the point of sale. If they were sold unwittingly, that's not the buyer's problem. The contents of the harddrive were sold as-is with no restrictions in place at the time of sale. You can't shut the gate after the horse has bolted.

      Caveat vendor - seller beware!

    9. Re:just wondering? by phiwum · · Score: 2, Insightful

      No. Copyright doesn't work like that.

      Suppose I write a book and sell a copy to you. Even if I express no copyright or licensing restrictions, you do not have the right to distribute that text. (You have first sale rights to loan, sell or give the book, but not to distribute copies of the entire text.) The same applies to photos. If you acquire photos for which I hold the copyright, you have no legal right to distribute those photos absent some explicit agreement with me.

      The copyright holder retains distribution rights unless there is an explicit agreement otherwise. (The fact that software comes with the inevitable shrinkwrap terms and DVDs come with reminders that all rights have been reserved probably explains why folks think copyrights have to be expressly claimed. But it isn't so in any Berne convention signatory, like the US and UK.)

      --
      Phiwum's law: anyone that names an obvious law after himself and then puts it in his own sig is just pathetic.
    10. Re:just wondering? by Aqua_boy17 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but if the HD was so damaged that Amir couldn't properly wipe it, how did the buyer get it working well enough to extract the embarassing photos? Enquiring minds want to know.

      --
      What if the Hokey Pokey really is what it's all about?
    11. Re:just wondering? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ok, i actually know of the buyer and I can tell you honestly he is a reasonable and well educated guy. Fair to say he bought from a dodgy auction, but we can all make mistakes with offers that seem too good to be true. Sometimes we are blinded by them (or the ganja smoke). Just have a think for a minute and contemplate why someone would bother to create this blog and put all this stuff up for no reason? The buyer's ebay profile compared with Amir's is "almost" evidence enough to say who the bad guy is. I think this is something to be taken lightly, yes Amir's rep is hurt, but I guess he had it coming - It probably wasn't the most "legal" route to take, but then again neither is selling broken goods on ebay when the description states differently. Both buyer and seller showed signs of stupidity, but isn't this part of being human..?? I just wanted to clear up the argument that the buyer could have been making it all up, im sorry u guys who think it is all fictional, it's not. im bored of my own post now Hope everyone is enjoying...

    12. Re:just wondering? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      No.

      Copyright of the pictures transferred to the buyer.

      Even if you don't agree with that, Windows is very, very different. The seller never had control over the copyright; MS does. The seller only had a license to use Windows which may or may not be transferred based on the license/EULA.

      These don't compare and me answering NO to
      [W]ould it be legal for the buyer to put Windows on a website for people to download too?
      does NOT mean that it would also be illegal to put those pictures on a website for people to download
    13. Re:just wondering? by Myopic · · Score: 1

      would it really be "wrong" for the buyer to utilize the contents of the drive to his choosing?

      Whether it is wrong, I won't conjecture, but it could certainly be illegal (operative word is 'could'). Citizens don't retain absolute right to do as they please with all the information they come across, even if they acquire it legitimately. For instance, a mis-addressed letter which arrives in your mailbox with sensitive information does not give you the prerogative to reveal that info -- at least, not absolutely.

      On the other hand, the limits set out in the law might not apply to this case, I don't know.

  67. 'nother ebay story by thephydes · · Score: 2, Informative

    My daughter "bought" an ipod on Ebay, and it never arrived. A couple of weeks later she was contacted by another "buyer" who had noticed that the "seller" had a business email address. So, he looked up the business on the internet and contacted the owner. Lo and behold, the business was a security firm, and the"seller" had been using company time, and the company system to market the ipods that she didnt have. So, Mim contacted the owner, and he told her that she would have her money in her bank account by the end of the week, which it was. I wonder if the seller is still a trusted employee at the security firm. ....... I certainly hope not. We subsequently heard that she had ripped off at least another 4 people with the same scam.

    1. Re:'nother ebay story by MImeKillEr · · Score: 1

      My sister-in-law's ex-boyfriend ran a similar scam on eBay. He too was selling products he didn't have with no intention of making good.

      This is wire fraud. See http://www.lectlaw.com/def2/w017.htm.

      We're hoping he goes to PMITA prison (after he gets out of jail for stalking).

      What a loser.

      --
      Cruising the internet on my TI-99/4A @ a whopping 300 baud!
  68. huh? by Lehk228 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    what the fuck are you talking about?

    --
    Snowden and Manning are heroes.
  69. say hello to the 1950s for me by RMH101 · · Score: 4, Interesting
    "Also, the british mentality values privacy of the individual over anything else. The guy who posted someone else's details in public made himself anathema from the community of gentlemen and may have difficulty finding a job or gaining university admission by showing such moral definiencies in handling details of others' personal lifes.

    Are you posting that from the Victorian era?
    We now have Big Brother as one of our most popular TV shows (attention seeking nobodies stuck in a house and monitored live 24/7), the most CCTV in Europe etc...

  70. Now in the hands of the police by Zog+The+Undeniable · · Score: 4, Informative

    According to The Register, the Metropolitan Police have received a complaint about "improper use of communications networks" and are investigating. Whether the complaint was made by the eBay seller, we don't know. There's also an amusing-in-a-schadenfreude-way article in the (right wing scandal rag) Daily Mail today, where someone else claims to have been shafted by the seller on eBay.

    --
    When I am king, you will be first against the wall.
    1. Re:Now in the hands of the police by ettlz · · Score: 1
      right wing scandal rag
      Don't let the Express hear you calling the Mail that!
    2. Re:Now in the hands of the police by Zog+The+Undeniable · · Score: 1

      As everyone knows, the Daily Express is merely the paramilitary wing of the Daily Mail...with a disturbing Princess Diana obsession.

      --
      When I am king, you will be first against the wall.
    3. Re:Now in the hands of the police by ettlz · · Score: 1

      Well I guess you could probably call them the "Real Daily Mail"...

  71. yes but by RMH101 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    ...you're not the sort of muppet who, when his laptop "breaks", thinks "I know, I'll sell it to someone on Ebay and pretend it was still working".
    Not everyone is clued up enough to take the HDD out and wipe it in another PC, either and I think we've had demonstrated that the person in question isn't the brightest tool in the box...

  72. Re:Unverifiable? Let's give it a go... by mgblst · · Score: 1

    I like the blog, but I am not sure why he didn't follow the usual channels, getting money from paypal - which is not actually that hard.

    And I or any sensible person would not buy anything from someone with 1 positive feedback, especially not a £350 laptop. And this bidder, unlike my gf who I would expect to do something like this, is obviously reasonable technically literate.

  73. Re:The shortest summary I have ever seen. by westyx · · Score: 1

    Shortest *and* most accurate. 2 for 2!

  74. just to split hairs... by VonKruel · · Score: 1

    For the sake of argument, suppose the laptop was not broken and the seller was honest. Further suppose that the seller had made some weak attempt to delete the information, which he mistakenly thought was good enough to prevent it from being recovered. In that case, do you think it would be ethical for the buyer to recover the data, and to make any embarrassing information public?

    From my point of view, the moral status of the buyer's actions really hinge on whether or not the seller intentionally shipped a broken laptop. It looks like he did, and that's why the buyer's actions are justified, not because he has some kind of overriding moral right to do whatever he pleases with the information that was on the drive. Let's just all hope we're right about this - otherwise we're all a bunch of assholes for enjoying this so much :)

    One thing is sure though - people hate to get screwed, and they love to hear about crooked fuckers getting their due.

  75. DRM? by aalu.paneer · · Score: 1

    When he sold the laptop, did the rights to content of the HDD and rights to use them also transfered? Who owns the copyright on pictures the buyer has posted? Can Amir get them pulled off by saying that he has not given explict permission for them to be used?

    --
    where did my sig go? where's my sig at?
  76. LIBEL is FALSE allegations by MosesJones · · Score: 2, Informative

    If its true then its NEVER LIBEL. Calling Jeffery Archer a liar and a criminal may damage his reputation but that is okay because its true and has been proven in a court of law.

    So if this bloke did sell a broken laptop and did have all this content on there, then the only question would be invasion of privacy, which is a civil not a criminal matter.

    --
    An Eye for an Eye will make the whole world blind - Gandhi
  77. Like hell it won't! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    n/m

  78. The last laugh by Cannelloni · · Score: 1
    I have no sympathy for the seller. He is a liar and a cheat, plain and simple, and deserves all the discomfort and public humiliation the publication of his dirty pictures etc has caused him. I hope it hurt him bad, because he deserved every bit of it.

    Actually, I think the buyer was very modest and balanced about it, and chose to use humour and wit as lethal weapons and not blind rage. I think I would have been less prudent and wise. In a fit of uncontrollable anger, I would have used brute force and published EVERYTHING on that hard drive: credit card numbers, personal details, pr0n... the whole lot. But that may have been a criminal offence. As Mr. Spock would have put it, revenge is a dish best served cold.

    Then again, who in their right mind buys a well-worn laptop on Ebay, and without inspecting it first?

    --
    Beauty is in the beholder of the eye.
  79. Re:The shortest summary I have ever seen. by MORB · · Score: 1

    I think there is some kind of distortion in the very fabric of the interwebs that makes Fark posts dupes all the time like slashdot and slashdot posts fark headline sized summaries these days.

  80. Shame on Slashdot! by gandalfur · · Score: 1

    A disgruntled buyer takes his issues to the Internet publishing personal information on the seller. Shame on the buyer for resolving his problems this way. Shame on Slashdot for thinking that this is "stuff that matters". Business disputes should of course be resolved between the two parties or in the courts.

  81. Location by t_allardyce · · Score: 1

    You can look up the name of the fast food place hes in (Hollywood Fried Chicken on the menu in the background) and cross reference it with the phone number of the hire shop across the street to figure out that hes in the Hollywood Fried Chicken in Lillie Road (SW6) near West Brompton station. The floor of the tube was also a clue but lets pretend I didn't know that... Ahh google.

    --
    This comment does not represent the views or opinions of the user.
    1. Re:Location by jginspace · · Score: 1

      Makes sense. He popped into the cop shop in Fulham to report this - just before his shift started probably?

    2. Re:Location by The+Cisco+Kid · · Score: 1

      Who popped in where? The pictures are from the laptop's hard drive, all stored before the seller shipped it to the buyer, before either the buyer or the seller had anything to report to the police.

    3. Re:Location by jginspace · · Score: 1

      A complaint was made in person at a police station in Fulham a few days ago. I think this was reported in the Register and a few other (BBC? Daily Mail?) articles. Now I think we can assume it was the seller making the complaint - but he lives in Barnet - the fact that the complaint was made in Fulham seemed quite intereting but the info provided by the GP throws light on that. Possibly there's more to it as well, why he was relctant to deal with his local fuzz.

  82. wrong... by hummassa · · Score: 1

    in many jurisdicitions (mine included) there is no "computer break-in" crimes/misdemeanors. using another person's password can be a part of other crimes (like fraud, mail invasion, or embezzlement) but it's not a crime on itself.

    --
    It's better to be the foot on the boot than the face on the pavement. ~~ tkx Kadin2048
  83. Sonds like a job for Judge Judy! by TapeCutter · · Score: 1

    What law has he broken?

    Don't know about a full blown criminal trial but wasn't there some sort of "restrain the village idiots" law introduced into the UK a few years back?

    Cut to Judge Judy ruffling through buyers papers:

    Did you contact the seller for his money back or did you skip straight to revenge? ...don't interupt me...I can read them myself...All I see here are some ebay comments saying the seller can't be trusted. So what?....(shot of buyer standing in puzzled silence)...Cat got your tounge?...Answer me!

    --
    And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
    1. Re:Sonds like a job for Judge Judy! by markbthomas · · Score: 1

      Surely requests for money back would be done through private email, not public eBay comments.

    2. Re:Sonds like a job for Judge Judy! by gfxguy · · Score: 1

      Unless the private requests went unanswered which, apparently, they did.

      --
      Stupid sexy Flanders.
    3. Re:Sonds like a job for Judge Judy! by Rude-Boy · · Score: 1

      If you had actually read the page...

      "Although the buyer paid the £375 total within a few days, it took me nearly two months before i bothered to post the laptop. What the buyer didn't know was that it differed slightly from its description on ebay. Rather than having 2Gb of RAM, it only had 512Mb. It also didnt have a DVD-RW as described. Perhaps most importantly of all, the laptop didn't actually work! haha genius! Selling a 'working' laptop that doesn't work! Despite polite requests from the seller, I denied anything was wrong and refused to refund his money, then i agreed to but of course didn't. Then I claimed to have moved to Dubai and hoped he'd forget about it."

    4. Re:Sonds like a job for Judge Judy! by markbthomas · · Score: 1

      Even then I wouldn't make public requests. I'd just give him bad feedback.

    5. Re:Sonds like a job for Judge Judy! by TapeCutter · · Score: 1

      I think Judy was looking for some independent verification, such as a link to a complaint lodged through ebay.

      After reading a few posts I thought it's kind of silly to try and judge something like this based on a couple of web sites. I thought about posting a "conclusion mat" comment but changed my mind. For some reason the words silly and judge reminded me of Judy, so I made her the devils advocate.

      In simpler words: The quote means jack shit.

      --
      And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
    6. Re:Sonds like a job for Judge Judy! by EllisDees · · Score: 1

      The guy had ripped him off. Not only was the laptop non-functional, it was also not the laptop he had advertised for sale.

      The scammer got what he deserved.

      --
      -- Give me ambiguity or give me something else!
    7. Re:Sonds like a job for Judge Judy! by fm6 · · Score: 1

      I think if somebody stole $400 from you, you'd want more than bad feedback.

    8. Re:Sonds like a job for Judge Judy! by soft_guy · · Score: 1

      The reality is that if you buy anything on eBay costing more than about $20, your chances of being ripped off are very high. There is very little recourse available when this happens. This is why I will not buy anything more expensive than about $20 on eBay. I buy vintage video game carts on eBay, I buy laptops from the Apple Store.

      --
      Avoid Missing Ball for High Score
  84. I have mixed feelings about this by Zaatxe · · Score: 2, Interesting

    It's hard to know where the truth is... they usually say the truth lies between the two versions of the story.

    I really have mixed feelings about this. I agree that when you are cheated on, the punishment has to be harsher than the cheating itself to discourage future cheatings. We can't know if the laptop wasn't really working and if the memory and CD/DVD driver specifications where incorrect, but most of us agree this laptopguy is ruining the boy's life.

    Anyway, just to tell you an anedoct of my own life, I once honked to a guy who cut my way on the street. I just honked. It wasn't a long honk, I didn't yell or anything. I just thought "he didn't see me, I will honk and make my presence known". But the guy started to slow down in front of me and then waved a gun. I turned in the corner between us and sped away from there. The lesson I learnt that day:

    Don't mess with who you don't know, you have no idea what the reaction will be!

    And about leaving sensible information in a computer you are selling, sorry, but it's all your fault. Like an old chinese saying goes (I swear it's a real old chinese saying, I'm not making it up), "he who sleeps with his ass dirty wakes up with the fingers stinking".

    --
    So say we all
  85. yea thats cool by Danzigism · · Score: 1

    I think the fashion police should be questioning the crazy bastard who would spend £375 on any laptop with that horrible Teal color..

    --
    *plays the Apogee theme song music*
  86. Ebay and the laptop price Curve by Deliveranc3 · · Score: 1

    You can find a desktop PC capable of running Windows XP and with a DVD rom and usb ports for about $50 if you really look but laptops capable of running modern applications (not games of course, or linux) seem to level off around $300-400 (And most of those have garbage batteries).

    So people inevitably look on E-Bay...

    Ebay could intervene at this point, instead we get to see that E-bay, paypal and indeed this guy's credit card company's policy of buyer protection doesn't work at all.

    You can't buy this kind of publicity.

    And this guy has opened himself to criminal charges for taking pictures of people without their consent.

    Even the Canadian (I don't know about the U.S.) standard postal service has tracking numbers, if you're shipping something provide the tracking # it takes a load off the buyers mind.

    1. Re:Ebay and the laptop price Curve by BenjyD · · Score: 1

      In the UK, I don't think you need permission to take photos of someone unless they had a "reasonable expectation of privacy" at the time it was taken.

  87. Re:I would not hire the 'buyer'. Hope it backfires by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hi Amir.

  88. Re:Wisdom follows, pay attention! by minuszero · · Score: 1

    more wisdom for you:
    it's GBP, not UKP
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GBP

  89. Stay anonymous... by VlartBlart · · Score: 0

    Looks like a good story for a blatant plug :)

    Anonymous email you can reply to http://www.anonomail.net./

  90. don't agree with any of it by sl4shd0rk · · Score: 1

    sounds like the seller was ripping people off. The buyer put this guys personal life out for the world to see, and is now making google-ching off it. That's fucked up. Yeah the seller should have known better, but most people just don't. The buyer is also fucking up the lives of this guys family who didn't have anything to do with the sale, just to get his idea across. Sounds like a form of terrorism to me.

    --
    Join the Slashcott! Feb 10 thru Feb 17!
  91. Romania did not exist when Vlad was alive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Romanian state was founded in the XIX Century and Vlad the Impaler lived centuries before that. He was the ruler of some other small country which belonged to the Ottoman Empire and hundreds of years later became part of Romania.

  92. Re:Unverifiable? Let's give it a go... by benneja1 · · Score: 1

    /agree

  93. Re:Wisdom follows, pay attention! by jacksonj04 · · Score: 1

    We all understand the $ symbol, what's wrong with a £?

    --
    How many people can read hex if only you and dead people can read hex?
  94. Re:Unverifiable? Let's give it a go... by warrigal · · Score: 2, Interesting
    I've really no trust in feedback in any case. A while back I bought a couple of low-priced items on ebay. The seller informed me that the goods would ship once I posted "good feedback". The rest of the seller's items on ebay were similarly low-value. Feedback-farming, anyone?

    A threat of bad feedback got my purcases shipped.

  95. Re:Wisdom follows, pay attention! by Lummoxx · · Score: 1

    I don't have that key on my keyboard.

    --

    I am a viral sig. Please copy me and help me spread. Thank you.

  96. probably not true by CupBeEmpty · · Score: 1

    And this guy has opened himself to criminal charges for taking pictures of people without their consent.

    This is probably not true. In the US at least it is legal to take pictures of anything that can easily be seen from a public place (the tube definitely counts). I can't imagine that it is much different in the UK. There is no need to ask people for their permission.

  97. It should also be noted ... by NoSalt · · Score: 1

    It should also be noted that the seller did not send out the laptop for 2 months ... that'd piss me off too. Although, probably not to this extent.

  98. Think before you sell. by ABoerma · · Score: 1

    In other words: dd if=/dev/random of=/dev/hda

  99. The seller of that laptop... by rob1980 · · Score: 1

    According to the screencap of the Ebay auction the seller had a feedback of 0 - with 50% positive. How dumb do you have to be to cough up 375 pounds to what effectively is some stranger on the street offering to sell you a laptop? It sucks the buyer got screwed, but he really kind of opened himself up to the problem.

  100. ebay rule of thumb by s31523 · · Score: 1

    I wonder what the ebay seller's feedback rating was/is?

    Buyer should have emailed the seller prior to the purchase with any questions about the laptop, especially "does it really work or has it had any problems in the past?" This way you have a record so that you can go after him through ebay. From the here-say article, the buyer never asked for a refund, just went out and shamed the seller, so if that's true there is obviously an alteror motive.

  101. Uhhmm,Property Rights? by jtwJGuevara · · Score: 1

    Ok, so the seller just gave the buyer the property of a laptop in exchange for money. So now the laptop is owned by the buyer. Does not the buyer now own all uncopyrighted material on the laptop's harddrive and is free to use it how he/shee sees fit within the bounds of the law?

    1. Re:Uhhmm,Property Rights? by prshaw · · Score: 1

      And what is "uncopyrighted material"?

      Everything has a copyright, the owner may grant unlimited use of the work but they still own the copyright.

  102. "Threats"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I question who the "threats" are coming from.

    The buyer didn't post Amir's phone number. While it's certainly easy enough to find out someone's home phone number, I have a feeling that it's not strangers making these threats. My guess is that the threats are coming from the folks who are actually in the photos that Amir so idiotically left on his hard drive.

    I don't base that on any reality, of course. I just know that if I'd posed for pron and near-pron photos, and those photos wound up featured on a web site because my friend was stooooopid, I'd threaten him, too.

  103. It MIGHT not have been a scam by the seller by ylikone · · Score: 3, Insightful

    There is the possibility (remote, yes, I know) that the seller did ship a working laptop which just broke on transit... OR the buyer has a grudge against the seller and the laptop works fine, he's just getting revenge for something else (but it's highly unlikely). See, this is why we have laws in place to deal with things instead of vigilante justice, because when people take matters into their own hands, they can never truly know the whole story or if they are acting properly instead of just out of emotion.

    --
    Meh.
    1. Re:It MIGHT not have been a scam by the seller by vorpal22 · · Score: 1

      That is, of course possible, but it doesn't justify the lies that were told about the laptop. The purchaser was informed that this was a company laptop and belonged to an employee of the seller. This was obviously false. The purchaser also bought the laptop with the impression that it had a DVD+/-R drive and 2 GB of RAM, when it did not have said drive and only sported 512 MB of RAM. Obviously, there was a lot of dishonesty involved in this transaction, regardless of whether or not the laptop was working when it was sent out.

  104. I'm with the minority with this one. by DeanFox · · Score: 5, Insightful


    Maybe I need to do some soul searching but I think what the buyer did was outstanding. Yet, at least at my moderation setting, comments are running 5 to 1 against the buyer.

    Maybe it's because my home has been broken into 5 times by neighborhood kids. Or, that a box of checks was stolen and someone wrote $2000+ against my checking account. Or, that I've had my CC number stolen and everything from kitchen appliances and plane tickets were charged to my account. Maybe it's just because I'm sick and tired of the scum inhabiting this planet. But I think what the buyer did is great and we need more of it.

    The light has been shown on this Amir guy for what he is. Public humiliation is a sensible, non-violent form of deterrent and socially acceptable. The police publish the names of "Johns" arrested for solicitation for all to see. Even the Bible supports public humiliation as a deterrent. The Bible says on judgment day all will be known and nothing hidden and exposed for all to see. Our (USA) and (English) early judicial systems used public square stocks and humiliation as a formal sentence.

    The buyer has done his due diligence. All the documentation is there. The seller took 2 months to ship and only after repeated requests. The seller also agreed to refund the money once called on the fact the laptop was junk but then reneged. The seller was given multiple opportunities to correct the problem. He just wasn't interested because he knew he was scamming the guy.

    I saw one post "If the guy kills himself, what a loss". A loss of what? The world would loose a scamming criminal who doesn't think twice about stealing other people's money? That's a loss I can bear.

    Maybe, just maybe, this Amir guy will learn a valuable lesson from his fellow brothers that so far his religion has failed to teach him. Maybe Amir will pull his life together, get some morals and become a valuable member of our society. Maybe, just maybe he's been given a second chance to come clean and make it right.

    JMHO

    -[d]-

    1. Re:I'm with the minority with this one. by erroneus · · Score: 1

      I know this is completely off topic, but since you brought it up...

      I put forward that religion doesn't teach right and wrong. The notions of right and wrong are generally accepted ideas with or without religion. Religion, in reality, claims the notion of right and wrong as its own creation after the fact. This is pretty well illustrated by societies without religion maintaining the same general notions of right and wrong as religious societies. Not stealing, not killing and 'being nice' are ideals generally taught, learned or otherwise appreciated by children well before they get religious teachings.

      That said, it's also clear through the conduct of many religious people that the notion of a religion even "reinforcing" the notions of right and wrong is a complete failure as well. You never have to look too far to find countless examples of "religious people" who are also guilty of terrible things. For that matter, it's quite common-place that people even USE religion as a rationale for doing bad things.

      So no only is religion falsely held as the original teacher of morals, it is often a detriment to the general society's moral standards and standing. One could attempt to claim "bad apples" in each of those events, but whatever the claim, religion doesn't work and doesn't serve the purpose claimed.

      And on a side note, some of the least religious societies I have visited are also the most moral. I cite Japan as an example of this. I am still awed to this day at how, as a society, people do the simple kindness of getting out of each others way in crowded transit areas like train stations. And the legends about losing a valuable item only to have it returned intact are largely quite true. And it doesn't take much investigating to find that these people are QUITE shallow in terms of religion.

  105. Re: For your viewing pleasure... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative
  106. The seller gave permission by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "The guy used the data without authorization "

    Incorrect. The seller *sold* the data to him. Did you forget that part?

    The seller sold the information to the guy, the guy did him a favor and didn't use any of the financial data, he just pointed out that the guy is likely gay and has a serious mental issue that he only finds the feet of women attractive.

    1. Re:The seller gave permission by Skye16 · · Score: 1

      I don't think that it can be considered a serious mental issue. Mental issue by itself, sure, maybe. Why not? We all have mental issues. I find the legs and ass of a woman attractive. Some dudes are partial to the boobs. I bet some guys out there are huge on noses or ears. If they let it affect their day to day life in a negative way, then yeah, maybe I'll buy "serious". Until then it's just "your thang". Or his thang, really.

      As for the horrible MS Paint art, that is a serious mental issue.

    2. Re:The seller gave permission by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Considering that the leg photos were all likely unuathorized by their subjects, I would have to say that is a serious mental issue.

  107. Re:Unverifiable? Let's give it a go... by linvir · · Score: 1

    Haha! Stay tuned for more from When Karma Whores Turn Pro!

  108. Because two wrongs don't make a right? by FatSean · · Score: 1

    I mean, as morals go, that's a basic one.

    --
    Blar.
  109. Re:Wisdom follows, pay attention! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That, my friend, is coming from a slashdotter. Ever heard of ASCII?

  110. Re:Wisdom follows, pay attention! by Intron · · Score: 1

    Its been replaced by the "€"

    --
    Intron: the portion of DNA which expresses nothing useful.
  111. Update Posted on The Register by Alfarinn · · Score: 1
    FYI...
    The buyer has been named as Thomas Sawyer, a 23-year-old student from Exeter. He offers to pull the site sown voluntarily in exchange for a refund. Meanwhile, The Daily Mail reports that Amir allegedly pulled a similar scam on Newport Pagnell woman Debbie McInerney, who says she paid him £147 for an iPod which never arrived. Amir said: "The police are investigating the iPod case and I can't comment on it."
    Looks like he's done this before.
  112. Re:The paki deserved it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    Hahaha... awesome troll. Watch the cries of 'racism' fly from all the humourless PCs...

  113. CFNM = amusing, but doesn't trump DVDA ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Amusing, but not so much as Orgazmo's popularizing of DVDA (and the band is funny, too)

    1. Re:CFNM = amusing, but doesn't trump DVDA ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      how great is it that a google image search for "DVDA pics" brought up this It actually is a dual vacuum dual advance (DVDA) distributor, and it has a retard hose to boot. With a little imagination you can make the connection.

  114. You are a fool. by syrrys · · Score: 0

    Seller sold laptop to buyer. Buyer now OWNZ the laptop...AND EVERYTHING ON THE DRIVE! Think about it. If you say that the seller can ask for the data back because it belongs to him, then that is like saying he can ask for the [ENTER] key back because he misses it. No no no. The seller is an ass and deserves what he got. Personally, I would have given the guy a chance before I posted the data online, but I'm a nice guy.

    --
    "Patience is not a virtue, it's a waste of time."
  115. Owner of the material on the laptop by Bigmell · · Score: 0

    Correct me if im wrong, but since that data was on the laptop that he BOUGHT, that means he now owns the data. And there is no law against posting *your* data on *your* website on the internet.

    The seller really shouldnt have any legal recourse. Of course posting the passport, bank information, etc would be kinda shady, but the buyer didnt do this he just posted the (embarassing) pictures.

  116. Re:Unverifiable? Let's give it a go... by phorm · · Score: 1

    How about reporting it to ebay. Forward those emails along, they do somewhat pay attention.

    Yes, bad sellers could create new accounts, but that does involve a credit card (for selling), which amateurs might run out after creating a few crap accounts.

  117. I would feel for the buyer, but... by jgoemat · · Score: 1
    He bought a laptop on ebay from a guy with 0 feedback score and only 50% positive feedback. Also the grammer in the ebay posting was terrible (spelling errors are right from the ebay listing):
    This is an office laptop that i gave to one of my employees who i have recently dismissed, there is nothing wrong with this laptop it just needs a charger, which needs a charger due to he stole the charger childishly. If you take it to any computer dealer they will be able to provide a charer no problem. Windows Xp, it's fast relaible and has never had a problem whats so ever. comes with all neccisary paper work...
  118. Re:Wisdom follows, pay attention! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Amir did, of course, completely misrepresent his IDENTITY to the buyer, thus it was probably a pretty safe assumption that those data the buyer recovered from the laptops HD were not Amir's anyway.

    If you are attempting to defraud, then uncovering your true identity is probably fair game in the course of defending oneself against you.

  119. Blame the Victim by JavaLord · · Score: 1

    It's the usual "Blame the Victim/The Criminal must be innocent!" mentality that goes on here. It's pretty sad actually. It's also nice to see someone get some 'real' justice without having to involve the government/authorities.

    1. Re:Blame the Victim by Crasoum · · Score: 1

      It's the usual "It was on a webpage so it must be true!" mentality that goes on here. It's pretty sad actually. It's also nice to see someone get some real justice by having to involve the government/authorities.

      See what I did there? Simply a different interpretation of the materials provided, it's how legal systems work. The only two people who know the truth, are the buyer and seller, I simply have my own doubt on the amount of proof given (None other then their own word).

  120. CAVEAT EMPTOR -- buyer beware (+ link to auction) by hardcorejon · · Score: 1

    While I have to admit this whole thing is quite hilarious -- I has to ask, was the buyer a total idiot? I mean, look at the seller's ebay profile:

    http://feedback.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewFeed back&userid=amir6626&iid=6825578528

    He had a NEGATIVE 2 rating, all based on auctions that took place BEFORE the auction that caused all the fury. Seriously, I think twice about buying from anyone who's had more than a couple negative feedbacks EVER. This guy did 4 auctions, 3 of which he screwed the buyers on. Caveat emptor dude....

    - jonathan.

  121. He sold the hard drive... by RexRhino · · Score: 1

    When he sold the hard drive, he sold the contents of the hard drive.

  122. mystery man by tverbeek · · Score: 1

    I'm just grateful to Amir for providing us with those snapshots of the shirtless mystery man. Dude: e-mail me!

    --
    http://alternatives.rzero.com/
  123. Happened to a friend of mine. by seebs · · Score: 1

    Step 1. Guy walks around offering "massages" to artists at convention.
    Step 2. Guy buys commission from an artist.
    Step 3. Guy yanks on a different artist's hand hard enough that it'll be weeks healing.
    Step 4. Guy comes back later, offers to "fix" whatever has required artist to put on wrist brace.
    Step 5. Guy doesn't even apologize, just walks away.
    Step 6. Artists, who are in same studio together, compare notes on guy.
    Step 7. Artist puts up pictures with full name.
    Step 8. ???
    Step 9. Profit!

    --
    My blog: http://www.seebs.net/log/ --- My iPhone/iPad app: http://www.seebs.net/seebsfrac/
  124. Beh. Why support either of them? by Piazzola · · Score: 1

    So where's the buyer's proof of his claims? He could have gotten those photos from just about anywhere. We shouldn't be cheering either of them, because they're both equally wrong. Seller: sounds like a scam artist. Kill with fire. Buyer: meeting a wrong with a wrong. Extortionist, and that stuff doesn't actually have to be of the seller in order to make his life hell, not to mention he was stupid enough to fall for the damn scam in the first place. Kill with fire too.

  125. Re:-1,000,000 Flamebait by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Silly faggot, dicks are for chicks!

  126. Re:Wisdom follows, pay attention! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    umm, no it wasn't...

  127. more to the story? by proudhawk · · Score: 1

    is it me or does there appear to be more to this
    story than is being published?

    there was mention of an i-pod that was not delivered, but
    nothing further (no comment).

    questions is:is this a scam or is he really the target of
    an online revenge?

    I guess that all the facts need to come out first before
    one can make a "value judgement" as to who is right and who was wronged.

    --
    Understanding is much like a 3-edged-sword. in this: there are always 2 sides and the truth.
  128. You can't take it back. by rdmiller3 · · Score: 1
    According to the article, the offended buyer promised to remove the buyer's private stuff from the web once he was refunded his money...

    Maybe he never heard of the "wayback machine".

    Once something is published on the web, anyone can store a copy of it. You can never be sure that someone, somewhere hasn't still got it. There is no way to "take it back".

  129. Re:Unverifiable? Let's give it a go... by Eil · · Score: 1

    The moral of the story here: always ALWAYS check the seller's stats before bidding on an item. I see what look like great deals all the time on eBay, but upon closer inspection, the seller rating is awful and when this is the case, there's a good chance that the seller is out to scam. My personal policy is to never buy from anyone with a seller rating below 15 and with a positive feedback percentage lower than 95%.

    How's a fella to start out on eBay then? Well, buying stuff is probably the easiest way. Also, many people don't have a problem bidding on low-rating sellers, so that's another avenue. Selling a bunch of low-cost items at first may help, although that could also raise a lot of red flags (it certainly would for me).

    I raised my seller rating by selling and buying textbooks for my classes on half.com. (Owned by ebay, so the account is shared between the two sites.) Here I'm less concerned with low-rating buyers since I realize a lot of them are college students. Dozens of purchases and I've only gotten almost scammed once: I recently bought a DVD and right after, the seller marked the item as shipped and went on "vacation." Tried to contact him, filed a claim, and ebay returned by money just yesterday.

    I've heard many horror stories of eBay refusing to refund money even for very obvious (and expensive) scams, though, so the best option is to just avoid them altogether if you can.

  130. Caveat and all that by fm6 · · Score: 1
    Bullshit. I've bought a fair amount of expensive hardware over the years on eBay (including two laptops), and never gotten stuck. The closest I ever came was when I bought a PDA from a flaky dude who kept telling me he'd send it to me as soon as he figured out where he'd put the charging cradle. Complaints to eBay and PayPal soon took care of that.

    Which is not to say that eBay isn't a risky place to buy stuff. I'm sure I'll get stung eventually. But I've managed to put that day off long enough to make eBay shopping a valuable resource. The trick is to be careful what you buy from who. I would certainly not bid $650 for an item being sold by somebody with no sales history!

  131. IT was vietnam i believe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I agree though, they should have shot the cunt.

  132. Re:Unverifiable? Let's give it a go... by Crasoum · · Score: 1

    ARG, a fine point I entirely glossed over, good show.

  133. Re: Oscar Wilde by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > gayness is well established in britain since Oscar Wilde.

    Not much up on your history, are you? Oscar Wilde was dragged through the courts and his career was destroyed due to his sexual orientation.

  134. Why do I feel a Rush song coming on? by Treacle+Treatment · · Score: 1

    "A modern day warrior Mean, mean stride Today's Tom Sawyer Mean, mean pride"

    -- TT

    --
    TT
  135. Amir? His religion? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And maybe this will just drive him to see the evils that greed and the free-market system create and be our next contestant on "Catch that Terrorist!"

  136. The question is just: How do you know he's guilty? by amarodeeps · · Score: 1

    I would reserve judgement until we know one way or the other, first of all. Secondly, I would think that someone referencing the bible as an authoritative document would be Christian, and thusly be a bit more willing to forgive...but what do I know, I'm not Christian.

  137. Re:The question is just: How do you know he's guil by sveinungkv · · Score: 1

    You don't have to be a Christian to refert to the Bible as an authoriative document. If your audience belive in the Bible it is effective. (Even if you are all out wrong, you still can get some goodwill for at least trying, but you risk great anger if they suspect you twist The Scripture on purpose) Even if your audience don't belive in the Bible, but they have some respect for it, you can get some of that respect by refering to it.

    He said "even the Bible". To me, that sounds like the last case. Not saying he is or is'nt a Christian, just saying there are other possibilityes.

    --
    Spelling/grammar nazis welcome (English is not my first language and I am trying to improve my spelling/grammar)
  138. Lelease the calebeals! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Let me at it! Here goes: I, for one, would be very sad if anything bad happened to any of these people. They need love and caring and not smug joking from heartless anonymous bastards! Let's all be friends! *hug*

  139. Did it really belong to the seller? by Kirth+Gersen · · Score: 1

    I only checked the first page of this story, but I didn't see anybody mention the obvious possibility that the seller was not the *owner* of the laptop, ie he had stolen it.

    Thus the person whose private life was exposed could have been doubly victimized.

  140. What about unrelease songs? by Hyperhaplo · · Score: 1

    Okay, let's change this a little:
    Let's say you buy a musician's laptop and it has an UNRELEASED song on it.
    Who ownes it?
    Who guy who made the song? or you?
    Released songs.. sure. Whomever claims the copyright first. You just have a copy. Unreleased works.. not sure, I am not a lawyer.

    --
    You have a sick, twisted mind. Please subscribe me to your newsletter.
    1. Re:What about unrelease songs? by WWWWolf · · Score: 1
      Let's say you buy a musician's laptop and it has an UNRELEASED song on it. Who ownes it? Who guy who made the song? or you?

      The guy who made the song. Copyright enters the force at the instant the thing is created (US law, for example, says "set in tangible form" or somesuch, which would also apply to a file on computer hard drive), not when the thing is first published.

      Copyright law, you see, covers who can release a copyrighted work, and what kind of limitations they can set to distribution. If you are not the copyright holder, by default, you can't release an unpublished work without permission.

      If someone decided to publish an unreleased song made by someone else and claimed it as their own, that would be definitely a fun court matter. =) However, I believe in some places it's possible to specifically register copyrights on certain works, even if they're not published publicly, thus strengthening their status in matters of dispute; this would make that court issue much simpler...

  141. Invasion of Privacy? How by technoCon · · Score: 1

    I'd like a little euro law lesson here. By my lights, the person bought the laptop as-is, including its hard disk and the data it carried. Doesn't he get the rights to whatever's written thereon? For instance, if buy Leonardo Da Vinci's notebooks their worth is significantly greater than blank sheets of paper. That's factored into the price. The seller is not bound to erase them before vending. The buyer did not receive anything he didn't pay for in the purchase price of the laptop.

    Lacking any agreement in place to the contrary, I believe the seller of a hard disk loses any claim its contents--even if the laptop arrived in pristine condition. Just because embarassing data wasn't an explicitly stated part of the bargain does not exclude it from the transaction. The buyer who now owns that data, by my lights, can do whatever he jolly well pleases therewith.

    IANAL, but I'd sure like an opinion on this.

  142. Re:Wisdom follows, pay attention! by minuszero · · Score: 1

    I don't have that (£) key on my keyboard.

    it's probably there somewhere.
    try [alt]+a number key of some sort, if it isn't a [shift]+number combination...

  143. Re:Wisdom follows, pay attention! by Lummoxx · · Score: 1

    My lamehumor tag was opened at birth, and has yet to be closed by the great HTML author in the sky, I guess.

    --

    I am a viral sig. Please copy me and help me spread. Thank you.

  144. Re:Wisdom follows, pay attention! by PhotoBoy · · Score: 1

    WTF are you talking about? The full name of the country is The United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland. To claim the national currency should be called UKP because Ireland was occupied is completely non-sensical. Please tell me you're not some American who has Northern Irish roots and supported their terrorist policies before the peace process?