Agreed. Assuming you didn't breach the rent agreement in which case you should become the trespasser.
(This statement is not perfectly pedantically correct, as laws may vary from state to state, and is not legal advice) If you have a valid rental contract you are not a trespasser on the property until they have a court order as the result of an eviction process, which is either a writ of eviction, a writ of restitution, or otherwise.
Namely, even if you are in breach of contract, you need a court to enforce terms of the contract, and until then your contract is presumed to be valid. (Imagine the case where a landlord, Alice, out of the blue claims a tenant, Bob, is in breach of their rental contract, and thus makes the claim that Bob is trespassing. However, Alice is simply fabricating a breach of contract. The courts would hold that Bob's contract is still valid, and that Alice's request for eviction is invalid. Because of this case, rental contracts are valid until voided by a court.)
I'm guessing you never saw a penny of that deposit back. And I'll bet lease renewal time was a bit steep on price increases if he even considered renewing you.
He was the brother of my boyfriend at the time, so we had not actually made a deposit. (The guy was a slum lord, in kind of every definition of that term.)
And the guy was harassing us and trespassing on our property... why in the hell would anyone chose to remain at such a property?
Although, I did put up with it for a bit, and just dealt with the police, and eventually had a restraining order, which should have kept him away, but because the guy was a psychopath, he ended up breaking into the property to steal my laptop and briefcase two days prior to our court hearing. That should have been a slam dunk for getting my restraining order enforced, right? Except my idiot boyfriend at the time had called him up a ton and harassed him back, so the judge threw everything out.
That very day immediately after the court hearing, I went home, packed up and moved in with a friend.
Um, if pf.conf so bad?:-D Seriously, I just edit it with vim. It's the easiest firewall system I've dealt with.
No, pf.conf isn't bad at all. But the XML file holds more than just my firewall rules. It holds all the information necessary to produce my named lists (forward and reverse), as well as my dhcpd.conf. Oh yeah, as well, it produces an HTML "netinfo" file which has all the network information in pretty print format, with links and all.
Basically, the XML file describes my whole network, and keeps things consistent so I don't have to keep things consistent by hand.
Not necessarily the "owner" of the property either. It's the person in possession of the property, (which is not necessarily the owner of the property.)
I've had a landlord trespassed off his own property before, because he was there harassing us.
Ugh. I went through the OpenBSD 4.7 upgrade torture test last weekend. For those who don't know what we're talking about, the firewall config file syntax change in a backward-incompatible way between OpenBSD 4.6 and 4.7. It wasn't possible to boot into the new system without largely rewriting the file, which is kinda inconvenient when the machine in question is your primary firewall.
It was a good upgrade and I like the new version better, but it wasn't exactly painless.
I fortunately have been generating my pf.conf from an XSLT on an XML file for a few years now, so it was a relatively simple matter of changing a single line in the file that is generating the XSLT*, and then using make. So, it was relatively pain-free for me.
*: Why am I using a file to generate the XSLT? Have you SEEN the XSLT language? It's horrible and designed for machines. The file I'm using adds a layer of abstraction that makes XSLT a useable language for human beings.
More importantly, you only need to read the documentation once. Unlike Linux, OpenBSD does not replace admin tools with functionally equivalent ones with a new interface every six months. If you learn how to use OpenBSD, then you know how to use OpenBSD, on any architecture. If you learn how to use Linux, then you know how to use one version of one distribution of Linux, probably on one architecture.
scrub in all reassemble tcp nat pass on $ext_if from $home_network to $internet -> ($ext_if:0)
However I have frequently seen the judge cross things off of orders, and make additions before signing it.
Granted, the purposed motion is just that "purposed", and the judge can pretty much rewrite the whole thing if he wants to. But this kind of order probably wasn't touched by the judge. Plus, it sounds better that the Belgian papers screwed themselves by trying to close all loopholes.
By far the most common of the three languages in Belgium is Dutch.
The German-speaking community in Belgium is tiny by comparison.
And with good reason, too, after having been run over by German armies twice in 30 years despite having declared neutrality beforehand and then having suffered the privations of 2 military occupations. It's about the same in Belgium as in Denmark: a really good way to get yourself ignored is to try to start a conversation in German.
Do you actually live anywhere near the Belgian-German border? My sister lives on the Maas, so she could spit on Belgium from her front door. (Ok, not quite, but close.) She also lives about 2km from the German border. She took me to a horse accessories place, and a person came in to get her riding shoes repaired, and spoke German to the attendant. My sister spoke Dutch to the attendant.
"Ok, but that's Flemland." My mother had a medical incident in Brussels, and we had an unscheduled two week extra stay. I spoke German, and got really as much traction with German as I did with English. I even purchased a copy of der Spiegel at the hospital giftshop. Hell, the first time I watched "A Dinner for One" was on TV in Brussels.
This idea that Europe has some dark brooding resentment to German, and will shun anyone who attempts to speak it, is at best an over-exaggeration of a minority. Only in the US do we have this idea that Germany continues to suffer ill thought for World War 2. My sister's husband speaks fluent German as well as Dutch, because that's what he had to learn, because they were the powerhouse economy. You can't really afford to snub the Germans in Europe, and even then, Germany now is a completely different place from when the Nazis are in power, and Americans would do well to get that through their thick skulls.
...from all their sites (Google News and "cache" Google or any other name)...
Heh. Be careful what you ask for. You might get it. Also sounds like the Judge is wearing his ass for a hat but that's so common it isn't newsworthy.
I'm not sure how this works in Belgium, but in the US, the moving party typically writes the order themselves, and the judge just signs off. So, it's entirely likely that the Belgian Newspapers screwed themselves by trying to ensure that there weren't loopholes to their order.
Why, it practically trips right off the tongue. Then plunges to its death.
It's a town in the Seattle area. So, it's likely a codename.
It's actually a Native American tribe and reservation (and casino of course) north of Seattle.
And as covered above, it's also a "town" being that the definition of town is vague in the USA. Go google maps "tulalip, washington" though, and you'll notice that it at the very least believes it to be a town. And likely people address mail that way.
That sounds like a big gamble... (oh ha ha. oh it hurts. ha ha. ha)
(To add a thin veneer of content to this otherwise horrible joke, Tulalip is a town near Seattle, much as Whistler and Blackcomb are nearby mountains. Tulalip is best known in the Seattle area for several casinos. I wouldn't be surprise if MS intended the name to be a nod towards the gamble of it all.)
Eh... more likely that Microsoft tends to prefer geographic internal naming schemes.
This actually sounds par for the course for one guy I knew. We had a restraining order against him, and what does he do? Breaks into our place and steals my briefcase full of evidence. Oh, as well, in the halls outside the courtroom, I pulled out a piece of evidence to remind him that he's screwed, to which he grabs it out of my hands and rips it up right there.
Psychopaths have no sense of consequence or regret. The former tends to get them in the most trouble, because they just do whatever comes to mind, and not "damned be the consequences" they never even considered the consequences.
Some psychopaths can get away with a lot if they're not, you know, murdering people (and even then they tend to get away with it for years) and the system is generally designed to go easy on people and assume good faith. So, even when they get caught, they tend to get out of it the first few times. But the real problem is that they will never let go, and never stop doing stuff to hurt themselves in the long run. They're far too used to being able to lie their way out of anything.
If this guy really is psychopathic, then honestly, we already know that there is no way to really cure him. He's permanently brain damaged. Therapy doesn't help either, because that just teaches them how to hide better. There isn't a government system in the world that really knows how to deal with psychopaths properly, and fairly. (Hell, just getting accurate diagnoses can be hard enough.)
3) Copyright is a human social construct that prevents the exploitation of creativity to the detriment of authors. Does this have any meaning in whatever system of exchange impresses monkeys?
Seems to me that if the photographer properly and adequately reimbursed the monkeys then the paper would have purchased said portraits by contract from the monkeys.
My passphrase WOULD actually increment me. So no, they can't have it.
The judge will give you immunity from prosecution that is based on whatever your passphrase incriminates you with. If you then don't cooperate, into the cell you go, until you change your mind.
This reasoning suggests that if you do have some criminal evidence in the encrypted file you'd better make a passphrase that is directly related to that crime - a confession, for example.
I'm not sure whether to be impressed or horrified.
It sounds like you're having the proper response.
Agreed. Assuming you didn't breach the rent agreement in which case you should become the trespasser.
(This statement is not perfectly pedantically correct, as laws may vary from state to state, and is not legal advice) If you have a valid rental contract you are not a trespasser on the property until they have a court order as the result of an eviction process, which is either a writ of eviction, a writ of restitution, or otherwise.
Namely, even if you are in breach of contract, you need a court to enforce terms of the contract, and until then your contract is presumed to be valid. (Imagine the case where a landlord, Alice, out of the blue claims a tenant, Bob, is in breach of their rental contract, and thus makes the claim that Bob is trespassing. However, Alice is simply fabricating a breach of contract. The courts would hold that Bob's contract is still valid, and that Alice's request for eviction is invalid. Because of this case, rental contracts are valid until voided by a court.)
I'm guessing you never saw a penny of that deposit back. And I'll bet lease renewal time was a bit steep on price increases if he even considered renewing you.
He was the brother of my boyfriend at the time, so we had not actually made a deposit. (The guy was a slum lord, in kind of every definition of that term.)
And the guy was harassing us and trespassing on our property... why in the hell would anyone chose to remain at such a property?
Although, I did put up with it for a bit, and just dealt with the police, and eventually had a restraining order, which should have kept him away, but because the guy was a psychopath, he ended up breaking into the property to steal my laptop and briefcase two days prior to our court hearing. That should have been a slam dunk for getting my restraining order enforced, right? Except my idiot boyfriend at the time had called him up a ton and harassed him back, so the judge threw everything out.
That very day immediately after the court hearing, I went home, packed up and moved in with a friend.
Um, if pf.conf so bad? :-D Seriously, I just edit it with vim. It's the easiest firewall system I've dealt with.
No, pf.conf isn't bad at all. But the XML file holds more than just my firewall rules. It holds all the information necessary to produce my named lists (forward and reverse), as well as my dhcpd.conf. Oh yeah, as well, it produces an HTML "netinfo" file which has all the network information in pretty print format, with links and all.
Basically, the XML file describes my whole network, and keeps things consistent so I don't have to keep things consistent by hand.
Not necessarily the "owner" of the property either. It's the person in possession of the property, (which is not necessarily the owner of the property.)
I've had a landlord trespassed off his own property before, because he was there harassing us.
Ooooo! Nifty cool, thanks for pointing that out!
Ugh. I went through the OpenBSD 4.7 upgrade torture test last weekend. For those who don't know what we're talking about, the firewall config file syntax change in a backward-incompatible way between OpenBSD 4.6 and 4.7. It wasn't possible to boot into the new system without largely rewriting the file, which is kinda inconvenient when the machine in question is your primary firewall.
It was a good upgrade and I like the new version better, but it wasn't exactly painless.
I fortunately have been generating my pf.conf from an XSLT on an XML file for a few years now, so it was a relatively simple matter of changing a single line in the file that is generating the XSLT*, and then using make. So, it was relatively pain-free for me.
*: Why am I using a file to generate the XSLT? Have you SEEN the XSLT language? It's horrible and designed for machines. The file I'm using adds a layer of abstraction that makes XSLT a useable language for human beings.
More importantly, you only need to read the documentation once. Unlike Linux, OpenBSD does not replace admin tools with functionally equivalent ones with a new interface every six months. If you learn how to use OpenBSD, then you know how to use OpenBSD, on any architecture. If you learn how to use Linux, then you know how to use one version of one distribution of Linux, probably on one architecture.
scrub in all reassemble tcp
nat pass on $ext_if from $home_network to $internet -> ($ext_if:0)
However I have frequently seen the judge cross things off of orders, and make additions before signing it.
Granted, the purposed motion is just that "purposed", and the judge can pretty much rewrite the whole thing if he wants to. But this kind of order probably wasn't touched by the judge. Plus, it sounds better that the Belgian papers screwed themselves by trying to close all loopholes.
By far the most common of the three languages in Belgium is Dutch.
The German-speaking community in Belgium is tiny by comparison.
And with good reason, too, after having been run over by German armies twice in 30 years despite having declared neutrality beforehand and then having suffered the privations of 2 military occupations. It's about the same in Belgium as in Denmark: a really good way to get yourself ignored is to try to start a conversation in German.
Do you actually live anywhere near the Belgian-German border? My sister lives on the Maas, so she could spit on Belgium from her front door. (Ok, not quite, but close.) She also lives about 2km from the German border. She took me to a horse accessories place, and a person came in to get her riding shoes repaired, and spoke German to the attendant. My sister spoke Dutch to the attendant.
"Ok, but that's Flemland." My mother had a medical incident in Brussels, and we had an unscheduled two week extra stay. I spoke German, and got really as much traction with German as I did with English. I even purchased a copy of der Spiegel at the hospital giftshop. Hell, the first time I watched "A Dinner for One" was on TV in Brussels.
This idea that Europe has some dark brooding resentment to German, and will shun anyone who attempts to speak it, is at best an over-exaggeration of a minority. Only in the US do we have this idea that Germany continues to suffer ill thought for World War 2. My sister's husband speaks fluent German as well as Dutch, because that's what he had to learn, because they were the powerhouse economy. You can't really afford to snub the Germans in Europe, and even then, Germany now is a completely different place from when the Nazis are in power, and Americans would do well to get that through their thick skulls.
...from all their sites (Google News and "cache" Google or any other name) ...
Heh. Be careful what you ask for. You might get it. Also sounds like the Judge is wearing his ass for a hat but that's so common it isn't newsworthy.
I'm not sure how this works in Belgium, but in the US, the moving party typically writes the order themselves, and the judge just signs off. So, it's entirely likely that the Belgian Newspapers screwed themselves by trying to ensure that there weren't loopholes to their order.
"Tulalip"?
Why, it practically trips right off the tongue. Then plunges to its death.
It's a town in the Seattle area. So, it's likely a codename.
It's actually a Native American tribe and reservation (and casino of course) north of Seattle.
And as covered above, it's also a "town" being that the definition of town is vague in the USA. Go google maps "tulalip, washington" though, and you'll notice that it at the very least believes it to be a town. And likely people address mail that way.
Actually...it's a native american tribe from the area. You are right about it being a codename, though.
Actually, it's both. (Recognizing that in America "town" can be pretty much meaningless, as the term is so vague.)
That sounds like a big gamble... (oh ha ha. oh it hurts. ha ha. ha)
(To add a thin veneer of content to this otherwise horrible joke, Tulalip is a town near Seattle, much as Whistler and Blackcomb are nearby mountains. Tulalip is best known in the Seattle area for several casinos. I wouldn't be surprise if MS intended the name to be a nod towards the gamble of it all.)
Eh... more likely that Microsoft tends to prefer geographic internal naming schemes.
They should have named it Puyallup. Nobody but locals ever pronounces that right.
But cars cost less there!
"Tulalip"?
Why, it practically trips right off the tongue. Then plunges to its death.
It's a town in the Seattle area. So, it's likely a codename.
This actually sounds par for the course for one guy I knew. We had a restraining order against him, and what does he do? Breaks into our place and steals my briefcase full of evidence. Oh, as well, in the halls outside the courtroom, I pulled out a piece of evidence to remind him that he's screwed, to which he grabs it out of my hands and rips it up right there.
Psychopaths have no sense of consequence or regret. The former tends to get them in the most trouble, because they just do whatever comes to mind, and not "damned be the consequences" they never even considered the consequences.
Some psychopaths can get away with a lot if they're not, you know, murdering people (and even then they tend to get away with it for years) and the system is generally designed to go easy on people and assume good faith. So, even when they get caught, they tend to get out of it the first few times. But the real problem is that they will never let go, and never stop doing stuff to hurt themselves in the long run. They're far too used to being able to lie their way out of anything.
If this guy really is psychopathic, then honestly, we already know that there is no way to really cure him. He's permanently brain damaged. Therapy doesn't help either, because that just teaches them how to hide better. There isn't a government system in the world that really knows how to deal with psychopaths properly, and fairly. (Hell, just getting accurate diagnoses can be hard enough.)
I believe Knuth's answer is black (or by his own webpage an orange-ish brown) on pastel yellow.
Yes, this is what allows me to watch Youtube at work, amongst other things.
Did you mean to post this as AC?
The out of sync stuff is just Hulu. Don't worry about that. My Win7 experience is the same.
3) Copyright is a human social construct that prevents the exploitation of creativity to the detriment of authors. Does this have any meaning in whatever system of exchange impresses monkeys?
Seems to me that if the photographer properly and adequately reimbursed the monkeys then the paper would have purchased said portraits by contract from the monkeys.
Evidence from an illegal search can be readmitted through inevitable discovery.
My passphrase WOULD actually increment me. So no, they can't have it.
The judge will give you immunity from prosecution that is based on whatever your passphrase incriminates you with. If you then don't cooperate, into the cell you go, until you change your mind.
This reasoning suggests that if you do have some criminal evidence in the encrypted file you'd better make a passphrase that is directly related to that crime - a confession, for example.
So, my ideal passphrase is "I shot the sheriff"?
No, unfortunately...I think I just renamed it 'irc' or 'company-irc' or similar.
For a University build, I named it "bx", but then I wasn't really trying to hide the name's origins...
BitchX uses the Revised BSD License. I could download the code, rename it "HappyFunTimeIRCClient" and everything would be in order with the copyright.