IF Windows XP alone takes up 300MB (which I must admit I doubt) then good luck squeezing the rest of those apps (especially Office 2k3) into the remaining 212 MB:-)
Oh,and then there's the matter of wsftp-server costing money (unless you want the crippled free version for home-use only),Office 2k3 costs a lot of money and mirc is also payware,same goes for nero.
Even if you managed to get those things installed it would end up costing several times the cost of the PC alone in software
I've used VMware on both Debian testing and stable recently with ReiserFS,and it works very well.
For the application we were testing it actually performed a lot better than using ESX-server or Vmware Server.
I've always Oc'ed my comps.If you can go faster then why not ? I OC'ed my 486 Dx2 66 to 80 MHz,486 dx5 133 to 160 MHz,pentium 100 to 120 MHz,pentium 2 350 to 392 MHz,my Celeron 300 to 450 MHz, dual celeron 333 to dual 480 MHz and right now my P3 700 is at 952 MHz and still climbing.I just can't help it. I also tuned my car from 125 hp to 145 hp..Guess I'm addicted to speed:-)
Slashdot Mirror
IF Windows XP alone takes up 300MB (which I must admit I doubt) then good luck squeezing the rest of those apps (especially Office 2k3) into the remaining 212 MB :-)
,same goes for nero.
Oh,and then there's the matter of wsftp-server costing money (unless you want the crippled free version for home-use only),Office 2k3 costs a lot of money and mirc is also payware
Even if you managed to get those things installed it would end up costing several times the cost of the PC alone in software
That's odd. I had better performance in Linux using Wine than in Windows when playing Counter Strike some years ago.
I've used VMware on both Debian testing and stable recently with ReiserFS ,and it works very well.
For the application we were testing it actually performed a lot better than using ESX-server or Vmware Server.
agree. It's like allofmp3 offereing far superior music download service than any other site I've seen
Yeah talk about interfering with 802.11 :o)
..That's 250 USD down the drain..Glad the company pays :-)
I can't use my fancy Bluetooth Headset at work after we got 802.11
Anyways,my experience with Bluetooth hasn't been god..Very difficult to get the devices to communicate and very unstable connectivity at best..
I've always Oc'ed my comps.If you can go faster then why not ? I OC'ed my 486 Dx2 66 to 80 MHz,486 dx5 133 to 160 MHz,pentium 100 to 120 MHz,pentium 2 350 to 392 MHz,my Celeron 300 to 450 MHz, dual celeron 333 to dual 480 MHz and right now my P3 700 is at 952 MHz and still climbing.I just can't help it. :-)
I also tuned my car from 125 hp to 145 hp..Guess I'm addicted to speed
/ce
a mendicone core based Celeron owns RC5...Maybe even one of the coppermine based ones as RC5 is not very dependant on cache, but more raw fpu..
/ce
Check this: http://www.dailyrush.dk/quake3/content/stories/Sho wStory.php3?StoryID=539
best regards
ce
#!/bin/sh
MAC=`ifconfig eth0 |awk '/HWaddr/ {print $5}'`
IP=`tcpdump -nc1 ether dst $MAC and icmp[0]=8 |awk '/echo request/ {sub(":","",$4);print $4}'`
echo $IP