(manslaughter for the intended target that gave an address? I'm not sure that applies but haven't read the full charges as they aren't in any of the links).
I don't understand that either. I read some of the surrounding articles but don't see why he is too blame. The only thing I can think of is that he could have warned the cops this was going to happen or not provided a fake address - assuming he knew that a swat was going to take place.
Good question and one of the questions they immediately asked (reported in the article) was something like "was that the assailant?"
I'm not saying the cop shouldn't be sued or even fired. But I do think that there was enough going on to not throw the cop in jail.
And I do think the ones that caused the situation deserve to be charged with involuntary manslaughter. Their actions are what set the whole thing in motion. The cop was not just sitting outside this guy's house for no reason.
Confession... I do allot of reading of Slashdot at work.
games.slashdot.org is blocked by the opendns filter we use.
I put that information in another post but I don't expect you to read all my posts. I'm only able to read this story because it wasn't posted on the game section of Slashdot.
If I was trolling, I wouldn't have bothered to list out what I read from the articles. I don't purposely troll but I imagine I'd be a pretty lazy troller.
I'm more conservative and disagree with most of your stances but you must have said something I liked here since I friended you:)
Just curious, and you probably can't really go into detail, but how many of these issues are what you support versus what are mandated by your party? (I'm not saying you are selling out - more like "I don't feel strongly about this - or have no opinion - so I can toss my support to what the party says." I'm sure what core principals you have are non-negotiable so please don't think I am questioning your integrity. I just imagine being part of a political party (either party) carries some obligations for that party.)
I can tell you wrote most of it yourself just based on the wording and how detailed you were. Wish you the best of luck even if I hope you switch to red:)
The police did their own review as well as a citizen review board. You have to read through several links to get to that. The information is in this article http://www.kansas.com/news/loc.... I can't access the game subsection on Slashdot at work so maybe the information is there as well.
We have the advantage of 20/20 hindsight here. You have to realize that if the situation describe over the phone was actual true, not taking the shot could have gotten an entire family killed.
I read the linked article. The Slashdot summary really sucks. It doesn't even mention the death or what swatting is. I had to read the article for that.
The police where told that the man had killed his father, was holding his mother and sibling hostage and had soaked the house in gasoline. The man was a dead man walking the moment police where called. With the information they had, they didn't have the luxury to take their time to fully access the situation.
I honestly support the civil lawsuit. It's easy to see in the video that the victim did nothing to deserve to die. But criminal standards are higher and I completely understand why the police had to act in the manner they did. It was not exactly presented to them in a "we can wait and see what happens" context.
The person who did the swat (sorry - new word for me so not sure how to use it properly) completely bears the responsibility of the victim's death and deserves the full weight of the law brought down on him. The fact that he did this before is shocking and it is amazing that no one else was hurt. One of the stories mentioned this happened in Canada but that the victim was warned and was able to call the police and give them the heads up that it was a false report.
Nor the tax breaks for the ultra rich including Wall Street. Want me to go on?
She'd raise taxes on the rich while giving them loopholes to get out of it. This is a woman who has made a fortune giving speaches to banks and Wall Street while not alllowing transcripts of those speaches to be released.
This is the closest thing you're correct on. And it was done by mostly a continuation of the military strategies implemented under the Obama administration. Thanks Obama!
He let them become the force they were. His stance on the threat of ISIS "“The analogy we use around here sometimes, and I think is accurate, is if a jayvee team puts on Lakers uniforms that doesn’t make them Kobe Bryant,”"
what hyperbolic bullshit. What it does is get the companies that have moste benefited from the vast amount of taxpayer fuded inrastructure to contribute back a bit more.
Is this there true then Seattle would rejoice at the idea of Amazon leaving their city
Other than the jobs they give and the benefits they pay for? Why do you think COBRA health insurance costs so much? Because the employer isn't subsidizing it anymore.
Companies that choose to overpopulate an area for the sake of the benefits of the tech structure there should pay the costs to correct the problem.
Or do what they are threating to do and move to other cities, right? Doesn't that solve the problem you just described (I'm sure Seattle would love to lose all these tech jobs and employment opportunities.)
Of course it is. How would we even count the homeless in that number? Head count? And I'm sure a great many of them have fallen into the "chronically unemployed/not looking for a job category" that for some reason doesn't count toward the unemployment numbers.
It is interesting. Definitely something that a rich city with a small to medium size population that doesn't have to worry about immigration can consider
Slashdot Mirror
So, hypothetically, what's to stop someone from making a call like this about your house and the same happening to you?
Hopefully the idea that they will be charged with murder like these kids.
(manslaughter for the intended target that gave an address? I'm not sure that applies but haven't read the full charges as they aren't in any of the links).
I don't understand that either. I read some of the surrounding articles but don't see why he is too blame. The only thing I can think of is that he could have warned the cops this was going to happen or not provided a fake address - assuming he knew that a swat was going to take place.
Good question and one of the questions they immediately asked (reported in the article) was something like "was that the assailant?"
I'm not saying the cop shouldn't be sued or even fired. But I do think that there was enough going on to not throw the cop in jail.
And I do think the ones that caused the situation deserve to be charged with involuntary manslaughter. Their actions are what set the whole thing in motion. The cop was not just sitting outside this guy's house for no reason.
Confession... I do allot of reading of Slashdot at work.
games.slashdot.org is blocked by the opendns filter we use.
I put that information in another post but I don't expect you to read all my posts. I'm only able to read this story because it wasn't posted on the game section of Slashdot.
If I was trolling, I wouldn't have bothered to list out what I read from the articles. I don't purposely troll but I imagine I'd be a pretty lazy troller.
They were not shooting the gun in the house....
A bullet isn't actually a flaming arrow or whatever you seem to think it is.
This was very informative. Thank you for the response and best of luck to you.
Have you ever shot a gun before? It's not like on TV. You go for the largest point of the target.
Heck, read the story.
His hand was on his storm door when the shot was fired, and the bullet ricocheted into him, Bennett said.
There is no way this cop could have hit the leg.
I read your page.
I'm more conservative and disagree with most of your stances but you must have said something I liked here since I friended you :)
Just curious, and you probably can't really go into detail, but how many of these issues are what you support versus what are mandated by your party? (I'm not saying you are selling out - more like "I don't feel strongly about this - or have no opinion - so I can toss my support to what the party says." I'm sure what core principals you have are non-negotiable so please don't think I am questioning your integrity. I just imagine being part of a political party (either party) carries some obligations for that party.)
I can tell you wrote most of it yourself just based on the wording and how detailed you were. Wish you the best of luck even if I hope you switch to red :)
The police did their own review as well as a citizen review board. You have to read through several links to get to that. The information is in this article http://www.kansas.com/news/loc.... I can't access the game subsection on Slashdot at work so maybe the information is there as well.
We have the advantage of 20/20 hindsight here. You have to realize that if the situation describe over the phone was actual true, not taking the shot could have gotten an entire family killed.
I read the linked article. The Slashdot summary really sucks. It doesn't even mention the death or what swatting is. I had to read the article for that.
The police where told that the man had killed his father, was holding his mother and sibling hostage and had soaked the house in gasoline. The man was a dead man walking the moment police where called. With the information they had, they didn't have the luxury to take their time to fully access the situation.
I honestly support the civil lawsuit. It's easy to see in the video that the victim did nothing to deserve to die. But criminal standards are higher and I completely understand why the police had to act in the manner they did. It was not exactly presented to them in a "we can wait and see what happens" context.
The person who did the swat (sorry - new word for me so not sure how to use it properly) completely bears the responsibility of the victim's death and deserves the full weight of the law brought down on him. The fact that he did this before is shocking and it is amazing that no one else was hurt. One of the stories mentioned this happened in Canada but that the victim was warned and was able to call the police and give them the heads up that it was a false report.
The EU has a law stating Amazon has to sell items to people that return too many items?
So you want to hold Facebook accountable for other people leaking your information?
Where did I post that?
I doubt she'd hang out with anyone at your level unless there were a ton of cameras around to get credit for it.
I'm 100% certain she wouldn't be playing much golf.
Agreed. She can't even stand up for a full rally much less play 18 rounds of golf.
most certainly not for renting golf carts for the Secret Service agents who are supposed to take a bullet for her.
She'd just tell them to fuck off. https://nypost.com/2015/10/02/...
Nor the tax breaks for the ultra rich including Wall Street. Want me to go on?
She'd raise taxes on the rich while giving them loopholes to get out of it. This is a woman who has made a fortune giving speaches to banks and Wall Street while not alllowing transcripts of those speaches to be released.
Ok - then you can't hold any of these companies responsible for user security if they have to be interoperable with every wanna be social service
If we can't get people that exclusively use a service to chose stop using the service they are using, then that service is a monopoly?
No one is forced to sign up for a facebook account. People use it because that is where their friends are.
> ISIS - No longer a major threat.
This is the closest thing you're correct on. And it was done by mostly a continuation of the military strategies implemented under the Obama administration. Thanks Obama!
He let them become the force they were. His stance on the threat of ISIS "“The analogy we use around here sometimes, and I think is accurate, is if a jayvee team puts on Lakers uniforms that doesn’t make them Kobe Bryant,”"
In order to get the superuser prompt, you need to be rooted. So anyone effected by this update should be able to remove the app
what hyperbolic bullshit. What it does is get the companies that have moste benefited from the vast amount of taxpayer fuded inrastructure to contribute back a bit more.
Is this there true then Seattle would rejoice at the idea of Amazon leaving their city
Other than the jobs they give and the benefits they pay for? Why do you think COBRA health insurance costs so much? Because the employer isn't subsidizing it anymore.
Companies that choose to overpopulate an area for the sake of the benefits of the tech structure there should pay the costs to correct the problem.
Or do what they are threating to do and move to other cities, right? Doesn't that solve the problem you just described (I'm sure Seattle would love to lose all these tech jobs and employment opportunities.)
Of course it is. How would we even count the homeless in that number? Head count? And I'm sure a great many of them have fallen into the "chronically unemployed/not looking for a job category" that for some reason doesn't count toward the unemployment numbers.
I'm not rich but I want a huge mansion with a yard. Why would only a rich person want that?
It is interesting. Definitely something that a rich city with a small to medium size population that doesn't have to worry about immigration can consider