Every time someone accuses Hillary of doing something nefarious with these emails I picture explaining to my mother that she will need to use two different email accounts for different purposes and the resulting blank looks that would ensue.
Your mother was the Secretary of State?
Your mother is running for president?
Your mother has a staff that could have set up the phone for her to receive emails from two addresses?
I really doubt your mom has the resources and training that Hillary has. The only thing your statement demonstrates is that a lot of people will not realize this is a big deal because they have no idea how things work.
It doesn't matter how often you tell him this. He will keep posting the same incorrect facts.
I don't know if people do this because they believe it so much they have blinders, they never check if someone replies to their posts, or that they are trying to get others to believe it knowing there will not be a fact correction every time they post a falsehood.
Is it just me, or when they say "private e-mail server" does any body else mentally picture an old Dell desktop PC sitting in a broom closet somewhere?
We plan to add our own APIs based on the needs of existing Firefox add-ons.
NoScript-type functionality. This would come in the form of extensions to webRequest and possibly contentSettings.
Sidebars. Opera already supports sidebar functionality; Chrome may soon. We would like to be able to implement Tree Style Tabs or Vertical Tabs by hiding the tab strip and showing a tab sidebar.
So I guess we will see if it's available be for they end support for XPCOM
The thing is, he is giving more of a plan than we had for a long time and doing it in sound bites and quick phrases.
This is something the democrats mastered with Obama and to a lesser agree, Bill.
During the last debate against Romney, you had Obama making one liners "the 1990's call and they want their enemies back" while Romney was droning on about facts and numbers.
The Republicans need more flash and more boldness (not the boldness that is immediately followed by an apology.) Hopefully the other republicans learn from Trump not to be so damn afraid of the press and their own shadow.
The establishment thought including him in this race would be funny, stir things up a little, get some laughs. Now they've realized what a horrible, horrible mistake they've made because Trump is utterly unpredictable yet also completely irresistible to the media.
Very true. I'd add that they gave him coverage at the beginning to shame him (after his comments on immigration) but had no idea how shameless he was. If they knew he would have turned that around and even used it to propel him, they wouldn't have ran the initial stories.
You can't have a debate with people who call you racists the instant you say something they don't like. We are fed up with people like you who do that.
This times 100! It is why Trump is doing so well and why throwing these names at him just boosts him up more.
And that's the real issue. Trump makes a lot of claims and promises that would require Congress to cooperate, and looking at how Trump scores on the whole "get along with other people" index, it suggests that his Presidency, rather than being some great revolutionary change, would be four very long years of him shouting crude abuses at Congressional leadership.
So more of the same? I guess he can switch to executive orders like our current president.
I'd be inclined to see whether his various business ventures have exhibited this sort of hiring policy; or whether he's a "Buy American!" sort of guy when looking for votes; and a buy Mexican sort of guy when looking for labor...
You either have not been paying attention or are just trying to pose a question knowing the answer may make Trump look bad. He has already said that he hires based on the best deals. He runs a business, not a church. He is trying to get things changed so that "buying American" is something doable again.
When I try to swipe a card that has the chip at Walmart, the machine tells me I have to insert the card instead. For stores that don't have the chip, swiping works.
You pick Visa and then you don't worry about your card not being accepted. Seriously, I can't remember the last time a merchant didn't take visa if they took cards at all.
Slashdot Mirror
Every time someone accuses Hillary of doing something nefarious with these emails I picture explaining to my mother that she will need to use two different email accounts for different purposes and the resulting blank looks that would ensue.
Your mother was the Secretary of State?
Your mother is running for president?
Your mother has a staff that could have set up the phone for her to receive emails from two addresses?
I really doubt your mom has the resources and training that Hillary has. The only thing your statement demonstrates is that a lot of people will not realize this is a big deal because they have no idea how things work.
I still don't understand why this is so bad, especially to the point of being compared to the Nixon tapes.
It's the cover up (wiping the servers) which make it just like the Nixon tapes.
It doesn't matter how often you tell him this. He will keep posting the same incorrect facts.
I don't know if people do this because they believe it so much they have blinders, they never check if someone replies to their posts, or that they are trying to get others to believe it knowing there will not be a fact correction every time they post a falsehood.
Is it just me, or when they say "private e-mail server" does any body else mentally picture an old Dell desktop PC sitting in a broom closet somewhere?
Close...
It was kept in the bathroom
Her servers where ran out of a bathroom of a huge democrat supporter
http://www.theblaze.com/storie...
Really - you see Ted Cruz or Rand Paul more in favor of these restrictions than Hilary?
We hear this all the time, but after all is said and done, the democrats have always have and spend more money than republicans during elections/
That's not really possible when you consider that left and right are political spectrum.
Also, we are talking American politics not European.
On the first link
We plan to add our own APIs based on the needs of existing Firefox add-ons.
NoScript-type functionality. This would come in the form of extensions to webRequest and possibly contentSettings.
Sidebars. Opera already supports sidebar functionality; Chrome may soon. We would like to be able to implement Tree Style Tabs or Vertical Tabs by hiding the tab strip and showing a tab sidebar.
So I guess we will see if it's available be for they end support for XPCOM
It looks like they will be supporting the old addons (using XPCOM and XUL) with firefox for at least another year
There's an old saying: 'If it ain't Boeing, I ain't going.'
Citation needed. I do not believe anyone has ever said this.
I have never used this saying (I don;t pay attention to the maker of the plane I'm on. But a quick google search of that phrase shows it is a saying.
https://www.google.com/search?...
Who's willing to join me on a Right-to-be-forgotten campaign about the f***ing Kardashians?
But then who will Hillary Clinton hand out with during the republican debates?
http://www.theguardian.com/us-...
There are other ways to download stuff that does not involve sharing. Heck, even bittorent can be set not to share.
I guess the bank thing is going to be brought in every discussion of jail times or fines, huh?
That's a different job. It gets paid differently.
The thing is, he is giving more of a plan than we had for a long time and doing it in sound bites and quick phrases.
This is something the democrats mastered with Obama and to a lesser agree, Bill.
During the last debate against Romney, you had Obama making one liners "the 1990's call and they want their enemies back" while Romney was droning on about facts and numbers.
The Republicans need more flash and more boldness (not the boldness that is immediately followed by an apology.) Hopefully the other republicans learn from Trump not to be so damn afraid of the press and their own shadow.
The establishment thought including him in this race would be funny, stir things up a little, get some laughs. Now they've realized what a horrible, horrible mistake they've made because Trump is utterly unpredictable yet also completely irresistible to the media.
Very true. I'd add that they gave him coverage at the beginning to shame him (after his comments on immigration) but had no idea how shameless he was. If they knew he would have turned that around and even used it to propel him, they wouldn't have ran the initial stories.
You can't have a debate with people who call you racists the instant you say something they don't like. We are fed up with people like you who do that.
This times 100! It is why Trump is doing so well and why throwing these names at him just boosts him up more.
And that's the real issue. Trump makes a lot of claims and promises that would require Congress to cooperate, and looking at how Trump scores on the whole "get along with other people" index, it suggests that his Presidency, rather than being some great revolutionary change, would be four very long years of him shouting crude abuses at Congressional leadership.
So more of the same? I guess he can switch to executive orders like our current president.
Or any succeed under his watch.
I'd be inclined to see whether his various business ventures have exhibited this sort of hiring policy; or whether he's a "Buy American!" sort of guy when looking for votes; and a buy Mexican sort of guy when looking for labor...
You either have not been paying attention or are just trying to pose a question knowing the answer may make Trump look bad. He has already said that he hires based on the best deals. He runs a business, not a church. He is trying to get things changed so that "buying American" is something doable again.
Everything is a "War on" something now, right?
Sometimes it seems like the problem people have with No Child Left Behind is that a Republican suggested it.
I don't know anyone that says that.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
Not as many people are executed as most people think, though (35 last year.)
When I try to swipe a card that has the chip at Walmart, the machine tells me I have to insert the card instead. For stores that don't have the chip, swiping works.
You pick Visa and then you don't worry about your card not being accepted. Seriously, I can't remember the last time a merchant didn't take visa if they took cards at all.
Sams Club stores only take MasterCard and Discover
http://help.samsclub.com/app/a...