since programmers are about as easy to get pointed in the same direction as cats.
Idiotic statement. Programmers are easily pointed in the same directions as anyone else: With money. You want to point people, who work for free in an open source project, in the same direction? Yep, a bit more difficult. As it is for any other voluntary working group.
Thanks, but don't tell me. Tell the numbskulls here, who think everything is equivalent and deserves equal payment, just because it is done predominantly by women.
Do you have a degree in gender studies? No? Then stop throwing around scientific papers. You are not qualified to decide what is good science and what not. But even for cavemen like you, it should be easy to see that this paper is crap... look at the men/women... erm... sorry... I mean women/men ratio of the authors.
You did not read my previous post?/. articles are a perfectly good explanation. If one follows enough feminist crap an intelligent person can come only to one conclusion: Women are generally inferior or have an extremely inferior and parasitic character. Though don't worry, they are still one notch above the manginas... really nothing below them.
It is always said that there are more women in STEM fields from 3rd world countries. Simply since they have no choice, So, women can function in those fields. They just contradict their inherently parasitic nature. So if society wishes to have more women in STEM... make them. There rarely is a problem to force men to do things they don't want.
PHP... knowing CPU.. Assembly... very funny. Typical legend building by feminists and their lapdogs. The handling of the earliest computers was extremely tedious... flipping many switched, punching holes in cards. Boring and unthinking tasks. Just the tasks women prefer: Simple, with no responsibilities, non-competitive. The computer women back then were no developers, they were just a different kind of secretary. As soon as this changed they left in droves... voluntarily. Even today, when women "code" one can safely assume that it is not the next operating system, programming language, speech recognitions software, but some nice window decoration or flower buttons... with man made frameworks, of course.
When a woman can do it, it is less worth. Women always strive to grab the lowest hanging fruits. Programming was a ladies job? Too bad it became more complicated and scientific. So only natural the pay went up. And comparing nurses with doctors... ridiculous.
Sadly not too many articles, but we fought off several infiltration attempts from both 'gender sides'. Though the proposed anti-woman articles were that primitive that I suspect SJW sockpuppets.
Slashdot Mirror
Idiotic statement. Programmers are easily pointed in the same directions as anyone else: With money. You want to point people, who work for free in an open source project, in the same direction? Yep, a bit more difficult. As it is for any other voluntary working group.
Meritocracy is soooo misogynist.
You ask quite a lot from an estrogen poisoned brain.
Thanks, but don't tell me. Tell the numbskulls here, who think everything is equivalent and deserves equal payment, just because it is done predominantly by women.
Do you have a degree in gender studies? No? Then stop throwing around scientific papers. You are not qualified to decide what is good science and what not. But even for cavemen like you, it should be easy to see that this paper is crap... look at the men/women... erm... sorry... I mean women/men ratio of the authors.
You caveman misogynist... bringing arguments to a gender discussion. Even worse... patriarchical pseudo-science... shame on you.
You make it sound your are joking.
You did not read my previous post? /. articles are a perfectly good explanation. If one follows enough feminist crap an intelligent person can come only to one conclusion: Women are generally inferior or have an extremely inferior and parasitic character. Though don't worry, they are still one notch above the manginas... really nothing below them.
Noooo... only when it benefits the parasites.
Yes, I know... I simply cannot sugar coat the truth.
/. taught me this is true. Is reinforced almost every Friday/Saturday.
I have. But in real science. With reproducible results.
Gender studies don't count. They are not scientific.
That was the case before feminism turned women into cherry picking parasites.
Absolutely not.
Absolutely yes.
It is always said that there are more women in STEM fields from 3rd world countries. Simply since they have no choice, So, women can function in those fields. They just contradict their inherently parasitic nature. So if society wishes to have more women in STEM... make them. There rarely is a problem to force men to do things they don't want.
Thank you, but his honour clearly belongs to the feminist lapdogs, which week by week spew articles like this into /.
PHP... knowing CPU.. Assembly... very funny. Typical legend building by feminists and their lapdogs. The handling of the earliest computers was extremely tedious... flipping many switched, punching holes in cards. Boring and unthinking tasks. Just the tasks women prefer: Simple, with no responsibilities, non-competitive. The computer women back then were no developers, they were just a different kind of secretary. As soon as this changed they left in droves... voluntarily. Even today, when women "code" one can safely assume that it is not the next operating system, programming language, speech recognitions software, but some nice window decoration or flower buttons... with man made frameworks, of course.
This article came too late and unexpected. All the SJWs are sleeping. Don't worry. Will be 'Troll' in a few hrs.
When a woman can do it, it is less worth. Women always strive to grab the lowest hanging fruits. Programming was a ladies job? Too bad it became more complicated and scientific. So only natural the pay went up. And comparing nurses with doctors... ridiculous.
I am very often here:
http://pipedot.org/
Sadly not too many articles, but we fought off several infiltration attempts from both 'gender sides'. Though the proposed anti-woman articles were that primitive that I suspect SJW sockpuppets.
Replace what?
But this is exactly what they try to do. Of course as usual the female way: Nagging, whining, blaming, lying.
I know. So what? They want hatred. They get hatred. For serious discussions I go elsewhere. I would never write anything constructive on /. anymore.
Handhold women? Who demands that? Women are strong and independent... they don't need to be coddled... The only thing they need is men to be hobbled.
Believing a woman would not only be a problem, but a real disaster. "Men" who do this regularly should be put under tutelage.