it seems kerala Govt did not evaluate thier need for software, they just joined anti M$ camp to be in the news. linux is free but not support, they can not ask Redhat/Suse to freely support ultimatly they have to pay. linux is good for developement and can handle good load (if it is used as server). now how kerala govt is going to use linux in schools, it has bloated office suite and average user feel difficult to use.
--mad
how can mac system which is clubbed in one enclosure give 5.1 exp,i still love to see wireless 5.1 speakers (quality is very important).i don't think wireless can beat wired sound systems
web crawlers are used by certain class of people/websites to aggregate certain kind info this is certainly denying functionality for such users, but when we look at large scale web2.0 ( most people say it as hype, whatever) looks good. infact the idea (when it is in initial stage) looks great. mostly this is driven by trust on the TP API,availabilty of the info (book marks might not work), certain parts of the web page may take ages to load, there are N number of dependencies. this thing is not for serious business
Slashdot Mirror
it seems kerala Govt did not evaluate thier need for software, they just joined anti M$ camp to be in the news. linux is free but not support, they can not ask Redhat/Suse to freely support ultimatly they have to pay. linux is good for developement and can handle good load (if it is used as server). now how kerala govt is going to use linux in schools, it has bloated office suite and average user feel difficult to use. --mad
how can mac system which is clubbed in one enclosure give 5.1 exp,i still love to see wireless 5.1 speakers (quality is very important).i don't think wireless can beat wired sound systems
i would like to see wireless power(electricity) isn't it cool :-) , but still security,health is a concern with wireless devices,
web crawlers are used by certain class of people/websites to aggregate certain kind info this is certainly denying functionality for such users, but when we look at large scale web2.0 ( most people say it as hype, whatever) looks good. infact the idea (when it is in initial stage) looks great. mostly this is driven by trust on the TP API,availabilty of the info (book marks might not work), certain parts of the web page may take ages to load, there are N number of dependencies. this thing is not for serious business