Slashdot Mirror


Indian State Encourages Microsoft Removal

cultrhetor writes "The New York Times reports that the communist government in the Indian state of Kerala is trying to remove Microsoft from its public institutions, as part of a campaign against monopolistic corporations. From the article: 'schools and public offices across the state are being encouraged to install free software systems instead of purchasing Microsoft's Windows programs. "It is well-known that Microsoft wants to have a monopoly in the field of computer technology. Naturally, being a democratic and progressive government, we want to encourage the spread of free software," M. A. Baby, the state's education minister, said by telephone.' The government is not banning Microsoft, but it is actively encouraging all 12,500 public schools in the state to install Linux."

298 comments

  1. Dupe sorta. by popeyethesailor · · Score: 1
    1. Re:Dupe sorta. by ryanduff · · Score: 0

      We're going to implement a new rule for the mods here at /.

      Instead of RTFA, its going to be RTFS (Read the Fuc*ing Site) before you post a story and help avoid all the duplicates. I'm tired of deja vu at 5AM every morning when I open my news reader. Its a bad start to the day and confusing as hell!

    2. Re:Dupe sorta. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      download School GNU/Linux http://www.edugrid.ac.in/webfolder/download/school Gnu/slgnu.html from here. It is used by the schools in kerala.

  2. Cautiously optimistic by NaCh0 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Revenge is sweet but we should be careful as to not let any one linux company become the next microsoft.

    1. Re:Cautiously optimistic by belmolis · · Score: 4, Informative

      Because of the GPL, it isn't possible for a Linux company to develop the kind of control that Microsoft has.

    2. Re:Cautiously optimistic by bky1701 · · Score: 1

      So long as they remain GNU (and don't pull any red-hats), the risk is minor. One linux company/group would fix a lot, and it doesn't really close it, just makes it more standardized. Think a linux with all the same support for apps, drivers and such.

    3. Re:Cautiously optimistic by babbling · · Score: 3, Interesting

      If Linux starts to take off, you'll see Microsoft themselves start a distribution. I actually find it amazing that they have stuck with Windows. If they used Linux, they would be able to forget about needing to maintain all of the low-level operating system stuff and could put more effort into locking people into their brand of Linux.

      This is something that the Free Software community will need to start thinking about, soon. How do we prevent that from happening?

    4. Re:Cautiously optimistic by babbling · · Score: 3, Informative

      Because of the GPL, it isn't possible for a Linux company to develop the kind of control that Microsoft has.

      Actually, it is. Due to the LGPL being used in most libraries, it is possible for a company to develop proprietary software on top of Linux. For example, if Microsoft had a Linux distribution, they could create MS Office for Linux, which only runs on Microsoft Linux.

      I think the LGPL will eventually turn out to be a huge tactical mistake.

    5. Re:Cautiously optimistic by giorgiofr · · Score: 1

      It's easy: you don't. If you respect other people's freedom, that is. Including the one to shoot themselves in the feet.

      --
      Global warming is a cube.
    6. Re:Cautiously optimistic by babbling · · Score: 1

      ... and then what do you do when they start sending you .DOC files that will only work in MS Office 8?

    7. Re:Cautiously optimistic by Scarblac · · Score: 1

      Why would we want to prevent it?

      --
      I believe posters are recognized by their sig. So I made one.
    8. Re:Cautiously optimistic by ajs318 · · Score: 1
      I think the LGPL will eventually turn out to be a huge tactical mistake
      Agreed. I think the GNU project have gone soft lately. I hope the next GNU C library is straight GPL, with no permission even for linking from unfree software. Can you fork an LGPL project and release it straight GPL, or does the LGPL insist for all derivative works also to lie back and think of England?
      --
      Je fume. Tu fumes. Nous fûmes!
    9. Re:Cautiously optimistic by giorgiofr · · Score: 1

      The same thing you do today: you suck it up. If you want you can start using another format which they cannot read. Or you can put your money where your mouth is and use the market to push your product against theirs. Funny how freedom takes on a whole new meaning when it's applied to people who disagree with you!

      --
      Global warming is a cube.
    10. Re:Cautiously optimistic by mrvan · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I think you're being silly. The whole point is that the OS should be free, which includes my freedom to develop proprietary software if I see fit. It's your choice to buy or donwload my software or not. Making the C library GPL will simply restrict the freedom of people to develop for linux, which will no be beneficial to the platform at all.

    11. Re:Cautiously optimistic by init100 · · Score: 3, Informative

      I think the LGPL will eventually turn out to be a huge tactical mistake.

      Why would it be better if the LGPL libraries would have been GPL instead? The reason to be for the LGPL is that it should be unnecessary to have two libraries doing the same thing on the same system. If we would take as an example the GNU Libc, using the GPL instead of the LGPL would force users that want to run GPL-incompatible software to install a sepatare Libc that allows linking for such software. Thus, the LGPL was created for free software that has equivalent non-free software, such as GNU Libc. Free software that does not have non-free equivalents, such as Readline, are licensed under the GPL.

    12. Re:Cautiously optimistic by ajs318 · · Score: 1

      No, it's no more your choice to develop unfree software if you wish than it is your choice to stab whoever you choose with your own knife.

      All the fruits of all human endeavour belong to all of humanity. You may have written that software, but it does not belong to you: it belongs to everyone. As a human being, you have certain rights. Other people have exactly the same rights too. Your rights translate to other people's obligations, and other people's rights translate to your obligation. As a human being, your obligation is to improve -- or at least not worsen, such as by denying an individual their rights -- the lot of humanity as a whole.

      Each of us has four basic rights which spring directly from the existence of software. These are: the right to ENJOY the use of software without restriction, the right to STUDY how software works, the right to SHARE software with their neighbours to improve the lot of humanity as a whole and the right to ADAPT software to their needs. These rights, in turn, translate to an obligation incumbent upon everyone who creates software to uphold the rights of its users.

      If you do not allow me to make copies of software for other people, or if you do not allow me access to the source code and thereby prevent me from studying and adapting software, then that is an example of you imposing your will upon me. I consider that to be an act of violence, and I reserve the right to use reasonable force to defend myself.

      I advocate no loss of life, nor damage to tangible property; only to false "intellectual property".

      --
      Je fume. Tu fumes. Nous fûmes!
    13. Re:Cautiously optimistic by mrvan · · Score: 1

      aha! You ARE silly :-) We have a fundamental difference of opinion, which is OK. I love FOSS software, and I believe it is fully capable of competing head-on with closed software and prove itself superior. Banning closed software, as you seem to propose, is removing freedom, not granting it.

    14. Re:Cautiously optimistic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      What a load of crap.

      Stabbing someone, either with "your own knife" or someone elses is a harmful act. Choosing not to give out source code is neutral at worst. Nobody is forcing you to use their "unfree" software, and they are under no obligation to give you anything. You are the one curtailing freedom and insisting on control, not the software developer.

      You argument basically boils down to "I want everything for free. Anyone who doesn't give me what I want is evil!" - the argument of a five year old.

      People like you make it harder for free software to be taken seriously, as you give the impression that the open source/free software crowd are just a bunch of freeloaders.

    15. Re:Cautiously optimistic by ElleyKitten · · Score: 1
      ... and then what do you do when they start sending you .DOC files that will only work in MS Office 8?
      Ask them why they're using 10 year old office programs?
      --
      "What is Internet Explorer 7? Are you saying we can't access the normal internet?" - I love tech support. Really.
    16. Re:Cautiously optimistic by bentcd · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The question, as always when discussing copyleft, is whose freedom to conserve/constrain.
      The GPL conserves the freedom of the user of software at the (apparant and short-term) expense of the freedom of the software's author.
      The copyleft idea is therefore, in principle, to cull Stalin's freedom in favour of increasing the freedom of Soviet citizens :-)

      --
      sigs are hazardous to your health
    17. Re:Cautiously optimistic by Nutria · · Score: 1
      All the fruits of all human endeavour belong to all of humanity.

      What kind of fantasy world do you live in?

      --
      "I don't know, therefore Aliens" Wafflebox1
    18. Re:Cautiously optimistic by IflyRC · · Score: 1

      Revenge!? So you're happy that Linux and Communism could become synonomous? Just put up a graphic of Tux goose stepping across the red square and be done with it.

    19. Re:Cautiously optimistic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Only one question remains with such beautiful comment.. does it imply I can have a dinner at yours? Cause I'm really starving. :P

    20. Re:Cautiously optimistic by ajs318 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Closed-source software is no more nor less than electronic subjugation; and subjugation is evil whatever form it takes. Therefore, it deserves to be banned.

      On the other hand, it might not need to be banned: it's possible that a technological development could make it obsolete. Closed-source software survives only because the operation of taking some binary machine code and generating equivalent source code -- that is, source code which, when compiled, will produce a bitwise identical binary -- is currently hard. However, it is certainly not impossible. When there exists a viable "uncc", everyone's rights to STUDY and ADAPT will be upheld.

      Of course, there is no reason why a program written in one language should not be decompiled into another language. This would enable two people who do not have a programming language in common to collaborate on a project.

      --
      Je fume. Tu fumes. Nous fûmes!
    21. Re:Cautiously optimistic by the_womble · · Score: 1
      Due to the LGPL being used in most libraries, it is possible for a company to develop proprietary software on top of Linux.

      yesm and without the LGPL there would be no Oracle, real player etc. fr Linux

      For example, if Microsoft had a Linux distribution, they could create MS Office for Linux, which only runs on Microsoft Linux.

      How? The MS versions of LGPLed libararies would still be FOSS so a version of MS Office that ran only on their libraries could still run on any distro.

    22. Re:Cautiously optimistic by ajs318 · · Score: 1

      As long as you supply your own food, and you pay me for the extra energy used in cooking yours + mine as opposed to mine alone {which will be less than half the total, since some of it is going into the pan and the air in the kitchen}, then, yes.

      If I light my unlit candle from the flame of your lit one, we now have two lit candles and your room does not get any darker when I take mine away than it was before. That is an example of sharing without diminution. On the other hand, if I cut a pie in half and gave half to you, we would have only half a pie each -- not a whole pie each. That is an example of sharing with diminution.

      See the difference?

      --
      Je fume. Tu fumes. Nous fûmes!
    23. Re:Cautiously optimistic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That would have to be the most idiotic, idealistic crap I have ever heard. If I spend my time writing something, it is my option to sell it. How is that any different than you making a chair, and I demand you give it to me for free? Its nutjobs like you that give FOSS a horrible name. FOSS is not a religion. FOSS is a way of colabaration, by which software is producted in a more efficient way that traditional means.

      Hop down off your soapbox before you fall off and hurt yourself.

    24. Re:Cautiously optimistic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Revenge is sweet...
       
      Revenge for what? This is something that has always burned my ass about the Linux community and has made me cautious of ever being involved. Instead of people developing and using Linux because it's a good OS it seems more of them use it because they have some grudge against MS. Get over it already. If you think you are using the best OS out there why do you still feel the need to bitch and moan about another?
       
      Frankly I just see it as small minded people who can't produce on their own so instead they feel the need to back someone elses product to feel that they are somehow part of something bigger.

    25. Re:Cautiously optimistic by pammon · · Score: 1
      you do not allow me access to the source code and thereby prevent me from studying and adapting software, then that is an example of you imposing your will upon me.

      You insist that I give you my source code, but you think I'm the one imposing my will on YOU? How rich!

    26. Re:Cautiously optimistic by ajs318 · · Score: 2, Insightful
      If I spend my time writing something, it is my option to sell it. How is that any different than you making a chair, and I demand you give it to me for free?
      It's different because in the first case, you still have the software you wrote even after I had taken my copy of it; whereas in the second case, I no longer have the chair. If you want a better comparison, think in terms of you measuring my chair with your own instruments, and fabricating your own chair from identical materials sourced by you, with the end result that we each have a chair. I have no objection to that.
      --
      Je fume. Tu fumes. Nous fûmes!
    27. Re:Cautiously optimistic by babbling · · Score: 1

      The problem we face is that most people are not intelligent enough to see the difference. Also, most people no longer understand the concept of freedom, and have ceased to care about it.

    28. Re:Cautiously optimistic by BrokenHalo · · Score: 1

      Having said that, if MS did in fact produce a version of MSOrifice for Linux, a great many people would be very happy, and it might even sell.

      Of course, that might be the final nail in the coffin for Windows, but I think I can live with that.

    29. Re:Cautiously optimistic by BrokenHalo · · Score: 1

      .. and then what do you do when they start sending you .DOC files that will only work in MS Office 8?

      Same as always. I'll use OOo. If that won't read the document, it probably isn't worth reading anyway.

    30. Re:Cautiously optimistic by bdonalds · · Score: 1

      "All the fruits of all human endeavour belong to all of humanity. You may have written that software, but it does not belong to you: it belongs to everyone." Yikes! Check out some history books to see how well this philosophy works out. ...or you could just apply for a job at the 20th Century Motor Company.

      --
      The most important thing to do in your life is to not interfere with somebody else's life. -FZ
    31. Re:Cautiously optimistic by SSCGWLB · · Score: 1

      This is unbelievable ignorant. I am a software engineer, the software I write belongs to myself or the people who paid me to write it. If I CHOOSE to make it free (provided its mine to begin with), that is my right NOT my responsibility. Nobody has any inherent right to the fruits of my labor. If I spend a year building a house, with materials/tools I own on my land, its my house. Following your logic, the house I built becomes *hug* humanities *hug* house. That might be fine with you, but thats your business. Alone that same line of thought, if I spend a year writing a piece of software, using my tools and my time, that software belongs to me.

      BTW, the next time I am in England, I look fowardard to the right to ENJOY the use of your home without restriction, the right to STUDY how your home works, the right to SHARE your home with my neighbours to improve the lot of humanity as a whole and the right to ADAPT your home to my needs.

      Thanks!

      ~nate

    32. Re:Cautiously optimistic by Atzanteol · · Score: 1

      All the fruits of all human endeavour belong to all of humanity.

      I completely agree comrad! BTW, I'll be by this weekend to pick up 'our' car for a trip I'm taking over the weekend. And I'm sure you wouldn't mind lending me a few hundred of 'our' dollars for spending while I'm away?

      --
      "Ignorance more frequently begets confidence than does knowledge"

      - Charles Darwin
    33. Re:Cautiously optimistic by ajs318 · · Score: 1
      BTW, the next time I am in England, I look fowardard to the right to ENJOY the use of your home without restriction, the right to STUDY how your home works, the right to SHARE your home with my neighbours to improve the lot of humanity as a whole and the right to ADAPT your home to my needs.
      Provided you can think of a way to do that without interfering with my use of my home {to any greater extent than my using a copy of a piece of software you wrote would interfere with your use of your copy of it}, I have no problem with you doing just that.

      {You might think of a way while you're looking up the difference between rivalrous and non-rivalrous goods. Bonus points if you can devise an experiment to measure how much dimmer the picture gets on your TV set when someone else turns on their set which is tuned to the same station, or how much less impressive the Grand Canyon looks when someone else starts looking at it.}
      --
      Je fume. Tu fumes. Nous fûmes!
    34. Re:Cautiously optimistic by plague3106 · · Score: 1

      If that happens, that wooshing sound you here will be ever major vendor abondoning Linux / GNU.

    35. Re:Cautiously optimistic by plague3106 · · Score: 1

      All the fruits of all human endeavour belong to all of humanity. You may have written that software, but it does not belong to you: it belongs to everyone. As a human being, you have certain rights.

      Where do you live? I want to look at a new TV and car. I'm sure you won't mind me just taking them.

    36. Re:Cautiously optimistic by plague3106 · · Score: 1

      As long as you supply your own food, and you pay me for the extra energy used in cooking yours + mine as opposed to mine alone {which will be less than half the total, since some of it is going into the pan and the air in the kitchen}, then, yes.

      Why should I provide my own food? Food and electricity are the fruits of humanity, which we all have a right to.

      Drop the candle on your carpeting, and soon the house which 'we' own is totally gone.

    37. Re:Cautiously optimistic by Cromac · · Score: 1

      What liberal arts university have you been locked away in for years? No one who lives in the real world and actually works for a living would have that mentality.

    38. Re:Cautiously optimistic by ajs318 · · Score: 1
      Food and electricity {which actually is used only for a brief moment by my cooker, since it's gas fired, but I'll be generous and assume you meant the generic $FUEL} are rivalrous goods. That is, once one person has used them, nobody else can use them.

      By contrast, software is non-rivalrous: me making a copy does not affect the ability of the person who owned the original to make use of it. Please, you and everybody else, learn the difference in order not to look like idiots. Or do you genuinely believe that a sunset will look less beautiful if someone else is looking at it with you, and that your radio will get quieter when someone else switches theirs on?

      Drop the candle on your carpeting, and soon the house which 'we' own is totally gone.
      You really have been watching too many films.

      Being generous {to you -- I hate carpets} and pretending I had carpet, which I don't -- just wood, laminate, quarry tiles and bare concrete -- dropping a candle would still be bloody unlikely to set fire to it. What almost invariably happens when a candle is dropped is that the flame goes out. This happens on the way down. Some liquid wax will be distributed, but this isn't actually very inflammable {look up the etymology of "paraffin" sometime}. The wick will probably have time to cool while falling. Carpets in synthetic fibres are not particularly inflammable, and carpets in natural fibres much less so; even a still-lit candle is unlikely to have the energy to ignite a carpet.

      The most likely thing that will happen if you drop a candle onto a carpeted floor is that you will have to clear up a bit of spilt wax {WD40 will do the last bits, but that stuff is inflammable, so take care using it}. There probably won't even be any permanent discolouration. If you are horrendously unlucky, it might smoulder a little bit and you will have to stamp on it. But you definitely won't get a conflagration.
      --
      Je fume. Tu fumes. Nous fûmes!
    39. Re:Cautiously optimistic by plague3106 · · Score: 1

      By contrast, software is non-rivalrous: me making a copy does not affect the ability of the person who owned the original to make use of it. Please, you and everybody else, learn the difference in order not to look like idiots.

      Sorry, but you are looking like the idiot. First, you never qualified anything; you gave some grand, retarded statement.

      Second, software is only worth nothing if it costs nothing to make. The fact that you can copy it without depriving someone else of the original is not the point; the point is that to get people to create software you they expect to be paid for their effort. Linux is taking off because companies have tried to make money off of it. Remove every paid open source programmer who is being paid to work on it, and I'm willing to bet it wouldn't be nearly as far along as it is now.

      Finally, if I create something, its mine, and I don't HAVE to share it if I don't want to. Going to your chair example, if YOU find the chair pleasant or useful, then you should be willing to pay for either the specifications or for me to build you one. See, that's what freedom is about. I can share it for free, but I also may choose not to. There's nothing morally wrong with either choice. There is something morally wrong with trying to take away the makers freedom.

    40. Re:Cautiously optimistic by foobsr · · Score: 1

      Check out some history books ...

      OTOH, some anthropology might give some more unbiased insights.

      CC.

      --
      TaijiQuan (Huang, 5 loosenings)
    41. Re:Cautiously optimistic by AnyoneEB · · Score: 1

      Microsoft probably has not gone to Linux because they have this rather well designed kernel called the Windows NT kernel, which works quite well. On the other hand, I hear some of their applications have some security problems.

      --
      Centralization breaks the internet.
    42. Re:Cautiously optimistic by Danga · · Score: 1

      By contrast, software is non-rivalrous: me making a copy does not affect the ability of the person who owned the original to make use of it. Please, you and everybody else, learn the difference in order not to look like idiots. Or do you genuinely believe that a sunset will look less beautiful if someone else is looking at it with you, and that your radio will get quieter when someone else switches theirs on?

      You are the one who is looking like an idiot. While you making a copy of software that I sell for my livelihood does not affect my ability to still use the software it still would deprive me of the money I should have received from you for your right to have a copy to use. So essentially you would be taking food out of my mouth, thanks. You can preach all day long about how great it would be for all software to be open source and free but that will not change the fact that by copying something that a person solely depends on to make a living is not depriving them of anything.

      I think FOSS is great, if I have a small project I am working on in my free time that I think someone else can get some use out of it then I have no problem releasing it to anyone who wishes to use it. On the other hand if I spend 40+ hours a week planning and coding an application that I wish to sell then it damn well does belong to me and you have no right whatsoever to copy it at your own will. If you don't agree with my line of thinking then don't buy or use my software, you may find a FOSS version that is similar but for a lot of applications (especially specialized ones) closed source versions are superior hands down and the money paid is worth the quality of the product as well as the support received.

      Put down the pipe and come back to the real world buddy.

      --
      Hey, there is only one Return and it's not of the King, it's of the Jedi.
    43. Re:Cautiously optimistic by Musrum · · Score: 1

      Real propety != Software. I understand your confusion. Your masters have told you otherwise.

      --
      In Soviet Amerika the ballot boxes YOU!
    44. Re:Cautiously optimistic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Some of us use Linux and promote its use because of the illegal behaviours of Microsoft. Others do so because of the heavy hand with which Microsoft tries to control US and OUR computers if we use programs that we BOUGHT that they produced. Others have become fed up with the ways in which Microsoft increasingly spies on us. Myself its all 3.

      Microsoft needs to obey the law and allow customers to use the products they buy in the ways the LAW allows not the way Microsoft wishes them to.

    45. Re:Cautiously optimistic by dangitman · · Score: 1
      Same as always. I'll use OOo. If that won't read the document, it probably isn't worth reading anyway.

      Until you lose your job for not reading it, I guess you could consider it unimportant. Every day, things that are vital to people's livelihoods are saved in the most ridiculous formats one could imagine. It sucks, but that's reality. Which is more important - your own life, or software freedom and compatibility?

      --
      ... and then they built the supercollider.
    46. Re:Cautiously optimistic by The+Stars+Look+Down · · Score: 1

      Nine words:

      There ain't no such thing as a free lunch.

      --
      "Money is the barometer of a society's virtue." - Ayn Rand Atlas Shrugged
    47. Re:Cautiously optimistic by BrokenHalo · · Score: 1

      Until you lose your job for not reading it, I guess you could consider it unimportant.

      My point was that I have yet to come across a .doc file that OOo can't read. Sure, some of the formatting sometimes gets munged, but I can live with that. I don't work on a cube farm, so I am indeed in a position to insist on open formats. As far as I'm concerned, anyone who doesn't like that can just go jump on his head.

  3. Obligatory quote by asb · · Score: 5, Funny

    "Remember, when downloading free software, you're downloading communism."

    --
    Antti S. Brax - Old school - http://www.iki.fi/asb/
    1. Re:Obligatory quote by FiberOPtic · · Score: 1

      we live in communities

      --

    2. Re:Obligatory quote by ibbo · · Score: 1

      And if you daft enough to buy Windows your buying into capitalism.

      Which ones worse?

      At least mine costs me nothing and works to my satisfaction. The other well.....

      --
      Linux user #349545 (GNU/Linux)iD8DBQBAzWjX+MZAIjBWXGURAmflAKCntuBbuKC WenpmXoA7LNydllVQOwCfdjyzXscd
  4. Re:Boo by brpr · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Except that they're not actually banning the use of Microsoft software, just encouraging public institutions not to use it. That's not anything like forcing private citizens to use one or other bit of software.

    --
    Freedom is not increased by mere diminuation of government. Anarchy is freedom for the strong and slavery for the weak.
  5. Deja vu? by cribb · · Score: 1
    --
    Hostes alienigieni me abduxerunt. Qui annus est?
  6. FreeDOS for everyone! by BadAnalogyGuy · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    I installed Debian Etch a couple weeks back and was impressed with the progress it has made in installability. Good luck to Keralans with their Linux adventure!

  7. Re:Boo by taskforce · · Score: 1

    And Capitalist states never tell their citizens what products they can and can't use? When was the last time you saw MJ being legitimately sold?

    --
    My 3D Texturing Skinning work (under construction)
  8. Funny ass name by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I want M.A. Baby back, Baby back, Baby back, I want M.A. Baby back, Baby back, Baby back...

    1. Re:Funny ass name by kfg · · Score: 1

      "Naturally, being a democratic and progressive government, we want to encourage the spread of free software"

      Yeaaaaaaaaaah, Baby!

      KFG

  9. Monopoly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Doesn't every company want a monopoly?

    1. Re:Monopoly by Shaper_pmp · · Score: 1

      Yes, but not every company already has one. And not every company will deliberately, flagrantly and repeatedly break the law to acquire or maintain it.

      --
      Everything in moderation, including moderation itself
  10. REPOST by thedletterman · · Score: 1
    --
    Any fool can criticise, condemn, and complain, and most fools do. - Benjamin Franklin
  11. Re:Boo by belmolis · · Score: 5, Informative

    Kerala is ruled by an ELECTED communist government within an overall governmental framework that is not communist. Private enterprise is alive and well in Kerala. Kerala also has the highest literacy rate in India (95%) and a lot of technically skilled people.

  12. Dupe! ; link to newsforge article by solferino · · Score: 4, Informative
    1. This is a dupe.
    2. In the original slashdot story I posted a link to an article on newsforge which gives better background context to this decision by the Kerala government. The article has some flaws i.e. "open source guru Richard Stallman", but still makes interesting reading.
  13. Re:Boo by 1u3hr · · Score: 2, Informative

    Even non-communist states set policies for the software they buy. They're not stopping businesses from doing so.

  14. Re:Boo by Whiney+Mac+Fanboy · · Score: 5, Informative

    like the recent ridiculous coke and pepsi ban.

    You're kidding - coke & pepsi were found (by a private lab) to have contained a pesticide called malathion.

    Is it really communism to want pesticides out of foods?

    --
    There are shills on slashdot. Apparently, I'm one of them.
  15. Re:Boo by bky1701 · · Score: 1

    Oppression is bad only if you dislike what it stands for, I guess. I fail to see how asking people to use free software does anything negative. Except cost M$ some money. Look on the bright side, most of them were probably pirated copies.... less piracy by few users!

  16. Re:Boo by babbling · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The US is a fascist state - they like to tell people what they can and cannot do. That's nothing to be proud of.

  17. Re:Boo by BadAnalogyGuy · · Score: 2, Funny

    Jordan or Jackson?

  18. But wich distro by smithberry · · Score: 2, Funny

    I just hope they suggest a particular Linux distro and version to their schools, or they will end up with a dozen variants of Linux all needing different versions of downloaded apps, different config tools, and what not.

    I will stop short at suggesting which distro they should choose (and might just avoid being modded troll).

    1. Re:But wich distro by miffo.swe · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The differences between distros is mostly superficial. If you master one you master them all. The knowledge in Linux is highly reusable.

      I sure hope they try them all and uses what fits them the best.

      --
      HTTP/1.1 400
    2. Re:But wich distro by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're right, they should stay with the simple Win95, Win98, WinME, Win2k, XP home, XP pro
      setup.

    3. Re:But wich distro by MrCrassic · · Score: 1

      While that may be true, it is only true to an extent.

      For example, as you know, RPM managers are usually very different between distributions. Even though all that most people need to master downloading using a RPM source is simple command-line work, there's yum, apt2get, urpmi, and so forth.

      Also, correct me if I'm wrong (I'm still new to Linux), but you cannot just install a Debian-based install file of OpenOffice onto Mandriva Linux, or Fedora Core, or any other distribution that isn't Debian based.

      I think that if the government of Kerala were to mandate that IT departments test out all possible distributions in all possible situations, using Linux in general would be completely ineffective or worse than using Windows as a main OS, as cross-platform incompatibilities get increasingly harder to deal with as the environment gets larger

  19. Re:Boo by shreevatsa · · Score: 4, Insightful

    No, it's not a "communist state". It's a state in India (with the same constitution and political system as the rest) whose democratically elected coalition government is led by a party called the "Communist Party of India (Marxist)". Look it up (say here) if you like.
    The ban on Coca-Cola and Pepsi came after an NGO reported dangerously high levels of pesticide in them, although it is possible that there were other reasons.

  20. Finally! we can really complain about the commies! by fantomas · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Damn commies! damn slashdot for taking this long to give us some really commies to complain about!

    Actually I guess this is gonig to be fun watching people's head spin.. open source good, microsoft bad, but hang on, is communist open source good or bad? Actually Kerala is governed through a parliamentary system of representative democracy, they chose their current political leaders, no totalitarian dictators here. They just prefer communist representatives... Sounds like it's not all a bed of roses but it's in pretty good shape for an Indian state by the accounts I've come across (and a damn nice place to visit as a tourist according to several of my friends).

  21. Re:Boo by suv4x4 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    like the recent ridiculous coke and pepsi ban

    It's so much better when a nation has the right to be sick and obese.

    Rights are important. But when you get a heart attack at 35, priorities quickly change.

  22. Wait... by BungeBash · · Score: 0

    Isn't a communist country/nation calling someone out for trying to be a monopoly kinda...hypocritical?

    1. Re:Wait... by jandersen · · Score: 5, Insightful

      And isn't an allegedly democractic nation complaining about what another nation's population has democratically elected, kinda .... hypocritical? Or is it only 'real democracy' when people choose American style, braindead capitalism, even if the population has to be bound, gagged and drugged before they make the 'right' choice?

    2. Re:Wait... by Yvanhoe · · Score: 0

      The use of the term "communist state" is somehow misleading. India is a democracy and the communist party is a political party like any other. This is not a single-party system. And "communist" is a label covering a wide range of opinions, espiecially when used by americans. It can mean totalitarian, dictatorial, left-wing, socialist or open-source...

      --
      The Wise adapts himself to the world. The Fool adapts the world to himself. Therefore, all progress depends on the Fool.
    3. Re:Wait... by bky1701 · · Score: 0
      It can mean totalitarian, dictatorial, left-wing, socialist or open-source...
      Sadly all evil to most Americans, except for the first 2, that are ok as long as the Americans are in control....
    4. Re:Wait... by suv4x4 · · Score: 5, Funny

      And isn't an allegedly democractic nation complaining about what another nation's population has democratically elected, kinda .... hypocritical?

      What you're missing is, they're stupid and we're much smarter. In fact, everyone abroad is, I noticed, pathetically stupid. After scientific and military analysis, we found out this is due to lack of "smartness" in other countries, which results in truly utter stupidity.

      However we're not egotistical and we've devised a plan to bring our smartness in other countries against their will (since they are too stupid to request it themselves, it's a side effect). As you can assess, it's not about hypocricy at all. It's all about generosity and caring.

    5. Re:Wait... by init100 · · Score: 1

      And "communist" is a label covering a wide range of opinions, espiecially when used by americans. It can mean totalitarian, dictatorial, left-wing, socialist or open-source...

      Not to mention those pesky pirates.

    6. Re:Wait... by lixee · · Score: 1

      Some examples on the matter where military force was used: # Afghanistan, 1998, 2001, 2002, 2003 # Bosnia, 1994, 1995 # Cambodia, 1969-70 # China, 1945-46 # Congo (now Zaire), 1964 # Cuba, 1959-1961 ("Bay of Pigs" invasion) # El Salvador, 1980s # Grenada, 1983 # Guatemala, 1954, 1960, 1967-69 # Indonesia, 1958 # Iran, 1987 # Iraq, 1991-2000, 2003 (The U.S. government used radioactive bombs in the first war against Iraq. See United States War Crimes Against Iraq for what appears to be an accurate history.) # Korea and China, 1950-53 (Korean War) # Kuwait, 1991 # Laos, 1964-73 # Lebanon, 1983, 1984 (both Lebanese and Syrian targets) # Libya, 1986 # Nicaragua, 1980s # Panama, 1989. The U.S. government called it "Operation Just Cause". # Peru, 1965 # Somalia, 1993 # Sudan 1998. There are doubts that the pharmaceutical plant that was bombed was making weapons. # Vietnam, 1961-73 (An estimated 2,000,000 Vietnamese were killed.) Plus operation Ajax in Iran to overthrow Mossadegh. the clear animosity against Chavez, Morales, Obrador, Hamas, Hezbollah. Most of the above had a democratically elected that didn't wanna bend to the Americans, and that is exactlywhy they were elected.

      --
      Res publica non dominetur
    7. Re:Wait... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Real democracy" is a superficially democratic process in which governments friendly to the USA are "elected". When this fails supporting a dictatorship is prefereable than having a democratically elected government anti-washington. There are numerous examples throughout 20th century history

    8. Re:Wait... by mwa · · Score: 1

      Where's the "+1 Truthiness" mod?

    9. Re:Wait... by thej1nx · · Score: 1
      Please do not prove the american stereotype of being completely ignorant about the rest of the world and thus making idiotic uninformed statements.

      Since you are obviously someone with zero GK/IQ, India is a socialist-capitalistic democratic country over all. The place in question(Kerala) is a *state*! One where people have simply elected leaders with a communist philosophy. It doesn't automatically makes it a totalitarian dictatorship.

      ... which is more than what United states currently is incidentally, with a theoretically non-demoratically elected leader, who used a war to secure his legitimacy, and has eroded enough civil rights to make USA nearly no different from say, China. As such, a country with borderline braindead "democracy" questioning the will of the people of another democratic country electing their leaders through a democratic process, much much more hypocritical.

      One would think an american would at least know the difference between a state and a country.

    10. Re:Wait... by thej1nx · · Score: 1

      Indeed. USA's relations with Pakistan for past 3-4 decades have been a prime example of America being all for dictatorship and a totalitarian government.

  23. In communist Kerala... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    In communist Kerala... Linux installs you

    sorry, had to be done

    1. Re:In communist Kerala... by SashaMan · · Score: 1

      In communist Kerala... Linux installs you

      and it takes 2 days to complete the installation, at the end of which you cannot see or hear because there are no compatible drivers.

    2. Re:In communist Kerala... by b00fhead · · Score: 1

      You extend, embrace & extinguish Microsoft!

  24. So this is how communism ends... by jesterpilot · · Score: 1

    ...in being the only force defending the free market against monopolisation. Just like in Europe, with the software patents.

    --
    Trust me, I work for the government.
  25. It's the "Heartbreak Hotel" for MS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If he's successful, Microsoft will be singin' the blues: "Since M.A. Baby left me..."

  26. Re:Boo by rm999 · · Score: 0, Troll

    You and about 10 other people missed the point of my post. I don't care if they are elected, that has nothing to do with anything.

    Explain why they *banned* coke and pepsi... Most of the other indian states simply stopped serving it in their schools. Kerala banned it. They are anti-western business. They are communists.

  27. communist, baaaaad by XTbushwakko · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Why is it that if it's a communist state doing something it's bad and when it's not it's good. It's seems that the wording in the description highlights that it's a communist state that removes it, and not a democratic one. When the real point is that and Indian state is trying to remove it...

    1. Re:communist, baaaaad by bky1701 · · Score: 1

      Too bad we can't rate descriptions as flamebate... :(

    2. Re:communist, baaaaad by hey! · · Score: 1

      Why is it that if it's a communist state doing something it's bad and when it's not it's good.

      Easy. At least easier than parsing your question.

      If the question is "Why is it when a communist state does something it's bad when the exact same things, done by a non-communist state, is good?", at least.

      The answer is it's not about communism, it's about power. When a state which is firmly in the control of its citizens does something which increases its freedom and independence, that freedom and independence accrues to the people. When a state which exerts firm control over it's citizens does somethign which increases its freedom and independence, that is freedom and independence to maintain and extend its control over the people.

      So, what's good for a fascist, capitalist state is bad for the people. What's good for a democratic state which happens to be run by politicians with a communist ideology is good for the people. If you don't believe the latter scenario is possible, it does not invalidate the principle.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
  28. Re:Boo by rm999 · · Score: 1, Informative

    Actually, Coke and Pepsi showed that research to be flawed, and as I understand it linked it to the water. Kerala banned it because they are anti-corporation - especially from the West. Behavior like that is only keeping foreign investment out of India.

    It is communist to be anti-corporation, especially the way Kerala has done it.

  29. Re:Boo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You're kidding - coke & pepsi were found (by a private lab) to have contained a pesticide called malathion.

    For them both to have this pesticide seems a strange coincidence.

    I'd assume that the tests are correct, and that Coke and Pepsi don't share the same bottling plants. This means that the pesticide is probably present in the drinking water of the area due to contamination.

  30. Re:Boo by Dhalka226 · · Score: 1

    I know that DMCA-bashing and, lately, US-bashing are popular ways to get modded up, but this post is rather pathetic.

    If "they like to tell people what they can and cannot do" is your definition of a fascist state, I can not think of any state that is not fascist. Developing rules by which the residents of a country all agree to live is one of the fundamental purposes of government.

  31. No - it is not single-party communism by Noiser · · Score: 1

    It's true that usually so-called "Communist" governments are actually single-party dictatorships, but as strange as it sounds, the communist government of Kerala was actually democratically elected* and it can be removed at the next elections. Kerala is not USSR or North Korea.

    India is not a perfect democracy, but it wouldn't tolerate any of its states becoming an outright single-party dictatorship.

    (* It must be noted that this piece of knowledge comes from Wikipedia, so you don't have to trust it.)

    1. Re:No - it is not single-party communism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      20 posts and almost Godwin'd

    2. Re:No - it is not single-party communism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      so was George Bush

    3. Re:No - it is not single-party communism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      3 points.
      1. I am from Kerala. It is a democratically elected govt. Last time it was the congress govt. This time, it is the communist govt, who is at the helm. 3 elections back, it was again the commnst govt. Usually, the incumbent govt gets kicked out in the next election. This has been happening from 1957 onwards.

      2. Communist govt was at helm at 1957 in Kerala. They were the most idealological and most upright party, I guess, to have ruled any state of India, any time. Current communist govt are much much worse compared to the one at 1957, but even then the current one is quite Ok.
              The 1957 govt is one of the major reason for the phenomenon called the Kerala Phenomenon. They introduced such bills as LRO which caused them to be kicked out by the center. Along with it they lost the support of many a common people because many poor people became rich overnight, and once they became rich, their capitalistic tendencies came out. It is not that the govt did not know it wont happen. This was actively discussed, and even then they went ahead with this bill is amazing.

      3.I do not understand your point here...
      If India is not a perfect democracy, then what is ?
      Let me try to elaborate further.

      The country is poor. She is just coming up, but with a massive population and very less space, she has a very difficult (but not unmanageable) future.
      This then trickles down to people as
              a) People cannot be given very good amneties.
              b) Literacy rates are low
      Even then, India is amongst the most robust democratic nations, and the people there are very proud of it. Very, very proud of it.
      Last election, the incumbent govt went for appeasement of industries and with the money that they garnered launched the biggest election campaign, which projected very rosy pictures with high growth etc.
      Every expert predicted a hands down win for the govt. The campaign was that glitzy.

      What happened in the election was the govt was kicked out, by a VERY HIGH margin, since at the grass root level there was actually a decrease of quality of life. This was there, in the stats, but it was glazed over with the high growth in the higher echleons of the society.
      The new govt, so handles both - they try to bring up the poor too along with the high-and-mighty. And one of the major forces forcing them to do it is the communist party of India, elected majorly from Kerala and West Bengal.

      Sometimes parties try to please people too much, at the expense of govt. But that also doesnt work too well here. See, people are very very politically aware. And when people are politically aware, these things also doesnt get the desired effect, since the opposition party can easily tell the people what is happening.

      That, Sir, I say - is democracy.
      There will be some sort of cheating etc going on, but when there are poor and illiterate people it has to be expected.
      Anyways the election commision is strong and the elections are, on an average, very well done.

  32. Re:Boo by bky1701 · · Score: 1
    Actually, Coke and Pepsi showed that research to be flawed
    First place you go when you hear something bad about a company - the company. Hmmm....
  33. Re:Boo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > Explain why they *banned* coke and pepsi...

    Because it is bad for you ?

  34. Re:Boo by belmolis · · Score: 3, Insightful

    And you've missed the point. It isn't just that they are elected, it is also that the overall framework is not communist, so even a government dominated by communists cannot impose a truly communist state. Private property and private enterprise exist in Kerala, which they would not in a communist system, and the state government does not control the economy the way it would in a communist system.

    Even if the reason for the ban on Coke and Pepsi is hostility to large, multinational corporations, that doesn't make Kerala communist. There are lots of Greens, for example, who are certainly not communist, who are hostile to such corporations. There are also other possible reasons for the ban. One is that if they think that the levels of toxic chemicals in Coke and Pepsi products are too high, it makes sense to ban sales entirely, not just in schools. Even if adults aren't at risk (and they may think they are), kids drink soft drinks outside of school.

  35. Re:Boo by rm999 · · Score: 0, Troll

    A. That makes it a communist state. It is a state, run by communists. Are we really going to argue over the wording of all this? Even the article summary calls them communist.
    B. Coke and Pepsi have shown the original pesticide study to be flawed (this is not surprising, because it was run by an interest group that has repeatedly shown itself to have an anti-west slant). Indians have a tendency to be VERY anti-west (I know this I am Indian), and my main point was this anti-microsoft action is an example of that. Kerala is especially bad at this, and this can directly be linked to the communist thing. It is sad, it is keeping foreign investment out of India. China, a communist country, has been more west-friendly than the world largest "democracy."

    I am tired of the moderation system on slashdot. My original post had some valid points, but I am a "troll" because I dared disagree with an anti-microsoft action. I was then inundated with 10 less-than-insightful comments that all said the same basic thing, either missed my point or the point in general, and then half those posts were modded up... Whatever.

  36. Re:Boo by MainframeKiller · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Kerala is ruled by an ELECTED communist government within an overall governmental framework that is not communist.

    Why call it communism when it is clearly social-democracy?


    --
    http://www.club977.com/ - The 80's Channel!
    Your source for commercial free 80's music!
  37. Re:Boo by nagora · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Kerala banned it. They are anti-western business. They are communists.

    So what? Who cares? If they're real communists then that's probably good (but hopelessly idealistic, like real capitalists). If they're just Stalinists then that's bad. But banning a couple of products because of a health scare doesn't seem particularly tyrannical to me.

    --
    "Encyclopedia" is to "Wikipedia" what "Library" is to "Some people at a bus stop"
  38. Re:Boo by rsidd · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Explain why they *banned* coke and pepsi...

    Uh, because they contain harmful and dangerous pesticides?

    Now explain why the democratic, free-market US not only bans marijuana (which has never been shown to be harmful or addictive), but even bans forms of hemp that do not contain the hallucinogenic substance (THC) in marijuana.

  39. Re:Boo by TapeCutter · · Score: 1

    "Kerala is a communist state - they like to tell their citizens what products they can and cannot use"

    Are you suggesting the drug war is over and the bong heads won, or did you forget about prohibition?

    In true /. form I have not read TFA, but from the summary it sounds like they are doing what many of us would like to see ANY government do. Also from the summary they have not banned anything, so what is the problem besides the words "communist state"?

    I hope the rest of /. does not judge this idea soley on the politics of it's implementer. I don't see why any taxpayer should automatically hand over millions for MS licenses when the alternative is both transparent and "free".

    Disclaimer: I'm not a "Linux fan boy", nor am I a communist, I have been paid to develop "stuff" in windows for 15+yrs and think MSVC is the best C/C++ development platform bar none.

    --
    And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
  40. CAD Tools by xander_zone_xxx · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    But what about the CAD tools for electronics(etc) if the dump M$ out? Are there any comprehensive and easy to use tools in Linux ?

    1. Re:CAD Tools by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://www.cadsoft.de/Cadsoft Eagle

      http://www.lis.inpg.fr/realise_au_lis/kicad/Kicad

      If you look for it, you can find it, and if you can't find it, I'm sure you can use the money you don't use on microsoft licenses to make your own program that does it.
    2. Re:CAD Tools by roboguy · · Score: 1

      Bit OT but check this out too http://www.geda.seul.org.

    3. Re:CAD Tools by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What, you don't use VI for CAD design?

  41. Re:Boo by boater+rich · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Coke and Pepsi in the US and WEST won't contain the pesticides. The issue was the use of pesticide contaminated water in the LOCAL manufacturing plants... hence the ban. Rich

  42. Re:Finally! we can really complain about the commi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Of course, everybody ignores the fact that these communist were busy running MS. IOW, they are no different than anybody else, except now, they appear to want to run a balanced budget and look to the future. I wish that some of the west's politicians would start considering budgets and futures.

  43. Re:Boo by babbling · · Score: 1

    I was trying to word the post along the lines of the top-level post to point out how ridiculous it is to say "Kerala is a communist state - they like to tell their citizens what products they can and cannot use".

  44. Re:Boo by belmolis · · Score: 1

    No, the reason you are being modded down is probably that you don't know what a communist state is. What the rest of us mean is a state that operates under a communist political and economic system. That means state ownership of all property, state control of the economy, and dictatorship of the proletariat. That is very different from the situation in Kerala where at both the state and national level the overal economic and political system is non-communist. The fact that Kerala is controlled by a coalition whose leading party is the Communist Party does not give Kerala a communist economy or political system.

    If you want to complain about the policies of the Communist-led government Kerala, feel free, but don't confuse the system in Kerala with communism, and don't complain when the rest of us are not impressed with your confusion.

  45. Re:Boo by Bert64 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    What gives MS the right to maintain market share and consequently leech money out of india.
    It makes absoloutely no sense for the indian government to use software sold by a foreign corporation when a local company can provide and support an open source based solution. Any profit that local company makes, will ultimately be taxed by the government, as will their staff, so a chunk of the money the government spends comes right back to them. Plus it helps keep jobs locally, and any improvements they make can also be used by other government departments without additional cost to them.
    It makes absoloutely no sense for the indian government to keep giving huge amounts of money to a foreign corporation, when there's a local alternative. Infact, not using the local alternative is pretty irresponsible and harmfull to the local economy.

    --
    http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
  46. Re:Boo by rm999 · · Score: 1

    It matters a lot. It matters because of the reasons why they banned it. It matters because the outside world sees the way they treat foreign investment, and treats them accordingly. It matters to me because as an Indian I don't see my country becoming more wealthy because of the anti-west ideals emanating it.

    And banning microsoft was not a health scare. In fact, I don't think banning Coke was either (that is debatable).

  47. Re:Boo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Coke and Pepsi were banned because the an NGO showed that it had unacceptable level of pesticides in it.
    This has been disputed by Coke and Pepsi.

    There is also another ongoing fight in Kerala against a Coke bottling plant which was accused of contaminating the ground water.

    The ruling party is leftist, and contains some anti-Globalisation and anti-MNC "intellectuals", but the ban was certainly due to pesticide levels.

  48. Re:Boo by Russellkhan · · Score: 2, Funny
    Explain why they *banned* coke and pepsi...


    Because they're filhy communists who hate business and don't think pesticides belong in drinks.
    --
    Information doesn't want to be anthropomorphized anymore.
  49. Re:Boo by rm999 · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    So many things wrong wiht your post (and I'm pretty sure your reasons have nothing to do with why I was modded down).

    People call China communist, but under your definition it is not. People call the US a democracy but it is not. Communism does not have to be under a dictatorship. Please don't tell me you were a polisci major.

    "The fact that Kerala is controlled by a coalition whose leading party is the Communist Party does not give Kerala a communist economy or political system."

    I called them communist because they are run by the communist party. That is all. Even the article summary called them communist. It is pretty accepted to call Kerala communist.

  50. Linux initiative was taken by earlier governement by xander_zone_xxx · · Score: 1

    and the earlier party to rule was Congress, a non commie one. They just did not implement it... "The Left Democratic Front government targets implementing an earlier government order that was issued during the previous United Democratic Front regime. The decision was taken in 2004 to push open source systems, but this was not actively followed. Initially, schools were given the option to choose whether teachers were to be trained in Linux systems or Microsoft. The option has now narrowed down to migration." Quoted from the article.. http://www.financialexpress.com/fe_full_story.php? content_id=138464

  51. Re:Boo by rm999 · · Score: 1

    "Are you suggesting the drug war is over and the bong heads won, or did you forget about prohibition? "
    I am not a defender of the USA, so this argument is irrelvant.

    "but from the summary it sounds like they are doing what many of us would like to see ANY government do. Also from the summary they have not banned anything, so what is the problem besides the words "communist state"?

    Perhaps, but my main argument was against their reasons not their actions (which I also think are somewhat questionable). Recently, they did ban coke and pepsi. As in entirely banned, not just from the government. They did this largely becuase of their communist, anti-corporation ideals. These are the wrong reasons to do anything.

    "I don't see why any taxpayer should automatically hand over millions for MS licenses when the alternative is both transparent and "free". "

    Agreed. I don't think anything is automatic, and as a skilled developer, I am sure you know decisions like this are not trivial. I think this one was made somewhat trivially.

  52. $25 Windows by kripkenstein · · Score: 1

    Yes, this is a dupe. Still, there was a bit of new and interesting information:

    In a written statement, Microsoft's public sector head in India, Rohit Kumar, said the company had tried to keep its prices low to make them accessible to schools, selling one version of Windows for between $25 and $30 per computer.

    This would be the 'crippled' version, I presume. Still, it does show how afraid Microsoft are of Linux adoption. Of course, they could do a great job of defending their monopoly by just giving away a 'crippled' version of windows for free (as in beer). I predict that they will eventually do this; in fact, they already are, in a sense: allowing people to run known pirated copies of Windows - which is exactly what WGA does - is to, in effect, give Windows away for free.

  53. Important to note.. by Dr.+Donuts · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Yes, it's very important to make sure that we throw in the word "communist" because that puts the whole article in perspective. Just saying "the Indian state of Kerala" would have horribly skewered the story.

    Pretty blatant attempt at negative association. It's so fucking obvious, it's embarrasing.

    1. Re:Important to note.. by Devil_Hack · · Score: 1

      I got to agree with you here. Seriously, what exactly is so important about the fact that it's a democratically elected communism-inclined governement that decided doing this?

    2. Re:Important to note.. by Marcus+Green · · Score: 1

      Democratically elected implies it has a mandate from the electorate for its policies.

    3. Re:Important to note.. by Devil_Hack · · Score: 1

      Ok, I should have been more clear and should have made "communism-inclined" bold. My point was that it's completely unimportant to the story that this governement is comumnism-inclined, it's been democratically elected, so it shouldn't matter. I don't see the point in it being mentioned in the article except for the fact to make the Karala governement look "evil" in some people's eyes. If it hadn't been mentioned in the article, people would think about the decision. Now some people will try to come up with some explanation of why this is bad because it's a communism-inclined governement, which is of course completely retarted. (Note that I'm not saying if I think their decision is good or bad, that's not the point here.)

    4. Re:Important to note.. by dangitman · · Score: 1
      Ok, I should have been more clear and should have made "communism-inclined" bold. My point was that it's completely unimportant to the story that this governement is comumnism-inclined, it's been democratically elected, so it shouldn't matter.

      Even if they weren't democratically elected, why would it matter? It doesn't change the fact that yet another government is choosing open source. It would be rather fucked up if the news were only allowed to report on the activities of democratically elected governments.

      --
      ... and then they built the supercollider.
  54. Well that explains it by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 1

    This must just a giant communist trap made by the NSA to find and locate all those damn pinko's. Makes sense. I bet they got a back door coded in the software to phone home about what you do with it. Damn you opensource. Now if only we could get the code to make sure it does what it says. But that will never happen.

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

    1. Re:Well that explains it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In soviet russia, free software downloads you!

  55. M. A. Baby by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Go baby go.

  56. Re:Boo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes, people should have the right to make wrong choices.

  57. Re:Boo by Marcion · · Score: 5, Insightful

    From TFA, "The news will further unsettle foreign investors in this state."

    Interpretation, spin!

    Here is a more balanced and fact-based treatment : http://www.financialexpress.com/latest_full_story. php?content_id=138497

    The New York times seems to be trying to stir up "Fear, Anxiety and doubt". The government is not "Communist" but democratic socialist, like the UK's ruling party and much of the EU, Latin America and many other places.

    In Kerala, they are replacing one western Operating System (illegal copies of Windows), with another western operating system (legal licences of Linux). After Microsoft went there and demanded lots of money for no source code and no local language support from their dialect, and Richard Stallman went there and offered full source code and a free system that had already been translated into their local dialect.

    Why this should panic investors? Cola is after all very bad for you, why should Indians have to become clones of us fat, sugar-high westerners?

    Kerala has done very well without help from the western elites and will carry on doing so. FUD or no FUD.

  58. Not exactly a dupe... by alexhs · · Score: 1

    The real piece of news is that it's a "communist state" that did it. Therefore it belongs in the "politics" section AND it's way better for good flamefests and revenue-generating ads ! Currently it's night in the U.S. (where people have been taught to loathe communism since the cold war), but wait for America waking up and you will see ;)

    --
    I have discovered a truly marvelous proof of killer sig, which this margin is too narrow to contain.
    1. Re:Not exactly a dupe... by gramji · · Score: 1

      I sort of agree with you but I do have reservations about Kerala being called a purely communist state. This communist government was elected into power and knowing Indian politics this situation goes back and forth - commie now and different democratic-commie later . the biggest downfall of having a commie govt is the labor force. the labor force - organized and unorganized alike - are nearly impossible to deal with. very difficult to get work done with them. my wife and her parents are from Kerala and I get to hear of the continuous labor problems almost daily. but surprisingly Kerala also is the only state in India that can claim 100% literacy (though it is suspect as to what "literacy" means in that case). So I don;t know if we can compare communism in the former USSR to communism in Kerala(India).

      --
      Open Source and Computer-aided Design (http://ossandcad.blogspot.com)
  59. all for the sake of education by revolu7ion · · Score: 1

    Lets encourage all schools to not teach with Microsoft products... THat way, when you graduate - you won't be prepared for the workforce, where most companies do use microsoft. They are selling their kids futures for a politically motivated stunt! (all they really want is 5 minutes of slashdot fame)

    --
    Jesus Saves
    1. Re:all for the sake of education by ajs318 · · Score: 1

      Bollocks.

      You are talking out of your arse.

      You do realise, don't you, that you just insulted the intelligence of everyone who knows more than one means to accomplish a given end? Absit omen someone should learn that the end is independent of the means. For crying out loud, they might even realise that that is the right place to stick an abstraction layer, not just where it looks pretty!

      You seem to have a very narrow view -- certainly no broader than Microsoft's paid shills -- if you really think that learning to use one software product precludes you from using anything else. Well, even Microsoft Office isn't consistent from one version to another -- default behaviours change subtly with each successive release. But that's obviously fine as far as you're concerned.

      In the absolute worst case, the companies will simply have to switch to the Open Source alternatives that their new employees already know and love. It's not like it's going to cost them anything. Now, when they do switch, and find out that they could have been saving money all along, then things are going to get very interesting .....

      --
      Je fume. Tu fumes. Nous fûmes!
    2. Re:all for the sake of education by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most companies use Microsoft because their staff are not educated in computing. IMHO, only amateurs use Microsoft software.

    3. Re:all for the sake of education by aadvancedGIR · · Score: 1

      Yeah, sure...

      I work in corporate environment and the situation is easy. Whenever I need a SW tool for which it exists an open soure alternative, I have two options:
      -Spend one hour filling paperwork to justify my need of the tool so that it could be rejected 3 weeks later by a beancounter.
      -Spend 5 min downloading a relatively equivalent open source SW and then learn to use it on the fly.
      Guess which one I try first.

      No matter if it is proprietary or open SW, when you have left school and are working, you can't just say you only know how to use one particular program. You either adapt to what is available or needed for your project or you die. Regulary using OSS can't hurt anyone.

    4. Re:all for the sake of education by 1u3hr · · Score: 1
      THat way, when you graduate - you won't be prepared for the workforce, where most companies do use microsoft.

      Bullshit. In most companies, most staff type text into MS Word. No different from typing text into any other word processor. I've used at least 20 in my time, including ten different versions of MS Word (Word Mac 4, 5, 6, 98; Word DOS 5, 6, Word Win 2, 95, 97, 2k). And Linux Office apps slavishly copy MS's interface, you can hardly tell the difference.

    5. Re:all for the sake of education by Shaper_pmp · · Score: 1

      when you graduate - you won't be prepared for the workforce, where most companies do use microsoft.

      This is a stupid comment for three reasons:

      1. The government is trying to break the vendor lockin associated with Microsoft products.

      They can do this by trying to convince everyone who's already trained on Microsoft software to switch to Linux (with all the re-learning, headaches and user-rejection that causes), or they can take the sensible, long-game approach and instead simply train the next generation of techies to use alternative systems.

      Unless you missed the whole aim of the exercise, your point is therefore irrelevant.

      2. The whole point is to transition the region to primarily (or at least mixed-) Linux platforms. Given this, by the time the kids are grown up and of working age, there should be a large percentage (majority?) of Linux-based companies for them to work for.

      In particular, if the average wage of an MCSE suddenly shoots through the roof, even more places will be tempted to transition to Linux for the cheaper recruitment costs and wages associated with it.

      3. Learning Linux systems doesn't prohibit you from learning Microsoft systems any more than learning Microsoft systems prohibits you from learning Linux. In fact, often in my experience learning the OSS way of doing things actually helps in the long term.

      Point 3 might need some clarification:

      Speaking in broad generalities here, the (geek-created) abstractions OSS software present to the user is more "techie", in the sense of being harder to learn, but crucially is also more attuned to what the machine/OS is actually doing "under the hood". Although you're still picking up an abstraction, it's often more or less a simplified version of The Truth. If you ever need to (or just want to) get under the hood and really learn what's going on, you're instantly half-way there.

      In addition, even while using the abstraction, understanding some principles of the underlying mechanism means you can use the abstraction better or more efficiently (eg, understanding the basic steps required to make a database query makes it obvious why these are often the most-important-to-optimise features of a web app).

      In contrast, whenever Microsoft present abstractions to the user the way the abstractions are designed is very... quirky. They may be easier to learn, but often MS seems to select an abstraction based on how easy it is to pick up, not on whether it's the best abstraction for the job or whether it bears any relation to the underlying architecture at all.

      This is lovely if all you want is an easy abstraction, but only works if the abstraction is perfect. If you ever need (or just want) to get under the hood and really get to grips with what's going on, the first stage is to unlearn everything you've already learned, and then learn from scratch what's actually happening.

      Since all abstractions leak implementation details through to some degree, this is a false economy - in my experience even non-technical users using MS products frequently encounter situations which could be avoided or fixed with just a little understanding of the basic principles they're using.

      (Referring you to Palmer's Law of Software Abstraction: If all users see is a shiny bonnet, they won't understand why the shift pedal is important to driving.)

      This tendancy is pronounced right throughout Microsoft's product line - BASIC/VB started off with a terrible abstraction for programming, and has only gained credibility by slowly evolving to a point it's essentially identical to C++/C#/Java.

      ASP.NET attempts to bring drag-and-drop programming to the web, by imposing a stateful "desktop app" metaphor onto a stateless "distributed app" medium. Sure, it's easy to pick up if you're a desktop app programmer who wants to produce simple web apps, but if you don't already appreciate the differenc

      --
      Everything in moderation, including moderation itself
    6. Re:all for the sake of education by revolu7ion · · Score: 1

      I am not referring to tech positions: Most of them will figure anything out given time and an abundance of Jolt Cola... I am talking about little Susan - who has aspirations to travel, doesn't know much about computers except for basic office duties, or little Johnny - who needs to know how to run a small business. in case one: Job requirements will be: "must be famillliar with Excel, Word, Windows OS" I know if my fiance used linux... she would be lost. It's just not giving these kids the best chance... i still think it's not a good idea.

      --
      Jesus Saves
    7. Re:all for the sake of education by Shaper_pmp · · Score: 1

      Fair point, but from little Susan's (or more likely, little Sandeep's ;-) position, how different it OO.org Writer to MS Word to AbiWord? How different in basic functionality is OO.org Calc to MS Excel?

      How different are the concepts of desktop/folders/files/searches/windows between Linux and Windows?

      It'll look a bit different and a few options will have moved, but unless you're a Word power-user you really won't notice the difference between (say) OO.org and MS Office.

      Little Johnny would likewise be fine - if he wants to run a small business he'll already know Linux/OO.org/whatever, allowing him to set up the software infrastructure of his business essentially for free, instead of having to pay hundreds or thousands of dollars up-front in licence fees.

      You're basically arguing that the difference between Word and OO.org is enough that they should perpetuate vendor lockin for another whole generation. Their whole position is to avoid vendor lockin, so your argument doesn't really make sense in the context of their stated aims.

      --
      Everything in moderation, including moderation itself
  60. Re:Boo by suv4x4 · · Score: 1

    Yes, people should have the right to make wrong choices.

    What if they are lured and enticed to make those wrong choices?

    It's one thing for coke to be sold and it has in big letters "don't drink a bottle of this every day or kiss your health goodbye" like is done (more or less) with cigarrettes.

    It's another if you're constantly flooded with ads that represent pepsi as the equivalent "of being cool".

    Plus I somehow doubt your own country allows you to make the wrong choice of snorting heroin.

  61. I hope they do not by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 1
    Learning how to deal with computers is essential nowadays yet what most people learn is how to work with Windows. This is like learning how do drive a FIAT Pinto vs learning to drive a car. Granted in with cars the difference is minimal but still we get a driving license. Not a fiat pinto license.

    I just seen to many windows kids loose it completly when they are put to work with a non-windows computer. Or even DOS. Or an older windows version. Or indeed any computer that is not a 100% copy of their home system.

    Wich would you consider the best tech class. One that has a dozen different model and brands of say welders or a class that has just a dozen of 1 model by 1 supplier. I know wich class will produce the better welder.

    I actually had a guy complain that our forklift's work differently then the one he was trained on and he couldn't work with it. The problem was that the button to choose direction was on the joystick NOT a handle underneath the steering wheel. Our small one has two seperate pedals for doing back and forth. Wich you need to know because if you don;t and you think you are slamming on the brake you can be in for a suprise. Not as much as the person walking behind the forklift but still.

    I seen to many kids come into the workforce trained on standarized equipment and me having to spent then a lot of time retraining them to get used to workplaces were not only is the equipment different but often where every single piece of equipment is off a different model. I for one have rarely seen a company with more then 1 forklift of the same model.

    Teach kids how to deal with computers, not how to work with OS X (no not the apple one) version Y, configuration Z. The latter group will have great scores but fail in the workplace.

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

    1. Re:I hope they do not by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      I just seen to many windows kids loose it completly when they are put to work with a non-windows computer. Or even DOS. Or an older windows version. Or indeed any computer that is not a 100% copy of their home system.

      Those people will 'lose it' if the desktop is switched from KDE to Gnome (or FVWM, yay FVWM! or mwm or even twm, yay twm!) too. You don't describe a Free/not-Free software scenario. Though a monoculture of only $LATEST_VERSION_WINDOZ does promote such a scenario.

  62. Re:Boo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Yes. Kerala particularly (and sadly) has a problem with over-education of the population compared to the number of skilled jobs. Their education system is exceptional, but often people can't find relevant employment afterwards.

    I met a fisherman on the Keralan coastline, fishing with the villagers using a technique 1000s of years old. He had a degree and masters in informatics, could develop in Java and others, and spoke four languages. OSS is an amazing solution here. The government can soak up some of the highly skilled people and kick start an industry, rather than just hand all their cash overseas. In the western world, time is expensive, so it is often preferable to buy in software rather than put in development effort. In india, the dividing line is moved much further across. Skilled labour is comparatively much cheaper, so a wider range of tasks are suitable to be done in house.

  63. Re:Boo by suv4x4 · · Score: 1

    Private enterprise is alive and well in Kerala. Kerala also has the highest literacy rate in India (95%) and a lot of technically skilled people.

    Oh, that's it buddy!
    We'll be jumping in our Stealths and "freeing" every single citizen of Kerala starting tommorow!

    And remembers kids: literacy is good, but in moderation.

  64. Re:Boo by ArwynH · · Score: 1
    Why call it communism when it is clearly social-democracy?

    Because calling themselves 'communist' generates more publicity? Just look at the number of extra posts under this topic that are due to the word 'communist' being in the description. :)

  65. Re:Boo by Tim+C · · Score: 2, Insightful

    which has never been shown to be harmful or addictive

    On the contrary, there have been a good many studies that have shown just that; the problem is that there have also been a lot of studies that have shown the opposite. About the best you can say is that the jury is still out on the matter.

  66. Hyperbole by Colin+Smith · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If you understand the general principles, how difficult is it to pick up MS, or Apple products? I haven't used MS Office for decades but I could sit down and be productive with it in about 30 seconds flat. The same is true of an MS Office user sitting down in front of OpenOffice or AbiWord. Most software which performs a similar task actually tends to use similar concepts, look and work in a similar manner.

    --
    Deleted
    1. Re:Hyperbole by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1
      I haven't used MS Office for decades but I could sit down and be productive with it in about 30 seconds flat

      So could I but after two decades of working in good plain text editors the feel of Word drives me up the wall. I think its the little delays built into the UI, and the strange approach to selection.

      We need to dull down our kids expectations of UI quality to keep them employable.

      Of course in India none of that matters. Business and Government could deploy hundreds of millions of Linux desktop systems on the basis that it is cheaper and better and then it will be the norm.

  67. Re:Boo by Ekimus · · Score: 2, Interesting

    And exactly why is being a communist bad?

    It is just another idea that tries to create a perfect world.

    Aside from that it is not a good idea to ban any product. This will just lead faster to more idiots.

    About being anti-western, in my point of view being anti-western is actually a good thing although I do live in a western country, but when I look at what the western world does to the non-western countries it seems to me we are way off track by trying to

    a) tell other people what's good and what's not good (tell as in force them to...)
    b) not trying to understand that there are other cultures that simply don't work in the same way

    --
    You are not free to read this message, by doing so, you have violated my licence and are required to urinate publicly. T
  68. the communist government in the Indian state of... by l3v1 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    the communist government in the Indian state of Kerala

    In fact, this decision has nothing to do with the specific government being communist or not, and I welcome this decision, although I have nothing to do with India whatsoever. But, as wonderful western objective journalism rules expect, how nice it is to insert that word in there so as to inflate a latent (or not) hostility right in the beginning towards whatever might come in the following text. Instead of just saying Kerala's state government decided to encourage this and that. These days, I've just become really sensitive to slight (or not so slight) political overtones.
     

    --
    I am putting myself to the fullest possible use, which is all I can think that any conscious entity can ever hope to do.
  69. Re:Boo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't like colas, but I respect the right of others to drink. It's Your health and You can do whatever you want with it. Actually I detect racist overtones here "dirty savages can't make the choice themeselves", while if say Utah was to institute such a ban, everyone would be expressing outrage over that someone is going around deciding what's good for us.

    BTW ironically the Soviets always rabidly hated coca cola

  70. Kerala has also banned Coke & Pepsi by Frankie70 · · Score: 1

    Why is it that if it's a communist state doing something it's bad and when it's not it's good.

    Kerala has also banned Coke & Pepsi.

    And they didn't ban other Indian drinks which had the same problems.

  71. Re:Boo by The+Cydonian · · Score: 1

    The irony, in that particular case, was that the market was already sorting it out: per capita consumption of soft-drinks in India have been among the lowest in the world.

    Now, it's a fair question to ask how all that near-ubiquitous cricket advertising (which, as many will tell you, is the real growth industry in India) will change, now that Pepsi and Coke are being hounded out, but something tells me that BCCI officials aren't about to lose their sleep over this.

  72. Re:Boo by Javaman59 · · Score: 1

    I'd rather be killed by a nice boy like you, than an islamo-fascist any day.

    And remember, freedom is good, unless you exercise it.

    --
    I'm a software visionary. I don't code.
  73. God's own Country wants Linux! by cowbud · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Well I guess there is nothing more to say there, Microsoft is officially seen by India as Satan's hell spawn. When God's Own Country chooses the people follow!

    http://www.gods-own-country.info/

    1. Re:God's own Country wants Linux! by fantababy · · Score: 0

      whoever it is communist or not as for as embracing open source it is good!

  74. Re:Boo by Whiney+Mac+Fanboy · · Score: 4, Insightful

    About the best you can say is that the jury is still out on the matter.

    Perhaps, but in that case why the fuck is non-thc-rich HEMP illegal? It doesn't have any health issues.

    --
    There are shills on slashdot. Apparently, I'm one of them.
  75. Re:Boo by suv4x4 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I'd rather be killed by a nice boy like you, than an islamo-fascist any day.

    That's how we differ. I'd rather not be killed at all.

  76. Re:Boo by Javaman59 · · Score: 1

    Thanks. Excellent info and insight. As someone who, in general, favours MS in these arguments, I can see the MS vs FOSS economic balance changing in a place like Keralan, as you've explained so succintly.

    --
    I'm a software visionary. I don't code.
  77. Re:Boo by nagora · · Score: 5, Insightful
    And banning microsoft was not a health scare.

    Well, they didn't ban Microsoft, and if they did they'd only be making a prudent decision anyway. Microsoft has held back computing in the West for 20 years; why let it hold India back too? Plus, of course, Microsoft embody the anti-capitalist bogyman far better than some communist local government. Capitalism only works when government intervenes to prevent monopolies growing to the point where they can control the market. Once that point is reached capitalism breaks down, which is what all western companies want. The perfect situation for a western company is to have no competition and customers who have to pay whatever you tell them to. Enron in California is the ultimate example of the perfect western company from the point of view of the owners.

    Microsoft would dearly like to be in the same situation as Enron was before it got busted; does your desire to sell your country to the West really go so far as to want that?

    I think you have a very distorted view of exactly how business in the West works and, more importantly, how western businesses view your country. You are a market to be milked, nothing more. The companies involved will happily collude to screw you and your countrymen to the wall. If it means a few Bhopals or the total loss of control of the power generation system, or the sale of all your fresh water to factories resulting in famine in rual areas, then they care not a jot.

    I know this because I live in the west and they have done these things here. Now most of them are illegal, so they are off to suck you dry before you get wise. A few million dollars in bribes to officials can save them billions off their bottom line, so they will do it. Once they own the government, you'll be praying for communists or anyone else to do something about it. Come to Britain and see what it's like to have a government totally controlled by big business. Fraud and corruption are rife while education, health, housing, and employment are collapsing around us and the electorate can do nothing about it because of the gerrymandering that keeps a party with a third of the vote in absolute power with a vast majority in parliament.

    Or go to America, where the entire cabinet is made up of unelected oil company directors. Literally tens of thousands of people have died, and more die every day, because these represetatives of western business that you are so worried about upsetting are pursuing their business agendas using tanks and missiles. They are also supporting Pakistan's development of WMD which may one day be used on you. They are doing these things not because they hate you but because it makes them money. Lots of money. Nothing else matters.

    As for you, to them you are just cheap labour. By undermining the employment market in their home countries, western businesses can use you to increase the gap in wages between the people who produce their products and the massive salaries they award themselves. As long as you depend on the West to build your economy instead of using your own resources you will never be anything more than a well-dressed slave.

    India has natural resources, plenty of people, and a tradition of education and technical skill that a country like America can only dream of. What the hell do you need us for? Get yourself some self-respect and make your own software, your own computers, your own soft drinks; your own future.

    --
    "Encyclopedia" is to "Wikipedia" what "Library" is to "Some people at a bus stop"
  78. Re:Boo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    According to a man I saw kill a store clerk in a robbery yesterday, he didn't in fact kill a store clerk or rob said store yesterday.

    Hey, good enough for me!

  79. Re:Boo by Gli7ch · · Score: 0, Troll

    Indeed.

    What's the difference between being told to do something as government policy as opposed to having consent engineered by the liberal media? At least elected officials make the calls instead of someone like Murdoch telling us what we think because he has more money.

  80. This just proves it.... by kjart · · Score: 4, Funny

    Anyone against Microsoft must be a communist.

  81. Re:Boo by Stormscape · · Score: 1

    You know suv4x4, you raise a valid point. Everytime there's a country/region that's doing better than the United States, they either A) get the shit bombed out of them B) get a sudden government change or C) get angry letters mailed to them For Cuba the US tried B but it failed. So they just do C now. For North Korea US does C For Iraq US did A and B For Vietnam US just did A and C.

  82. Re:Boo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You sound like someone with a communist chip on their shoulder.

    Simply understand this idiot. It is not a communist state. It has a Marxist party at the head of an elected body of representatives, in much the same way as the government of the UK has (in principle) an elected left-wing party at the helm of government. This is very different from the 'communist bogeyman' you seem to believe in.

    Secondly - you listening now? - Stallman offers them an open source solution, customisable to their needs, that comes 'out of the box' with native language support etc, and its effectively free. Microsoft offer then jack-s for a high price, and they wont be able to use all those awesome IT grads they produce (i work with some, they get western jobs because they are the dogs nuts at what they do and are prepared to work 12 hours a day for 7 hours pay) to customise it as they require. What would you choose as a developing nation? Also note, they have not banned Microsoft products, and they are not forcing people to go open source, the government has merely suggested that educational facilites, that would be better spending money on more learning tools for the kids, use the superior and less expensive solution that open source will provide.

    Thirdly - i know all this makes your head hurt but keep going, we'll get there! - Your rational suggests that the goverments of Europe and the USA are communist too. You sit there and say "Gosh darnit maa, why did they ban coke, just cause its poisonous, thats so protective and communist of them...." whilst uncle Sam sits on some of the most restrictive trade tariffs in existance. China and India would export a HELL of a lot more to the West if we didnt legislate to prevent them, whilst banging on about them being resistant to outside investment. If we can tax the hell out of Chinese steel and Indian tech goods, why cant an INDIAN company produce soft-drinks if the INDIAN people want them.

    All you mean by "the mean communists hate western trade:(" is "WAAAAAHHHHH, the mean reds have stopped giving us lots of money, shame on them! Thats so undemocratic, not wanting to give your abuser preferentia trade!"

    Find all the small flaws, exagerations and typos - go ahead, it doesnt make you any less wrong.

  83. Re:Boo by TapeCutter · · Score: 1

    "Now can we please stop arguing this off topic shit? If you don't want to actually discuss something relevant don't bother replying."

    Yes, focus on the idea instead of the politics.

    However your idiotic troll started the thread and introduced coke, pepsi and political bias. Now you want to back out because you realize you know jack shit about politics, business or culture in Kerala. Fess-up Mr.Rumsfeld, you saw the word "communist" and freaked out.

    "I am arguing that [a communistic attitude toward big business] is the ONLY reason why they are doing what they are doing."

    First of all they claim the famous "MS monoply" as the reason, second: I will bet my left testicle that there is more than one non-communist-white-male-middle-aged-middle-class slashdotter who sees MS's monopoly as a prime reason for governments to avoid it.

    OTOH: I'm sure there are some politicians in the Kerala government that look for, or invent, reasons to demonise western style business, politics and culture. The political strategy behind this is simple scapegoating and is universal in human behaviour. Hypocricy is also a universal behaviour, eg: when zenophobic westeners are horrified to find themselves on the reciving end of zenophobic attitudes from non-westeners.

    --
    And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
  84. Preposterous by spysmily1 · · Score: 0, Troll

    How can a country attack the same company that hires their civilians over Americans? Or at least employ individuals that speak a dialect of English that I can understand for their customer support.

    Maybe now they'll start hiring someone that customers can understand and not waste 60 minutes just deciphering their code. But what is likely to happen is that they'll start hiring from some other country that horribly rapes the English language.

    --
    Videogames made me kill people...I also eat mushrooms to grow bigger.
    1. Re:Preposterous by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean such as americans, who have been reliably mangling the good queens english since 1773?

    2. Re:Preposterous by spysmily1 · · Score: 1

      I'm sorry if I'm supporting Microsoft, shame on me.

      --
      Videogames made me kill people...I also eat mushrooms to grow bigger.
  85. Re:Boo by lastninja · · Score: 1

    Are you implying that Cuba, North Korea and Iraq was in some way "doing better than the United States" ? The countries you listed were some of the worst of in the world long before the US took any interrest in them.

    --
    John Carmack fan, browsing at +5 since 1999.
  86. Why don't they... by salec · · Score: 1

    ...MAKE them come to their own conclusion? I mean, if you assign no money to buy software but FORBID under DRACONIAN measures use of pirated software and MANDATE that they must equip a number of computers, what else really they CAN do but download and install free software? Then they could boast around about their lawfull antipiracy policy instead of beeing accused of beeing anti-business.

    1. Re:Why don't they... by Shaper_pmp · · Score: 1

      PERHAPS because they've taken a TECHNOLOGY policy DECISION, and are looking to make a POINT to Microsoft and other large corporations, RATHER than just trying to GET Linux into SCHOOLS.

      In addition, why should they be as underhanded as you suggest? It was their call to make and they've taken it, including manning-up and taking any comeback on the chin (and I don't see them getting especially screamed at for being anti-business). Your suggestion reeks of underhandedness, and would more or less imply they think there is something wrong with what they're doing.

      Why be underhanded when you can be honest?

      And why use CAPS when you can use <em>..</em>?

      --
      Everything in moderation, including moderation itself
    2. Re:Why don't they... by salec · · Score: 1
      Why be underhanded when you can be honest?

      Oh, I actually suggest that they should be honest, or fair, to be exact.

      State their needs and let everyone compete (if the terms suit them).

      Who can tell, perhaps Microsoft would donate their software to India's schools for free and open a lot of technology development centers in India so that they Indian programmers can influence the process of making it suitable for their own needs and with affordable price, too?

      Outright closing the door in some potential contestants' faces is rude and irritating. Besides, the point to make is more...to the point, if it is made on failing to meet certain important terms of a contest i.e. openness, freedom. Other way, the point is only that point on top of the middle finger, which can be interpreted quite wrongly.

      On a sidenote, I actually expect Microsoft to become great and successful provider of free software (you can laugh... for now), because the overall pressure is rising, the landscape is changing and they will certainly not just die without trying to adapt themselves. I mean, the businesses and governments which actually do buy their products would be happy to buy service from them too, even if they had the source code on their disposal, while significant majority of user base in the world use pirated copies anyway. They already have more to gain then to lose if they switch on the Freedom side (i.e. disarming and eradicating the competition ... we should not trust them ... ever!).

      Remotely related to that (in case that other point is the one), you can be underhanded in your ends (in your mind) and yet completely honest in your conduct, break no rules, favorize none a priori, be up to your statements (just be sofisticated in making right statements). The world is full of such examples in politics and business. "Wheaseling" is the category term, is it not?

      In this case, it is "small wheaseling" or "defense of the weak": frontal rejection of offer from a big, wealthy, powerful global company residing in, and financing thru taxes, world's strongest military superforce (and armory of your archenemy neighbour) on the grounds of: "we don't like you for what you are" is a slap in the face to that company and looking for trouble (more trouble, that is). Rumor has it that this company is underhanded itself. Faced with a "brick wall" political decision of an governmental body of a foreign country (which, rumor has it, has fine income from insourcing from company's domicile country), the company will certainly pull own strings at home, political and media connections to unleash some pressure on that foreign country and in this case there certainly is plenty of opportunities for that.

      And why use CAPS when you can use ..?

      LAZ... er, I mean laziness!
  87. is the real story... by CDPatten · · Score: 1

    communism allies with OSS. Capitalism is pro-MS.

    ???

    LET THE FLAMING BEGIN!

    1. Re:is the real story... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sounds good to me. The less people in India trained on MS products - the less people I have to compete with. If the rest of the world was using FOSS then it would be more costly for US corporations to outsource help desk, net admin, portal development (SharePoint, CRM, etc) because they'd have to train them.
       
        So go a head and get that *nix install ready. We won't be needing you for Outlook support anymore.

      Thank you very nice.

    2. Re:is the real story... by Hucko · · Score: 1

      Seeing as communism functions by controlling a population to ensure everybody is equal, I would have put Closed Source is communist. 'They' decide what you need, and how you should do it. All your contributions are meted out to everyone else. (A similarity to Open Source, except that if you don't want your competitors to have your advantage, don't release it! Obviously not helpful to businesses based on software sales...) In Open Source the adage "Everyone is equal, some are more equal than others..." is apparent and true. (Trust me. I've seen people doing things on Linux that I want to do, but don't know how too...puts me into the more equal section, no?) Also, normal capital forces based on representative democracy are also evident as I doubt anyone really wanted the disparity of package systems that are available. I personally prefer Debian's deb system, but I'm using Suse. I have the choice to use/develop/install whatever system I want. The consequences of my choice are my own to choose. If I am using windows, I am lucky if the program allows me to choose where to install the software, and even then rarely puts all of it in the directory of my choice. In communism, the state chooses for all. In Closed Source, the 'state' chooses for all. Open source: don't like it, you have the option to change it. It works best within the agreed hierarchy, but even this can be flexible. Democracy (not working real well in Australia at the moment) you have a recourse to change the system. Open Source is democratic: your efforts can have a direct influence and you can bolster, and be recognised by, the wider community. Closed source: indirect influence for the majority, and efforts are recognised only at the discretion of the 'state'.

      --
      Semi-automatic amateur armchair Australian philosopher; conjecture ready at any moment...
  88. Re:Boo by ElleyKitten · · Score: 1
    I'd rather be killed by a nice boy like you, than an islamo-fascist any day.
    Is that sarcastic? Because it doesn't make any sense. Why would it be better to have nice boys killing people instead of "Islamo-facists"? The people aren't any less dead.
    --
    "What is Internet Explorer 7? Are you saying we can't access the normal internet?" - I love tech support. Really.
  89. Re:Boo by RedWizzard · · Score: 1
    People call the US a democracy but it is not.
    But by your own logic the US is a democracy anytime the president is a democrat (or the senate if you prefer, or maybe the house). If Kerala is currently a communist state then the US was a democracy 10 years ago and the UK is current a "labourist" state, whatever that means.
    I called them communist because they are run by the communist party.
    See you did it again.
  90. Sad by Meor · · Score: 0, Troll

    That's an unfortunate step backwards for that country.

    1. Re:Sad by TheVelvetFlamebait · · Score: 0

      Care to explain?

      In case you don't realise, the main differences between a troll mod and an interesting or insightful mod are details, evidence, or at least some form of elaboration.

      --
      You know, there is a difference between trolling and pointing out the flaws in your reasoning. Just saying.
    2. Re:Sad by Meor · · Score: 1

      I'll bite that troll.
      I find irony in a statement, by a government, encouraging removal of a piece of software in order to promote a democratic society. Unless there is a law requiring Microsoft to be installed on certain computers, everyone is submitting a vote for the operating system they like, one system at a time.
      A government suggesting a brand of products to use reeks of political corruption and insider trading.

    3. Re:Sad by Anonymous+Cowled · · Score: 1
      um.... or perhaps the Kerala government is reccommending the use of free software for a reason?

      From TFA:
      About 30,000 computers are already in use in schools across the state, and the Education Ministry said about 600,000 students opted to take free software training classes this year.

      Now, if you also consider - also from TFA:
      The Education Ministry has an annual budget of 40 million rupees, or $1.86 million, to promote computer technology among the one million students, aged between 5 and 15, currently at school -- a sum that will be stretched as Mr. Baby attempts to fulfill his ambition of making all the state's "schoolchildren computer literate."

      With one computer to 20 students - it makes obvious sense to use a free operating system which will do everything a paid for operating system will do, thus saving between $25 and $30 per computer for 1 version of Windows - which may or may not even be a full version (Windows Starter Edition, anyone? http://www.microsoft.com/presspass/newsroom/winxp/ 08-10WinXPStarterFS.mspx)
  91. Slashdot logic FAQ #73 by TapeCutter · · Score: 1

    "open source good, microsoft bad, but hang on, is communist open source good or bad?"

    Slashdot logic FAQ #73:
    Two wrongs cancel each other to make a right.

    FAQ #73 History:
    First articulated in the new testemant as "an eye for an eye", disputed by Gandhi who was ironically assasinated.

    FAQ #73 Proof:
    Communist - MS => OSS : therefore : Wrong - Wrong => Right.

    --
    And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
    1. Re:Slashdot logic FAQ #73 by aesiamun · · Score: 1

      So...

      communism is only bad when using MS products?

      I was never good at logic :)

    2. Re:Slashdot logic FAQ #73 by TapeCutter · · Score: 1

      Dealing with MS is bad communisim but not all bad communists deal with MS.

      --
      And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
    3. Re:Slashdot logic FAQ #73 by timeOday · · Score: 1
      First articulated in the new testemant as "an eye for an eye", disputed by Gandhi who was ironically assasinated.
      Could you explain why that is Ironic? I guess you could prove his murder was the ultimate proof of his failure to curb violence, but I still think he had a big impact on the world. Same for Martin Luther King. Also Jesus.
    4. Re:Slashdot logic FAQ #73 by TapeCutter · · Score: 1

      Disclaimer: I agree that Gandhi was an important "prophet" in the grand scheme of things.

      "Could you explain why that is Ironic?

      His assasination demonstrated that his interpretation of an "eye for and eye" was correct, yet he was assasinated by someone who obviously had a different interpretaion of an "eye for eye".

      --
      And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
  92. Re:Linux initiative was taken by earlier governeme by Jedi+Alec · · Score: 1

    Yikes, so not only are we talked an elected communist government, but one actually willing to implement policy set by the previous one?

    * Goes and sits in a corner waiting for the universe to fold in on itself.

    --

    People replying to my sig annoy me. That's why I change it all the time.
  93. So a Communist Government wants to get rid of by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Microsoft Software on State machines because Microsoft is a monopoly? What do they call the communist party in a Communist Government? MS should fit right in with their "effeciency" of government by brooking no diversion from the party line. Heh, that is interesting.

    How fitting, the word in immage happens to be "commune" for me to submit this!

  94. Re:Boo by IndigoParadox · · Score: 2, Informative

    I think he means Jane.

  95. Re:Boo by ajs318 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The UK's government is neither socialist nor particularly democratic. After selling out the Labour party, ditching Clause Four and receiving votes from rather less than a quarter of the population, Tony Blair is basically carrying on with Thatcherism ..... except that people let him get away with it, simply because he is not Thatcher.

    Did I mention that he also licks G.W.Bush's arse?

    The only reason the UK hasn't been booted out of the EU a long time ago is the hope that we might join the Euro. It would then be economically viable for the Euro, rather than the US dollar, to be used as the principal currency for trade in crude oil. However, despite the clear and obvious benefits to the majority of the population {lower prices, no more getting fleeced by bureaux de change when travelling abroad} the Murdoch-owned media {under the influence of the carpetbaggers who stand to lose most from the adoption of the Euro} has managed to hoodwink people into believing that using the same coin as our continental cousins would somehow compromise Britain's "sovereignty" despite not being able to provide an adequate definition of what sovereignty actually means.

    --
    Je fume. Tu fumes. Nous fûmes!
  96. Nonsense from NYT as usual... by jkrise · · Score: 5, Informative

    "the Communist government in India's southern state of Kerala "

    It is a democrtically elected coalition government in Kerala, led by a Communist party. And communism has no bearing on the discussion.

    "The Education Ministry has an annual budget of 40 million rupees, or $1.86 million, to promote computer technology among the one million students"

    One US dollar is about 45 Indian rupees or thereabouts. So, 40 million rupees would be less than a million dollars.

    "Financial, rather than ideological, reasons may be at the root of the state's decision to promote free software."

    Again, not true. People in Kerala have been using computers since the mid '80s actually. The VSSC (Vikram Sarabhai Space Centre) in Trivandrum, the capital of Kerala has lots of Sun graphic workstations supplied by Wipro in the late '80s. Many public sector undertakings, banks and the Railways have been users of Unix based systems for decades now. Many companies in India have realised that it's a total waste of time, money and effort to invest in Microsoft, Oracle and Cisco equipment and their closed-source zero-innovation ideologies for their computing needs.

    The Indian branch of the Free Software Foundation is located in Kerala, again because of the high literacy rates, and the forward-thinking, proud and practical people of Kerala. Even if Windows Vista is released free for all the students in Kerala, they would not be inclined to waste their time.

    --
    If you keep throwing chairs, one day you'll break windows....
    1. Re:Nonsense from NYT as usual... by dmleach · · Score: 1

      One US dollar is about 45 Indian rupees or thereabouts. So, 40 million rupees would be less than a million dollars.

      God bless Google:

      "40000000 currency of india in USD"

      40 000 000 Indian rupees = 859 869.257 U.S. dollars

    2. Re:Nonsense from NYT as usual... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      It is a democrtically elected coalition government in Kerala, led by a Communist party.


      That is, right there, exactly what communism is. There are many ways a communist government can be established; one of these ways is by having it be voted in in a democratic election. It does not make the government any less communist to have it done this way.

      Communism, despite what you may have been taught in high school, does not resemble Stalin's totalitarianism-in-another-name.
    3. Re:Nonsense from NYT as usual... by DoctorDyna · · Score: 1
      Many companies in India have realised that it's a total waste of time, money and effort to invest in Microsoft, Oracle and Cisco equipment and their closed-source zero-innovation ideologies for their computing needs.


      Was this meant as a broad stroke slam at all the current top companies in the industry? Did you actually mean to insinuate that this town's "*nix" solution incorporates routers, switches, muxers and ATM line equipment from a company other than Cisco? Can you elaborate on that? Are there any others in the industry aside from yourself that might be able to substantiate the claims you seem to be making that the current top companies in technology are "zero-innovation"?

      The Indian branch of the Free Software Foundation is located in Kerala, again because of the high literacy rates, and the forward-thinking, proud and practical people...


      Oh, I see. Adjectives such as "Forward-thinking", "Proud", "Practical" apply more / only to people who choose to move away from sucsessful companies and their products? It wouldn't have anything to do with the fact that the entire town runs on a budget remarkably similar to the budget of a small school district in a rural area, would it? Also, I'm curious to see some demographic data that you are obviously privvy to that demonstrates the correlation between literacy rates and where a FOSS branch appears. Seriously. 5 Informative now, so, put your money where your mouth is and let's see some non-make beleive statistics, based in fact and non-biased by what is obviously a karma whore move by yet another FOSS crusader that uses every possibly chance they have to try and turd polish.

      Don't get me wrong, I love the whole idea of FOSS, and I generally agree with most of the things you guys say, but this is just childish. Let's see some hard facts before we moderate posts like this. "that sounds pretty good and pro-foss" shouldn't cut it as being top-rated informative.

      --
      Windows has more viruses because linux has more virus coders.
    4. Re:Nonsense from NYT as usual... by SSCGWLB · · Score: 1

      God knows it worked well for them in the past...

      "Nevertheless, relatively few major corporations and manufacturing plants choose to operate in Kerala;[39] this is mitigated by remittances sent home by overseas Keralites, which contributes around 20% of state GDP.[40] Kerala's per capita GDP -- 11,819 INR[41] -- is significantly higher than the all-India average,[37] although it still lies far below the world average." cite

      Seriously, the GDP of that country is less the MS makes in a year, why would they worry?

      Also, "it's a total waste of time, money and effort to invest in Microsoft, Oracle and Cisco equipment and their closed-source zero-innovation ideologies for their computing needs". That a stupid statment. You don't like their products, their prices, their business practices? Fine. However, you obviously arn't a student of history if you think they have 'zero-innovation'. Can they still innovate? Thats the important question.

      ~nate

    5. Re:Nonsense from NYT as usual... by Big_Al_B · · Score: 2, Informative

      Seriously, the GDP of that country is less the MS makes in a year, why would they worry?

      Wow. India's GDP is around $3.32 trillion dollars per year. I didn't know M$ was that profitable.

      Oh, you probably meant the _state_ of Kerala's GDP Is lower the M$ profit.

      Let's google that:

      Kerala GDP == 89451.99 Cr ~= $18.37 billion
      M$ FY2005 Net Income ~= $12.6 billion

      Hm. I think you're maybe bad at geography *and* economics.

  97. Re:the communist government in the Indian state of by h00pla · · Score: 1
    You're absolutely right. And not only that - the article uses very inflamatory language, calling it 'attack on multinational corporations'. The title also puts the word monopoly in quotes, as if to suggest that there are those of the opinion that Microsoft is a monopoly (ignoring, of course the fact that they were convicted of being a monopoly in the US, fined in the EU, Korea, etc.). In short, it's worded in such a way that it looks like a grave injustice is being done to poor Microsoft.

    --
    I've been swashdotted -- Elmer Fudd
  98. Re:Finally! we can really complain about the commi by gantzm · · Score: 1

    I wish that some of the west's politicians would start considering budgets and futures.

    They do consider the future. But to them the future stops at the next election.

    --


    Excessive forking causes un-wanted children.
  99. Re:Why don't they...even more encouragement by chawly · · Score: 1

    They could offer free spelling lessons with each download.

    --
    How many beans make five, anyhow ? ... Charles Walmsley
  100. Re:Boo by bky1701 · · Score: 1
    About the best you can say is that the jury is still out on the matter.
    If the jury is still out, why is it feared more then nuclear weapons?
  101. why oss/linux ? by escapedown · · Score: 1

    it seems kerala Govt did not evaluate thier need for software, they just joined anti M$ camp to be in the news. linux is free but not support, they can not ask Redhat/Suse to freely support ultimatly they have to pay. linux is good for developement and can handle good load (if it is used as server). now how kerala govt is going to use linux in schools, it has bloated office suite and average user feel difficult to use. --mad

    1. Re:why oss/linux ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mmmmm...he card read good!

    2. Re:why oss/linux ? by Gonoff · · Score: 3, Interesting

      How much more support does someone using a Linux PC use than someone using a Windows one? I would suggest that the difference for the average office worker, the difference is zero, or less.

      Why? A word processor is that, no more and no less. A web browser should just work. Email is email, whatever you are running. And so on...

      I would suggest that people need less support once things are up and running. They need exactly the same training to get started. The technicians who set up or image the PCs in the first place will likely have an easier time too. Ubuntu, for example, is a LOT easier and faster to install than XP. It doesn't need hand-holding anti-virus software it is far better at network updates and is a lot more secure from the start.

      But many/most(?) people here knew this anyway.

      --
      I'll see your Constitution and raise you a Queen.
    3. Re:why oss/linux ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are right, a web browser should just work. But it doesn't. The version of firefox that came with Dapper Drake has some serious issues with a few sites I have been to, and in addition, being the linux newbie I am, I still haven't been able to install the Java Runtime enviroment. Even installing flash requires going into the terminal, something the large majority of trhe students at my school would not be comfortable doing.

      Until Ubuntu makes it easier to install something that isn't in the universe by using a graphical installer utility, people are going to feel turned off by it and reluctant to use it. And it's supposed to be one of the more user friendly distros.

  102. Re:the communist government in the Indian state of by Rakshasa+Taisab · · Score: 2, Interesting

    That's nothing, consider this headline from reuters yesterday, I'm left wondering what Hizbollah really wants:

    "Annan urges quick end to Israel, Hizbollah disputes"

    --
    - These characters were randomly selected.
  103. Re:Boo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Who the hell mods this as flamebait? This whole thread is full of f$cked up moderation.

  104. Oh the irony by BladesP9 · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    A communist government, which is a monopoly of it's own right, not giving people a chance to choose based on practices of which itself is guilty. The irony never stops.

    1. Re:Oh the irony by vihung · · Score: 1

      The communist-led coallition government in Kerala is a legislative assembly and is democratically elected. The term Communist refers to economic and social policy, not to who enacts that policy and how it is decided. Get your facts right

    2. Re:Oh the irony by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      A communist government, which is a monopoly of it's own right
      You're suggesting the state should have several governments?
  105. Slightly Offtopic... by bangenge · · Score: 1

    I am so shocked that no chair jokes are made yet...

    --
    . o O ( TwO hEaDs ArE mOrE tHaN oNe... )
    1. Re:Slightly Offtopic... by maxwell+demon · · Score: 1

      In Soviet Russia, chairs throw you!

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
  106. Re:Boo by kfg · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It's so much better when a nation has the right to be sick and obese.

    Well, perhaps I've grown a bit out of touch; and I understand that Kerala is relatively well off compared to much of India with only 25% of the populace below the poverty level, relative to what is considered the poverty level in India, but I was unware that an excess of calories in the diet had suddenly become a systemic problem in India.

    KFG

  107. Re:Boo by TheShadowzero · · Score: 1

    Because of propoganda. From a young age we are taught in school that MJ is bad for you, it's illegal, blah blah blahh. The majority of lemmings that don't do their own research believe it.

    --
    If history repeats itself, why can't we study the future?
  108. Re:Boo by 1u3hr · · Score: 1
    Actually, Coke and Pepsi showed that research to be flawed, and as I understand it linked it to the water.

    Of course it was linked to the water. They have the responsibility to make sure the ingredinets they're using are safe.

    And I could care less if they can't sell their expensive sugar water drinks. They're hardly good for health, most especially of children.

  109. Broadcast flag by codepunk · · Score: 1

    Yea you also mean like you have to use products tht contain technology that recognizes
    the broadcast flag?

    --


    Got Code?
  110. It's Called Choice by aquatone282 · · Score: 1

    And if people choose Microsoft, that's their business.

    All any government should do is making sure people are free to make their own choices and that no one company is able to limit their choices.

    --
    What?
  111. Communism against monopolies? by sprins · · Score: 0, Flamebait
    ...communist government in the Indian state of Kerala is trying to remove Microsoft from its public institutions, as part of a campaign against monopolistic corporations.
    Irony? Communism is a totalitarian political system, isn't it? Apparently the government wants the monopoly on monopolism as well...
  112. Re:Boo by dumeinst · · Score: 1

    Hear hear.

  113. Re:Boo by skoaldipper · · Score: 0
    Perhaps, but in that case why the fuck is non-thc-rich HEMP illegal?
    It is? Somebody better tell the Whole Food store chains down here in Texas then. They sell HEMP waffles at $4.50/box. I just had me some yummy doobie waffles slathered in molasses for breakfast this morning. The funny thing about those waffles is they make me even more hungry. At $4.50/box x 5 boxes per week, I think smoking the real deal might be a bit cheaper.
    --
    I hope, when they die, cartoon characters have to answer for their sins.
  114. Re:Finally! we can really complain about the commi by Red+Flayer · · Score: 1
    they chose their current political leaders, no totalitarian dictators here.

    Communism != totalitarianism.

    The 'communist' label has been appropriated by many dictators, as has the 'socialist' label (see: 1930s Europe), and the 'democratic' label (see: post-colonial Africa).

    I'm not familiar enough with the area in question to know whether or not the communist party there is truly communist or not, but please don't equate communism with totalitarianism.
    --
    "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
  115. anti-this v pro that by TheStonepedo · · Score: 1

    It is one thing to be for cheap/free alternatives, but to be against something strictly because its goal is to control as much market share as possible is quite different. It is everybody's goal to be #1; Microsoft just happens to hold the place due to good timing, marketing, and a long time without viable alternatives. Encouraging free software is certainly a noble thing, but rejecting one specific brand commercial software outright is akin to mudslinging.

    --
    I'll be your candy shop of infinite deliciousity if you'll be my discotheque of endless rump-shaking.
  116. Re:Boo by TheVelvetFlamebait · · Score: 0
    The New York times seems to be trying to stir up "Fear, Anxiety and doubt".
    Fear, Anxiety and doubt? Sounds like a FAd to me. Gimme good old fasioned FUD!
    --
    You know, there is a difference between trolling and pointing out the flaws in your reasoning. Just saying.
  117. Re:Boo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's so much better when a nation has the right to be sick and obese.
     
    So, automatically, drinking soda makes you fat and sick? Get real. The idea of having food stuff made available to people that isn't 100% good for you has been a trend since pre-history. I'd be interested to see if this same state has beat down on other substances that are even more dangerous such as smokes and booze. Or are you going to claim that Coke is just as bad as Camels? I guess in the right ratio they are but under normal circumstances it's simply not true at all.
     
    It's pathetic you even defend this. So now, instead of crying "terrorism" or "what about the children" the new battlecry of governments can be "it makes you sick (if you consume enough of it)"

  118. Re:the communist government in the Indian state of by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Istead of just saying Kerala's state government decided to encourage this and that.

    Uhhh, maybe that's because being "encouraged" by a democratic based government has an entirely different historical (read:fact based) context than being "encouraged" by a communist one. See: Joseph Stalin, Pol Pot, Vladimir Lenin, Mao Tse-tung, etc.

  119. Re:Boo by GundamFan · · Score: 1

    Michael Jane, does he play for Orlando?

    --
    I don't give a damn for a man that can only spell a word one way.
    Mark Twain
  120. why communist? by grgcombs · · Score: 1

    Why does it matter if it's a communist state or not. What does that have to do with any other part of the story. What, are we back in the Red Scare again? The communist country of China says X. The communist country of North Korea says Y. The middle-aged white man of Texas says who gives a sh*t whether they're communist or dairy workers. This has nothing to do with the story of getting rid of microsoft. Just leave the word out if it doesn't matter, K?

  121. Re:Boo by Whiney+Mac+Fanboy · · Score: 1

    At $4.50/box x 5 boxes per week, I think smoking the real deal might be a bit cheaper.

    If you're eating five boxes of waffles slathered in molasses a week, then I think smoking the real deal might be a bit healthier! ;-)

    --
    There are shills on slashdot. Apparently, I'm one of them.
  122. Re:Boo by tutori · · Score: 1

    I was under the impression that only growing it was illegal, as it could be used to hide growing of marijuana.

  123. Re:Boo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Seems we have a moderator that was born in Kerala!

  124. Sounds Like... by Greyfox · · Score: 1
    Someone's trying to get a discount on Microsoft products.

    I'd be willing to bet Ballmer makes a surprise visit to the region and shortly thereafter they announce they've changed their mind about the whole thing.

    --

    I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

  125. Re:Boo by E+IS+mC(Square) · · Score: 1

    But that's not the point. The point is that Indian state governments (and the federal too) have to play the populist politics. And for Communist (elected) governments in Kerala and West Bengal, MNCs are the first target. And banning an MNC is what they always look for first. Being "Elected" has nothing to do with running their own propaganda - be it Kerala or USA. So, lets not confuse the democracy with that.

    Having said that, this (non-MS products) may actually be good for the public. Its ironic that the government is taking a decision for reasons completely different, but end result is genuinly in public benefit! Indian state governments normally take bad decisions with result in bad things, but this is definitely an exception.

  126. relax by mapkinase · · Score: 1

    Chill out, parent. The submitter just likes to add a little spice in his posts, figuratively speaking. To stir, figuratively speaking. Hey, that works well for Digg, right? With half of the posts continaing the word "amazing"^h^h^h^h^h^h^h"AMAZING".

    The dogma of modern capitalism is if you want to win you have to cry out loud: "Pick me, choose me!!!!". Yet the most astounding successes of modern days are brought by the products and strategies that disregard this dogma in favor of solid content. Take, well, Google, for example. Its enormous success of the past was accumulated due to their 100% user (vs market) oriented interface.

    The best consumer products I have got in the last 10 years in US went out of the market pretty quickly. They were simple, very inexpensive tools that eased my life immensely. They were phased out by monstrous common denominator catering heavily shamelessly marketed trash that will break exactly to the time of the next "improvement". Is that what we want?

    There is a good reason to keep a balance between capitalism and socialism in the system. Of course, that balance is not needed and dangerous of course when your goal is to achieve the world dominance in less than 8 years.

    I admit, the post is slightly OFF topic, but, heck, so was the "communist" remark in the original post.

    --
    I do not believe in karma. "Funny"=-6. Do good and forbid evil. Yours, Oft-Offtopic Flamebaiting Troll.
  127. Re:Boo by 1jpablo1 · · Score: 1

    Well said!

  128. Re:the communist government in the Indian state of by sh4na · · Score: 1

    As already pointed out, the Kerala government is a democracy, with the ruling party being a communist one. Communism is a social ideology, and it is not = to dictatorship or despotism. And it has nothing to do with stalinistic totalitarian governments. In many democracies around the world there are communist parties that participate in the democratic process, are elected and rule in parliaments and local councils. The bias towards the Red Scare of gosh-golly eeevil communist dictatorships is a common american thing. Welcome to the real world, get over it.

    --
    shana
    ......gone crazy, back soon, leave message
  129. M A Baby by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "It is well-known that Microsoft wants to have a monopoly in the field of computer technology. Naturally, being a democratic and progressive government, we want to encourage the spread of free software," M. A. Baby

    M. A. Baby ????

    Am I the only one that who thought the person's name sounded too comical for the story?

    1. Re:M A Baby by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yeah, ignorant-I-only-know-my-backyard parent,

      other parts of the world have names which might sound different in your language. in any case, even in english, 'bush' is something you use under furniture as a padding, or within machinery.

      incidentally, chene in kerala's language means 'pregnancy in a bovine'.

    2. Re:M A Baby by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, sounds as if someone is having a bad day or, as is probably the case, needing to fulfill some inner void missing from your life by creating a false sense of empowerment.

    3. Re:M A Baby by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      so that was your reason? I can understand.. with all those jobs going to Indians, the best you can do is to make fun of their names.

  130. Re:Finally! we can really complain about the commi by fantomas · · Score: 1

    I totally agree with you that 'communist' has been appropriated by many dictators. As you note dictators tend to adopt whatever is fashionable and acceptable for the time, including 'democratic'. Probably a lot of nasty small places will use terminology acceptable to the US government in the next few years seeing as the USA is the dominant world power (while still carrying out terrible human rights abuses).

    I think the politicians in Kerala are pretty solid about their communist beliefs, but you need to dig into this to get their exact positions on various issues, politics is like flavours of linux eh, lots of subtlety and the most passionate debates are about aspects of their positions that outsiders really don't care about...

    Equally I think we agree being communist doesn't preclude one from being involved in democratic politics, there's a history of communist participation in parliamentary democracies. I was just having a little fun with the slashdot stereotype of right wing readers :-)

  131. yay and a few points by gsn · · Score: 1

    Im confused as to how this degenerated into a cola war - TFA's point was about Linux. Or GNU/Linux if you really want. No it probably wont be a problem if different schools/libraries/whatever use different linux distros - theres more than enough common, and you know most of them will go in with gnome or kde so they will look basically the same. The hardware shouldn't be a problem since a lot of it will be pretty old.

    Also NYT (yes they are not reading /. but I can mail them) and poster rm999 (yes yes I know hes already been modded flamebait but I'm going to chomp)....

    I'm sick of the communist bogeyman. You can mod me flamebait right now if you like but I'm going to make a point. The CPI are a communist party in that they support communist ideals but yes India is a democracy with universal sufferage even (since 1950 and you might argue it was a lot more universal than African Americans were getting in Alabama at the same time). Whether or not they actually live up to communist ideals is another story. But not a different story than a democracy that lives up to democratic ideals by wiretapping its citizens. Sure theres some pandering to the voters by bashing multi-national companies like Pepsi or Coke. Funny I thought that happens here around election time when someone gets us and announces incentives to American farming companies say. The EU certainly thinks so.

    Yes the article was probably being biased by mentioning "communist" in the title but these guys aren't communist in the same way as Stalin's USSR or North Korea or *shudder* the PRC, which is quickly becoming the latest "bloc." I'm not an apologist for any of the human rights violations in those countries but please realize that any time you mention communist it does not imply human rights violations. I'll soon have to be yelling this about Islamic states too. Studying current events instead of getting your information from FOX news and actually reading some history makes it much harder to stereotype systems of government. The worst the current communists can do in Kerala are massive unannounced strikes and rallies. Its great intending to drive somewhere and getting stuck in one - you will be there a while. The noise about Pepsi and Coke will go away soon either after election time (or some money greases someones hands). Lets not point fingers so easily shall we... theres a good chap.

    Theres actually a whole bunch of communist parties in the US that are not defunct though we all know in a real democracy we have only two viable parties.

    disclaimer: not communist just very liberal

    --
    Reality must take precedence over public relations, for nature cannot be fooled.
  132. Re:Boo by jamar0303 · · Score: 1

    I heard on the local news (in China) that large amounts of pesticide or some other poisonous chemical were found in Coke and Pepsi in India and China- maybe that has something to do with this ban?

    --
    OSx86 FTW
  133. Re:Boo by jamar0303 · · Score: 1

    MJ? Well... he's bad in a different way, I suppose. At least marijuana can't molest children.

    --
    OSx86 FTW
  134. Re:Boo by patiodragon · · Score: 1

    "Explain why they *banned* coke and pepsi.."

    Alleged pesticide residue:
    http://www.examiner.com/a-237549~Indian_States_Rei terate_Coke__Pepsi_Ban.html

    The Indian government, however, said it was OK, though, so I'm SURE there isn't any problem.

  135. Re:Finally! we can really complain about the commi by indifferent+children · · Score: 1
    They do consider the future. But to them the future stops at the next election.

    And for many of them it will.

    --
    Censorship is telling a man he can't have a steak just because a baby can't chew it. --Mark Twain
  136. A+B C by alexgieg · · Score: 1

    Let's put this stright. If company/service/whatever A is big and company/service/whatever B is small, and one thinks this difference to be "unjust", thus asking the government to help, the said "injustice" doesn't go away, because then you end up having company/service/whatever B plus Gov. as the big guy, and the original company/service/whatever A Alone as the small one.

    Actually, anything that gets the status plus Gov. will always, without exception, be bigger and more powerful than anything what hasn't this status. So, either you give up in thinking that the difference in size is by itself unjust, or you'll have an unsolvable problem in hand. Why? Because you'll then have to start making decisions on HOW MUCH of the plug Gov. status you have to add to each and every company/service/whatever so that A plus X% Gov. perfectly balances out B plus Y% Gov., both perfectly balancing out C plus Z% Gov., and so on and so forth, with X%, Y%, Z% etc. having to be constantly (almost in real time really) reevaluated and redistributed. After all, neither A, nor B, nor C etc. are static and unchangeable.

    And that's not to mention the problems arising from new players entering the market and old players leaving it, or the even worse problems arising from external governments also backing their global companies/services/whatevers to counter-compensate the local governments backing of their local companies/services/whatevers...

    --
    Conservatism: (n.) love of the existing evils. Liberalism: (n.) desire to substitute new evils for the existing ones.
  137. M. A. Baby, the state's education minister by PrayingWolf · · Score: 1

    m a baby. Get it? M a baby.. oh forget it.
    Only thing is, he is not a she...

  138. Re:Finally! we can really complain about the commi by Red+Flayer · · Score: 1
    I was just having a little fun with the slashdot stereotype of right wing readers :-)
    Sorry, I guess one flew over the cuckoo's nest, there.

    Probably a lot of nasty small places will use terminology acceptable to the US government in the next few years seeing as the USA is the dominant world power (while still carrying out terrible human rights abuses).

    Nothing new there. Again, I'm pretty stuck on post-colonial Africa (where we propped up the 'democratic' regime of Mugabe for decades, and continue to do the like) -- I just finished reading The Fate of Africa by Martin Meredith. Illuminating and disturbing.
    --
    "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
  139. Re:Boo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think he means Jane Jackson.

  140. woo? by tanveer1979 · · Score: 1

    The "for coke pepsi" brigade says there is pestiside in local water too. So why single them out. Well many times while travelling I have not taken local water because of impurity dangers. Now if I am paying money to drink something, I expect it to be free of pesticides. There is nothing new in this issue, its over a year old and keeps shuffling from one dept to other.

    --
    My Aurora : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o91ZsGwJYyg
    FB : https://www.facebook.com/TanveersPhotography
  141. Re:Boo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The greens are only "not communist" because they're in denial or being intentionally deceptive.

  142. kind of f unny by kz45 · · Score: 1

    "as part of a campaign against monopolistic corporations"

    hmm..are they going to stop servicing monopolistic corporations too? Since many citizens work at call centers that support these corporations, I don't see this as very effective.

  143. Re:Boo by Risen888 · · Score: 1

    For the record, that's not fascism, it's pretty much your garden-variety authoritarianism. If you wanted an example of the United States being a fascist entity, there are several. From Wikipedia:

    "Fascism may be defined as a form of political behavior marked by obsessive preoccupation with community decline, humiliation, or victim-hood and by compensatory cults of unity, energy, and purity, in which a mass-based party of committed nationalist militants, working in uneasy but effective collaboration with traditional elites, abandons democratic liberties and pursues with redemptive violence and without ethical or legal restraints goals of internal cleansing and external expansion."

    Feel free to chime in with comparisons involving neo-conservatism, fanatical Christianity, corporate lackey-ism, Manifest Destiny in the Middle East, or any combination thereof.

    --
    Hey, I finally got my first freak! Took you long enough!
  144. Re:A+B C by ElleyKitten · · Score: 1

    Except Linux isn't a company, so they're not supporting one company over another (they're not even supporting - they're recommending). Linux is an open source operating system that can be supported and modified by any company or group of people. India has a lot of underemployed skilled technical people, having them support and modify Linux distros for Indian schools and companies is much better for India than those companies and schools sending their money to another country.

    --
    "What is Internet Explorer 7? Are you saying we can't access the normal internet?" - I love tech support. Really.
  145. Interesting Spin by MrZaius · · Score: 1

    It was interesting the spin that CNBC put on this story:
    "A communist government in India has banned Microsoft from government computers." The gal's voice was just dripping with sarcasm and hatred.

    It's a normal, exciting event when a Christian Democrat or Republican-controlled state or city government starts calling Novel/SuSE and Red Hat, but when communist does it, it really changes the way the media in the US reacts. Btw, they might have been a little mode sedate and professional when interviewing an exec from Red Hat later in the show. Didn't catch the interview.

  146. Re:Boo by ndogg · · Score: 1

    They're all imported. Growing HEMP in the US is illegal because the stupid authorities can't tell the difference between HEMP plants and marijuana.

    --
    // file: mice.h
    #include "frickin_lasers.h"
  147. No, the cat does not "got my tongue." by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 1

    > "The New York Times reports that the communist government in the
    >Indian state of Kerala is trying to remove Microsoft from its public institutions

    Ummm, India:

    1. Isn't doing so well with their own economic models. For a minister to pretend he's suddenly concerned is beyond belief.

    2. India is home to massive governmental-guaranteed (i.e. government-owned) monopolies in hundreds of major industries. If India's primary software were provided by a government-owned company, and had a greater market share than MS, with more quality and security problems, this buffoon rail against privatization with every fiber of his being.

    Oh, the temerity of politicians.

    --
    (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
  148. On the virtues of being judgemental by jmorris42 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    > And exactly why is being a communist bad?

    A hundred years ago you could have been excused for speaking something so horrific on the grounds that the jury was still out. History has now rendered its verdict. All of the fad philosophies of the late 19th and early 20th century were fatally flawed. It wasn't just that there were implemented poorly, the wrong people were in charge, the revolution wasn't hijacked. Communism, Socialism, National Socialism, Fascism, all were similar far more than they differed. All were based on the idea that an annoited 'wise' few were capable to and therefore would make all of the decisions and use the power of the modern nationstate to enforce their edicts at gunpoint. All four resulted in millions of corpses in mass graves each and every time any people anywhere tried to implement them. No, shut the fuck up you idiots in the back row, EVERY TIME.

    > It is just another idea that tries to create a perfect world.

    And gave us Adolph Hitler, Joseph Stalin, Valdimir Lenin, Chairman Mao, Pol Pot, Fidel Castro.... need I continue? NO admirable figures headed up a communist state or similar state. The weakened version, socialism, has left Europe an enfeebled ghost of its former self and is on course to lead to the total loss of Western Civilization. Fascism and National Socialism proved so virulent it required WWII to purge it and even today just speaking their names causes all right thinking people to shudder in memory of the horrors.

    > a) tell other people what's good and what's not good (tell as in force them to...)

    But isn't that the core idea that underlies all four philosiphical systems you seem to admire? That a small elite, (wise and educated beyond the mere mortals they rule over) will make all decisions, for the people's 'own good.' So why is it good when a cabal of communists decide what is best for the people but so totally wrong when Western corporations try to export market proven products.

    Hey, I agree with installing the penguin over spanding scarce export dollars, but lets be clear about these guys motivations, k?

    --
    Democrat delenda est
    1. Re:On the virtues of being judgemental by Ekimus · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      > A hundred years ago you could have been excused for speaking something so
      > horrific on the grounds that the jury was still out. History has now rendered its
      > verdict. All of the fad philosophies of the late 19th and early 20th century were
      > fatally flawed.

      So when was democracy invented again? Every idea has it's flaws but still I do have respect for these ideas (do not mix that up with admiring them) I'm just so full of it that everything that is not a democracy is bad.

      And your* so much loved democracy put how many people to guantamo without even being charged for something just because there is a possibility?

      *Note: "your democracy" I'm not saying you're from the US

      --
      You are not free to read this message, by doing so, you have violated my licence and are required to urinate publicly. T
  149. Kerala Enigma by vivin · · Score: 1

    Yep, darn nice place. Not just saying it because I'm from there :)

    I know I posted it before, but still makes a good read:

    Kerala Enigma
    Kerala Model

    I remember how quickly things have changed in Kerala over the past few years. It is a good environment for open source to take root. I graduated High School in 1999 (in Oman) and before moving to the US to start college, I spent four months in Kerala - the longest I've ever spent. Back then to get access to the internet, you had to go to Ernakulam, which is about a hour-long car drive from my hometown. When my sister went to India in 2002, there was an Internet Cafe 15 minutes from our house. Broadband too. It only took three years. When I went there in 2004, there were even more internet cafes, and when I went back there again in May there were Internet Cafes all OVER the place - most people are well-versed with the internet and just computers in general. Another thing that you can find in Kerala is computer institutes - all over the place. Billboards advertising training in C/C++/Java/Webdesign etc. etc. Kerala already has a good presence in Open Source (Malayalam Open Source Software, More Malayalam Open Source). A lot of this might be due to the fact that Kerala is the most literate state in India, and also one of the most politically aware. A Malayalee's day starts with a look at the morning newspaper. Also because of the cost-benefits in general, and the fact that Kerala has a penchant for communism, open source will find a good environment to thrive. Monopolies... maybe not so much. Finally, the bulk of the microsoft software is pirated, and with all the validation stuff Microsoft has for their software, it would be easier to make the switch to open source. Then there is also the fact that recently Microsoft conducted a sort of raid in Kerala to look for illegal copies of Microsoft software.

    Of course, all this might go down the drain due to the fact that even the most well-intentioned ideas can be disrupted by the notorious hartals (strikes).

    --
    Vivin Suresh Paliath
    http://vivin.net

    I like
  150. Re:Boo by Yosho · · Score: 1

    Why should the government tell me which choices are "wrong"? How would you feel if the government ruled that alchoholic beverages are illegal because they cause people to behave irresponsibly and can cause alcohol poisoning?

    I see far more "cool" beer commercials than I do Pepsi commercials, coincidentally.

    --
    Karma: Terrifying (mostly affected by atrocities you've committed)
  151. This actually proves that MS is NOT a monopoly by I'm+Don+Giovanni · · Score: 0, Redundant

    I find it amusing when someone (a state, person, business), says, "We hate Microsoft because they're a monopoly, so I'm going to use other products!! Stickin' it to the MAN. Oh Yeaaaah!!" The irony is that the ability to use other products disproves that MS is a monopoly.

    How can a state claim that they're fighting against a monopoly by using other products? That a state *can* move entirely to other products proves that there is no monopoly to begin with.

    How about using other products because they're "better" (more value for the buck, better support, etc) rather than for some political agenda? If the non-MS software is "better", then great, use it on that basis. But if the MS products are actually "better", but not being used for the sake of a political agenda, then this state is screwing over its citizens by making them take part in the anti-MS jihad that most of them likely couldn't care less about.

    --
    -- "I never gave these stories much credence." - HAL 9000
  152. Re:Boo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes, that is substantially correct. It's a fallacious argument though, as marijuana needs plenty of sunlight to grow, and preferably an absence of male plants to produce an optimal product.

    In practice hemp plantations make it very difficult to produce sinsemillia (unfertilized and very potent) weed for miles around the plantation, as the hemp pollen (the plant is wind fertilized) seems to get everywhere.

  153. Communism sucks because it's against human nature by I'm+Don+Giovanni · · Score: 1

    Communisim is bad because it goes against human nature, and therefore is doomed to failure in the long run. Therefore, in order to maintain a communist system, one must eventually use force.

    But that's typical of most, if not all, utopian philsophies. You set out to establish a utopia, an ideal system, a man-made paradise where all is good and evil is vanquished. But next thing you know, you find yourself enforcing that utopia at the point of a gun, or are refusing people to leave the utopia after they've become disenchanted. Fortunately, most utopias remain small (cults) so they harm only to the small number of people that were misfortunate enough to join them. Communists, on the other hand, tried to impose their utopia on vast numbers of people, to great harm. It's no accident that during the Cold War, Eastern European countries had much worse living conditions than their Western counterparts, and many Eastern Europeans tried to make it to the West to better their lives, while hardly any Westerners tried to go to the Eastern Bloc. I remember when the Berlin Wall came down, the Eastern Berliners were shocked at how well stocked the Western Berlin stores were with goods.

    Taking this discussion to the main topic, this article is simply another example of Communist government trying to impose a utopia on the citizens.

    --
    -- "I never gave these stories much credence." - HAL 9000
  154. heh, "Communist" by geohump · · Score: 1

    Isn't it interesting that the "reporter" called the government of India's southern state of Kerala: "Communist".

    Hmm - India has a democratic government, perhaps better or worse than our own. (The USA) but not a communist government.

    Hmm.. Is it perhaps possible that AMELIA GENTLEMAN, of the International Herald Tribune has his own agenda?

    I think so. Its shameful to see this kind of obviously biased reporting get into the New York Times.

    Amelia seems upset that the indian government banned Coke and Pesi recently, but Reuters news service says :
    "In a report published earlier this month, environmental group The Centre for Science and Environment (CSE) said it found traces of pesticides far above permissible levels in the products of the two global beverage companies."

    Whats interesting about that? Many schools here in the US are banning Coke and Pepsi too, because the stuffs unhealthy and contributes to the 30% rise in America obesity levels. I guess they're all communists too.

    Another interesting note. According to the article MS sells windows in to schools in India for between $25 and $30 per computer. The Indian ministry of education as 1.86 million dollars to spend on computer technology for 1 million children. Yup, Thats $1.86 per kid. Hey MS ? Can you get that price a down a bit more? You know, like $0? Hmm.. if the OLPC hits its price point ($100) They can buy 180 thousand laptops. Thats almost 1 for every five kids. Maybe the gates foundation has spare money they can help out on this with. For a mere 8.14 million additional they can get an OLPC laptop for the rest of those kids! (yeah, I know, the OLPC isn't down t0 $100 yet. Using $100 makes the math easy... :) )

  155. Re:Boo by vivin · · Score: 1

    They banned it because they say it contained pesticides.

    If you had taken the time to do a quick Google Search you could have got your answer.

    --
    Vivin Suresh Paliath
    http://vivin.net

    I like
  156. Re:Finally! we can really complain about the commi by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

    I believe the Canadian city of Winnipeg had a communist mayor for a long time. I had the choice of voting for the communist party in our last national election (it was REALLY tempting -- talk about a protest vote).

    Communist doesn't really imply totalitarian. In fact, it's kind of odd that the original communist revolutions decided it was necessary to initially have a totalitarian state (which was supposed to be disbanded eventually).

  157. Re:Boo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Why should the government tell me which choices are "wrong"?

    Because part of the job of a government is to protect its citizens. If a tobacco company sets up and starts selling cigarettes to children while paying for adverts and TV programs which depict them as healthy then I certainly want the government to: 1)Tell that company that its choice was wrong and that it better stop, 2)Tell children that their choice is wrong, and 3) tell shopkeepers that their decision to sell cigarettes to children is wrong.

    How would you feel if the government ruled that alchoholic beverages are illegal because they cause people to behave irresponsibly and can cause alcohol poisoning?

    I would love it. I would cheer and laugh and look forward to walking streets after dark without fear of being attacked, and revel in the pleasure of a town which did not smell like a sewer every Saturday and Sunday morning. But then, I don't drink anyway.

    The problem with alcohol is that, unlike Pepsi, the damage is done to those around you. It is done to not only the drunks but to the medical staff who are duty bound to try to treat them even as they lash out at them and puke on them, and to the public property which my taxes paid for, and to basically everyone who has the misfortune to live near a pub or club and have to live with the threats, attacks, public unination, defication, vandalism, theft, rape, and murder which accumulate around them.

    However, prohibition would not really work. I doubt that it would make things worse but it would not make them better either.

  158. Re:Communism sucks because it's against human natu by 99BottlesOfBeerInMyF · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Communisim is bad because it goes against human nature, and therefore is doomed to failure in the long run.

    I strongly disagree. Communism works and has worked for as long as human history can record it. It is not against human nature for multiple people to cooperate for the benefit of all of them.

    Therefore, in order to maintain a communist system, one must eventually use force.

    This is also untrue. One example of communism is the nuclear family. Several people pool their resources and share a home, food, chores, etc. If one wants to leave, there is no reason they need to be forced to stay.

    But that's typical of most, if not all, utopian philsophies. You set out to establish a utopia, an ideal system, a man-made paradise where all is good and evil is vanquished. But next thing you know, you find yourself enforcing that utopia at the point of a gun, or are refusing people to leave the utopia after they've become disenchanted.

    You're making a fatal misjudgment. "Utopian philosophies" don't fail. Extremism fails. Every economy in the world is a blend of capitalism, communism, and socialism. Trying to eradicate any of these is an extreme and is what results in horrific failure, historically.

    Fortunately, most utopias remain small (cults) so they harm only to the small number of people that were misfortunate enough to join them. Communists, on the other hand, tried to impose their utopia on vast numbers of people, to great harm.

    There is nothing harmful about communism and nothing about it that implies it has to impose itself on large numbers of people. Communes have existed for thousands of years and are still chugging along just fine. The problem with communism, is that it becomes less and less effective the larger the communist cell grows. Moreover, since it necessarily concentrates decision making, it is more prone to authoritarian abuse than competitive systems.

    The real discussion is the proper balance of communism, capitalism, and socialism within a given society. Communist cells compete in a capitalist economy against one another and everyone gives some to help those in need. In the US right now, we don't have socialized health care or drug treatment. We don't have progressive inheritance taxes. Our communist cells are mostly family units, although we also have some tightly knit communities in the form of communes, monasteries, and co-ops. The cell size is shrinking as more and more families become single parent affairs and as extended families spread out and break up.

    If you look at the quality of living around the world, it suggests the US has too little socialism, and probably too small of communist cells for optimal efficiency.

    Taking this discussion to the main topic, this article is simply another example of Communist government trying to impose a utopia on the citizens.

    Ummm, how do you figure? These are people with communist leanings, but not working within a communist cell at all. They are a capitalist economy as much as the US is. Communism has absolutely no bearing on this decision at all. Also, they're not imposing anything. They suggested, but did not order the socialized education system to move away from a company that is a monopoly and which removes the advantages of capitalism, they wish to enjoy. To summarize, this was a bunch of people with communist leanings, directing the socialized part of their economy, to move towards more capitalism. A real capitalist would be overjoyed to hear it.

  159. Communism an issue in 2006? by taylormc · · Score: 1

    I find it absolutely amazing that, 17 years after the fall of the Berlin Wall, the word "communist" still constitutes an effective slur in arguments involving US citizens and organizations. Wake up and smell the coffee - Kerala's political leanings are not an issue here: lots of us with very un-Communist political leanings are quite in sympathy with its decision to distance itself from MS' monopolistic practices.

  160. Re:Finally! we can really complain about the commi by phliar · · Score: 1
    To quote from that Wikipedia article,
    With a population of about 30 million, the state is India's most progressed society in terms of education, literacy and health. In fact, Kerala has the highest Physical Quality of Life Index (PQLI) in India and the highest Human Development Index. With highest literacy rate in country, highest life expectancy, least population growth, lowest infant mortality, Kerala has been adopted by the world bodies as the role model for developing countries.
    Spectacular tropical beaches, monsoon storms, and mountains, too.
    --
    Unlimited growth == Cancer.
  161. Re:Boo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    xenophobic, not zenophobic, xenophobic.

  162. Re:Boo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Your lack of understanding in the area of international finance is astounding..

    There are a multitude of reasons for avoiding the Euro like the plague. One, the rules will be bent whenever the members see fit (Italy didn't even come CLOSE to qualifying, Germany ran a deficit that broke the rules)

    With a single currency, the nation loses its ability to regulate regional costs.. If we have a single currency and enter a recession, we don't have the option of devaluing our currency to create a cheaper workforce.. During overheating, we don't have the option to increase the currency to slow things down.. Adjusting interest rates alone to do this without allowing the currency to fluctuate has limited value

  163. Re:Boo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    >Explain why they *banned* coke and pepsi...

    Because the pesticide content (from ground water source) in these products are alarmingly high.

  164. from a communist state? by codemarshall · · Score: 1

    This is the same state that banned sale of Coca Cola?

  165. Communists... by RexRhino · · Score: 1

    Because we all know Communists are againt monopolies!

  166. I'm confused... by ElboRuum · · Score: 1

    My math is a little off today.

    OK, so "Democratic and progressive" = "free software".

    Err... OK...

    Well, let me back up a little and try again:

    "Democratic and progressive" = "Antimonopolistic" = "free software".

    Err... eh, yeah.

    One more try:

    "Democratic and progressive" = "Antimonopolistic" = "Anti Microsoft" = "free software".

    Err... Well, better... but still...

    Maybe its me, but it seems that being Anti-Monopolistic doesn't necessarily mean that you are Anti-Profit, so the leap to "free software" has got me a little confused. I mean, it's not like they're saying their switching to Macs, right? This would be in keeping with their Anti-Monopolistic thing right?

    Sounds to me like they just want free stuff.

    Not that there's anything wrong with that, I'm just saying, the leaps needed clarification. Or maybe they didn't. I dunno. Meh.

  167. Re:Boo by dangitman · · Score: 1
    B. Coke and Pepsi have shown the original pesticide study to be flawed (this is not surprising, because it was run by an interest group that has repeatedly shown itself to have an anti-west slant).

    So, because the group that did the study has anti-west tendencies (or so you say), then the results should be expected to be flawed?

    And because Coca Cola and Pepsi defend their products, then they must be right?

    I'm sorry, but this logic is completely flawed. Why would you trust Coca Cola or Pepsi's word on this matter? Why would a group being "anti-west" change the results of pesticide tests? Either the products in question have pesticides in them, or they do not. Do you have access to samples and tests that allow you to determine the answer to this question?

    A poster upthread said that Coke and Pepsi said that the pesticide was there because of the local water. If this is true, then that means that pesticide is still present in the products, doesn't it? So that would mean the study is not flawed, if pesticide was found.

    --
    ... and then they built the supercollider.
  168. Ironic by AZScotsman · · Score: 1

    What's even worse is that they are depriving themselves of all that WONDERFUL tech support.... At least the Indians would stand a chance of UNDERSTANDING them now.

  169. I can't help being confused by Douglas+Goodall · · Score: 1

    The government of a Communist state, which is a democracy... Wait a minute, which is which. Can they both be true?

  170. Re:Boo by aralin · · Score: 1
    You should understand that the British economy is tightly connected with the US economy. If world would switch from USD to EUR as principal currency, the USD would go in tailspin, taking the US economy down under. With it the UK and rest of Europe would soon follow in decades long recession. It is unfortunatelly in the UK's best interest to keep the USD afloat, which means not joining Eurozone, helping to invade Iraq once it starts trading Oil in EUR and so on.

    I have a tremendous respect for Tony Blair to realize this and take a leadership role, even though I despise the way the situation is handled internationally and the whole Iraq war doesn't sit well with me at all.

    --
    If programs would be read like poetry, most programmers would be Vogons.
  171. Re:Boo by manwal · · Score: 1

    Because it is communism? Having chosen communism doesn't automatically imply not having a choice. There are positive and negative aspects of everything, and there are different kinds of communism.

    But for the sake of not confusing the either-or-community, let's just distinguish between Good Communism and Bad Communism; we could call the former gCommunism, to make it more plausible here on /.

    On the other hand, that would suggest a certain search company, governed only by people with lots of money*, which pays people to play at work, supports censorship, and keeps a huge database of information on everything they manage to put in it - including people and their opinions - is an example of Good Communism.
    </confused sarcasm>

    So I guess you're right, we might just as well call it social-democracy.

    *Probably all of them are amongst the richest 5% in the world.

  172. Re:Boo by 99BottlesOfBeerInMyF · · Score: 1

    And exactly why is being a communist bad?

    Communism isn't "bad." Communism fails when the communist cell size becomes too large because the centralized decision making is subject to the decay of information as it moves upward through layers of authority and because it is more and more subject to abuse by authoritarian elements. These people may have communist leanings, but they are operating in a capitalist economy with socialist elements, with respect to this decision.

    Aside from that it is not a good idea to ban any product. This will just lead faster to more idiots.

    For the coke and Pepsi examples cited here, they were banned automatically, like any other food that does not meet the government standards for not being poison. It is really just a matter of labeling. As for MS products, they were not banned. It was suggested that the socialized education system stop using them, because they are defective as a long term solution.

    About being anti-western, in my point of view being anti-western is actually a good thing...

    Being prejudiced about anything is not a good idea. Products should be evaluated to see what brings the most benefit for the cost. In this instance, the government was simply pointing out certain costs associated with breaking the capitalist model with a monopoly and suggesting to the schools that they avoid those products to avoid the hidden cost to Indian society.

  173. Re:Boo by bhiestand · · Score: 1
    On the contrary, there have been a good many studies that have shown just that; the problem is that there have also been a lot of studies that have shown the opposite. About the best you can say is that the jury is still out on the matter.

    Perhaps that's because it's essentially illegal to research, or even access other scientists' research, the medicinal benefits of marijuana. Not that it matters. We already know alcohol and tobacco are worse than marijuana. The only reason MJ is illegal and alcohol and tobacco are legal is because of the public outcry and outrage that would accompany the banning of our favorite vices. The situation will remain like this because, as part of the indoctrination in our schools, children are taught that marijuana is an evil gateway drug that'll make you into a cocaine-snorting crackwhore who will orally please anyone for some drugs. Hell, when I went to school they tried to force me to sign a pledge that I would never do drugs (to include tobacco and alcohol). They almost managed to stop me from graduating elementary school because I refused to sign such a pledge.

    I also noticed you said "a good many studies" instead of "many good studies". I am highly skeptical of any studies sponsored by the current government which declare marijuana to be a dangerous, evil thing. Unfortunately, we'll never be able to verify their results since nobody is allowed to access them anymore, let alone duplicate their results.
    --
    SWM seeks new sig for a brief fling