I actually saw an old rerun of SNL from the late 70's/early 80's that made fun of this same thing. it was one of their "fake" commercials. It was a razor that had two blades. apparently, 30 years ago, no one could conceive of a razor that had more than one blade on it. here we are years later saying how a razor could never fit 6 blades on the head!
two weeks ago i had forgotten aol even existed... and now they've got their name all over the internet. this comes in the face of big changes there- including giving away email and webservices for free now: http://news.zdnet.com/2100-9588_22-6099072.html
they say any publicity is good publicity, but i'm not so sure if i can agree in this case. this is a desperate attempt for aol to get their name back out there. if aol wasn't doomed before, i think this "stunt" should just about do it for them.
I actually saw an old rerun of SNL from the late 70's/early 80's that made fun of this same thing. it was one of their "fake" commercials. It was a razor that had two blades. apparently, 30 years ago, no one could conceive of a razor that had more than one blade on it. here we are years later saying how a razor could never fit 6 blades on the head!
"USDC for the District of Colorado, (Case No. 06-CV-01368-PSF-MJW)"
! you may be a victim of lawsuit piracy.
Your lawsuit number is not genuine. Authorities are being notified. You will be sued shortly...
two weeks ago i had forgotten aol even existed... and now they've got their name all over the internet. this comes in the face of big changes there- including giving away email and webservices for free now: http://news.zdnet.com/2100-9588_22-6099072.html
they say any publicity is good publicity, but i'm not so sure if i can agree in this case. this is a desperate attempt for aol to get their name back out there. if aol wasn't doomed before, i think this "stunt" should just about do it for them.