So you have to bury your cellphone into your check-in luggages and you cannot use your cellphone to make a phone call for the people waiting outside of the custom to pick you up until you get your check-in luggage back? And if you unfortunately lost your check-in luggage, too bad, you lost your cellphone as well, right?
This is bullshit rule.
Terrorists can always sneak explosives in somewhere when terrorists are boarding. The point is, banning rule does NOT really bring in security. Also, remember in what did those heroin smuggler hide their stuff? They swollow heroin into their stomach or hide it inside the rectum. The banning rule simple doesn't work for those smugglers and suicide bombers. Whatever needs to be checked, we should still check it, double check it instead of banning it.
I understand the situation and DHS has to do something to ensure security. But simply banning stuff that discovered could be a security threat is INSANE! My point is, all the banning rules post 9-11 aren't all neccessary since airport securities are already checking each carray-on luggage fro every passenger, why still ban it if you still check it all? The regular good citizens are gonna be suffered from the inconveniences. I know alive is way better than dead, but I am still not convinced how much more secure but enforcing the banning rules.
I had a weird dream last night that it bothers me that all contact lens are banned during the flight because god damn terrorists are utilizing that as a way to jerpordizing our fligth security. I know it sounds stupid, but you get the idea. Just like someone said from NJ.com forum, 'At this rate by 2010 we will all be flying naked.'
Slashdot Mirror
So you have to bury your cellphone into your check-in luggages and you cannot use your cellphone to make a phone call for the people waiting outside of the custom to pick you up until you get your check-in luggage back? And if you unfortunately lost your check-in luggage, too bad, you lost your cellphone as well, right? This is bullshit rule. Terrorists can always sneak explosives in somewhere when terrorists are boarding. The point is, banning rule does NOT really bring in security. Also, remember in what did those heroin smuggler hide their stuff? They swollow heroin into their stomach or hide it inside the rectum. The banning rule simple doesn't work for those smugglers and suicide bombers. Whatever needs to be checked, we should still check it, double check it instead of banning it.
I understand the situation and DHS has to do something to ensure security. But simply banning stuff that discovered could be a security threat is INSANE! My point is, all the banning rules post 9-11 aren't all neccessary since airport securities are already checking each carray-on luggage fro every passenger, why still ban it if you still check it all? The regular good citizens are gonna be suffered from the inconveniences. I know alive is way better than dead, but I am still not convinced how much more secure but enforcing the banning rules.
I had a weird dream last night that it bothers me that all contact lens are banned during the flight because god damn terrorists are utilizing that as a way to jerpordizing our fligth security. I know it sounds stupid, but you get the idea. Just like someone said from NJ.com forum, 'At this rate by 2010 we will all be flying naked.'