I wouldn't doubt that this "experiment" has some deep rooted feminist agenda. There are a lot of examples where radical feminists have tried to completely discredit men, who also talked about men's rights. Warren Farrell is just one example. In an 1977 issue of Penthouse he was totally misquoted, and made to look like some sort of child molester. I for one am all for equal rights, but "experiments" with flawed methodology like this reek of matriarchal Orwellian society.
"Actually, BOTH companies copied a GUI design that Xerox implemented a full NINE years before the Mac was even concieved."
'Copied' would imply that Xerox never recieved a dime for their software from Apple. In point-of-fact, Apple bought Xerox's GUI software (one million shares of Apple stock was the price if I recall correctly), made significant improvements to it, and then Microsoft copied Apple's design under the guise that they'd like to develop software that would work with Apple's new user interface.
Microsoft blatantly lied so that they could get hold of source code in order to develop their own GUI software (which was nothing more than a simple window manager) to run on top of DOS, better known as 'Windows.' You're correct, Apple did not develop GUI technology, but they didn't steal it like Microsoft either.
Slashdot Mirror
I wouldn't doubt that this "experiment" has some deep rooted feminist agenda. There are a lot of examples where radical feminists have tried to completely discredit men, who also talked about men's rights. Warren Farrell is just one example. In an 1977 issue of Penthouse he was totally misquoted, and made to look like some sort of child molester. I for one am all for equal rights, but "experiments" with flawed methodology like this reek of matriarchal Orwellian society.