Slashdot Mirror


User: BenoitRen

BenoitRen's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
1,511
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 1,511

  1. Re:Are they breaking compatibility for its own sak on Mozilla Mulls Dropping Firefox For Win2K, Early XP · · Score: 1

    Making claims like yours are easy without backing it up. Look through Mozilla's Gecko 1.8 source code. This is exactly how they do it.

  2. Re:Dropping a big selling point! on Mozilla Mulls Dropping Firefox For Win2K, Early XP · · Score: 1

    Session Restore can already be accomplished through extensions. As for CSS3 and some HTML5, that's nice, but you can't use them on actual web pages yet because 1) these aren't W3C Recommendations yet and 2) not all web browsers support them yet.

  3. Re:Are they breaking compatibility for its own sak on Mozilla Mulls Dropping Firefox For Win2K, Early XP · · Score: 1

    Supporting it also means crippling any software that wants to use APIs that later versions of the platform supports.

    No.

    First, he already said that the API between Windows 2000 and Windows XP is identical.

    Secondly, you can test for an API at runtime, check for a possible error or null pointer, and then decide what to execute. It's that simple, and requires no crippling at all.

  4. Re:Dropping a big selling point! on Mozilla Mulls Dropping Firefox For Win2K, Early XP · · Score: 1

    Oh no! It doesn't have the new shiny Cairo-powered rendering engine and the Add-Ons Manager! It sucks!

    I don't care one bit when 1.1.x came out. It works, works well, and doesn't really need an Add-Ons Manager because it comes with so many things you barely need any extensions. As for SeaMonkey 2.0 dropping support for Win9x, this was not a decision by the SeaMonkey Council. It's just how it goes when you base a web browser on Gecko 1.9.

    Damn whipper-snappers who always need the new toys!

  5. Re:Dropping a big selling point! on Mozilla Mulls Dropping Firefox For Win2K, Early XP · · Score: 1

    Or maybe they stayed with Windows 2000 because it was pretty identical to Windows XP API-wise, does not need activation, and Just Works.

  6. Re:Dropping a big selling point! on Mozilla Mulls Dropping Firefox For Win2K, Early XP · · Score: 1

    Barely any resources have to be invested to keep it running. Remember, this is open source, and this is Mozilla, who has an entire framework in place to minimize OS-specific code. As for older versions, that doesn't cut it, as they are no longer up-to-date with security. For a web browser, this is critical.

  7. Re:Dropping a big selling point! on Mozilla Mulls Dropping Firefox For Win2K, Early XP · · Score: 1

    Firefox 3.0 doesn't work on Win9x. 2.0 already didn't work properly on Windows 95 thanks to a weird bug caused by some JavaScript.

    These few people that don't want to upgrade are not holding anyone back. Sheesh. People imagine that everything needs to stand still to work on backwards compatibility.

  8. Re:Dropping a big selling point! on Mozilla Mulls Dropping Firefox For Win2K, Early XP · · Score: 1

    Yes, because the developers adding features are the same ones that maintain OS-specific source code! (/sarcasm)

  9. Re:Than don't upgrade on Mozilla Mulls Dropping Firefox For Win2K, Early XP · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Too bad not upgrading is not really an option with a web browser. You have to keep up with security updates.

  10. Re:forcing users to upgrade on Mozilla Mulls Dropping Firefox For Win2K, Early XP · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I'll tell you why: because Windows doesn't change the API of a major component every 5 years or so.

  11. Re:Interesting on Disassembling the US Nintendo DSi · · Score: 4, Insightful

    That's not a good comparison, as the Game Boy Advance was wildly different in capabilities from the Game Boy Color. Meanwhile the DS, DS Lite and DSi are essentially the same system.

  12. Re:The Only Change You Can Believe In on Obama Administration Defends Warrantless Wiretapping · · Score: 1
  13. Re:Of course! They're connected to teh intertubes on Microsoft Warns of Copycat Conficker Worm · · Score: 1

    They only give a damn about security issues that are public. Unknown ones they just sit on, as has been demonstrated several times with vulnerabilities like the Windows meta file one.

  14. Re:Of course! They're connected to teh intertubes on Microsoft Warns of Copycat Conficker Worm · · Score: 1

    I hope you're not trying to imply that it's impossible to be safe on Windows without anti-virus. Being careful about where you browse is stupid, as any site can get hacked to spread malware.

    Using common sense, like not blindly opening attachments, being behind a NAT router and/or firewall and using a web browser that isn't IE that gets updated regularly goes a long way towards being malware-free. You can go even further and implement a whitelist for programs (instead of the anti-virus blacklist, which is one of the most dumb security practices).

    Security is a process, not a product.

  15. Re:Uh oh on Microsoft Warns of Copycat Conficker Worm · · Score: 1
  16. Re:Take that! :-) on Instant Messaging Vulnerable To New Smiley Attacks · · Score: 1

    Oh, right. My bad. Damn smilies.

  17. Re:Take that! :-) on Instant Messaging Vulnerable To New Smiley Attacks · · Score: 1

    inf:-)ect:-)ion's

    Looks like your grammar was infected as well.

  18. Re:Extensions are not plugins on IE 8.1 Supports Firefox Plugins, Rendering Engine · · Score: 2, Informative

    Extensions are often cross-browser too. But they still all depend on Gecko in the Mozilla world.

  19. Re:Wait...what? on IE 8.1 Supports Firefox Plugins, Rendering Engine · · Score: 1

    That's not something the dominant browser does, that's something that a low-share browser does to help with compatibility, ala Netscape 7.

    I think you mean Netscape 8. That's the one that embeds both Trident and Gecko.

  20. Re:little bit early on the 04/01 on IE 8.1 Supports Firefox Plugins, Rendering Engine · · Score: 1

    I am in Europe, and it's not 1 April here yet either.

  21. Re:am i missing something? on Game Companies Face Hard Economic Choices · · Score: 1

    That third-party titles for the Wii don't sell well is a myth:

    Sega's Mario & Sonic at the Olympic Games - 6.93 million
    Sega's Sonic and the Secret Rings - 2.02 million
    Activision's Guitar Hero III: Legends of Rock - 4.10 million
    Activision's Guitar Hero: World Tour - 2.63 million
    Global Star's Carnival Games - 3.19 million
    LucasArts' Lego Star Wars: The Complete Saga - 2.24 million
    LucasArts' Lego Indiana Jones: The Original Adventures - 1.13 million
    LucasArts' Star Wars: The Force Unleashed - 1.21 million
    Midway's Game Party - 1.94 million
    Hudson's Deca Sports - 1.72 million
    Capcom's Resident Evil 4: Wii Edition - 1.66 million
    Capcom's Resident Evil: The Umbrella Chronicles 1.26 million
    Ubisoft's Rayman Raving Rabbids - 1.5 million
    Ubisoft's Rayman Raving Rabbids 2 - 1.62 million
    Ubisoft's Rayman Raving Rabbids: TV Party - 1.28 million
    Ubisoft's Red Steel - 1.09 million
    Ubisoft's Shaun White Snowboarding: Road Trip - 1.03 million
    EA's MySims - 1.42 million
    EA's Rock Band - 1.28 million
    EA's Smarty Pants - 1.23 million
    Disney's High School Musical: Sing It! - 1.38 million
    Namco Bandai's We Ski - 1.33 million
    THQ's Big Beach Sports - 1.17 million
    Majesco's Cooking Mama: Cook Off - 1.10 million

    Even more numbers:
    http://platformers.net/2009/02/npd-january-2009-life-to-date-numbers/

  22. Re:Wow! on Taming Conficker, the Easy Way · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Actually, most infections today occur thanks to social engineering. The biggest liability is still what's between the keyboard and the chair.

  23. Re:what happened to firefox being a bare bones bas on Command Lines and the Future of Firefox · · Score: 1

    That's a popular myth. The road map for the Firefox project has always been to create the best Windows web browser for end-users with the "right features".

  24. Re:Firefox Redux? on Command Lines and the Future of Firefox · · Score: 1

    The Mozilla Suite was never bloated. Some people just didn't like the way things were going, and created the Phoenix project. It caught on, because it was new and shiny.

    People who wanted "just a browser" could already have it. Just choose "Browser only" at installation time. The option is still there in SeaMonkey 1.1.x.

  25. Re:So how long before... on Command Lines and the Future of Firefox · · Score: 1

    The Mozilla Corporation is for-profit, and it already receives loads of money from Google just for giving it preferential treatment and using it on the Firefox start page.