Good. Then I'll complain about censorship now, instead. Fuck the port authority. He's (allegedly) being held in Port Authority custody. Great. Those people at the Port Authority who are responsible for this should be sent to jail for kidnapping.
or does that seem weirdly contradictory? I mean, if Bob kidnaps someone and holds him in a cell for four hours, is it wrong to kidnap Bob and hold him in a cell to show him that kidnapping people and holding them in a cell is wrong? What if Tom kidnaps Bob and holds him in a cell for four hours to show Bob that it's wrong to kidnap? Is it OK then for some nebulous entity like "the police force" or "the government" or "the port authority" to kidnap Tom AND Bob and hold them both for a few hours to teach them the lesson? Should someone then kidnap "the police force" to show how wrong kidnapping is? What if Tom WAS the a police officer? Does that make his actions right, then? Does the fact that some judge ordered a Tom to kidnap someone absolve Tom of kidnapping? Is the judge now the kidnapper, or Tom? What if it wasn't a real judge, just somebody who liked to call himself a judge, or somebody who plays a judge on TV. and what is Judge Nelson up to nowaways, anyway? Judge Nelson, no it's Judd Nelson, right? Yeah, he was in that movie with that black guy and that white guy and Jeff Goldblum and the aliens, wasn't he? What was that called? Oh yeah, Independence Day. Anyway, what was I talking about?
Sorry, ADHD.
just a bullshit yarn that anyone with training in HR, management, or the law can see is exagerrated or made up entirely
How can you tell? I'd REALLY like to know, because my bullshit detector didn't quite go off on that one, and I'm usually pretty good about it.
That is to say, I agree with you, snowwrestler, but I don't know why -- though I don't have training in HR,mgmt,etc., so maybe I'm just not familiar with those kinds of lies.
Can you (or anyone who reads this) tell me what cues this AC gives off to make you think that he's a lying putz?
Slashdot Mirror
Good. Then I'll complain about censorship now, instead. Fuck the port authority. He's (allegedly) being held in Port Authority custody. Great. Those people at the Port Authority who are responsible for this should be sent to jail for kidnapping. or does that seem weirdly contradictory? I mean, if Bob kidnaps someone and holds him in a cell for four hours, is it wrong to kidnap Bob and hold him in a cell to show him that kidnapping people and holding them in a cell is wrong? What if Tom kidnaps Bob and holds him in a cell for four hours to show Bob that it's wrong to kidnap? Is it OK then for some nebulous entity like "the police force" or "the government" or "the port authority" to kidnap Tom AND Bob and hold them both for a few hours to teach them the lesson? Should someone then kidnap "the police force" to show how wrong kidnapping is? What if Tom WAS the a police officer? Does that make his actions right, then? Does the fact that some judge ordered a Tom to kidnap someone absolve Tom of kidnapping? Is the judge now the kidnapper, or Tom? What if it wasn't a real judge, just somebody who liked to call himself a judge, or somebody who plays a judge on TV. and what is Judge Nelson up to nowaways, anyway? Judge Nelson, no it's Judd Nelson, right? Yeah, he was in that movie with that black guy and that white guy and Jeff Goldblum and the aliens, wasn't he? What was that called? Oh yeah, Independence Day. Anyway, what was I talking about? Sorry, ADHD.
How can you tell? I'd REALLY like to know, because my bullshit detector didn't quite go off on that one, and I'm usually pretty good about it. That is to say, I agree with you, snowwrestler, but I don't know why -- though I don't have training in HR,mgmt,etc., so maybe I'm just not familiar with those kinds of lies. Can you (or anyone who reads this) tell me what cues this AC gives off to make you think that he's a lying putz?