you're the one implying i was incorrect... i'm the one proving that the only person incorrect is you. if you find such factual evidence condescending, that should tell you something.
if a minimal processing time can be defined, and a maximum compression ration can be defined, then "optimal" is not subjective.
when "this vendor" = amazon.com, and amazon.com serves as an intermediary for nearly EVERY 3rd party vendor, then it's fairly ignorant and hypocritical to call the data "useless" when it alone can be used to process new charges nearly ubiquitously.
if anything, there is more to do... but continue with the excuses you use to justify your inactivity.
define the decoder as such: if the bit is 0, the coding will render nothing. if the bit is 1, the coding will render your post.
it's more than easy. it's trivial.
you're an idiot.
if a minimal processing time can be defined, and a maximum compression ration can be defined, then "optimal" is not subjective.
you're an idiot.
why do you cower? what are you afraid of?
you're completely pathetic.
when "this vendor" = amazon.com, and amazon.com serves as an intermediary for nearly EVERY 3rd party vendor, then it's fairly ignorant and hypocritical to call the data "useless" when it alone can be used to process new charges nearly ubiquitously.
it's painfully obvious you have ulterior motives and no moral worth whatsoever.
you fantasize and accuse others with no evidence of being raped by religious figures and brutalizing women and children.
you are a completely pathetic individual, and justice will find you.
why do you cower behind a chosen urine based pseudonym? what are you afraid of?
you're completely pathetic.
present yourself to me; admit what you've done, then i'll bring upon you the ultimate punishment for your transgressions.
if amazon.com doesn't store card data, then how am i allowed to make purchases using existing saved card data?
why do you cower? what are you afraid of?
you're completely pathetic.
why do you cower behind a chosen pseudonym? what are you afraid of?
you're completely pathetic.