Domain: 74.125.47.132
Stories and comments across the archive that link to 74.125.47.132.
Comments · 117
-
Ken Richmond of NASDAQ, & AVAILABILITY proof
NASDAQ
Spokesperson: Ken Richmond, Vice President of Software Engineering
Situation:Largest U.S. electronic stock market
Replacing aging Tandem systems
Wanted to update system for real-time trade summary, risk management and broker clearingSolution:
MDDS: Market Data Dissemination System
5K txs/second, 100K queries/day
Running on SQL Server 2005 with database mirroring for high availabilityBenefits:
Enterprise availability
Scalability to handle 8 million new rows of data per day
Lower total cost of ownership
Real-time reporting
Developer agilityKEYWORD, LISTED AS A BENEFIT NO LESS, is "Enterprise Availability", by Ken Richmond of NASDAQ no less (who also was quoted as saying Windows Server 2003 + SQLServer 2005 did the job for NASDAQ PERFECTLY)
WIKIPEDIA "HIGH AVAILABILITY" DEFINITION PAGE (which lists 99.999% no less) -> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High_availability
Need more?
"ENTERPRISE AVAILABILITY"/"HIGH AVAILABILITY" definitions (from various sources):
"for the high availability enterprise servers (99.999% availability)" -> http://www.linkedin.com/pub/omar-gadir/8/162/219
"Device techniques for high availability For years, enterprise network equipment providers strived to deliver 99.999% availability which is the standard major telecommunications companies deliver. This type of reliability is desirable and it s expected when it comes to phone service. If enterprise networks are to support IP phones, they too must deliver similar availability" -> http://74.125.47.132/search?q=cache:kMTHFHnbIpwJ:www.alcatel-lucentbusinessportal.com/support/includes/doclink.cfm%3Fid%3D7369+%22Enterprise+Availability%22+and+%2299.999%25%22&cd=1&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us
"IT managers insist their enterprise management software must be made highly available when its task is to manage highly available services. They ask, "How can I accurately measure service levels in the 99.999% range with IT management tools" -> http://www.fognet.com/HAOV-inforum.html
(OH, I think THAT will do, for now... lol!)
APK
P.S.=> What did Ken Richmond LIST as a benefit up in his list, SpRoCkEt? And, while you are @ it SPROCKET??
Please, DO define the word "PERFECTLY" for us, won't you? Quit avoiding that, as you have constantly here, especially in regards to Mr. Richmond's statement here:
----
"We saw an early demonstration of Snapshot Isolation and knew this was the solution we needed to run queries against real-time data without slowing the delivery of trading data. It has worked perfectly for us" - Ken Richmond, vice president for software engineering, market information systems at NASDAQ.
----
LMAO - this is FUN, watching this "monkey boy" named "SpRoCkEt" dance, for all the b.s. he has given us dealing with him... by the by? My post?? Back @ +4 INFORMATIVE again (someone is liking what I put out vs. your crap SPROCKET), & it's back on the "FRONT PAGE" here on this site, once more (go! quick!! Get 1 of your "sock puppet" accounts & mod it down again, Sprocket... lol!)... apk
-
Ken Richmond of NASDAQ, & AVAILABILITY proof
NASDAQ
Spokesperson: Ken Richmond, Vice President of Software Engineering
Situation:Largest U.S. electronic stock market
Replacing aging Tandem systems
Wanted to update system for real-time trade summary, risk management and broker clearingSolution:
MDDS: Market Data Dissemination System
5K txs/second, 100K queries/day
Running on SQL Server 2005 with database mirroring for high availabilityBenefits:
Enterprise availability
Scalability to handle 8 million new rows of data per day
Lower total cost of ownership
Real-time reporting
Developer agilityKEYWORD, LISTED AS A BENEFIT NO LESS, is "Enterprise Availability", by Ken Richmond of NASDAQ no less (who also was quoted as saying Windows Server 2003 + SQLServer 2005 did the job for NASDAQ PERFECTLY)
WIKIPEDIA "HIGH AVAILABILITY" DEFINITION PAGE (which lists 99.999% no less) -> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High_availability
Need more?
"ENTERPRISE AVAILABILITY"/"HIGH AVAILABILITY" definitions (from various sources):
"for the high availability enterprise servers (99.999% availability)" -> http://www.linkedin.com/pub/omar-gadir/8/162/219
"Device techniques for high availability For years, enterprise network equipment providers strived to deliver 99.999% availability which is the standard major telecommunications companies deliver. This type of reliability is desirable and it s expected when it comes to phone service. If enterprise networks are to support IP phones, they too must deliver similar availability" -> http://74.125.47.132/search?q=cache:kMTHFHnbIpwJ:www.alcatel-lucentbusinessportal.com/support/includes/doclink.cfm%3Fid%3D7369+%22Enterprise+Availability%22+and+%2299.999%25%22&cd=1&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us
"IT managers insist their enterprise management software must be made highly available when its task is to manage highly available services. They ask, "How can I accurately measure service levels in the 99.999% range with IT management tools" -> http://www.fognet.com/HAOV-inforum.html
(OH, I think THAT will do, for now... lol!)
APK
P.S.=> What did Ken Richmond LIST as a benefit up in his list, SpRoCkEt? And, while you are @ it SPROCKET??
Please, DO define the word "PERFECTLY" for us, won't you? Quit avoiding that, as you have constantly here, especially in regards to Mr. Richmond's statement here:
----
"We saw an early demonstration of Snapshot Isolation and knew this was the solution we needed to run queries against real-time data without slowing the delivery of trading data. It has worked perfectly for us" - Ken Richmond, vice president for software engineering, market information systems at NASDAQ.
----
LMAO - this is FUN, watching this "monkey boy" named "SpRoCkEt" dance, for all the b.s. he has given us dealing with him... by the by? My post?? Back @ +4 INFORMATIVE again (someone is liking what I put out vs. your crap SPROCKET), & it's back on the "FRONT PAGE" here on this site, once more (go! quick!! Get 1 of your "sock puppet" accounts & mod it down again, Sprocket... lol!)... apk
-
Eat your words k10quant, you troll (see inside)...
"The marketing was clever enough to fool anyone who would believe Windows can have that sort of performance and uptime
;)" - by k10quaint (1344115)
on Friday July 03, @01:27PM (#28573263)Hey, wiseguy: Take a read, especially in regards to your IGNORANT comment I quoted above...
For Sprocket ( the troll himself ), k10quant, cbiltcliffe & the A/C one most of all, time to "eat your words", wiseguys:
----
FUJIFILM = 99.999% uptime on SQLServer 2005:
"This is a mission-critical project, which needs to keep running on 99.999 percent availability. Stoppages are just not acceptable. SQL Server 2005 gives us the reliability we require." - Michito Watanabe, President and Managing Director, Fujifilm Computer System Company
----
XEROX = 99.999% uptime on SQLServer 2005:
http://www.microsoft.com/casestudies/Case_Study_Detail.aspx?CaseStudyID=49133
"SQL Server 2005 is mission critical to the Xerox Office Services application. To achieve the 99.999 percent uptime required by the application, we rely on SQL Server 2005 clustering capabilities." - Kirk Pothos Software Development Manager, Xerox Global Services
----
ANTHONY MARANO COMPANY = 99.999% uptime on SQLServer 2005:
http://www.cwhonors.org/viewCaseStudy2008.asp?NominationID=789
"By migrating to the Fujitsu platform, Anthony Marano has gone from 95 percent system availability to 99.999 percent availability"
----
MEDITERRANEAN SHIPPING COMPANY: = 99.999% uptime on SQLServer:
"MSCLinkis anapplication that must be available without fail24hours-a-day,seven day seachweek, and 365 days a year",says Catassi. "WithSQLServer 2005 weve
enjoyed 99.999 percentavailability"----
AND, LAST BUT NOT LEAST? NASDAQ EVIDENCE (finally) of 99.999% uptime (for MDDS):
Trusted Platform Market Data Dissemination System
5K txs / second, 100K queries / day, running on SQL Server 2005
Fixed Income Trade and Positioning
System running on SQL Server 2005
30% performance increase,
capacity to process 1,000 trades / second5TB of data on SQL Server 2005
99.999% uptime, scalability for 30% annual growthAND, Here is a rating of "does the job PERFECTLY" by Ken Richmond, the guy who RUNS THE SHOW IN IS/IT @ NASDAQ FOR YOUR FURTHER REFERENCE (& perfect? MEANS PERFECT - 99.999%
-
Eat your words k10quant, you troll (see inside)...
"The marketing was clever enough to fool anyone who would believe Windows can have that sort of performance and uptime
;)" - by k10quaint (1344115)
on Friday July 03, @01:27PM (#28573263)Hey, wiseguy: Take a read, especially in regards to your IGNORANT comment I quoted above...
For Sprocket ( the troll himself ), k10quant, cbiltcliffe & the A/C one most of all, time to "eat your words", wiseguys:
----
FUJIFILM = 99.999% uptime on SQLServer 2005:
"This is a mission-critical project, which needs to keep running on 99.999 percent availability. Stoppages are just not acceptable. SQL Server 2005 gives us the reliability we require." - Michito Watanabe, President and Managing Director, Fujifilm Computer System Company
----
XEROX = 99.999% uptime on SQLServer 2005:
http://www.microsoft.com/casestudies/Case_Study_Detail.aspx?CaseStudyID=49133
"SQL Server 2005 is mission critical to the Xerox Office Services application. To achieve the 99.999 percent uptime required by the application, we rely on SQL Server 2005 clustering capabilities." - Kirk Pothos Software Development Manager, Xerox Global Services
----
ANTHONY MARANO COMPANY = 99.999% uptime on SQLServer 2005:
http://www.cwhonors.org/viewCaseStudy2008.asp?NominationID=789
"By migrating to the Fujitsu platform, Anthony Marano has gone from 95 percent system availability to 99.999 percent availability"
----
MEDITERRANEAN SHIPPING COMPANY: = 99.999% uptime on SQLServer:
"MSCLinkis anapplication that must be available without fail24hours-a-day,seven day seachweek, and 365 days a year",says Catassi. "WithSQLServer 2005 weve
enjoyed 99.999 percentavailability"----
AND, LAST BUT NOT LEAST? NASDAQ EVIDENCE (finally) of 99.999% uptime (for MDDS):
Trusted Platform Market Data Dissemination System
5K txs / second, 100K queries / day, running on SQL Server 2005
Fixed Income Trade and Positioning
System running on SQL Server 2005
30% performance increase,
capacity to process 1,000 trades / second5TB of data on SQL Server 2005
99.999% uptime, scalability for 30% annual growthAND, Here is a rating of "does the job PERFECTLY" by Ken Richmond, the guy who RUNS THE SHOW IN IS/IT @ NASDAQ FOR YOUR FURTHER REFERENCE (& perfect? MEANS PERFECT - 99.999%
-
Eat your words k10quant, you troll (see inside)...
"The marketing was clever enough to fool anyone who would believe Windows can have that sort of performance and uptime
;)" - by k10quaint (1344115)
on Friday July 03, @01:27PM (#28573263)Hey, wiseguy: Take a read, especially in regards to your IGNORANT comment I quoted above...
For Sprocket ( the troll himself ), k10quant, cbiltcliffe & the A/C one most of all, time to "eat your words", wiseguys:
----
FUJIFILM = 99.999% uptime on SQLServer 2005:
"This is a mission-critical project, which needs to keep running on 99.999 percent availability. Stoppages are just not acceptable. SQL Server 2005 gives us the reliability we require." - Michito Watanabe, President and Managing Director, Fujifilm Computer System Company
----
XEROX = 99.999% uptime on SQLServer 2005:
http://www.microsoft.com/casestudies/Case_Study_Detail.aspx?CaseStudyID=49133
"SQL Server 2005 is mission critical to the Xerox Office Services application. To achieve the 99.999 percent uptime required by the application, we rely on SQL Server 2005 clustering capabilities." - Kirk Pothos Software Development Manager, Xerox Global Services
----
ANTHONY MARANO COMPANY = 99.999% uptime on SQLServer 2005:
http://www.cwhonors.org/viewCaseStudy2008.asp?NominationID=789
"By migrating to the Fujitsu platform, Anthony Marano has gone from 95 percent system availability to 99.999 percent availability"
----
MEDITERRANEAN SHIPPING COMPANY: = 99.999% uptime on SQLServer:
"MSCLinkis anapplication that must be available without fail24hours-a-day,seven day seachweek, and 365 days a year",says Catassi. "WithSQLServer 2005 weve
enjoyed 99.999 percentavailability"----
AND, LAST BUT NOT LEAST? NASDAQ EVIDENCE (finally) of 99.999% uptime (for MDDS):
Trusted Platform Market Data Dissemination System
5K txs / second, 100K queries / day, running on SQL Server 2005
Fixed Income Trade and Positioning
System running on SQL Server 2005
30% performance increase,
capacity to process 1,000 trades / second5TB of data on SQL Server 2005
99.999% uptime, scalability for 30% annual growthAND, Here is a rating of "does the job PERFECTLY" by Ken Richmond, the guy who RUNS THE SHOW IN IS/IT @ NASDAQ FOR YOUR FURTHER REFERENCE (& perfect? MEANS PERFECT - 99.999%
-
Apologies - but, 99.999% uptime evidence inside...
I was in a hurry, so, on not posting fully? I admit that, & apologize... but, that "good stuff" I was noting in my subject-line above? Here tis!
Mod me a "troll", all you like boys!
That doesn't DO "too well", vs. some proofs/evidences, especially of companies (with larger "tpm"/transaction-per-minute or per day than NASDAQ even has etc. et al, no less) that are doing GREAT using Windows Server 2003 + SQLServer 2005:
----
FUJIFILM = 99.999% uptime on SQLServer 2005:
"This is a mission-critical project, which needs to keep running on 99.999 percent availability. Stoppages are just not acceptable. SQL Server 2005 gives us the reliability we require." - Michito Watanabe, President and Managing Director, Fujifilm Computer System Company
----
XEROX = 99.999% uptime on SQLServer 2005:
http://www.microsoft.com/casestudies/Case_Study_Detail.aspx?CaseStudyID=49133
"SQL Server 2005 is mission critical to the Xerox Office Services application. To achieve the 99.999 percent uptime required by the application, we rely on SQL Server 2005 clustering capabilities." - Kirk Pothos Software Development Manager, Xerox Global Services
----
ANTHONY MARANO COMPANY = 99.999% uptime on SQLServer 2005:
http://www.cwhonors.org/viewCaseStudy2008.asp?NominationID=789
"By migrating to the Fujitsu platform, Anthony Marano has gone from 95 percent system availability to 99.999 percent availability"
----
MEDITERRANEAN SHIPPING COMPANY: = 99.999% uptime on SQLServer:
"MSCLinkis anapplication that must be available without fail24hours-a-day,seven day seachweek, and 365 days a year",says Catassi. "WithSQLServer 2005 weve
enjoyed 99.999 percentavailability"----
AND, LAST BUT NOT LEAST? NASDAQ EVIDENCE (finally) of 99.999% uptime (for MDDS):
Trusted Platform Market Data Dissemination System
5K txs / second, 100K queries / day, running on SQL Server 2005
Fixed Income Trade and Positioning
System running on SQL Server 2005
30% performance increase,capacity to process 1,000 trades / second5TB of data on SQL Server 2005
99.999% uptime, scalability for 30% annual growthAND, Here is a rating of "does the job PERFECTLY" by Ken Richmond, the guy who RUNS THE SHOW IN IS/IT @ NASDAQ FOR YOUR FURTHER REFERENCE (& perfect? MEANS PERFECT - 99.999% uptime):
----
"The move from larg
-
Apologies - but, 99.999% uptime evidence inside...
I was in a hurry, so, on not posting fully? I admit that, & apologize... but, that "good stuff" I was noting in my subject-line above? Here tis!
Mod me a "troll", all you like boys!
That doesn't DO "too well", vs. some proofs/evidences, especially of companies (with larger "tpm"/transaction-per-minute or per day than NASDAQ even has etc. et al, no less) that are doing GREAT using Windows Server 2003 + SQLServer 2005:
----
FUJIFILM = 99.999% uptime on SQLServer 2005:
"This is a mission-critical project, which needs to keep running on 99.999 percent availability. Stoppages are just not acceptable. SQL Server 2005 gives us the reliability we require." - Michito Watanabe, President and Managing Director, Fujifilm Computer System Company
----
XEROX = 99.999% uptime on SQLServer 2005:
http://www.microsoft.com/casestudies/Case_Study_Detail.aspx?CaseStudyID=49133
"SQL Server 2005 is mission critical to the Xerox Office Services application. To achieve the 99.999 percent uptime required by the application, we rely on SQL Server 2005 clustering capabilities." - Kirk Pothos Software Development Manager, Xerox Global Services
----
ANTHONY MARANO COMPANY = 99.999% uptime on SQLServer 2005:
http://www.cwhonors.org/viewCaseStudy2008.asp?NominationID=789
"By migrating to the Fujitsu platform, Anthony Marano has gone from 95 percent system availability to 99.999 percent availability"
----
MEDITERRANEAN SHIPPING COMPANY: = 99.999% uptime on SQLServer:
"MSCLinkis anapplication that must be available without fail24hours-a-day,seven day seachweek, and 365 days a year",says Catassi. "WithSQLServer 2005 weve
enjoyed 99.999 percentavailability"----
AND, LAST BUT NOT LEAST? NASDAQ EVIDENCE (finally) of 99.999% uptime (for MDDS):
Trusted Platform Market Data Dissemination System
5K txs / second, 100K queries / day, running on SQL Server 2005
Fixed Income Trade and Positioning
System running on SQL Server 2005
30% performance increase,capacity to process 1,000 trades / second5TB of data on SQL Server 2005
99.999% uptime, scalability for 30% annual growthAND, Here is a rating of "does the job PERFECTLY" by Ken Richmond, the guy who RUNS THE SHOW IN IS/IT @ NASDAQ FOR YOUR FURTHER REFERENCE (& perfect? MEANS PERFECT - 99.999% uptime):
----
"The move from larg
-
Apologies - but, 99.999% uptime evidence inside...
I was in a hurry, so, on not posting fully? I admit that, & apologize... but, that "good stuff" I was noting in my subject-line above? Here tis!
Mod me a "troll", all you like boys!
That doesn't DO "too well", vs. some proofs/evidences, especially of companies (with larger "tpm"/transaction-per-minute or per day than NASDAQ even has etc. et al, no less) that are doing GREAT using Windows Server 2003 + SQLServer 2005:
----
FUJIFILM = 99.999% uptime on SQLServer 2005:
"This is a mission-critical project, which needs to keep running on 99.999 percent availability. Stoppages are just not acceptable. SQL Server 2005 gives us the reliability we require." - Michito Watanabe, President and Managing Director, Fujifilm Computer System Company
----
XEROX = 99.999% uptime on SQLServer 2005:
http://www.microsoft.com/casestudies/Case_Study_Detail.aspx?CaseStudyID=49133
"SQL Server 2005 is mission critical to the Xerox Office Services application. To achieve the 99.999 percent uptime required by the application, we rely on SQL Server 2005 clustering capabilities." - Kirk Pothos Software Development Manager, Xerox Global Services
----
ANTHONY MARANO COMPANY = 99.999% uptime on SQLServer 2005:
http://www.cwhonors.org/viewCaseStudy2008.asp?NominationID=789
"By migrating to the Fujitsu platform, Anthony Marano has gone from 95 percent system availability to 99.999 percent availability"
----
MEDITERRANEAN SHIPPING COMPANY: = 99.999% uptime on SQLServer:
"MSCLinkis anapplication that must be available without fail24hours-a-day,seven day seachweek, and 365 days a year",says Catassi. "WithSQLServer 2005 weve
enjoyed 99.999 percentavailability"----
AND, LAST BUT NOT LEAST? NASDAQ EVIDENCE (finally) of 99.999% uptime (for MDDS):
Trusted Platform Market Data Dissemination System
5K txs / second, 100K queries / day, running on SQL Server 2005
Fixed Income Trade and Positioning
System running on SQL Server 2005
30% performance increase,capacity to process 1,000 trades / second5TB of data on SQL Server 2005
99.999% uptime, scalability for 30% annual growthAND, Here is a rating of "does the job PERFECTLY" by Ken Richmond, the guy who RUNS THE SHOW IN IS/IT @ NASDAQ FOR YOUR FURTHER REFERENCE (& perfect? MEANS PERFECT - 99.999% uptime):
----
"The move from larg
-
k10quant, you troll: Prepare to EAT YOUR WORDS!
"The marketing was clever enough to fool anyone who would believe Windows can have that sort of performance and uptime
;)" - by k10quaint (1344115)
on Friday July 03, @01:27PM (#28573263)Hey, wiseguy: Take a read, especially in regards to your IGNORANT comment I quoted above...
For Sprocket ( the troll himself ), k10quant, cbiltcliffe & the A/C one most of all, time to "eat your words", wiseguys:
----
FUJIFILM = 99.999% uptime on SQLServer 2005:
"This is a mission-critical project, which needs to keep running on 99.999 percent availability. Stoppages are just not acceptable. SQL Server 2005 gives us the reliability we require." - Michito Watanabe, President and Managing Director, Fujifilm Computer System Company
----
XEROX = 99.999% uptime on SQLServer 2005:
http://www.microsoft.com/casestudies/Case_Study_Detail.aspx?CaseStudyID=49133
"SQL Server 2005 is mission critical to the Xerox Office Services application. To achieve the 99.999 percent uptime required by the application, we rely on SQL Server 2005 clustering capabilities." - Kirk Pothos Software Development Manager, Xerox Global Services
----
ANTHONY MARANO COMPANY = 99.999% uptime on SQLServer 2005:
http://www.cwhonors.org/viewCaseStudy2008.asp?NominationID=789
"By migrating to the Fujitsu platform, Anthony Marano has gone from 95 percent system availability to 99.999 percent availability"
----
MEDITERRANEAN SHIPPING COMPANY: = 99.999% uptime on SQLServer:
"MSCLinkis anapplication that must be available without fail24hours-a-day,seven day seachweek, and 365 days a year",says Catassi. "WithSQLServer 2005 weve
enjoyed 99.999 percentavailability"----
AND, LAST BUT NOT LEAST? NASDAQ EVIDENCE (finally) of 99.999% uptime (for MDDS):
Trusted Platform Market Data Dissemination System
5K txs / second, 100K queries / day, running on SQL Server 2005
Fixed Income Trade and Positioning
System running on SQL Server 2005
30% performance increase,
capacity to process 1,000 trades / second5TB of data on SQL Server 2005
99.999% uptime, scalability for 30% annual growthAND, Here is a rating of "does the job PERFECTLY" by Ken Richmond, the guy who RUNS THE SHOW IN IS/IT @ NASDAQ FOR YOUR FURTHER REFERENCE (& perfect? MEANS PERFECT - 99.999%
-
k10quant, you troll: Prepare to EAT YOUR WORDS!
"The marketing was clever enough to fool anyone who would believe Windows can have that sort of performance and uptime
;)" - by k10quaint (1344115)
on Friday July 03, @01:27PM (#28573263)Hey, wiseguy: Take a read, especially in regards to your IGNORANT comment I quoted above...
For Sprocket ( the troll himself ), k10quant, cbiltcliffe & the A/C one most of all, time to "eat your words", wiseguys:
----
FUJIFILM = 99.999% uptime on SQLServer 2005:
"This is a mission-critical project, which needs to keep running on 99.999 percent availability. Stoppages are just not acceptable. SQL Server 2005 gives us the reliability we require." - Michito Watanabe, President and Managing Director, Fujifilm Computer System Company
----
XEROX = 99.999% uptime on SQLServer 2005:
http://www.microsoft.com/casestudies/Case_Study_Detail.aspx?CaseStudyID=49133
"SQL Server 2005 is mission critical to the Xerox Office Services application. To achieve the 99.999 percent uptime required by the application, we rely on SQL Server 2005 clustering capabilities." - Kirk Pothos Software Development Manager, Xerox Global Services
----
ANTHONY MARANO COMPANY = 99.999% uptime on SQLServer 2005:
http://www.cwhonors.org/viewCaseStudy2008.asp?NominationID=789
"By migrating to the Fujitsu platform, Anthony Marano has gone from 95 percent system availability to 99.999 percent availability"
----
MEDITERRANEAN SHIPPING COMPANY: = 99.999% uptime on SQLServer:
"MSCLinkis anapplication that must be available without fail24hours-a-day,seven day seachweek, and 365 days a year",says Catassi. "WithSQLServer 2005 weve
enjoyed 99.999 percentavailability"----
AND, LAST BUT NOT LEAST? NASDAQ EVIDENCE (finally) of 99.999% uptime (for MDDS):
Trusted Platform Market Data Dissemination System
5K txs / second, 100K queries / day, running on SQL Server 2005
Fixed Income Trade and Positioning
System running on SQL Server 2005
30% performance increase,
capacity to process 1,000 trades / second5TB of data on SQL Server 2005
99.999% uptime, scalability for 30% annual growthAND, Here is a rating of "does the job PERFECTLY" by Ken Richmond, the guy who RUNS THE SHOW IN IS/IT @ NASDAQ FOR YOUR FURTHER REFERENCE (& perfect? MEANS PERFECT - 99.999%
-
k10quant, you troll: Prepare to EAT YOUR WORDS!
"The marketing was clever enough to fool anyone who would believe Windows can have that sort of performance and uptime
;)" - by k10quaint (1344115)
on Friday July 03, @01:27PM (#28573263)Hey, wiseguy: Take a read, especially in regards to your IGNORANT comment I quoted above...
For Sprocket ( the troll himself ), k10quant, cbiltcliffe & the A/C one most of all, time to "eat your words", wiseguys:
----
FUJIFILM = 99.999% uptime on SQLServer 2005:
"This is a mission-critical project, which needs to keep running on 99.999 percent availability. Stoppages are just not acceptable. SQL Server 2005 gives us the reliability we require." - Michito Watanabe, President and Managing Director, Fujifilm Computer System Company
----
XEROX = 99.999% uptime on SQLServer 2005:
http://www.microsoft.com/casestudies/Case_Study_Detail.aspx?CaseStudyID=49133
"SQL Server 2005 is mission critical to the Xerox Office Services application. To achieve the 99.999 percent uptime required by the application, we rely on SQL Server 2005 clustering capabilities." - Kirk Pothos Software Development Manager, Xerox Global Services
----
ANTHONY MARANO COMPANY = 99.999% uptime on SQLServer 2005:
http://www.cwhonors.org/viewCaseStudy2008.asp?NominationID=789
"By migrating to the Fujitsu platform, Anthony Marano has gone from 95 percent system availability to 99.999 percent availability"
----
MEDITERRANEAN SHIPPING COMPANY: = 99.999% uptime on SQLServer:
"MSCLinkis anapplication that must be available without fail24hours-a-day,seven day seachweek, and 365 days a year",says Catassi. "WithSQLServer 2005 weve
enjoyed 99.999 percentavailability"----
AND, LAST BUT NOT LEAST? NASDAQ EVIDENCE (finally) of 99.999% uptime (for MDDS):
Trusted Platform Market Data Dissemination System
5K txs / second, 100K queries / day, running on SQL Server 2005
Fixed Income Trade and Positioning
System running on SQL Server 2005
30% performance increase,
capacity to process 1,000 trades / second5TB of data on SQL Server 2005
99.999% uptime, scalability for 30% annual growthAND, Here is a rating of "does the job PERFECTLY" by Ken Richmond, the guy who RUNS THE SHOW IN IS/IT @ NASDAQ FOR YOUR FURTHER REFERENCE (& perfect? MEANS PERFECT - 99.999%
-
Trolls eat your words (99.999% uptime evidence)
"The marketing was clever enough to fool anyone who would believe Windows can have that sort of performance and uptime
;)" - by k10quaint (1344115)
on Friday July 03, @01:27PM (#28573263)Hey, wiseguy: Take a read, especially in regards to your IGNORANT comment I quoted above...
For Sprocket ( the troll himself ), k10quant, cbiltcliffe & the A/C one most of all, time to "eat your words", wiseguys:
----
FUJIFILM = 99.999% uptime on SQLServer 2005:
"This is a mission-critical project, which needs to keep running on 99.999 percent availability. Stoppages are just not acceptable. SQL Server 2005 gives us the reliability we require." - Michito Watanabe, President and Managing Director, Fujifilm Computer System Company
----
XEROX = 99.999% uptime on SQLServer 2005:
http://www.microsoft.com/casestudies/Case_Study_Detail.aspx?CaseStudyID=49133
"SQL Server 2005 is mission critical to the Xerox Office Services application. To achieve the 99.999 percent uptime required by the application, we rely on SQL Server 2005 clustering capabilities." - Kirk Pothos Software Development Manager, Xerox Global Services
----
ANTHONY MARANO COMPANY = 99.999% uptime on SQLServer 2005:
http://www.cwhonors.org/viewCaseStudy2008.asp?NominationID=789
"By migrating to the Fujitsu platform, Anthony Marano has gone from 95 percent system availability to 99.999 percent availability"
----
MEDITERRANEAN SHIPPING COMPANY: = 99.999% uptime on SQLServer:
"MSCLinkis anapplication that must be available without fail24hours-a-day,seven day seachweek, and 365 days a year",says Catassi. "WithSQLServer 2005 weve
enjoyed 99.999 percentavailability"----
AND, LAST BUT NOT LEAST? NASDAQ EVIDENCE (finally) of 99.999% uptime (for MDDS):
Trusted Platform Market Data Dissemination System
5K txs / second, 100K queries / day, running on SQL Server 2005
Fixed Income Trade and Positioning
System running on SQL Server 2005
30% performance increase,
capacity to process 1,000 trades / second5TB of data on SQL Server 2005
99.999% uptime, scalability for 30% annual growthAND, Here is a rating of "does the job PERFECTLY" by Ken Richmond, the guy who RUNS THE SHOW IN IS/IT @ NASDAQ FOR YOUR FURTHER REFERENCE (& perfect? MEANS PERFECT - 99.999%
-
Trolls eat your words (99.999% uptime evidence)
"The marketing was clever enough to fool anyone who would believe Windows can have that sort of performance and uptime
;)" - by k10quaint (1344115)
on Friday July 03, @01:27PM (#28573263)Hey, wiseguy: Take a read, especially in regards to your IGNORANT comment I quoted above...
For Sprocket ( the troll himself ), k10quant, cbiltcliffe & the A/C one most of all, time to "eat your words", wiseguys:
----
FUJIFILM = 99.999% uptime on SQLServer 2005:
"This is a mission-critical project, which needs to keep running on 99.999 percent availability. Stoppages are just not acceptable. SQL Server 2005 gives us the reliability we require." - Michito Watanabe, President and Managing Director, Fujifilm Computer System Company
----
XEROX = 99.999% uptime on SQLServer 2005:
http://www.microsoft.com/casestudies/Case_Study_Detail.aspx?CaseStudyID=49133
"SQL Server 2005 is mission critical to the Xerox Office Services application. To achieve the 99.999 percent uptime required by the application, we rely on SQL Server 2005 clustering capabilities." - Kirk Pothos Software Development Manager, Xerox Global Services
----
ANTHONY MARANO COMPANY = 99.999% uptime on SQLServer 2005:
http://www.cwhonors.org/viewCaseStudy2008.asp?NominationID=789
"By migrating to the Fujitsu platform, Anthony Marano has gone from 95 percent system availability to 99.999 percent availability"
----
MEDITERRANEAN SHIPPING COMPANY: = 99.999% uptime on SQLServer:
"MSCLinkis anapplication that must be available without fail24hours-a-day,seven day seachweek, and 365 days a year",says Catassi. "WithSQLServer 2005 weve
enjoyed 99.999 percentavailability"----
AND, LAST BUT NOT LEAST? NASDAQ EVIDENCE (finally) of 99.999% uptime (for MDDS):
Trusted Platform Market Data Dissemination System
5K txs / second, 100K queries / day, running on SQL Server 2005
Fixed Income Trade and Positioning
System running on SQL Server 2005
30% performance increase,
capacity to process 1,000 trades / second5TB of data on SQL Server 2005
99.999% uptime, scalability for 30% annual growthAND, Here is a rating of "does the job PERFECTLY" by Ken Richmond, the guy who RUNS THE SHOW IN IS/IT @ NASDAQ FOR YOUR FURTHER REFERENCE (& perfect? MEANS PERFECT - 99.999%
-
Trolls eat your words (99.999% uptime evidence)
"The marketing was clever enough to fool anyone who would believe Windows can have that sort of performance and uptime
;)" - by k10quaint (1344115)
on Friday July 03, @01:27PM (#28573263)Hey, wiseguy: Take a read, especially in regards to your IGNORANT comment I quoted above...
For Sprocket ( the troll himself ), k10quant, cbiltcliffe & the A/C one most of all, time to "eat your words", wiseguys:
----
FUJIFILM = 99.999% uptime on SQLServer 2005:
"This is a mission-critical project, which needs to keep running on 99.999 percent availability. Stoppages are just not acceptable. SQL Server 2005 gives us the reliability we require." - Michito Watanabe, President and Managing Director, Fujifilm Computer System Company
----
XEROX = 99.999% uptime on SQLServer 2005:
http://www.microsoft.com/casestudies/Case_Study_Detail.aspx?CaseStudyID=49133
"SQL Server 2005 is mission critical to the Xerox Office Services application. To achieve the 99.999 percent uptime required by the application, we rely on SQL Server 2005 clustering capabilities." - Kirk Pothos Software Development Manager, Xerox Global Services
----
ANTHONY MARANO COMPANY = 99.999% uptime on SQLServer 2005:
http://www.cwhonors.org/viewCaseStudy2008.asp?NominationID=789
"By migrating to the Fujitsu platform, Anthony Marano has gone from 95 percent system availability to 99.999 percent availability"
----
MEDITERRANEAN SHIPPING COMPANY: = 99.999% uptime on SQLServer:
"MSCLinkis anapplication that must be available without fail24hours-a-day,seven day seachweek, and 365 days a year",says Catassi. "WithSQLServer 2005 weve
enjoyed 99.999 percentavailability"----
AND, LAST BUT NOT LEAST? NASDAQ EVIDENCE (finally) of 99.999% uptime (for MDDS):
Trusted Platform Market Data Dissemination System
5K txs / second, 100K queries / day, running on SQL Server 2005
Fixed Income Trade and Positioning
System running on SQL Server 2005
30% performance increase,
capacity to process 1,000 trades / second5TB of data on SQL Server 2005
99.999% uptime, scalability for 30% annual growthAND, Here is a rating of "does the job PERFECTLY" by Ken Richmond, the guy who RUNS THE SHOW IN IS/IT @ NASDAQ FOR YOUR FURTHER REFERENCE (& perfect? MEANS PERFECT - 99.999%
-
EAT YOUR WORDS, troll (99.999% uptime evidences)
For Sprocket ( the troll himself ), k10quant, cbiltcliffe & the A/C one most of all, time to "eat your words", wiseguys:
----
FUJIFILM = 99.999% uptime on SQLServer 2005:
"This is a mission-critical project, which needs to keep running on 99.999 percent availability. Stoppages are just not acceptable. SQL Server 2005 gives us the reliability we require." - Michito Watanabe, President and Managing Director, Fujifilm Computer System Company
----
XEROX = 99.999% uptime on SQLServer 2005:
http://www.microsoft.com/casestudies/Case_Study_Detail.aspx?CaseStudyID=49133
"SQL Server 2005 is mission critical to the Xerox Office Services application. To achieve the 99.999 percent uptime required by the application, we rely on SQL Server 2005 clustering capabilities." - Kirk Pothos Software Development Manager, Xerox Global Services
----
ANTHONY MARANO COMPANY = 99.999% uptime on SQLServer 2005:
http://www.cwhonors.org/viewCaseStudy2008.asp?NominationID=789
"By migrating to the Fujitsu platform, Anthony Marano has gone from 95 percent system availability to 99.999 percent availability"
----
MEDITERRANEAN SHIPPING COMPANY: = 99.999% uptime on SQLServer:
"MSCLinkis anapplication that must be available without fail24hours-a-day,seven day seachweek, and 365 days a year",says Catassi. "WithSQLServer 2005 weve
enjoyed 99.999 percentavailability"----
AND, LAST BUT NOT LEAST? NASDAQ EVIDENCE (finally) of 99.999% uptime (for MDDS):
Trusted Platform Market Data Dissemination System
5K txs / second, 100K queries / day, running on SQL Server 2005
Fixed Income Trade and Positioning
System running on SQL Server 2005
30% performance increase,
capacity to process 1,000 trades / second5TB of data on SQL Server 2005
99.999% uptime, scalability for 30% annual growthWeb solution managing millions of devices,
7 million txs / day, with 99.999% uptime
Built with Visual Studio 2005,
running on SQL Server 2005Integrated with Visual Studio and
.NET
Integrated development &
debugging experience
Execution location &
programming language choiceSQL Server Service Broker
Asynchronous queuing for
highly available applications
Reliable messaging for scale outCacheSync
High performance ASP.NET 2.0 appsXML Data Type
-
EAT YOUR WORDS, troll (99.999% uptime evidences)
For Sprocket ( the troll himself ), k10quant, cbiltcliffe & the A/C one most of all, time to "eat your words", wiseguys:
----
FUJIFILM = 99.999% uptime on SQLServer 2005:
"This is a mission-critical project, which needs to keep running on 99.999 percent availability. Stoppages are just not acceptable. SQL Server 2005 gives us the reliability we require." - Michito Watanabe, President and Managing Director, Fujifilm Computer System Company
----
XEROX = 99.999% uptime on SQLServer 2005:
http://www.microsoft.com/casestudies/Case_Study_Detail.aspx?CaseStudyID=49133
"SQL Server 2005 is mission critical to the Xerox Office Services application. To achieve the 99.999 percent uptime required by the application, we rely on SQL Server 2005 clustering capabilities." - Kirk Pothos Software Development Manager, Xerox Global Services
----
ANTHONY MARANO COMPANY = 99.999% uptime on SQLServer 2005:
http://www.cwhonors.org/viewCaseStudy2008.asp?NominationID=789
"By migrating to the Fujitsu platform, Anthony Marano has gone from 95 percent system availability to 99.999 percent availability"
----
MEDITERRANEAN SHIPPING COMPANY: = 99.999% uptime on SQLServer:
"MSCLinkis anapplication that must be available without fail24hours-a-day,seven day seachweek, and 365 days a year",says Catassi. "WithSQLServer 2005 weve
enjoyed 99.999 percentavailability"----
AND, LAST BUT NOT LEAST? NASDAQ EVIDENCE (finally) of 99.999% uptime (for MDDS):
Trusted Platform Market Data Dissemination System
5K txs / second, 100K queries / day, running on SQL Server 2005
Fixed Income Trade and Positioning
System running on SQL Server 2005
30% performance increase,
capacity to process 1,000 trades / second5TB of data on SQL Server 2005
99.999% uptime, scalability for 30% annual growthWeb solution managing millions of devices,
7 million txs / day, with 99.999% uptime
Built with Visual Studio 2005,
running on SQL Server 2005Integrated with Visual Studio and
.NET
Integrated development &
debugging experience
Execution location &
programming language choiceSQL Server Service Broker
Asynchronous queuing for
highly available applications
Reliable messaging for scale outCacheSync
High performance ASP.NET 2.0 appsXML Data Type
-
EAT YOUR WORDS, troll (99.999% uptime evidences)
For Sprocket ( the troll himself ), k10quant, cbiltcliffe & the A/C one most of all, time to "eat your words", wiseguys:
----
FUJIFILM = 99.999% uptime on SQLServer 2005:
"This is a mission-critical project, which needs to keep running on 99.999 percent availability. Stoppages are just not acceptable. SQL Server 2005 gives us the reliability we require." - Michito Watanabe, President and Managing Director, Fujifilm Computer System Company
----
XEROX = 99.999% uptime on SQLServer 2005:
http://www.microsoft.com/casestudies/Case_Study_Detail.aspx?CaseStudyID=49133
"SQL Server 2005 is mission critical to the Xerox Office Services application. To achieve the 99.999 percent uptime required by the application, we rely on SQL Server 2005 clustering capabilities." - Kirk Pothos Software Development Manager, Xerox Global Services
----
ANTHONY MARANO COMPANY = 99.999% uptime on SQLServer 2005:
http://www.cwhonors.org/viewCaseStudy2008.asp?NominationID=789
"By migrating to the Fujitsu platform, Anthony Marano has gone from 95 percent system availability to 99.999 percent availability"
----
MEDITERRANEAN SHIPPING COMPANY: = 99.999% uptime on SQLServer:
"MSCLinkis anapplication that must be available without fail24hours-a-day,seven day seachweek, and 365 days a year",says Catassi. "WithSQLServer 2005 weve
enjoyed 99.999 percentavailability"----
AND, LAST BUT NOT LEAST? NASDAQ EVIDENCE (finally) of 99.999% uptime (for MDDS):
Trusted Platform Market Data Dissemination System
5K txs / second, 100K queries / day, running on SQL Server 2005
Fixed Income Trade and Positioning
System running on SQL Server 2005
30% performance increase,
capacity to process 1,000 trades / second5TB of data on SQL Server 2005
99.999% uptime, scalability for 30% annual growthWeb solution managing millions of devices,
7 million txs / day, with 99.999% uptime
Built with Visual Studio 2005,
running on SQL Server 2005Integrated with Visual Studio and
.NET
Integrated development &
debugging experience
Execution location &
programming language choiceSQL Server Service Broker
Asynchronous queuing for
highly available applications
Reliable messaging for scale outCacheSync
High performance ASP.NET 2.0 appsXML Data Type
-
SPROCKET has to "EAT HIS WORDS" & evade questi
For Sprocket ( the troll himself ), k10quant, cbiltcliffe & the A/C one most of all, time to "eat your words", wiseguys:
----
FUJIFILM = 99.999% uptime on SQLServer 2005:
"This is a mission-critical project, which needs to keep running on 99.999 percent availability. Stoppages are just not acceptable. SQL Server 2005 gives us the reliability we require." - Michito Watanabe, President and Managing Director, Fujifilm Computer System Company
----
XEROX = 99.999% uptime on SQLServer 2005:
http://www.microsoft.com/casestudies/Case_Study_Detail.aspx?CaseStudyID=49133
"SQL Server 2005 is mission critical to the Xerox Office Services application. To achieve the 99.999 percent uptime required by the application, we rely on SQL Server 2005 clustering capabilities." - Kirk Pothos Software Development Manager, Xerox Global Services
----
ANTHONY MARANO COMPANY = 99.999% uptime on SQLServer 2005:
http://www.cwhonors.org/viewCaseStudy2008.asp?NominationID=789
"By migrating to the Fujitsu platform, Anthony Marano has gone from 95 percent system availability to 99.999 percent availability"
----
MEDITERRANEAN SHIPPING COMPANY: = 99.999% uptime on SQLServer:
"MSCLinkis anapplication that must be available without fail24hours-a-day,seven day seachweek, and 365 days a year",says Catassi. "WithSQLServer 2005 weve
enjoyed 99.999 percentavailability"----
AND, LAST BUT NOT LEAST? NASDAQ EVIDENCE (finally) of 99.999% uptime (for MDDS):
Trusted Platform Market Data Dissemination System
5K txs / second, 100K queries / day, running on SQL Server 2005
Fixed Income Trade and Positioning
System running on SQL Server 2005
30% performance increase,
capacity to process 1,000 trades / second5TB of data on SQL Server 2005
99.999% uptime, scalability for 30% annual growthWeb solution managing millions of devices,
7 million txs / day, with 99.999% uptime
Built with Visual Studio 2005,
running on SQL Server 2005Integrated with Visual Studio and
.NET
Integrated development &
debugging experience
Execution location &
programming language choiceSQL Server Service Broker
Asynchronous queuing for
highly available applications
Reliable messaging for scale outCacheSync
High performance ASP.NET 2.0 appsXML Data Type
-
SPROCKET has to "EAT HIS WORDS" & evade questi
For Sprocket ( the troll himself ), k10quant, cbiltcliffe & the A/C one most of all, time to "eat your words", wiseguys:
----
FUJIFILM = 99.999% uptime on SQLServer 2005:
"This is a mission-critical project, which needs to keep running on 99.999 percent availability. Stoppages are just not acceptable. SQL Server 2005 gives us the reliability we require." - Michito Watanabe, President and Managing Director, Fujifilm Computer System Company
----
XEROX = 99.999% uptime on SQLServer 2005:
http://www.microsoft.com/casestudies/Case_Study_Detail.aspx?CaseStudyID=49133
"SQL Server 2005 is mission critical to the Xerox Office Services application. To achieve the 99.999 percent uptime required by the application, we rely on SQL Server 2005 clustering capabilities." - Kirk Pothos Software Development Manager, Xerox Global Services
----
ANTHONY MARANO COMPANY = 99.999% uptime on SQLServer 2005:
http://www.cwhonors.org/viewCaseStudy2008.asp?NominationID=789
"By migrating to the Fujitsu platform, Anthony Marano has gone from 95 percent system availability to 99.999 percent availability"
----
MEDITERRANEAN SHIPPING COMPANY: = 99.999% uptime on SQLServer:
"MSCLinkis anapplication that must be available without fail24hours-a-day,seven day seachweek, and 365 days a year",says Catassi. "WithSQLServer 2005 weve
enjoyed 99.999 percentavailability"----
AND, LAST BUT NOT LEAST? NASDAQ EVIDENCE (finally) of 99.999% uptime (for MDDS):
Trusted Platform Market Data Dissemination System
5K txs / second, 100K queries / day, running on SQL Server 2005
Fixed Income Trade and Positioning
System running on SQL Server 2005
30% performance increase,
capacity to process 1,000 trades / second5TB of data on SQL Server 2005
99.999% uptime, scalability for 30% annual growthWeb solution managing millions of devices,
7 million txs / day, with 99.999% uptime
Built with Visual Studio 2005,
running on SQL Server 2005Integrated with Visual Studio and
.NET
Integrated development &
debugging experience
Execution location &
programming language choiceSQL Server Service Broker
Asynchronous queuing for
highly available applications
Reliable messaging for scale outCacheSync
High performance ASP.NET 2.0 appsXML Data Type
-
SPROCKET has to "EAT HIS WORDS" & evade questi
For Sprocket ( the troll himself ), k10quant, cbiltcliffe & the A/C one most of all, time to "eat your words", wiseguys:
----
FUJIFILM = 99.999% uptime on SQLServer 2005:
"This is a mission-critical project, which needs to keep running on 99.999 percent availability. Stoppages are just not acceptable. SQL Server 2005 gives us the reliability we require." - Michito Watanabe, President and Managing Director, Fujifilm Computer System Company
----
XEROX = 99.999% uptime on SQLServer 2005:
http://www.microsoft.com/casestudies/Case_Study_Detail.aspx?CaseStudyID=49133
"SQL Server 2005 is mission critical to the Xerox Office Services application. To achieve the 99.999 percent uptime required by the application, we rely on SQL Server 2005 clustering capabilities." - Kirk Pothos Software Development Manager, Xerox Global Services
----
ANTHONY MARANO COMPANY = 99.999% uptime on SQLServer 2005:
http://www.cwhonors.org/viewCaseStudy2008.asp?NominationID=789
"By migrating to the Fujitsu platform, Anthony Marano has gone from 95 percent system availability to 99.999 percent availability"
----
MEDITERRANEAN SHIPPING COMPANY: = 99.999% uptime on SQLServer:
"MSCLinkis anapplication that must be available without fail24hours-a-day,seven day seachweek, and 365 days a year",says Catassi. "WithSQLServer 2005 weve
enjoyed 99.999 percentavailability"----
AND, LAST BUT NOT LEAST? NASDAQ EVIDENCE (finally) of 99.999% uptime (for MDDS):
Trusted Platform Market Data Dissemination System
5K txs / second, 100K queries / day, running on SQL Server 2005
Fixed Income Trade and Positioning
System running on SQL Server 2005
30% performance increase,
capacity to process 1,000 trades / second5TB of data on SQL Server 2005
99.999% uptime, scalability for 30% annual growthWeb solution managing millions of devices,
7 million txs / day, with 99.999% uptime
Built with Visual Studio 2005,
running on SQL Server 2005Integrated with Visual Studio and
.NET
Integrated development &
debugging experience
Execution location &
programming language choiceSQL Server Service Broker
Asynchronous queuing for
highly available applications
Reliable messaging for scale outCacheSync
High performance ASP.NET 2.0 appsXML Data Type
-
99.999% uptime evidences for SQLServer 2005
For _Sprocket_, k10quant, cbiltcliffe & the A/C one most of all, time to "eat your words", wise ass dolts:
(And "There YOU are", A/C, next below...)
----
FUJIFILM = 99.999% uptime on SQLServer 2005:
"This is a mission-critical project, which needs to keep running on 99.999 percent availability. Stoppages are just not acceptable. SQL Server 2005 gives us the reliability we require." - Michito Watanabe, President and Managing Director, Fujifilm Computer System Company
----
XEROX = 99.999% uptime on SQLServer 2005:
http://www.microsoft.com/casestudies/Case_Study_Detail.aspx?CaseStudyID=49133
"SQL Server 2005 is mission critical to the Xerox Office Services application. To achieve the 99.999 percent uptime required by the application, we rely on SQL Server 2005 clustering capabilities." - Kirk Pothos Software Development Manager, Xerox Global Services
----
ANTHONY MARANO COMPANY = 99.999% uptime on SQLServer 2005:
http://www.cwhonors.org/viewCaseStudy2008.asp?NominationID=789
"By migrating to the Fujitsu platform, Anthony Marano has gone from 95 percent system availability to 99.999 percent availability"
----
MEDITERRANEAN SHIPPING COMPANY: = 99.999% uptime on SQLServer:
"MSCLinkis anapplication that must be available without fail24hours-a-day,seven day seachweek, and 365 days a year",says Catassi. "WithSQLServer 2005 weve
enjoyed 99.999 percentavailability"----
AND, LAST BUT NOT LEAST? NASDAQ EVIDENCE (finally) of 99.999% uptime (for MDDS):
Trusted Platform Market Data Dissemination System
5K txs / second, 100K queries / day, running on SQL Server 2005
Fixed Income Trade and Positioning
System running on SQL Server 2005
30% performance increase,
capacity to process 1,000 trades / second5TB of data on SQL Server 2005
99.999% uptime, scalability for 30% annual growthWeb solution managing millions of devices,
7 million txs / day, with 99.999% uptime
Built with Visual Studio 2005,
running on SQL Server 2005Integrated with Visual Studio and
.NET
Integrated development &
debugging experience
Execution location &
programming language choiceSQL Server Service Broker
Asynchronous queuing for
highly available applications
Reliable messaging for scale outCacheSync
High performance AS -
99.999% uptime evidences for SQLServer 2005
For _Sprocket_, k10quant, cbiltcliffe & the A/C one most of all, time to "eat your words", wise ass dolts:
(And "There YOU are", A/C, next below...)
----
FUJIFILM = 99.999% uptime on SQLServer 2005:
"This is a mission-critical project, which needs to keep running on 99.999 percent availability. Stoppages are just not acceptable. SQL Server 2005 gives us the reliability we require." - Michito Watanabe, President and Managing Director, Fujifilm Computer System Company
----
XEROX = 99.999% uptime on SQLServer 2005:
http://www.microsoft.com/casestudies/Case_Study_Detail.aspx?CaseStudyID=49133
"SQL Server 2005 is mission critical to the Xerox Office Services application. To achieve the 99.999 percent uptime required by the application, we rely on SQL Server 2005 clustering capabilities." - Kirk Pothos Software Development Manager, Xerox Global Services
----
ANTHONY MARANO COMPANY = 99.999% uptime on SQLServer 2005:
http://www.cwhonors.org/viewCaseStudy2008.asp?NominationID=789
"By migrating to the Fujitsu platform, Anthony Marano has gone from 95 percent system availability to 99.999 percent availability"
----
MEDITERRANEAN SHIPPING COMPANY: = 99.999% uptime on SQLServer:
"MSCLinkis anapplication that must be available without fail24hours-a-day,seven day seachweek, and 365 days a year",says Catassi. "WithSQLServer 2005 weve
enjoyed 99.999 percentavailability"----
AND, LAST BUT NOT LEAST? NASDAQ EVIDENCE (finally) of 99.999% uptime (for MDDS):
Trusted Platform Market Data Dissemination System
5K txs / second, 100K queries / day, running on SQL Server 2005
Fixed Income Trade and Positioning
System running on SQL Server 2005
30% performance increase,
capacity to process 1,000 trades / second5TB of data on SQL Server 2005
99.999% uptime, scalability for 30% annual growthWeb solution managing millions of devices,
7 million txs / day, with 99.999% uptime
Built with Visual Studio 2005,
running on SQL Server 2005Integrated with Visual Studio and
.NET
Integrated development &
debugging experience
Execution location &
programming language choiceSQL Server Service Broker
Asynchronous queuing for
highly available applications
Reliable messaging for scale outCacheSync
High performance AS -
99.999% uptime evidences for SQLServer 2005
For _Sprocket_, k10quant, cbiltcliffe & the A/C one most of all, time to "eat your words", wise ass dolts:
(And "There YOU are", A/C, next below...)
----
FUJIFILM = 99.999% uptime on SQLServer 2005:
"This is a mission-critical project, which needs to keep running on 99.999 percent availability. Stoppages are just not acceptable. SQL Server 2005 gives us the reliability we require." - Michito Watanabe, President and Managing Director, Fujifilm Computer System Company
----
XEROX = 99.999% uptime on SQLServer 2005:
http://www.microsoft.com/casestudies/Case_Study_Detail.aspx?CaseStudyID=49133
"SQL Server 2005 is mission critical to the Xerox Office Services application. To achieve the 99.999 percent uptime required by the application, we rely on SQL Server 2005 clustering capabilities." - Kirk Pothos Software Development Manager, Xerox Global Services
----
ANTHONY MARANO COMPANY = 99.999% uptime on SQLServer 2005:
http://www.cwhonors.org/viewCaseStudy2008.asp?NominationID=789
"By migrating to the Fujitsu platform, Anthony Marano has gone from 95 percent system availability to 99.999 percent availability"
----
MEDITERRANEAN SHIPPING COMPANY: = 99.999% uptime on SQLServer:
"MSCLinkis anapplication that must be available without fail24hours-a-day,seven day seachweek, and 365 days a year",says Catassi. "WithSQLServer 2005 weve
enjoyed 99.999 percentavailability"----
AND, LAST BUT NOT LEAST? NASDAQ EVIDENCE (finally) of 99.999% uptime (for MDDS):
Trusted Platform Market Data Dissemination System
5K txs / second, 100K queries / day, running on SQL Server 2005
Fixed Income Trade and Positioning
System running on SQL Server 2005
30% performance increase,
capacity to process 1,000 trades / second5TB of data on SQL Server 2005
99.999% uptime, scalability for 30% annual growthWeb solution managing millions of devices,
7 million txs / day, with 99.999% uptime
Built with Visual Studio 2005,
running on SQL Server 2005Integrated with Visual Studio and
.NET
Integrated development &
debugging experience
Execution location &
programming language choiceSQL Server Service Broker
Asynchronous queuing for
highly available applications
Reliable messaging for scale outCacheSync
High performance AS -
99.999% uptime proofs 4 SQLServer 2005
For _Sprocket_, k10quant, cbiltcliffe & the A/C one most of all, time to "eat your words", fools:
----
FUJIFILM = 99.999% uptime on SQLServer 2005:
"This is a mission-critical project, which needs to keep running on 99.999 percent availability. Stoppages are just not acceptable. SQL Server 2005 gives us the reliability we require." - Michito Watanabe, President and Managing Director, Fujifilm Computer System Company
----
XEROX = 99.999% uptime on SQLServer 2005:
http://www.microsoft.com/casestudies/Case_Study_Detail.aspx?CaseStudyID=49133
"SQL Server 2005 is mission critical to the Xerox Office Services application. To achieve the 99.999 percent uptime required by the application, we rely on SQL Server 2005 clustering capabilities." - Kirk Pothos Software Development Manager, Xerox Global Services
----
ANTHONY MARANO COMPANY = 99.999% uptime on SQLServer 2005:
http://www.cwhonors.org/viewCaseStudy2008.asp?NominationID=789
"By migrating to the Fujitsu platform, Anthony Marano has gone from 95 percent system availability to 99.999 percent availability"
----
MEDITERRANEAN SHIPPING COMPANY: = 99.999% uptime on SQLServer:
"MSCLinkis anapplication that must be available without fail24hours-a-day,seven day seachweek, and 365 days a year",says Catassi. "WithSQLServer 2005 weve
enjoyed 99.999 percentavailability"----
AND, LAST BUT NOT LEAST? NASDAQ EVIDENCE (finally) of 99.999% uptime (for MDDS):
Trusted Platform Market Data Dissemination System
5K txs / second, 100K queries / day, running on SQL Server 2005
Fixed Income Trade and Positioning
System running on SQL Server 2005
30% performance increase,
capacity to process 1,000 trades / second5TB of data on SQL Server 2005
99.999% uptime, scalability for 30% annual growthWeb solution managing millions of devices,
7 million txs / day, with 99.999% uptime
Built with Visual Studio 2005,
running on SQL Server 2005Integrated with Visual Studio and
.NET
Integrated development &
debugging experience
Execution location &
programming language choiceSQL Server Service Broker
Asynchronous queuing for
highly available applications
Reliable messaging for scale outCacheSync
High performance ASP.NET 2.0 appsXML Data Type
Native XML support -
99.999% uptime proofs 4 SQLServer 2005
For _Sprocket_, k10quant, cbiltcliffe & the A/C one most of all, time to "eat your words", fools:
----
FUJIFILM = 99.999% uptime on SQLServer 2005:
"This is a mission-critical project, which needs to keep running on 99.999 percent availability. Stoppages are just not acceptable. SQL Server 2005 gives us the reliability we require." - Michito Watanabe, President and Managing Director, Fujifilm Computer System Company
----
XEROX = 99.999% uptime on SQLServer 2005:
http://www.microsoft.com/casestudies/Case_Study_Detail.aspx?CaseStudyID=49133
"SQL Server 2005 is mission critical to the Xerox Office Services application. To achieve the 99.999 percent uptime required by the application, we rely on SQL Server 2005 clustering capabilities." - Kirk Pothos Software Development Manager, Xerox Global Services
----
ANTHONY MARANO COMPANY = 99.999% uptime on SQLServer 2005:
http://www.cwhonors.org/viewCaseStudy2008.asp?NominationID=789
"By migrating to the Fujitsu platform, Anthony Marano has gone from 95 percent system availability to 99.999 percent availability"
----
MEDITERRANEAN SHIPPING COMPANY: = 99.999% uptime on SQLServer:
"MSCLinkis anapplication that must be available without fail24hours-a-day,seven day seachweek, and 365 days a year",says Catassi. "WithSQLServer 2005 weve
enjoyed 99.999 percentavailability"----
AND, LAST BUT NOT LEAST? NASDAQ EVIDENCE (finally) of 99.999% uptime (for MDDS):
Trusted Platform Market Data Dissemination System
5K txs / second, 100K queries / day, running on SQL Server 2005
Fixed Income Trade and Positioning
System running on SQL Server 2005
30% performance increase,
capacity to process 1,000 trades / second5TB of data on SQL Server 2005
99.999% uptime, scalability for 30% annual growthWeb solution managing millions of devices,
7 million txs / day, with 99.999% uptime
Built with Visual Studio 2005,
running on SQL Server 2005Integrated with Visual Studio and
.NET
Integrated development &
debugging experience
Execution location &
programming language choiceSQL Server Service Broker
Asynchronous queuing for
highly available applications
Reliable messaging for scale outCacheSync
High performance ASP.NET 2.0 appsXML Data Type
Native XML support -
99.999% uptime proofs 4 SQLServer 2005
For _Sprocket_, k10quant, cbiltcliffe & the A/C one most of all, time to "eat your words", fools:
----
FUJIFILM = 99.999% uptime on SQLServer 2005:
"This is a mission-critical project, which needs to keep running on 99.999 percent availability. Stoppages are just not acceptable. SQL Server 2005 gives us the reliability we require." - Michito Watanabe, President and Managing Director, Fujifilm Computer System Company
----
XEROX = 99.999% uptime on SQLServer 2005:
http://www.microsoft.com/casestudies/Case_Study_Detail.aspx?CaseStudyID=49133
"SQL Server 2005 is mission critical to the Xerox Office Services application. To achieve the 99.999 percent uptime required by the application, we rely on SQL Server 2005 clustering capabilities." - Kirk Pothos Software Development Manager, Xerox Global Services
----
ANTHONY MARANO COMPANY = 99.999% uptime on SQLServer 2005:
http://www.cwhonors.org/viewCaseStudy2008.asp?NominationID=789
"By migrating to the Fujitsu platform, Anthony Marano has gone from 95 percent system availability to 99.999 percent availability"
----
MEDITERRANEAN SHIPPING COMPANY: = 99.999% uptime on SQLServer:
"MSCLinkis anapplication that must be available without fail24hours-a-day,seven day seachweek, and 365 days a year",says Catassi. "WithSQLServer 2005 weve
enjoyed 99.999 percentavailability"----
AND, LAST BUT NOT LEAST? NASDAQ EVIDENCE (finally) of 99.999% uptime (for MDDS):
Trusted Platform Market Data Dissemination System
5K txs / second, 100K queries / day, running on SQL Server 2005
Fixed Income Trade and Positioning
System running on SQL Server 2005
30% performance increase,
capacity to process 1,000 trades / second5TB of data on SQL Server 2005
99.999% uptime, scalability for 30% annual growthWeb solution managing millions of devices,
7 million txs / day, with 99.999% uptime
Built with Visual Studio 2005,
running on SQL Server 2005Integrated with Visual Studio and
.NET
Integrated development &
debugging experience
Execution location &
programming language choiceSQL Server Service Broker
Asynchronous queuing for
highly available applications
Reliable messaging for scale outCacheSync
High performance ASP.NET 2.0 appsXML Data Type
Native XML support -
MDDS & others have 99.999% uptime on SQLServer
For _Sprocket_, k10quant, cbiltcliffe & the A/C one most of all, time to "eat your words", wiseguys:
----
FUJIFILM = 99.999% uptime on SQLServer 2005:
"This is a mission-critical project, which needs to keep running on 99.999 percent availability. Stoppages are just not acceptable. SQL Server 2005 gives us the reliability we require." - Michito Watanabe, President and Managing Director, Fujifilm Computer System Company
----
XEROX = 99.999% uptime on SQLServer 2005:
http://www.microsoft.com/casestudies/Case_Study_Detail.aspx?CaseStudyID=49133
"SQL Server 2005 is mission critical to the Xerox Office Services application. To achieve the 99.999 percent uptime required by the application, we rely on SQL Server 2005 clustering capabilities." - Kirk Pothos Software Development Manager, Xerox Global Services
----
ANTHONY MARANO COMPANY = 99.999% uptime on SQLServer 2005:
http://www.cwhonors.org/viewCaseStudy2008.asp?NominationID=789
"By migrating to the Fujitsu platform, Anthony Marano has gone from 95 percent system availability to 99.999 percent availability"
----
MEDITERRANEAN SHIPPING COMPANY: = 99.999% uptime on SQLServer:
"MSCLinkis anapplication that must be available without fail24hours-a-day,seven day seachweek, and 365 days a year",says Catassi. "WithSQLServer 2005 weve
enjoyed 99.999 percentavailability"----
AND, LAST BUT NOT LEAST? NASDAQ EVIDENCE (finally) of 99.999% uptime (for MDDS):
Trusted Platform Market Data Dissemination System
5K txs / second, 100K queries / day, running on SQL Server 2005
Fixed Income Trade and Positioning
System running on SQL Server 2005
30% performance increase,
capacity to process 1,000 trades / second5TB of data on SQL Server 2005
99.999% uptime, scalability for 30% annual growthWeb solution managing millions of devices,
7 million txs / day, with 99.999% uptime
Built with Visual Studio 2005,
running on SQL Server 2005Integrated with Visual Studio and
.NET
Integrated development &
debugging experience
Execution location &
programming language choiceSQL Server Service Broker
Asynchronous queuing for
highly available applications
Reliable messaging for scale outCacheSync
High performance ASP.NET 2.0 appsXML Data Type
Native XML suppo -
MDDS & others have 99.999% uptime on SQLServer
For _Sprocket_, k10quant, cbiltcliffe & the A/C one most of all, time to "eat your words", wiseguys:
----
FUJIFILM = 99.999% uptime on SQLServer 2005:
"This is a mission-critical project, which needs to keep running on 99.999 percent availability. Stoppages are just not acceptable. SQL Server 2005 gives us the reliability we require." - Michito Watanabe, President and Managing Director, Fujifilm Computer System Company
----
XEROX = 99.999% uptime on SQLServer 2005:
http://www.microsoft.com/casestudies/Case_Study_Detail.aspx?CaseStudyID=49133
"SQL Server 2005 is mission critical to the Xerox Office Services application. To achieve the 99.999 percent uptime required by the application, we rely on SQL Server 2005 clustering capabilities." - Kirk Pothos Software Development Manager, Xerox Global Services
----
ANTHONY MARANO COMPANY = 99.999% uptime on SQLServer 2005:
http://www.cwhonors.org/viewCaseStudy2008.asp?NominationID=789
"By migrating to the Fujitsu platform, Anthony Marano has gone from 95 percent system availability to 99.999 percent availability"
----
MEDITERRANEAN SHIPPING COMPANY: = 99.999% uptime on SQLServer:
"MSCLinkis anapplication that must be available without fail24hours-a-day,seven day seachweek, and 365 days a year",says Catassi. "WithSQLServer 2005 weve
enjoyed 99.999 percentavailability"----
AND, LAST BUT NOT LEAST? NASDAQ EVIDENCE (finally) of 99.999% uptime (for MDDS):
Trusted Platform Market Data Dissemination System
5K txs / second, 100K queries / day, running on SQL Server 2005
Fixed Income Trade and Positioning
System running on SQL Server 2005
30% performance increase,
capacity to process 1,000 trades / second5TB of data on SQL Server 2005
99.999% uptime, scalability for 30% annual growthWeb solution managing millions of devices,
7 million txs / day, with 99.999% uptime
Built with Visual Studio 2005,
running on SQL Server 2005Integrated with Visual Studio and
.NET
Integrated development &
debugging experience
Execution location &
programming language choiceSQL Server Service Broker
Asynchronous queuing for
highly available applications
Reliable messaging for scale outCacheSync
High performance ASP.NET 2.0 appsXML Data Type
Native XML suppo -
MDDS & others have 99.999% uptime on SQLServer
For _Sprocket_, k10quant, cbiltcliffe & the A/C one most of all, time to "eat your words", wiseguys:
----
FUJIFILM = 99.999% uptime on SQLServer 2005:
"This is a mission-critical project, which needs to keep running on 99.999 percent availability. Stoppages are just not acceptable. SQL Server 2005 gives us the reliability we require." - Michito Watanabe, President and Managing Director, Fujifilm Computer System Company
----
XEROX = 99.999% uptime on SQLServer 2005:
http://www.microsoft.com/casestudies/Case_Study_Detail.aspx?CaseStudyID=49133
"SQL Server 2005 is mission critical to the Xerox Office Services application. To achieve the 99.999 percent uptime required by the application, we rely on SQL Server 2005 clustering capabilities." - Kirk Pothos Software Development Manager, Xerox Global Services
----
ANTHONY MARANO COMPANY = 99.999% uptime on SQLServer 2005:
http://www.cwhonors.org/viewCaseStudy2008.asp?NominationID=789
"By migrating to the Fujitsu platform, Anthony Marano has gone from 95 percent system availability to 99.999 percent availability"
----
MEDITERRANEAN SHIPPING COMPANY: = 99.999% uptime on SQLServer:
"MSCLinkis anapplication that must be available without fail24hours-a-day,seven day seachweek, and 365 days a year",says Catassi. "WithSQLServer 2005 weve
enjoyed 99.999 percentavailability"----
AND, LAST BUT NOT LEAST? NASDAQ EVIDENCE (finally) of 99.999% uptime (for MDDS):
Trusted Platform Market Data Dissemination System
5K txs / second, 100K queries / day, running on SQL Server 2005
Fixed Income Trade and Positioning
System running on SQL Server 2005
30% performance increase,
capacity to process 1,000 trades / second5TB of data on SQL Server 2005
99.999% uptime, scalability for 30% annual growthWeb solution managing millions of devices,
7 million txs / day, with 99.999% uptime
Built with Visual Studio 2005,
running on SQL Server 2005Integrated with Visual Studio and
.NET
Integrated development &
debugging experience
Execution location &
programming language choiceSQL Server Service Broker
Asynchronous queuing for
highly available applications
Reliable messaging for scale outCacheSync
High performance ASP.NET 2.0 appsXML Data Type
Native XML suppo -
PROOFS of SQLServer 2005 99.999% uptime
For _Sprocket_, k10quant, cbiltcliffe & the A/C one most of all, time to "eat your words", boys:
----
FUJIFILM = 99.999% uptime on SQLServer 2005:
"This is a mission-critical project, which needs to keep running on 99.999 percent availability. Stoppages are just not acceptable. SQL Server 2005 gives us the reliability we require." - Michito Watanabe, President and Managing Director, Fujifilm Computer System Company
----
XEROX = 99.999% uptime on SQLServer 2005:
http://www.microsoft.com/casestudies/Case_Study_Detail.aspx?CaseStudyID=49133
"SQL Server 2005 is mission critical to the Xerox Office Services application. To achieve the 99.999 percent uptime required by the application, we rely on SQL Server 2005 clustering capabilities." - Kirk Pothos Software Development Manager, Xerox Global Services
----
ANTHONY MARANO COMPANY = 99.999% uptime on SQLServer 2005:
http://www.cwhonors.org/viewCaseStudy2008.asp?NominationID=789
"By migrating to the Fujitsu platform, Anthony Marano has gone from 95 percent system availability to 99.999 percent availability"
----
MEDITERRANEAN SHIPPING COMPANY:
"MSCLinkis anapplication that must be available without fail24hours-a-day,seven day seachweek, and 365 days a year",says Catassi. "WithSQLServer 2005 weve
enjoyed 99.999 percentavailability"----
AND, LAST BUT NOT LEAST? NASDAQ EVIDENCE (finally) of 99.999% uptime (for MDDS):
Trusted Platform Market Data Dissemination System
5K txs / second, 100K queries / day, running on SQL Server 2005
Fixed Income Trade and Positioning
System running on SQL Server 2005
30% performance increase,
capacity to process 1,000 trades / second5TB of data on SQL Server 2005
99.999% uptime, scalability for 30% annual growthWeb solution managing millions of devices,
7 million txs / day, with 99.999% uptime
Built with Visual Studio 2005,
running on SQL Server 2005Integrated with Visual Studio and
.NET
Integrated development &
debugging experience
Execution location &
programming language choiceSQL Server Service Broker
Asynchronous queuing for
highly available applications
Reliable messaging for scale outCacheSync
High performance ASP.NET 2.0 appsXML Data Type
Native XML support in the DB----
Ho
-
PROOFS of SQLServer 2005 99.999% uptime
For _Sprocket_, k10quant, cbiltcliffe & the A/C one most of all, time to "eat your words", boys:
----
FUJIFILM = 99.999% uptime on SQLServer 2005:
"This is a mission-critical project, which needs to keep running on 99.999 percent availability. Stoppages are just not acceptable. SQL Server 2005 gives us the reliability we require." - Michito Watanabe, President and Managing Director, Fujifilm Computer System Company
----
XEROX = 99.999% uptime on SQLServer 2005:
http://www.microsoft.com/casestudies/Case_Study_Detail.aspx?CaseStudyID=49133
"SQL Server 2005 is mission critical to the Xerox Office Services application. To achieve the 99.999 percent uptime required by the application, we rely on SQL Server 2005 clustering capabilities." - Kirk Pothos Software Development Manager, Xerox Global Services
----
ANTHONY MARANO COMPANY = 99.999% uptime on SQLServer 2005:
http://www.cwhonors.org/viewCaseStudy2008.asp?NominationID=789
"By migrating to the Fujitsu platform, Anthony Marano has gone from 95 percent system availability to 99.999 percent availability"
----
MEDITERRANEAN SHIPPING COMPANY:
"MSCLinkis anapplication that must be available without fail24hours-a-day,seven day seachweek, and 365 days a year",says Catassi. "WithSQLServer 2005 weve
enjoyed 99.999 percentavailability"----
AND, LAST BUT NOT LEAST? NASDAQ EVIDENCE (finally) of 99.999% uptime (for MDDS):
Trusted Platform Market Data Dissemination System
5K txs / second, 100K queries / day, running on SQL Server 2005
Fixed Income Trade and Positioning
System running on SQL Server 2005
30% performance increase,
capacity to process 1,000 trades / second5TB of data on SQL Server 2005
99.999% uptime, scalability for 30% annual growthWeb solution managing millions of devices,
7 million txs / day, with 99.999% uptime
Built with Visual Studio 2005,
running on SQL Server 2005Integrated with Visual Studio and
.NET
Integrated development &
debugging experience
Execution location &
programming language choiceSQL Server Service Broker
Asynchronous queuing for
highly available applications
Reliable messaging for scale outCacheSync
High performance ASP.NET 2.0 appsXML Data Type
Native XML support in the DB----
Ho
-
PROOFS of SQLServer 2005 99.999% uptime
For _Sprocket_, k10quant, cbiltcliffe & the A/C one most of all, time to "eat your words", boys:
----
FUJIFILM = 99.999% uptime on SQLServer 2005:
"This is a mission-critical project, which needs to keep running on 99.999 percent availability. Stoppages are just not acceptable. SQL Server 2005 gives us the reliability we require." - Michito Watanabe, President and Managing Director, Fujifilm Computer System Company
----
XEROX = 99.999% uptime on SQLServer 2005:
http://www.microsoft.com/casestudies/Case_Study_Detail.aspx?CaseStudyID=49133
"SQL Server 2005 is mission critical to the Xerox Office Services application. To achieve the 99.999 percent uptime required by the application, we rely on SQL Server 2005 clustering capabilities." - Kirk Pothos Software Development Manager, Xerox Global Services
----
ANTHONY MARANO COMPANY = 99.999% uptime on SQLServer 2005:
http://www.cwhonors.org/viewCaseStudy2008.asp?NominationID=789
"By migrating to the Fujitsu platform, Anthony Marano has gone from 95 percent system availability to 99.999 percent availability"
----
MEDITERRANEAN SHIPPING COMPANY:
"MSCLinkis anapplication that must be available without fail24hours-a-day,seven day seachweek, and 365 days a year",says Catassi. "WithSQLServer 2005 weve
enjoyed 99.999 percentavailability"----
AND, LAST BUT NOT LEAST? NASDAQ EVIDENCE (finally) of 99.999% uptime (for MDDS):
Trusted Platform Market Data Dissemination System
5K txs / second, 100K queries / day, running on SQL Server 2005
Fixed Income Trade and Positioning
System running on SQL Server 2005
30% performance increase,
capacity to process 1,000 trades / second5TB of data on SQL Server 2005
99.999% uptime, scalability for 30% annual growthWeb solution managing millions of devices,
7 million txs / day, with 99.999% uptime
Built with Visual Studio 2005,
running on SQL Server 2005Integrated with Visual Studio and
.NET
Integrated development &
debugging experience
Execution location &
programming language choiceSQL Server Service Broker
Asynchronous queuing for
highly available applications
Reliable messaging for scale outCacheSync
High performance ASP.NET 2.0 appsXML Data Type
Native XML support in the DB----
Ho
-
Time to make you "eat your words" on 99.999%
As far as Microsoft SQLServer 2005 & Windows Server 2003 (or other versions) making 99.999% uptime?
HERE WE GO (get ready to "eat your words", per my subject-line above, Sprocket)
----
FUJIFILM = 99.999% uptime on SQLServer 2005:
"This is a mission-critical project, which needs to keep running on 99.999 percent availability. Stoppages are just not acceptable. SQL Server 2005 gives us the reliability we require. - Michito Watanabe, President and Managing Director, Fujifilm Computer System Company
----
XEROX = 99.999% uptime on SQLServer 2005:
http://www.microsoft.com/casestudies/Case_Study_Detail.aspx?CaseStudyID=49133
"SQL Server 2005 is mission critical to the Xerox Office Services application. To achieve the 99.999 percent uptime required by the application, we rely on SQL Server 2005 clustering capabilities." - Kirk Pothos Software Development Manager, Xerox Global Services
----
ANTHONY MARANO COMPANY
http://www.cwhonors.org/viewCaseStudy2008.asp?NominationID=789
"By migrating to the Fujitsu platform, Anthony Marano has gone from 95 percent system availability to 99.999 percent availability"
----
MEDITERRANEAN SHIPPING COMPANY:
MSCLinkis anapplication that must be available without fail24hours-a-day,seven day seachweek, and 365 days a year,says Catassi. WithSQLServer 2005 weve
enjoyed 99.999 percentavailability"----
AND, LAST BUT NOT LEAST? NASDAQ EVIDENCE (finally) of 99.999% uptime for MDDS:
Trusted Platform Market Data Dissemination System
5K txs / second, 100K queries / day, running on SQL Server 2005
Fixed Income Trade and Positioning
System running on SQL Server 2005
30% performance increase,
capacity to process 1,000 trades / second5TB of data on SQL Server 2005
99.999% uptime, scalability for
30% annual growthWeb solution managing millions of devices,
7 million txs / day, with 99.999% uptime
Built with Visual Studio 2005,
running on SQL Server 2005Integrated with Visual Studio and
.NET
Integrated development &
debugging experience
Execution location &
programming language choiceSQL Server Service Broker
Asynchronous queuing for
highly available applications
Reliable messaging for scale outCacheSync
High performance ASP.NET 2.0 appsXML Data Type
Native XML support in the -
Time to make you "eat your words" on 99.999%
As far as Microsoft SQLServer 2005 & Windows Server 2003 (or other versions) making 99.999% uptime?
HERE WE GO (get ready to "eat your words", per my subject-line above, Sprocket)
----
FUJIFILM = 99.999% uptime on SQLServer 2005:
"This is a mission-critical project, which needs to keep running on 99.999 percent availability. Stoppages are just not acceptable. SQL Server 2005 gives us the reliability we require. - Michito Watanabe, President and Managing Director, Fujifilm Computer System Company
----
XEROX = 99.999% uptime on SQLServer 2005:
http://www.microsoft.com/casestudies/Case_Study_Detail.aspx?CaseStudyID=49133
"SQL Server 2005 is mission critical to the Xerox Office Services application. To achieve the 99.999 percent uptime required by the application, we rely on SQL Server 2005 clustering capabilities." - Kirk Pothos Software Development Manager, Xerox Global Services
----
ANTHONY MARANO COMPANY
http://www.cwhonors.org/viewCaseStudy2008.asp?NominationID=789
"By migrating to the Fujitsu platform, Anthony Marano has gone from 95 percent system availability to 99.999 percent availability"
----
MEDITERRANEAN SHIPPING COMPANY:
MSCLinkis anapplication that must be available without fail24hours-a-day,seven day seachweek, and 365 days a year,says Catassi. WithSQLServer 2005 weve
enjoyed 99.999 percentavailability"----
AND, LAST BUT NOT LEAST? NASDAQ EVIDENCE (finally) of 99.999% uptime for MDDS:
Trusted Platform Market Data Dissemination System
5K txs / second, 100K queries / day, running on SQL Server 2005
Fixed Income Trade and Positioning
System running on SQL Server 2005
30% performance increase,
capacity to process 1,000 trades / second5TB of data on SQL Server 2005
99.999% uptime, scalability for
30% annual growthWeb solution managing millions of devices,
7 million txs / day, with 99.999% uptime
Built with Visual Studio 2005,
running on SQL Server 2005Integrated with Visual Studio and
.NET
Integrated development &
debugging experience
Execution location &
programming language choiceSQL Server Service Broker
Asynchronous queuing for
highly available applications
Reliable messaging for scale outCacheSync
High performance ASP.NET 2.0 appsXML Data Type
Native XML support in the -
Time to make you "eat your words" on 99.999%
As far as Microsoft SQLServer 2005 & Windows Server 2003 (or other versions) making 99.999% uptime?
HERE WE GO (get ready to "eat your words", per my subject-line above, Sprocket)
----
FUJIFILM = 99.999% uptime on SQLServer 2005:
"This is a mission-critical project, which needs to keep running on 99.999 percent availability. Stoppages are just not acceptable. SQL Server 2005 gives us the reliability we require. - Michito Watanabe, President and Managing Director, Fujifilm Computer System Company
----
XEROX = 99.999% uptime on SQLServer 2005:
http://www.microsoft.com/casestudies/Case_Study_Detail.aspx?CaseStudyID=49133
"SQL Server 2005 is mission critical to the Xerox Office Services application. To achieve the 99.999 percent uptime required by the application, we rely on SQL Server 2005 clustering capabilities." - Kirk Pothos Software Development Manager, Xerox Global Services
----
ANTHONY MARANO COMPANY
http://www.cwhonors.org/viewCaseStudy2008.asp?NominationID=789
"By migrating to the Fujitsu platform, Anthony Marano has gone from 95 percent system availability to 99.999 percent availability"
----
MEDITERRANEAN SHIPPING COMPANY:
MSCLinkis anapplication that must be available without fail24hours-a-day,seven day seachweek, and 365 days a year,says Catassi. WithSQLServer 2005 weve
enjoyed 99.999 percentavailability"----
AND, LAST BUT NOT LEAST? NASDAQ EVIDENCE (finally) of 99.999% uptime for MDDS:
Trusted Platform Market Data Dissemination System
5K txs / second, 100K queries / day, running on SQL Server 2005
Fixed Income Trade and Positioning
System running on SQL Server 2005
30% performance increase,
capacity to process 1,000 trades / second5TB of data on SQL Server 2005
99.999% uptime, scalability for
30% annual growthWeb solution managing millions of devices,
7 million txs / day, with 99.999% uptime
Built with Visual Studio 2005,
running on SQL Server 2005Integrated with Visual Studio and
.NET
Integrated development &
debugging experience
Execution location &
programming language choiceSQL Server Service Broker
Asynchronous queuing for
highly available applications
Reliable messaging for scale outCacheSync
High performance ASP.NET 2.0 appsXML Data Type
Native XML support in the -
One Last Time:THERE WILL BE NO HYDROGEN ECONOMY!
Like anyone, I want to see society continue as long as possible, but I have no illusions: the Hydrogen Economy is bullshit.
Why? An abbreviation: EROEI.
The sooner we forget about hydrogen and get down to actual solutions, the better.
As I said - I'm good with industrialism, but I am NOT down with stupidity. The so-called hydrogen economy is a lie. It is not a solution except to the true believers. We need to make other arrangements, and money spent on hydrogen is money down a rat hole.
RS
-
Re:When did Apple promise ZFS?
Apple downplayed the inclusion of ZFS in leopard in what appears to be an egotistical tit for tat, Sun spilled the beans early to gain some publicity and Apple reacted in typical fashion;
as for promote, look at the google cache link I provided, scroll down to the bottom and see them promoting it. Just in case you missed it in the initial post: -
Re:Genetic Blackmail
That's really insightful. It brings to mind the movie GATTACA when ethan hawke had to be extremely careful of where he left his dead skin cells, saliva, hair, etc. But this will be the case regardless of whether these tests are direct to consumer.
Imagine a home kit for paternity testing. Someone could get access to some of the british royals saliva or hair and blackmail them with proof that prince harry was diana's lover's son. I know it's blatantly obvious already, the guy is a spitting image of her red headed ex lover and looks nothing like charles but you'd be amazed how many people don't believe it.
In fact, why not high-throughput this stuff? How long before companies install sample collectors on the subway and start storing and cataloging millions of people's DNA? How long before the government decides to do it en masse? I mean they're already expanding their efforts here here and here.
Hopefully people wake up at some point and demand legislation which states that their biological information belongs to them and cannot be used without their express consent.
-
Re:Yay!
Freaking idiot, learn how to program: http://74.125.47.132/search?q=cache:Y2-L8aE3zxQJ:jmcpherson.org/editing.html+vim+keyword+completion&cd=1&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us
If you were my employee I would fire you. -
Re:Who is Michael Sharp?
I am an independant web and application developer, specializing in Content Management and Collaboration. My company, CollaborationPeople, Inc. serves clients in Seattle, Washington and the greater Puget Sound Region, although I have clients as far away as Los Angeles and Santa Barbara, CA and Portland, Or.
I primarily work within the following platforms:
Collaboration:
Microsoft Office SharePoint Server (MOSS 2007)
Windows SharePoint Services (WSS 3.0)Web Content Management:
Telerik Sitefinity CMS
MCMS 2002
MOSS 2007I have previously taught in the Continuing Education Department of Bellevue Community College in Washington State, focusing on XML technologies and the occasional COM+ class.
I program in a number of languages, but primarily C#. I also like to use Python, mostly with Plone, a content management and portal framework built on Zope.
If you need a consultant for a specific project, let me know!
Regards,
Mike Sharprdcpro@hotmail.com
"Genius" at XML. "Wizard" at XHTML. We're dealing with a force of nature here, folks.
-
Re:Here's a suggestion:
So you're moving from oppresive Apple to oppresive Microsoft. Brilliant.
Microsoft's "oppression" is a lot less overbearing in this case. For starters, I am granted root access to my phone -- no exploits needed -- just pop open the file explorer and edit/replace/delete whatever you want. A necessary consequence of having root access is that I can install any application by simply transferring the file, as opposed to being beholden to an app store with ridiculous and (as we see in TFA) completely arbitrary restrictions.
Those applications, unlike in Android and iPhoneOS, can access the entire range of OS APIs and so we can create a real NAT router (http://www.wmwifirouter.com/ -- absolutely awesome app btw, wifi, bluetooth, activesync all supported) instead of having to make a half-baked proxy application because Google decided not to expose the raw socket API. Quote the makers of AndroidProxy
It's not really a true "tethering" app. Presently we don't have access to any low level packet APIs so it's impossible (without hacking the lower levels of the phone) to write something that does the kind of NAT connection possible with Windows Mobile phones.
http://74.125.47.132/search?q=cache:q-oBbuzOHAwJ:graha.ms/androidproxy/+androidproxy
So we have an open source OS that refuses to give it's users root privileges and deliberately cripples the API versus a closed source OS with a full API and root access -- I'll call that a tie. Add in the huge application base already developed for WinMo and it's a cinch.
WinMo is not acceptable if you have any understanding of usability. I tried 2 different phones for 2 weeks with it and I'd rather use my cheapo Samsung than a phone with WinMo. Now, Blackberry/Android could be considered alternatives, but don't ever mention WinMo as usable. Please.
I actually said that WinMo is not usable out of the box, but quite usable after putting some time and effort into tweaking it how you like it. Most of all, there is a huge (xda,ppcgeeks) community of hackers constantly working at the devices. You used it for 2 weeks and, I'll bet dollars to donuts, didn't even try a custom ROM or a third-party today screen manager. Of course you put it away. I wouldn't use a stock WinMo phone either but my custom version is more usable that the iPhone by a large margin (and I'm using shitty 2 year old hardware that predates even the 2G iPhone).
Of course, this presumes that you like technology and enjoy fiddling with things to make them better. If you are a business guy that's too busy, get a Blackberry. If you are not technical enough to deal with flashing a device, transferring applications and editing settings, go for the iPhone.
Like I said, I'm watching Andriod, but the lack of a good bluetooth tethering solution (USB, lol) with real sockets is holding me back. A few years of application development and maybe we'll talk.
-
KGB Defector On Politcal Subversion
Former KGB operative and defector Yuri Bezmenov said most KGB agents were not involved in "James Bond" type espionage over atmioc secrets etc. Ideological subversion was the primary focus:
On Demoralization & Destabilization
"YURI BEZMENOV: Ideological subversion is the process which is legitimate and open. You can see it with your own eyes.... It has nothing to do with espionage.
I know that intelligence gathering looks more romantic.... That's probably why your Hollywood producers are so crazy about James Bond types of films. But in reality the main emphasis of the KGB is NOT in the area of intelligence at all. According to my opinion, and the opinions of many defectors of my caliber, only about 15% of time, money, and manpower is spent on espionage as such. The other 85% is a slow process which we call either ideological subversion, active measures, or psychological warfare. What it basically means is: to change the perception of reality of every American that despite of the abundance of information no one is able to come to sensible conclusions in the interest of defending themselves, their families, their community, and their country.
It's a great brainwashing process which goes very slow and is divided into four basic stages. The first one being "demoralization". It takes from 15 to 20 years to demoralize a nation. Why that many years? Because this is the minimum number of years required to educate one generation of students in the country of your enemy exposed to the ideology of [their] enemy. In other words, Marxism-Leninism ideology is being pumped into the soft heads of at least three generation of American students without being challenged or counterbalanced by the basic values of Americanism; American patriotism....
The result? The result you can see
... the people who graduated in the 60's, dropouts or half-baked intellectuals, are now occupying the positions of power in the government, civil service, business, mass media, and educational systems. You are stuck with them. You can't get through to them. They are contaminated. They are programmed to think and react to certain stimuli in a certain pattern [alluding to Pavlov]. You cannot change their mind even if you expose them to authentic information. Even if you prove that white is white and black is black, you still can not change the basic perception and the logic of behavior."Excellent series of videos with Yuri on YouTube. These should be required viewing in schools.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IHgYPDvQFU8&feature=related -
Re:Geeksquad.Gov
The problem is that an operating system is just something you need to get the application to work on the hardware you choose. It might be a small part of the problem. If you decide to create your own custom distro for the purpose of running your application you're going to possibly run into problems getting your application stack to work correctly on top of it or may have problems getting support.
The OS they chose was RHEL and you can infer some of the rest of the stack from the requirements.
Looks like they went with an SOA architecture on top of a J2EE stack with an Oracle backend using Eclipse as the development platform.
I don't know why these stories turn into OS flame wars. It's like blaming the spark plug for poor engine performance. The OS is probably adding vulnerabilities (Don't know of any OS that doesn't have listed vulnerabilities) but you have to look at the whole stack. Any individual part of the stack could be fine on it's own, but in combination may create other problems. On top of that, this system isn't just a combination of off the shelf components, there is a lot of coding involved and for all we know that's where most of the issues may be.
-
Re:My theory why: multiprocessors
People have been saying for years that we're about to reach the end of the line in terms of Moore's law. So far they've all been proven wrong, and scaling continues unabated.
That means that if we're at 45nm today (Intel's 32nm chips are slated for 2009), and we're assuming size shrinks 50% every 18 months, in less than 72 months we'll have reached the practical lower limit for silicon features.
I don't know if you realize it, but you are really just confirming the OP's point -- you are just another person predicting the end of Moore's law based on the technical obstacle du jour.
Moore's law is solely about the number of transistors on a single IC for a constant cost. Feature size may appear to be a limiting factor, but that doesn't mean it will be one when we get to that point. Just like leakage for features sizes below roughly 100nm was once thought to be an insurmountable obstacle to Moore's law, and then some smart people figured out how to handle it, or how lithography processes were also considered a limiting factor below roughly 60nm -- until they weren't any more.
So maybe 4nm really is a hard limit, somebody will come up with something to get around that obstacle - like say 3D ICs - adding a couple of layers and you've easily doubled the number of transistors on the same size chip.
In short, unless there is a major materials breakthrough, or materials change, I would expect Moore's law to hold for the next five years or so, but not much longer after that.
The smart money is on the breakthrough, we've had plenty of them before and there is no reason to believe they are going to stop coming.
-
Re:Huh
Wrong.
Both sides got us here. -
A little more info
Here is a briefing on the PLAID 6 protocol with more specifics on the actual algorithms and cryptography in general involved. PDF link if the first one doesn't work for you.
-
Os/2 (POSIX is what the parent to yours meant imo)
Windows NT-based OS', since their inception, have a:
POSIX compliant layer (correcting the parent post to yours, GP to mine) on that note, just being specific:
----
"NT means anything from NT 3.51 till Windows 2003, including XP), with the proper system add-ins, run OS/2 and Unix without any changes
in them at all, and supporting m ost of their features. T his is one of N Ts biggest advantages..."----
(& he (Grandfather post to mine)... well, it appears he also forgot Os/2 apps are possible as well.
(Same URL as above, very close to the excerpt above from it also)
"An example of an NT Subsystem is Win32, or normal Windows applications; another one is OS/2, or POSIX (Unix)."
(Though, here? I'm not sure about 2.1 or better class (into "Warp", in other words), but it can do them (1.3 workplace shell isn't there either, so it's most likely character-mode/tty types))
APK
-
Free Link: Google HTML Cache
-
GOOGLE HTML CACHE
Geez, that was hard. Also has a PDF version if you don't like the colors.
-
Re:Drives
Here's the whitepaper (HTML-converted).
I'm not able to open the PDF right now to see the pretty graphs, but it says "The figure shows that failures do not increase when the average temperature increases. In fact, there is a clear trend showing that lower temperatures are associated with higher failure rates. Only at very high temperatures is there a slight reversal of this trend." However, it also notes that "What stands out are the 3 and 4-year old drives, where the trend for higher failures with higher temperature is much more constant and also more pronounced."