Slashdot Mirror

Well, then there are the physicists that say that Dark Matter is just a fudge-factor for bad mathematics.

www.autodynamics.org

Please, nobody tell the autodynamics people about this -- they'll get really depressed.

How can the icon of modern Physics be wrong? Well believe it or not, tens of thousands of physicists, engineers, scientists, and students around the world believe very strongly that Einstein is not correct. This does not Diminish Einstein in any way. His equation E=mc^2 and his Nobel Prize work on the Photo-Electric effect are still brilliant. It is simply time to move onto a greater truth.

Autodynamics

Ok, I'm double-posting this, but I really want to know what you smart physics Slashdotters think. I even got this turned down down as a "Ask Slashdot" question a couple of times!

I admit it, I am crazy and my mind entertains me.

I think I could be friends with anyone who made this statement...

Now... are you and your mind two different things and if you are not your mind, who/what are you?

While I do have a BS in Physics/Math, I lost interest in these when I became more interested in HOW it is that I solved physics problems. How do I do it? To learn about this process I study Buddhist meditation.

But, to those who still want to study physical reality, please, please, please, read the following and tell me what you think. I did read this and I think it makes Einstein almost look like an amature, but I would rather spend my energy into studying the nature of thought than alternate views on reality.

Autodynamics

Use the crackpot index for a precise quantitative description of how kooky some nutter is.

And for fun, the mistake on this page is that they try to use the Lorentz transform to find the distance between reference frames - which means nothing physically. Try to find the error on this page

Use the crackpot index for a precise quantitative description of how kooky some nutter is.

And for fun, the mistake on this page is that they try to use the Lorentz transform to find the distance between reference frames - which means nothing physically. Try to find the error on this page

http://www.autodynamics.org/

http://www.autodynamics.org/

http://www.autodynamics.org/new99/Neutrino/SuperK. html

http://www.autodynamics.org/new99/Articles/Millenn ium/index.html

http://www.autodynamics.org/

http://www.autodynamics.org/new99/Neutrino/SuperK. html

http://www.autodynamics.org/new99/Articles/Millenn ium/index.html

http://www.autodynamics.org/

http://www.autodynamics.org/new99/Neutrino/SuperK. html

http://www.autodynamics.org/new99/Articles/Millenn ium/index.html

Don't believe me? Check out the Autodynamics founders' response on the last neutrino "evidence".(Super-K) Have an open mind; think for yourself before you judge.