Slashdot Mirror

They are a type of fruit.

We find that very offensive

is an airport bathroom "behind closed doors"? i guess in a way.

http://www.badmouth.net/top-five-republican-gay-sex-scandals/

Considering that majority voters will vote for people who hold common beliefs, I do not see an issue with that.
I'm assuming you're talking about morals vs. policies. The problem with this is that people will go by the politician's professed morals, without ever trying to distinguish whether the person is guided by them. Like GWB, beloved target that he is, saying he's a Christian when, in actuality, he takes none of the normal actions one could expect of a Christian. Like saving the black people after Katrina (which I know was highly politicized by both sides rather than someone just flying in their private jet down to make an actual physical difference). Or lying, cheating, ignoring questions, pilfering and plundering our nation, etc. Dick Cheney shot someone in the face, my God. Sure, an accident. Sure. But still, it's certainly in line with their track record. I wouldn't put it past him AT ALL, would you?

this is one of the problems Democrats seemed to have, they can't connect with the people, the voters.
I think the problem Democrats have is they are fucking spineless douche-holes. They really really could benefit by applying a FEW of the Republic Party's techniques such as sticking to your message, not changing your mind based on press, actually making a commitment to do something, etc. They could work a little harder to get people like Bill Maher and Kurt Vonnegut considered more typical liberals than Michael Moore (the hot dog hog liberal) or Tim Robbins (helloooo, pompous scorn--in John Lennon glasses, no less).

The Democrats have a much bigger problem than not holding commonly-held beliefs, Sally. I notice liberals have less a pack loyalty than the conservatives. Which is possibly related to the M, W findings. But it's a big deal. There are a lot of liberals who won't vote for a candidate because of hypocrisy, which doesn't seem quite the case for conservatives, unfortunately. Conservatives are much more likely to lean towards a candidate because he doesn't look like he likes homosexuals. Which, interestingly enough, backfires quite often. Maybe if they didn't scare homos into a life of lies and deceit, they'd have a better grasp on how to identify one.

For the record, I don't intend my crude language to in any way indicate that I dislike homosexuals. I like them fine, as long as they don't vote against themselves in one way or another.

No, I didn't... it's called "Free Speech Flag": http://www.badmouth.net/free-speech-flag/ and I already posted a link to it.

Somebody created a free speech flag: http://www.badmouth.net/free-speech-flag/

I think the key is creativity. Show the absurdity of trying to ban a number. We need to rally to protect free speech. To help out, I even made a flag .