Domain: bizhat.com
Stories and comments across the archive that link to bizhat.com.
Comments · 7
-
Re:The obvious solution
I'd have thought because of noise and attenuation? Having said that I did used to run an audio cable from one side of my home to the other, never noticed any problems - but then I'm no audiophile.
Perhaps look at a bifferboard? http://bifferos.bizhat.com/
£29 for a tiny low-voltage machine that can play a wav that's being streamed over the network. Someone wrote a howto here: http://sites.google.com/site/bifferboard/Home/howto/use-bifferboard-as-network-audio-player
You'd still need to sort out speakers, and figure out a way to control it, but I'd have thought it would be fairly straight-forward to set up an IR controller or start/stop/next buttons to play a pre-defined playlist.
-
Bifferboard
Bifferboard - 1W power consumption, USB and ethernet - only 29 GBP. Runs standard x86 distributions.
-
Re:Wifi Shmi-fi
may be cia is doing it. They should have taken care of security first. http://veera.bizhat.com/
-
Re:This is news?
Do we have to use virtual glasses and other sensory support systems. I mean is it based on virtual reality. http://veera.bizhat.com/
-
Re:$82 Billion Well Spent
Not another arms race man. Now Russia may also start it. Please stop this FUD man. http://veera.bizhat.com/
-
Re:How can the Chinese become a software superpowe
I dont see them surpassing India anytime, if this is the trend... Hardware...maybe.. software
... never!A common notion has developed that Indian IT consists of software only. China emphasized this a few weeks ago when Wen Jiabao spoke fancifully about dividing up the IT market with software going to India and hardware to China, with his twin pagodas remark. I don't see India going along with this silly stereotype. Thier potential market advantages in hardware are the same as China's. Expect them to compete fiercely.
-
Re:Satellites are linear not digitalWell, there are web sites that allow you to enter your latitude and longitude and the orbital slot of a satellite, and then they do the math for you to get the azimuth and elevation. Or if you're a math geek, you can do the math yourself. Then, if you had an extremely accurate compass/inclinometer you could try to aim the antenna that way. In actual practice, I doubt that would work reliably - hitting a target the size of a car from 22,000 miles away is a very touchy business. Most pros use a compass/inclinometer to get to the right portion of the sky, and then hook up a spectrum analyzer to find the nearest satellite, and then 'stair step' across the arc until they find the bird they want. Being able to ID a satellite by its spectrum plot is a little bit of an art, but allows you to at least confirm that you're looking at a satellite. You can always hook up your IRD at that point to check of it's the right satellite. The problem with just tuning using your receiver on a digital signal, is that below a certain threshold the signal will not lock up, so be prepared to spend all day moving your dish 1/4 of a degree at a time, and waiting 30 seconds after each move to see if it locks up.
Ironically, the smaller dishes are easier to aim, since their gain is so much lower. Remember, a satellite dish is simply a telescope that operates on microwave frequencies rather than visible light, so a more powerful antenna "sees" a much smaller portion of sky, and consequently gets a much better signal. Having aligned 1.6-meter dishes and 12-meter dishes, I can attest that the 12-meter gets a great signal, but is harder to aim.