Domain: coboloncogs.org
Stories and comments across the archive that link to coboloncogs.org.
Comments · 28
-
Re:Again?
COBOL is making a comeback in the web development space: COBOL on Cogs.
-
Re:No self driving trains?
So what? Ruby is, and still it crashes all the time, too.
Clearly they need to put it on cogs then.
-
Re:COBOL and FORTRAN
> But I'm betting there's no "COBOL on RAILS" (or if there is, that's hilarious).
You got it, there is.
Well, kinda :) -
Re:In the minds of the curren tech industry
Yeah but Snapchat and Pinterest are hip, young and agile,
Don't forget they're social and cloud, with lashings of NOSQL. And at least web 3.0. Or are we up to 4.0? yet. I'm still stuck on web 2.1.6-RC4.
At least that's what goes through the mind of the current tech industry.
They probably use all the latest fads as well, too.
-
Re:A cynic's view
Obligatory link to http://www.coboloncogs.org/
-
Cobol just needs updating, like ruby on rails....
-
Re:So long/The way the future was
COBOL has a better solution.
-
Re:WaPo... Gah!
Don't worry. I'm sure it'll be easy to port it to a modern web framework like COBOL on Cogs
-
Re:SQL too
-
Re:Shit.
I've been hoping for COBOL.NET.
I guess you'll have to satisfy yourself with COBOL ON COGS in the meantime.
-
Re:Where are the C development jobs?
Hey, there's even a modern web framework for Cobol!
-
Re:Standard Slashdot Ruby comment form
Somebody out there is just itching to write C on Crack.
...or COBOL ON COGS.
-
Re:Better Idea
There is COBOL on COGS
http://www.coboloncogs.org/INDEX.HTM -
Re:Better Idea
You mean like this?
-
COBOL
New alternatives are popping up constantly but I'm going to go out on a limb and say that SQL is going to be around for a long time.
That's pretty much guaranteed. COBOL is still around.
There absolutely are better alternatives, for almost every situation. No one in their right mind starts a new system in COBOL, when they have a choice.
Yet COBOL is still around, and will be still around for awhile. So will SQL.
The only question is whether SQL will be like COBOL or like C. I could make a similar case for C being obsolete, and there are certainly many cases where a performance penalty is well worth it to get some other desired feature -- for instance, there are things I can imagine doing in Erlang that I'd never attempt in C. But people do anyway, and even modern high level languages seem to start as interpreters written in C.
Personally, I'd rather see CouchDB mature, and see SQL become more like COBOL, but that doesn't seem likely to happen soon.
-
already been done
Modern web frameworks like Cobol on Cogs already do burned-in CRT emulation and various other effects too.
;-). -
Re:Because it works.
All our interfaces to the web rely on COBOL/RPG backbones.
You should really look into a newer framework for your web interfaces: Cobol on Cogs.
-
Re:Why, what trendy buzzwords you have.
With Cogs you can keep up with many of the latest buzzwords.
-
COBOL on Cogs
-
COBOL on Cogs
-
Re:Expert sex change, again?it's called stack overflow and people expect it to look pretty? Personally, I would expect the site to look like the Cobol on Cogs site with a name like that.
I hate the Yahoo Answers site, and this looks like its going to be a version of that for computer related questions.
"Best subversion client for Mac OS?"
(how bout svn you dope)
"What is the single most effective way to keep from getting Slashdotted"
(I won't even comment on this)Personally I can't wait until the relationship questions come up. "How do I get a girl?" "What do boobs feel like?" hehe.
-
Re:What COBOL really needs
-
Re:What COBOL really needs
Its not Cobol on Rails. Its Cobol on Cogs
-
Re:What COBOL really needsWhat COBOL really needs is a hip new framework to make it "cool", just like Ruby!
Then you will love Cobol on Cogs.
-
Re:What COBOL really needs
You mean like Cobol on Cogs?
:) -
Re:What COBOL really needs
How about Cobol On Cogs?
-
Re:what?
Not pure COBOL, though. It's COBOL ON COGS.
-
Re:Series/1 emulation
Oh yeah, I think I've used that web interface.