cyberbunker.com · Domains · Slashdot Mirror

Re:Alleged attempts to enter the bunker by force. by Eunuchswear · 2013-03-27 13:28 · Score: 1 · on Largest DDoS In History Reaches 300 Billion Bits Per Second

You realize Cyberbunker is situated in a bunker designed to survive a nuclear war. It was designed to function independently for 10 years.

It doesn't seem to have been designed to resist a slashdot attack.

Can't get to their site to see if they claim "10 years", but it's crap.

Look at some of the major bunkers, for example http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Central_Government_War_Headquarters

"Blast-proof and completely self-sufficient, the complex could accommodate up to 4,000 people in complete isolation from the outside world for up to three months. "

Three months. Not ten years.

Re:I have an idea by c0lo · 2013-03-27 02:45 · Score: 1 · on Largest DDoS In History Reaches 300 Billion Bits Per Second

Dutch authorities and the police have made several attempts to enter the bunker by force but failed to do so.

Cut off their electricity. That can't last real long even if they have generators and they can easily do it from outside. How stupid are they? "Ok guys, let's just give up and go home. The door is really thick." What a bunch of morons.

Ummm... cyberbunker's general FAQ, last one reads:

Yes, there are several cyberbunkers located in various countries

Re:Alleged attempts to enter the bunker by force. by Gorath99 · 2013-03-27 02:29 · Score: 1 · on Largest DDoS In History Reaches 300 Billion Bits Per Second

You realize Cyberbunker is situated in a bunker designed to survive a nuclear war. It was designed to function independently for 10 years. Not sure how long that would work with the servers at full load, but i'd think they could still run their generators for quite some time without interruption.

Sure. Is a great way to spend a couple years in a small concrete room with no internet or other contact with the outside world. (You don't think the police won't cut the phone and internet, do you?) Much more efficient than letting the police in and getting a trial first. ;-)

Re:Bunker by Psyborgue · 2013-03-27 02:05 · Score: 1 · on Largest DDoS In History Reaches 300 Billion Bits Per Second

According to their specs it has air tight rooms and Nuclear/Biological/Chemical (NBC) air filtration. I don't think tear gas would do much of anything.

Re:Cyberbunker fended off the Dutch SWAT? by Psyborgue · 2013-03-27 02:02 · Score: 1 · on Largest DDoS In History Reaches 300 Billion Bits Per Second

See here for links to two seperate accounts of attempts at police action. It seems there was a misunderstanding with the local authorities over their use of a hardened bunker as a data center but it was later cleared up. Given they've hosted some torrent sites, I don't find it unreasonable to think these accounts might be accurate. Just ask Kim Dotcom or TPB whether SWAT is out of the question.

Re:Alleged attempts to enter the bunker by force. by Psyborgue · 2013-03-27 01:59 · Score: 3, Interesting · on Largest DDoS In History Reaches 300 Billion Bits Per Second

You realize Cyberbunker is situated in a bunker designed to survive a nuclear war. It was designed to function independently for 10 years. Not sure how long that would work with the servers at full load, but i'd think they could still run their generators for quite some time without interruption.

Re:Cyberbunker fended off the Dutch SWAT? by Njovich · 2013-03-27 01:58 · Score: 1 · on Largest DDoS In History Reaches 300 Billion Bits Per Second

Here it is: http://cyberbunker.com/web/swat.php

Not sure what to make of this, doesn't directly sound like something that actually happened. But well, who knows.

Re:Bunker by Psyborgue · 2013-03-27 01:46 · Score: 4, Informative · on Largest DDoS In History Reaches 300 Billion Bits Per Second

It is a bunker. And it's not so simple, as this swat team discovered.

Really??? by www.sorehands.com · 2011-10-14 05:07 · Score: 1 · on Dutch ISP Files Police Complaint Against Spamhaus

I don't see their "abuse policy" that you post.

What I do see on http://cyberbunker.com/disaster-free-hosting.html is:
"As long as your hosting fee is paid CyberBunker will do anything in its power to keep your servers up. In addition CyberBunker protects your servers also from others who might want to take your servers down like the DMCA, your competitors, authorities, burglars, governments and terrorists. "

Because! by www.sorehands.com · 2011-10-14 04:18 · Score: 1 · on Dutch ISP Files Police Complaint Against Spamhaus

Because their spamming customers are the ones who send the spam.

It is clear, from their own admissions, that Cyberbunker is a spam supporting service. Its no matter what service means that when Cyberbunker receives spam complaints, Cyberbunker will ignore the complaints.

See the Cyberbunker "Mind your own business" policy:

http://cyberbunker.com/disaster-free-hosting.html

"Most of our customers desire to stay anonymous. In some cases we do not even know who our customers actually are. We have no idea and we
simply do not care. Who ever you are, it is our business to keep you online."
---
"CyberBunker does not poke around on your servers. Customers are allowed to host any content they like, except child porn and anything related to terrorism. Everything else is fine. CyberBunker has adopted a policy not to mind our clients business. Our famous "Mind Your Own Business" policy."

Here's one .... I suspect. by Anonymous Coward · 2006-12-11 13:36 · Score: 0 · on Criminals Target Tech Students With Job Offers

http://future-resourcing.com/

coming out of the netherlands from this place

http://www.cyberbunker.com/

a place with an interesting history

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CyberBunker

run by this guy

http://www.xennt.com/

who is responsible for creating this

http://www.unifiedroot.com/

backed by an internet notable ....

http://www.unifiedroot.com/dynroot/page_100/