Slashdot Mirror

The New York Times quotes it here: http://www.nytimes.com/2007/10/25/science/25jacobson.html?ex=1351051200&en=e4cb25d3a3117e03&ei=5088&partner=rssnyt&emc=rss as coming from http://evolution-facts.org/

And Christ said "render unto Ceasar what is Ceasar's".. I would agree, however, the modern day Caesar also wants what is yours. If I remember the Bible correctly, it also says not to offer sacrifices to idols. Daniel would not offer sacrifices or bow down to the Babylonian idol. But OK one can 86 this man if they want, but there are plenty of scientists who happen to agree with him. Another website called http://www.evolution-facts.org/ gives plenty of more scientific evidence against evolution. Some of the scientific evidence just happens to be in my area of expertise, and is valid.

On the opposite end of the temperature divide, the species living inside the core of Sol already have cold fusion and use it regularly. It's too bad your whole premise relies on evolution being real. There are studies out there that show that the time required for the human species to evolve doesn't equal the age of the Earth, in fact it outlives the age of the Earth thereby making evolution not possible. Making the proteins hot doesn't make them evolve faster; in fact they might just evaporate. http://evolution-facts.org/Ev-Crunch/c05.htm

First I would like to point out that ID is falsifiable just as Evolution is falsifiable; as a matter of fact they are opposites of each other, in other words, if you prove one you disprove the other, this has been stated by many atheists.

Quote:
Evolutionist Quote of the Week

"Christianity has fought, still fights, and will fight science to the desperate end over evolution, because evolution destroys utterly and finally the very reason Jesus' earthly life was supposedly made necessary. Destroy Adam and Eve and the original sin, and in the rubble you will find the sorry remains of the son of god. Take away the meaning of his death. If Jesus was not the redeemer that died for our sins, and this is what evolution means, then Christianity is nothing."

- G. Richard Bozarth, The Meaning of Evolution, American Atheist, p. 30, Sept. 20, 1979.

For all of you who have not taken the time to actually delve in to the finer points of irreducibly complex systems here is an article that might help:

Notice the credentials of the author:
Joseph W. Francis
Associate Professor of Biology
Cedarville College, Ohio

http://www.arn.org/docs/odesign/od201/peeringdbb20 1.htm

I believe this man is no different than you or I in that he is in all security doing the best job he can and following the facts as he sees them.

Scientists speak about evolution:

"As by this theory, innumerable transitional forms must have existed. Why do we not find them embedded in the crust of the earth? Why is not all nature in confusion [of halfway species] instead of being, as we see them, well-defined species?"--*Charles Darwin

http://www.pathlights.com/ce_encyclopedia/01-evol1 .htm#top

More information about evolution the atheists don't want you to know:

http://evolution-facts.org/

More links:

http://www.icr.org/
http://www.trueorigin.org/ca_rh_03.asp
http://www.setterfield.org/simplified.html
http://www.origins.org/
http://www.trueorigin.org/

One of my favorites: "The Origin of Language and Communication"
http://www.trueorigin.org/language01.asp

I understand you will dismiss the authority of these scientists because the day they admit they are a Christian they all of a sudden become blabbering idiots. It reminds me of a friend of mine who teaches hand-to-hand combat to the special forces, he upset his teacher and his teacher demoted him from 7th degree black belt to white belt, like all of a sudden his knowledge was sucked out of him by magic, he is still one of the toughest guys I know, LOL.

BTW - Having a formal education in physics, and three engineering disciplines I was very skeptical when I came across this information. The problem was, as a scientist, I was curious and the more I studied the more I realized these other scientists weren't a bunch of crackpots. These scientists felt so strongly about what they had learned they sacrificed their careers in order to pursue alternate scientific postulations of the given data.

Given limited resources, they have driven discoveries in the field of science that the current university system has totally ignored because of the atheistic agenda. This is the very system that puts boundaries on scientific study based on personal beliefs and the ACLUs control by amending our constitution with Thomas Jefferson's unofficial letters to justify their atheistic position.

I think it is a sad state of affairs when an atheistic or

I'd disagreee with the majority of these posts... evolution is a fact. Species do in fact change over time.

Natural selection is the theory that suggests how evolution occurs.

In checking out the site in the parent post, I ran across this interesting comment:

Can anyone, viewing a hummingbird in action and knowing that all its hundreds of organs are packed inside something the size of a marble, believe the myth that, way back, it originated when a lightning bolt hit some dirty seawater?

I'm having problems finding exactly where in Darwin's Origin of Species this claim is made? Perhaps someone can enlighten me. Or is this just another creationist strawman?

For those interested in another point of view, This book has some fascinating information.

Look who's believing in fairy tales.

molecules-to-man evolution - the 150-year orthodoxy of fundamentalist materialism

(It's actually a lot older than 150 years. The idea is at least as old as Mayan religion, but Charles Darwin helped to revive it in the mid 1800s by telling fanciful tales as though they might be true.)

Science is not a religion, but it has been hijacked by a religion -- materialists who [mis]define the accepted realm and scope of "real" science and wield it to propagate their atheist/humanist worldview. It exists mostly as a heterodoxy of Biblical orthodoxy, in the hopes that humanists can have a similar bedrock foundation to provide legitimacy to atheism and licentiousness.

There is an Inquisition of sorts going on. Convert, conform, assimilate to the "scientific" orthodoxy, or be persecuted.

This plot goes back quite a bit further - to 1000 AD. To see it click here.