Slashdot Mirror

This is a fact that is now accepted across the political spectrum.

But not the technical spectrum. g-2.space.

Guccifer 2.0 was a fake. He releases some unimportant docs to mimic the original, real guy and then just happens to act as Russian as possible.

More info here.

The independent researchers cited in that article, Forensicator and Adam Carter, were talking about what Guccifer2.0 leaked in September, not what Wikileaks released in July.

Adam Carter wrote this, where he said:

[...] this was metadata from the 'leaked' files, which Guccifer 2.0 released in September of 2016 and had absolutely nothing to do with Wikileaks , this conflation of Wikileaks and Guccifer 2.0 is a mistake many in the MSM have made throughout 2016-2017 and one I had hoped some may have learned from but evidently they haven't.

The emphasis is his.

Strong Analysis supporting this claim. It was an inside leak. This is pretty close to damning evidence. Compare it to the evidence supplied by the Democratic Leadership in charge of the IC pinning it on Russia.

I don't support Russia, or anything associated with the authoritarian regime of Russia and it's leadership. That does not mean I simply accept allegations that "Russia did it" for everything the Democrats and Democratic Party's praetorian guard media wants to claim either.

Is it possible that Russia had something to do with the breach? Sure, it's also possible an insider fed up with the corruption is responsible for the breach. I have yet to see compelling evidence pinning any of these breaches on Russia. I have yet to see anything in the way of anecdotal evidence that would lead to a compelling "Russia did it" either. What I have seen is a whole lot of claims which don't stand up to basic scrutiny.

We have a paid-for DNC report from a private company making the claim being repeated by Democratic politicians as "fact". Yet a request by the FBI to investigate the server being denied by the DNC. If they are so sure, why didn't they let the largest Federal Law Enforcement agency investigate for validation?

Maybe it was Russia. Show us the evidence (not an allegation made by a company paid by the DNC) and I'll be right on board with bitching about them nasty Russians. There is enough dirty with the DNC and politicians from the last administration that people _should_ be skeptical until such evidence is provided. (If you don't think anything is dirty, you are not even trying and rational discourse is impossible. Colluding to oust Sanders, Lynch on the tarmac, Comey's actions, Huma Abedin, and Wasserman Shultz are easy, but not only subjects for you to read about. )

The evidence and analysis that report is based on. Pretty legit.

Here is Adam Carter's evidence and analysis that The Nation article is based on. It's pretty damned legit.

Strong Analysis supporting this claim. It was an inside leak. This is pretty close to damning evidence. Compare it to the evidence supplied by the IC pinning it on Russia.

Here is some pretty strong evidence that it was an inside leak. Much stronger than anything the IC ever provided pinning it on Russia.

They did not hack it and yes they are accused of doing it. It's pretty conclusively an inside leak and a (inept) coverup blaming it on the Russians.

If you want to see analysis and evidence that comes pretty close to proof that it was an internal leak, look here.

Here is the analysis that that article is based on. Looks pretty legit.

Here is Adam Carter's Evidence>

This is what actual evidence and analysis looks like. Unlike what was presented by the Intelligence Community. I'd like to see someone send a 2 gigabyte file archive from DC to Romania via VPN in 87 seconds, even today. Until I see proof that that's even possible, I'm going with Adam Carter.

I don't know if it was Seth Rich, but it's pretty clear it was a leak from within the DNC. Evidence and Analysis>

Forensicator and Adam Carter have provided much stronger evidence and analysis that is was a leak from the inside and a coverup that tried to pin it on the Russians. Look here with an open mind>

Guccifer 2.0 isn't even a hacker. G2 is a DNC operative, or maybe a Clinton campaign operative, whose purpose is to delegitimize Trump's win over Clinton, even if that means war with Russia. The documents he shared were unimportant and not the least bit damaging, and his interpretation of them was comically backwards, and nobody but the alt press and Trump fans were fooled, to much amusement everywhere else.

Guccifer 2.0: Game Over

Because no-one has mentioned it yet.