Domain: jedsoft.org
Stories and comments across the archive that link to jedsoft.org.
Comments · 13
-
Re:About time
But most people prefer neither less nor more. Why settle for less?
-
Re:True, but...
That is why I use most.
-
Re:Mine
less - the pager of pagers. With a proper lessopen/pipe, you can do what no man has done before. You can go backwards in files, although I guess some 'more's can do this now. Less always can. It also highlights text searches
Why have less or more, when you can have mosthttp://www.jedsoft.org/most/ I just find it easier to use and it handles binary files. -
Quantian articleI own the quantian.org domain. The following is from my article on the Quantian Distribution. Here is a brief run down of links, programs, and other goodies in Quantian.
- R, including several add-on packages (such as tseries, RODBC, coda, mcmcpack, gtkdevice, rgtk, rquantlib, qtl, dbi, rmysql), out-of-the box support for the powerful ESS modes for XEmacs as well as the Ggobi visualisation program;
- A complete teTeX, TeX, and LaTeX setup for scientific publishing, along with TeXmacs and LyX for wysiwyg editing;
- Perl and Python with loads of add-ons, plus ruby, tcl, Lua, and Scientific and Numeric Python;
- The Emacs and Vim editors, as well as Gnumeric, kate, Koffice, jed, joe, nedit and zile;
- Octave, with add-on packages octave-forge, octave-sp, octave-epstk, and matwrap;
- Computer-algebra systems Maxima, Pari/GP, GAP, GiNaC and YaCaS;
- the QuantLib quantitative finance library including its Python interface;
- GSL, the Gnu Scientific Library (GSL) including example binaries;
- The GNU compiler suite comprising gcc, g77, g++ compilers;
- the OpenDX, Plotmtv, and Mayavi data visualisation systems;
- it includes apcalc,aribas,autoclass,
-
Re:More or Less ? [OT]
There's also most.
-
Some of my favourites
Let's start with the shell--zsh is by far the best one I've used. It has everything.
Moving on, Links (web browser) and Naim (AIM/ICQ/IRC client) rock. The only issue with the former is that Links doesn't support cookies, so I have Lynx in case I want to post on /. or something.
I don't have a console mail client on my machine--I have other methods of getting my email. For accessing my email account with my uni, I ssh into my uni's shell account and use pine from there or I use Links to access the Squirrelmail setup on my web server (over HTTPS, of course). To access my fastmail.fm account, I just use Links to access their web interface (they support both web and IMAP access for free).
For downloading stuff, I use giFTcurs, the btdownloadcurses.py BitTorrent client, and the venerable wget, depending on what I'm looking for and where I'm downloading from.
And, for the part that will generate the most flamage, my text editor of choice: Joe! Its interface is just as simple as nano, but with more features, such as find/replace and decent copy/paste, using text selection. On a related note, I use most as my pager--coloured man pages are good.
And, finally, who could forget NetHack?
Hmm...now I have an urge to find out how to make live CDs, so I can make a ``CLI survival kit'' live CD. Well, maybe not, as I'm too bloody lazy, but it's an idea... -
JOE? How about JED?
Oh sure, JOE gets on the front page of Slashdot. How about JED? It's like the missing editor that Emacs never had. It's also got built-in S-Lang scripting, has built-in syntax highlighting, session recovery, drop-down menus, and has been ported to many platforms.
I guess if we're going to whore our favorites, go here to learn more about JED. -
Re:Anyone have a replica of MS-DOS EDITOR?
-
Re:Why shell?
Why settle for less, if you can settle on most?
Yeah, most's feature list is pretty impressive. And just look at the screenshots!!!
-
Re:Why shell?
Why settle for less, if you can settle on most?
Yeah, most's feature list is pretty impressive. And just look at the screenshots!!!
-
Re:Why shell?
Why settle for less, if you can settle on most?
Yeah, most's feature list is pretty impressive. And just look at the screenshots!!!
-
Re:Why shell?
No. You do not have to settle for less. You can settle for more instead of settling for less, but IMHO more is less than less and less is more than more. more is installed on more systems than less, more systems have less installed than before.
Why settle for less, if you can settle on most? -
Re:What other control-key command editors?
Jed does Wordstar keystrokes. Also does Emacs (keystrokes). Unlimited configuration possibilities. Available in Red Hat and Slackware and probably most other good distributions. Look here.