Slashdot Mirror
Domain: mediabiasfactcheck.com
Stories and comments across the archive that link to mediabiasfactcheck.com.
Comments · 11
-
Re: Why this one video
Just the facts, man.
AhahahahahahahaNo. Your source is bad, and you should feel bad.
Just because they call themselves "non-partisan" doesn't mean that they actually are.
Biased or not, his source cites the Washington Post, among others. Is that a right-wing rag to you?
Facts remain facts regardless of the bias of the person stating them.
You make it sound like the Washington Post citation supports his assertion. It doesn't.
-
Re: Why this one video
Just the facts, man.
AhahahahahahahaNo. Your source is bad, and you should feel bad.
Just because they call themselves "non-partisan" doesn't mean that they actually are.
Biased or not, his source cites the Washington Post, among others. Is that a right-wing rag to you?
Facts remain facts regardless of the bias of the person stating them.
-
Re: Why this one video
Just the facts, man.
AhahahahahahahaNo. Your source is bad, and you should feel bad.
Just because they call themselves "non-partisan" doesn't mean that they actually are.
-
Re: And there's the opposite side of the coin
What is true is that normally when people refer to SJWs they're saying they're vaguely left wing and vaguely concerned about racism or sexism. Vice definitely does not fall under that category - it's usually the target of people with those concerns, not a ally to them.
If we're talking about this Vice, they are left center.
Vice being involved in scandals related to racism and sexism doesn't make them not left leaning. It makes them hypocrites.
-
Re:Found the Fox News retard.
I guess that's why The Hill, a left-of-center site, reported that the BBC, Fox News, and PBS were the most trusted news brands. And that CNN brought up the rear. That's probably why Fox has more viewers than CNN and MSNBC - combined.
-
Re:All fluff and no substance
FWIW, here is how your expectations line up with mediabiasfactcheck.com:
Wall Street Journal: Highly Factual, Center-Right
https://mediabiasfactcheck.com...New York Times: Highly Factual, Center-Left
https://mediabiasfactcheck.com...New Yorker: High Factual, Left
https://mediabiasfactcheck.com...Whether or not it's their bias or your bias, you seem to view all of those sites one rank to the left relative to how they rate them.
-
Re:All fluff and no substance
FWIW, here is how your expectations line up with mediabiasfactcheck.com:
Wall Street Journal: Highly Factual, Center-Right
https://mediabiasfactcheck.com...New York Times: Highly Factual, Center-Left
https://mediabiasfactcheck.com...New Yorker: High Factual, Left
https://mediabiasfactcheck.com...Whether or not it's their bias or your bias, you seem to view all of those sites one rank to the left relative to how they rate them.
-
Re:All fluff and no substance
FWIW, here is how your expectations line up with mediabiasfactcheck.com:
Wall Street Journal: Highly Factual, Center-Right
https://mediabiasfactcheck.com...New York Times: Highly Factual, Center-Left
https://mediabiasfactcheck.com...New Yorker: High Factual, Left
https://mediabiasfactcheck.com...Whether or not it's their bias or your bias, you seem to view all of those sites one rank to the left relative to how they rate them.
-
Re:This government needs even MORE power!
Yes, enlightenment is good. Single-payer in CA isn't dead; it's tabled until it's done correctly - http://www.latimes.com/politic...
Judicial Watch, Inc. appears to be rather biased, as evidenced by the below:
https://mediabiasfactcheck.com...
http://www.snopes.com/dhs-quie...
http://www.politifact.com/pers...
I'd take their filings with a grain of salt...or two or three. -
Truepundit is a conspiracy-pseudoscience site
https://mediabiasfactcheck.com...
CONSPIRACY-PSEUDOSCIENCE
Sources in the Conspiracy-Pseudoscience category may publish unverifiable information that is not always supported by evidence. These sources may be untrustworthy for credible/verifiable information, therefore fact checking and further investigation is recommended on a per article basis when obtaining information from these sources. See all Conspiracy-Pseudoscience sources.
Factual Reporting: MIXED
Notes: Though they do occasionally publish a legitimate story, some are conspiracies. This source also currently delivers news straight from the Daily Caller which has a strong right-wing bias. Most articles from True Pundit have anonymous authors. This source has also been flagged for false information and has an unproven claim. Simply not trustworthy.
It's the kind of site that dreams up "Pizzagate" conspiracies when it's not too busy reposting other conspiracy loons' vague "new world order" conspiracies.
-
Re:I'm truly amazed
Ah. A massive conspiracy. I should have guessed. OTOH perhaps travel restrictions != travel ban