Domain: mithuro.com
Stories and comments across the archive that link to mithuro.com.
Comments · 987
-
Trusted and Microsoft in the Same sentence'nuff said.
Moderate this comment
Negative: Offtopic Flamebait Troll Redundant
Positive: Insightful Interesting Informative Funny -
Trusted and Microsoft in the Same sentence'nuff said.
Moderate this comment
Negative: Offtopic Flamebait Troll Redundant
Positive: Insightful Interesting Informative Funny -
Trusted and Microsoft in the Same sentence'nuff said.
Moderate this comment
Negative: Offtopic Flamebait Troll Redundant
Positive: Insightful Interesting Informative Funny -
Trusted and Microsoft in the Same sentence'nuff said.
Moderate this comment
Negative: Offtopic Flamebait Troll Redundant
Positive: Insightful Interesting Informative Funny -
Trusted and Microsoft in the Same sentence'nuff said.
Moderate this comment
Negative: Offtopic Flamebait Troll Redundant
Positive: Insightful Interesting Informative Funny -
WARNING: LIBERTARIAN TROLL ON THE LOOSEThere's a guy who's trolling around trolling links to a certain mithuro.com site.
He is trying to promote libertarian agenda.
This is a warning to all who read slashdot to avoid clicking his links at all costs.
Currently he uses two nicknames
myownkidney
amigoroLET'S MOD THIS TROLL OUT OF SLASHDOT
-
MOD DOWN TROLL
This is the same mithuro.com Troll. MOD HIM DOWN!
-
TROLL MOD HIM DOWN
This is the same mithuro.com Troll. MOD HIM DOWN!
-
MOD SPAMMING PARENT DOWN!
Sir, why do you need to post nine links to your tard website in one post? Is it so that you can get more opportunities to rake in Google ad clicks?
-
Microsoft CrimesFrom Analysing of the NY Times article: a letter in which Bill Gates, Microsoft's chairman, the chief executive of Intel at the time, that any support given to the Go Corporation,would be considered an aggressive move against Microsoft.
If this is not anti-competitive, then what is?Microsoft violated a signed secrecy agreement with Go and showed that Microsoft possessed technical documents from Go that it should not have had access to.
Industrial Espionage.Microsoft violated nondisclosure agreements with Go, and then used that information to build PenWindows, a competitor to Go's PenPoint operating system.
GO has loyalty rights for PenWindows. GO should sue PenWindows licensee's individually. This is what Microsoft is trying to do to Linux users through SCO. GO has more legal grounds to stand on that SCO.Shortly after the letter was written, Intel reduced its planned investment in Go from $10 million to $2 million
Intel was held to ransom, and they paid it.The advice read in part that the focus should be shifted from "killing the competitor" to "providing a better solution to the customer's problems."
So they did believe in Killing Competition. A tiger never changes its stripes.I think some of these allegations could ammount to criminal offences. I do hope Mr. Gates does a time in a cell with No Windows
Moderate this comment
Negative: Offtopic Flamebait Troll Redundant
Positive: Insightful Interesting Informative Funny -
Microsoft CrimesFrom Analysing of the NY Times article: a letter in which Bill Gates, Microsoft's chairman, the chief executive of Intel at the time, that any support given to the Go Corporation,would be considered an aggressive move against Microsoft.
If this is not anti-competitive, then what is?Microsoft violated a signed secrecy agreement with Go and showed that Microsoft possessed technical documents from Go that it should not have had access to.
Industrial Espionage.Microsoft violated nondisclosure agreements with Go, and then used that information to build PenWindows, a competitor to Go's PenPoint operating system.
GO has loyalty rights for PenWindows. GO should sue PenWindows licensee's individually. This is what Microsoft is trying to do to Linux users through SCO. GO has more legal grounds to stand on that SCO.Shortly after the letter was written, Intel reduced its planned investment in Go from $10 million to $2 million
Intel was held to ransom, and they paid it.The advice read in part that the focus should be shifted from "killing the competitor" to "providing a better solution to the customer's problems."
So they did believe in Killing Competition. A tiger never changes its stripes.I think some of these allegations could ammount to criminal offences. I do hope Mr. Gates does a time in a cell with No Windows
Moderate this comment
Negative: Offtopic Flamebait Troll Redundant
Positive: Insightful Interesting Informative Funny -
Microsoft CrimesFrom Analysing of the NY Times article: a letter in which Bill Gates, Microsoft's chairman, the chief executive of Intel at the time, that any support given to the Go Corporation,would be considered an aggressive move against Microsoft.
If this is not anti-competitive, then what is?Microsoft violated a signed secrecy agreement with Go and showed that Microsoft possessed technical documents from Go that it should not have had access to.
Industrial Espionage.Microsoft violated nondisclosure agreements with Go, and then used that information to build PenWindows, a competitor to Go's PenPoint operating system.
GO has loyalty rights for PenWindows. GO should sue PenWindows licensee's individually. This is what Microsoft is trying to do to Linux users through SCO. GO has more legal grounds to stand on that SCO.Shortly after the letter was written, Intel reduced its planned investment in Go from $10 million to $2 million
Intel was held to ransom, and they paid it.The advice read in part that the focus should be shifted from "killing the competitor" to "providing a better solution to the customer's problems."
So they did believe in Killing Competition. A tiger never changes its stripes.I think some of these allegations could ammount to criminal offences. I do hope Mr. Gates does a time in a cell with No Windows
Moderate this comment
Negative: Offtopic Flamebait Troll Redundant
Positive: Insightful Interesting Informative Funny -
Microsoft CrimesFrom Analysing of the NY Times article: a letter in which Bill Gates, Microsoft's chairman, the chief executive of Intel at the time, that any support given to the Go Corporation,would be considered an aggressive move against Microsoft.
If this is not anti-competitive, then what is?Microsoft violated a signed secrecy agreement with Go and showed that Microsoft possessed technical documents from Go that it should not have had access to.
Industrial Espionage.Microsoft violated nondisclosure agreements with Go, and then used that information to build PenWindows, a competitor to Go's PenPoint operating system.
GO has loyalty rights for PenWindows. GO should sue PenWindows licensee's individually. This is what Microsoft is trying to do to Linux users through SCO. GO has more legal grounds to stand on that SCO.Shortly after the letter was written, Intel reduced its planned investment in Go from $10 million to $2 million
Intel was held to ransom, and they paid it.The advice read in part that the focus should be shifted from "killing the competitor" to "providing a better solution to the customer's problems."
So they did believe in Killing Competition. A tiger never changes its stripes.I think some of these allegations could ammount to criminal offences. I do hope Mr. Gates does a time in a cell with No Windows
Moderate this comment
Negative: Offtopic Flamebait Troll Redundant
Positive: Insightful Interesting Informative Funny -
Microsoft CrimesFrom Analysing of the NY Times article: a letter in which Bill Gates, Microsoft's chairman, the chief executive of Intel at the time, that any support given to the Go Corporation,would be considered an aggressive move against Microsoft.
If this is not anti-competitive, then what is?Microsoft violated a signed secrecy agreement with Go and showed that Microsoft possessed technical documents from Go that it should not have had access to.
Industrial Espionage.Microsoft violated nondisclosure agreements with Go, and then used that information to build PenWindows, a competitor to Go's PenPoint operating system.
GO has loyalty rights for PenWindows. GO should sue PenWindows licensee's individually. This is what Microsoft is trying to do to Linux users through SCO. GO has more legal grounds to stand on that SCO.Shortly after the letter was written, Intel reduced its planned investment in Go from $10 million to $2 million
Intel was held to ransom, and they paid it.The advice read in part that the focus should be shifted from "killing the competitor" to "providing a better solution to the customer's problems."
So they did believe in Killing Competition. A tiger never changes its stripes.I think some of these allegations could ammount to criminal offences. I do hope Mr. Gates does a time in a cell with No Windows
Moderate this comment
Negative: Offtopic Flamebait Troll Redundant
Positive: Insightful Interesting Informative Funny -
Microsoft CrimesFrom Analysing of the NY Times article: a letter in which Bill Gates, Microsoft's chairman, the chief executive of Intel at the time, that any support given to the Go Corporation,would be considered an aggressive move against Microsoft.
If this is not anti-competitive, then what is?Microsoft violated a signed secrecy agreement with Go and showed that Microsoft possessed technical documents from Go that it should not have had access to.
Industrial Espionage.Microsoft violated nondisclosure agreements with Go, and then used that information to build PenWindows, a competitor to Go's PenPoint operating system.
GO has loyalty rights for PenWindows. GO should sue PenWindows licensee's individually. This is what Microsoft is trying to do to Linux users through SCO. GO has more legal grounds to stand on that SCO.Shortly after the letter was written, Intel reduced its planned investment in Go from $10 million to $2 million
Intel was held to ransom, and they paid it.The advice read in part that the focus should be shifted from "killing the competitor" to "providing a better solution to the customer's problems."
So they did believe in Killing Competition. A tiger never changes its stripes.I think some of these allegations could ammount to criminal offences. I do hope Mr. Gates does a time in a cell with No Windows
Moderate this comment
Negative: Offtopic Flamebait Troll Redundant
Positive: Insightful Interesting Informative Funny -
Microsoft CrimesFrom Analysing of the NY Times article: a letter in which Bill Gates, Microsoft's chairman, the chief executive of Intel at the time, that any support given to the Go Corporation,would be considered an aggressive move against Microsoft.
If this is not anti-competitive, then what is?Microsoft violated a signed secrecy agreement with Go and showed that Microsoft possessed technical documents from Go that it should not have had access to.
Industrial Espionage.Microsoft violated nondisclosure agreements with Go, and then used that information to build PenWindows, a competitor to Go's PenPoint operating system.
GO has loyalty rights for PenWindows. GO should sue PenWindows licensee's individually. This is what Microsoft is trying to do to Linux users through SCO. GO has more legal grounds to stand on that SCO.Shortly after the letter was written, Intel reduced its planned investment in Go from $10 million to $2 million
Intel was held to ransom, and they paid it.The advice read in part that the focus should be shifted from "killing the competitor" to "providing a better solution to the customer's problems."
So they did believe in Killing Competition. A tiger never changes its stripes.I think some of these allegations could ammount to criminal offences. I do hope Mr. Gates does a time in a cell with No Windows
Moderate this comment
Negative: Offtopic Flamebait Troll Redundant
Positive: Insightful Interesting Informative Funny -
Microsoft CrimesFrom Analysing of the NY Times article: a letter in which Bill Gates, Microsoft's chairman, the chief executive of Intel at the time, that any support given to the Go Corporation,would be considered an aggressive move against Microsoft.
If this is not anti-competitive, then what is?Microsoft violated a signed secrecy agreement with Go and showed that Microsoft possessed technical documents from Go that it should not have had access to.
Industrial Espionage.Microsoft violated nondisclosure agreements with Go, and then used that information to build PenWindows, a competitor to Go's PenPoint operating system.
GO has loyalty rights for PenWindows. GO should sue PenWindows licensee's individually. This is what Microsoft is trying to do to Linux users through SCO. GO has more legal grounds to stand on that SCO.Shortly after the letter was written, Intel reduced its planned investment in Go from $10 million to $2 million
Intel was held to ransom, and they paid it.The advice read in part that the focus should be shifted from "killing the competitor" to "providing a better solution to the customer's problems."
So they did believe in Killing Competition. A tiger never changes its stripes.I think some of these allegations could ammount to criminal offences. I do hope Mr. Gates does a time in a cell with No Windows
Moderate this comment
Negative: Offtopic Flamebait Troll Redundant
Positive: Insightful Interesting Informative Funny -
This has everything that Diebold Lacks
Diebold: I quote: fraud-prone, blackbox, proprietary, expensive, idiosyncratic, unreliable
OVC: I quote:technically sound, accurate, secure, inexpensive, uniform and open voting system
That really sums it up.
If you don't believe me try a demo of the Diebold voting system
DIEBOLD: Boldling rigging where no man's rigged before
(Well... Let's not talk about the presidential election 2004) -
Publicity Stunt By Linux GeeksHonestly, this is all bullshit. We know that this was publicity stunt by the Linux Geeks to get more airtime on the news. I bet they are secretly funding SCO. How do you explain SCO not going bust when it should've done so many years ago.
Sad to see Microsoft falling for this trick and giving money to SCO. This will only fuel the geek arguments.
These geeks have no life. They spend all day and all night compiling Linux kernels, watching sci-fi, reading LOTR cover to cover and fantasizing about Natalie Portman naked and Petrified. This whole SCO thing made the world look at the geeks in a different light. Now they are seen as "defenders" of some faith or whatever. These geeks really need to find some women and get laid. That will solve all these problems once and for all.
I know I will get modded -2 for this. Slashdot is all about Linux herdthink. I know they hate reality and truth. Because the truth is, the Geeks live in their dream world where Linux reigns supreme. Well guess what dudes!
I had a choice: Linux or Life. I chose Life.
Moderate this comment
Negative: Offtopic Flamebait Troll Redundant
Positive: Insightful Interesting Informative Funny -
Publicity Stunt By Linux GeeksHonestly, this is all bullshit. We know that this was publicity stunt by the Linux Geeks to get more airtime on the news. I bet they are secretly funding SCO. How do you explain SCO not going bust when it should've done so many years ago.
Sad to see Microsoft falling for this trick and giving money to SCO. This will only fuel the geek arguments.
These geeks have no life. They spend all day and all night compiling Linux kernels, watching sci-fi, reading LOTR cover to cover and fantasizing about Natalie Portman naked and Petrified. This whole SCO thing made the world look at the geeks in a different light. Now they are seen as "defenders" of some faith or whatever. These geeks really need to find some women and get laid. That will solve all these problems once and for all.
I know I will get modded -2 for this. Slashdot is all about Linux herdthink. I know they hate reality and truth. Because the truth is, the Geeks live in their dream world where Linux reigns supreme. Well guess what dudes!
I had a choice: Linux or Life. I chose Life.
Moderate this comment
Negative: Offtopic Flamebait Troll Redundant
Positive: Insightful Interesting Informative Funny -
Publicity Stunt By Linux GeeksHonestly, this is all bullshit. We know that this was publicity stunt by the Linux Geeks to get more airtime on the news. I bet they are secretly funding SCO. How do you explain SCO not going bust when it should've done so many years ago.
Sad to see Microsoft falling for this trick and giving money to SCO. This will only fuel the geek arguments.
These geeks have no life. They spend all day and all night compiling Linux kernels, watching sci-fi, reading LOTR cover to cover and fantasizing about Natalie Portman naked and Petrified. This whole SCO thing made the world look at the geeks in a different light. Now they are seen as "defenders" of some faith or whatever. These geeks really need to find some women and get laid. That will solve all these problems once and for all.
I know I will get modded -2 for this. Slashdot is all about Linux herdthink. I know they hate reality and truth. Because the truth is, the Geeks live in their dream world where Linux reigns supreme. Well guess what dudes!
I had a choice: Linux or Life. I chose Life.
Moderate this comment
Negative: Offtopic Flamebait Troll Redundant
Positive: Insightful Interesting Informative Funny -
Publicity Stunt By Linux GeeksHonestly, this is all bullshit. We know that this was publicity stunt by the Linux Geeks to get more airtime on the news. I bet they are secretly funding SCO. How do you explain SCO not going bust when it should've done so many years ago.
Sad to see Microsoft falling for this trick and giving money to SCO. This will only fuel the geek arguments.
These geeks have no life. They spend all day and all night compiling Linux kernels, watching sci-fi, reading LOTR cover to cover and fantasizing about Natalie Portman naked and Petrified. This whole SCO thing made the world look at the geeks in a different light. Now they are seen as "defenders" of some faith or whatever. These geeks really need to find some women and get laid. That will solve all these problems once and for all.
I know I will get modded -2 for this. Slashdot is all about Linux herdthink. I know they hate reality and truth. Because the truth is, the Geeks live in their dream world where Linux reigns supreme. Well guess what dudes!
I had a choice: Linux or Life. I chose Life.
Moderate this comment
Negative: Offtopic Flamebait Troll Redundant
Positive: Insightful Interesting Informative Funny -
Publicity Stunt By Linux GeeksHonestly, this is all bullshit. We know that this was publicity stunt by the Linux Geeks to get more airtime on the news. I bet they are secretly funding SCO. How do you explain SCO not going bust when it should've done so many years ago.
Sad to see Microsoft falling for this trick and giving money to SCO. This will only fuel the geek arguments.
These geeks have no life. They spend all day and all night compiling Linux kernels, watching sci-fi, reading LOTR cover to cover and fantasizing about Natalie Portman naked and Petrified. This whole SCO thing made the world look at the geeks in a different light. Now they are seen as "defenders" of some faith or whatever. These geeks really need to find some women and get laid. That will solve all these problems once and for all.
I know I will get modded -2 for this. Slashdot is all about Linux herdthink. I know they hate reality and truth. Because the truth is, the Geeks live in their dream world where Linux reigns supreme. Well guess what dudes!
I had a choice: Linux or Life. I chose Life.
Moderate this comment
Negative: Offtopic Flamebait Troll Redundant
Positive: Insightful Interesting Informative Funny -
Publicity Stunt By Linux GeeksHonestly, this is all bullshit. We know that this was publicity stunt by the Linux Geeks to get more airtime on the news. I bet they are secretly funding SCO. How do you explain SCO not going bust when it should've done so many years ago.
Sad to see Microsoft falling for this trick and giving money to SCO. This will only fuel the geek arguments.
These geeks have no life. They spend all day and all night compiling Linux kernels, watching sci-fi, reading LOTR cover to cover and fantasizing about Natalie Portman naked and Petrified. This whole SCO thing made the world look at the geeks in a different light. Now they are seen as "defenders" of some faith or whatever. These geeks really need to find some women and get laid. That will solve all these problems once and for all.
I know I will get modded -2 for this. Slashdot is all about Linux herdthink. I know they hate reality and truth. Because the truth is, the Geeks live in their dream world where Linux reigns supreme. Well guess what dudes!
I had a choice: Linux or Life. I chose Life.
Moderate this comment
Negative: Offtopic Flamebait Troll Redundant
Positive: Insightful Interesting Informative Funny -
Publicity Stunt By Linux GeeksHonestly, this is all bullshit. We know that this was publicity stunt by the Linux Geeks to get more airtime on the news. I bet they are secretly funding SCO. How do you explain SCO not going bust when it should've done so many years ago.
Sad to see Microsoft falling for this trick and giving money to SCO. This will only fuel the geek arguments.
These geeks have no life. They spend all day and all night compiling Linux kernels, watching sci-fi, reading LOTR cover to cover and fantasizing about Natalie Portman naked and Petrified. This whole SCO thing made the world look at the geeks in a different light. Now they are seen as "defenders" of some faith or whatever. These geeks really need to find some women and get laid. That will solve all these problems once and for all.
I know I will get modded -2 for this. Slashdot is all about Linux herdthink. I know they hate reality and truth. Because the truth is, the Geeks live in their dream world where Linux reigns supreme. Well guess what dudes!
I had a choice: Linux or Life. I chose Life.
Moderate this comment
Negative: Offtopic Flamebait Troll Redundant
Positive: Insightful Interesting Informative Funny -
Publicity Stunt By Linux GeeksHonestly, this is all bullshit. We know that this was publicity stunt by the Linux Geeks to get more airtime on the news. I bet they are secretly funding SCO. How do you explain SCO not going bust when it should've done so many years ago.
Sad to see Microsoft falling for this trick and giving money to SCO. This will only fuel the geek arguments.
These geeks have no life. They spend all day and all night compiling Linux kernels, watching sci-fi, reading LOTR cover to cover and fantasizing about Natalie Portman naked and Petrified. This whole SCO thing made the world look at the geeks in a different light. Now they are seen as "defenders" of some faith or whatever. These geeks really need to find some women and get laid. That will solve all these problems once and for all.
I know I will get modded -2 for this. Slashdot is all about Linux herdthink. I know they hate reality and truth. Because the truth is, the Geeks live in their dream world where Linux reigns supreme. Well guess what dudes!
I had a choice: Linux or Life. I chose Life.
Moderate this comment
Negative: Offtopic Flamebait Troll Redundant
Positive: Insightful Interesting Informative Funny -
It's quite obvious why they are doing thisWell apart from the much publicized link with Microsoft SCO is a dying company who have very little to lose. Their profits are heading south and they are about to go down under (Pun Intended). They have obtained pariah status sooner than you can say "litigious bastards". They know they have very little room to stand on legal-wise in the US, so it is pretty damn obvious they will try some other market, where things might just turn out more to their favour.
Justly or unjustly, rightly or wrongly, they have already paid a heavy price for their underhand techniques, in the form of the mydoom worm. This clearly shows how much anger and resentment the society has against this vulture of an organisation.
Under these circumstances, it is highly unlikely that their legal action will work anywhere in the world. Even if MS pumps more money into SCO to damage Linux, it will not save SCO.
SCO can't kill Linux. What doesn't kill you, only makes you stronger.
Moderate this comment
Negative: Offtopic Flamebait Troll Redundant
Positive: Insightful Interesting Informative Funny -
It's quite obvious why they are doing thisWell apart from the much publicized link with Microsoft SCO is a dying company who have very little to lose. Their profits are heading south and they are about to go down under (Pun Intended). They have obtained pariah status sooner than you can say "litigious bastards". They know they have very little room to stand on legal-wise in the US, so it is pretty damn obvious they will try some other market, where things might just turn out more to their favour.
Justly or unjustly, rightly or wrongly, they have already paid a heavy price for their underhand techniques, in the form of the mydoom worm. This clearly shows how much anger and resentment the society has against this vulture of an organisation.
Under these circumstances, it is highly unlikely that their legal action will work anywhere in the world. Even if MS pumps more money into SCO to damage Linux, it will not save SCO.
SCO can't kill Linux. What doesn't kill you, only makes you stronger.
Moderate this comment
Negative: Offtopic Flamebait Troll Redundant
Positive: Insightful Interesting Informative Funny -
It's quite obvious why they are doing thisWell apart from the much publicized link with Microsoft SCO is a dying company who have very little to lose. Their profits are heading south and they are about to go down under (Pun Intended). They have obtained pariah status sooner than you can say "litigious bastards". They know they have very little room to stand on legal-wise in the US, so it is pretty damn obvious they will try some other market, where things might just turn out more to their favour.
Justly or unjustly, rightly or wrongly, they have already paid a heavy price for their underhand techniques, in the form of the mydoom worm. This clearly shows how much anger and resentment the society has against this vulture of an organisation.
Under these circumstances, it is highly unlikely that their legal action will work anywhere in the world. Even if MS pumps more money into SCO to damage Linux, it will not save SCO.
SCO can't kill Linux. What doesn't kill you, only makes you stronger.
Moderate this comment
Negative: Offtopic Flamebait Troll Redundant
Positive: Insightful Interesting Informative Funny -
It's quite obvious why they are doing thisWell apart from the much publicized link with Microsoft SCO is a dying company who have very little to lose. Their profits are heading south and they are about to go down under (Pun Intended). They have obtained pariah status sooner than you can say "litigious bastards". They know they have very little room to stand on legal-wise in the US, so it is pretty damn obvious they will try some other market, where things might just turn out more to their favour.
Justly or unjustly, rightly or wrongly, they have already paid a heavy price for their underhand techniques, in the form of the mydoom worm. This clearly shows how much anger and resentment the society has against this vulture of an organisation.
Under these circumstances, it is highly unlikely that their legal action will work anywhere in the world. Even if MS pumps more money into SCO to damage Linux, it will not save SCO.
SCO can't kill Linux. What doesn't kill you, only makes you stronger.
Moderate this comment
Negative: Offtopic Flamebait Troll Redundant
Positive: Insightful Interesting Informative Funny -
It's quite obvious why they are doing thisWell apart from the much publicized link with Microsoft SCO is a dying company who have very little to lose. Their profits are heading south and they are about to go down under (Pun Intended). They have obtained pariah status sooner than you can say "litigious bastards". They know they have very little room to stand on legal-wise in the US, so it is pretty damn obvious they will try some other market, where things might just turn out more to their favour.
Justly or unjustly, rightly or wrongly, they have already paid a heavy price for their underhand techniques, in the form of the mydoom worm. This clearly shows how much anger and resentment the society has against this vulture of an organisation.
Under these circumstances, it is highly unlikely that their legal action will work anywhere in the world. Even if MS pumps more money into SCO to damage Linux, it will not save SCO.
SCO can't kill Linux. What doesn't kill you, only makes you stronger.
Moderate this comment
Negative: Offtopic Flamebait Troll Redundant
Positive: Insightful Interesting Informative Funny -
It's quite obvious why they are doing thisWell apart from the much publicized link with Microsoft SCO is a dying company who have very little to lose. Their profits are heading south and they are about to go down under (Pun Intended). They have obtained pariah status sooner than you can say "litigious bastards". They know they have very little room to stand on legal-wise in the US, so it is pretty damn obvious they will try some other market, where things might just turn out more to their favour.
Justly or unjustly, rightly or wrongly, they have already paid a heavy price for their underhand techniques, in the form of the mydoom worm. This clearly shows how much anger and resentment the society has against this vulture of an organisation.
Under these circumstances, it is highly unlikely that their legal action will work anywhere in the world. Even if MS pumps more money into SCO to damage Linux, it will not save SCO.
SCO can't kill Linux. What doesn't kill you, only makes you stronger.
Moderate this comment
Negative: Offtopic Flamebait Troll Redundant
Positive: Insightful Interesting Informative Funny -
It's quite obvious why they are doing thisWell apart from the much publicized link with Microsoft SCO is a dying company who have very little to lose. Their profits are heading south and they are about to go down under (Pun Intended). They have obtained pariah status sooner than you can say "litigious bastards". They know they have very little room to stand on legal-wise in the US, so it is pretty damn obvious they will try some other market, where things might just turn out more to their favour.
Justly or unjustly, rightly or wrongly, they have already paid a heavy price for their underhand techniques, in the form of the mydoom worm. This clearly shows how much anger and resentment the society has against this vulture of an organisation.
Under these circumstances, it is highly unlikely that their legal action will work anywhere in the world. Even if MS pumps more money into SCO to damage Linux, it will not save SCO.
SCO can't kill Linux. What doesn't kill you, only makes you stronger.
Moderate this comment
Negative: Offtopic Flamebait Troll Redundant
Positive: Insightful Interesting Informative Funny -
It's quite obvious why they are doing thisWell apart from the much publicized link with Microsoft SCO is a dying company who have very little to lose. Their profits are heading south and they are about to go down under (Pun Intended). They have obtained pariah status sooner than you can say "litigious bastards". They know they have very little room to stand on legal-wise in the US, so it is pretty damn obvious they will try some other market, where things might just turn out more to their favour.
Justly or unjustly, rightly or wrongly, they have already paid a heavy price for their underhand techniques, in the form of the mydoom worm. This clearly shows how much anger and resentment the society has against this vulture of an organisation.
Under these circumstances, it is highly unlikely that their legal action will work anywhere in the world. Even if MS pumps more money into SCO to damage Linux, it will not save SCO.
SCO can't kill Linux. What doesn't kill you, only makes you stronger.
Moderate this comment
Negative: Offtopic Flamebait Troll Redundant
Positive: Insightful Interesting Informative Funny -
Alternative RootsA very interesting article on alternative roots.
Extracts:
A new top-level domain doesn't really exist on the Internet until it is added to the root servers, so that any system anywhere on the net that is seeking that domain can find out from the root where the specific DNS servers for that domain lie.....
the operators of the root servers have a great deal of political power over the domain name system. Presently, these servers are operated by Verisign, but their policies are determined by ICANN, the organization set up to administer Internet naming and numbering schemes. Since ICANN has attracted a great deal of criticism (much of it highly deserved) for its biases towards large impersonal bureaucracies and against individual Internet users, various people have come up with the idea of "fighting back" against ICANN by setting up alternate roots.....
Setting up an alternate root turns out to be a very simple matter. The Internet has always been sort of a "do-it-yourself" thing, not centrally controlled or administered like a proprietary online service.....
a naming or addressing system only makes sense if everybody uses it consistently. If every telephone company had a different idea of how the country and area codes ought to be allocated, so that if your long distance service was with AT&T, "1-212" would reach New York City, but with Sprint the same prefix would reach Los Angeles, then telephone numbers would be in a state of chaos....
Moderate this comment
Negative: Offtopic Flamebait Troll Redundant
Positive: Insightful Interesting Informative Funny -
Alternative RootsA very interesting article on alternative roots.
Extracts:
A new top-level domain doesn't really exist on the Internet until it is added to the root servers, so that any system anywhere on the net that is seeking that domain can find out from the root where the specific DNS servers for that domain lie.....
the operators of the root servers have a great deal of political power over the domain name system. Presently, these servers are operated by Verisign, but their policies are determined by ICANN, the organization set up to administer Internet naming and numbering schemes. Since ICANN has attracted a great deal of criticism (much of it highly deserved) for its biases towards large impersonal bureaucracies and against individual Internet users, various people have come up with the idea of "fighting back" against ICANN by setting up alternate roots.....
Setting up an alternate root turns out to be a very simple matter. The Internet has always been sort of a "do-it-yourself" thing, not centrally controlled or administered like a proprietary online service.....
a naming or addressing system only makes sense if everybody uses it consistently. If every telephone company had a different idea of how the country and area codes ought to be allocated, so that if your long distance service was with AT&T, "1-212" would reach New York City, but with Sprint the same prefix would reach Los Angeles, then telephone numbers would be in a state of chaos....
Moderate this comment
Negative: Offtopic Flamebait Troll Redundant
Positive: Insightful Interesting Informative Funny -
Alternative RootsA very interesting article on alternative roots.
Extracts:
A new top-level domain doesn't really exist on the Internet until it is added to the root servers, so that any system anywhere on the net that is seeking that domain can find out from the root where the specific DNS servers for that domain lie.....
the operators of the root servers have a great deal of political power over the domain name system. Presently, these servers are operated by Verisign, but their policies are determined by ICANN, the organization set up to administer Internet naming and numbering schemes. Since ICANN has attracted a great deal of criticism (much of it highly deserved) for its biases towards large impersonal bureaucracies and against individual Internet users, various people have come up with the idea of "fighting back" against ICANN by setting up alternate roots.....
Setting up an alternate root turns out to be a very simple matter. The Internet has always been sort of a "do-it-yourself" thing, not centrally controlled or administered like a proprietary online service.....
a naming or addressing system only makes sense if everybody uses it consistently. If every telephone company had a different idea of how the country and area codes ought to be allocated, so that if your long distance service was with AT&T, "1-212" would reach New York City, but with Sprint the same prefix would reach Los Angeles, then telephone numbers would be in a state of chaos....
Moderate this comment
Negative: Offtopic Flamebait Troll Redundant
Positive: Insightful Interesting Informative Funny -
Alternative RootsA very interesting article on alternative roots.
Extracts:
A new top-level domain doesn't really exist on the Internet until it is added to the root servers, so that any system anywhere on the net that is seeking that domain can find out from the root where the specific DNS servers for that domain lie.....
the operators of the root servers have a great deal of political power over the domain name system. Presently, these servers are operated by Verisign, but their policies are determined by ICANN, the organization set up to administer Internet naming and numbering schemes. Since ICANN has attracted a great deal of criticism (much of it highly deserved) for its biases towards large impersonal bureaucracies and against individual Internet users, various people have come up with the idea of "fighting back" against ICANN by setting up alternate roots.....
Setting up an alternate root turns out to be a very simple matter. The Internet has always been sort of a "do-it-yourself" thing, not centrally controlled or administered like a proprietary online service.....
a naming or addressing system only makes sense if everybody uses it consistently. If every telephone company had a different idea of how the country and area codes ought to be allocated, so that if your long distance service was with AT&T, "1-212" would reach New York City, but with Sprint the same prefix would reach Los Angeles, then telephone numbers would be in a state of chaos....
Moderate this comment
Negative: Offtopic Flamebait Troll Redundant
Positive: Insightful Interesting Informative Funny -
Alternative RootsA very interesting article on alternative roots.
Extracts:
A new top-level domain doesn't really exist on the Internet until it is added to the root servers, so that any system anywhere on the net that is seeking that domain can find out from the root where the specific DNS servers for that domain lie.....
the operators of the root servers have a great deal of political power over the domain name system. Presently, these servers are operated by Verisign, but their policies are determined by ICANN, the organization set up to administer Internet naming and numbering schemes. Since ICANN has attracted a great deal of criticism (much of it highly deserved) for its biases towards large impersonal bureaucracies and against individual Internet users, various people have come up with the idea of "fighting back" against ICANN by setting up alternate roots.....
Setting up an alternate root turns out to be a very simple matter. The Internet has always been sort of a "do-it-yourself" thing, not centrally controlled or administered like a proprietary online service.....
a naming or addressing system only makes sense if everybody uses it consistently. If every telephone company had a different idea of how the country and area codes ought to be allocated, so that if your long distance service was with AT&T, "1-212" would reach New York City, but with Sprint the same prefix would reach Los Angeles, then telephone numbers would be in a state of chaos....
Moderate this comment
Negative: Offtopic Flamebait Troll Redundant
Positive: Insightful Interesting Informative Funny -
Alternative RootsA very interesting article on alternative roots.
Extracts:
A new top-level domain doesn't really exist on the Internet until it is added to the root servers, so that any system anywhere on the net that is seeking that domain can find out from the root where the specific DNS servers for that domain lie.....
the operators of the root servers have a great deal of political power over the domain name system. Presently, these servers are operated by Verisign, but their policies are determined by ICANN, the organization set up to administer Internet naming and numbering schemes. Since ICANN has attracted a great deal of criticism (much of it highly deserved) for its biases towards large impersonal bureaucracies and against individual Internet users, various people have come up with the idea of "fighting back" against ICANN by setting up alternate roots.....
Setting up an alternate root turns out to be a very simple matter. The Internet has always been sort of a "do-it-yourself" thing, not centrally controlled or administered like a proprietary online service.....
a naming or addressing system only makes sense if everybody uses it consistently. If every telephone company had a different idea of how the country and area codes ought to be allocated, so that if your long distance service was with AT&T, "1-212" would reach New York City, but with Sprint the same prefix would reach Los Angeles, then telephone numbers would be in a state of chaos....
Moderate this comment
Negative: Offtopic Flamebait Troll Redundant
Positive: Insightful Interesting Informative Funny -
Alternative RootsA very interesting article on alternative roots.
Extracts:
A new top-level domain doesn't really exist on the Internet until it is added to the root servers, so that any system anywhere on the net that is seeking that domain can find out from the root where the specific DNS servers for that domain lie.....
the operators of the root servers have a great deal of political power over the domain name system. Presently, these servers are operated by Verisign, but their policies are determined by ICANN, the organization set up to administer Internet naming and numbering schemes. Since ICANN has attracted a great deal of criticism (much of it highly deserved) for its biases towards large impersonal bureaucracies and against individual Internet users, various people have come up with the idea of "fighting back" against ICANN by setting up alternate roots.....
Setting up an alternate root turns out to be a very simple matter. The Internet has always been sort of a "do-it-yourself" thing, not centrally controlled or administered like a proprietary online service.....
a naming or addressing system only makes sense if everybody uses it consistently. If every telephone company had a different idea of how the country and area codes ought to be allocated, so that if your long distance service was with AT&T, "1-212" would reach New York City, but with Sprint the same prefix would reach Los Angeles, then telephone numbers would be in a state of chaos....
Moderate this comment
Negative: Offtopic Flamebait Troll Redundant
Positive: Insightful Interesting Informative Funny -
Alternative RootsA very interesting article on alternative roots.
Extracts:
A new top-level domain doesn't really exist on the Internet until it is added to the root servers, so that any system anywhere on the net that is seeking that domain can find out from the root where the specific DNS servers for that domain lie.....
the operators of the root servers have a great deal of political power over the domain name system. Presently, these servers are operated by Verisign, but their policies are determined by ICANN, the organization set up to administer Internet naming and numbering schemes. Since ICANN has attracted a great deal of criticism (much of it highly deserved) for its biases towards large impersonal bureaucracies and against individual Internet users, various people have come up with the idea of "fighting back" against ICANN by setting up alternate roots.....
Setting up an alternate root turns out to be a very simple matter. The Internet has always been sort of a "do-it-yourself" thing, not centrally controlled or administered like a proprietary online service.....
a naming or addressing system only makes sense if everybody uses it consistently. If every telephone company had a different idea of how the country and area codes ought to be allocated, so that if your long distance service was with AT&T, "1-212" would reach New York City, but with Sprint the same prefix would reach Los Angeles, then telephone numbers would be in a state of chaos....
Moderate this comment
Negative: Offtopic Flamebait Troll Redundant
Positive: Insightful Interesting Informative Funny -
GIMP for Win32 InstallYou can get the GIMP for Win32 Installer here
Unfortunately, they don't have GIMP 2.0 yet
:(
Moderate this comment
Negative: Offtopic Flamebait Troll Redundant
Positive: Insightful Interesting Informative Funny -
GIMP for Win32 InstallYou can get the GIMP for Win32 Installer here
Unfortunately, they don't have GIMP 2.0 yet
:(
Moderate this comment
Negative: Offtopic Flamebait Troll Redundant
Positive: Insightful Interesting Informative Funny -
GIMP for Win32 InstallYou can get the GIMP for Win32 Installer here
Unfortunately, they don't have GIMP 2.0 yet
:(
Moderate this comment
Negative: Offtopic Flamebait Troll Redundant
Positive: Insightful Interesting Informative Funny -
GIMP for Win32 InstallYou can get the GIMP for Win32 Installer here
Unfortunately, they don't have GIMP 2.0 yet
:(
Moderate this comment
Negative: Offtopic Flamebait Troll Redundant
Positive: Insightful Interesting Informative Funny -
GIMP for Win32 InstallYou can get the GIMP for Win32 Installer here
Unfortunately, they don't have GIMP 2.0 yet
:(
Moderate this comment
Negative: Offtopic Flamebait Troll Redundant
Positive: Insightful Interesting Informative Funny -
GIMP for Win32 InstallYou can get the GIMP for Win32 Installer here
Unfortunately, they don't have GIMP 2.0 yet
:(
Moderate this comment
Negative: Offtopic Flamebait Troll Redundant
Positive: Insightful Interesting Informative Funny -
GIMP for Win32 InstallYou can get the GIMP for Win32 Installer here
Unfortunately, they don't have GIMP 2.0 yet
:(
Moderate this comment
Negative: Offtopic Flamebait Troll Redundant
Positive: Insightful Interesting Informative Funny -
GIMP for Win32 InstallYou can get the GIMP for Win32 Installer here
Unfortunately, they don't have GIMP 2.0 yet
:(
Moderate this comment
Negative: Offtopic Flamebait Troll Redundant
Positive: Insightful Interesting Informative Funny