Slashdot Mirror

I think transmeta is loved by geek [mithuro.com] community just because of Linus Torvalds connection.

Their first chip Crusoe, although saving power, underperformed [pcworld.com] badly. And the Efficeon doesn't look fast compared to its rivals. The Efficeon TM 8000 can do 1.1GHz consuming 7W. Intel's Pentium M does 1.7GHz for the same power consumption.

I don't think there's anything particularly cool about this news. It is the same as the discovery of the new planet [mithuro.com]. There are better ones already out there. bx

I think transmeta is loved by geek [mithuro.com] community just because of Linus Torvalds connection.

Their first chip Crusoe, although saving power, underperformed [pcworld.com] badly. And the Efficeon doesn't look fast compared to its rivals. The Efficeon TM 8000 can do 1.1GHz consuming 7W. Intel's Pentium M does 1.7GHz for the same power consumption.

I don't think there's anything particularly cool about this news. It is the same as the discovery of the new planet [mithuro.com]. There are better ones already out there. bx

I think transmeta is loved by geek [mithuro.com] community just because of Linus Torvalds connection.

Their first chip Crusoe, although saving power, underperformed [pcworld.com] badly. And the Efficeon doesn't look fast compared to its rivals. The Efficeon TM 8000 can do 1.1GHz consuming 7W. Intel's Pentium M does 1.7GHz for the same power consumption.

I don't think there's anything particularly cool about this news. It is the same as the discovery of the new planet [mithuro.com]. There are better ones already out there. zd

I think transmeta is loved by geek [mithuro.com] community just because of Linus Torvalds connection.

Their first chip Crusoe, although saving power, underperformed [pcworld.com] badly. And the Efficeon doesn't look fast compared to its rivals. The Efficeon TM 8000 can do 1.1GHz consuming 7W. Intel's Pentium M does 1.7GHz for the same power consumption.

I don't think there's anything particularly cool about this news. It is the same as the discovery of the new planet [mithuro.com]. There are better ones already out there. zd

The notation used for traditional music in my country, Sri Lanka, is one of the most primitive notations I have ever seen. My friend Jim [mithuro.com] claims that the notation system used in Europe is far too restrictive. The same way a person's thought processes are controlled by the language, music is also partially constricted by the notation system used.

Jim claims that the traditional music in Sri Lanka has far greater diversity than its western counterpart. Thus a simple music notation system, in his opinion at least, is far better than a complex rigorous one. lt

From the Infineon Site

Moderate this comment
Negative: Offtopic Flamebait Troll Redundant
Positive: Insightful Interesting Informative Funny

From the Infineon Site

Moderate this comment
Negative: Offtopic Flamebait Troll Redundant
Positive: Insightful Interesting Informative Funny

From the Infineon Site

Moderate this comment
Negative: Offtopic Flamebait Troll Redundant
Positive: Insightful Interesting Informative Funny

From the Infineon Site

Moderate this comment
Negative: Offtopic Flamebait Troll Redundant
Positive: Insightful Interesting Informative Funny

From the Infineon Site

Moderate this comment
Negative: Offtopic Flamebait Troll Redundant
Positive: Insightful Interesting Informative Funny

From the Infineon Site

Moderate this comment
Negative: Offtopic Flamebait Troll Redundant
Positive: Insightful Interesting Informative Funny

From the Infineon Site

Moderate this comment
Negative: Offtopic Flamebait Troll Redundant
Positive: Insightful Interesting Informative Funny

From the Infineon Site

Moderate this comment
Negative: Offtopic Flamebait Troll Redundant
Positive: Insightful Interesting Informative Funny

Simple logic

1. The terrorists hate us because we have freedom
2. Let's get rid of our freedoms
3. The terrorists will leave us alone.
   

   Moderate this comment
   Negative: Offtopic Flamebait Troll Redundant
   Positive: Insightful Interesting Informative Funny

Simple logic

1. The terrorists hate us because we have freedom
2. Let's get rid of our freedoms
3. The terrorists will leave us alone.
   

   Moderate this comment
   Negative: Offtopic Flamebait Troll Redundant
   Positive: Insightful Interesting Informative Funny

Simple logic

1. The terrorists hate us because we have freedom
2. Let's get rid of our freedoms
3. The terrorists will leave us alone.
   

   Moderate this comment
   Negative: Offtopic Flamebait Troll Redundant
   Positive: Insightful Interesting Informative Funny

Simple logic

1. The terrorists hate us because we have freedom
2. Let's get rid of our freedoms
3. The terrorists will leave us alone.
   

   Moderate this comment
   Negative: Offtopic Flamebait Troll Redundant
   Positive: Insightful Interesting Informative Funny

Simple logic

1. The terrorists hate us because we have freedom
2. Let's get rid of our freedoms
3. The terrorists will leave us alone.
   

   Moderate this comment
   Negative: Offtopic Flamebait Troll Redundant
   Positive: Insightful Interesting Informative Funny

Simple logic

1. The terrorists hate us because we have freedom
2. Let's get rid of our freedoms
3. The terrorists will leave us alone.
   

   Moderate this comment
   Negative: Offtopic Flamebait Troll Redundant
   Positive: Insightful Interesting Informative Funny

Simple logic

1. The terrorists hate us because we have freedom
2. Let's get rid of our freedoms
3. The terrorists will leave us alone.
   

   Moderate this comment
   Negative: Offtopic Flamebait Troll Redundant
   Positive: Insightful Interesting Informative Funny

Simple logic

1. The terrorists hate us because we have freedom
2. Let's get rid of our freedoms
3. The terrorists will leave us alone.
   

   Moderate this comment
   Negative: Offtopic Flamebait Troll Redundant
   Positive: Insightful Interesting Informative Funny

PC Pro exposes inkjets 5:30PM

Extensive testing by PC Pro's labs has revealed that photographs produced by inkjet printers can be both far more expensive than those from traditional photo processors and fade far more quickly. But not if you choose the right combination of printer, ink and paper. For a period of twelve months PC Pro's staff tracked how 150 colour photographs produced by inkjet printers from leading manufacturers survived being exposed to normal air and daylight.

'The results were astonishing, ranging from no fading at all, to one photo where every colour except cyan had vanished, and even that was cracking and flaking off the page,' said Nick

Ross, PC Pro's deputy labs editor and author of the report.

'We also compared the cost of printing photographs yourself to having them printed from digital files by a photo lab. There's little point in being able to print pretty pictures on a cheap printer if they're going to cost four times more than on the high street,' added Ross. 'But the savings aren't uniform and for some sizes of print getting them done on the Internet saves a significant amount of money.'

To accompany the investigation PC Pro tested 14 of the latest inkjet printers and identified the one which produced the best combination of print quality, fade resistance, speed, ease of use and value for money.

The full results of the fade tests and cost per print comparisons along with full reviews of the inkjet printers can be found in the new issue of PC Pro, which goes on sale this week.

Moderate this comment
Negative: Offtopic Flamebait Troll Redundant
Positive: Insightful Interesting Informative Funny

PC Pro exposes inkjets 5:30PM

Extensive testing by PC Pro's labs has revealed that photographs produced by inkjet printers can be both far more expensive than those from traditional photo processors and fade far more quickly. But not if you choose the right combination of printer, ink and paper. For a period of twelve months PC Pro's staff tracked how 150 colour photographs produced by inkjet printers from leading manufacturers survived being exposed to normal air and daylight.

'The results were astonishing, ranging from no fading at all, to one photo where every colour except cyan had vanished, and even that was cracking and flaking off the page,' said Nick

Ross, PC Pro's deputy labs editor and author of the report.

'We also compared the cost of printing photographs yourself to having them printed from digital files by a photo lab. There's little point in being able to print pretty pictures on a cheap printer if they're going to cost four times more than on the high street,' added Ross. 'But the savings aren't uniform and for some sizes of print getting them done on the Internet saves a significant amount of money.'

To accompany the investigation PC Pro tested 14 of the latest inkjet printers and identified the one which produced the best combination of print quality, fade resistance, speed, ease of use and value for money.

The full results of the fade tests and cost per print comparisons along with full reviews of the inkjet printers can be found in the new issue of PC Pro, which goes on sale this week.

Moderate this comment
Negative: Offtopic Flamebait Troll Redundant
Positive: Insightful Interesting Informative Funny

PC Pro exposes inkjets 5:30PM

Extensive testing by PC Pro's labs has revealed that photographs produced by inkjet printers can be both far more expensive than those from traditional photo processors and fade far more quickly. But not if you choose the right combination of printer, ink and paper. For a period of twelve months PC Pro's staff tracked how 150 colour photographs produced by inkjet printers from leading manufacturers survived being exposed to normal air and daylight.

'The results were astonishing, ranging from no fading at all, to one photo where every colour except cyan had vanished, and even that was cracking and flaking off the page,' said Nick

Ross, PC Pro's deputy labs editor and author of the report.

'We also compared the cost of printing photographs yourself to having them printed from digital files by a photo lab. There's little point in being able to print pretty pictures on a cheap printer if they're going to cost four times more than on the high street,' added Ross. 'But the savings aren't uniform and for some sizes of print getting them done on the Internet saves a significant amount of money.'

To accompany the investigation PC Pro tested 14 of the latest inkjet printers and identified the one which produced the best combination of print quality, fade resistance, speed, ease of use and value for money.

The full results of the fade tests and cost per print comparisons along with full reviews of the inkjet printers can be found in the new issue of PC Pro, which goes on sale this week.

Moderate this comment
Negative: Offtopic Flamebait Troll Redundant
Positive: Insightful Interesting Informative Funny

PC Pro exposes inkjets 5:30PM

Extensive testing by PC Pro's labs has revealed that photographs produced by inkjet printers can be both far more expensive than those from traditional photo processors and fade far more quickly. But not if you choose the right combination of printer, ink and paper. For a period of twelve months PC Pro's staff tracked how 150 colour photographs produced by inkjet printers from leading manufacturers survived being exposed to normal air and daylight.

'The results were astonishing, ranging from no fading at all, to one photo where every colour except cyan had vanished, and even that was cracking and flaking off the page,' said Nick

Ross, PC Pro's deputy labs editor and author of the report.

'We also compared the cost of printing photographs yourself to having them printed from digital files by a photo lab. There's little point in being able to print pretty pictures on a cheap printer if they're going to cost four times more than on the high street,' added Ross. 'But the savings aren't uniform and for some sizes of print getting them done on the Internet saves a significant amount of money.'

To accompany the investigation PC Pro tested 14 of the latest inkjet printers and identified the one which produced the best combination of print quality, fade resistance, speed, ease of use and value for money.

The full results of the fade tests and cost per print comparisons along with full reviews of the inkjet printers can be found in the new issue of PC Pro, which goes on sale this week.

Moderate this comment
Negative: Offtopic Flamebait Troll Redundant
Positive: Insightful Interesting Informative Funny

PC Pro exposes inkjets 5:30PM

Extensive testing by PC Pro's labs has revealed that photographs produced by inkjet printers can be both far more expensive than those from traditional photo processors and fade far more quickly. But not if you choose the right combination of printer, ink and paper. For a period of twelve months PC Pro's staff tracked how 150 colour photographs produced by inkjet printers from leading manufacturers survived being exposed to normal air and daylight.

'The results were astonishing, ranging from no fading at all, to one photo where every colour except cyan had vanished, and even that was cracking and flaking off the page,' said Nick

Ross, PC Pro's deputy labs editor and author of the report.

'We also compared the cost of printing photographs yourself to having them printed from digital files by a photo lab. There's little point in being able to print pretty pictures on a cheap printer if they're going to cost four times more than on the high street,' added Ross. 'But the savings aren't uniform and for some sizes of print getting them done on the Internet saves a significant amount of money.'

To accompany the investigation PC Pro tested 14 of the latest inkjet printers and identified the one which produced the best combination of print quality, fade resistance, speed, ease of use and value for money.

The full results of the fade tests and cost per print comparisons along with full reviews of the inkjet printers can be found in the new issue of PC Pro, which goes on sale this week.

Moderate this comment
Negative: Offtopic Flamebait Troll Redundant
Positive: Insightful Interesting Informative Funny

PC Pro exposes inkjets 5:30PM

Extensive testing by PC Pro's labs has revealed that photographs produced by inkjet printers can be both far more expensive than those from traditional photo processors and fade far more quickly. But not if you choose the right combination of printer, ink and paper. For a period of twelve months PC Pro's staff tracked how 150 colour photographs produced by inkjet printers from leading manufacturers survived being exposed to normal air and daylight.

'The results were astonishing, ranging from no fading at all, to one photo where every colour except cyan had vanished, and even that was cracking and flaking off the page,' said Nick

Ross, PC Pro's deputy labs editor and author of the report.

'We also compared the cost of printing photographs yourself to having them printed from digital files by a photo lab. There's little point in being able to print pretty pictures on a cheap printer if they're going to cost four times more than on the high street,' added Ross. 'But the savings aren't uniform and for some sizes of print getting them done on the Internet saves a significant amount of money.'

To accompany the investigation PC Pro tested 14 of the latest inkjet printers and identified the one which produced the best combination of print quality, fade resistance, speed, ease of use and value for money.

The full results of the fade tests and cost per print comparisons along with full reviews of the inkjet printers can be found in the new issue of PC Pro, which goes on sale this week.

Moderate this comment
Negative: Offtopic Flamebait Troll Redundant
Positive: Insightful Interesting Informative Funny

PC Pro exposes inkjets 5:30PM

Extensive testing by PC Pro's labs has revealed that photographs produced by inkjet printers can be both far more expensive than those from traditional photo processors and fade far more quickly. But not if you choose the right combination of printer, ink and paper. For a period of twelve months PC Pro's staff tracked how 150 colour photographs produced by inkjet printers from leading manufacturers survived being exposed to normal air and daylight.

'The results were astonishing, ranging from no fading at all, to one photo where every colour except cyan had vanished, and even that was cracking and flaking off the page,' said Nick

Ross, PC Pro's deputy labs editor and author of the report.

'We also compared the cost of printing photographs yourself to having them printed from digital files by a photo lab. There's little point in being able to print pretty pictures on a cheap printer if they're going to cost four times more than on the high street,' added Ross. 'But the savings aren't uniform and for some sizes of print getting them done on the Internet saves a significant amount of money.'

To accompany the investigation PC Pro tested 14 of the latest inkjet printers and identified the one which produced the best combination of print quality, fade resistance, speed, ease of use and value for money.

The full results of the fade tests and cost per print comparisons along with full reviews of the inkjet printers can be found in the new issue of PC Pro, which goes on sale this week.

Moderate this comment
Negative: Offtopic Flamebait Troll Redundant
Positive: Insightful Interesting Informative Funny

PC Pro exposes inkjets 5:30PM

Extensive testing by PC Pro's labs has revealed that photographs produced by inkjet printers can be both far more expensive than those from traditional photo processors and fade far more quickly. But not if you choose the right combination of printer, ink and paper. For a period of twelve months PC Pro's staff tracked how 150 colour photographs produced by inkjet printers from leading manufacturers survived being exposed to normal air and daylight.

'The results were astonishing, ranging from no fading at all, to one photo where every colour except cyan had vanished, and even that was cracking and flaking off the page,' said Nick

Ross, PC Pro's deputy labs editor and author of the report.

'We also compared the cost of printing photographs yourself to having them printed from digital files by a photo lab. There's little point in being able to print pretty pictures on a cheap printer if they're going to cost four times more than on the high street,' added Ross. 'But the savings aren't uniform and for some sizes of print getting them done on the Internet saves a significant amount of money.'

To accompany the investigation PC Pro tested 14 of the latest inkjet printers and identified the one which produced the best combination of print quality, fade resistance, speed, ease of use and value for money.

The full results of the fade tests and cost per print comparisons along with full reviews of the inkjet printers can be found in the new issue of PC Pro, which goes on sale this week.

Moderate this comment
Negative: Offtopic Flamebait Troll Redundant
Positive: Insightful Interesting Informative Funny

is here

From TFA: Extensive testing by PC Pro's labs has revealed that photographs produced by inkjet printers can be both far more expensive than those from traditional photo processors and fade far more quickly.

Moderate this comment
Negative: Offtopic Flamebait Troll Redundant
Positive: Insightful Interesting Informative Funny

is here

From TFA: Extensive testing by PC Pro's labs has revealed that photographs produced by inkjet printers can be both far more expensive than those from traditional photo processors and fade far more quickly.

Moderate this comment
Negative: Offtopic Flamebait Troll Redundant
Positive: Insightful Interesting Informative Funny

is here

From TFA: Extensive testing by PC Pro's labs has revealed that photographs produced by inkjet printers can be both far more expensive than those from traditional photo processors and fade far more quickly.

Moderate this comment
Negative: Offtopic Flamebait Troll Redundant
Positive: Insightful Interesting Informative Funny

is here

From TFA: Extensive testing by PC Pro's labs has revealed that photographs produced by inkjet printers can be both far more expensive than those from traditional photo processors and fade far more quickly.

Moderate this comment
Negative: Offtopic Flamebait Troll Redundant
Positive: Insightful Interesting Informative Funny

is here

From TFA: Extensive testing by PC Pro's labs has revealed that photographs produced by inkjet printers can be both far more expensive than those from traditional photo processors and fade far more quickly.

Moderate this comment
Negative: Offtopic Flamebait Troll Redundant
Positive: Insightful Interesting Informative Funny

is here

From TFA: Extensive testing by PC Pro's labs has revealed that photographs produced by inkjet printers can be both far more expensive than those from traditional photo processors and fade far more quickly.

Moderate this comment
Negative: Offtopic Flamebait Troll Redundant
Positive: Insightful Interesting Informative Funny

is here

From TFA: Extensive testing by PC Pro's labs has revealed that photographs produced by inkjet printers can be both far more expensive than those from traditional photo processors and fade far more quickly.

Moderate this comment
Negative: Offtopic Flamebait Troll Redundant
Positive: Insightful Interesting Informative Funny

is here

From TFA: Extensive testing by PC Pro's labs has revealed that photographs produced by inkjet printers can be both far more expensive than those from traditional photo processors and fade far more quickly.

Moderate this comment
Negative: Offtopic Flamebait Troll Redundant
Positive: Insightful Interesting Informative Funny

Since 1998, the police have the right to demand your encryption keys. Here's an old article about that.

Moderate this comment
Negative: Offtopic Flamebait Troll Redundant
Positive: Insightful Interesting Informative Funny

Since 1998, the police have the right to demand your encryption keys. Here's an old article about that.

Moderate this comment
Negative: Offtopic Flamebait Troll Redundant
Positive: Insightful Interesting Informative Funny

Since 1998, the police have the right to demand your encryption keys. Here's an old article about that.

Moderate this comment
Negative: Offtopic Flamebait Troll Redundant
Positive: Insightful Interesting Informative Funny

Since 1998, the police have the right to demand your encryption keys. Here's an old article about that.

Moderate this comment
Negative: Offtopic Flamebait Troll Redundant
Positive: Insightful Interesting Informative Funny

Since 1998, the police have the right to demand your encryption keys. Here's an old article about that.

Moderate this comment
Negative: Offtopic Flamebait Troll Redundant
Positive: Insightful Interesting Informative Funny

Since 1998, the police have the right to demand your encryption keys. Here's an old article about that.

Moderate this comment
Negative: Offtopic Flamebait Troll Redundant
Positive: Insightful Interesting Informative Funny

Since 1998, the police have the right to demand your encryption keys. Here's an old article about that.

Moderate this comment
Negative: Offtopic Flamebait Troll Redundant
Positive: Insightful Interesting Informative Funny

Since 1998, the police have the right to demand your encryption keys. Here's an old article about that.

Moderate this comment
Negative: Offtopic Flamebait Troll Redundant
Positive: Insightful Interesting Informative Funny

Battle of the Ages -- Stereotypes Collide

• Seasoned IT staffers stereotype consultants as too young to know anything
• Consultants stereotype the IT staff as mired in ancient technology

Time for a Reality Check

• CIOs don't have the luxury of time.
• Internal staff resent lost opportunities to learn and advance.
• Some consultants are experienced in comparatively few technologies.
• Internal staffers know the existing systems and business processes.
• Some internal staffers are intransigent, happiest with older technology.
• Consultants heighten tension by deferring operational tasks to internal staff.
• IT staffers' animosity builds, fueling passive resistance.
• Knowledge transfer garners little attention until it is too late.

Moderate this comment
Negative: Offtopic Flamebait Troll Redundant
Positive: Insightful Interesting Informative Funny

Battle of the Ages -- Stereotypes Collide

• Seasoned IT staffers stereotype consultants as too young to know anything
• Consultants stereotype the IT staff as mired in ancient technology

Time for a Reality Check

• CIOs don't have the luxury of time.
• Internal staff resent lost opportunities to learn and advance.
• Some consultants are experienced in comparatively few technologies.
• Internal staffers know the existing systems and business processes.
• Some internal staffers are intransigent, happiest with older technology.
• Consultants heighten tension by deferring operational tasks to internal staff.
• IT staffers' animosity builds, fueling passive resistance.
• Knowledge transfer garners little attention until it is too late.

Moderate this comment
Negative: Offtopic Flamebait Troll Redundant
Positive: Insightful Interesting Informative Funny

Battle of the Ages -- Stereotypes Collide

• Seasoned IT staffers stereotype consultants as too young to know anything
• Consultants stereotype the IT staff as mired in ancient technology

Time for a Reality Check

• CIOs don't have the luxury of time.
• Internal staff resent lost opportunities to learn and advance.
• Some consultants are experienced in comparatively few technologies.
• Internal staffers know the existing systems and business processes.
• Some internal staffers are intransigent, happiest with older technology.
• Consultants heighten tension by deferring operational tasks to internal staff.
• IT staffers' animosity builds, fueling passive resistance.
• Knowledge transfer garners little attention until it is too late.

Moderate this comment
Negative: Offtopic Flamebait Troll Redundant
Positive: Insightful Interesting Informative Funny

Battle of the Ages -- Stereotypes Collide

• Seasoned IT staffers stereotype consultants as too young to know anything
• Consultants stereotype the IT staff as mired in ancient technology

Time for a Reality Check

• CIOs don't have the luxury of time.
• Internal staff resent lost opportunities to learn and advance.
• Some consultants are experienced in comparatively few technologies.
• Internal staffers know the existing systems and business processes.
• Some internal staffers are intransigent, happiest with older technology.
• Consultants heighten tension by deferring operational tasks to internal staff.
• IT staffers' animosity builds, fueling passive resistance.
• Knowledge transfer garners little attention until it is too late.

Moderate this comment
Negative: Offtopic Flamebait Troll Redundant
Positive: Insightful Interesting Informative Funny

Battle of the Ages -- Stereotypes Collide

• Seasoned IT staffers stereotype consultants as too young to know anything
• Consultants stereotype the IT staff as mired in ancient technology

Time for a Reality Check

• CIOs don't have the luxury of time.
• Internal staff resent lost opportunities to learn and advance.
• Some consultants are experienced in comparatively few technologies.
• Internal staffers know the existing systems and business processes.
• Some internal staffers are intransigent, happiest with older technology.
• Consultants heighten tension by deferring operational tasks to internal staff.
• IT staffers' animosity builds, fueling passive resistance.
• Knowledge transfer garners little attention until it is too late.

Moderate this comment
Negative: Offtopic Flamebait Troll Redundant
Positive: Insightful Interesting Informative Funny