Domain: neonapster.com
Stories and comments across the archive that link to neonapster.com.
Comments · 13
-
Re:Difference
Neonapster is not a rippoff of cdex.
Correct. NeoNapster ripped off CDex to create NeoAudio. NeoNapster is not only a Gnutella servant, its also the collective name of the people who make it. Thats why you can download NeoAudio from NeoNapster.com.
-
a slip perhaps?Have you looked at the titles in the screenshot?
Titles like:
"The pleasure and the greed",
"Mistake",
"Undersold",
"Knee deep (in what I ask...?)",
"No fault"
and best of all
"All our days are numbered"!
:-) -
Ready... ATTACK!
-
Re:A little murky here
Not that at the end of the NeoAudio license, they didn't even remove the commentary about how to claim copyright and how you should get your employer's signature. I suspect that they didn't even read the whole thing, and this this is a case of copyright infringement due to ignorance/stupidity, instead of malice. Still highly illegal, tho.
-
They don't look all that similar :-)
-
CDex Acknowledged
It's still not very nice, but at the bottom of "NeoAudio.rtf" in the source (available from their site) it says:
Acknowledgements
Based on CDex.
I guess this and the GPL licence means they might technically be doing nothing wrong.
-
Screen shots of each..
-
and we should care because?
The problem is not so much that their taking someone's GPL'd program and redistributing it under a new name, but that they are removing the original author's (Albert L Faber) copyright notices. The author's copyright of the program must be maintained in order for the GPL to be effective, otherwise people (like these) could completely jack the code and release it under any liscense they want.
But we should consider ourselves lucky that they're releasing it under the GPL and the source code is still available at the bottom of this page. -
Before anybody starts screaming "GPL violation"the source code for both NeoNapster and NeoAudio are posted on their download page, and both programs are licensed under the GPL. Even if this is ethically wrong, legally it's fine.
That said, it's still a nasty rip-off, and I hope people use CDex (a very fine piece of software, incidentally) instead.
-
Before anybody starts screaming "GPL violation"the source code for both NeoNapster and NeoAudio are posted on their download page, and both programs are licensed under the GPL. Even if this is ethically wrong, legally it's fine.
That said, it's still a nasty rip-off, and I hope people use CDex (a very fine piece of software, incidentally) instead.
-
Ummmm So what?
What's the big deal here? They aren't in violation of the GPL. They have the source available for download. Why is this news again?
-
Give them soem credit.
They at least made the source available.
-
Wait, there's more . . .
Not only does this company's website point to NeoAudio, which uses CDEx code, but NeoNapster, which is straight out of any of the Gnutella codebases, and is Yet Another Gnutella Client, but with spyware added.
I can't wait for their upcoming release: NeoLinux with the NeoGNOME desktop environment.