Slashdot Mirror

• The well know pen island at www.PenisLand.net
• The Royal Tit-Watching (Ornithological) Society Of Britain at www.Nice-Tits.org
• Dickson's temperature equipment at www.DicksOnWeb.com
• The well known scaffolding company, www.MammothErection.com
• Big Al's Fishing company, www.BiGalsOnline.com
• Web One at www.WeBone.com

All it means is that if I randomly type in nice-tits.xxx I can be sure that the site I get will have pictures of exposed breasts and not something like nice-tits.org a bird watching site.
Then again, they do have xxx pictures: http://www.nice-tits.org/tits/xxx_blue_03.jpg

For those that are still wondering what triple-X means, let's be specific... They are talking about pornography.
That's all there is to understand about it. All it means is that if I randomly type in nice-tits.xxx I can be sure that the site I get will have pictures of exposed breasts and not something like nice-tits.org a bird watching site.

Why post pics of boobies when you can post a link to some tits?

You can usually tell from a domain name if you should be loading the url or not

whitehouse.org
nice-tits.org

Both not really the sites you might expect

Let's work on some alternatives here..

I suggest fist to replace fuck. As in fist you, motherfister.. That immediately sounds a lot nicer.

Also, perhaps to replace piss, if it's used as a derogatory term (since there's already a perfectly good word for piss; urine), I'd suggest come, or cum as it's known online.

The phrase, this place smells like two-week old come would surely please the FCC immensly, as it contains not a single dirty word.

Now, for cunt one might describe the actual organ as vagina, or perhaps, on Oprah, as beafcurtain covered meathole, but I understand it's ofted used to refer to a person, as in "he's a cunt". Luckily, dickhead isn't on the list, otherwise what would one call Mr.Cheney's face for example?

"cocksucker" is a bit of a mystery to me. Neither word the composite is made up of is particularly naughty in its own right. While applicant of low pressure to a rooster might be an odd jobdescription, who knows if these people exist, and how much pride they might take in their work? Surely people working at the fudgepacking plant have similar feelings. Perhaps cumbucket would be an alternative with enough street-cred to supplant it some day.

As for tits, that just doesn't make sense. In particular, The Royal Tit-Watching (ornithological) Society (SFW) would take serious issue with not being able to discuss the objects of their fascination. Besides "look at the tits on her" is a term of admiration. I'd suggest we go with funbags on this one, since it would, hopefully, infuriate rabid feminists and/or puritans even more if breasts, which are actually pretty mundane things - almost all women and overweight men have them - are consistently referred to explicitely as sexual objects.

So there you have it, folks. Now leave me the fist alone, you're fudgepacking cumbuckets the lot of you!

I wonder if they'll ever have pictures for a search for tits?

'cause they don't have Nice Tits like the British, so they're jealous.

Almost, but not quite.

Although it's always fun to point out to megapixel-fetishists that 1024x768 looks find on a 15" panel mere inches from your face (wossat, 50% of your visual field) unless you're staring intently to make out every detail of some nice tits.

You know of course that a pram is a tit in dutch?

I like looking at tits.

Actually, it really stands for "nice tits", but that's something they couldn't tell the marketing department.

Why not?