Domain: rednoize.com
Stories and comments across the archive that link to rednoize.com.
Comments · 8
-
Re:Details
The password for user ianapp is spare251
via http://md5.rednoize.com/
Think I'll post anonymously. -
Re:quick slashdot reader test:
It passes the google test. By example, 5f4dcc3b5aa765d61d8327deb882cf99 does not. Nor does 5ebe2294ecd0e0f08eab7690d2a6ee69.
This table doesn't know it:
http://gdataonline.com/seekhash.php
Neither does this one:
And nor do several others. So it seems it is reasonably long or otherwise strong.
-
Re:MD5 Lookup Site & Names
Hey, stoopid idea:
you can use MD5 hashes to sign your posts with cryptic messages!
Put this through rednoize:a602dc4d6b16b615be62b9839a6d419b -
Re:My uneducated respose would be:
I wonder how many people just went to http://md5.rednoize.com/ and tried it out to see if it had already been logged. They type their own password in, and up pops the md5. Well, now they have it logged!
Actually, hitting refresh on that site, you can see how fast their database is growing. After playing with it for a few minutes, it seems to be growing by 1 or 2 per second. -
Re:Credibility?
Perhaps it's due to Slashdot, but all of the hashes you generated are present on http://md5.rednoize.com/, so the previous claim that hashes of common words don't exist in the internet might not be quite true.
-
Re:MD5 Lookup Site & Names
And sure enough, if you read the comments to the blog, there is a site called http://md5.rednoize.com/ that reveals that the hash is "Anthony." So although Google helped, there appears to be resources online for it (if you don't have your own Rainbow Table mega database).
Another reverse md5 hash lookup
I have to agree with everyone else so far, pass the Salt. -
MD5 Lookup Site & NamesFor those of you who missed it in the article, the has was: 20f1aeb7819d7858684c898d1e98c1bb And sure enough, if you read the comments to the blog, there is a site called http://md5.rednoize.com/ that reveals that the hash is "Anthony." So although Google helped, there appears to be resources online for it (if you don't have your own Rainbow Table mega database).
He could have discovered this if he had used a database complete with names, something I don't think would have been too difficult for him.
This Google search idea is kind of moot if the user uses some very basic password construction such as what I've commented on before. Also, as the blog mentions, this discussion is worthless if WordPress used salting which is related to nonces used in security engineering. I think that stuff has been around for, what about five years now? Wake up WordPress! -
Re:My Question...
Look up a1d0c6e83f027327d8461063f4ac58a6 at http://md5.rednoize.com/