Domain: royalmail.com
Stories and comments across the archive that link to royalmail.com.
Comments · 18
-
Re:UK Post Office already does this
The commercial arm of the Royal Mail (not PostOffice Ltd) own the intellectual property of the PAF (Postal Address File) that has a strict data structure of how to store an address for verification purposes. See the PAF Digest PDF for a full 200 page specification of how to write a postal address.
important for orgs that process addresses and how to process data items like a "double dependent locality" and so on. many big UK companies totally fuck up addresses even though this is specified.
The main problem with this is that the Royal Mail was privitised so this publically funded data source has now been commercialised and the IPR owned by a company thanks to the tories.
-
Not new - just a new way to pay.
Come on everyone, this is just pre-paid franking. Nearly all european mail services (I have no idea about the rest of the world, sorry) offer this in various guises, usually only requiring an account with the company. Royal Mail in the UK offer their "SmartStamp" service allowing you to purchase your postage online. You don't have to be a company, and you use your home printer to print out the codes/franks on the letter. You can see it here: https://www.royalmail.com/portal/sme/content1?catId=62300709&mediaId=99400762
-
Re:That's nice, but
Just from last year's stamps alone in the UK --
Boyle, Newton, Franklin, Babbage, Rutherford: http://www.royalmail.com/portal/stamps/content1?catId=115800796&mediaId=116600770
Flemming, Ross, Hounsfield: http://www.royalmail.com/portal/stamps/content1?catId=127200772&mediaId=128800767
Darwin: http://www.royalmail.com/portal/stamps/content1?catId=91400755&mediaId=91500749
Watt, Stephenson, McAdam: http://www.royalmail.com/portal/stamps/content1?catId=93000750&mediaId=93000754
-
Re:That's nice, but
Just from last year's stamps alone in the UK --
Boyle, Newton, Franklin, Babbage, Rutherford: http://www.royalmail.com/portal/stamps/content1?catId=115800796&mediaId=116600770
Flemming, Ross, Hounsfield: http://www.royalmail.com/portal/stamps/content1?catId=127200772&mediaId=128800767
Darwin: http://www.royalmail.com/portal/stamps/content1?catId=91400755&mediaId=91500749
Watt, Stephenson, McAdam: http://www.royalmail.com/portal/stamps/content1?catId=93000750&mediaId=93000754
-
Re:That's nice, but
Just from last year's stamps alone in the UK --
Boyle, Newton, Franklin, Babbage, Rutherford: http://www.royalmail.com/portal/stamps/content1?catId=115800796&mediaId=116600770
Flemming, Ross, Hounsfield: http://www.royalmail.com/portal/stamps/content1?catId=127200772&mediaId=128800767
Darwin: http://www.royalmail.com/portal/stamps/content1?catId=91400755&mediaId=91500749
Watt, Stephenson, McAdam: http://www.royalmail.com/portal/stamps/content1?catId=93000750&mediaId=93000754
-
Re:That's nice, but
Just from last year's stamps alone in the UK --
Boyle, Newton, Franklin, Babbage, Rutherford: http://www.royalmail.com/portal/stamps/content1?catId=115800796&mediaId=116600770
Flemming, Ross, Hounsfield: http://www.royalmail.com/portal/stamps/content1?catId=127200772&mediaId=128800767
Darwin: http://www.royalmail.com/portal/stamps/content1?catId=91400755&mediaId=91500749
Watt, Stephenson, McAdam: http://www.royalmail.com/portal/stamps/content1?catId=93000750&mediaId=93000754
-
Re:What I want...
In the UK, we already have that - have had it for years in fact. Nobody uses it except the odd eBayer.
http://www.royalmail.com/portal/rm/olpui
Basically, you pay, print, post.
-
Re:Not Much Cross-Platform
I also use Evince.
The only problem I've had was that Royal Mail changed their pdf outputs for online postage so that when viewed they were obscured by the word "Sample" which was supposed to disappear when printed and didn't. My solution was to stop using Royal Mail's online service.
Evince is so much better than Adobe Reader, for my needs.
-
Re:Vacuum
Not all of them. Some of them you can't lick at all.
-
Re:I still oppose anonymous registration
You could just as well get a PO box...
Taking my former blog site as an example:
I run a private little website as a hobby.
I pay $25 per year for hosting (reasonable quality host, 75MB disk space and 3GB monthly bandwidth, email, the lot).
I pay £3.69 per year (~$7-$8) for a .co.uk domain or $9 per year for a .com.
Total normally: about $35 per year, tops.
The Registrars follow your "must show details" and I suddenly have to pay £58 per year (~$120) to get a PO Box, or twice that if I don't want to have to keep checking it but instead have it delivered to my real address? (UK PO Box prices)
Total with PO Box: at least $150 to $250!
I think the only thing I can say there is "WTF? Hell, no!" That's a ridiculous amount of expense compared to the website itself. -
Re:Non-American listeners?
"Please enter your Postcode Due to licensing changes, we're only allowed to offer our radio stream to those in the UK. You seem to be outside the UK, so you need to enter a valid UK postcode below:"
Still illegal. Thanks for trying, though!
Go to Google's map of the UK and choose where you live. http://maps.google.com/maps?f=q&hl=en&geocode=&q=
U K&ie=UTF8&ll=53.080827,-3.032227&spn=5.095991,21.1 37695&z=6&om=1Then go to the Royal Mail and look up your post code. http://www.royalmail.com/portal/rm/postcodefinder
Beef.
-
Re:MS interoperability
There are some accessibility rules: in particular the Disability Discrimination Act 1995. (Article on DDA and web accessibility). Royal Mail even seems to recognise this - they have a page on accessibility, which appears to use apostrophes that Lynx doesn't render (unless they just don't use apostrophes at all). They do provide for feedback, so I'll let them know how badly they fare in Lynx and Mozilla, and maybe you could too.
-
Re:Judge Green and the MFJYes, you would. The reason for the reduction in price compared to 20 years ago is that technology advances and becomes cheaper over time. Improvements also occurred in the twenty years before the monopoly was broken up.
In the UK, recently we've had one of our communications services - the Royal Mail - go through a privatisation process. Its first step, of course, was to reduce service levels while spending more advertising "new" (existing renamed) services to give the impression that it is more innovative.
The motive has switched to profit. -
Re:Brit spacecraft?
British-made spacecraft? Damn, that's gonna be impossible to find parts for.
On Mars? I'd have to agree it'll be difficult but Parcel Force might still be able to deliver. :-) -
Relevant link (Re:UK did it first)The services were described in a 2000 review by the British Computer Society - the initiatives were Physical to Electronic (PTE) that scans incoming mail and deliver them in electronic format, and RelayOne that lets you e-mail people without Internet access, for the mail to be printed and sent by post, worldwide.
I could not get any information from Royal Mail's current website though. Anyone ever tried those services?
-
Re:If they want it over with...
The Royal Mail sell stamps by mail order, and they will deliver abroad. So, find out how much postage will cost on their Airmail price list (Argentina is zone 1 for their pricing system) and then buy the stamps necessary online. They'll even throw in the airmail stickers for free
;-) -
Re:If they want it over with...
The Royal Mail sell stamps by mail order, and they will deliver abroad. So, find out how much postage will cost on their Airmail price list (Argentina is zone 1 for their pricing system) and then buy the stamps necessary online. They'll even throw in the airmail stickers for free
;-) -
Re:The data mining level is pretty astonishing
Well, this is a pretty grungy thing to argue about, but...
:)
That red circle just shows you where the postcode's centred. It's the same size at all zoom levels. As it happens, that postcode really does only refer to one property, because it's such a big one (NTL's Nottingham office as it happens). Most postcodes are far less precise. My old house was in the same postcode as fourteen different properties. My grandmother shares a postcode with fifteen other houses. Right now I'm living in a house which shares a postcode with thirty two other addresses. You can try it out with any postcode you like at Postcodes On-line.
And US zip codes are even larger. Just to pluck a (fairly vague) page at random, this map of the town of Salem, Oregon shows the zip codes for various areas. Each code covers several streets, and potentially thousands of residences.
So there. :)