Slashdot Mirror

http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1591778&cid=31755996

"But the 3.6.2 update was ALREADY released WELL BEFORE the story was posted (Tuesday March 23, @02:51AM Eastern): https://developer.mozilla.org/devnews/index.php/2010/03/22/firefox-3-6-2-update-now-available-as-free-download/ Firefox 3.6.2 update now available as free download Version 3.6.2 was released THE DAY BEFORE this story even posted! Once again you are caught in your BOLD-FACED LIES, LOL! - by clone53421 (1310749) on Monday April 05, @01:36PM (#31736454) Journal

Clone - How stupid do you feel? FireFox turned up YET ANOTHER SECURITY BUG & right when you shot your big libellous mouth off in that quote above on 04/05/2010 above

(Thus, yet another security bug surfaced in FireFox 3.6.2 in that time frame, yet again, 2x that week it appears (LOL!)).

Clone - How stupid do you feel?

----

Mozilla Firefox DOM Node Moving Use-After-Free Vulnerability:

http://secunia.com/advisories/39175/

Release Date 2010-04-02
Last Update 2010-04-06

----

Now everyone here will see how stupid you are, repeatedly, in all of your posts... lol!

Clone - tell us, what came out the next day after you posted your crap I quoted above, Clone the CLOWN, you utter dimwit?

FireFox 3.6.3!

Why?? Because YET ANOTHER SECURITY VULNERABILITY SURFACED THAT DAY OR THE NEXT DAY in FIREFOX, YET AGAIN, lmao...

"too, Too, TOO EASY!"

Obviously clone the clown, you lost yet again, and you obviously have done nothing with your wasted life, based on such a stupid mistake on your part above CLOWN. Obviously, You're too stupid to exist CLOWN, and it's no small wonder that all you do is post on slashdot all day, as you don't have enough skills or degrees necessary to your name in computing to actually have or hold a job in the sciences of computing.

You seem to be looking for the Secunia Online Software Inspector (OSI). It will scan your Windows OS plus common applications and plugins (including Flash and Java) to tell you whether any are out of date from a security point of view. Warnings about out of date programs include a link to the updated versions.

Ironically, the software is written in Java. The online scanner doesn't require any installation, though Secunia does offer an installable version.

"One browser can be taken down by others? I thought they should have been competing on technical excellence instead of name recognition" - by headkase (533448) on Friday April 09, @03:22PM (#31793430)

Agreed headcase, & here is WHY (w/ backing evidences).

Well, Opera's KING IN SPEED in BOTH HTML related parsing work PLUS JAVASCRIPT SPEED (especially on the MOST USED PLATFORM THERE IS IN COMPUTING, in Windows)... &, security too (less security bugs in current builds) read on:

NOW, as far as "SPEED & SECURITY" online, & Opera vs. FireFox vs. IE?? Ok:

====

A.) For SPEED (& Opera led there for the LONGEST TIME, yes, even in javascript for the LONGEST time, until FF's new engines took its place (until Opera 10.50 @ least, because that's gotten a decent "boost" in that area -> http://tech.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=09/12/22/1911216 (not that it matters though, speeding up javascript is like asking to get infected by malscripted sites &/or adbanners faster imo @ least - that of a "POV" of PC security, mostly)):

http://www.howtocreate.co.uk/browserSpeed.html

and

http://crave.cnet.co.uk/cnetuk/crave/software/0,39029471,49302491,00.htm

AND

http://nontroppo.org/timer/kestrel_tests/

(Opera "rocked the planet" in those cases... bigtime (& ESPECIALLY ON THE MOST USED PLATFORM THERE IS, BAR-NONE, FOR PC-COMPUTING: Windows!))

----

AND, for SECURITY also (less vulnerabilities present over time than IE or FF, per SECUNIA.COM stats):

INTERNET EXPLORER 8.x VULNERABILITIES STATS:(04/10/2010)

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/21625/?task=advisories

(UNPATCHED = 4-8 / 50% (though 1 of them, the "Critical 'Out-of-Band' Cumulative Update IS patched, as of about 1 hr. ago (go get it those of you that use MS OS' that is...)))

---

FIREFOX 3.x VULNERABILITIES STATS:(04/10/2010)

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/25800/?task=statistics

(UNPATCHED = 0-8 / 0% (on this note, as you can see? FF's current build's had MORE advisories, over time as I noted, vs. Opera's current build) but...

FF's team HAS done a GREAT JOB in stopping that much faster than usual the past year or two now (now, the same has to be said for their browser addons too, but that too, improves over time as well usually))...

However, the last bug in 3.6 a week or two back?

FF Turned up another one shortly after, forcing 3.6.2 to issue!

Which again, turned up another security bug, forcing 3.6.3 to issue... Which, shows the "holes" but, it also (in FF's defense) showing the FF team's doing their job diligently too... & I've helped the FF team spot bugs before, years ago, when it was the build before FireFOX (FireBird iirc? Not sure anymore!).

Most Critical Unpatched

There are no unpatched Secunia advisories affecting this product, when all vendor patches are applied..

----

OPERA 10.x VULNERABILITIES STATS:(04/10/2010)

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/26745/?task=statistics

(UNPATCHED = 0-5 / 0% ) - 5 Opera has a BIG "share-of-market" on MOBILE DEVICES as well, & is big in EUROPE (though stats don't tend to show it, because like many others, I tend to "IDENTIFY AS IE" in Opera, so I get somewhat better "IE based" page renderings on SOME sites (this happens, too bad) & that's something others seem to overlook QUITE A BIT too)...

Once more, imo @ least? Well

"One browser can be taken down by others? I thought they should have been competing on technical excellence instead of name recognition" - by headkase (533448) on Friday April 09, @03:22PM (#31793430)

Agreed headcase, & here is WHY (w/ backing evidences).

Well, Opera's KING IN SPEED in BOTH HTML related parsing work PLUS JAVASCRIPT SPEED (especially on the MOST USED PLATFORM THERE IS IN COMPUTING, in Windows)... &, security too (less security bugs in current builds) read on:

NOW, as far as "SPEED & SECURITY" online, & Opera vs. FireFox vs. IE?? Ok:

====

A.) For SPEED (& Opera led there for the LONGEST TIME, yes, even in javascript for the LONGEST time, until FF's new engines took its place (until Opera 10.50 @ least, because that's gotten a decent "boost" in that area -> http://tech.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=09/12/22/1911216 (not that it matters though, speeding up javascript is like asking to get infected by malscripted sites &/or adbanners faster imo @ least - that of a "POV" of PC security, mostly)):

http://www.howtocreate.co.uk/browserSpeed.html

and

http://crave.cnet.co.uk/cnetuk/crave/software/0,39029471,49302491,00.htm

AND

http://nontroppo.org/timer/kestrel_tests/

(Opera "rocked the planet" in those cases... bigtime (& ESPECIALLY ON THE MOST USED PLATFORM THERE IS, BAR-NONE, FOR PC-COMPUTING: Windows!))

----

AND, for SECURITY also (less vulnerabilities present over time than IE or FF, per SECUNIA.COM stats):

INTERNET EXPLORER 8.x VULNERABILITIES STATS:(04/10/2010)

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/21625/?task=advisories

(UNPATCHED = 4-8 / 50% (though 1 of them, the "Critical 'Out-of-Band' Cumulative Update IS patched, as of about 1 hr. ago (go get it those of you that use MS OS' that is...)))

---

FIREFOX 3.x VULNERABILITIES STATS:(04/10/2010)

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/25800/?task=statistics

(UNPATCHED = 0-8 / 0% (on this note, as you can see? FF's current build's had MORE advisories, over time as I noted, vs. Opera's current build) but...

FF's team HAS done a GREAT JOB in stopping that much faster than usual the past year or two now (now, the same has to be said for their browser addons too, but that too, improves over time as well usually))...

However, the last bug in 3.6 a week or two back?

FF Turned up another one shortly after, forcing 3.6.2 to issue!

Which again, turned up another security bug, forcing 3.6.3 to issue... Which, shows the "holes" but, it also (in FF's defense) showing the FF team's doing their job diligently too... & I've helped the FF team spot bugs before, years ago, when it was the build before FireFOX (FireBird iirc? Not sure anymore!).

Most Critical Unpatched

There are no unpatched Secunia advisories affecting this product, when all vendor patches are applied..

----

OPERA 10.x VULNERABILITIES STATS:(04/10/2010)

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/26745/?task=statistics

(UNPATCHED = 0-5 / 0% ) - 5 Opera has a BIG "share-of-market" on MOBILE DEVICES as well, & is big in EUROPE (though stats don't tend to show it, because like many others, I tend to "IDENTIFY AS IE" in Opera, so I get somewhat better "IE based" page renderings on SOME sites (this happens, too bad) & that's something others seem to overlook QUITE A BIT too)...

Once more, imo @ least? Well

"One browser can be taken down by others? I thought they should have been competing on technical excellence instead of name recognition" - by headkase (533448) on Friday April 09, @03:22PM (#31793430)

Agreed headcase, & here is WHY (w/ backing evidences).

Well, Opera's KING IN SPEED in BOTH HTML related parsing work PLUS JAVASCRIPT SPEED (especially on the MOST USED PLATFORM THERE IS IN COMPUTING, in Windows)... &, security too (less security bugs in current builds) read on:

NOW, as far as "SPEED & SECURITY" online, & Opera vs. FireFox vs. IE?? Ok:

====

A.) For SPEED (& Opera led there for the LONGEST TIME, yes, even in javascript for the LONGEST time, until FF's new engines took its place (until Opera 10.50 @ least, because that's gotten a decent "boost" in that area -> http://tech.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=09/12/22/1911216 (not that it matters though, speeding up javascript is like asking to get infected by malscripted sites &/or adbanners faster imo @ least - that of a "POV" of PC security, mostly)):

http://www.howtocreate.co.uk/browserSpeed.html

and

http://crave.cnet.co.uk/cnetuk/crave/software/0,39029471,49302491,00.htm

AND

http://nontroppo.org/timer/kestrel_tests/

(Opera "rocked the planet" in those cases... bigtime (& ESPECIALLY ON THE MOST USED PLATFORM THERE IS, BAR-NONE, FOR PC-COMPUTING: Windows!))

----

AND, for SECURITY also (less vulnerabilities present over time than IE or FF, per SECUNIA.COM stats):

INTERNET EXPLORER 8.x VULNERABILITIES STATS:(04/10/2010)

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/21625/?task=advisories

(UNPATCHED = 4-8 / 50% (though 1 of them, the "Critical 'Out-of-Band' Cumulative Update IS patched, as of about 1 hr. ago (go get it those of you that use MS OS' that is...)))

---

FIREFOX 3.x VULNERABILITIES STATS:(04/10/2010)

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/25800/?task=statistics

(UNPATCHED = 0-8 / 0% (on this note, as you can see? FF's current build's had MORE advisories, over time as I noted, vs. Opera's current build) but...

FF's team HAS done a GREAT JOB in stopping that much faster than usual the past year or two now (now, the same has to be said for their browser addons too, but that too, improves over time as well usually))...

However, the last bug in 3.6 a week or two back?

FF Turned up another one shortly after, forcing 3.6.2 to issue!

Which again, turned up another security bug, forcing 3.6.3 to issue... Which, shows the "holes" but, it also (in FF's defense) showing the FF team's doing their job diligently too... & I've helped the FF team spot bugs before, years ago, when it was the build before FireFOX (FireBird iirc? Not sure anymore!).

Most Critical Unpatched

There are no unpatched Secunia advisories affecting this product, when all vendor patches are applied..

----

OPERA 10.x VULNERABILITIES STATS:(04/10/2010)

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/26745/?task=statistics

(UNPATCHED = 0-5 / 0% ) - 5 Opera has a BIG "share-of-market" on MOBILE DEVICES as well, & is big in EUROPE (though stats don't tend to show it, because like many others, I tend to "IDENTIFY AS IE" in Opera, so I get somewhat better "IE based" page renderings on SOME sites (this happens, too bad) & that's something others seem to overlook QUITE A BIT too)...

Once more, imo @ least? Well

"FF loads in about 1-2 seconds on my machine. I'm calling bullshit - by Beelzebud (1361137) on Friday April 09, @04:26PM (#31794344)

Well, Opera's KING IN SPEED in BOTH HTML related parsing work PLUS JAVASCRIPT SPEED (especially on the MOST USED PLATFORM THERE IS IN COMPUTING, in Windows)... &, security too (less security bugs in current builds) read on:

(Not sure what sort of "b.s." you're calling there Beezel, but I'd like to show you a few current stats, tests of speed (BOTH old & new/current no less) on the subject's of both SPEED and SECURITY in webbrowsers in the "BIG 3" @ least, as a sort of "FYI" for you, & others, reading...!)

NOW, as far as "SPEED & SECURITY" online, & Opera vs. FireFox vs. IE?? Ok:

====

A.) For SPEED (& Opera led there for the LONGEST TIME, yes, even in javascript for the LONGEST time, until FF's new engines took its place (until Opera 10.50 @ least, because that's gotten a decent "boost" in that area -> http://tech.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=09/12/22/1911216 (not that it matters though, speeding up javascript is like asking to get infected by malscripted sites &/or adbanners faster imo @ least - that of a "POV" of PC security, mostly)):

http://www.howtocreate.co.uk/browserSpeed.html

and

http://crave.cnet.co.uk/cnetuk/crave/software/0,39029471,49302491,00.htm

AND

http://nontroppo.org/timer/kestrel_tests/

(Opera "rocked the planet" in those cases... bigtime (& ESPECIALLY ON THE MOST USED PLATFORM THERE IS, BAR-NONE, FOR PC-COMPUTING: Windows!))

----

AND, for SECURITY also (less vulnerabilities present over time than IE or FF, per SECUNIA.COM stats):

INTERNET EXPLORER 8.x VULNERABILITIES STATS:(04/10/2010)

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/21625/?task=advisories

(UNPATCHED = 4-8 / 50% (though 1 of them, the "Critical 'Out-of-Band' Cumulative Update IS patched, as of about 1 hr. ago (go get it those of you that use MS OS' that is...)))

---

FIREFOX 3.x VULNERABILITIES STATS:(04/10/2010)

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/25800/?task=statistics

(UNPATCHED = 0-8 / 0% (on this note, as you can see? FF's current build's had MORE advisories, over time as I noted, vs. Opera's current build) but...

FF's team HAS done a GREAT JOB in stopping that much faster than usual the past year or two now (now, the same has to be said for their browser addons too, but that too, improves over time as well usually))...

However, the last bug in 3.6 a week or two back?

FF Turned up another one shortly after, forcing 3.6.2 to issue!

Which again, turned up another security bug, forcing 3.6.3 to issue... Which, shows the "holes" but, it also (in FF's defense) showing the FF team's doing their job diligently too... & I've helped the FF team spot bugs before, years ago, when it was the build before FireFOX (FireBird iirc? Not sure anymore!).

Most Critical Unpatched

There are no unpatched Secunia advisories affecting this product, when all vendor patches are applied..

----

OPERA 10.x VULNERABILITIES STATS:(04/10/2010)

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/26745/?task=statistics

(UNPATCHED = 0-5 / 0% ) - 5 Opera has a BIG "share-of-market" on MOBILE DEVICES as well, & is big in EUROPE (though stats don't tend to show it, because like many others, I tend to "IDENTIFY AS IE" in Opera, so I get somewhat better

"FF loads in about 1-2 seconds on my machine. I'm calling bullshit - by Beelzebud (1361137) on Friday April 09, @04:26PM (#31794344)

Well, Opera's KING IN SPEED in BOTH HTML related parsing work PLUS JAVASCRIPT SPEED (especially on the MOST USED PLATFORM THERE IS IN COMPUTING, in Windows)... &, security too (less security bugs in current builds) read on:

(Not sure what sort of "b.s." you're calling there Beezel, but I'd like to show you a few current stats, tests of speed (BOTH old & new/current no less) on the subject's of both SPEED and SECURITY in webbrowsers in the "BIG 3" @ least, as a sort of "FYI" for you, & others, reading...!)

NOW, as far as "SPEED & SECURITY" online, & Opera vs. FireFox vs. IE?? Ok:

====

A.) For SPEED (& Opera led there for the LONGEST TIME, yes, even in javascript for the LONGEST time, until FF's new engines took its place (until Opera 10.50 @ least, because that's gotten a decent "boost" in that area -> http://tech.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=09/12/22/1911216 (not that it matters though, speeding up javascript is like asking to get infected by malscripted sites &/or adbanners faster imo @ least - that of a "POV" of PC security, mostly)):

http://www.howtocreate.co.uk/browserSpeed.html

and

http://crave.cnet.co.uk/cnetuk/crave/software/0,39029471,49302491,00.htm

AND

http://nontroppo.org/timer/kestrel_tests/

(Opera "rocked the planet" in those cases... bigtime (& ESPECIALLY ON THE MOST USED PLATFORM THERE IS, BAR-NONE, FOR PC-COMPUTING: Windows!))

----

AND, for SECURITY also (less vulnerabilities present over time than IE or FF, per SECUNIA.COM stats):

INTERNET EXPLORER 8.x VULNERABILITIES STATS:(04/10/2010)

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/21625/?task=advisories

(UNPATCHED = 4-8 / 50% (though 1 of them, the "Critical 'Out-of-Band' Cumulative Update IS patched, as of about 1 hr. ago (go get it those of you that use MS OS' that is...)))

---

FIREFOX 3.x VULNERABILITIES STATS:(04/10/2010)

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/25800/?task=statistics

(UNPATCHED = 0-8 / 0% (on this note, as you can see? FF's current build's had MORE advisories, over time as I noted, vs. Opera's current build) but...

FF's team HAS done a GREAT JOB in stopping that much faster than usual the past year or two now (now, the same has to be said for their browser addons too, but that too, improves over time as well usually))...

However, the last bug in 3.6 a week or two back?

FF Turned up another one shortly after, forcing 3.6.2 to issue!

Which again, turned up another security bug, forcing 3.6.3 to issue... Which, shows the "holes" but, it also (in FF's defense) showing the FF team's doing their job diligently too... & I've helped the FF team spot bugs before, years ago, when it was the build before FireFOX (FireBird iirc? Not sure anymore!).

Most Critical Unpatched

There are no unpatched Secunia advisories affecting this product, when all vendor patches are applied..

----

OPERA 10.x VULNERABILITIES STATS:(04/10/2010)

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/26745/?task=statistics

(UNPATCHED = 0-5 / 0% ) - 5 Opera has a BIG "share-of-market" on MOBILE DEVICES as well, & is big in EUROPE (though stats don't tend to show it, because like many others, I tend to "IDENTIFY AS IE" in Opera, so I get somewhat better

"FF loads in about 1-2 seconds on my machine. I'm calling bullshit - by Beelzebud (1361137) on Friday April 09, @04:26PM (#31794344)

Well, Opera's KING IN SPEED in BOTH HTML related parsing work PLUS JAVASCRIPT SPEED (especially on the MOST USED PLATFORM THERE IS IN COMPUTING, in Windows)... &, security too (less security bugs in current builds) read on:

(Not sure what sort of "b.s." you're calling there Beezel, but I'd like to show you a few current stats, tests of speed (BOTH old & new/current no less) on the subject's of both SPEED and SECURITY in webbrowsers in the "BIG 3" @ least, as a sort of "FYI" for you, & others, reading...!)

NOW, as far as "SPEED & SECURITY" online, & Opera vs. FireFox vs. IE?? Ok:

====

A.) For SPEED (& Opera led there for the LONGEST TIME, yes, even in javascript for the LONGEST time, until FF's new engines took its place (until Opera 10.50 @ least, because that's gotten a decent "boost" in that area -> http://tech.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=09/12/22/1911216 (not that it matters though, speeding up javascript is like asking to get infected by malscripted sites &/or adbanners faster imo @ least - that of a "POV" of PC security, mostly)):

http://www.howtocreate.co.uk/browserSpeed.html

and

http://crave.cnet.co.uk/cnetuk/crave/software/0,39029471,49302491,00.htm

AND

http://nontroppo.org/timer/kestrel_tests/

(Opera "rocked the planet" in those cases... bigtime (& ESPECIALLY ON THE MOST USED PLATFORM THERE IS, BAR-NONE, FOR PC-COMPUTING: Windows!))

----

AND, for SECURITY also (less vulnerabilities present over time than IE or FF, per SECUNIA.COM stats):

INTERNET EXPLORER 8.x VULNERABILITIES STATS:(04/10/2010)

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/21625/?task=advisories

(UNPATCHED = 4-8 / 50% (though 1 of them, the "Critical 'Out-of-Band' Cumulative Update IS patched, as of about 1 hr. ago (go get it those of you that use MS OS' that is...)))

---

FIREFOX 3.x VULNERABILITIES STATS:(04/10/2010)

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/25800/?task=statistics

(UNPATCHED = 0-8 / 0% (on this note, as you can see? FF's current build's had MORE advisories, over time as I noted, vs. Opera's current build) but...

FF's team HAS done a GREAT JOB in stopping that much faster than usual the past year or two now (now, the same has to be said for their browser addons too, but that too, improves over time as well usually))...

However, the last bug in 3.6 a week or two back?

FF Turned up another one shortly after, forcing 3.6.2 to issue!

Which again, turned up another security bug, forcing 3.6.3 to issue... Which, shows the "holes" but, it also (in FF's defense) showing the FF team's doing their job diligently too... & I've helped the FF team spot bugs before, years ago, when it was the build before FireFOX (FireBird iirc? Not sure anymore!).

Most Critical Unpatched

There are no unpatched Secunia advisories affecting this product, when all vendor patches are applied..

----

OPERA 10.x VULNERABILITIES STATS:(04/10/2010)

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/26745/?task=statistics

(UNPATCHED = 0-5 / 0% ) - 5 Opera has a BIG "share-of-market" on MOBILE DEVICES as well, & is big in EUROPE (though stats don't tend to show it, because like many others, I tend to "IDENTIFY AS IE" in Opera, so I get somewhat better

Well, Opera's KING IN SPEED in BOTH HTML related parsing work PLUS JAVASCRIPT SPEED (especially on the MOST USED PLATFORM THERE IS IN COMPUTING, in Windows)... &, security too (less security bugs in current builds) read on:

NOW, as far as "SPEED & SECURITY" online, & Opera vs. FireFox vs. IE?? Ok:

====

A.) For SPEED (& Opera led there for the LONGEST TIME, yes, even in javascript for the LONGEST time, until FF's new engines took its place (until Opera 10.50 @ least, because that's gotten a decent "boost" in that area -> http://tech.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=09/12/22/1911216 (not that it matters though, speeding up javascript is like asking to get infected by malscripted sites &/or adbanners faster imo @ least - that of a "POV" of PC security, mostly)):

http://www.howtocreate.co.uk/browserSpeed.html

and

http://crave.cnet.co.uk/cnetuk/crave/software/0,39029471,49302491,00.htm

AND

http://nontroppo.org/timer/kestrel_tests/

(Opera "rocked the planet" in those cases... bigtime (& ESPECIALLY ON THE MOST USED PLATFORM THERE IS, BAR-NONE, FOR PC-COMPUTING: Windows!))

----

AND, for SECURITY also (less vulnerabilities present over time than IE or FF, per SECUNIA.COM stats):

INTERNET EXPLORER 8.x VULNERABILITIES STATS:(04/10/2010)

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/21625/?task=advisories

(UNPATCHED = 4-8 / 50% (though 1 of them, the "Critical 'Out-of-Band' Cumulative Update IS patched, as of about 1 hr. ago (go get it those of you that use MS OS' that is...)))

---

FIREFOX 3.x VULNERABILITIES STATS:(04/10/2010)

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/25800/?task=statistics

(UNPATCHED = 0-8 / 0% (on this note, as you can see? FF's current build's had MORE advisories, over time as I noted, vs. Opera's current build) but...

FF's team HAS done a GREAT JOB in stopping that much faster than usual the past year or two now (now, the same has to be said for their browser addons too, but that too, improves over time as well usually))...

However, the last bug in 3.6 a week or two back?

FF Turned up another one shortly after, forcing 3.6.2 to issue!

Which again, turned up another security bug, forcing 3.6.3 to issue... Which, shows the "holes" but, it also (in FF's defense) showing the FF team's doing their job diligently too... & I've helped the FF team spot bugs before, years ago, when it was the build before FireFOX (FireBird iirc? Not sure anymore!).

Most Critical Unpatched

There are no unpatched Secunia advisories affecting this product, when all vendor patches are applied..

----

OPERA 10.x VULNERABILITIES STATS:(04/10/2010)

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/26745/?task=statistics

(UNPATCHED = 0-5 / 0% ) - 5 Opera has a BIG "share-of-market" on MOBILE DEVICES as well, & is big in EUROPE (though stats don't tend to show it, because like many others, I tend to "IDENTIFY AS IE" in Opera, so I get somewhat better "IE based" page renderings on SOME sites (this happens, too bad) & that's something others seem to overlook QUITE A BIT too)...

Once more, imo @ least? Well - Opera's great!

I.E.-> It took me away from being a FireFox user primarily in fact, because of it (& FF + IE have copied Opera's features RAMPANTLY over time (e.g.-> Tabbed Browsing anyone? As far as ADDONS also?? Heh, a LOT of what FF has in browser addons, Opera already has natively (

Well, Opera's KING IN SPEED in BOTH HTML related parsing work PLUS JAVASCRIPT SPEED (especially on the MOST USED PLATFORM THERE IS IN COMPUTING, in Windows)... &, security too (less security bugs in current builds) read on:

NOW, as far as "SPEED & SECURITY" online, & Opera vs. FireFox vs. IE?? Ok:

====

A.) For SPEED (& Opera led there for the LONGEST TIME, yes, even in javascript for the LONGEST time, until FF's new engines took its place (until Opera 10.50 @ least, because that's gotten a decent "boost" in that area -> http://tech.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=09/12/22/1911216 (not that it matters though, speeding up javascript is like asking to get infected by malscripted sites &/or adbanners faster imo @ least - that of a "POV" of PC security, mostly)):

http://www.howtocreate.co.uk/browserSpeed.html

and

http://crave.cnet.co.uk/cnetuk/crave/software/0,39029471,49302491,00.htm

AND

http://nontroppo.org/timer/kestrel_tests/

(Opera "rocked the planet" in those cases... bigtime (& ESPECIALLY ON THE MOST USED PLATFORM THERE IS, BAR-NONE, FOR PC-COMPUTING: Windows!))

----

AND, for SECURITY also (less vulnerabilities present over time than IE or FF, per SECUNIA.COM stats):

INTERNET EXPLORER 8.x VULNERABILITIES STATS:(04/10/2010)

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/21625/?task=advisories

(UNPATCHED = 4-8 / 50% (though 1 of them, the "Critical 'Out-of-Band' Cumulative Update IS patched, as of about 1 hr. ago (go get it those of you that use MS OS' that is...)))

---

FIREFOX 3.x VULNERABILITIES STATS:(04/10/2010)

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/25800/?task=statistics

(UNPATCHED = 0-8 / 0% (on this note, as you can see? FF's current build's had MORE advisories, over time as I noted, vs. Opera's current build) but...

FF's team HAS done a GREAT JOB in stopping that much faster than usual the past year or two now (now, the same has to be said for their browser addons too, but that too, improves over time as well usually))...

However, the last bug in 3.6 a week or two back?

FF Turned up another one shortly after, forcing 3.6.2 to issue!

Which again, turned up another security bug, forcing 3.6.3 to issue... Which, shows the "holes" but, it also (in FF's defense) showing the FF team's doing their job diligently too... & I've helped the FF team spot bugs before, years ago, when it was the build before FireFOX (FireBird iirc? Not sure anymore!).

Most Critical Unpatched

There are no unpatched Secunia advisories affecting this product, when all vendor patches are applied..

----

OPERA 10.x VULNERABILITIES STATS:(04/10/2010)

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/26745/?task=statistics

(UNPATCHED = 0-5 / 0% ) - 5 Opera has a BIG "share-of-market" on MOBILE DEVICES as well, & is big in EUROPE (though stats don't tend to show it, because like many others, I tend to "IDENTIFY AS IE" in Opera, so I get somewhat better "IE based" page renderings on SOME sites (this happens, too bad) & that's something others seem to overlook QUITE A BIT too)...

Once more, imo @ least? Well - Opera's great!

I.E.-> It took me away from being a FireFox user primarily in fact, because of it (& FF + IE have copied Opera's features RAMPANTLY over time (e.g.-> Tabbed Browsing anyone? As far as ADDONS also?? Heh, a LOT of what FF has in browser addons, Opera already has natively (

Well, Opera's KING IN SPEED in BOTH HTML related parsing work PLUS JAVASCRIPT SPEED (especially on the MOST USED PLATFORM THERE IS IN COMPUTING, in Windows)... &, security too (less security bugs in current builds) read on:

NOW, as far as "SPEED & SECURITY" online, & Opera vs. FireFox vs. IE?? Ok:

====

A.) For SPEED (& Opera led there for the LONGEST TIME, yes, even in javascript for the LONGEST time, until FF's new engines took its place (until Opera 10.50 @ least, because that's gotten a decent "boost" in that area -> http://tech.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=09/12/22/1911216 (not that it matters though, speeding up javascript is like asking to get infected by malscripted sites &/or adbanners faster imo @ least - that of a "POV" of PC security, mostly)):

http://www.howtocreate.co.uk/browserSpeed.html

and

http://crave.cnet.co.uk/cnetuk/crave/software/0,39029471,49302491,00.htm

AND

http://nontroppo.org/timer/kestrel_tests/

(Opera "rocked the planet" in those cases... bigtime (& ESPECIALLY ON THE MOST USED PLATFORM THERE IS, BAR-NONE, FOR PC-COMPUTING: Windows!))

----

AND, for SECURITY also (less vulnerabilities present over time than IE or FF, per SECUNIA.COM stats):

INTERNET EXPLORER 8.x VULNERABILITIES STATS:(04/10/2010)

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/21625/?task=advisories

(UNPATCHED = 4-8 / 50% (though 1 of them, the "Critical 'Out-of-Band' Cumulative Update IS patched, as of about 1 hr. ago (go get it those of you that use MS OS' that is...)))

---

FIREFOX 3.x VULNERABILITIES STATS:(04/10/2010)

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/25800/?task=statistics

(UNPATCHED = 0-8 / 0% (on this note, as you can see? FF's current build's had MORE advisories, over time as I noted, vs. Opera's current build) but...

FF's team HAS done a GREAT JOB in stopping that much faster than usual the past year or two now (now, the same has to be said for their browser addons too, but that too, improves over time as well usually))...

However, the last bug in 3.6 a week or two back?

FF Turned up another one shortly after, forcing 3.6.2 to issue!

Which again, turned up another security bug, forcing 3.6.3 to issue... Which, shows the "holes" but, it also (in FF's defense) showing the FF team's doing their job diligently too... & I've helped the FF team spot bugs before, years ago, when it was the build before FireFOX (FireBird iirc? Not sure anymore!).

Most Critical Unpatched

There are no unpatched Secunia advisories affecting this product, when all vendor patches are applied..

----

OPERA 10.x VULNERABILITIES STATS:(04/10/2010)

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/26745/?task=statistics

(UNPATCHED = 0-5 / 0% ) - 5 Opera has a BIG "share-of-market" on MOBILE DEVICES as well, & is big in EUROPE (though stats don't tend to show it, because like many others, I tend to "IDENTIFY AS IE" in Opera, so I get somewhat better "IE based" page renderings on SOME sites (this happens, too bad) & that's something others seem to overlook QUITE A BIT too)...

Once more, imo @ least? Well - Opera's great!

I.E.-> It took me away from being a FireFox user primarily in fact, because of it (& FF + IE have copied Opera's features RAMPANTLY over time (e.g.-> Tabbed Browsing anyone? As far as ADDONS also?? Heh, a LOT of what FF has in browser addons, Opera already has natively (

"They really just need to go on a diet. Hey guys; remember how it was supposed to be a fast browser? - y B5_geek (638928) on Friday April 09, @03:24PM (#31793472)

Agreed, & they've ALL (even Opera) gotten a bit "FAT" in RAM, but... keeping up off disk, vs. paging (i.e. - NOT being diskbound), helps speed!

(Even when paging back to the backing .exe file, which IS what apps do with say, resources that aren't visible in tabs & what not that's NOT being displayed currently + their in-memory caches - happens under GDI + user32 in Windows, but not under AERO though I have noticed)...

So, since your topic's about SPEED here?

Well, Opera's KING IN SPEED (especially on the MOST USED PLATFORM THERE IS IN COMPUTING, in Windows)... &, security too (less security bugs in current builds) read on:

NOW, as far as "SPEED & SECURITY" online, & Opera vs. FireFox vs. IE?? Ok:

====

A.) For SPEED (& Opera led there for the LONGEST TIME, yes, even in javascript for the LONGEST time, until FF's new engines took its place (until Opera 10.50 @ least, because that's gotten a decent "boost" in that area -> http://tech.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=09/12/22/1911216 (not that it matters though, speeding up javascript is like asking to get infected by malscripted sites &/or adbanners faster imo @ least - that of a "POV" of PC security, mostly)):

http://www.howtocreate.co.uk/browserSpeed.html

and

http://crave.cnet.co.uk/cnetuk/crave/software/0,39029471,49302491,00.htm

AND

http://nontroppo.org/timer/kestrel_tests/

(Opera "rocked the planet" in those cases... bigtime (& ESPECIALLY ON THE MOST USED PLATFORM THERE IS, BAR-NONE, FOR PC-COMPUTING: Windows!))

----

AND, for SECURITY also (less vulnerabilities present over time than IE or FF, per SECUNIA.COM stats):

INTERNET EXPLORER 8.x VULNERABILITIES STATS:(04/10/2010)

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/21625/?task=advisories

(UNPATCHED = 4-8 / 50% (though 1 of them, the "Critical 'Out-of-Band' Cumulative Update IS patched, as of about 1 hr. ago (go get it those of you that use MS OS' that is...)))

---

FIREFOX 3.x VULNERABILITIES STATS:(04/10/2010)

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/25800/?task=statistics

(UNPATCHED = 0-8 / 0% (on this note, as you can see? FF's current build's had MORE advisories, over time as I noted, vs. Opera's current build) but...

FF's team HAS done a GREAT JOB in stopping that much faster than usual the past year or two now (now, the same has to be said for their browser addons too, but that too, improves over time as well usually))...

However, the last bug in 3.6 a week or two back?

FF Turned up another one shortly after, forcing 3.6.2 to issue!

Which again, turned up another security bug, forcing 3.6.3 to issue... s

Shows the "holes" but, it also (in FF's defense) showing the FF team's doing their job diligently too... & I've helped the FF team spot bugs before, years ago, when it was the build before FireFOX (FireBird iirc? Not sure anymore!).

Most Critical Unpatched

There are no unpatched Secunia advisories affecting this product, when all vendor patches are applied..

----

OPERA 10.x VULNERABILITIES STATS:(04/10/2010)

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/26745/?task=statistics

(UNPATCHED = 0-5 / 0% )

Most Critical Unpatched

The

"They really just need to go on a diet. Hey guys; remember how it was supposed to be a fast browser? - y B5_geek (638928) on Friday April 09, @03:24PM (#31793472)

Agreed, & they've ALL (even Opera) gotten a bit "FAT" in RAM, but... keeping up off disk, vs. paging (i.e. - NOT being diskbound), helps speed!

(Even when paging back to the backing .exe file, which IS what apps do with say, resources that aren't visible in tabs & what not that's NOT being displayed currently + their in-memory caches - happens under GDI + user32 in Windows, but not under AERO though I have noticed)...

So, since your topic's about SPEED here?

Well, Opera's KING IN SPEED (especially on the MOST USED PLATFORM THERE IS IN COMPUTING, in Windows)... &, security too (less security bugs in current builds) read on:

NOW, as far as "SPEED & SECURITY" online, & Opera vs. FireFox vs. IE?? Ok:

====

A.) For SPEED (& Opera led there for the LONGEST TIME, yes, even in javascript for the LONGEST time, until FF's new engines took its place (until Opera 10.50 @ least, because that's gotten a decent "boost" in that area -> http://tech.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=09/12/22/1911216 (not that it matters though, speeding up javascript is like asking to get infected by malscripted sites &/or adbanners faster imo @ least - that of a "POV" of PC security, mostly)):

http://www.howtocreate.co.uk/browserSpeed.html

and

http://crave.cnet.co.uk/cnetuk/crave/software/0,39029471,49302491,00.htm

AND

http://nontroppo.org/timer/kestrel_tests/

(Opera "rocked the planet" in those cases... bigtime (& ESPECIALLY ON THE MOST USED PLATFORM THERE IS, BAR-NONE, FOR PC-COMPUTING: Windows!))

----

AND, for SECURITY also (less vulnerabilities present over time than IE or FF, per SECUNIA.COM stats):

INTERNET EXPLORER 8.x VULNERABILITIES STATS:(04/10/2010)

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/21625/?task=advisories

(UNPATCHED = 4-8 / 50% (though 1 of them, the "Critical 'Out-of-Band' Cumulative Update IS patched, as of about 1 hr. ago (go get it those of you that use MS OS' that is...)))

---

FIREFOX 3.x VULNERABILITIES STATS:(04/10/2010)

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/25800/?task=statistics

(UNPATCHED = 0-8 / 0% (on this note, as you can see? FF's current build's had MORE advisories, over time as I noted, vs. Opera's current build) but...

FF's team HAS done a GREAT JOB in stopping that much faster than usual the past year or two now (now, the same has to be said for their browser addons too, but that too, improves over time as well usually))...

However, the last bug in 3.6 a week or two back?

FF Turned up another one shortly after, forcing 3.6.2 to issue!

Which again, turned up another security bug, forcing 3.6.3 to issue... s

Shows the "holes" but, it also (in FF's defense) showing the FF team's doing their job diligently too... & I've helped the FF team spot bugs before, years ago, when it was the build before FireFOX (FireBird iirc? Not sure anymore!).

Most Critical Unpatched

There are no unpatched Secunia advisories affecting this product, when all vendor patches are applied..

----

OPERA 10.x VULNERABILITIES STATS:(04/10/2010)

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/26745/?task=statistics

(UNPATCHED = 0-5 / 0% )

Most Critical Unpatched

The

"They really just need to go on a diet. Hey guys; remember how it was supposed to be a fast browser? - y B5_geek (638928) on Friday April 09, @03:24PM (#31793472)

Agreed, & they've ALL (even Opera) gotten a bit "FAT" in RAM, but... keeping up off disk, vs. paging (i.e. - NOT being diskbound), helps speed!

(Even when paging back to the backing .exe file, which IS what apps do with say, resources that aren't visible in tabs & what not that's NOT being displayed currently + their in-memory caches - happens under GDI + user32 in Windows, but not under AERO though I have noticed)...

So, since your topic's about SPEED here?

Well, Opera's KING IN SPEED (especially on the MOST USED PLATFORM THERE IS IN COMPUTING, in Windows)... &, security too (less security bugs in current builds) read on:

NOW, as far as "SPEED & SECURITY" online, & Opera vs. FireFox vs. IE?? Ok:

====

A.) For SPEED (& Opera led there for the LONGEST TIME, yes, even in javascript for the LONGEST time, until FF's new engines took its place (until Opera 10.50 @ least, because that's gotten a decent "boost" in that area -> http://tech.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=09/12/22/1911216 (not that it matters though, speeding up javascript is like asking to get infected by malscripted sites &/or adbanners faster imo @ least - that of a "POV" of PC security, mostly)):

http://www.howtocreate.co.uk/browserSpeed.html

and

http://crave.cnet.co.uk/cnetuk/crave/software/0,39029471,49302491,00.htm

AND

http://nontroppo.org/timer/kestrel_tests/

(Opera "rocked the planet" in those cases... bigtime (& ESPECIALLY ON THE MOST USED PLATFORM THERE IS, BAR-NONE, FOR PC-COMPUTING: Windows!))

----

AND, for SECURITY also (less vulnerabilities present over time than IE or FF, per SECUNIA.COM stats):

INTERNET EXPLORER 8.x VULNERABILITIES STATS:(04/10/2010)

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/21625/?task=advisories

(UNPATCHED = 4-8 / 50% (though 1 of them, the "Critical 'Out-of-Band' Cumulative Update IS patched, as of about 1 hr. ago (go get it those of you that use MS OS' that is...)))

---

FIREFOX 3.x VULNERABILITIES STATS:(04/10/2010)

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/25800/?task=statistics

(UNPATCHED = 0-8 / 0% (on this note, as you can see? FF's current build's had MORE advisories, over time as I noted, vs. Opera's current build) but...

FF's team HAS done a GREAT JOB in stopping that much faster than usual the past year or two now (now, the same has to be said for their browser addons too, but that too, improves over time as well usually))...

However, the last bug in 3.6 a week or two back?

FF Turned up another one shortly after, forcing 3.6.2 to issue!

Which again, turned up another security bug, forcing 3.6.3 to issue... s

Shows the "holes" but, it also (in FF's defense) showing the FF team's doing their job diligently too... & I've helped the FF team spot bugs before, years ago, when it was the build before FireFOX (FireBird iirc? Not sure anymore!).

Most Critical Unpatched

There are no unpatched Secunia advisories affecting this product, when all vendor patches are applied..

----

OPERA 10.x VULNERABILITIES STATS:(04/10/2010)

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/26745/?task=statistics

(UNPATCHED = 0-5 / 0% )

Most Critical Unpatched

The

[...] or even better run Filehippo update checker

Thanks, but I prefer Secunia's PSI. When it comes to security (patches), I trust Secunia more than FileHippo

"Certainly: "They never came for Opera". They did come for Opera; they recommended that people stop using it until this latest version patched the security flaw they found." - by clone53421 (1310749) on Thursday April 01, @08:29AM (#31699378)

Show us an article from a legitimate and reputable website that states that currently please. There's no reason for them to currently anyhow, lol! Why? Well... that's simply because Opera has NO KNOWN SECURITY VULNERABILITIES IN IT PRESENTLY either, by the way (see here):

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/26745/

Now - I do know that Germany said to stay away from both IE &/or FireFox, with proofs no less of that much rencently:

----

German government in Firefox warning -> http://www.independent.ie/business/technology/german-government-in-firefox-warning-2107853.html

and

German government warns citizens off IE -> http://www.techradar.com/news/internet/german-government-warns-citizens-off-ie-664181

----

However, I have yet to see that said of Opera by the German government.

So, that "all said & aside"? Well, per your quote above: Please produce your evidence of that quoted statement of yours above, and of any known security vulnerabilities in Opera.

(Thank you).

The reason I ask this, is simple: The German government even ADVISED THAT FOLKS SWITCH TO OPERA (doubtless because of its not having any known security vulnerabilities presently, per my SECUNIA.COM evidence thereof, above, no less)... see here:

----

"The German government is thus advising its citizens to use alternative browsers such as Mozilla's Firefox, Google Chrome, Apple Safari or Opera."

http://www.techradar.com/news/internet/german-government-warns-citizens-off-ie-664181

FireFox had a bug in 3.6 though, & Chrome bore multiple KNOWN vulnerabilities recently (now patched though) & it's not nearly as fast as Opera is (none of them are, especially on the most used OS platform there is, in Windows), BUT, Apple's Safari currently does -> http://secunia.com/advisories/product/25519/ ...

Guess that leaves Opera then, eh? Lmao... Ah, man - "too, Too, TOO EASY!". Just too easy...

----

Oh, also: Not "too clever" of you trying to laughingly "get that last word on me" - I won't allow it, lol! You're going to have to wake up a LOT earlier in the a.m., to even THINK I would let the "likes of you" (lol) even TRY to "get the better of", me.

APK

P.S.=> By the way, Clone (or, shall I say Sprocket, lol (your "alter ego" here no doubt)): Do you like the band, Alice in Chains??

If so, please - DO go to a doctor, & ask him to "Check My Brain"...

(Your brain that is, lol, & for its actual existence inside your cranium, because I believe that your brain, like your inability to produce a statement of the German's explicitly stating that their peoples stay away from Opera (as they had for both IE &/or FF above), or that Opera has known security issues currently, doesn't exist (lmao))... apk

"Certainly: "They never came for Opera". They did come for Opera; they recommended that people stop using it until this latest version patched the security flaw they found." - by clone53421 (1310749) on Thursday April 01, @08:29AM (#31699378)

Show us an article from a legitimate and reputable website that states that currently please. There's no reason for them to currently anyhow, lol! Why? Well... that's simply because Opera has NO KNOWN SECURITY VULNERABILITIES IN IT PRESENTLY either, by the way (see here):

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/26745/

Now - I do know that Germany said to stay away from both IE &/or FireFox, with proofs no less of that much rencently:

----

German government in Firefox warning -> http://www.independent.ie/business/technology/german-government-in-firefox-warning-2107853.html

and

German government warns citizens off IE -> http://www.techradar.com/news/internet/german-government-warns-citizens-off-ie-664181

----

However, I have yet to see that said of Opera by the German government.

So, that "all said & aside"? Well, per your quote above: Please produce your evidence of that quoted statement of yours above, and of any known security vulnerabilities in Opera.

(Thank you).

The reason I ask this, is simple: The German government even ADVISED THAT FOLKS SWITCH TO OPERA (doubtless because of its not having any known security vulnerabilities presently, per my SECUNIA.COM evidence thereof, above, no less)... see here:

----

"The German government is thus advising its citizens to use alternative browsers such as Mozilla's Firefox, Google Chrome, Apple Safari or Opera."

http://www.techradar.com/news/internet/german-government-warns-citizens-off-ie-664181

FireFox had a bug in 3.6 though, & Chrome bore multiple KNOWN vulnerabilities recently (now patched though) & it's not nearly as fast as Opera is (none of them are, especially on the most used OS platform there is, in Windows), BUT, Apple's Safari currently does -> http://secunia.com/advisories/product/25519/ ...

Guess that leaves Opera then, eh? Lmao... Ah, man - "too, Too, TOO EASY!". Just too easy...

----

Oh, also: Not "too clever" of you trying to laughingly "get that last word on me" - I won't allow it, lol! You're going to have to wake up a LOT earlier in the a.m., to even THINK I would let the "likes of you" (lol) even TRY to "get the better of", me.

APK

P.S.=> By the way, Clone (or, shall I say Sprocket, lol (your "alter ego" here no doubt)): Do you like the band, Alice in Chains??

If so, please - DO go to a doctor, & ask him to "Check My Brain"...

(Your brain that is, lol, & for its actual existence inside your cranium, because I believe that your brain, like your inability to produce a statement of the German's explicitly stating that their peoples stay away from Opera (as they had for both IE &/or FF above), or that Opera has known security issues currently, doesn't exist (lmao))... apk

"Certainly: "They never came for Opera". They did come for Opera; they recommended that people stop using it until this latest version patched the security flaw they found." - by clone53421 (1310749) on Thursday April 01, @08:29AM (#31699378)

Show us an article from a legitimate and reputable website that states that currently please. There's no reason for them to currently anyhow, lol! Why? Well... that's simply because Opera has NO KNOWN SECURITY VULNERABILITIES IN IT PRESENTLY either, by the way (see here):

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/26745/

Now - I do know that Germany said to stay away from both IE &/or FireFox, with proofs no less of that much rencently:

German government in Firefox warning -> http://www.independent.ie/business/technology/german-government-in-firefox-warning-2107853.html

and

German government warns citizens off IE -> http://www.techradar.com/news/internet/german-government-warns-citizens-off-ie-664181

However, I have yet to see that said of Opera by the German government.

Please produce your evidence of that quoted statement of yours above, and of any known security vulnerabilities in Opera.

(Thank you).

Oh, also: Not "too clever" of you trying to laughingly "get that last word on me" - I won't allow it, lol!

APK

P.S.=> By the way, Clone (or, shall I say Sprocket, lol (your "alter ego" here no doubt)): Do you like the band, Alice in Chains??

If so, please - DO go to a doctor, & ask him to "Check My Brain"...

(Your brain that is, lol, & for its actual existence inside your cranium, because I believe that your brain, like your inability to produce a statement of the German's explicitly stating that their peoples stay away from Opera (as they had for both IE &/or FF above), or that Opera has known security issues currently, doesn't exist (lmao))... apk

Perhaps he should have pointed a professional browser security evaluation site like Secunia.com

Okay. Here is the Secunia link about the same issue. That better for you?

"tl/dr" - by clone53421 (1310749) on Thursday March 25, @01:26PM (#31613624)

LMAO - oh man... whew! See subject-line... lol, "crying for mama", clone? You keep avoiding all the evidence in articles I put up below that evidence OPERA'S SUPERIOR SPEED IN ALL THINGS WEB vs. FF &/or IE even, AS WELL AS ITS SECURITY TRACKRECORD OVER TIME (currently too, recently, AND IN THE PAST TOO).

(Give us a break little troll, please... I can't keep laughing this hard!)

----

"Submit an article, troll." - by clone53421 (1310749) on Thursday March 25, @01:26PM (#31613624)

Uhm, Clone... I'm beginning to suspect you cannot read, because HOW MANY MORE OF THESE ARTICLES OF PROOF OF OPERA'S SUPERIORITY NOW & OVER TIME OF ITS SPEED VS. FF (even IE too) AS WELL AS ITS SECURITY TRACKRECORD vs. FF &/or IE?

AGAIN:

====

CURRENT DATA:

A.) For SECURITY (& Opera leads there for the LONGEST TIME, yes, even in least security vulnerabilities found over time, typically of the "big 3" webbrowsers)):

1.) iPhone, IE, Firefox, Safari get stomped at hacker contest -> (No Opera noted as "hosed" though, lol) http://www.theregister.co.uk/2010/03/25/pwn2own_2010_day_one/

AND, WHAT DOES A "HACKER/CRACKER"-SECURITY RESEARCHER TYPE CURRENTLY SAY, ABOUT OPERA (per Opera's showing in #1 above (which is, literally, "hot-off-the-press", from yesterday's news no less))?

OK:

----

http://www.theregister.co.uk/2010/03/25/pwn2own_2010_day_one/

"The problem Microsoft has is they have a big market share, said Vreugdenhil, the hacker who attacked IE. "I use Opera, but that's basically because it has a tiny market share and as far as I know, nobody is really interested in creating a drive-by download for opera. The web at the moment is pretty scary, actually."

----

AND, for SECURITY also (less vulnerabilities present over time than IE or FF, per SECUNIA.COM stats):

----

OPERA 10.x VULNERABILITIES STATS:(01/21/2010)

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/26745/?task=statistics

(UNPATCHED = 0% )

There are no unpatched Secunia advisories affecting this product, when all vendor patches are applied..

-----

B.) For SPEED (& Opera leads again there, & CONSISTENTLY + for the LONGEST TIME, yes, even in javascript for the LONGEST time, until FF's new engines took its place TEMPRARILY (until Opera 10.50 @ least, because that's gotten a decent "boost" in that area -> http://tech.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=09/12/22/1911216 (not that it matters though, speeding up javascript is like asking to get infected by malscripted sites &/or adbanners faster imo @ least - that of a "POV" of PC security, mostly)):

2.) SunSpider tests done here recently -> http://www.pcpro.co.uk/gallery/features/356350/on-test-the-hidden-seven-browsers-in-the-windows-ballot/145087 WHERE OPERA REGAINS ITS JAVASCRIPT PROCESSING SPEED LEAD OVER FF YET AGAIN!

OLDER DATA (on performance alone):

3.) And this one too last year also -> http://crave.cnet.co.uk/software/0,39029471,49302491,00.htm [cnet.co.uk]

4.) AND IT HAS BEEN "BLOWING AWAY" FIREFOX IN HTML PARSING/PROCESSING SPEEDS AS WELL, & FOR YEARS NOW, per this test years ago -> http://www.howtocreate.co.uk/browserSpeed.html#win [howtocreate.co.uk

"That is not an article, submitted to Slashdot, on which we can topically discuss the slowness or quickness of Opera and Firefox." - by clone53421 (1310749) on Thursday March 25, @12:51PM (#31612976)

See subject-line above, & face facts: You are just trying to troll me it seems, because all I ask of you, is to show me more current data on speed OR security, vs. what I put up below (which is current, recent, & PAST data as well, backing my points on OPERA's SUPERIORITY IN SPEED AND SECURITY, period... you can't disprove the data I use, & you've shot your mouth off & lost... face it, lol... man!)

"You seem to be incredibly stupid, or dense, or both. I'm sorry for you." - by clone53421 (1310749) on Thursday March 25, @12:51PM (#31612976)

Does it matter HOW I put the data out? I put up a TON OF THAT below... lol, you are putting up such a POOR SHOW in your losing + trolling here, that it's not even funny anymore... lol, though I have to laugh now, again. Thanks for the laughs @ least... you're "too, Too, TOO EASY" to get the better of for me, you really truly are. Thanks.

So, that "all said & aside", well - we have Yet more "icing on the cake" (per valid test evidences from respected websites of BOTH Opera's superior SPEED & SECURITY ONLINE for all things "web"):

====

CURRENT DATA:

A.) For SECURITY (& Opera leads there for the LONGEST TIME, yes, even in least security vulnerabilities found over time, typically of the "big 3" webbrowsers)):

1.) iPhone, IE, Firefox, Safari get stomped at hacker contest -> (No Opera noted as "hosed" though, lol) http://www.theregister.co.uk/2010/03/25/pwn2own_2010_day_one/

AND, WHAT DOES A "HACKER/CRACKER"-SECURITY RESEARCHER TYPE CURRENTLY SAY, ABOUT OPERA (per Opera's showing in #1 above (which is, literally, "hot-off-the-press", from yesterday's news no less))?

OK:

----

http://www.theregister.co.uk/2010/03/25/pwn2own_2010_day_one/

"The problem Microsoft has is they have a big market share, said Vreugdenhil, the hacker who attacked IE. "I use Opera, but that's basically because it has a tiny market share and as far as I know, nobody is really interested in creating a drive-by download for opera. The web at the moment is pretty scary, actually."

----

AND, for SECURITY also (less vulnerabilities present over time than IE or FF, per SECUNIA.COM stats):

----

OPERA 10.x VULNERABILITIES STATS:(01/21/2010)

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/26745/?task=statistics

(UNPATCHED = 0% )

There are no unpatched Secunia advisories affecting this product, when all vendor patches are applied..

-----

B.) For SPEED (& Opera leads again there, & CONSISTENTLY + for the LONGEST TIME, yes, even in javascript for the LONGEST time, until FF's new engines took its place TEMPRARILY (until Opera 10.50 @ least, because that's gotten a decent "boost" in that area -> http://tech.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=09/12/22/1911216 (not that it matters though, speeding up javascript is like asking to get infected by malscripted sites &/or adbanners faster imo @ least - that of a "POV" of PC security, mostly)):

2.) SunSpider tests done here recently -> http://www.pcpro.co.uk/gallery/features/356350/on-test-the-hidden-seven-browsers-in-the-windows-ballot/145087 WHERE OPERA REGAINS ITS JAVASCRIPT PROCESSING SPEED LEAD OVER FF YET AGAIN!

OLDER DATA (on performance alone):

3.)

"My "undoing", LOL? You really are grasping at straws." - by clone53421 (1310749) on Thursday March 25, @12:50PM (#31612950)

Yes, you avoid showing me data that is current + shows Firefox is faster than Opera is... OR, more secure!

(LOL, you're going to LOVE THIS NEXT ONE, as it's "hot off the presses" as to Opera security superiority, too, yet again & ABSOLUTELY current too!)

So, that "all said & aside", well - we have Yet more "icing on the cake" (per valid test evidences from respected websites of BOTH Opera's superior SPEED & SECURITY ONLINE for all things "web"):

====

CURRENT DATA:

A.) For SECURITY (& Opera leads there for the LONGEST TIME, yes, even in least security vulnerabilities found over time, typically of the "big 3" webbrowsers)):

1.) iPhone, IE, Firefox, Safari get stomped at hacker contest -> (No Opera noted as "hosed" though, lol) http://www.theregister.co.uk/2010/03/25/pwn2own_2010_day_one/

AND, WHAT DOES A "HACKER/CRACKER"-SECURITY RESEARCHER TYPE CURRENTLY SAY, ABOUT OPERA (per Opera's showing in #1 above (which is, literally, "hot-off-the-press", from yesterday's news no less))?

OK:

----

http://www.theregister.co.uk/2010/03/25/pwn2own_2010_day_one/

"The problem Microsoft has is they have a big market share, said Vreugdenhil, the hacker who attacked IE. "I use Opera, but that's basically because it has a tiny market share and as far as I know, nobody is really interested in creating a drive-by download for opera. The web at the moment is pretty scary, actually."

----

AND, for SECURITY also (less vulnerabilities present over time than IE or FF, per SECUNIA.COM stats):

----

OPERA 10.x VULNERABILITIES STATS:(01/21/2010)

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/26745/?task=statistics

(UNPATCHED = 0% )

There are no unpatched Secunia advisories affecting this product, when all vendor patches are applied..

-----

B.) For SPEED (& Opera leads again there, & CONSISTENTLY + for the LONGEST TIME, yes, even in javascript for the LONGEST time, until FF's new engines took its place TEMPRARILY (until Opera 10.50 @ least, because that's gotten a decent "boost" in that area -> http://tech.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=09/12/22/1911216 (not that it matters though, speeding up javascript is like asking to get infected by malscripted sites &/or adbanners faster imo @ least - that of a "POV" of PC security, mostly)):

2.) SunSpider tests done here recently -> http://www.pcpro.co.uk/gallery/features/356350/on-test-the-hidden-seven-browsers-in-the-windows-ballot/145087 WHERE OPERA REGAINS ITS JAVASCRIPT PROCESSING SPEED LEAD OVER FF YET AGAIN!

OLDER DATA (on performance alone):

3.) And this one too last year also -> http://crave.cnet.co.uk/software/0,39029471,49302491,00.htm [cnet.co.uk]

4.) AND IT HAS BEEN "BLOWING AWAY" FIREFOX IN HTML PARSING/PROCESSING SPEEDS AS WELL, & FOR YEARS NOW, per this test years ago -> http://www.howtocreate.co.uk/browserSpeed.html#win [howtocreate.co.uk]

5.) Same here -> http://nontroppo.org/timer/kestrel_tests/ [nontroppo.org]

6.) Yet again/once more? Same story ->

"All I have asked for is an article, submitted to Slashdot, on which we can topically discuss the slowness or quickness of Opera and Firefox. Currently, you are posting off-topic in an article about security." - by clone53421 (1310749) on Thursday March 25, @12:35PM (#31612642)

So, that "all said & aside", well - we have Yet more "icing on the cake" (per valid test evidences from respected websites of BOTH Opera's superior SPEED & SECURITY ONLINE for all things "web") as of yesteday no less, read on, because my data on BOTH SPEED & SECURITY? Are current, valid, & from respectable enough sources! Read on, because yet more security & speed data is present below, by the truckload (an avalanche that backs my words, that YOU CANNOT HANDLE):

====

CURRENT DATA:

A.) For SECURITY (& Opera leads there for the LONGEST TIME, yes, even in least security vulnerabilities found over time, typically of the "big 3" webbrowsers)):

1.) iPhone, IE, Firefox, Safari get stomped at hacker contest -> (No Opera noted as "hosed" though, lol) http://www.theregister.co.uk/2010/03/25/pwn2own_2010_day_one/

B.) For SPEED (& Opera leads again there, & CONSISTENTLY + for the LONGEST TIME, yes, even in javascript for the LONGEST time, until FF's new engines took its place TEMPRARILY (until Opera 10.50 @ least, because that's gotten a decent "boost" in that area -> http://tech.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=09/12/22/1911216 (not that it matters though, speeding up javascript is like asking to get infected by malscripted sites &/or adbanners faster imo @ least - that of a "POV" of PC security, mostly)):

----

"LOL OWNED, go troll someone else." - by clone53421 (1310749) on Thursday March 25, @12:35PM (#31612642)

LOL, wtf? Are you BLIND, ILLITERATE, SKIMMING (or just trolling)?

This is CURRENT VALID SPEED DATA:

See next below, tons of it (present & past, + CONSISTENT):

2.) SunSpider tests done here recently -> http://www.pcpro.co.uk/gallery/features/356350/on-test-the-hidden-seven-browsers-in-the-windows-ballot/145087 WHERE OPERA REGAINS ITS JAVASCRIPT PROCESSING SPEED LEAD OVER FF YET AGAIN!

AND, for SECURITY also (less vulnerabilities present over time than IE or FF, per SECUNIA.COM stats):

----

OPERA 10.x VULNERABILITIES STATS:(01/21/2010)

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/26745/?task=statistics

(UNPATCHED = 0% )

There are no unpatched Secunia advisories affecting this product, when all vendor patches are applied..

-----

OLDER DATA (on performance alone):

3.) And this one too last year also -> http://crave.cnet.co.uk/software/0,39029471,49302491,00.htm [cnet.co.uk]

4.) AND IT HAS BEEN "BLOWING AWAY" FIREFOX IN HTML PARSING/PROCESSING SPEEDS AS WELL, & FOR YEARS NOW, per this test years ago -> http://www.howtocreate.co.uk/browserSpeed.html#win [howtocreate.co.uk]

5.) Same here -> http://nontroppo.org/timer/kestrel_tests/ [nontroppo.org]

6.) Yet again/once more? Same story -> http://tech.slashdot.org/story/09/08/08/1750241/Opera-Dominates-CNET-Survey-of-Underdog-Web-Browsers [slashdot.org]

====

AND, WHAT DOES A "HACKER/CRACKER"-SECURITY RESEARCHER TYPE CURRENT

Per my subject-line above, well "mod me down" all you like but... facts? ARE FACTS!

So, that "all said & aside", well - we have Yet more "icing on the cake" (per valid test evidences from respected websites of BOTH Opera's superior SPEED & SECURITY ONLINE for all things "web"):

====

CURRENT DATA, AS OF TODAY, as to why Opera's superior in security too (from the mouth of a hacker/cracker-security tester no less):

A.) For SECURITY (& Opera leads there for the LONGEST TIME, yes, even in least security vulnerabilities found over time, typically of the "big 3" webbrowsers)):

1.) iPhone, IE, Firefox, Safari get stomped at hacker contest -> (No Opera noted as "hosed" though, lol) http://www.theregister.co.uk/2010/03/25/pwn2own_2010_day_one/

AND, WHAT DOES A "HACKER/CRACKER"-SECURITY RESEARCHER TYPE CURRENTLY SAY, ABOUT OPERA (per Opera's showing in #1 above (which is, literally, "hot-off-the-press", from yesterday's news no less))?

OK:

----

http://www.theregister.co.uk/2010/03/25/pwn2own_2010_day_one/

"The problem Microsoft has is they have a big market share, said Vreugdenhil, the hacker who attacked IE. "I use Opera, but that's basically because it has a tiny market share and as far as I know, nobody is really interested in creating a drive-by download for opera. The web at the moment is pretty scary, actually."

----

Hence, again showing that even the "hacker/cracker" types use Opera, because it's safer to do so, & from the mindset of those DOING THE HACKING/CRACKING no less!

====

B.) For SPEED (& Opera leads again there, & CONSISTENTLY + for the LONGEST TIME, yes, even in javascript for the LONGEST time, until FF's new engines took its place TEMPRARILY (until Opera 10.50 @ least, because that's gotten a decent "boost" in that area -> http://tech.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=09/12/22/1911216 (not that it matters though, speeding up javascript is like asking to get infected by malscripted sites &/or adbanners faster imo @ least - that of a "POV" of PC security, mostly)):

2.) SunSpider tests done here recently -> http://www.pcpro.co.uk/gallery/features/356350/on-test-the-hidden-seven-browsers-in-the-windows-ballot/145087 WHERE OPERA REGAINS ITS JAVASCRIPT PROCESSING SPEED LEAD OVER FF YET AGAIN!

AND, for SECURITY also (less vulnerabilities present over time than IE or FF, per SECUNIA.COM stats):

----

OPERA 10.x VULNERABILITIES STATS:(01/21/2010)

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/26745/?task=statistics

(UNPATCHED = 0% )

There are no unpatched Secunia advisories affecting this product, when all vendor patches are applied..

-----

OLDER DATA (on performance alone):

3.) And this one too last year also -> http://crave.cnet.co.uk/software/0,39029471,49302491,00.htm [cnet.co.uk]

4.) AND IT HAS BEEN "BLOWING AWAY" FIREFOX IN HTML PARSING/PROCESSING SPEEDS AS WELL, & FOR YEARS NOW, per this test years ago -> http://www.howtocreate.co.uk/browserSpeed.html#win [howtocreate.co.uk]

5.) Same here -> http://nontroppo.org/timer/kestrel_tests/ [nontroppo.org]

6.) Yet again/once more? Same story -> http://tech.slashdot.org/story/09/0

"Still the avoidance, still the denial." - by clone53421 (1310749) on Thursday March 25, @09:36AM (#31609728)

Clone, please: ALL I HAVE ASKED OF YOU IS TO SHOW US THAT OPERA IS SLOWER THAN FIREFOX & WITH MORE CURRENT DATA THAN I PROVIDE BELOW (you avoid this, to no end, because there is NO SUCH DATA, lol)... give us a break. You have turned into a SERIOUS disappointment that cannot let go, or admit when he cannot disprove something.

Per my subject-line above, well "mod me down" etc./et al, & all you like but... facts? ARE FACTS!

So, that "all said & aside", well - we have Yet more "icing on the cake" (per valid test evidences from respected websites of BOTH Opera's superior SPEED & SECURITY ONLINE for all things "web"):

====

CURRENT DATA:

A.) For SECURITY (& Opera leads there for the LONGEST TIME, yes, even in least security vulnerabilities found over time, typically of the "big 3" webbrowsers)):

1.) iPhone, IE, Firefox, Safari get stomped at hacker contest -> (No Opera noted as "hosed" though, lol) http://www.theregister.co.uk/2010/03/25/pwn2own_2010_day_one/

B.) For SPEED (& Opera leads again there, & CONSISTENTLY + for the LONGEST TIME, yes, even in javascript for the LONGEST time, until FF's new engines took its place TEMPRARILY (until Opera 10.50 @ least, because that's gotten a decent "boost" in that area -> http://tech.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=09/12/22/1911216 (not that it matters though, speeding up javascript is like asking to get infected by malscripted sites &/or adbanners faster imo @ least - that of a "POV" of PC security, mostly)):

2.) SunSpider tests done here recently -> http://www.pcpro.co.uk/gallery/features/356350/on-test-the-hidden-seven-browsers-in-the-windows-ballot/145087 WHERE OPERA REGAINS ITS JAVASCRIPT PROCESSING SPEED LEAD OVER FF YET AGAIN!

AND, for SECURITY also (less vulnerabilities present over time than IE or FF, per SECUNIA.COM stats):

----

OPERA 10.x VULNERABILITIES STATS:(01/21/2010)

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/26745/?task=statistics

(UNPATCHED = 0% )

There are no unpatched Secunia advisories affecting this product, when all vendor patches are applied..

-----

OLDER DATA (on performance alone):

3.) And this one too last year also -> http://crave.cnet.co.uk/software/0,39029471,49302491,00.htm [cnet.co.uk]

4.) AND IT HAS BEEN "BLOWING AWAY" FIREFOX IN HTML PARSING/PROCESSING SPEEDS AS WELL, & FOR YEARS NOW, per this test years ago -> http://www.howtocreate.co.uk/browserSpeed.html#win [howtocreate.co.uk]

5.) Same here -> http://nontroppo.org/timer/kestrel_tests/ [nontroppo.org]

6.) Yet again/once more? Same story -> http://tech.slashdot.org/story/09/08/08/1750241/Opera-Dominates-CNET-Survey-of-Underdog-Web-Browsers [slashdot.org]

====

AND, WHAT DOES A "HACKER/CRACKER"-SECURITY RESEARCHER TYPE CURRENTLY SAY, ABOUT OPERA (per Opera's showing in #1 above (which is, literally, "hot-off-the-press", from yesterday's news no less))?

OK:

----

http://www.theregister.co.uk/2010/03/25/pwn2own_2010_day_one/

"The problem Microsoft has is th

Per my subject-line above, see below... facts? ARE FACTS!

So, that "all said & aside", well - we have Yet more "icing on the cake" (per valid test evidences from respected websites of BOTH Opera's superior SPEED & SECURITY ONLINE for all things "web"):

====

CURRENT DATA:

A.) For SECURITY (& Opera leads there for the LONGEST TIME, yes, even in least security vulnerabilities found over time, typically of the "big 3" webbrowsers):

1.) iPhone, IE, Firefox, Safari get stomped at hacker contest -> (No Opera noted as "hosed" though, lol) http://www.theregister.co.uk/2010/03/25/pwn2own_2010_day_one/

B.) For SPEED (& Opera leads again there, & CONSISTENTLY + for the LONGEST TIME, yes, even in javascript for the LONGEST time, until FF's new engines took its place TEMPRARILY (until Opera 10.50 @ least, because that's gotten a decent "boost" in that area -> http://tech.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=09/12/22/1911216 (not that it matters though, speeding up javascript is like asking to get infected by malscripted sites &/or adbanners faster imo @ least - that of a "POV" of PC security, mostly)):

2.) SunSpider tests done here recently -> http://www.pcpro.co.uk/gallery/features/356350/on-test-the-hidden-seven-browsers-in-the-windows-ballot/145087 WHERE OPERA REGAINS ITS JAVASCRIPT PROCESSING SPEED LEAD OVER FF YET AGAIN!

AND, for SECURITY also (less vulnerabilities present over time than IE or FF, per SECUNIA.COM stats):

----

OPERA 10.x VULNERABILITIES STATS:(01/21/2010)

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/26745/?task=statistics

(UNPATCHED = 0% )

There are no unpatched Secunia advisories affecting this product, when all vendor patches are applied..

-----

OLDER DATA (on performance alone):

3.) And this one too last year also -> http://crave.cnet.co.uk/software/0,39029471,49302491,00.htm [cnet.co.uk]

4.) AND IT HAS BEEN "BLOWING AWAY" FIREFOX IN HTML PARSING/PROCESSING SPEEDS AS WELL, & FOR YEARS NOW, per this test years ago -> http://www.howtocreate.co.uk/browserSpeed.html#win [howtocreate.co.uk]

5.) Same here -> http://nontroppo.org/timer/kestrel_tests/ [nontroppo.org]

6.) Yet again/once more? Same story -> http://tech.slashdot.org/story/09/08/08/1750241/Opera-Dominates-CNET-Survey-of-Underdog-Web-Browsers [slashdot.org]

====

AND, WHAT DOES A "HACKER/CRACKER"-SECURITY RESEARCHER TYPE CURRENTLY SAY, ABOUT OPERA (per Opera's showing in #1 above (which is, literally, "hot-off-the-press", from yesterday's news no less))?

OK:

----

http://www.theregister.co.uk/2010/03/25/pwn2own_2010_day_one/

"The problem Microsoft has is they have a big market share, said Vreugdenhil, the hacker who attacked IE. "I use Opera, but that's basically because it has a tiny market share and as far as I know, nobody is really interested in creating a drive-by download for opera. The web at the moment is pretty scary, actually."

----

Hence, again showing that even the "hacker/cracker" types use Opera, because it's safer to do so, & from the mindset of those DOING THE HACKING/CRACKING no less!

(Opera "rocked the planet" in those cases... bi

Per my subject-line above, see below... facts? ARE FACTS!

So, that "all said & aside", well - we have yet more "icing on the cake" (per valid test evidences from respected websites of BOTH Opera's superior SPEED & SECURITY ONLINE for all things "web"):

====

CURRENT DATA:

A.) For SECURITY (& Opera leads there for the LONGEST TIME, yes, even in least security vulnerabilities found over time, typically of the "big 3" webbrowsers)):

1.) iPhone, IE, Firefox, Safari get stomped at hacker contest -> (No Opera noted as "hosed" though, lol) http://www.theregister.co.uk/2010/03/25/pwn2own_2010_day_one/

B.) For SPEED (& Opera leads again there, & CONSISTENTLY + for the LONGEST TIME, yes, even in javascript for the LONGEST time, until FF's new engines took its place TEMPRARILY (until Opera 10.50 @ least, because that's gotten a decent "boost" in that area -> http://tech.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=09/12/22/1911216 (not that it matters though, speeding up javascript is like asking to get infected by malscripted sites &/or adbanners faster imo @ least - that of a "POV" of PC security, mostly)):

2.) SunSpider tests done here recently -> http://www.pcpro.co.uk/gallery/features/356350/on-test-the-hidden-seven-browsers-in-the-windows-ballot/145087 WHERE OPERA REGAINS ITS JAVASCRIPT PROCESSING SPEED LEAD OVER FF YET AGAIN!

AND, for SECURITY also (less vulnerabilities present over time than IE or FF, per SECUNIA.COM stats):

----

OPERA 10.x VULNERABILITIES STATS:(01/21/2010)

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/26745/?task=statistics

(UNPATCHED = 0% )

There are no unpatched Secunia advisories affecting this product, when all vendor patches are applied..

-----

OLDER DATA (on performance alone):

3.) And this one too last year also -> http://crave.cnet.co.uk/software/0,39029471,49302491,00.htm [cnet.co.uk]

4.) AND IT HAS BEEN "BLOWING AWAY" FIREFOX IN HTML PARSING/PROCESSING SPEEDS AS WELL, & FOR YEARS NOW, per this test years ago -> http://www.howtocreate.co.uk/browserSpeed.html#win [howtocreate.co.uk]

5.) Same here -> http://nontroppo.org/timer/kestrel_tests/ [nontroppo.org]

6.) Yet again/once more? Same story -> http://tech.slashdot.org/story/09/08/08/1750241/Opera-Dominates-CNET-Survey-of-Underdog-Web-Browsers [slashdot.org]

====

AND, WHAT DOES A "HACKER/CRACKER"-SECURITY RESEARCHER TYPE CURRENTLY SAY, ABOUT OPERA (per Opera's showing in #1 above (which is, literally, "hot-off-the-press", from yesterday's news no less))?

OK:

----

http://www.theregister.co.uk/2010/03/25/pwn2own_2010_day_one/

"The problem Microsoft has is they have a big market share, said Vreugdenhil, the hacker who attacked IE. "I use Opera, but that's basically because it has a tiny market share and as far as I know, nobody is really interested in creating a drive-by download for opera. The web at the moment is pretty scary, actually."

----

Hence, again showing that even the "hacker/cracker" types use Opera, because it's safer to do so, & from the mindset of those DOING THE HACKING/CRACKING no less!

(Opera "rocked the planet" in those cases... bigtime

Per my subject-line above, well "mod me down" all you like but... facts? ARE FACTS!

So, that "all said & aside", well - we have Yet more "icing on the cake" (per valid test evidences from respected websites of BOTH Opera's superior SPEED & SECURITY ONLINE for all things "web"):

====

CURRENT DATA:

A.) For SECURITY (& Opera leads there for the LONGEST TIME, yes, even in least security vulnerabilities found over time, typically of the "big 3" webbrowsers)):

1.) iPhone, IE, Firefox, Safari get stomped at hacker contest -> (No Opera noted as "hosed" though, lol) http://www.theregister.co.uk/2010/03/25/pwn2own_2010_day_one/

B.) For SPEED (& Opera leads again there, & CONSISTENTLY + for the LONGEST TIME, yes, even in javascript for the LONGEST time, until FF's new engines took its place TEMPRARILY (until Opera 10.50 @ least, because that's gotten a decent "boost" in that area -> http://tech.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=09/12/22/1911216 (not that it matters though, speeding up javascript is like asking to get infected by malscripted sites &/or adbanners faster imo @ least - that of a "POV" of PC security, mostly)):

2.) SunSpider tests done here recently -> http://www.pcpro.co.uk/gallery/features/356350/on-test-the-hidden-seven-browsers-in-the-windows-ballot/145087 WHERE OPERA REGAINS ITS JAVASCRIPT PROCESSING SPEED LEAD OVER FF YET AGAIN!

AND, for SECURITY also (less vulnerabilities present over time than IE or FF, per SECUNIA.COM stats):

----

OPERA 10.x VULNERABILITIES STATS:(01/21/2010)

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/26745/?task=statistics

(UNPATCHED = 0% )

There are no unpatched Secunia advisories affecting this product, when all vendor patches are applied..

-----

OLDER DATA (on performance alone):

3.) And this one too last year also -> http://crave.cnet.co.uk/software/0,39029471,49302491,00.htm [cnet.co.uk]

4.) AND IT HAS BEEN "BLOWING AWAY" FIREFOX IN HTML PARSING/PROCESSING SPEEDS AS WELL, & FOR YEARS NOW, per this test years ago -> http://www.howtocreate.co.uk/browserSpeed.html#win [howtocreate.co.uk]

5.) Same here -> http://nontroppo.org/timer/kestrel_tests/ [nontroppo.org]

6.) Yet again/once more? Same story -> http://tech.slashdot.org/story/09/08/08/1750241/Opera-Dominates-CNET-Survey-of-Underdog-Web-Browsers [slashdot.org]

====

AND, WHAT DOES A "HACKER/CRACKER"-SECURITY RESEARCHER TYPE CURRENTLY SAY, ABOUT OPERA (per Opera's showing in #1 above (which is, literally, "hot-off-the-press", from yesterday's news no less))?

OK:

----

http://www.theregister.co.uk/2010/03/25/pwn2own_2010_day_one/

"The problem Microsoft has is they have a big market share, said Vreugdenhil, the hacker who attacked IE. "I use Opera, but that's basically because it has a tiny market share and as far as I know, nobody is really interested in creating a drive-by download for opera. The web at the moment is pretty scary, actually."

----

Hence, again showing that even the "hacker/cracker" types use Opera, because it's safer to do so, & from the mindset of those DOING THE HACKING/CRACKING no less!

(Opera "rocked the planet"

Per my subject-line above, well "mod me down" all you like but... facts? ARE FACTS!

So, that "all said & aside", well - we have Yet more "icing on the cake" (per valid test evidences from respected websites of BOTH Opera's superior SPEED & SECURITY ONLINE for all things "web"):

====

CURRENT DATA:

A.) For SECURITY (& Opera leads there for the LONGEST TIME, yes, even in least security vulnerabilities found over time, typically of the "big 3" webbrowsers)):

1.) iPhone, IE, Firefox, Safari get stomped at hacker contest -> (No Opera noted as "hosed" though, lol) http://www.theregister.co.uk/2010/03/25/pwn2own_2010_day_one/

B.) For SPEED (& Opera leads again there, & CONSISTENTLY + for the LONGEST TIME, yes, even in javascript for the LONGEST time, until FF's new engines took its place TEMPRARILY (until Opera 10.50 @ least, because that's gotten a decent "boost" in that area -> http://tech.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=09/12/22/1911216 (not that it matters though, speeding up javascript is like asking to get infected by malscripted sites &/or adbanners faster imo @ least - that of a "POV" of PC security, mostly)):

2.) SunSpider tests done here recently -> http://www.pcpro.co.uk/gallery/features/356350/on-test-the-hidden-seven-browsers-in-the-windows-ballot/145087 WHERE OPERA REGAINS ITS JAVASCRIPT PROCESSING SPEED LEAD OVER FF YET AGAIN!

AND, for SECURITY also (less vulnerabilities present over time than IE or FF, per SECUNIA.COM stats):

----

OPERA 10.x VULNERABILITIES STATS:(01/21/2010)

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/26745/?task=statistics

(UNPATCHED = 0% )

There are no unpatched Secunia advisories affecting this product, when all vendor patches are applied..

-----

OLDER DATA (on performance alone):

3.) And this one too last year also -> http://crave.cnet.co.uk/software/0,39029471,49302491,00.htm [cnet.co.uk]

4.) AND IT HAS BEEN "BLOWING AWAY" FIREFOX IN HTML PARSING/PROCESSING SPEEDS AS WELL, & FOR YEARS NOW, per this test years ago -> http://www.howtocreate.co.uk/browserSpeed.html#win [howtocreate.co.uk]

5.) Same here -> http://nontroppo.org/timer/kestrel_tests/ [nontroppo.org]

6.) Yet again/once more? Same story -> http://tech.slashdot.org/story/09/08/08/1750241/Opera-Dominates-CNET-Survey-of-Underdog-Web-Browsers [slashdot.org]

====

AND, WHAT DOES A "HACKER/CRACKER"-SECURITY RESEARCHER TYPE CURRENTLY SAY, ABOUT OPERA (per Opera's showing in #1 above (which is, literally, "hot-off-the-press", from yesterday's news no less))?

OK:

----

http://www.theregister.co.uk/2010/03/25/pwn2own_2010_day_one/

"The problem Microsoft has is they have a big market share, said Vreugdenhil, the hacker who attacked IE. "I use Opera, but that's basically because it has a tiny market share and as far as I know, nobody is really interested in creating a drive-by download for opera. The web at the moment is pretty scary, actually."

----

Hence, again showing that even the "hacker/cracker" types use Opera, because it's safer to do so, & from the mindset of those DOING THE HACKING/CRACKING no less!

(Opera "rocked the planet"

Per my subject-line above, well "mod me down" all you like but... facts? ARE FACTS!

So, that "all said & aside", well - we have Yet more "icing on the cake" (per valid test evidences from respected websites of BOTH Opera's superior SPEED & SECURITY ONLINE for all things "web"):

====

CURRENT DATA:

A.) For SECURITY (& Opera leads there for the LONGEST TIME, yes, even in least security vulnerabilities found over time, typically of the "big 3" webbrowsers)):

1.) iPhone, IE, Firefox, Safari get stomped at hacker contest -> (No Opera noted as "hosed" though, lol) http://www.theregister.co.uk/2010/03/25/pwn2own_2010_day_one/

B.) For SPEED (& Opera leads again there, & CONSISTENTLY + for the LONGEST TIME, yes, even in javascript for the LONGEST time, until FF's new engines took its place TEMPRARILY (until Opera 10.50 @ least, because that's gotten a decent "boost" in that area -> http://tech.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=09/12/22/1911216 (not that it matters though, speeding up javascript is like asking to get infected by malscripted sites &/or adbanners faster imo @ least - that of a "POV" of PC security, mostly)):

2.) SunSpider tests done here recently -> http://www.pcpro.co.uk/gallery/features/356350/on-test-the-hidden-seven-browsers-in-the-windows-ballot/145087 WHERE OPERA REGAINS ITS JAVASCRIPT PROCESSING SPEED LEAD OVER FF YET AGAIN!

AND, for SECURITY also (less vulnerabilities present over time than IE or FF, per SECUNIA.COM stats):

----

OPERA 10.x VULNERABILITIES STATS:(01/21/2010)

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/26745/?task=statistics

(UNPATCHED = 0% )

There are no unpatched Secunia advisories affecting this product, when all vendor patches are applied..

-----

OLDER DATA (on performance alone):

3.) And this one too last year also -> http://crave.cnet.co.uk/software/0,39029471,49302491,00.htm [cnet.co.uk]

4.) AND IT HAS BEEN "BLOWING AWAY" FIREFOX IN HTML PARSING/PROCESSING SPEEDS AS WELL, & FOR YEARS NOW, per this test years ago -> http://www.howtocreate.co.uk/browserSpeed.html#win [howtocreate.co.uk]

5.) Same here -> http://nontroppo.org/timer/kestrel_tests/ [nontroppo.org]

6.) Yet again/once more? Same story -> http://tech.slashdot.org/story/09/08/08/1750241/Opera-Dominates-CNET-Survey-of-Underdog-Web-Browsers [slashdot.org]

====

AND, WHAT DOES A "HACKER/CRACKER"-SECURITY RESEARCHER TYPE CURRENTLY SAY, ABOUT OPERA (per Opera's showing in #1 above (which is, literally, "hot-off-the-press", from yesterday's news no less))?

OK:

----

http://www.theregister.co.uk/2010/03/25/pwn2own_2010_day_one/

"The problem Microsoft has is they have a big market share, said Vreugdenhil, the hacker who attacked IE. "I use Opera, but that's basically because it has a tiny market share and as far as I know, nobody is really interested in creating a drive-by download for opera. The web at the moment is pretty scary, actually."

----

Hence, again showing that even the "hacker/cracker" types use Opera, because it's safer to do so, & from the mindset of those DOING THE HACKING/CRACKING no less!

(Opera "rocked the planet"

Per my subject-line above, well "mod me down" all you like but... facts? ARE FACTS!

So, that "all said & aside", well - we have Yet more "icing on the cake" (per valid test evidences from respected websites of BOTH Opera's superior SPEED & SECURITY ONLINE for all things "web"):

====

CURRENT DATA:

A.) For SECURITY (& Opera leads there for the LONGEST TIME, yes, even in least security vulnerabilities found over time, typically of the "big 3" webbrowsers)):

1.) iPhone, IE, Firefox, Safari get stomped at hacker contest -> (No Opera noted as "hosed" though, lol) http://www.theregister.co.uk/2010/03/25/pwn2own_2010_day_one/

B.) For SPEED (& Opera leads again there, & CONSISTENTLY + for the LONGEST TIME, yes, even in javascript for the LONGEST time, until FF's new engines took its place TEMPRARILY (until Opera 10.50 @ least, because that's gotten a decent "boost" in that area -> http://tech.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=09/12/22/1911216 (not that it matters though, speeding up javascript is like asking to get infected by malscripted sites &/or adbanners faster imo @ least - that of a "POV" of PC security, mostly)):

2.) SunSpider tests done here recently -> http://www.pcpro.co.uk/gallery/features/356350/on-test-the-hidden-seven-browsers-in-the-windows-ballot/145087 WHERE OPERA REGAINS ITS JAVASCRIPT PROCESSING SPEED LEAD OVER FF YET AGAIN!

AND, for SECURITY also (less vulnerabilities present over time than IE or FF, per SECUNIA.COM stats):

----

OPERA 10.x VULNERABILITIES STATS:(01/21/2010)

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/26745/?task=statistics

(UNPATCHED = 0% )

There are no unpatched Secunia advisories affecting this product, when all vendor patches are applied..

-----

OLDER DATA (on performance alone):

3.) And this one too last year also -> http://crave.cnet.co.uk/software/0,39029471,49302491,00.htm [cnet.co.uk]

4.) AND IT HAS BEEN "BLOWING AWAY" FIREFOX IN HTML PARSING/PROCESSING SPEEDS AS WELL, & FOR YEARS NOW, per this test years ago -> http://www.howtocreate.co.uk/browserSpeed.html#win [howtocreate.co.uk]

5.) Same here -> http://nontroppo.org/timer/kestrel_tests/ [nontroppo.org]

6.) Yet again/once more? Same story -> http://tech.slashdot.org/story/09/08/08/1750241/Opera-Dominates-CNET-Survey-of-Underdog-Web-Browsers [slashdot.org]

====

AND, WHAT DOES A "HACKER/CRACKER"-SECURITY RESEARCHER TYPE CURRENTLY SAY, ABOUT OPERA (per Opera's showing in #1 above (which is, literally, "hot-off-the-press", from yesterday's news no less))?

OK:

----

http://www.theregister.co.uk/2010/03/25/pwn2own_2010_day_one/

"The problem Microsoft has is they have a big market share, said Vreugdenhil, the hacker who attacked IE. "I use Opera, but that's basically because it has a tiny market share and as far as I know, nobody is really interested in creating a drive-by download for opera. The web at the moment is pretty scary, actually."

----

Hence, again showing that even the "hacker/cracker" types use Opera, because it's safer to do so, & from the mindset of those DOING THE HACKING/CRACKING no less!

(Opera "rocked the planet"

Per my subject-line above, well "mod me down" all you like but... facts? ARE FACTS!

So, that "all said & aside", well - we have Yet more "icing on the cake" (per valid test evidences from respected websites of BOTH Opera's superior SPEED & SECURITY ONLINE for all things "web"):

====

CURRENT DATA:

A.) For SECURITY (& Opera led there for the LONGEST TIME, yes, even in least security vulnerabilities found over time, typically of the "big 3" webbrowsers)):

1.) iPhone, IE, Firefox, Safari get stomped at hacker contest -> (No Opera noted though) http://www.theregister.co.uk/2010/03/25/pwn2own_2010_day_one/

B.) For SPEED (& Opera leads again there, & CONSISTENTLY + for the LONGEST TIME, yes, even in javascript for the LONGEST time, until FF's new engines took its place TEMPRARILY (until Opera 10.50 @ least, because that's gotten a decent "boost" in that area -> http://tech.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=09/12/22/1911216 (not that it matters though, speeding up javascript is like asking to get infected by malscripted sites &/or adbanners faster imo @ least - that of a "POV" of PC security, mostly)):

2.) SunSpider tests done here recently -> http://www.pcpro.co.uk/gallery/features/356350/on-test-the-hidden-seven-browsers-in-the-windows-ballot/145087 WHERE OPERA REGAINS ITS JAVASCRIPT PROCESSING SPEED LEAD OVER FF YET AGAIN!

AND, for SECURITY also (less vulnerabilities present over time than IE or FF, per SECUNIA.COM stats):

----

OPERA 10.x VULNERABILITIES STATS:(01/21/2010)

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/26745/?task=statistics

(UNPATCHED = 0% )

There are no unpatched Secunia advisories affecting this product, when all vendor patches are applied..

-----

OLDER DATA (on performance alone):

3.) And this one too last year also -> http://crave.cnet.co.uk/software/0,39029471,49302491,00.htm [cnet.co.uk]

4.) AND IT HAS BEEN "BLOWING AWAY" FIREFOX IN HTML PARSING/PROCESSING SPEEDS AS WELL, & FOR YEARS NOW, per this test years ago -> http://www.howtocreate.co.uk/browserSpeed.html#win [howtocreate.co.uk]

5.) Same here -> http://nontroppo.org/timer/kestrel_tests/ [nontroppo.org]

6.) Yet again/once more? Same story -> http://tech.slashdot.org/story/09/08/08/1750241/Opera-Dominates-CNET-Survey-of-Underdog-Web-Browsers [slashdot.org]

====

AND, WHAT DOES A "HACKER/CRACKER"-SECURITY RESEARCHER TYPE CURRENTLY SAY, ABOUT OPERA (per Opera's showing in #1 above (which is, literally, "hot-off-the-press", from yesterday's news no less))?

OK:

----

"The problem Microsoft has is they have a big market share, said Vreugdenhil, the hacker who attacked IE. "I use Opera, but that's basically because it has a tiny market share and as far as I know, nobody is really interested in creating a drive-by download for opera. The web at the moment is pretty scary, actually."

----

Hence, again showing that even the "hacker/cracker" types use Opera, because it's safer to do so, & from the mindset of those DOING THE HACKING/CRACKING no less!

(Opera "rocked the planet" in those cases... bigtime (& ESPECIALLY ON THE MOST USED PLATFORM THERE IS, BAR-NONE, FOR PC-COMPUTING: Windows!))

People, face it - MOD ME DOWN, ALL YO

Agreed. The press release states that Secuina "...announced that their renowned authenticated internal vulnerability scanner ... has been integrated with ... WSUS..."

Is this third party patch management or just a vulnerability scanner built in to WSUS?

Scanning is neat, but it would be one hell of a lot nicer if I could make sure Flash & Java are updated as easily as the latest Windows updates.

I use PSI (Personal Software Inspector) http://secunia.com/vulnerability_scanning/personal/ \

Yes, but there is this little detail, which, if you had read http://secunia.com/advisories/38608, you would know. It was not clear that this was a real bug, there were no details known. A fairly unknown researcher claimed there was a zero day in firefox, without giving enough details to tell where the bug is.

Gee, I bet you don't stand up for Microsoft or Apple when "it was not clear that this was a real bug, there were no details known".

See subject-line above & also, note this report from SECUNIA:

----

Vulnerability Report: Opera 10.x:

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/26745/

Unpatched 0% (0 of 5 Secunia advisories)

So when the parent asks for "software that was correctly written and had no exploits to begin with", you provide one that has had 9 vulnerabilities as noted in 5 reports, 60% of which are classified as highly critical with the rest as moderately critical. Excellent work.

Don't get me wrong - Opera is a fine browser and definitely worth consideration. But it hardly meets the criteria.

See subject-line above - & also, note this report from SECUNIA:

----

Vulnerability Report: Opera 10.x:

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/26745/

Unpatched 0% (0 of 5 Secunia advisories)

----

Download Opera 10.51 FINAL RELEASE, here:

http://my.opera.com/desktopteam/blog/

----

OPERA ALSO SURPASSES FIREFOX IN BROWSING SPEED, at BOTH the javascript processing & HTML processing/parsing speeds levels as well, consistently & for years, no less!

Per latest:

1.) SunSpider tests done here recently -> http://www.pcpro.co.uk/gallery/features/356350/on-test-the-hidden-seven-browsers-in-the-windows-ballot/145087

2.) AND OPERA HAS BEEN "BLOWING AWAY" FIREFOX & IE, by far, N HTML PARSING/PROCESSING SPEEDS AS WELL, & FOR YEARS NOW, per this test years ago -> http://www.howtocreate.co.uk/browserSpeed.html#win and this one too last year also -> http://crave.cnet.co.uk/software/0,39029471,49302491,00.htm

("Beat that with a stick"... as the saying goes!)

APK

P.S.=> Nicest part about Opera is that it originates a LOT of what folks consider cool, as far as browser features, & first (e,g, - tabbed browsing anyone), & it contains features you cannot get in FireFox & IE natively (i.e - without addons (such as site by site choices of whether to run javascript on a website, or not (javascript IS what gets you people all "hit" by these online attacks, 9/10 times (literally, it's the "main delivery mechanism" of MOST online attacks, & sites like SECUNIA.COM or SECURITYFOCUS.COM can show anybody that much, easily))))... apk

See subject-line above - & also, note this report from SECUNIA:

----

Vulnerability Report: Opera 10.x:

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/26745/

Unpatched 0% (0 of 5 Secunia advisories)

----

Download Opera 10.51 FINAL RELEASE, here:

http://my.opera.com/desktopteam/blog/

----

OPERA ALSO SURPASSES FIREFOX IN BROWSING SPEED, at BOTH the javascript processing & HTML processing/parsing speeds levels as well, consistently & for years, no less!

Per latest:

1.) SunSpider tests done here recently -> http://www.pcpro.co.uk/gallery/features/356350/on-test-the-hidden-seven-browsers-in-the-windows-ballot/145087

2.) AND IT HAS BEEN "BLOWING AWAY" FIREFOX IN HTML PARSING/PROCESSING SPEEDS AS WELL, & FOR YEARS NOW, per this test years ago -> http://www.howtocreate.co.uk/browserSpeed.html#win and this one too last year also -> http://crave.cnet.co.uk/software/0,39029471,49302491,00.htm

("Beat that with a stick" - as the saying goes!)

APK

P.S.=> Nicest part about Opera is that it originates a LOT of what folks consider cool, as far as browser features, & first (e,g, - tabbed browsing anyone), & it contains features you cannot get in FireFox & IE natively (i.e - without addons (such as site by site choices of whether to run javascript on a website, or not (javascript IS what gets you people all "hit" by these online attacks, 9/10 times (literally, it's the "main delivery mechanism" of MOST online attacks, & sites like SECUNIA.COM or SECURITYFOCUS.COM can show anybody that much, easily))))... apk

See subject-line above - & also, note this report from SECUNIA:

----

Vulnerability Report: Opera 10.x:

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/26745/

Unpatched 0% (0 of 5 Secunia advisories)

----

Download Opera 10.51 FINAL RELEASE, here:

http://my.opera.com/desktopteam/blog/

----

OPERA ALSO SURPASSES FIREFOX IN BROWSING SPEED, at BOTH the javascript processing & HTML processing/parsing speeds levels as well, consistently & for years, no less!

Per these tests, & consistently, for years now no less:

1.) SunSpider tests done here recently -> http://www.pcpro.co.uk/gallery/features/356350/on-test-the-hidden-seven-browsers-in-the-windows-ballot/145087

2.) AND IT HAS BEEN "BLOWING AWAY" FIREFOX IN HTML PARSING/PROCESSING SPEEDS AS WELL, & FOR YEARS NOW, per this test years ago -> http://www.howtocreate.co.uk/browserSpeed.html#win and this one too last year also -> http://crave.cnet.co.uk/software/0,39029471,49302491,00.htm

("Beat that with a stick", as the saying goes!)

APK

P.S.=> Nicest part about Opera is that it originates a LOT of what folks consider cool, as far as browser features, & first (e,g, - tabbed browsing anyone), & it contains features you cannot get in FireFox & IE natively (i.e - without addons (such as site by site choices of whether to run javascript on a website, or not (javascript IS what gets you people all "hit" by these online attacks, 9/10 times (literally, it's the "main delivery mechanism" of MOST online attacks, & sites like SECUNIA.COM or SECURITYFOCUS.COM can show anybody that much, easily))))... apk

See subject-line above - & also, note this report from SECUNIA + benchmarks results which have favored Opera on ALL LEVELS for years (9/10 times):

----

Vulnerability Report: Opera 10.x:

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/26745/

Unpatched 0% (0 of 5 Secunia advisories)

----

Download Opera 10.51 FINAL RELEASE, here:

http://my.opera.com/desktopteam/blog/

----

OPERA ALSO SURPASSES FIREFOX IN BROWSING SPEED, at BOTH the javascript processing & HTML processing/parsing speeds levels as well, consistently & for years, no less!

Per latest:

1.) SunSpider tests done here recently -> http://www.pcpro.co.uk/gallery/features/356350/on-test-the-hidden-seven-browsers-in-the-windows-ballot/145087

2.) AND IT HAS BEEN "BLOWING AWAY" FIREFOX IN HTML PARSING/PROCESSING SPEEDS AS WELL, & FOR YEARS NOW, per this test years ago -> http://www.howtocreate.co.uk/browserSpeed.html#win and this one too last year also -> http://crave.cnet.co.uk/software/0,39029471,49302491,00.htm

("Beat that with a stick" as the saying goes!)

APK

P.S.=> Nicest part about Opera is that it originates a LOT of what folks consider cool, as far as browser features, & first (e,g, - tabbed browsing anyone), & it contains features you cannot get in FireFox & IE natively (i.e - without addons (such as site by site choices of whether to run javascript on a website, or not (javascript IS what gets you people all "hit" by these online attacks, 9/10 times (literally, it's the "main delivery mechanism" of MOST online attacks, & sites like SECUNIA.COM or SECURITYFOCUS.COM can show anybody that much, easily))))... apk

See subject-line above - & also, note this report from SECUNIA:

----

Vulnerability Report: Opera 10.x:

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/26745/

Unpatched 0% (0 of 5 Secunia advisories)

----

Download Opera 10.51 FINAL RELEASE, here:

http://my.opera.com/desktopteam/blog/

----

OPERA ALSO SURPASSES FIREFOX IN BROWSING SPEED, at BOTH the javascript processing & HTML processing/parsing speeds levels as well, consistently & for years, no less!

Per latest:

1.) SunSpider tests done here recently -> http://www.pcpro.co.uk/gallery/features/356350/on-test-the-hidden-seven-browsers-in-the-windows-ballot/145087

2.) AND IT HAS BEEN "BLOWING AWAY" FIREFOX IN HTML PARSING/PROCESSING SPEEDS AS WELL, & FOR YEARS NOW, per this test years ago -> http://www.howtocreate.co.uk/browserSpeed.html#win and this one too last year also -> http://crave.cnet.co.uk/software/0,39029471,49302491,00.htm

("Beat that with a stick", as the saying goes!)

APK

P.S.=> Nicest part about Opera is that it originates a LOT of what folks consider cool, as far as browser features, & first (e,g, - tabbed browsing anyone), & it contains features you cannot get in FireFox & IE natively (i.e - without addons (such as site by site choices of whether to run javascript on a website, or not (javascript IS what gets you people all "hit" by these online attacks, 9/10 times (literally, it's the "main delivery mechanism" of MOST online attacks, & sites like SECUNIA.COM or SECURITYFOCUS.COM can show anybody that much, easily))))... apk

See subject-line above & also, note this report from SECUNIA:

----

Vulnerability Report: Opera 10.x:

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/26745/

Unpatched 0% (0 of 5 Secunia advisories)

----

Download Opera 10.51 FINAL RELEASE, here:

http://my.opera.com/desktopteam/blog/

----

OPERA ALSO SURPASSES FIREFOX IN BROWSING SPEED, at BOTH the javascript processing & HTML processing/parsing speeds levels as well, consistently & for years, no less!

Per latest:

1.) SunSpider tests done here recently -> http://www.pcpro.co.uk/gallery/features/356350/on-test-the-hidden-seven-browsers-in-the-windows-ballot/145087

2.) AND IT HAS BEEN "BLOWING AWAY" FIREFOX IN HTML PARSING/PROCESSING SPEEDS AS WELL, & FOR YEARS NOW, per this test years ago -> http://www.howtocreate.co.uk/browserSpeed.html#win and this one too last year also -> http://crave.cnet.co.uk/software/0,39029471,49302491,00.htm

("Beat that with a stick", as the saying goes!)

APK

P.S.=> Nicest part about Opera is that it originates a LOT of what folks consider cool, as far as browser features, & first (e,g, - tabbed browsing anyone), & it contains features you cannot get in FireFox & IE natively (i.e - without addons (such as site by site choices of whether to run javascript on a website, or not (javascript IS what gets you people all "hit" by these online attacks, 9/10 times (literally, it's the "main delivery mechanism" of MOST online attacks, & sites like SECUNIA.COM or SECURITYFOCUS.COM can show anybody that much, easily)))... apk

See subject-line above, & also, note this report from SECUNIA:

----

Vulnerability Report: Opera 10.x:

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/26745/

Unpatched 0% (0 of 5 Secunia advisories)

----

Download Opera 10.51 FINAL RELEASE, here:

http://my.opera.com/desktopteam/blog/

----

OPERA ALSO SURPASSES FIREFOX IN BROWSING SPEED, at BOTH the javascript processing & HTML processing/parsing speeds levels as well, consistently & for years, no less!

Per latest:

1.) SunSpider tests done here recently -> http://www.pcpro.co.uk/gallery/features/356350/on-test-the-hidden-seven-browsers-in-the-windows-ballot/145087

2.) AND IT HAS BEEN "BLOWING AWAY" FIREFOX IN HTML PARSING/PROCESSING SPEEDS AS WELL, & FOR YEARS NOW, per this test years ago -> http://www.howtocreate.co.uk/browserSpeed.html#win and this one too last year also -> http://crave.cnet.co.uk/software/0,39029471,49302491,00.htm

("Beat that with a stick", as the saying goes!)

APK

P.S.=> Nicest part about Opera is that it originates a LOT of what folks consider cool, as far as browser features, & first (e,g, - tabbed browsing anyone), & it contains features you cannot get in FireFox & IE natively (i.e - without addons (such as site by site choices of whether to run javascript on a website, or not (javascript IS what gets you people all "hit" by these online attacks, & sites like SECUNIA.COM or SECURITYFOCUS.COM can show anybody that much, easily)))... apk

See subject-line above, & also note this report from SECUNIA:

----

Vulnerability Report: Opera 10.x:

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/26745/

Unpatched 0% (0 of 5 Secunia advisories)

----

Download Opera 10.51 FINAL RELEASE, here:

http://my.opera.com/desktopteam/blog/

----

OPERA ALSO SURPASSES FIREFOX IN BROWSING SPEED, at BOTH the javascript processing & HTML processing/parsing speeds levels as well, consistently & for years (per latest SunSpider tests done here recently -> http://www.pcpro.co.uk/gallery/features/356350/on-test-the-hidden-seven-browsers-in-the-windows-ballot/145087 AND IT HAS BEEN "BLOWING AWAY" FIREFOX IN HTML PARSING/PROCESSING SPEEDS AS WELL, & FOR YEARS NOW, per this test years ago -> http://www.howtocreate.co.uk/browserSpeed.html#win and this one too last year also -> http://crave.cnet.co.uk/software/0,39029471,49302491,00.htm )

APK

P.S.=> Nicest part about Opera is that it originates a LOT of what folks consider cool, as far as browser features, & first (e,g, - tabbed browsing anyone), & it contains features you cannot get in FireFox & IE natively (i.e - without addons (such as site by site choices of whether to run javascript on a website, or not (javascript IS what gets you people all "hit" by these online attacks, & sites like SECUNIA.COM or SECURITYFOCUS.COM can show anybody that much, easily)))... apk

See subject-line above, & this report from SECUNIA:

----

Vulnerability Report: Opera 10.x:

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/26745/

Unpatched 0% (0 of 5 Secunia advisories)

----

Download Opera 10.51 FINAL RELEASE, here:

http://my.opera.com/desktopteam/blog/

APK

P.S.=> Nicest part about Opera is that it originates a LOT of what folks consider cool, as far as browser features, & first (e,g, - tabbed browsing anyone), & it contains features you cannot get in FireFox & IE natively (i.e - without addons (such as site by site choices of whether to run javascript on a website, or not (javascript IS what gets you people all "hit" by these online attacks, & sites like SECUNIA.COM or SECURITYFOCUS.COM can show anybody that much, easily)))... apk

Yes, but there is this little detail, which, if you had read http://secunia.com/advisories/38608, you would know. It was not clear that this was a real bug, there were no details known.
A fairly unknown researcher claimed there was a zero day in firefox, without giving enough details to tell where the bug is.
So what happened was that somebody, who we not know if he is to be trusted, claimed there was a bug. Imagine!
Reaction time from knowing the details to roll-out was far better, at least in this case. This is probably not the best bug to be making a point against patching policy with OSS.

Yeah dunno why people keep suggesting lynx.

Links or w3m seem to have a better track record:
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/20922/?task=advisories
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/12960/?task=advisories

vs Lynx:
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/5883/?task=advisories

Yeah dunno why people keep suggesting lynx.

Links or w3m seem to have a better track record:
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/20922/?task=advisories
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/12960/?task=advisories

vs Lynx:
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/5883/?task=advisories

Yeah dunno why people keep suggesting lynx.

Links or w3m seem to have a better track record:
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/20922/?task=advisories
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/12960/?task=advisories

vs Lynx:
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/5883/?task=advisories

http://secunia.com/advisories/search/?search=lynx