Slashdot Mirror

← Back to Domains

Domain: secunia.com

Stories and comments across the archive that link to secunia.com.

Comments · 2,642

  1. Re:Seems others noted what I said by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0 · on Dennis Ritchie Day

    I code fluently in roughly 15 computer languages. I don't waste a lot of time on PHP &/or MySQL (or LAMP for that matter), though I have used them (and even taken coursework in them), & here's why:

    Keeping it "apples-to-apples" too, in terms of the types of software used, LAMP vs. MS stacks for business & development tools!

    ---

    FIRST, OPERATING SYSTEMS:

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Windows Server 2008: (10/30/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/18255/?task=advisories

    Unpatched 3% (4 of 153 Secunia advisories)

    vs. Linux's "latest/greatest" KERNEL ONLY (mind you, just a kernel - toss on the rest of what's in a full linux server distro? You'd have even MORE than this (which is 4x++ that of Windows Server ALONE)):

    ---

    Vulnerability Report: Linux Kernel 2.6.x (10/30/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/2719/?task=advisories

    Unpatched 6% (18 of 281 Secunia advisories)

    ---

    AND YES, there are 3 remotely vulnerable unpatched security problem outstanding in Linux there too, unpatched (despite all the "Open 'SORES' eyes" out there to fix it (yea, "right", not!))

    * Additionally/again - so it "sinks in":

    That's 4x++ more than the ENTIRE GAMUT of what MS gives folks to do business & build tools for it as well has & LAMP certainly cannot show less errors in unpatched security vulnerablities than 4-5 total from MS and ALL OF THEIR PRODUCT LINE IN CURRENT FORMS FOR BUSINESS & DEVELOPMENT, period...

    ---

    SECOND, DATABASE SYSTEMS:

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft SQL Server 2008: (10/30/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/21744/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)

    vs.

    Vulnerability Report: MySQL 5.x (10/30/2011):

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/8355/

    Unpatched 4% (1 of 26 Secunia advisories)

    ---

    THIRD, WEBSERVERS:

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Internet Information Services (IIS) 7.x: (10/30/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/17543/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 6 Secunia advisories)

    vs.

    Vulnerability Report: Apache 2.2.x (10/30/2011):

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/9633/

    Unpatched 8% (2 of 25 Secunia advisories)

    ---

    FOURTH, DEVELOPMENT TOOLSETS:

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Visual Studio 2010: (10/30/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/30853/?task=advisories

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 2 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft .NET Framework 4.x
    (10/30/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/29592/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 8 Secunia advisories)

    vs.

    Vulnerability Report: PHP 5.3.x (10/30/2011):

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/27504/

    Unpatched 8% (1 of 13 Secunia advisories)

    ---

    * "Proofs in the pudding" & "argue with the numbers" + "read 'em & weep", penguins...

    (Simply because I could ALSO put out more... nearly ALL of what MS gives folks for business & development here, and they're STILL be ZERO UNPATCHED security vulnerabilities in MOST the rest of, if not all of, their apps they put out (per my normal list I post here of that),

  2. Re:Seems others noted what I said by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0 · on Dennis Ritchie Day

    I code fluently in roughly 15 computer languages. I don't waste a lot of time on PHP &/or MySQL (or LAMP for that matter), though I have used them (and even taken coursework in them), & here's why:

    Keeping it "apples-to-apples" too, in terms of the types of software used, LAMP vs. MS stacks for business & development tools!

    ---

    FIRST, OPERATING SYSTEMS:

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Windows Server 2008: (10/30/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/18255/?task=advisories

    Unpatched 3% (4 of 153 Secunia advisories)

    vs. Linux's "latest/greatest" KERNEL ONLY (mind you, just a kernel - toss on the rest of what's in a full linux server distro? You'd have even MORE than this (which is 4x++ that of Windows Server ALONE)):

    ---

    Vulnerability Report: Linux Kernel 2.6.x (10/30/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/2719/?task=advisories

    Unpatched 6% (18 of 281 Secunia advisories)

    ---

    AND YES, there are 3 remotely vulnerable unpatched security problem outstanding in Linux there too, unpatched (despite all the "Open 'SORES' eyes" out there to fix it (yea, "right", not!))

    * Additionally/again - so it "sinks in":

    That's 4x++ more than the ENTIRE GAMUT of what MS gives folks to do business & build tools for it as well has & LAMP certainly cannot show less errors in unpatched security vulnerablities than 4-5 total from MS and ALL OF THEIR PRODUCT LINE IN CURRENT FORMS FOR BUSINESS & DEVELOPMENT, period...

    ---

    SECOND, DATABASE SYSTEMS:

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft SQL Server 2008: (10/30/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/21744/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)

    vs.

    Vulnerability Report: MySQL 5.x (10/30/2011):

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/8355/

    Unpatched 4% (1 of 26 Secunia advisories)

    ---

    THIRD, WEBSERVERS:

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Internet Information Services (IIS) 7.x: (10/30/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/17543/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 6 Secunia advisories)

    vs.

    Vulnerability Report: Apache 2.2.x (10/30/2011):

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/9633/

    Unpatched 8% (2 of 25 Secunia advisories)

    ---

    FOURTH, DEVELOPMENT TOOLSETS:

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Visual Studio 2010: (10/30/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/30853/?task=advisories

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 2 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft .NET Framework 4.x
    (10/30/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/29592/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 8 Secunia advisories)

    vs.

    Vulnerability Report: PHP 5.3.x (10/30/2011):

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/27504/

    Unpatched 8% (1 of 13 Secunia advisories)

    ---

    * "Proofs in the pudding" & "argue with the numbers" + "read 'em & weep", penguins...

    (Simply because I could ALSO put out more... nearly ALL of what MS gives folks for business & development here, and they're STILL be ZERO UNPATCHED security vulnerabilities in MOST the rest of, if not all of, their apps they put out (per my normal list I post here of that),

  3. Re:Seems others noted what I said by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0 · on Dennis Ritchie Day

    I code fluently in roughly 15 computer languages. I don't waste a lot of time on PHP &/or MySQL (or LAMP for that matter), though I have used them (and even taken coursework in them), & here's why:

    Keeping it "apples-to-apples" too, in terms of the types of software used, LAMP vs. MS stacks for business & development tools!

    ---

    FIRST, OPERATING SYSTEMS:

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Windows Server 2008: (10/30/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/18255/?task=advisories

    Unpatched 3% (4 of 153 Secunia advisories)

    vs. Linux's "latest/greatest" KERNEL ONLY (mind you, just a kernel - toss on the rest of what's in a full linux server distro? You'd have even MORE than this (which is 4x++ that of Windows Server ALONE)):

    ---

    Vulnerability Report: Linux Kernel 2.6.x (10/30/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/2719/?task=advisories

    Unpatched 6% (18 of 281 Secunia advisories)

    ---

    AND YES, there are 3 remotely vulnerable unpatched security problem outstanding in Linux there too, unpatched (despite all the "Open 'SORES' eyes" out there to fix it (yea, "right", not!))

    * Additionally/again - so it "sinks in":

    That's 4x++ more than the ENTIRE GAMUT of what MS gives folks to do business & build tools for it as well has & LAMP certainly cannot show less errors in unpatched security vulnerablities than 4-5 total from MS and ALL OF THEIR PRODUCT LINE IN CURRENT FORMS FOR BUSINESS & DEVELOPMENT, period...

    ---

    SECOND, DATABASE SYSTEMS:

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft SQL Server 2008: (10/30/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/21744/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)

    vs.

    Vulnerability Report: MySQL 5.x (10/30/2011):

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/8355/

    Unpatched 4% (1 of 26 Secunia advisories)

    ---

    THIRD, WEBSERVERS:

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Internet Information Services (IIS) 7.x: (10/30/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/17543/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 6 Secunia advisories)

    vs.

    Vulnerability Report: Apache 2.2.x (10/30/2011):

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/9633/

    Unpatched 8% (2 of 25 Secunia advisories)

    ---

    FOURTH, DEVELOPMENT TOOLSETS:

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Visual Studio 2010: (10/30/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/30853/?task=advisories

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 2 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft .NET Framework 4.x
    (10/30/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/29592/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 8 Secunia advisories)

    vs.

    Vulnerability Report: PHP 5.3.x (10/30/2011):

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/27504/

    Unpatched 8% (1 of 13 Secunia advisories)

    ---

    * "Proofs in the pudding" & "argue with the numbers" + "read 'em & weep", penguins...

    (Simply because I could ALSO put out more... nearly ALL of what MS gives folks for business & development here, and they're STILL be ZERO UNPATCHED security vulnerabilities in MOST the rest of, if not all of, their apps they put out (per my normal list I post here of that),

  4. Re:He's unlucky his CIO's a fool then by Smallpond · · Score: 1 · on How Can I Justify Using Red Hat When CentOS Exists?

    Especially in terms of unpatched security vulnerabilities - to wit/e.g. (and, we'll compare them, "Apples-to-Apples", by the types of softwares involved for enterprise class development for business):

    FIRST, OPERATING SYSTEMS:

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Windows Server 2008: (10/30/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/18255/?task=advisories

    Unpatched 3% (4 of 153 Secunia advisories)

    vs. Linux's "latest/greatest" KERNEL ONLY (mind you, just a kernel - toss on the rest of what's in a full linux server distro? You'd have even MORE than this (which is 4x++ that of Windows Server ALONE)):

    ---

    Vulnerability Report: Linux Kernel 2.6.x (10/30/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/2719/?task=advisories

    Unpatched 6% (18 of 281 Secunia advisories)

    Let me look at the links.

    How many of the Linux kernel bugs were marked critical by Secunia (4 or 5 of 5)? Oh, none. How many of those 153 Windows bugs were critical? 60!!!!! They released a product with 60 critical bugs!!!!!

    Wow. Thanks for the links. It makes it clear who has the more secure product.

  5. Re:He's unlucky his CIO's a fool then by Smallpond · · Score: 1 · on How Can I Justify Using Red Hat When CentOS Exists?

    Especially in terms of unpatched security vulnerabilities - to wit/e.g. (and, we'll compare them, "Apples-to-Apples", by the types of softwares involved for enterprise class development for business):

    FIRST, OPERATING SYSTEMS:

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Windows Server 2008: (10/30/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/18255/?task=advisories

    Unpatched 3% (4 of 153 Secunia advisories)

    vs. Linux's "latest/greatest" KERNEL ONLY (mind you, just a kernel - toss on the rest of what's in a full linux server distro? You'd have even MORE than this (which is 4x++ that of Windows Server ALONE)):

    ---

    Vulnerability Report: Linux Kernel 2.6.x (10/30/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/2719/?task=advisories

    Unpatched 6% (18 of 281 Secunia advisories)

    Let me look at the links.

    How many of the Linux kernel bugs were marked critical by Secunia (4 or 5 of 5)? Oh, none. How many of those 153 Windows bugs were critical? 60!!!!! They released a product with 60 critical bugs!!!!!

    Wow. Thanks for the links. It makes it clear who has the more secure product.

  6. He's unlucky his CIO's a fool then by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0 · on How Can I Justify Using Red Hat When CentOS Exists?

    Especially in terms of unpatched security vulnerabilities - to wit/e.g. (and, we'll compare them, "Apples-to-Apples", by the types of softwares involved for enterprise class development for business):

    FIRST, OPERATING SYSTEMS:

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Windows Server 2008: (10/30/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/18255/?task=advisories

    Unpatched 3% (4 of 153 Secunia advisories)

    vs. Linux's "latest/greatest" KERNEL ONLY (mind you, just a kernel - toss on the rest of what's in a full linux server distro? You'd have even MORE than this (which is 4x++ that of Windows Server ALONE)):

    ---

    Vulnerability Report: Linux Kernel 2.6.x (10/30/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/2719/?task=advisories

    Unpatched 6% (18 of 281 Secunia advisories)

    ---

    AND YES, there are 3 remotely vulnerable unpatched security problem outstanding in Linux there too, unpatched (despite all the "Open 'SORES' eyes" out there to fix it (yea, "right", not!))

    * Additionally/again - so it "sinks in":

    That's also more than the ENTIRE GAMUT of what MS gives folks to do business & build tools for it as well has & LAMP certainly cannot show less errors in unpatched security vulnerablities than 5 total from MS...

    ---

    SECOND, DATABASE SYSTEMS:

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft SQL Server 2008: (10/30/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/21744/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)

    vs.

    Vulnerability Report: MySQL 5.x (10/30/2011):

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/8355/

    Unpatched 4% (1 of 26 Secunia advisories)

    ---

    THIRD, WEBSERVERS:

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Internet Information Services (IIS) 7.x: (10/30/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/17543/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 6 Secunia advisories)

    vs.

    Vulnerability Report: Apache 2.2.x (10/30/2011):

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/9633/

    Unpatched 8% (2 of 25 Secunia advisories)

    ---

    FOURTH, DEVELOPMENT TOOLSETS:

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Visual Studio 2010: (10/30/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/30853/?task=advisories

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 2 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft .NET Framework 4.x
    (10/30/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/29592/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 8 Secunia advisories)

    vs.

    Vulnerability Report: PHP 5.3.x (10/30/2011):

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/27504/

    Unpatched 8% (1 of 13 Secunia advisories)

    ---

    * "Proofs in the pudding" & "argue with the numbers" + "read 'em & weep", penguins...

    (Simply because I could put out nearly ALL of what MS gives folks for business & development here, and they're STILL be ZERO UNPATCHED security vulnerabilities in MOST the rest of, if not all of, their apps they put out (per my normal list I post here of that), & certainly less than the "Open SORES" world shows us, see above for a sampling)...

    APK

    P.S.=> Now, I predict I'll hear LOADS of unsubstantiated bullshit with no backing proofs to disprove the documented, concrete, & verifiable FACTS I posted above - why? It's typical "penguin/Pro-*NIX" fanatic behavior (along with adhomi

  7. He's unlucky his CIO's a fool then by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0 · on How Can I Justify Using Red Hat When CentOS Exists?

    Especially in terms of unpatched security vulnerabilities - to wit/e.g. (and, we'll compare them, "Apples-to-Apples", by the types of softwares involved for enterprise class development for business):

    FIRST, OPERATING SYSTEMS:

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Windows Server 2008: (10/30/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/18255/?task=advisories

    Unpatched 3% (4 of 153 Secunia advisories)

    vs. Linux's "latest/greatest" KERNEL ONLY (mind you, just a kernel - toss on the rest of what's in a full linux server distro? You'd have even MORE than this (which is 4x++ that of Windows Server ALONE)):

    ---

    Vulnerability Report: Linux Kernel 2.6.x (10/30/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/2719/?task=advisories

    Unpatched 6% (18 of 281 Secunia advisories)

    ---

    AND YES, there are 3 remotely vulnerable unpatched security problem outstanding in Linux there too, unpatched (despite all the "Open 'SORES' eyes" out there to fix it (yea, "right", not!))

    * Additionally/again - so it "sinks in":

    That's also more than the ENTIRE GAMUT of what MS gives folks to do business & build tools for it as well has & LAMP certainly cannot show less errors in unpatched security vulnerablities than 5 total from MS...

    ---

    SECOND, DATABASE SYSTEMS:

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft SQL Server 2008: (10/30/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/21744/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)

    vs.

    Vulnerability Report: MySQL 5.x (10/30/2011):

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/8355/

    Unpatched 4% (1 of 26 Secunia advisories)

    ---

    THIRD, WEBSERVERS:

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Internet Information Services (IIS) 7.x: (10/30/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/17543/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 6 Secunia advisories)

    vs.

    Vulnerability Report: Apache 2.2.x (10/30/2011):

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/9633/

    Unpatched 8% (2 of 25 Secunia advisories)

    ---

    FOURTH, DEVELOPMENT TOOLSETS:

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Visual Studio 2010: (10/30/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/30853/?task=advisories

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 2 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft .NET Framework 4.x
    (10/30/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/29592/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 8 Secunia advisories)

    vs.

    Vulnerability Report: PHP 5.3.x (10/30/2011):

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/27504/

    Unpatched 8% (1 of 13 Secunia advisories)

    ---

    * "Proofs in the pudding" & "argue with the numbers" + "read 'em & weep", penguins...

    (Simply because I could put out nearly ALL of what MS gives folks for business & development here, and they're STILL be ZERO UNPATCHED security vulnerabilities in MOST the rest of, if not all of, their apps they put out (per my normal list I post here of that), & certainly less than the "Open SORES" world shows us, see above for a sampling)...

    APK

    P.S.=> Now, I predict I'll hear LOADS of unsubstantiated bullshit with no backing proofs to disprove the documented, concrete, & verifiable FACTS I posted above - why? It's typical "penguin/Pro-*NIX" fanatic behavior (along with adhomi

  8. He's unlucky his CIO's a fool then by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0 · on How Can I Justify Using Red Hat When CentOS Exists?

    Especially in terms of unpatched security vulnerabilities - to wit/e.g. (and, we'll compare them, "Apples-to-Apples", by the types of softwares involved for enterprise class development for business):

    FIRST, OPERATING SYSTEMS:

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Windows Server 2008: (10/30/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/18255/?task=advisories

    Unpatched 3% (4 of 153 Secunia advisories)

    vs. Linux's "latest/greatest" KERNEL ONLY (mind you, just a kernel - toss on the rest of what's in a full linux server distro? You'd have even MORE than this (which is 4x++ that of Windows Server ALONE)):

    ---

    Vulnerability Report: Linux Kernel 2.6.x (10/30/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/2719/?task=advisories

    Unpatched 6% (18 of 281 Secunia advisories)

    ---

    AND YES, there are 3 remotely vulnerable unpatched security problem outstanding in Linux there too, unpatched (despite all the "Open 'SORES' eyes" out there to fix it (yea, "right", not!))

    * Additionally/again - so it "sinks in":

    That's also more than the ENTIRE GAMUT of what MS gives folks to do business & build tools for it as well has & LAMP certainly cannot show less errors in unpatched security vulnerablities than 5 total from MS...

    ---

    SECOND, DATABASE SYSTEMS:

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft SQL Server 2008: (10/30/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/21744/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)

    vs.

    Vulnerability Report: MySQL 5.x (10/30/2011):

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/8355/

    Unpatched 4% (1 of 26 Secunia advisories)

    ---

    THIRD, WEBSERVERS:

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Internet Information Services (IIS) 7.x: (10/30/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/17543/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 6 Secunia advisories)

    vs.

    Vulnerability Report: Apache 2.2.x (10/30/2011):

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/9633/

    Unpatched 8% (2 of 25 Secunia advisories)

    ---

    FOURTH, DEVELOPMENT TOOLSETS:

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Visual Studio 2010: (10/30/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/30853/?task=advisories

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 2 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft .NET Framework 4.x
    (10/30/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/29592/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 8 Secunia advisories)

    vs.

    Vulnerability Report: PHP 5.3.x (10/30/2011):

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/27504/

    Unpatched 8% (1 of 13 Secunia advisories)

    ---

    * "Proofs in the pudding" & "argue with the numbers" + "read 'em & weep", penguins...

    (Simply because I could put out nearly ALL of what MS gives folks for business & development here, and they're STILL be ZERO UNPATCHED security vulnerabilities in MOST the rest of, if not all of, their apps they put out (per my normal list I post here of that), & certainly less than the "Open SORES" world shows us, see above for a sampling)...

    APK

    P.S.=> Now, I predict I'll hear LOADS of unsubstantiated bullshit with no backing proofs to disprove the documented, concrete, & verifiable FACTS I posted above - why? It's typical "penguin/Pro-*NIX" fanatic behavior (along with adhomi

  9. He's unlucky his CIO's a fool then by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0 · on How Can I Justify Using Red Hat When CentOS Exists?

    Especially in terms of unpatched security vulnerabilities - to wit/e.g. (and, we'll compare them, "Apples-to-Apples", by the types of softwares involved for enterprise class development for business):

    FIRST, OPERATING SYSTEMS:

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Windows Server 2008: (10/30/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/18255/?task=advisories

    Unpatched 3% (4 of 153 Secunia advisories)

    vs. Linux's "latest/greatest" KERNEL ONLY (mind you, just a kernel - toss on the rest of what's in a full linux server distro? You'd have even MORE than this (which is 4x++ that of Windows Server ALONE)):

    ---

    Vulnerability Report: Linux Kernel 2.6.x (10/30/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/2719/?task=advisories

    Unpatched 6% (18 of 281 Secunia advisories)

    ---

    AND YES, there are 3 remotely vulnerable unpatched security problem outstanding in Linux there too, unpatched (despite all the "Open 'SORES' eyes" out there to fix it (yea, "right", not!))

    * Additionally/again - so it "sinks in":

    That's also more than the ENTIRE GAMUT of what MS gives folks to do business & build tools for it as well has & LAMP certainly cannot show less errors in unpatched security vulnerablities than 5 total from MS...

    ---

    SECOND, DATABASE SYSTEMS:

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft SQL Server 2008: (10/30/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/21744/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)

    vs.

    Vulnerability Report: MySQL 5.x (10/30/2011):

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/8355/

    Unpatched 4% (1 of 26 Secunia advisories)

    ---

    THIRD, WEBSERVERS:

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Internet Information Services (IIS) 7.x: (10/30/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/17543/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 6 Secunia advisories)

    vs.

    Vulnerability Report: Apache 2.2.x (10/30/2011):

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/9633/

    Unpatched 8% (2 of 25 Secunia advisories)

    ---

    FOURTH, DEVELOPMENT TOOLSETS:

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Visual Studio 2010: (10/30/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/30853/?task=advisories

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 2 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft .NET Framework 4.x
    (10/30/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/29592/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 8 Secunia advisories)

    vs.

    Vulnerability Report: PHP 5.3.x (10/30/2011):

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/27504/

    Unpatched 8% (1 of 13 Secunia advisories)

    ---

    * "Proofs in the pudding" & "argue with the numbers" + "read 'em & weep", penguins...

    (Simply because I could put out nearly ALL of what MS gives folks for business & development here, and they're STILL be ZERO UNPATCHED security vulnerabilities in MOST the rest of, if not all of, their apps they put out (per my normal list I post here of that), & certainly less than the "Open SORES" world shows us, see above for a sampling)...

    APK

    P.S.=> Now, I predict I'll hear LOADS of unsubstantiated bullshit with no backing proofs to disprove the documented, concrete, & verifiable FACTS I posted above - why? It's typical "penguin/Pro-*NIX" fanatic behavior (along with adhomi

  10. He's unlucky his CIO's a fool then by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0 · on How Can I Justify Using Red Hat When CentOS Exists?

    Especially in terms of unpatched security vulnerabilities - to wit/e.g. (and, we'll compare them, "Apples-to-Apples", by the types of softwares involved for enterprise class development for business):

    FIRST, OPERATING SYSTEMS:

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Windows Server 2008: (10/30/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/18255/?task=advisories

    Unpatched 3% (4 of 153 Secunia advisories)

    vs. Linux's "latest/greatest" KERNEL ONLY (mind you, just a kernel - toss on the rest of what's in a full linux server distro? You'd have even MORE than this (which is 4x++ that of Windows Server ALONE)):

    ---

    Vulnerability Report: Linux Kernel 2.6.x (10/30/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/2719/?task=advisories

    Unpatched 6% (18 of 281 Secunia advisories)

    ---

    AND YES, there are 3 remotely vulnerable unpatched security problem outstanding in Linux there too, unpatched (despite all the "Open 'SORES' eyes" out there to fix it (yea, "right", not!))

    * Additionally/again - so it "sinks in":

    That's also more than the ENTIRE GAMUT of what MS gives folks to do business & build tools for it as well has & LAMP certainly cannot show less errors in unpatched security vulnerablities than 5 total from MS...

    ---

    SECOND, DATABASE SYSTEMS:

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft SQL Server 2008: (10/30/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/21744/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)

    vs.

    Vulnerability Report: MySQL 5.x (10/30/2011):

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/8355/

    Unpatched 4% (1 of 26 Secunia advisories)

    ---

    THIRD, WEBSERVERS:

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Internet Information Services (IIS) 7.x: (10/30/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/17543/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 6 Secunia advisories)

    vs.

    Vulnerability Report: Apache 2.2.x (10/30/2011):

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/9633/

    Unpatched 8% (2 of 25 Secunia advisories)

    ---

    FOURTH, DEVELOPMENT TOOLSETS:

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Visual Studio 2010: (10/30/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/30853/?task=advisories

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 2 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft .NET Framework 4.x
    (10/30/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/29592/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 8 Secunia advisories)

    vs.

    Vulnerability Report: PHP 5.3.x (10/30/2011):

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/27504/

    Unpatched 8% (1 of 13 Secunia advisories)

    ---

    * "Proofs in the pudding" & "argue with the numbers" + "read 'em & weep", penguins...

    (Simply because I could put out nearly ALL of what MS gives folks for business & development here, and they're STILL be ZERO UNPATCHED security vulnerabilities in MOST the rest of, if not all of, their apps they put out (per my normal list I post here of that), & certainly less than the "Open SORES" world shows us, see above for a sampling)...

    APK

    P.S.=> Now, I predict I'll hear LOADS of unsubstantiated bullshit with no backing proofs to disprove the documented, concrete, & verifiable FACTS I posted above - why? It's typical "penguin/Pro-*NIX" fanatic behavior (along with adhomi

  11. He's unlucky his CIO's a fool then by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0 · on How Can I Justify Using Red Hat When CentOS Exists?

    Especially in terms of unpatched security vulnerabilities - to wit/e.g. (and, we'll compare them, "Apples-to-Apples", by the types of softwares involved for enterprise class development for business):

    FIRST, OPERATING SYSTEMS:

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Windows Server 2008: (10/30/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/18255/?task=advisories

    Unpatched 3% (4 of 153 Secunia advisories)

    vs. Linux's "latest/greatest" KERNEL ONLY (mind you, just a kernel - toss on the rest of what's in a full linux server distro? You'd have even MORE than this (which is 4x++ that of Windows Server ALONE)):

    ---

    Vulnerability Report: Linux Kernel 2.6.x (10/30/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/2719/?task=advisories

    Unpatched 6% (18 of 281 Secunia advisories)

    ---

    AND YES, there are 3 remotely vulnerable unpatched security problem outstanding in Linux there too, unpatched (despite all the "Open 'SORES' eyes" out there to fix it (yea, "right", not!))

    * Additionally/again - so it "sinks in":

    That's also more than the ENTIRE GAMUT of what MS gives folks to do business & build tools for it as well has & LAMP certainly cannot show less errors in unpatched security vulnerablities than 5 total from MS...

    ---

    SECOND, DATABASE SYSTEMS:

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft SQL Server 2008: (10/30/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/21744/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)

    vs.

    Vulnerability Report: MySQL 5.x (10/30/2011):

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/8355/

    Unpatched 4% (1 of 26 Secunia advisories)

    ---

    THIRD, WEBSERVERS:

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Internet Information Services (IIS) 7.x: (10/30/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/17543/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 6 Secunia advisories)

    vs.

    Vulnerability Report: Apache 2.2.x (10/30/2011):

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/9633/

    Unpatched 8% (2 of 25 Secunia advisories)

    ---

    FOURTH, DEVELOPMENT TOOLSETS:

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Visual Studio 2010: (10/30/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/30853/?task=advisories

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 2 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft .NET Framework 4.x
    (10/30/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/29592/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 8 Secunia advisories)

    vs.

    Vulnerability Report: PHP 5.3.x (10/30/2011):

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/27504/

    Unpatched 8% (1 of 13 Secunia advisories)

    ---

    * "Proofs in the pudding" & "argue with the numbers" + "read 'em & weep", penguins...

    (Simply because I could put out nearly ALL of what MS gives folks for business & development here, and they're STILL be ZERO UNPATCHED security vulnerabilities in MOST the rest of, if not all of, their apps they put out (per my normal list I post here of that), & certainly less than the "Open SORES" world shows us, see above for a sampling)...

    APK

    P.S.=> Now, I predict I'll hear LOADS of unsubstantiated bullshit with no backing proofs to disprove the documented, concrete, & verifiable FACTS I posted above - why? It's typical "penguin/Pro-*NIX" fanatic behavior (along with adhomi

  12. He's unlucky his CIO's a fool then by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0 · on How Can I Justify Using Red Hat When CentOS Exists?

    Especially in terms of unpatched security vulnerabilities - to wit/e.g. (and, we'll compare them, "Apples-to-Apples", by the types of softwares involved for enterprise class development for business):

    FIRST, OPERATING SYSTEMS:

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Windows Server 2008: (10/30/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/18255/?task=advisories

    Unpatched 3% (4 of 153 Secunia advisories)

    vs. Linux's "latest/greatest" KERNEL ONLY (mind you, just a kernel - toss on the rest of what's in a full linux server distro? You'd have even MORE than this (which is 4x++ that of Windows Server ALONE)):

    ---

    Vulnerability Report: Linux Kernel 2.6.x (10/30/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/2719/?task=advisories

    Unpatched 6% (18 of 281 Secunia advisories)

    ---

    AND YES, there are 3 remotely vulnerable unpatched security problem outstanding in Linux there too, unpatched (despite all the "Open 'SORES' eyes" out there to fix it (yea, "right", not!))

    * Additionally/again - so it "sinks in":

    That's also more than the ENTIRE GAMUT of what MS gives folks to do business & build tools for it as well has & LAMP certainly cannot show less errors in unpatched security vulnerablities than 5 total from MS...

    ---

    SECOND, DATABASE SYSTEMS:

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft SQL Server 2008: (10/30/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/21744/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)

    vs.

    Vulnerability Report: MySQL 5.x (10/30/2011):

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/8355/

    Unpatched 4% (1 of 26 Secunia advisories)

    ---

    THIRD, WEBSERVERS:

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Internet Information Services (IIS) 7.x: (10/30/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/17543/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 6 Secunia advisories)

    vs.

    Vulnerability Report: Apache 2.2.x (10/30/2011):

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/9633/

    Unpatched 8% (2 of 25 Secunia advisories)

    ---

    FOURTH, DEVELOPMENT TOOLSETS:

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Visual Studio 2010: (10/30/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/30853/?task=advisories

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 2 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft .NET Framework 4.x
    (10/30/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/29592/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 8 Secunia advisories)

    vs.

    Vulnerability Report: PHP 5.3.x (10/30/2011):

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/27504/

    Unpatched 8% (1 of 13 Secunia advisories)

    ---

    * "Proofs in the pudding" & "argue with the numbers" + "read 'em & weep", penguins...

    (Simply because I could put out nearly ALL of what MS gives folks for business & development here, and they're STILL be ZERO UNPATCHED security vulnerabilities in MOST the rest of, if not all of, their apps they put out (per my normal list I post here of that), & certainly less than the "Open SORES" world shows us, see above for a sampling)...

    APK

    P.S.=> Now, I predict I'll hear LOADS of unsubstantiated bullshit with no backing proofs to disprove the documented, concrete, & verifiable FACTS I posted above - why? It's typical "penguin/Pro-*NIX" fanatic behavior (along with adhomi

  13. He's unlucky his CIO's a fool then by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0 · on How Can I Justify Using Red Hat When CentOS Exists?

    Especially in terms of unpatched security vulnerabilities - to wit/e.g. (and, we'll compare them, "Apples-to-Apples", by the types of softwares involved for enterprise class development for business):

    FIRST, OPERATING SYSTEMS:

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Windows Server 2008: (10/30/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/18255/?task=advisories

    Unpatched 3% (4 of 153 Secunia advisories)

    vs. Linux's "latest/greatest" KERNEL ONLY (mind you, just a kernel - toss on the rest of what's in a full linux server distro? You'd have even MORE than this (which is 4x++ that of Windows Server ALONE)):

    ---

    Vulnerability Report: Linux Kernel 2.6.x (10/30/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/2719/?task=advisories

    Unpatched 6% (18 of 281 Secunia advisories)

    ---

    AND YES, there are 3 remotely vulnerable unpatched security problem outstanding in Linux there too, unpatched (despite all the "Open 'SORES' eyes" out there to fix it (yea, "right", not!))

    * Additionally/again - so it "sinks in":

    That's also more than the ENTIRE GAMUT of what MS gives folks to do business & build tools for it as well has & LAMP certainly cannot show less errors in unpatched security vulnerablities than 5 total from MS...

    ---

    SECOND, DATABASE SYSTEMS:

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft SQL Server 2008: (10/30/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/21744/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)

    vs.

    Vulnerability Report: MySQL 5.x (10/30/2011):

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/8355/

    Unpatched 4% (1 of 26 Secunia advisories)

    ---

    THIRD, WEBSERVERS:

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Internet Information Services (IIS) 7.x: (10/30/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/17543/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 6 Secunia advisories)

    vs.

    Vulnerability Report: Apache 2.2.x (10/30/2011):

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/9633/

    Unpatched 8% (2 of 25 Secunia advisories)

    ---

    FOURTH, DEVELOPMENT TOOLSETS:

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Visual Studio 2010: (10/30/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/30853/?task=advisories

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 2 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft .NET Framework 4.x
    (10/30/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/29592/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 8 Secunia advisories)

    vs.

    Vulnerability Report: PHP 5.3.x (10/30/2011):

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/27504/

    Unpatched 8% (1 of 13 Secunia advisories)

    ---

    * "Proofs in the pudding" & "argue with the numbers" + "read 'em & weep", penguins...

    (Simply because I could put out nearly ALL of what MS gives folks for business & development here, and they're STILL be ZERO UNPATCHED security vulnerabilities in MOST the rest of, if not all of, their apps they put out (per my normal list I post here of that), & certainly less than the "Open SORES" world shows us, see above for a sampling)...

    APK

    P.S.=> Now, I predict I'll hear LOADS of unsubstantiated bullshit with no backing proofs to disprove the documented, concrete, & verifiable FACTS I posted above - why? It's typical "penguin/Pro-*NIX" fanatic behavior (along with adhomi

  14. He's unlucky his CIO's a fool then by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0 · on How Can I Justify Using Red Hat When CentOS Exists?

    Especially in terms of unpatched security vulnerabilities - to wit/e.g. (and, we'll compare them, "Apples-to-Apples", by the types of softwares involved for enterprise class development for business):

    FIRST, OPERATING SYSTEMS:

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Windows Server 2008: (10/30/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/18255/?task=advisories

    Unpatched 3% (4 of 153 Secunia advisories)

    vs. Linux's "latest/greatest" KERNEL ONLY (mind you, just a kernel - toss on the rest of what's in a full linux server distro? You'd have even MORE than this (which is 4x++ that of Windows Server ALONE)):

    ---

    Vulnerability Report: Linux Kernel 2.6.x (10/30/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/2719/?task=advisories

    Unpatched 6% (18 of 281 Secunia advisories)

    ---

    AND YES, there are 3 remotely vulnerable unpatched security problem outstanding in Linux there too, unpatched (despite all the "Open 'SORES' eyes" out there to fix it (yea, "right", not!))

    * Additionally/again - so it "sinks in":

    That's also more than the ENTIRE GAMUT of what MS gives folks to do business & build tools for it as well has & LAMP certainly cannot show less errors in unpatched security vulnerablities than 5 total from MS...

    ---

    SECOND, DATABASE SYSTEMS:

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft SQL Server 2008: (10/30/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/21744/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)

    vs.

    Vulnerability Report: MySQL 5.x (10/30/2011):

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/8355/

    Unpatched 4% (1 of 26 Secunia advisories)

    ---

    THIRD, WEBSERVERS:

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Internet Information Services (IIS) 7.x: (10/30/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/17543/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 6 Secunia advisories)

    vs.

    Vulnerability Report: Apache 2.2.x (10/30/2011):

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/9633/

    Unpatched 8% (2 of 25 Secunia advisories)

    ---

    FOURTH, DEVELOPMENT TOOLSETS:

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Visual Studio 2010: (10/30/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/30853/?task=advisories

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 2 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft .NET Framework 4.x
    (10/30/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/29592/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 8 Secunia advisories)

    vs.

    Vulnerability Report: PHP 5.3.x (10/30/2011):

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/27504/

    Unpatched 8% (1 of 13 Secunia advisories)

    ---

    * "Proofs in the pudding" & "argue with the numbers" + "read 'em & weep", penguins...

    (Simply because I could put out nearly ALL of what MS gives folks for business & development here, and they're STILL be ZERO UNPATCHED security vulnerabilities in MOST the rest of, if not all of, their apps they put out (per my normal list I post here of that), & certainly less than the "Open SORES" world shows us, see above for a sampling)...

    APK

    P.S.=> Now, I predict I'll hear LOADS of unsubstantiated bullshit with no backing proofs to disprove the documented, concrete, & verifiable FACTS I posted above - why? It's typical "penguin/Pro-*NIX" fanatic behavior (along with adhomi

  15. Disprove these documented facts then by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0 · on Linux Foundation Releases Document On UEFI Secure Boot

    1st - Linux also doesn't have as high quality drivers or as many because board makers KNOW what is "running the show/market " out there, Windows - so, they cater to it immensely!

    2nd - Nor does Linux have as many games, by FAR, either (this is mostly the home market in fact!)

    3rd - Not only that. but Linux, in its KERNEL ONLY mind you? Has 4x the unpatched security vulnerabilities Windows 7 has (which IS a complete "distro" with all of its parts, not just a kernel only)!

    4th - Despite all those "Open 'SORES'" eyes (most of whom couldn't code to SAVE THEIR LIVES mind you) allegedly poring over Linux code, how come it has that many more unpatched bugs than Windows 7 has, hmmm??

    Closed source is HARDER for hacker/crackers to attack as well, because you're stuck either disassembling it (especially tough with kernel level debuggers) OR fuzzing it, either is tougher than searching out problems in Linux, which you just load into a compiler & step trace its "Open 'SORES'" code with to find screwups in security... hence it still has more security bugs, AND, they are unpatched (despite all the "Open 'SORES'" eyes poring over it, lol!)

    Fact, period!

    5th - In fact, Linux's kernel ALONE has 4x the # of unpatched bugs the ENTIRE SUITE/ARRAY OF WHAT MICROSOFT GIVES YOU TO DO BUSINESS & DEVELOPMENT WITH!

    Proof? Ok:

    This data's ALL from a respected source (secunia.com) for known security vulnerabilities unpatched:

    ---

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft SQL Server 2008: (11/27/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/21744/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Internet Information Services (IIS) 7.x: (11/27/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/17543/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 6 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Exchange Server 2010: (11/27/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/28234/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 0 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft SharePoint Server 2010: (11/27/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/29809/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 3 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Forefront Endpoint Protection 2010: (11/27/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/34343/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Baseline Security Analyzer 2.x: (11/27/2011):

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/6436/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 0 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Office 2010: (11/27/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/30529/?task=advisories

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 9 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Project 2010: (11/27/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/31177/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 0 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Windows Services for UNIX 3.x: (11/27/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/5244/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 3 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Internet Explorer 9.x: (11/27/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/34591/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 4 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft

  16. Disprove these documented facts then by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0 · on Linux Foundation Releases Document On UEFI Secure Boot

    1st - Linux also doesn't have as high quality drivers or as many because board makers KNOW what is "running the show/market " out there, Windows - so, they cater to it immensely!

    2nd - Nor does Linux have as many games, by FAR, either (this is mostly the home market in fact!)

    3rd - Not only that. but Linux, in its KERNEL ONLY mind you? Has 4x the unpatched security vulnerabilities Windows 7 has (which IS a complete "distro" with all of its parts, not just a kernel only)!

    4th - Despite all those "Open 'SORES'" eyes (most of whom couldn't code to SAVE THEIR LIVES mind you) allegedly poring over Linux code, how come it has that many more unpatched bugs than Windows 7 has, hmmm??

    Closed source is HARDER for hacker/crackers to attack as well, because you're stuck either disassembling it (especially tough with kernel level debuggers) OR fuzzing it, either is tougher than searching out problems in Linux, which you just load into a compiler & step trace its "Open 'SORES'" code with to find screwups in security... hence it still has more security bugs, AND, they are unpatched (despite all the "Open 'SORES'" eyes poring over it, lol!)

    Fact, period!

    5th - In fact, Linux's kernel ALONE has 4x the # of unpatched bugs the ENTIRE SUITE/ARRAY OF WHAT MICROSOFT GIVES YOU TO DO BUSINESS & DEVELOPMENT WITH!

    Proof? Ok:

    This data's ALL from a respected source (secunia.com) for known security vulnerabilities unpatched:

    ---

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft SQL Server 2008: (11/27/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/21744/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Internet Information Services (IIS) 7.x: (11/27/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/17543/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 6 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Exchange Server 2010: (11/27/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/28234/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 0 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft SharePoint Server 2010: (11/27/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/29809/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 3 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Forefront Endpoint Protection 2010: (11/27/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/34343/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Baseline Security Analyzer 2.x: (11/27/2011):

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/6436/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 0 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Office 2010: (11/27/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/30529/?task=advisories

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 9 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Project 2010: (11/27/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/31177/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 0 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Windows Services for UNIX 3.x: (11/27/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/5244/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 3 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Internet Explorer 9.x: (11/27/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/34591/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 4 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft

  17. Disprove these documented facts then by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0 · on Linux Foundation Releases Document On UEFI Secure Boot

    1st - Linux also doesn't have as high quality drivers or as many because board makers KNOW what is "running the show/market " out there, Windows - so, they cater to it immensely!

    2nd - Nor does Linux have as many games, by FAR, either (this is mostly the home market in fact!)

    3rd - Not only that. but Linux, in its KERNEL ONLY mind you? Has 4x the unpatched security vulnerabilities Windows 7 has (which IS a complete "distro" with all of its parts, not just a kernel only)!

    4th - Despite all those "Open 'SORES'" eyes (most of whom couldn't code to SAVE THEIR LIVES mind you) allegedly poring over Linux code, how come it has that many more unpatched bugs than Windows 7 has, hmmm??

    Closed source is HARDER for hacker/crackers to attack as well, because you're stuck either disassembling it (especially tough with kernel level debuggers) OR fuzzing it, either is tougher than searching out problems in Linux, which you just load into a compiler & step trace its "Open 'SORES'" code with to find screwups in security... hence it still has more security bugs, AND, they are unpatched (despite all the "Open 'SORES'" eyes poring over it, lol!)

    Fact, period!

    5th - In fact, Linux's kernel ALONE has 4x the # of unpatched bugs the ENTIRE SUITE/ARRAY OF WHAT MICROSOFT GIVES YOU TO DO BUSINESS & DEVELOPMENT WITH!

    Proof? Ok:

    This data's ALL from a respected source (secunia.com) for known security vulnerabilities unpatched:

    ---

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft SQL Server 2008: (11/27/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/21744/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Internet Information Services (IIS) 7.x: (11/27/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/17543/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 6 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Exchange Server 2010: (11/27/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/28234/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 0 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft SharePoint Server 2010: (11/27/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/29809/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 3 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Forefront Endpoint Protection 2010: (11/27/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/34343/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Baseline Security Analyzer 2.x: (11/27/2011):

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/6436/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 0 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Office 2010: (11/27/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/30529/?task=advisories

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 9 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Project 2010: (11/27/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/31177/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 0 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Windows Services for UNIX 3.x: (11/27/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/5244/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 3 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Internet Explorer 9.x: (11/27/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/34591/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 4 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft

  18. Disprove these documented facts then by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0 · on Linux Foundation Releases Document On UEFI Secure Boot

    1st - Linux also doesn't have as high quality drivers or as many because board makers KNOW what is "running the show/market " out there, Windows - so, they cater to it immensely!

    2nd - Nor does Linux have as many games, by FAR, either (this is mostly the home market in fact!)

    3rd - Not only that. but Linux, in its KERNEL ONLY mind you? Has 4x the unpatched security vulnerabilities Windows 7 has (which IS a complete "distro" with all of its parts, not just a kernel only)!

    4th - Despite all those "Open 'SORES'" eyes (most of whom couldn't code to SAVE THEIR LIVES mind you) allegedly poring over Linux code, how come it has that many more unpatched bugs than Windows 7 has, hmmm??

    Closed source is HARDER for hacker/crackers to attack as well, because you're stuck either disassembling it (especially tough with kernel level debuggers) OR fuzzing it, either is tougher than searching out problems in Linux, which you just load into a compiler & step trace its "Open 'SORES'" code with to find screwups in security... hence it still has more security bugs, AND, they are unpatched (despite all the "Open 'SORES'" eyes poring over it, lol!)

    Fact, period!

    5th - In fact, Linux's kernel ALONE has 4x the # of unpatched bugs the ENTIRE SUITE/ARRAY OF WHAT MICROSOFT GIVES YOU TO DO BUSINESS & DEVELOPMENT WITH!

    Proof? Ok:

    This data's ALL from a respected source (secunia.com) for known security vulnerabilities unpatched:

    ---

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft SQL Server 2008: (11/27/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/21744/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Internet Information Services (IIS) 7.x: (11/27/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/17543/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 6 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Exchange Server 2010: (11/27/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/28234/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 0 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft SharePoint Server 2010: (11/27/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/29809/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 3 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Forefront Endpoint Protection 2010: (11/27/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/34343/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Baseline Security Analyzer 2.x: (11/27/2011):

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/6436/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 0 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Office 2010: (11/27/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/30529/?task=advisories

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 9 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Project 2010: (11/27/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/31177/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 0 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Windows Services for UNIX 3.x: (11/27/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/5244/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 3 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Internet Explorer 9.x: (11/27/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/34591/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 4 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft

  19. Disprove these documented facts then by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0 · on Linux Foundation Releases Document On UEFI Secure Boot

    1st - Linux also doesn't have as high quality drivers or as many because board makers KNOW what is "running the show/market " out there, Windows - so, they cater to it immensely!

    2nd - Nor does Linux have as many games, by FAR, either (this is mostly the home market in fact!)

    3rd - Not only that. but Linux, in its KERNEL ONLY mind you? Has 4x the unpatched security vulnerabilities Windows 7 has (which IS a complete "distro" with all of its parts, not just a kernel only)!

    4th - Despite all those "Open 'SORES'" eyes (most of whom couldn't code to SAVE THEIR LIVES mind you) allegedly poring over Linux code, how come it has that many more unpatched bugs than Windows 7 has, hmmm??

    Closed source is HARDER for hacker/crackers to attack as well, because you're stuck either disassembling it (especially tough with kernel level debuggers) OR fuzzing it, either is tougher than searching out problems in Linux, which you just load into a compiler & step trace its "Open 'SORES'" code with to find screwups in security... hence it still has more security bugs, AND, they are unpatched (despite all the "Open 'SORES'" eyes poring over it, lol!)

    Fact, period!

    5th - In fact, Linux's kernel ALONE has 4x the # of unpatched bugs the ENTIRE SUITE/ARRAY OF WHAT MICROSOFT GIVES YOU TO DO BUSINESS & DEVELOPMENT WITH!

    Proof? Ok:

    This data's ALL from a respected source (secunia.com) for known security vulnerabilities unpatched:

    ---

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft SQL Server 2008: (11/27/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/21744/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Internet Information Services (IIS) 7.x: (11/27/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/17543/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 6 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Exchange Server 2010: (11/27/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/28234/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 0 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft SharePoint Server 2010: (11/27/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/29809/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 3 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Forefront Endpoint Protection 2010: (11/27/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/34343/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Baseline Security Analyzer 2.x: (11/27/2011):

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/6436/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 0 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Office 2010: (11/27/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/30529/?task=advisories

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 9 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Project 2010: (11/27/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/31177/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 0 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Windows Services for UNIX 3.x: (11/27/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/5244/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 3 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Internet Explorer 9.x: (11/27/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/34591/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 4 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft

  20. Disprove these documented facts then by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0 · on Linux Foundation Releases Document On UEFI Secure Boot

    1st - Linux also doesn't have as high quality drivers or as many because board makers KNOW what is "running the show/market " out there, Windows - so, they cater to it immensely!

    2nd - Nor does Linux have as many games, by FAR, either (this is mostly the home market in fact!)

    3rd - Not only that. but Linux, in its KERNEL ONLY mind you? Has 4x the unpatched security vulnerabilities Windows 7 has (which IS a complete "distro" with all of its parts, not just a kernel only)!

    4th - Despite all those "Open 'SORES'" eyes (most of whom couldn't code to SAVE THEIR LIVES mind you) allegedly poring over Linux code, how come it has that many more unpatched bugs than Windows 7 has, hmmm??

    Closed source is HARDER for hacker/crackers to attack as well, because you're stuck either disassembling it (especially tough with kernel level debuggers) OR fuzzing it, either is tougher than searching out problems in Linux, which you just load into a compiler & step trace its "Open 'SORES'" code with to find screwups in security... hence it still has more security bugs, AND, they are unpatched (despite all the "Open 'SORES'" eyes poring over it, lol!)

    Fact, period!

    5th - In fact, Linux's kernel ALONE has 4x the # of unpatched bugs the ENTIRE SUITE/ARRAY OF WHAT MICROSOFT GIVES YOU TO DO BUSINESS & DEVELOPMENT WITH!

    Proof? Ok:

    This data's ALL from a respected source (secunia.com) for known security vulnerabilities unpatched:

    ---

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft SQL Server 2008: (11/27/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/21744/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Internet Information Services (IIS) 7.x: (11/27/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/17543/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 6 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Exchange Server 2010: (11/27/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/28234/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 0 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft SharePoint Server 2010: (11/27/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/29809/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 3 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Forefront Endpoint Protection 2010: (11/27/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/34343/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Baseline Security Analyzer 2.x: (11/27/2011):

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/6436/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 0 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Office 2010: (11/27/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/30529/?task=advisories

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 9 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Project 2010: (11/27/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/31177/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 0 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Windows Services for UNIX 3.x: (11/27/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/5244/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 3 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Internet Explorer 9.x: (11/27/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/34591/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 4 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft

  21. Disprove these documented facts then by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0 · on Linux Foundation Releases Document On UEFI Secure Boot

    1st - Linux also doesn't have as high quality drivers or as many because board makers KNOW what is "running the show/market " out there, Windows - so, they cater to it immensely!

    2nd - Nor does Linux have as many games, by FAR, either (this is mostly the home market in fact!)

    3rd - Not only that. but Linux, in its KERNEL ONLY mind you? Has 4x the unpatched security vulnerabilities Windows 7 has (which IS a complete "distro" with all of its parts, not just a kernel only)!

    4th - Despite all those "Open 'SORES'" eyes (most of whom couldn't code to SAVE THEIR LIVES mind you) allegedly poring over Linux code, how come it has that many more unpatched bugs than Windows 7 has, hmmm??

    Closed source is HARDER for hacker/crackers to attack as well, because you're stuck either disassembling it (especially tough with kernel level debuggers) OR fuzzing it, either is tougher than searching out problems in Linux, which you just load into a compiler & step trace its "Open 'SORES'" code with to find screwups in security... hence it still has more security bugs, AND, they are unpatched (despite all the "Open 'SORES'" eyes poring over it, lol!)

    Fact, period!

    5th - In fact, Linux's kernel ALONE has 4x the # of unpatched bugs the ENTIRE SUITE/ARRAY OF WHAT MICROSOFT GIVES YOU TO DO BUSINESS & DEVELOPMENT WITH!

    Proof? Ok:

    This data's ALL from a respected source (secunia.com) for known security vulnerabilities unpatched:

    ---

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft SQL Server 2008: (11/27/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/21744/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Internet Information Services (IIS) 7.x: (11/27/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/17543/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 6 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Exchange Server 2010: (11/27/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/28234/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 0 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft SharePoint Server 2010: (11/27/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/29809/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 3 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Forefront Endpoint Protection 2010: (11/27/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/34343/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Baseline Security Analyzer 2.x: (11/27/2011):

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/6436/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 0 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Office 2010: (11/27/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/30529/?task=advisories

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 9 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Project 2010: (11/27/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/31177/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 0 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Windows Services for UNIX 3.x: (11/27/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/5244/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 3 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Internet Explorer 9.x: (11/27/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/34591/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 4 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft

  22. Disprove these documented facts then by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0 · on Linux Foundation Releases Document On UEFI Secure Boot

    1st - Linux also doesn't have as high quality drivers or as many because board makers KNOW what is "running the show/market " out there, Windows - so, they cater to it immensely!

    2nd - Nor does Linux have as many games, by FAR, either (this is mostly the home market in fact!)

    3rd - Not only that. but Linux, in its KERNEL ONLY mind you? Has 4x the unpatched security vulnerabilities Windows 7 has (which IS a complete "distro" with all of its parts, not just a kernel only)!

    4th - Despite all those "Open 'SORES'" eyes (most of whom couldn't code to SAVE THEIR LIVES mind you) allegedly poring over Linux code, how come it has that many more unpatched bugs than Windows 7 has, hmmm??

    Closed source is HARDER for hacker/crackers to attack as well, because you're stuck either disassembling it (especially tough with kernel level debuggers) OR fuzzing it, either is tougher than searching out problems in Linux, which you just load into a compiler & step trace its "Open 'SORES'" code with to find screwups in security... hence it still has more security bugs, AND, they are unpatched (despite all the "Open 'SORES'" eyes poring over it, lol!)

    Fact, period!

    5th - In fact, Linux's kernel ALONE has 4x the # of unpatched bugs the ENTIRE SUITE/ARRAY OF WHAT MICROSOFT GIVES YOU TO DO BUSINESS & DEVELOPMENT WITH!

    Proof? Ok:

    This data's ALL from a respected source (secunia.com) for known security vulnerabilities unpatched:

    ---

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft SQL Server 2008: (11/27/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/21744/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Internet Information Services (IIS) 7.x: (11/27/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/17543/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 6 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Exchange Server 2010: (11/27/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/28234/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 0 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft SharePoint Server 2010: (11/27/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/29809/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 3 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Forefront Endpoint Protection 2010: (11/27/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/34343/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Baseline Security Analyzer 2.x: (11/27/2011):

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/6436/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 0 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Office 2010: (11/27/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/30529/?task=advisories

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 9 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Project 2010: (11/27/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/31177/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 0 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Windows Services for UNIX 3.x: (11/27/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/5244/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 3 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Internet Explorer 9.x: (11/27/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/34591/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 4 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft

  23. Disprove these documented facts then by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0 · on Linux Foundation Releases Document On UEFI Secure Boot

    1st - Linux also doesn't have as high quality drivers or as many because board makers KNOW what is "running the show/market " out there, Windows - so, they cater to it immensely!

    2nd - Nor does Linux have as many games, by FAR, either (this is mostly the home market in fact!)

    3rd - Not only that. but Linux, in its KERNEL ONLY mind you? Has 4x the unpatched security vulnerabilities Windows 7 has (which IS a complete "distro" with all of its parts, not just a kernel only)!

    4th - Despite all those "Open 'SORES'" eyes (most of whom couldn't code to SAVE THEIR LIVES mind you) allegedly poring over Linux code, how come it has that many more unpatched bugs than Windows 7 has, hmmm??

    Closed source is HARDER for hacker/crackers to attack as well, because you're stuck either disassembling it (especially tough with kernel level debuggers) OR fuzzing it, either is tougher than searching out problems in Linux, which you just load into a compiler & step trace its "Open 'SORES'" code with to find screwups in security... hence it still has more security bugs, AND, they are unpatched (despite all the "Open 'SORES'" eyes poring over it, lol!)

    Fact, period!

    5th - In fact, Linux's kernel ALONE has 4x the # of unpatched bugs the ENTIRE SUITE/ARRAY OF WHAT MICROSOFT GIVES YOU TO DO BUSINESS & DEVELOPMENT WITH!

    Proof? Ok:

    This data's ALL from a respected source (secunia.com) for known security vulnerabilities unpatched:

    ---

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft SQL Server 2008: (11/27/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/21744/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Internet Information Services (IIS) 7.x: (11/27/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/17543/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 6 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Exchange Server 2010: (11/27/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/28234/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 0 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft SharePoint Server 2010: (11/27/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/29809/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 3 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Forefront Endpoint Protection 2010: (11/27/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/34343/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Baseline Security Analyzer 2.x: (11/27/2011):

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/6436/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 0 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Office 2010: (11/27/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/30529/?task=advisories

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 9 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Project 2010: (11/27/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/31177/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 0 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Windows Services for UNIX 3.x: (11/27/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/5244/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 3 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Internet Explorer 9.x: (11/27/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/34591/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 4 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft

  24. Disprove these documented facts then by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0 · on Linux Foundation Releases Document On UEFI Secure Boot

    1st - Linux also doesn't have as high quality drivers or as many because board makers KNOW what is "running the show/market " out there, Windows - so, they cater to it immensely!

    2nd - Nor does Linux have as many games, by FAR, either (this is mostly the home market in fact!)

    3rd - Not only that. but Linux, in its KERNEL ONLY mind you? Has 4x the unpatched security vulnerabilities Windows 7 has (which IS a complete "distro" with all of its parts, not just a kernel only)!

    4th - Despite all those "Open 'SORES'" eyes (most of whom couldn't code to SAVE THEIR LIVES mind you) allegedly poring over Linux code, how come it has that many more unpatched bugs than Windows 7 has, hmmm??

    Closed source is HARDER for hacker/crackers to attack as well, because you're stuck either disassembling it (especially tough with kernel level debuggers) OR fuzzing it, either is tougher than searching out problems in Linux, which you just load into a compiler & step trace its "Open 'SORES'" code with to find screwups in security... hence it still has more security bugs, AND, they are unpatched (despite all the "Open 'SORES'" eyes poring over it, lol!)

    Fact, period!

    5th - In fact, Linux's kernel ALONE has 4x the # of unpatched bugs the ENTIRE SUITE/ARRAY OF WHAT MICROSOFT GIVES YOU TO DO BUSINESS & DEVELOPMENT WITH!

    Proof? Ok:

    This data's ALL from a respected source (secunia.com) for known security vulnerabilities unpatched:

    ---

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft SQL Server 2008: (11/27/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/21744/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Internet Information Services (IIS) 7.x: (11/27/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/17543/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 6 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Exchange Server 2010: (11/27/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/28234/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 0 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft SharePoint Server 2010: (11/27/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/29809/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 3 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Forefront Endpoint Protection 2010: (11/27/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/34343/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Baseline Security Analyzer 2.x: (11/27/2011):

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/6436/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 0 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Office 2010: (11/27/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/30529/?task=advisories

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 9 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Project 2010: (11/27/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/31177/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 0 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Windows Services for UNIX 3.x: (11/27/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/5244/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 3 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Internet Explorer 9.x: (11/27/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/34591/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 4 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft

  25. You don't like facts from a reputable site? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0 · on Linux Foundation Releases Document On UEFI Secure Boot

    Too bad for you: SECUNIA.COM's specialty is posting the state of unpatched vs. patched security vulnerabilities (and it certainly shows a BOATLOAD MORE for Linux in its kernel alone, vs. nearly ALL of what Microsoft gives folks for business & development... period!).

    * To quote Jack Nicholson as Col. Jessup in "A few good men"? "YOU CAN'T HANDLE THE TRUTH!"

    APK

    P.S.=> And, that truth backed by a reputable security site in SECUNIA.COM, is this (once again, for your reference):

    ---

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft SQL Server 2008: (11/27/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/21744/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Internet Information Services (IIS) 7.x: (11/27/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/17543/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 6 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Exchange Server 2010: (11/27/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/28234/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 0 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft SharePoint Server 2010: (11/27/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/29809/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 3 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Forefront Endpoint Protection 2010: (11/27/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/34343/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Baseline Security Analyzer 2.x: (11/27/2011):

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/6436/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 0 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Office 2010: (11/27/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/30529/?task=advisories

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 9 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Project 2010: (11/27/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/31177/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 0 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Windows Services for UNIX 3.x: (11/27/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/5244/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 3 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Internet Explorer 9.x: (11/27/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/34591/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 4 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Virtual PC 2007: (11/27/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/14315/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Visual Studio 2010: (11/27/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/30853/?task=advisories

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 2 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft DirectX 10.x:
    (08/02/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/16896/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 3 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft .NET Framework 4.x
    (08/02/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/29592/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 8 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft

  26. You don't like facts from a reputable site? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0 · on Linux Foundation Releases Document On UEFI Secure Boot

    Too bad for you: SECUNIA.COM's specialty is posting the state of unpatched vs. patched security vulnerabilities (and it certainly shows a BOATLOAD MORE for Linux in its kernel alone, vs. nearly ALL of what Microsoft gives folks for business & development... period!).

    * To quote Jack Nicholson as Col. Jessup in "A few good men"? "YOU CAN'T HANDLE THE TRUTH!"

    APK

    P.S.=> And, that truth backed by a reputable security site in SECUNIA.COM, is this (once again, for your reference):

    ---

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft SQL Server 2008: (11/27/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/21744/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Internet Information Services (IIS) 7.x: (11/27/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/17543/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 6 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Exchange Server 2010: (11/27/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/28234/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 0 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft SharePoint Server 2010: (11/27/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/29809/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 3 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Forefront Endpoint Protection 2010: (11/27/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/34343/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Baseline Security Analyzer 2.x: (11/27/2011):

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/6436/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 0 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Office 2010: (11/27/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/30529/?task=advisories

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 9 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Project 2010: (11/27/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/31177/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 0 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Windows Services for UNIX 3.x: (11/27/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/5244/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 3 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Internet Explorer 9.x: (11/27/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/34591/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 4 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Virtual PC 2007: (11/27/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/14315/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Visual Studio 2010: (11/27/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/30853/?task=advisories

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 2 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft DirectX 10.x:
    (08/02/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/16896/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 3 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft .NET Framework 4.x
    (08/02/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/29592/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 8 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft

  27. You don't like facts from a reputable site? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0 · on Linux Foundation Releases Document On UEFI Secure Boot

    Too bad for you: SECUNIA.COM's specialty is posting the state of unpatched vs. patched security vulnerabilities (and it certainly shows a BOATLOAD MORE for Linux in its kernel alone, vs. nearly ALL of what Microsoft gives folks for business & development... period!).

    * To quote Jack Nicholson as Col. Jessup in "A few good men"? "YOU CAN'T HANDLE THE TRUTH!"

    APK

    P.S.=> And, that truth backed by a reputable security site in SECUNIA.COM, is this (once again, for your reference):

    ---

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft SQL Server 2008: (11/27/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/21744/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Internet Information Services (IIS) 7.x: (11/27/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/17543/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 6 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Exchange Server 2010: (11/27/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/28234/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 0 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft SharePoint Server 2010: (11/27/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/29809/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 3 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Forefront Endpoint Protection 2010: (11/27/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/34343/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Baseline Security Analyzer 2.x: (11/27/2011):

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/6436/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 0 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Office 2010: (11/27/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/30529/?task=advisories

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 9 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Project 2010: (11/27/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/31177/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 0 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Windows Services for UNIX 3.x: (11/27/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/5244/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 3 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Internet Explorer 9.x: (11/27/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/34591/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 4 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Virtual PC 2007: (11/27/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/14315/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Visual Studio 2010: (11/27/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/30853/?task=advisories

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 2 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft DirectX 10.x:
    (08/02/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/16896/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 3 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft .NET Framework 4.x
    (08/02/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/29592/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 8 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft

  28. You don't like facts from a reputable site? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0 · on Linux Foundation Releases Document On UEFI Secure Boot

    Too bad for you: SECUNIA.COM's specialty is posting the state of unpatched vs. patched security vulnerabilities (and it certainly shows a BOATLOAD MORE for Linux in its kernel alone, vs. nearly ALL of what Microsoft gives folks for business & development... period!).

    * To quote Jack Nicholson as Col. Jessup in "A few good men"? "YOU CAN'T HANDLE THE TRUTH!"

    APK

    P.S.=> And, that truth backed by a reputable security site in SECUNIA.COM, is this (once again, for your reference):

    ---

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft SQL Server 2008: (11/27/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/21744/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Internet Information Services (IIS) 7.x: (11/27/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/17543/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 6 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Exchange Server 2010: (11/27/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/28234/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 0 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft SharePoint Server 2010: (11/27/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/29809/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 3 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Forefront Endpoint Protection 2010: (11/27/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/34343/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Baseline Security Analyzer 2.x: (11/27/2011):

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/6436/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 0 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Office 2010: (11/27/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/30529/?task=advisories

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 9 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Project 2010: (11/27/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/31177/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 0 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Windows Services for UNIX 3.x: (11/27/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/5244/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 3 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Internet Explorer 9.x: (11/27/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/34591/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 4 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Virtual PC 2007: (11/27/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/14315/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Visual Studio 2010: (11/27/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/30853/?task=advisories

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 2 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft DirectX 10.x:
    (08/02/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/16896/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 3 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft .NET Framework 4.x
    (08/02/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/29592/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 8 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft

  29. You don't like facts from a reputable site? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0 · on Linux Foundation Releases Document On UEFI Secure Boot

    Too bad for you: SECUNIA.COM's specialty is posting the state of unpatched vs. patched security vulnerabilities (and it certainly shows a BOATLOAD MORE for Linux in its kernel alone, vs. nearly ALL of what Microsoft gives folks for business & development... period!).

    * To quote Jack Nicholson as Col. Jessup in "A few good men"? "YOU CAN'T HANDLE THE TRUTH!"

    APK

    P.S.=> And, that truth backed by a reputable security site in SECUNIA.COM, is this (once again, for your reference):

    ---

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft SQL Server 2008: (11/27/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/21744/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Internet Information Services (IIS) 7.x: (11/27/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/17543/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 6 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Exchange Server 2010: (11/27/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/28234/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 0 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft SharePoint Server 2010: (11/27/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/29809/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 3 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Forefront Endpoint Protection 2010: (11/27/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/34343/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Baseline Security Analyzer 2.x: (11/27/2011):

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/6436/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 0 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Office 2010: (11/27/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/30529/?task=advisories

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 9 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Project 2010: (11/27/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/31177/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 0 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Windows Services for UNIX 3.x: (11/27/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/5244/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 3 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Internet Explorer 9.x: (11/27/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/34591/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 4 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Virtual PC 2007: (11/27/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/14315/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Visual Studio 2010: (11/27/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/30853/?task=advisories

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 2 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft DirectX 10.x:
    (08/02/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/16896/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 3 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft .NET Framework 4.x
    (08/02/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/29592/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 8 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft

  30. You don't like facts from a reputable site? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0 · on Linux Foundation Releases Document On UEFI Secure Boot

    Too bad for you: SECUNIA.COM's specialty is posting the state of unpatched vs. patched security vulnerabilities (and it certainly shows a BOATLOAD MORE for Linux in its kernel alone, vs. nearly ALL of what Microsoft gives folks for business & development... period!).

    * To quote Jack Nicholson as Col. Jessup in "A few good men"? "YOU CAN'T HANDLE THE TRUTH!"

    APK

    P.S.=> And, that truth backed by a reputable security site in SECUNIA.COM, is this (once again, for your reference):

    ---

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft SQL Server 2008: (11/27/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/21744/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Internet Information Services (IIS) 7.x: (11/27/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/17543/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 6 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Exchange Server 2010: (11/27/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/28234/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 0 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft SharePoint Server 2010: (11/27/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/29809/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 3 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Forefront Endpoint Protection 2010: (11/27/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/34343/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Baseline Security Analyzer 2.x: (11/27/2011):

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/6436/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 0 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Office 2010: (11/27/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/30529/?task=advisories

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 9 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Project 2010: (11/27/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/31177/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 0 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Windows Services for UNIX 3.x: (11/27/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/5244/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 3 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Internet Explorer 9.x: (11/27/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/34591/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 4 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Virtual PC 2007: (11/27/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/14315/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Visual Studio 2010: (11/27/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/30853/?task=advisories

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 2 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft DirectX 10.x:
    (08/02/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/16896/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 3 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft .NET Framework 4.x
    (08/02/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/29592/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 8 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft

  31. You don't like facts from a reputable site? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0 · on Linux Foundation Releases Document On UEFI Secure Boot

    Too bad for you: SECUNIA.COM's specialty is posting the state of unpatched vs. patched security vulnerabilities (and it certainly shows a BOATLOAD MORE for Linux in its kernel alone, vs. nearly ALL of what Microsoft gives folks for business & development... period!).

    * To quote Jack Nicholson as Col. Jessup in "A few good men"? "YOU CAN'T HANDLE THE TRUTH!"

    APK

    P.S.=> And, that truth backed by a reputable security site in SECUNIA.COM, is this (once again, for your reference):

    ---

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft SQL Server 2008: (11/27/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/21744/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Internet Information Services (IIS) 7.x: (11/27/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/17543/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 6 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Exchange Server 2010: (11/27/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/28234/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 0 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft SharePoint Server 2010: (11/27/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/29809/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 3 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Forefront Endpoint Protection 2010: (11/27/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/34343/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Baseline Security Analyzer 2.x: (11/27/2011):

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/6436/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 0 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Office 2010: (11/27/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/30529/?task=advisories

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 9 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Project 2010: (11/27/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/31177/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 0 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Windows Services for UNIX 3.x: (11/27/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/5244/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 3 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Internet Explorer 9.x: (11/27/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/34591/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 4 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Virtual PC 2007: (11/27/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/14315/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Visual Studio 2010: (11/27/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/30853/?task=advisories

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 2 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft DirectX 10.x:
    (08/02/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/16896/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 3 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft .NET Framework 4.x
    (08/02/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/29592/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 8 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft

  32. You don't like facts from a reputable site? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0 · on Linux Foundation Releases Document On UEFI Secure Boot

    Too bad for you: SECUNIA.COM's specialty is posting the state of unpatched vs. patched security vulnerabilities (and it certainly shows a BOATLOAD MORE for Linux in its kernel alone, vs. nearly ALL of what Microsoft gives folks for business & development... period!).

    * To quote Jack Nicholson as Col. Jessup in "A few good men"? "YOU CAN'T HANDLE THE TRUTH!"

    APK

    P.S.=> And, that truth backed by a reputable security site in SECUNIA.COM, is this (once again, for your reference):

    ---

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft SQL Server 2008: (11/27/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/21744/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Internet Information Services (IIS) 7.x: (11/27/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/17543/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 6 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Exchange Server 2010: (11/27/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/28234/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 0 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft SharePoint Server 2010: (11/27/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/29809/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 3 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Forefront Endpoint Protection 2010: (11/27/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/34343/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Baseline Security Analyzer 2.x: (11/27/2011):

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/6436/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 0 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Office 2010: (11/27/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/30529/?task=advisories

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 9 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Project 2010: (11/27/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/31177/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 0 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Windows Services for UNIX 3.x: (11/27/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/5244/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 3 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Internet Explorer 9.x: (11/27/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/34591/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 4 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Virtual PC 2007: (11/27/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/14315/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Visual Studio 2010: (11/27/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/30853/?task=advisories

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 2 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft DirectX 10.x:
    (08/02/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/16896/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 3 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft .NET Framework 4.x
    (08/02/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/29592/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 8 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft

  33. You don't like facts from a reputable site? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0 · on Linux Foundation Releases Document On UEFI Secure Boot

    Too bad for you: SECUNIA.COM's specialty is posting the state of unpatched vs. patched security vulnerabilities (and it certainly shows a BOATLOAD MORE for Linux in its kernel alone, vs. nearly ALL of what Microsoft gives folks for business & development... period!).

    * To quote Jack Nicholson as Col. Jessup in "A few good men"? "YOU CAN'T HANDLE THE TRUTH!"

    APK

    P.S.=> And, that truth backed by a reputable security site in SECUNIA.COM, is this (once again, for your reference):

    ---

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft SQL Server 2008: (11/27/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/21744/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Internet Information Services (IIS) 7.x: (11/27/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/17543/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 6 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Exchange Server 2010: (11/27/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/28234/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 0 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft SharePoint Server 2010: (11/27/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/29809/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 3 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Forefront Endpoint Protection 2010: (11/27/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/34343/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Baseline Security Analyzer 2.x: (11/27/2011):

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/6436/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 0 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Office 2010: (11/27/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/30529/?task=advisories

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 9 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Project 2010: (11/27/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/31177/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 0 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Windows Services for UNIX 3.x: (11/27/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/5244/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 3 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Internet Explorer 9.x: (11/27/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/34591/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 4 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Virtual PC 2007: (11/27/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/14315/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Visual Studio 2010: (11/27/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/30853/?task=advisories

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 2 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft DirectX 10.x:
    (08/02/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/16896/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 3 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft .NET Framework 4.x
    (08/02/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/29592/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 8 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft

  34. You don't like facts from a reputable site? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0 · on Linux Foundation Releases Document On UEFI Secure Boot

    Too bad for you: SECUNIA.COM's specialty is posting the state of unpatched vs. patched security vulnerabilities (and it certainly shows a BOATLOAD MORE for Linux in its kernel alone, vs. nearly ALL of what Microsoft gives folks for business & development... period!).

    * To quote Jack Nicholson as Col. Jessup in "A few good men"? "YOU CAN'T HANDLE THE TRUTH!"

    APK

    P.S.=> And, that truth backed by a reputable security site in SECUNIA.COM, is this (once again, for your reference):

    ---

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft SQL Server 2008: (11/27/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/21744/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Internet Information Services (IIS) 7.x: (11/27/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/17543/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 6 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Exchange Server 2010: (11/27/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/28234/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 0 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft SharePoint Server 2010: (11/27/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/29809/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 3 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Forefront Endpoint Protection 2010: (11/27/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/34343/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Baseline Security Analyzer 2.x: (11/27/2011):

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/6436/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 0 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Office 2010: (11/27/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/30529/?task=advisories

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 9 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Project 2010: (11/27/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/31177/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 0 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Windows Services for UNIX 3.x: (11/27/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/5244/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 3 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Internet Explorer 9.x: (11/27/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/34591/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 4 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Virtual PC 2007: (11/27/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/14315/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Visual Studio 2010: (11/27/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/30853/?task=advisories

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 2 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft DirectX 10.x:
    (08/02/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/16896/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 3 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft .NET Framework 4.x
    (08/02/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/29592/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 8 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft

  35. You don't like facts from a reputable site? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0 · on Linux Foundation Releases Document On UEFI Secure Boot

    Too bad for you: SECUNIA.COM's specialty is posting the state of unpatched vs. patched security vulnerabilities (and it certainly shows a BOATLOAD MORE for Linux in its kernel alone, vs. nearly ALL of what Microsoft gives folks for business & development... period!).

    * To quote Jack Nicholson as Col. Jessup in "A few good men"? "YOU CAN'T HANDLE THE TRUTH!"

    APK

    P.S.=> And, that truth backed by a reputable security site in SECUNIA.COM, is this (once again, for your reference):

    ---

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft SQL Server 2008: (11/27/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/21744/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Internet Information Services (IIS) 7.x: (11/27/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/17543/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 6 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Exchange Server 2010: (11/27/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/28234/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 0 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft SharePoint Server 2010: (11/27/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/29809/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 3 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Forefront Endpoint Protection 2010: (11/27/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/34343/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Baseline Security Analyzer 2.x: (11/27/2011):

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/6436/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 0 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Office 2010: (11/27/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/30529/?task=advisories

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 9 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Project 2010: (11/27/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/31177/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 0 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Windows Services for UNIX 3.x: (11/27/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/5244/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 3 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Internet Explorer 9.x: (11/27/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/34591/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 4 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Virtual PC 2007: (11/27/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/14315/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Visual Studio 2010: (11/27/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/30853/?task=advisories

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 2 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft DirectX 10.x:
    (08/02/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/16896/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 3 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft .NET Framework 4.x
    (08/02/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/29592/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 8 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft

  36. You don't like facts from a reputable site? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0 · on Linux Foundation Releases Document On UEFI Secure Boot

    Too bad for you: SECUNIA.COM's specialty is posting the state of unpatched vs. patched security vulnerabilities (and it certainly shows a BOATLOAD MORE for Linux in its kernel alone, vs. nearly ALL of what Microsoft gives folks for business & development... period!).

    * To quote Jack Nicholson as Col. Jessup in "A few good men"? "YOU CAN'T HANDLE THE TRUTH!"

    APK

    P.S.=> And, that truth backed by a reputable security site in SECUNIA.COM, is this (once again, for your reference):

    ---

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft SQL Server 2008: (11/27/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/21744/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Internet Information Services (IIS) 7.x: (11/27/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/17543/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 6 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Exchange Server 2010: (11/27/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/28234/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 0 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft SharePoint Server 2010: (11/27/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/29809/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 3 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Forefront Endpoint Protection 2010: (11/27/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/34343/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Baseline Security Analyzer 2.x: (11/27/2011):

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/6436/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 0 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Office 2010: (11/27/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/30529/?task=advisories

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 9 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Project 2010: (11/27/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/31177/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 0 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Windows Services for UNIX 3.x: (11/27/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/5244/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 3 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Internet Explorer 9.x: (11/27/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/34591/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 4 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Virtual PC 2007: (11/27/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/14315/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Visual Studio 2010: (11/27/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/30853/?task=advisories

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 2 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft DirectX 10.x:
    (08/02/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/16896/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 3 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft .NET Framework 4.x
    (08/02/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/29592/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 8 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft

  37. You don't like facts from a reputable site? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0 · on Linux Foundation Releases Document On UEFI Secure Boot

    Too bad for you: SECUNIA.COM's specialty is posting the state of unpatched vs. patched security vulnerabilities (and it certainly shows a BOATLOAD MORE for Linux in its kernel alone, vs. nearly ALL of what Microsoft gives folks for business & development... period!).

    * To quote Jack Nicholson as Col. Jessup in "A few good men"? "YOU CAN'T HANDLE THE TRUTH!"

    APK

    P.S.=> And, that truth backed by a reputable security site in SECUNIA.COM, is this (once again, for your reference):

    ---

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft SQL Server 2008: (11/27/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/21744/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Internet Information Services (IIS) 7.x: (11/27/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/17543/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 6 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Exchange Server 2010: (11/27/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/28234/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 0 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft SharePoint Server 2010: (11/27/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/29809/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 3 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Forefront Endpoint Protection 2010: (11/27/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/34343/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Baseline Security Analyzer 2.x: (11/27/2011):

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/6436/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 0 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Office 2010: (11/27/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/30529/?task=advisories

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 9 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Project 2010: (11/27/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/31177/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 0 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Windows Services for UNIX 3.x: (11/27/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/5244/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 3 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Internet Explorer 9.x: (11/27/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/34591/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 4 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Virtual PC 2007: (11/27/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/14315/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Visual Studio 2010: (11/27/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/30853/?task=advisories

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 2 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft DirectX 10.x:
    (08/02/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/16896/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 3 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft .NET Framework 4.x
    (08/02/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/29592/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 8 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft

  38. You don't like facts from a reputable site? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0 · on Linux Foundation Releases Document On UEFI Secure Boot

    Too bad for you: SECUNIA.COM's specialty is posting the state of unpatched vs. patched security vulnerabilities (and it certainly shows a BOATLOAD MORE for Linux in its kernel alone, vs. nearly ALL of what Microsoft gives folks for business & development... period!).

    * To quote Jack Nicholson as Col. Jessup in "A few good men"? "YOU CAN'T HANDLE THE TRUTH!"

    APK

    P.S.=> And, that truth backed by a reputable security site in SECUNIA.COM, is this (once again, for your reference):

    ---

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft SQL Server 2008: (11/27/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/21744/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Internet Information Services (IIS) 7.x: (11/27/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/17543/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 6 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Exchange Server 2010: (11/27/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/28234/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 0 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft SharePoint Server 2010: (11/27/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/29809/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 3 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Forefront Endpoint Protection 2010: (11/27/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/34343/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Baseline Security Analyzer 2.x: (11/27/2011):

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/6436/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 0 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Office 2010: (11/27/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/30529/?task=advisories

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 9 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Project 2010: (11/27/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/31177/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 0 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Windows Services for UNIX 3.x: (11/27/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/5244/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 3 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Internet Explorer 9.x: (11/27/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/34591/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 4 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Virtual PC 2007: (11/27/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/14315/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Visual Studio 2010: (11/27/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/30853/?task=advisories

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 2 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft DirectX 10.x:
    (08/02/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/16896/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 3 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft .NET Framework 4.x
    (08/02/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/29592/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 8 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft

  39. Unpatched security vulnerabilities anyone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1 · on Linux Foundation Releases Document On UEFI Secure Boot

    Linux, in its KERNEL ONLY mind you, has 4x++ the unpatched security vulnerabilities Windows 7/Server 2008 have, AND UNPATCHED REMOTE ONES no less in Linux also (which Windows is also a complete "distro" with all of its parts, not just a kernel only - add on the other parts of Linux that come in a distro, you will get more)!

    In fact, Linux's kernel ALONE has 4x the # of unpatched bugs the ENTIRE SUITE/ARRAY OF WHAT MICROSOFT GIVES YOU TO DO BUSINESS & DEVELOPMENT WITH!

    This data's ALL from a respected source (secunia.com) for known security vulnerabilities unpatched:

    ---

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Windows 7: (11/27/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/27467/?task=advisories

    Unpatched 6% (5 of 85 Secunia advisories)

    OR

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Windows Server 2008: (11/27/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/18255/?task=advisories

    Unpatched 3% (4 of 153 Secunia advisories)

    * Nicest part here is, that the few unpatched vulns ALL have valid easy work arounds, or don't apply to workstations, or can be secured for (by turning off services you don't need, especially on desktops/workstations or by securing them down rights-wise)... can Linux say the same?

    Doubt it!

    PLUS, what REALLY causes malware outbreaks in Windows?? JAVA, & Adobe Products MOSTLY (99.8% in fact), per this:

    http://net-security.org/malware_news.php?id=1863

    & this:

    http://www.net-security.org/secworld.php?id=11759

    ---

    FACT - THAT'S 4x++ LESS UNPATCHED SECURITY VULNERABILITIES ON MS NEAR ENTIRE ARRAY OF WHAT THEY GIVE YOU FOR BUSINESS & DEVELOPMENT - see my p.s. below in fact on that note

    (& I know that LAMP can't say the same & tosses on even MORE errors into the mix for Linux)

    , THAN IS PRESENT ON THE LINUX 2.6x KERNEL ALONE!

    NOW- Toss on the rest of what goes into a Linux distro OR the "LAMP" stack, also (Linux, Apache, MySQL, PHP)?

    ?

    That # goes "up, Up, UP & AWAY...", bigime & even moreso, "increasing that lead, that Linux has", lol, in more unpatched known security bugs present that is (a dubious honor/win, lol, to say the least).

    So, that "all said & aside"?

    Compare a "*NIX/Open SORES" OS in Linux's "latest/greatest"?:

    ---

    Vulnerability Report: Linux Kernel 2.6.x (11/27/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/2719/?task=advisories

    Unpatched 6% (18 of 281 Secunia advisories)

    ---

    AND YES, there are 3 remotely vulnerable unpatched security problem outstanding in Linux there too, unpatched (despite all the "Open 'SORES' eyes" out there to fix it (yea, "right", not!))

    * Additionally/again - so it "sinks in":

    That's also more than the ENTIRE GAMUT of what MS gives folks to do business & build tools for it as well has & LAMP certainly cannot show less errors in unpatched security vulnerablities than 5 total from MS...

    In fact? LAMP is the favored attack for phishers & spammers:

    http://www.theregister.co.uk/2011/06/10/domains_lamped/

    ---

    PERTINENT QUOTE:

    "Phishers compromise LAMP-based websites for days at a time and hit the same victims over and over again, according to an Anti-Phishing Working Group survey.

    Sites built on Linux, Apache, MySQL and PHP are the favoured targets of phishing attackers,"

    ---

    Vulnerability Report: MySQL 5.x (11/27/2011):

  40. Unpatched security vulnerabilities anyone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1 · on Linux Foundation Releases Document On UEFI Secure Boot

    Linux, in its KERNEL ONLY mind you, has 4x++ the unpatched security vulnerabilities Windows 7/Server 2008 have, AND UNPATCHED REMOTE ONES no less in Linux also (which Windows is also a complete "distro" with all of its parts, not just a kernel only - add on the other parts of Linux that come in a distro, you will get more)!

    In fact, Linux's kernel ALONE has 4x the # of unpatched bugs the ENTIRE SUITE/ARRAY OF WHAT MICROSOFT GIVES YOU TO DO BUSINESS & DEVELOPMENT WITH!

    This data's ALL from a respected source (secunia.com) for known security vulnerabilities unpatched:

    ---

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Windows 7: (11/27/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/27467/?task=advisories

    Unpatched 6% (5 of 85 Secunia advisories)

    OR

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Windows Server 2008: (11/27/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/18255/?task=advisories

    Unpatched 3% (4 of 153 Secunia advisories)

    * Nicest part here is, that the few unpatched vulns ALL have valid easy work arounds, or don't apply to workstations, or can be secured for (by turning off services you don't need, especially on desktops/workstations or by securing them down rights-wise)... can Linux say the same?

    Doubt it!

    PLUS, what REALLY causes malware outbreaks in Windows?? JAVA, & Adobe Products MOSTLY (99.8% in fact), per this:

    http://net-security.org/malware_news.php?id=1863

    & this:

    http://www.net-security.org/secworld.php?id=11759

    ---

    FACT - THAT'S 4x++ LESS UNPATCHED SECURITY VULNERABILITIES ON MS NEAR ENTIRE ARRAY OF WHAT THEY GIVE YOU FOR BUSINESS & DEVELOPMENT - see my p.s. below in fact on that note

    (& I know that LAMP can't say the same & tosses on even MORE errors into the mix for Linux)

    , THAN IS PRESENT ON THE LINUX 2.6x KERNEL ALONE!

    NOW- Toss on the rest of what goes into a Linux distro OR the "LAMP" stack, also (Linux, Apache, MySQL, PHP)?

    ?

    That # goes "up, Up, UP & AWAY...", bigime & even moreso, "increasing that lead, that Linux has", lol, in more unpatched known security bugs present that is (a dubious honor/win, lol, to say the least).

    So, that "all said & aside"?

    Compare a "*NIX/Open SORES" OS in Linux's "latest/greatest"?:

    ---

    Vulnerability Report: Linux Kernel 2.6.x (11/27/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/2719/?task=advisories

    Unpatched 6% (18 of 281 Secunia advisories)

    ---

    AND YES, there are 3 remotely vulnerable unpatched security problem outstanding in Linux there too, unpatched (despite all the "Open 'SORES' eyes" out there to fix it (yea, "right", not!))

    * Additionally/again - so it "sinks in":

    That's also more than the ENTIRE GAMUT of what MS gives folks to do business & build tools for it as well has & LAMP certainly cannot show less errors in unpatched security vulnerablities than 5 total from MS...

    In fact? LAMP is the favored attack for phishers & spammers:

    http://www.theregister.co.uk/2011/06/10/domains_lamped/

    ---

    PERTINENT QUOTE:

    "Phishers compromise LAMP-based websites for days at a time and hit the same victims over and over again, according to an Anti-Phishing Working Group survey.

    Sites built on Linux, Apache, MySQL and PHP are the favoured targets of phishing attackers,"

    ---

    Vulnerability Report: MySQL 5.x (11/27/2011):

  41. Unpatched security vulnerabilities anyone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1 · on Linux Foundation Releases Document On UEFI Secure Boot

    Linux, in its KERNEL ONLY mind you, has 4x++ the unpatched security vulnerabilities Windows 7/Server 2008 have, AND UNPATCHED REMOTE ONES no less in Linux also (which Windows is also a complete "distro" with all of its parts, not just a kernel only - add on the other parts of Linux that come in a distro, you will get more)!

    In fact, Linux's kernel ALONE has 4x the # of unpatched bugs the ENTIRE SUITE/ARRAY OF WHAT MICROSOFT GIVES YOU TO DO BUSINESS & DEVELOPMENT WITH!

    This data's ALL from a respected source (secunia.com) for known security vulnerabilities unpatched:

    ---

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Windows 7: (11/27/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/27467/?task=advisories

    Unpatched 6% (5 of 85 Secunia advisories)

    OR

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Windows Server 2008: (11/27/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/18255/?task=advisories

    Unpatched 3% (4 of 153 Secunia advisories)

    * Nicest part here is, that the few unpatched vulns ALL have valid easy work arounds, or don't apply to workstations, or can be secured for (by turning off services you don't need, especially on desktops/workstations or by securing them down rights-wise)... can Linux say the same?

    Doubt it!

    PLUS, what REALLY causes malware outbreaks in Windows?? JAVA, & Adobe Products MOSTLY (99.8% in fact), per this:

    http://net-security.org/malware_news.php?id=1863

    & this:

    http://www.net-security.org/secworld.php?id=11759

    ---

    FACT - THAT'S 4x++ LESS UNPATCHED SECURITY VULNERABILITIES ON MS NEAR ENTIRE ARRAY OF WHAT THEY GIVE YOU FOR BUSINESS & DEVELOPMENT - see my p.s. below in fact on that note

    (& I know that LAMP can't say the same & tosses on even MORE errors into the mix for Linux)

    , THAN IS PRESENT ON THE LINUX 2.6x KERNEL ALONE!

    NOW- Toss on the rest of what goes into a Linux distro OR the "LAMP" stack, also (Linux, Apache, MySQL, PHP)?

    ?

    That # goes "up, Up, UP & AWAY...", bigime & even moreso, "increasing that lead, that Linux has", lol, in more unpatched known security bugs present that is (a dubious honor/win, lol, to say the least).

    So, that "all said & aside"?

    Compare a "*NIX/Open SORES" OS in Linux's "latest/greatest"?:

    ---

    Vulnerability Report: Linux Kernel 2.6.x (11/27/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/2719/?task=advisories

    Unpatched 6% (18 of 281 Secunia advisories)

    ---

    AND YES, there are 3 remotely vulnerable unpatched security problem outstanding in Linux there too, unpatched (despite all the "Open 'SORES' eyes" out there to fix it (yea, "right", not!))

    * Additionally/again - so it "sinks in":

    That's also more than the ENTIRE GAMUT of what MS gives folks to do business & build tools for it as well has & LAMP certainly cannot show less errors in unpatched security vulnerablities than 5 total from MS...

    In fact? LAMP is the favored attack for phishers & spammers:

    http://www.theregister.co.uk/2011/06/10/domains_lamped/

    ---

    PERTINENT QUOTE:

    "Phishers compromise LAMP-based websites for days at a time and hit the same victims over and over again, according to an Anti-Phishing Working Group survey.

    Sites built on Linux, Apache, MySQL and PHP are the favoured targets of phishing attackers,"

    ---

    Vulnerability Report: MySQL 5.x (11/27/2011):

  42. Why are there 4x more unpatched by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0 · on Microsoft Finalizes Skype Acquisition

    Known security bugs in Linux's kernel alone (3 remote ones no less) in Linux's kernel alone than there is in nearly all of what MS offers companies, users, and developers to do business with, which is a lot more than an OS kernel (I am talking Windows Server 2008, IIS7, SQLServer 2008, Office 2010, & more, which have less unpatched bugs in them than the Linux kernel alone (which if you put on Apache, MySQL, PHP, plus the rest of what's in a Linux distro alone which has security bugs unpatched too. making it even worse than 4 times the bugs already the kernel alone has versus all of what MS gives you)?

    Tell us about the FINE "security" in ANDROID (a Linux itself), won't you?? Truckloads of malware seems to operate there (in an area linux finally was shown it gets used a bit more than most other competitors showing Linux was just getting security by obscurity).

    You obviously know zero about security in Windows, because one can do the same types of things in NTFS, registry, or other permissions as you noted in Linux (which bit off of the ACL model via SeLinux MAC copy of it, you dumb ass).

    A little newsflash since you mentioned goverments and stock exchanges: NASDAQ has for example been using Windows Server 2003 + SQLServer 2005 for nonstop clustered solid uptime into nearly a decade solid now as their "official trade data dissemination system". While literally only the other day, NYSE running Linux iirc, got floored http://www.californiality.com/2011/10/anonymous-nyse-attack-shocker.html

    Now, let's also look at Linux at LSE (London Stock Exchange), which as you know (lol), LINUX FELL FLAT ON ITS FACE 2x the FIRST 2 DAYS IT RAN THERE, and this:

    London Stock Exchange Web Site Serving Malware:

    http://www.securityweek.com/london-stock-exchange-web-site-serving-malware

    (Please, do tell us another one like this from you "firstly Linux is more secure than m$" to make us LAUGH @ YOU SOME MORE please, along with the fact that you're full of it. You can't pay for this kind of humor.)

    This data's ALL from a respected source (secunia.com) for known security vulnerabilities unpatched:

    ---

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft SQL Server 2008: (10/11/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/21744/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Internet Information Services (IIS) 7.x: (10/11/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/17543/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 6 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Exchange Server 2010: (10/11/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/28234/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 0 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft SharePoint Server 2010: (10/11/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/29809/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 3 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Forefront Endpoint Protection 2010: (10/11/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/34343/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Baseline Security Analyzer 2.x: (10/11/2011):

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/6436/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 0 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Office 2010: (10/11/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/30529/?task=advisories

    Unpatched 0

  43. Why are there 4x more unpatched by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0 · on Microsoft Finalizes Skype Acquisition

    Known security bugs in Linux's kernel alone (3 remote ones no less) in Linux's kernel alone than there is in nearly all of what MS offers companies, users, and developers to do business with, which is a lot more than an OS kernel (I am talking Windows Server 2008, IIS7, SQLServer 2008, Office 2010, & more, which have less unpatched bugs in them than the Linux kernel alone (which if you put on Apache, MySQL, PHP, plus the rest of what's in a Linux distro alone which has security bugs unpatched too. making it even worse than 4 times the bugs already the kernel alone has versus all of what MS gives you)?

    Tell us about the FINE "security" in ANDROID (a Linux itself), won't you?? Truckloads of malware seems to operate there (in an area linux finally was shown it gets used a bit more than most other competitors showing Linux was just getting security by obscurity).

    You obviously know zero about security in Windows, because one can do the same types of things in NTFS, registry, or other permissions as you noted in Linux (which bit off of the ACL model via SeLinux MAC copy of it, you dumb ass).

    A little newsflash since you mentioned goverments and stock exchanges: NASDAQ has for example been using Windows Server 2003 + SQLServer 2005 for nonstop clustered solid uptime into nearly a decade solid now as their "official trade data dissemination system". While literally only the other day, NYSE running Linux iirc, got floored http://www.californiality.com/2011/10/anonymous-nyse-attack-shocker.html

    Now, let's also look at Linux at LSE (London Stock Exchange), which as you know (lol), LINUX FELL FLAT ON ITS FACE 2x the FIRST 2 DAYS IT RAN THERE, and this:

    London Stock Exchange Web Site Serving Malware:

    http://www.securityweek.com/london-stock-exchange-web-site-serving-malware

    (Please, do tell us another one like this from you "firstly Linux is more secure than m$" to make us LAUGH @ YOU SOME MORE please, along with the fact that you're full of it. You can't pay for this kind of humor.)

    This data's ALL from a respected source (secunia.com) for known security vulnerabilities unpatched:

    ---

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft SQL Server 2008: (10/11/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/21744/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Internet Information Services (IIS) 7.x: (10/11/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/17543/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 6 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Exchange Server 2010: (10/11/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/28234/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 0 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft SharePoint Server 2010: (10/11/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/29809/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 3 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Forefront Endpoint Protection 2010: (10/11/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/34343/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Baseline Security Analyzer 2.x: (10/11/2011):

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/6436/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 0 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Office 2010: (10/11/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/30529/?task=advisories

    Unpatched 0

  44. Why are there 4x more unpatched by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0 · on Microsoft Finalizes Skype Acquisition

    Known security bugs in Linux's kernel alone (3 remote ones no less) in Linux's kernel alone than there is in nearly all of what MS offers companies, users, and developers to do business with, which is a lot more than an OS kernel (I am talking Windows Server 2008, IIS7, SQLServer 2008, Office 2010, & more, which have less unpatched bugs in them than the Linux kernel alone (which if you put on Apache, MySQL, PHP, plus the rest of what's in a Linux distro alone which has security bugs unpatched too. making it even worse than 4 times the bugs already the kernel alone has versus all of what MS gives you)?

    Tell us about the FINE "security" in ANDROID (a Linux itself), won't you?? Truckloads of malware seems to operate there (in an area linux finally was shown it gets used a bit more than most other competitors showing Linux was just getting security by obscurity).

    You obviously know zero about security in Windows, because one can do the same types of things in NTFS, registry, or other permissions as you noted in Linux (which bit off of the ACL model via SeLinux MAC copy of it, you dumb ass).

    A little newsflash since you mentioned goverments and stock exchanges: NASDAQ has for example been using Windows Server 2003 + SQLServer 2005 for nonstop clustered solid uptime into nearly a decade solid now as their "official trade data dissemination system". While literally only the other day, NYSE running Linux iirc, got floored http://www.californiality.com/2011/10/anonymous-nyse-attack-shocker.html

    Now, let's also look at Linux at LSE (London Stock Exchange), which as you know (lol), LINUX FELL FLAT ON ITS FACE 2x the FIRST 2 DAYS IT RAN THERE, and this:

    London Stock Exchange Web Site Serving Malware:

    http://www.securityweek.com/london-stock-exchange-web-site-serving-malware

    (Please, do tell us another one like this from you "firstly Linux is more secure than m$" to make us LAUGH @ YOU SOME MORE please, along with the fact that you're full of it. You can't pay for this kind of humor.)

    This data's ALL from a respected source (secunia.com) for known security vulnerabilities unpatched:

    ---

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft SQL Server 2008: (10/11/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/21744/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Internet Information Services (IIS) 7.x: (10/11/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/17543/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 6 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Exchange Server 2010: (10/11/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/28234/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 0 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft SharePoint Server 2010: (10/11/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/29809/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 3 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Forefront Endpoint Protection 2010: (10/11/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/34343/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Baseline Security Analyzer 2.x: (10/11/2011):

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/6436/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 0 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Office 2010: (10/11/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/30529/?task=advisories

    Unpatched 0

  45. Why are there 4x more unpatched by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0 · on Microsoft Finalizes Skype Acquisition

    Known security bugs in Linux's kernel alone (3 remote ones no less) in Linux's kernel alone than there is in nearly all of what MS offers companies, users, and developers to do business with, which is a lot more than an OS kernel (I am talking Windows Server 2008, IIS7, SQLServer 2008, Office 2010, & more, which have less unpatched bugs in them than the Linux kernel alone (which if you put on Apache, MySQL, PHP, plus the rest of what's in a Linux distro alone which has security bugs unpatched too. making it even worse than 4 times the bugs already the kernel alone has versus all of what MS gives you)?

    Tell us about the FINE "security" in ANDROID (a Linux itself), won't you?? Truckloads of malware seems to operate there (in an area linux finally was shown it gets used a bit more than most other competitors showing Linux was just getting security by obscurity).

    You obviously know zero about security in Windows, because one can do the same types of things in NTFS, registry, or other permissions as you noted in Linux (which bit off of the ACL model via SeLinux MAC copy of it, you dumb ass).

    A little newsflash since you mentioned goverments and stock exchanges: NASDAQ has for example been using Windows Server 2003 + SQLServer 2005 for nonstop clustered solid uptime into nearly a decade solid now as their "official trade data dissemination system". While literally only the other day, NYSE running Linux iirc, got floored http://www.californiality.com/2011/10/anonymous-nyse-attack-shocker.html

    Now, let's also look at Linux at LSE (London Stock Exchange), which as you know (lol), LINUX FELL FLAT ON ITS FACE 2x the FIRST 2 DAYS IT RAN THERE, and this:

    London Stock Exchange Web Site Serving Malware:

    http://www.securityweek.com/london-stock-exchange-web-site-serving-malware

    (Please, do tell us another one like this from you "firstly Linux is more secure than m$" to make us LAUGH @ YOU SOME MORE please, along with the fact that you're full of it. You can't pay for this kind of humor.)

    This data's ALL from a respected source (secunia.com) for known security vulnerabilities unpatched:

    ---

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft SQL Server 2008: (10/11/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/21744/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Internet Information Services (IIS) 7.x: (10/11/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/17543/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 6 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Exchange Server 2010: (10/11/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/28234/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 0 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft SharePoint Server 2010: (10/11/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/29809/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 3 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Forefront Endpoint Protection 2010: (10/11/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/34343/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Baseline Security Analyzer 2.x: (10/11/2011):

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/6436/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 0 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Office 2010: (10/11/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/30529/?task=advisories

    Unpatched 0

  46. Why are there 4x more unpatched by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0 · on Microsoft Finalizes Skype Acquisition

    Known security bugs in Linux's kernel alone (3 remote ones no less) in Linux's kernel alone than there is in nearly all of what MS offers companies, users, and developers to do business with, which is a lot more than an OS kernel (I am talking Windows Server 2008, IIS7, SQLServer 2008, Office 2010, & more, which have less unpatched bugs in them than the Linux kernel alone (which if you put on Apache, MySQL, PHP, plus the rest of what's in a Linux distro alone which has security bugs unpatched too. making it even worse than 4 times the bugs already the kernel alone has versus all of what MS gives you)?

    Tell us about the FINE "security" in ANDROID (a Linux itself), won't you?? Truckloads of malware seems to operate there (in an area linux finally was shown it gets used a bit more than most other competitors showing Linux was just getting security by obscurity).

    You obviously know zero about security in Windows, because one can do the same types of things in NTFS, registry, or other permissions as you noted in Linux (which bit off of the ACL model via SeLinux MAC copy of it, you dumb ass).

    A little newsflash since you mentioned goverments and stock exchanges: NASDAQ has for example been using Windows Server 2003 + SQLServer 2005 for nonstop clustered solid uptime into nearly a decade solid now as their "official trade data dissemination system". While literally only the other day, NYSE running Linux iirc, got floored http://www.californiality.com/2011/10/anonymous-nyse-attack-shocker.html

    Now, let's also look at Linux at LSE (London Stock Exchange), which as you know (lol), LINUX FELL FLAT ON ITS FACE 2x the FIRST 2 DAYS IT RAN THERE, and this:

    London Stock Exchange Web Site Serving Malware:

    http://www.securityweek.com/london-stock-exchange-web-site-serving-malware

    (Please, do tell us another one like this from you "firstly Linux is more secure than m$" to make us LAUGH @ YOU SOME MORE please, along with the fact that you're full of it. You can't pay for this kind of humor.)

    This data's ALL from a respected source (secunia.com) for known security vulnerabilities unpatched:

    ---

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft SQL Server 2008: (10/11/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/21744/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Internet Information Services (IIS) 7.x: (10/11/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/17543/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 6 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Exchange Server 2010: (10/11/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/28234/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 0 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft SharePoint Server 2010: (10/11/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/29809/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 3 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Forefront Endpoint Protection 2010: (10/11/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/34343/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Baseline Security Analyzer 2.x: (10/11/2011):

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/6436/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 0 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Office 2010: (10/11/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/30529/?task=advisories

    Unpatched 0

  47. Why are there 4x more unpatched by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0 · on Microsoft Finalizes Skype Acquisition

    Known security bugs in Linux's kernel alone (3 remote ones no less) in Linux's kernel alone than there is in nearly all of what MS offers companies, users, and developers to do business with, which is a lot more than an OS kernel (I am talking Windows Server 2008, IIS7, SQLServer 2008, Office 2010, & more, which have less unpatched bugs in them than the Linux kernel alone (which if you put on Apache, MySQL, PHP, plus the rest of what's in a Linux distro alone which has security bugs unpatched too. making it even worse than 4 times the bugs already the kernel alone has versus all of what MS gives you)?

    Tell us about the FINE "security" in ANDROID (a Linux itself), won't you?? Truckloads of malware seems to operate there (in an area linux finally was shown it gets used a bit more than most other competitors showing Linux was just getting security by obscurity).

    You obviously know zero about security in Windows, because one can do the same types of things in NTFS, registry, or other permissions as you noted in Linux (which bit off of the ACL model via SeLinux MAC copy of it, you dumb ass).

    A little newsflash since you mentioned goverments and stock exchanges: NASDAQ has for example been using Windows Server 2003 + SQLServer 2005 for nonstop clustered solid uptime into nearly a decade solid now as their "official trade data dissemination system". While literally only the other day, NYSE running Linux iirc, got floored http://www.californiality.com/2011/10/anonymous-nyse-attack-shocker.html

    Now, let's also look at Linux at LSE (London Stock Exchange), which as you know (lol), LINUX FELL FLAT ON ITS FACE 2x the FIRST 2 DAYS IT RAN THERE, and this:

    London Stock Exchange Web Site Serving Malware:

    http://www.securityweek.com/london-stock-exchange-web-site-serving-malware

    (Please, do tell us another one like this from you "firstly Linux is more secure than m$" to make us LAUGH @ YOU SOME MORE please, along with the fact that you're full of it. You can't pay for this kind of humor.)

    This data's ALL from a respected source (secunia.com) for known security vulnerabilities unpatched:

    ---

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft SQL Server 2008: (10/11/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/21744/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Internet Information Services (IIS) 7.x: (10/11/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/17543/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 6 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Exchange Server 2010: (10/11/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/28234/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 0 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft SharePoint Server 2010: (10/11/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/29809/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 3 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Forefront Endpoint Protection 2010: (10/11/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/34343/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Baseline Security Analyzer 2.x: (10/11/2011):

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/6436/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 0 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Office 2010: (10/11/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/30529/?task=advisories

    Unpatched 0

  48. Why are there 4x more unpatched by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0 · on Microsoft Finalizes Skype Acquisition

    Known security bugs in Linux's kernel alone (3 remote ones no less) in Linux's kernel alone than there is in nearly all of what MS offers companies, users, and developers to do business with, which is a lot more than an OS kernel (I am talking Windows Server 2008, IIS7, SQLServer 2008, Office 2010, & more, which have less unpatched bugs in them than the Linux kernel alone (which if you put on Apache, MySQL, PHP, plus the rest of what's in a Linux distro alone which has security bugs unpatched too. making it even worse than 4 times the bugs already the kernel alone has versus all of what MS gives you)?

    Tell us about the FINE "security" in ANDROID (a Linux itself), won't you?? Truckloads of malware seems to operate there (in an area linux finally was shown it gets used a bit more than most other competitors showing Linux was just getting security by obscurity).

    You obviously know zero about security in Windows, because one can do the same types of things in NTFS, registry, or other permissions as you noted in Linux (which bit off of the ACL model via SeLinux MAC copy of it, you dumb ass).

    A little newsflash since you mentioned goverments and stock exchanges: NASDAQ has for example been using Windows Server 2003 + SQLServer 2005 for nonstop clustered solid uptime into nearly a decade solid now as their "official trade data dissemination system". While literally only the other day, NYSE running Linux iirc, got floored http://www.californiality.com/2011/10/anonymous-nyse-attack-shocker.html

    Now, let's also look at Linux at LSE (London Stock Exchange), which as you know (lol), LINUX FELL FLAT ON ITS FACE 2x the FIRST 2 DAYS IT RAN THERE, and this:

    London Stock Exchange Web Site Serving Malware:

    http://www.securityweek.com/london-stock-exchange-web-site-serving-malware

    (Please, do tell us another one like this from you "firstly Linux is more secure than m$" to make us LAUGH @ YOU SOME MORE please, along with the fact that you're full of it. You can't pay for this kind of humor.)

    This data's ALL from a respected source (secunia.com) for known security vulnerabilities unpatched:

    ---

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft SQL Server 2008: (10/11/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/21744/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Internet Information Services (IIS) 7.x: (10/11/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/17543/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 6 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Exchange Server 2010: (10/11/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/28234/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 0 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft SharePoint Server 2010: (10/11/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/29809/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 3 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Forefront Endpoint Protection 2010: (10/11/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/34343/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Baseline Security Analyzer 2.x: (10/11/2011):

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/6436/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 0 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Office 2010: (10/11/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/30529/?task=advisories

    Unpatched 0

  49. Security vulnerabilities unpatched by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0 · on Kernel Bug Means Linux Power Usage Remains High

    1st - Linux also doesn't have as high quality drivers or as many because board makers KNOW what is "running the show/market " out there, Windows - so, they cater to it immensely!

    2nd - Nor does Linux have as many games, by FAR, either (this is mostly the home market in fact!)

    3rd - Not only that. but Linux, in its KERNEL ONLY mind you? Has 4x the unpatched security vulnerabilities Windows 7 has (which IS a complete "distro" with all of its parts, not just a kernel only)!

    4th - Despite all those "Open 'SORES'" eyes (most of whom couldn't code to SAVE THEIR LIVES mind you) allegedly poring over Linux code, how come it has that many more unpatched bugs than Windows 7 has, hmmm??

    Closed source is HARDER for hacker/crackers to attack as well, because you're stuck either disassembling it (especially tough with kernel level debuggers) OR fuzzing it, either is tougher than searching out problems in Linux, which you just load into a compiler & step trace its "Open 'SORES'" code with to find screwups in security... hence it still has more security bugs, AND, they are unpatched (despite all the "Open 'SORES'" eyes poring over it, lol!)

    Fact, period!

    5th - In fact, Linux's kernel ALONE has 4x the # of unpatched bugs the ENTIRE SUITE/ARRAY OF WHAT MICROSOFT GIVES YOU TO DO BUSINESS & DEVELOPMENT WITH!

    Proof? Ok:

    This data's ALL from a respected source (secunia.com) for known security vulnerabilities unpatched:

    ---

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft SQL Server 2008: (10/11/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/21744/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Internet Information Services (IIS) 7.x: (10/11/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/17543/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 6 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Exchange Server 2010: (10/11/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/28234/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 0 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft SharePoint Server 2010: (10/11/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/29809/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 3 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Forefront Endpoint Protection 2010: (10/11/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/34343/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Baseline Security Analyzer 2.x: (10/11/2011):

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/6436/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 0 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Office 2010: (10/11/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/30529/?task=advisories

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 9 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Project 2010: (10/11/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/31177/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 0 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Windows Services for UNIX 3.x: (10/11/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/5244/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 3 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Internet Explorer 9.x: (10/11/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/34591/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 3 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft

  50. Security vulnerabilities unpatched by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0 · on Kernel Bug Means Linux Power Usage Remains High

    1st - Linux also doesn't have as high quality drivers or as many because board makers KNOW what is "running the show/market " out there, Windows - so, they cater to it immensely!

    2nd - Nor does Linux have as many games, by FAR, either (this is mostly the home market in fact!)

    3rd - Not only that. but Linux, in its KERNEL ONLY mind you? Has 4x the unpatched security vulnerabilities Windows 7 has (which IS a complete "distro" with all of its parts, not just a kernel only)!

    4th - Despite all those "Open 'SORES'" eyes (most of whom couldn't code to SAVE THEIR LIVES mind you) allegedly poring over Linux code, how come it has that many more unpatched bugs than Windows 7 has, hmmm??

    Closed source is HARDER for hacker/crackers to attack as well, because you're stuck either disassembling it (especially tough with kernel level debuggers) OR fuzzing it, either is tougher than searching out problems in Linux, which you just load into a compiler & step trace its "Open 'SORES'" code with to find screwups in security... hence it still has more security bugs, AND, they are unpatched (despite all the "Open 'SORES'" eyes poring over it, lol!)

    Fact, period!

    5th - In fact, Linux's kernel ALONE has 4x the # of unpatched bugs the ENTIRE SUITE/ARRAY OF WHAT MICROSOFT GIVES YOU TO DO BUSINESS & DEVELOPMENT WITH!

    Proof? Ok:

    This data's ALL from a respected source (secunia.com) for known security vulnerabilities unpatched:

    ---

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft SQL Server 2008: (10/11/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/21744/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Internet Information Services (IIS) 7.x: (10/11/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/17543/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 6 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Exchange Server 2010: (10/11/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/28234/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 0 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft SharePoint Server 2010: (10/11/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/29809/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 3 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Forefront Endpoint Protection 2010: (10/11/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/34343/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Baseline Security Analyzer 2.x: (10/11/2011):

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/6436/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 0 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Office 2010: (10/11/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/30529/?task=advisories

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 9 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Project 2010: (10/11/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/31177/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 0 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Windows Services for UNIX 3.x: (10/11/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/5244/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 3 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Internet Explorer 9.x: (10/11/2011)

    http://secunia.com/advisories/product/34591/

    Unpatched 0% (0 of 3 Secunia advisories)

    Vulnerability Report: Microsoft