Domain: theborgmatrix.com
Stories and comments across the archive that link to theborgmatrix.com.
Comments · 9
-
Re:Climate has never stayed constant
-
Re: Follow the lead of the USA
"facts win"
AGW->probably all Bullshit
http://forumslide.theborgmatri... -
Re: Cannot be climate change
did you really just ask what has the noaa estimates of sea levels and ice ages over the last 800000 years got to do with the sea levels 10,000 years ago.... sorry can't help you. try googling "sea level history"
or read my full story
http://forumslide.theborgmatri... -
Re: Cannot be climate change
And thanks, now archived for the ages.
http://forumslide.theborgmatri... -
Re: Cannot be climate change
->The best numbers? I bet you're the smartest guy you know. I bet your IQ is huge.
For someone who isn't a climatologist, pretty happy, yes.
Some of the graphs are still up.
Raw Data
http://www.theborgmatrix.com/g...
Fitting it to a curve to get average temperature
http://www.theborgmatrix.com/g...
Using that to fill in the missing data
http://www.theborgmatrix.com/g...
Using that to estimate the change in tilt of the earth (further north = higher temp - the white spots in the previous image)
http://www.theborgmatrix.com/g...->I want you to know that sentences like that make it very hard to trust your intelligence
I want you to know I almost care.->Wait, did I just read that you're discounting a measurable change over decades because the yearly rate
Nope
discounting a rate because the measurements are
10-12,8-13,10-13,9-20
There is no provable pattern there, even though the average goes from 11 to ~15.->WHAT? What the flying fuck does this have to do with the error margins on contemporary readings!?
see graph "raw data". not having the coldest readings biases the data very badly. -
Re: Cannot be climate change
->The best numbers? I bet you're the smartest guy you know. I bet your IQ is huge.
For someone who isn't a climatologist, pretty happy, yes.
Some of the graphs are still up.
Raw Data
http://www.theborgmatrix.com/g...
Fitting it to a curve to get average temperature
http://www.theborgmatrix.com/g...
Using that to fill in the missing data
http://www.theborgmatrix.com/g...
Using that to estimate the change in tilt of the earth (further north = higher temp - the white spots in the previous image)
http://www.theborgmatrix.com/g...->I want you to know that sentences like that make it very hard to trust your intelligence
I want you to know I almost care.->Wait, did I just read that you're discounting a measurable change over decades because the yearly rate
Nope
discounting a rate because the measurements are
10-12,8-13,10-13,9-20
There is no provable pattern there, even though the average goes from 11 to ~15.->WHAT? What the flying fuck does this have to do with the error margins on contemporary readings!?
see graph "raw data". not having the coldest readings biases the data very badly. -
Re: Cannot be climate change
->The best numbers? I bet you're the smartest guy you know. I bet your IQ is huge.
For someone who isn't a climatologist, pretty happy, yes.
Some of the graphs are still up.
Raw Data
http://www.theborgmatrix.com/g...
Fitting it to a curve to get average temperature
http://www.theborgmatrix.com/g...
Using that to fill in the missing data
http://www.theborgmatrix.com/g...
Using that to estimate the change in tilt of the earth (further north = higher temp - the white spots in the previous image)
http://www.theborgmatrix.com/g...->I want you to know that sentences like that make it very hard to trust your intelligence
I want you to know I almost care.->Wait, did I just read that you're discounting a measurable change over decades because the yearly rate
Nope
discounting a rate because the measurements are
10-12,8-13,10-13,9-20
There is no provable pattern there, even though the average goes from 11 to ~15.->WHAT? What the flying fuck does this have to do with the error margins on contemporary readings!?
see graph "raw data". not having the coldest readings biases the data very badly. -
Re: Cannot be climate change
->The best numbers? I bet you're the smartest guy you know. I bet your IQ is huge.
For someone who isn't a climatologist, pretty happy, yes.
Some of the graphs are still up.
Raw Data
http://www.theborgmatrix.com/g...
Fitting it to a curve to get average temperature
http://www.theborgmatrix.com/g...
Using that to fill in the missing data
http://www.theborgmatrix.com/g...
Using that to estimate the change in tilt of the earth (further north = higher temp - the white spots in the previous image)
http://www.theborgmatrix.com/g...->I want you to know that sentences like that make it very hard to trust your intelligence
I want you to know I almost care.->Wait, did I just read that you're discounting a measurable change over decades because the yearly rate
Nope
discounting a rate because the measurements are
10-12,8-13,10-13,9-20
There is no provable pattern there, even though the average goes from 11 to ~15.->WHAT? What the flying fuck does this have to do with the error margins on contemporary readings!?
see graph "raw data". not having the coldest readings biases the data very badly. -
Re:Has nothing to do with Privacy
If you have nothing to lose you have nothing to hide:
If you have nothing to hide you have nothing to fear:
The Borg Matrix