Domain: thedrum.com
Stories and comments across the archive that link to thedrum.com.
Comments · 5
-
Re:Obviously bullshit statement there
That's right, there isn't just 100 million lines of code, it's more than 150 million lines. This probably includes all libraries and OS fully expanded. Google is your friend for finds LOC in cars, eg http://www.thedrum.com/opinion...
-
Re:An open letter to BA upper management
Well, do the basic mathematics.
200,000 impacted passengers, lets assume a mere £100/ticket, that's £20m straight up. Throw in the £2-300 cancelled flight statutory compensation and already you're hitting £70-80m.
That's ignoring claims for meals, hotels, the knock-on impact of seating many of these passengers on future flights, reputational and brand damage..
"The media" are quoting estimates of £100-150m, which is where my 10% came from - e.g. http://www.thedrum.com/opinion...
-
Re:Facebook kills clickbait with one simple tweak.
Gotta fix this for you:
Facebook kills clickbait with one simple tweak! Number 6 will blow your mind!Really though, the clickbait industry is going into a death phase and has been since last year, and with any luck it'll kill the sites. Advertising revenue is drying up, people aren't going to the sites. Some sites have been bleeding views and uniques others have simply stalled and/or entering serious declines (article paywalled)like Buzzfeed which has lost ~32% of it's traffic since last year.. Vice for example has bled ~18% of it's traffic. Huffpo? Laying off. Salon? Laying off. Even sites like Cracked, bleeding traffic and was sold off earlier this year. Lots of stories, lots of sties besides those that live and breath on clickbait are dying. Other publications(like media) that are pushing very specific agendas, are also suffering heavily as people turn away.
-
The over-65's swung it for No
As a Scot living through the referendum, it has been a sea of optimism and YES flags and events. Many people, including myself woke up this morning very disappointed but also wondering how did this happen:
One of the biggest revelations was that The over-65's swung it for No whilst all age groups from 16 to 55 voted for independence. one of the key elements of the YES campaign is that none of the media TV channels or daily newspapers supported independence and so Scots could only get information from the internet. Twitter, websites such as Bella Caledonia, Wings over Scotland have been on the only places to find real information that hadn't been skewed heavily in favour of the No campaign.
The over-65's are the least internet connected and the most trustworthy of the BBC, even though the BBC has been accused of bias in an academic study from a survey of their entire news output over a 6 month period.
Also, the over-65's have the shortest time stake in this. plus have had the trappings of gold plated pensions that the generation behind them cannot look forward to. It's a disgusting state of affairs and as a Scot I am embarrassed for my country.
-
Re:Here's the interesting paragraph
It should be noted that the BBC is an interested party in the referendum (the first "B" gives it away). There have been protests outside the BBC offices in Glasgow because of their support for the union (even though Scottish public have to mandatory pay for the BBC if they watch TV). The BBC takes a very pro-union stance (or vote "no" stance if you prefer) so please take that into account when reading or watching BBC coverage of #indyref
BBC Scotland viewers get an assault of fear stories from Better Together campaign every day on the BBC with little or no attempt to provide the other side of the story. The BBC tried to coverup and bully an academic study into bias that proved that BBC Scotland were not following their own guidance on #indyref coverage.