Domain: worldcatlibraries.org
Stories and comments across the archive that link to worldcatlibraries.org.
Comments · 7
-
Re:Waste of Time
Here you go:
http://worldcatlibraries.org/wcpa/oclc/13498408
http://worldcatlibraries.org/wcpa/oclc/15696265
http://scholar.google.com/url?sa=U&q=http://links. jstor.org/sici%3Fsici%3D0066-4162(1986)17%253C111% 253ATSOPG%253E2.0.CO%253B2-K
http://arjournals.annualreviews.org/doi/abs/10.114 6/annurev.es.05.110174.001545?cookieSet=1&journalC ode=ecolsys
http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0066-4162(1986)17 %3C111%3ATSOPG%3E2.0.CO%3B2-K
http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0002-7294(197912) 2%3A81%3A4%3C818%3ATEOABA%3E2.0.CO%3B2-E
Seriously, anyone who has done even a minimum of reading in primate social behavior will very quickly line up behind my comment. -
Re:Waste of Time
Here you go:
http://worldcatlibraries.org/wcpa/oclc/13498408
http://worldcatlibraries.org/wcpa/oclc/15696265
http://scholar.google.com/url?sa=U&q=http://links. jstor.org/sici%3Fsici%3D0066-4162(1986)17%253C111% 253ATSOPG%253E2.0.CO%253B2-K
http://arjournals.annualreviews.org/doi/abs/10.114 6/annurev.es.05.110174.001545?cookieSet=1&journalC ode=ecolsys
http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0066-4162(1986)17 %3C111%3ATSOPG%3E2.0.CO%3B2-K
http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0002-7294(197912) 2%3A81%3A4%3C818%3ATEOABA%3E2.0.CO%3B2-E
Seriously, anyone who has done even a minimum of reading in primate social behavior will very quickly line up behind my comment. -
Worldcat; one sly fox?While it seems like a neat concept on the surface, I'm not sure I'm a fan.
The link you provided was dead for me though, although this worked:
http://www.oclc.org/worldcat/
The whole thing looks rather suspiciously proprietary; in order to get access and be able to search directly, you have to pay -- or be a member of a library that does. Basically what they're doing is getting libraries to contribute their electronic catalogs to the database, and then selling access to the resulting data -- BACK to the libraries that contributed! Not a bad business model, all they have do do is maintain the hardware and database, and watch the information and cash flow in. With every contribution, what they have becomes more valuable.
From http://www.oclc.org/worldcatsets/about/cooperative /default.htmWhile OCLC catalogers create some Collection Sets, most are built by OCLC member libraries, which have purchased a predetermined content set from a publisher and cataloged the set using OCLC cataloging tools in order to make it available to you.
... If you are an OCLC member institution, you can contribute a Collection Set of records your staff has cataloged. OCLC will set up a special authorization to allow you to input the records into WorldCat at no charge.Putting data IN to their system, that's free (naturally); getting anything useful out doesn't seem to be quite so easy, or cheap.
At least not directly. It seems that they have partnered with some web sites in a program called Open WorldCat to share their content, including with Google Scholar and Google Books, but there's apparently no direct public access. The closest I could get was by searching Google Scholar for a term, looking for the [BOOK] results, then clicking on the "Library Search" link, which took me to an Open WorldCat page.
The link to the Open WorldCat page doesn't use a human-readable link, either; it looks like a hash of some sort. For example, the Library link from the Google result for P.L. George's "Automatic mesh generation: application to finite element methods" is this:
http://www.worldcatlibraries.org/wcpa/ow/f9f4fc530 c1c64e2a19afeb4da09e526.html
Maybe someone can figure out what hash they're using and provide a way to search them directly; just in case anyone was wondering, doing a Google search for "mesh generation" site:worldcatlibraries.org doesn't return anything.
I like their concept in terms of unifying all the library records, but I really am uncomfortable and frankly put off by their obvious and shameless attempts to monetize what ought to be a public resource. I'm glad it's at least searchable through Google, but their web site makes it clear that they'd much prefer you pony up some great and unspoken (of course there's no price listed, so we can only guess) wad of cash to get at their database.
I suppose that their partnership with the likes of Google and Amazon is a step above totally proprietary databases that are 100% pay-to-play, but I still find the concept of any database that's build up almost entirely from contributions by tax-supported Public Libraries doesn't have a globally accessible direct interface to let people search it. Plus, it's not clear that the information that you can search via Google is even their whole catalog: "Open WorldCat returns only the holdings of OCLC member libraries that subscribe to the WorldCat database on FirstSearch." Assumedly, the database that you pay for is more complete, a -
Re:Porn reduced sex crime in Denmark over 60%
For anyone trying to track down the report by the (first) President's Commission: the ISBN number is 0394469941. To find it at a local library, check out this site.
-
Re:It's tough keeping a location from being lost
Not very hard to find.
Here you can search for copies of the book www.worldcatlibraries.org. A lot in New York, even in public libraries. The New York Public Library has 2 copies of the book. -
Re:...EU software patents?Why, exactly, are almost all of the "modern" programming techniques we use based on academic CS from the Seventies and before? Well, in 1980, there was this little thing called Bayh-Dole
...
Wow. I STFW for that one: if you want the mother of all software engineering consipiricies, Bayh-Dole looks like payola for monopolists 20 years later.
Is there anything in the 1980's US government that wasn't well intentioned, but poorly implemented?
Maybe is just don't trust the government.
-----------------
I had to stop this project, because I cannot afford to pay an army of lawyers every time someone wants to impose conditions on my work. Software developpers react very sensitively to this kind of terrorism. If European politicians legalise software patents in Europe, that will work as a disinscentive to software production in Europe.
-- Marcel Martin, French informatics student and author of the shareware library HIT in reply to US Company Oberthur Card System's cease-and-desist letter.
-
Re:Let them have their copyrights
It means young artists will have to search harder for their inspirations, but the results will be better for it.
Yes, to think that if Britney Spears had access to such works as American Revival Gospal of the 20s or Alternative Rock of the 70s the public might have been spared such wonderful corprate^H^H^H^H^creative acts such as Oops!... I Did It Again.
Oh, wait a minute, she's got ,tons of money and corporate backing! So, unlike a new starting atrist she can buy herself access to these works.