Slashdot Mirror


Time Travelers' Convention

usermilk writes "Some folks at MIT are holding a time-travelers' convention. The idea is to make it so famous and so widely-known that even thousands of years in the future, people will still know exactly when and where this time-traveler convention went down, and will all come travel to it at some point in their illustrious time-traveling careers. For those interested in attending, it's on May 7, 2005, 10:00pm EDT (08 May 2005 02:00:00 UTC) in the East Campus Courtyard at MIT. 42:21:36.025N, 71:05:16.332W (42.360007,-071.087870 in decimal degrees)."

836 comments

  1. Ahh... by metlin · · Score: 4, Funny


    But will John Titor be invited?

    1. Re:Ahh... by Zugok · · Score: 4, Funny

      he's already been and gone.

      --
      "I just can't sit while people are saying nonsense in a meeting without saying it's nonsense" J Watson, Sci Am 288:(4)51
    2. Re:Ahh... by bigmouth_strikes · · Score: 1

      You kidding ? I bet he claims to have founded it...

      --
      Oh, I can't help quoting you because everything that you said rings true
    3. Re:Ahh... by Omnieiunium · · Score: 1

      My friend tried to convince me he was real.

    4. Re:Ahh... by woah · · Score: 5, Informative
      John Titor.

      ...a fun read.

    5. Re:Ahh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Truth is I never cared if you "buy it", as you are all so fond of saying.

      None of you would be laughing if I wouldn't have alerted the people who needed to know about the Y2K bug. Trust me.

      Nothing changed though, you are all still gluttonous egomanianics. Sometimes I wonder if I should have bothered.

      Oh well, Pamela is still alive anyway. That should count for something.

    6. Re:Ahh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      especially when his prediction of a CJD-like disease epidemic is starting to come true in NY: Google News

    7. Re:Ahh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But John, where are your signs of civil unrest?

    8. Re:Ahh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My friend tried to convince me he was real.

      I have many friends like that. The funny thing is that nobody else can see or hear them.

    9. Re:Ahh... by Pseudonym · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I found the John Titor episode very interesting. Many people have characterised him as a hoax, but I think that's unfair. I think it was a very clever piece of Internet performance art, anticipating alternate games like I Love Bees.

      My hat is off to the guy. He's made me think a lot about how future generations will judge our current culture, which I think was the main point of the exercise.

      It reminds me a bit of Confessions of a Dangerous Mind. It was unfair to call that a "hoax" because a hoaxer expects you to believe their bullshit. Chuck Barris was trying to make a point through a clever piece of alternate-reality fiction. Much the same as John Titor, whoever he really was.

      --
      sub f{($f)=@_;print"$f(q{$f});";}f(q{sub f{($f)=@_;print"$f(q{$f});";}f});
    10. Re:Ahh... by dswensen · · Score: 2, Insightful

      What's the matter, John, didn't have "time" to make a Slashdot account?

      Hyuk hyuk

    11. Re:Ahh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One problem with his predictions though.

      Russia does not survive into the year 2015. There was another time traveler that claims Moscow would fall under the rule of some organization based in Norway.

    12. Re:Ahh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Unix has a problem in 2038"... He'll be busy fixing it man!

    13. Re:Ahh... by glwtta · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Hm, first time that the wikipedia detractors make sense to me - I know they take their NOPV thing seriously, but shouldn't there be some sort of "stupid hoax considered a stupid hoax until proven otherwise" rule?

      Striving to represent all sides of an issue is one thing, but those who believe a lame hoax and those who don't, do not two valid sides of an issue make.

      I mean, come on: "there are discrepancies between Titor's claims of the future and actual events"? Oh really, cause it all looked pretty solid to me!

      Somehow their reputation just got knocked down a notch for me.

      --
      sic transit gloria mundi
    14. Re:Ahh... by Erik+Fish · · Score: 1

      Except that Chuck Barris is a real person who (AFAIK) still claims that "Confessions..." is largely factual.

      It's not a hoax, it's not clever alternate-reality fiction. I believe the technical term is "crazy".

    15. Re:Ahh... by Pseudonym · · Score: 1
      Except that Chuck Barris is a real person who (AFAIK) still claims that "Confessions..." is largely factual. It's not a hoax, it's not clever alternate-reality fiction. I believe the technical term is "crazy".

      In interviews, he always says that he "can't confirm or deny" it, which is as close as he comes to admitting that it's a bunch of crazy bullshit. The thing is: In the 60s and 70s, Barris was virtually accused of bringing down civilisation by dragging the quality of television programming to a new low. (This was before the modern reality television phenomenon, you understand; the "low" that he achieved really was new.)

      The book was his clever swipe at those critics. In his own way, he was basically saying that it's not like he ever did anything really evil.

      --
      sub f{($f)=@_;print"$f(q{$f});";}f(q{sub f{($f)=@_;print"$f(q{$f});";}f});
    16. Re:Ahh... by Jonathunder · · Score: 2, Insightful

      So fix it. Be bold.

    17. Re:Ahh... by fishbowl · · Score: 2, Funny

      Forget John Titor. Invite Wisest Human Dr. Gene Ray, and admit that Time Cube proves You Educated Stupid.

      --
      -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
    18. Re:Ahh... by glwtta · · Score: 3
      I've read through their discussion and changelog, I think one more person coming along with "Shh! grownups are talking" will yet again be met with "if someone believes it for whatever reason, it's a valid opinion" line of thinking.

      It's really more the attitude in general rather than this silly article that worries me.

      I mean, if I claim that I have invisible aliens called Dvutels living in my attic, who only communicate with me, and only telepathically; I have presented exactly as much evidence for my story as the time traveler has, so would wikipedia be obliged to fairly represent my side in this matter?

      I can even provide a picture of my attic to show that they are invisible. Oh, I can also provide a rich and evocative description of their homeworld and its history, to strengthen my case.

      --
      sic transit gloria mundi
    19. Re:Ahh... by kernelfoobar · · Score: 2, Funny

      I can even provide a picture of my attic to show that they are invisible.

      Pffff, they're not even invisible, I can easily see them....

      --
      Here we go again!
    20. Re:Ahh... by saskboy · · Score: 1

      I play an alternate personality on a message board other than slashdot, and do what some people would refer to as trolling, but I and at least several others who don't know my true identity, think it's a form of performance art/humour. Many people find my routine funny, and although I should be irritating in how I portray myself, I give enough clues than I'm not as dumb as I come across, and that is humourous to people.

      John Titor is a performance comic/troll, which sounds to me like an interesting guy/group of people to know.

      --
      Saskboy's blog is good. 9 out of 10 dentists agree.
    21. Re:Ahh... by Dun+Malg · · Score: 2, Insightful
      I play an alternate personality on a message board other than slashdot, and do what some people would refer to as trolling, but I and at least several others who don't know my true identity, think it's a form of performance art/humour. Many people find my routine funny, and although I should be irritating in how I portray myself, I give enough clues than I'm not as dumb as I come across, and that is humourous to people. John Titor is a performance comic/troll, which sounds to me like an interesting guy/group of people to know.

      Yep, I understand the "Titor urge" well. People are willing to believe the darndest things, so long as they are "told with a straight face". The classic example is the Ouija board. There are two kinds of people when it comes to using a Ouija board as a group: the people saying "look! it's spelling something!", and the one guy who's gently pushing the pointer around and saying "I'm not pushing it!" like everyone else. I've always been the guy pushing the pointer around, myself...

      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
    22. Re:Ahh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh I have one, and of course being from 1999 I have a lower ID than you two :)

    23. Re:Ahh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      See what I mean?

      That was not me. You could count on two hands my spelling errors over the course of hundreds of (lengthy) posts to various bbs's.

      I know the difference between two and too.

    24. Re:Ahh... by Pseudonym · · Score: 1
      John Titor is a performance comic/troll, which sounds to me like an interesting guy/group of people to know.

      Not just that, but I think he did make some good points. For example, one of the questions which he kept getting asked was: "So, got any good stock tips?" His response was always along the lines of: "What do you think this says about you to future generations?"

      Yes, it's an obvious point which most of us already know, that our current era is obsessed with the acquisition of small green pieces of paper. However, the interesting thing is that he didn't even really need to troll in order to get that question out of someone. And I think he knew it in advance.

      I'd love to know who John Titor really was, just so I could buy him/her/them a round of drinks.

      --
      sub f{($f)=@_;print"$f(q{$f});";}f(q{sub f{($f)=@_;print"$f(q{$f});";}f});
    25. Re:Ahh... by John+Titor · · Score: 2, Funny

      Actually none of the previous posts are me.
      This is what happened , the short version.

      I spent too much time in this world line, time travel missions are usually of only a short duration. My lengthy stay on this world line "caused" an increase in divergence greater than expected.
      Effectively my internet fame changed your history, increasing the divergence from my own original world line.

      Towards the end of my stay here the NSA and CIA came calling; I made a quick exit to return home.

      Sadly for myself, the increased divergence between world lines meant that when returning I arrived in a word line closer to this ones future than my own world lines present.

      In other words I can never go home.

      Plans here were changed to fix mistakes and minimize resistance based on the information found on the internet about me.
      I am sorry the good guys lose this time and it is my fault.

      I decided to come back here to see how things play out.

      Unless you can be encouraged to take back the power of government from the corporations, then the future is very bleak.

      Is it me? : Slashdot ID and email John Titor,
      As my story is old someone would have registered these long ago for a prank. They were both registered today.... Now how would I have managed that?

    26. Re:Ahh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      See what I mean?

      That was not me. I know how to spell "BBSes."

    27. Re:Ahh... by DrLex · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Hmm, never heard of this guy until now. It was interesting to read. However, it's almost certain that this is a hoax, albeit done by an intelligent and talented man. What he did was trying to turn insightful predictions into something that people would actually be interested in. Time travel speaks to the imagination of many people, insightful predictions don't. He just used the time travel story as a vehicle to try to make people aware of what is going wrong in our current world. Most of his predictions are based on things that were known somewhere at the moment he made them. It was just a matter of finding that information. It's not because something hasn't been published widely yet, that it's not 'known' yet... Other predictions are just based on plausible extrapolations of current events.
      Of course many people don't buy the time travel story, hence don't believe anything of it. But at least he has managed to address some people. And for the others it was just entertaining :)

    28. Re:Ahh... by RinzeWind · · Score: 3, Funny

      I mean, if I claim that I have invisible aliens called Dvutels living in my attic, who only communicate with me, and only telepathically

      You can call that religion an earn serious cash.

    29. Re:Ahh... by EvilTwinSkippy · · Score: 1
      A funny aside. The commencement speaker at my Wife's "Yeah I got my fscking B.S." cerimony was none other than Chuck Barris.

      He had an eloquent speech about common sense. And every time he said "Common Sense" (about 75 times) the extra large funny "I'm a wizard" hat on his head smacked the microphone.

      --
      "Learning is not compulsory... neither is survival."
      --Dr.W.Edwards Deming
    30. Re:Ahh... by Pete+(big-pete) · · Score: 1

      The classic example is the Ouija board. There are two kinds of people when it comes to using a Ouija board as a group: the people saying "look! it's spelling something!", and the one guy who's gently pushing the pointer around and saying "I'm not pushing it!" like everyone else. I've always been the guy pushing the pointer around, myself...

      Heh - I was the one near the second lightswitch to the room that everyone had forgotten about, and flickered the lights at just the right moment to freak everyone out...maybe even the person doing the pushing. ;)

      -- Pete.

    31. Re:Ahh... by EpsCylonB · · Score: 1

      I just read it, I don't think its too bad, it takes it all fairly seriously but it doesn't claim that everything john titor says is true, it comments on both believers and sceptics and tries to give both sides.

      Sent back in time to retrieve an IBM 5100 ?, I know we are all geeks here but really, how boring.

    32. Re:Ahh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I AM real, you insensitive clod!

    33. Re:Ahh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you get as many people to believe you as John Titor did, then yes, you will get your own Wikipedia entry. I for one douted his claims on the basis that his time machine did not use NEARLY enough energy, but the election problems of 2000 (after he predicted election problems for 2004, before 2000) caused me to wonder if he wasn't at least a really good psychohistorian or something.

    34. Re:Ahh... by zippthorne · · Score: 2, Funny

      According to the WP article, the future hates us. If he really was from the future, you'd think he'd have a little more tact. There are few bullies that can affect the people of the future more profoundly than the directed anger of six billion forbears.

      My descendents hate me? pshaw. i'll show them. I won't have any. mwa hah ahha haha.

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
    35. Re:Ahh... by i41Overlord · · Score: 1

      Hm, first time that the wikipedia detractors make sense to me - I know they take their NOPV thing seriously, but shouldn't there be some sort of "stupid hoax considered a stupid hoax until proven otherwise" rule?

      I was thinking the exact same thing when I read the Wikipedia entry on that. They seemed to lend his hoax way too much legitimacy. I know people want the point of view to be neutral, but I think that common sense should play a role also.

    36. Re:Ahh... by metlin · · Score: 1


      Opera?!

    37. Re:Ahh... by c0d3h4x0r · · Score: 1

      Your argument reminds me of this bit from a Douglas Adams interview:

      I don't accept the currently fashionable assertion that any view is automatically as worthy of respect as any equal and opposite view. My view is that the moon is made of rock. If someone says to me "Well, you haven't been there, have you? You haven't seen it for yourself, so my view that it is made of Norwegian Beaver Cheese is equally valid" - then I can't even be bothered to argue. There is such a thing as the burden of proof, and in the case of god, as in the case of the composition of the moon, this has shifted radically.
      --
      Moderator hint: a comment is neither "Flamebait" nor "Troll" if it is true.
    38. Re:Ahh... by ComaVN · · Score: 1

      You do know that common sense directly contradicts most modern physics, a lot of mathematics, and nearly all religious believes, don't you?

      Let's keep common sense out of this.

      --
      Be wary of any facts that confirm your opinion.
    39. Re:Ahh... by i41Overlord · · Score: 1

      At least we can make sense of/proove the physics and mathematics. The wacky religious beliefs are indefensible.

    40. Re:Ahh... by djdavetrouble · · Score: 1

      it all began with B1FF !

      --
      music lover since 1969
    41. Re:Ahh... by shking · · Score: 1

      Personally, I much prefer Bif to B1FF

      --
      -- "At Microsoft, quality is job 1.1" -- PC Magazine, Nov. 1994
    42. Re:Ahh... by gstoddart · · Score: 1
      I mean, if I claim that I have invisible aliens called Dvutels living in my attic, who only communicate with me, and only telepathically

      You can call that religion an earn serious cash.

      And if you file the right paper work, it's all tax-free baby!
      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    43. Re:Ahh... by Some_Llama · · Score: 1

      "The classic example is the Ouija board...."

      Seems like you didn't know what you were doing...

      I have been able to use it all by myself.. and I KNOW I wasn't moving it...

      Although now i must strongly warn anyone who considers doing the same to never do so, if you don't already believe in good and evil you sure will and fast...

    44. Re:Ahh... by Dun+Malg · · Score: 1
      "The classic example is the Ouija board...."

      Seems like you didn't know what you were doing...

      I knew exactly what I was doing. The point is, no one else did. It was purely anonymous performance art.

      I have been able to use it all by myself.. and I KNOW I wasn't moving it...

      That's why I said "a group of people". If you get more than 3 people on a Ouija board, chances are one of them is going to be a "pusher".

      Although now i must strongly warn anyone who considers doing the same to never do so, if you don't already believe in good and evil you sure will and fast...

      (shrug) Everything everywhere is connected. You don't need a Ouija board to see it. It's just one of a myriad of ways people have contrived to get their minds to focus on something without thinking about it. I think it goes without saying that, whatever method you use, you definitely open yourself up to undesirable entities. Dunno if I'd use the word "evil" myself so much as "needy" or "hungry", but it's all a matter of interpretation, I reckon...

      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
    45. Re:Ahh... by Zarxos · · Score: 1

      There was a story a while back about the professor that found a formula to test if photos were fake or not. There's a photo in the Wikipedia article supposedly taken by Titor. Why not plug it into the formula and find out for sure?

    46. Re:Ahh... by Progman3K · · Score: 1

      >Now how would I have managed that?

      I don't see a James T. Kirk user on Slashdot... quick, I'll go register that user ID and claim to be him.

      If you are for real, why don't you go muck about in someone else's timeline?

      I for one don't like the idea of people coming from the future and messing with my timeline.

      --
      I don't know the meaning of the word 'don't' - J
    47. Re:Ahh... by Barryke · · Score: 1

      Yup. I've already been there (twice), it was quite boring. Only me and myself attended. Altough its always nice to meet yourself anytime.

      --
      Hivemind harvest in progress..
    48. Re:Ahh... by glwtta · · Score: 1
      If you get as many people to believe you as John Titor did, then yes, you will get your own Wikipedia entry.

      How many people is that? 10? 100? 1,000,000? Who decides where the cutoff is? Why is my belief less valid than his if only one other person believes it?

      Neither one of us has any kind of evidence, so his eloquence vs mine is what should decide the validity of the claims?

      Again though, it's not the existence of the article I have a problem with - I very much see the use in being able to look up 'John Titor' and find out what this obscure hoax is about - it's the content and bias that make it stand out as being below wikimedia's usual standards.

      --
      sic transit gloria mundi
  2. Sweet! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Let me just hop in my delorean, and I'll be there in 5 minutes.

    1. Re:Sweet! by morcheeba · · Score: 4, Funny

      dude. you totally missed the point!

      Let me hop in my delorean and I'll be there in 5 minutes ago.

    2. Re:Sweet! by Rei · · Score: 4, Funny

      Reminds me a bit of what my friends and I did back in high school/college (we were in a program called TAMS in which, for your last two years of high school, you went to college and stayed in a dorm). A few student groups were famous for spamming our mailboxes with notices for the meetings and posting their signs everywhere, and it was quite annoying.

      So, as a countermeasure, we formed a "Time Travellers Club". We put out notices in everyone's boxes, first notifying people of an upcoming meeting a week prior, and the second time thanking everyone for such a large turnout at our meeting a week later. We got permission to post our own sign - a big hanging one that ha our group name, and its motto ("I'll See You Yesterday!").

      Later, we found the notices on at least one RA's and one student's door - the student had apparently actually tried to go to the meeting that we thanked people for the turnout at, because they had it next to a note that said "I went, and it sucked!"

      --
      Dear Lord: One of your creatures may be hurt tonight. Please let it be the other creature.
    3. Re:Sweet! by SeventyBang · · Score: 1

      I've already been to next year's convention. Want to know what's going to happen?



      <ESP>If you write something which requires this type of markup, try again. I can't read your mind.</ESP>

    4. Re:Sweet! by fcolari · · Score: 1

      Technically, you only need one Time Traveller's Convention.

      (Apologies to Cat and Girl)

      --
      "The first rule of intelligent tinkering is to save all the pieces." --Aldo Leopold (Paraphrased)
    5. Re:Sweet! by Mycroft_VIII · · Score: 1

      I dunno, it seems to me after the fourth or fifth time visisting the SAME convention it could get borring.
      Not to mention making it hard to convice the locals your doing auditions for the next gum comercial when there are as many as 30 copies of some people with a clear age difference in some cases.

      Mycroft

      --
      https://signup.leagueoflegends.com/?ref=4c3ed6600b6ea
  3. If only... by NaNO2x · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    I was near MIT.

    --
    Utinam me logica falsa tuam philosophiam totam suffodiant.
    1. Re:If only... by jbrader · · Score: 1

      It doesn't matter. After time travel is invented you can go back and attend.

      --
      You are so boring that when I see you my feet go to sleep.
  4. Why this ain't gonna fly by mcg1969 · · Score: 1

    We all know what happens when people travel back in time and change the past. We've seen the Back to the Future series.

    So if there IS ever a time-traveler's convention, it will be held at some point in the future AFTER time travel has been perfected.

    1. Re:Why this ain't gonna fly by nkh · · Score: 1

      But if you attend this convention, you'll be instantely famous in the future, you don't need to wait anything at all.

      And FYI, Futurama's episode "S04E01: Roswell that Ends Well" shown us that you could change the past at will and even be your own grand-father (maybe they do this to us all the time without our consent, it's scary...)

    2. Re:Why this ain't gonna fly by EvilTwinSkippy · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately they picked a lousy day. The Saturday before Mother's day! Egads, you have to try to find a card, god help you trying to make a phone call.

      --
      "Learning is not compulsory... neither is survival."
      --Dr.W.Edwards Deming
    3. Re:Why this ain't gonna fly by Datamonstar · · Score: 5, Funny

      Dude, it's not like you don't have time.

      --
      The eternal struggle of good vs. evil begins within one's self.
    4. Re:Why this ain't gonna fly by GermanShorthair · · Score: 1

      THat would be worse than sibling breeding, pretty sure but I'm no geneticsissisist. You'd end up with a 6" long 2nd toe or 5sq ft of ears, something.

      --
      Karma: Bad
    5. Re:Why this ain't gonna fly by IdleTime · · Score: 3, Funny

      Well, I went back about 2000 years with a couple of pound of good hydroponically grown weed and started a groovy movement. It was back in the area that is called Israel today.

      I used this funny hispanic name, Jesus...

      --
      If you mod me down, I *will* introduce you to my sister!
    6. Re:Why this ain't gonna fly by B3ryllium · · Score: 2, Funny

      So you'd look like Prince Charles?

    7. Re:Why this ain't gonna fly by SeventyBang · · Score: 1

      Read "Time's Last Gift" - Philip Jose Farmer.

      It's got a couple of nice twists on time travel.

    8. Re:Why this ain't gonna fly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      [Futurama showed us...]you could change the past at will and even be your own grand-father

      Um, he ALWAYS WAS his own grandfather. He didn't CHANGE the past, he FULLFILLED it.

    9. Re:Why this ain't gonna fly by kylemonger · · Score: 1

      Better yet read Poul Anderson's There Will Be Time which makes the obvious point that time travelers ain't gonna congregate at some party at MIT, they're going to meet at some BIG historical event like the Crucifixion.

    10. Re:Why this ain't gonna fly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's funny, man. I have often wondered the same thing about Jesus.

    11. Re:Why this ain't gonna fly by Temsi · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Actually, here's the real reason this won't fly...

      Let's assume for the sake of argument, that this convention is discovered in a historylibrary of some sort (archives of /. perhaps), in the distant future by a timetraveler, and he decides to go.

      When he does, he'll instantly split the timeline, and the one he came from will become a parallel universe to the one he's in when he attends the convention.
      Why? Because in order for a time traveler to notice it in the future, it will have to happen at least once without him. Ergo, if I were to go to this meeting, I would not meet a time traveler, because this is "my" timeline.
      However, if this were to happen, an alternate version of me would be able to meet the time traveler, because he came back in time, after having lived later in "my" timeline, where the convention took place without a visitor from the future.
      In fact, the moment he interacts with anything or anyone from our timeline when he arrives, is when the timeline splits, because he wasn't there the first time around. So unless he's already here in our timeline, which would make me the alternate version of me, then I won't meet him.
      It's more than likely nobody from the future will show up at the convention. Unless, like I said, we're already in the alternate timeline.

      Also, when he goes back to the future, his timeline will have been altered and he may not even exist in the timeline he returns to; and he will have no way to get back to his own previous future timeline, unless he goes back again a little earlier and tells his alternate self to go back immediately without going to the convention - which of course would create a grandfather paradox, as he would then have no reason to tell himself not to go and the entire universe would simply cease to exist.

      Is that clear?

      --
      -- This sig for rent.
    12. Re:Why this ain't gonna fly by One+Div+Zero · · Score: 1

      Unless of course, there's only one timeline, and he attended the event in the past of his own timeline.

      Hey, maybe even sent himself an invitation. Or traveled back from an even later future, telling his earlier self that he better well attend, for the future of mankind depends on it - which would be silly, cause there's only one timeline anyway.

    13. Re:Why this ain't gonna fly by kyouteki · · Score: 1

      EXTERMINATE! EXTERRRRMINAAAATE!!! (dang yelling filters. What's a Dalek to do?)

      --
      A slashdotter who didn't build his own computer is like a Jedi who didn't build his own lightsaber.
    14. Re:Why this ain't gonna fly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe each soul, each consciousness, is actually in every timeline.

      No really. Have you ever blacked out from alcohol? You do things that you can't remember. It's as though someone else did them; you hear the stories the next day and they're completely new to you.

      Maybe we live all the timelines instantaneously, jumping between them like an switch alternates between Ethernet ports. But our memories only form for each timeline independently, so we never know the difference. We get to live each timeline, but our memory remains partitioned so that we don't remember all the other timelines.

      You can never prove it either way.

    15. Re:Why this ain't gonna fly by CaptainAvatar · · Score: 1

      Well, exactly. Who wants to party with a bunch of nerds at MIT?

      --
      The real Captain Avatar is a fictional character, so I suppose he doesn't mind if I impersonate him.
    16. Re:Why this ain't gonna fly by Mycroft_VIII · · Score: 1

      Maybe, depends on which theory of time travel holds (from among those allowing it).
      Single line no variation holds it your way.
      Editing allowed and multi line and limited reverse flow causality on the other hand permit some deviation therefrom.

      Mycroft

      --
      https://signup.leagueoflegends.com/?ref=4c3ed6600b6ea
    17. Re:Why this ain't gonna fly by Mycroft_VIII · · Score: 1

      Except those recruited by the other side.

      There are lots of 'logical' meeting points, and reasons to meet or not.
      In 'There Will be Time' the travelers where all self propelled and there where hints of thier existance being 'desitined' or 'purposefull'.
      However Paul Anderson is(was?) one of the more prolific time travel s.f. authors.

      Mycroft

      --
      https://signup.leagueoflegends.com/?ref=4c3ed6600b6ea
    18. Re:Why this ain't gonna fly by Mycroft_VIII · · Score: 2, Insightful

      This only holds for a few specific theories of how time(travel) works.
      Sort of a multi line/track switch theory you have for your explanation.
      Now try and work it with single-line editing allowed and still explain away the 'paradox' that implies, for extra credit give two paradox solvers. :)
      Time Travel is one of the more fun things to consider.
      Wish I could remember if anyone fun showed up at this one.

      Mycroft

      --
      https://signup.leagueoflegends.com/?ref=4c3ed6600b6ea
    19. Re:Why this ain't gonna fly by drsquare · · Score: 1

      That's just a lame rip-off of the same story line in Red Dwarf.

    20. Re:Why this ain't gonna fly by gr8dude · · Score: 1
      That's a very insightful remark. I agree. This is what I wrote in my blog:
      Second - the idea is actually very interesting. If the upcoming convention will indeed attract real people from the future, then it means that future-past-present are on the same 'axis' [if I may express myself that way]. If there will be no people who are able to prove their future-origin, it means that:

      the event was not promoted well-enough; i.e. the future-people don't know about it

      future-past-present are not on the same 'axis'; which means that whenever one goes back into the past, a copy of the universe is created and all the changes occur there, leaving the original universe intact.

      This would mean that Asimov's story called The end of eternity is false, because there is no need in people who control the 'forks' that occur in the timeline whenever something is changed in the past.

      IMHO both variants are just as probable [about copies of the timeline, or a unique timeline], because we have no arguments that make one of them more credible than the other.
    21. Re:Why this ain't gonna fly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Spanish Book "El caballo de troya" (the Troy Horse) ISBN: 8493367060

    22. Re:Why this ain't gonna fly by EvilTwinSkippy · · Score: 1

      Are you still biting your nails?

      --
      "Learning is not compulsory... neither is survival."
      --Dr.W.Edwards Deming
    23. Re:Why this ain't gonna fly by Craig_P92669 · · Score: 0

      I never did get what Ouroboros meant.

      --
      http://xs4.xs.to/pics/04481/p556222.gif
    24. Re:Why this ain't gonna fly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just who do you think is most likely to invent a time machine?

      Wouldn't they want to go back in time and show up the other MIT geeks?

      What a hack.

    25. Re:Why this ain't gonna fly by whitehatlurker · · Score: 1
      Unfortunately they picked a lousy day. The Saturday before Mother's day! Egads, you have to try to find a card, god help you trying to make a phone call.
      Dude, it's not like you don't have time.

      Reasons why time travel won't be publicised (Or isn't now)
      #134 Son/daughter, now that you've grown up and become a time traveller, you're too good to come and visit your own mother on mother's day. Where did I go wrong and how do I go back to fix that? ... Well I could go back and ground you more often - that would teach you some respect for your mother.

      --
      .. paranoid crackpot leftover from the days of Amiga.
    26. Re:Why this ain't gonna fly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think it's someone on the far fringes of the normal world like Troy Hurtubise. MIT seems content to gave at its navel and come up with robotic lips and utter shit like that.

    27. Re:Why this ain't gonna fly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      However, if this were to happen, an alternate version of me would be able to meet the time traveler, because he came back in time, after having lived later in "my" timeline, where the convention took place without a visitor from the future.

      Would this 'alternate' know that he's an 'alternate', and if not why do you think that you're not him?@

    28. Re:Why this ain't gonna fly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or he could hear about the conference, check the attendance logs, see that he was in attendance, and realize that if he doesn't go now, he'll split the timeline, and erase his own future.

      Or he'll put it off and be persuaded later. It's time travel, after all.

      Dear God, reading this I'm astounded I'm getting laid at all.

    29. Re:Why this ain't gonna fly by timur_p · · Score: 1

      You should read the "Memoirs of Ijon Tichy" by Stanislaw Lem (author of Solaris), where all the problems you were talking about were discussed and a reasonable explanation for posibility of time travel without the creation of alternative time lines is given.

    30. Re:Why this ain't gonna fly by Temsi · · Score: 1

      OK, first of all... my response was only half serious, the other half was part facetious, part mocking.
      Second, since we don't know for sure if time travel is even possible, we can't possibly know which theoretical explanation is the most likely one.
      Thus, it goes without saying there's a truckload of different explanations, with or without the idea of multiple timelines.

      --
      -- This sig for rent.
    31. Re:Why this ain't gonna fly by timur_p · · Score: 1

      "Memoirs of Ijon Tichy" is not even a quarter serios, but is extremely entertaining. you might have a glimps at the first page on amazon at http://www.amazon.com/gp/reader/0156586355/ref=sib _fs_top/102-9350581-1008139?_encoding=UTF8&p=S00E& checkSum=2y6cDzBjNqfywNgJ4sQPrTywFr5E9VKc3f%2FF305 %2F6aE%3D#reader-link

    32. Re:Why this ain't gonna fly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      gave at its navel

      "gaze".

    33. Re:Why this ain't gonna fly by Temsi · · Score: 1

      Actually, I think Tina Fey on SNL put it best when she said:
      "If nobody from the future shows up, it's because they already know it sucked."

      As far as the multiple timelines vs. single unique timeline argument... I for one favor the multiple timelines theory for one simple reason:
      A single timeline means everything is predetermined... and I don't like the idea that I'm not in control of my own destiny.
      I'm not saying it's not a valid theory, it is... I just don't like its implications.

      --
      -- This sig for rent.
  5. I tried to make it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    But I couldn't figure out where those coordinates posted. Would you mind pointing out where you are at the moment in your galactic and solar orbits relative to a few quasars, please?

    1. Re:I tried to make it by AndroidCat · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I think I'll bumped into you at a room party there. You'll said that someone on Slashdot told you how to find it, but then you'll said to not tell you when you posted because it wasn't worth the trip.

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    2. Re:I tried to make it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Well, I don't know where they are at that point in time relative to the nearest quasars, but I know that the RAC (or Relative Andromeda Configuration, a coordinate system that measures coordinates inside the Milky Way from the Line between the Andromeda Core and Milky Way Core) as 4I,2V4590KL2GETV:DN,AF6277PBE74F:8Z,R1417145YG14L with the Date/Time combination being exactly 08 May 2005 02:05:01,141461 UTC.

      For you natives, The numbers are in Base-36 (For quicker accuracy when time is of the essence. Ironic, no? Our ability to travel through time and we can't stop the Eastern Eurasian Federation from launching raids on us back home) The three numbers equate to the position of what you're trying to reach, adjusted with Sardinov's Constant to ensure you don't have any... mishaps. Most current devices have safety checks to ensure you don't hit a wall or another person, but there are many other problems with the Templar...

      Oh, if any of you see me, I'm the one on the roof with the small "laptop" device.

    3. Re:I tried to make it by dukerobinson · · Score: 1

      Well duh we are in sector 001, being bisected by the line dividing the alpha and beta quadrants.

    4. Re:I tried to make it by Walt+Dismal · · Score: 1

      Hey! Is that a police box in the corner of the room? And who's the guy with the long scarf? This is springtime!

    5. Re:I tried to make it by millennial · · Score: 5, Funny

      Sector ZZ9 Plural Z Alpha, of course.

      --
      I am scientifically inaccurate.
  6. Why did they set the date in the future? by femto · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Why didn't they set the date for yesterday? That way we wouldn't have to wait to see if it was successful.

    1. Re:Why did they set the date in the future? by Aeiri · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Because then we would be hearing reports of a massive gathering at MIT, but not know what it is.

      And on top of that, nobody from the "present" would be there.

    2. Re:Why did they set the date in the future? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Just include a note in the advertsing, asking someone to drop by and give you a lift there.

    3. Re:Why did they set the date in the future? by Bradmont · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Maybe they did and someone came back to tell us it was going to happen, so we can go; otherwise, maybe nobody from the present would believe them in the future!

    4. Re:Why did they set the date in the future? by TummyX · · Score: 1

      Because we all wouldn't know at all because then it would have occured within a different timeline.

    5. Re:Why did they set the date in the future? by anactofgod · · Score: 1

      Well, that allows persons from the present to time travel to the event, too. Why should those from the future have all the fun? Barring any unforeseen unfortunate circumstance, I'll be attempting the journey to the future from the present.

      Not that I'd expect to see any willful attendees from the future journeying back in time to attend the event. It'd violate the Temporal Prime Directive. Dog forbid that a butterfly get stepped on...

      Still, if any comely lasses from the future are seeking DNA samples from a robust and not-unattractive example of an early 21st century homo sapien male, I'd be happy to contribute. In the interest of science, of course.

      --

      ---anactofgod---

      "Equal opportunity swindling - *that* is the true test of a sustainable democracy."
    6. Re:Why did they set the date in the future? by Fjornir · · Score: 2, Funny

      Dooom! You've uncovered the secret of Flash Mobbing! Now all of us time travelers will need to go back to using raves as our cover...

      --
      I want a new world. I think this one is broken.
    7. Re:Why did they set the date in the future? by JoshRosenbaum · · Score: 1

      Still, if any comely lasses from the future are seeking DNA samples from a robust and not-unattractive example of an early 21st century homo sapien male, I'd be happy to contribute. In the interest of science, of course.

      Dibs on seconds! ;)

    8. Re:Why did they set the date in the future? by k-0s · · Score: 2, Funny

      Been there done that...it wasn't that good. John Titor got drunk and they had to call the campus police. He began yelling about having had sexual relations with the police officers grandmothers and granddaughters. They tazered him and after that the party kind of broke up. Now the 2033 Convention, now *THAT* was a party.

    9. Re:Why did they set the date in the future? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If I now set out to have a publicise a time traveller convention I never had, at which no time travellers showed, will that prove time travel is impossible?

    10. Re:Why did they set the date in the future? by timeOday · · Score: 1
      Why didn't they set the date for yesterday?
      Because if the meeting happened before they sent out the invites, they wouldn't have bothered to send out the invites, so it never would have happened in the first place.
    11. Re:Why did they set the date in the future? by EvilTwinSkippy · · Score: 1
      Still, if any comely lasses from the future are seeking DNA samples from a robust and not-unattractive example of an early 21st century homo sapien male, I'd be happy to contribute. In the interest of science, of course.
      ...
      Dibs on seconds! ;)

      Must not post joke about "Sloppy Seconds"...

      Too Late.

      --
      "Learning is not compulsory... neither is survival."
      --Dr.W.Edwards Deming
    12. Re:Why did they set the date in the future? by drwho · · Score: 1
      Why didn't they set the date for yesterday? That way we wouldn't have to wait to see if it was successful.


      They did.

    13. Re:Why did they set the date in the future? by JoshRosenbaum · · Score: 1

      Yeah, whoops! I posted too quickly. I meant second PICK of the future lasses. ;) I can already here the SUREEE's. ;)

    14. Re:Why did they set the date in the future? by TexVex · · Score: 4, Funny

      Willen haven been. You're forgetting your conjugations.

      --
      Fun with Anagarams! LADS HOST, SHALT DOS. HAS DOLTS. AD SLOTHS, HATS SOLD. ASS HO, LTD.
    15. Re:Why did they set the date in the future? by mr100percent · · Score: 1

      OR that some Past Noninterference law was passed in the future.

    16. Re:Why did they set the date in the future? by AussieVamp2 · · Score: 1

      You haven't seen A Boy and His Dog then I take it? :)

    17. Re:Why did they set the date in the future? by Mycroft_VIII · · Score: 1

      Probably thier reasoning, but then with thier lack of experience in self modified type 7 paradoxes I wouldn't expect to realize that you don't have to advertise an event you're going to have previously for time travels.

      Mycroft

      --
      https://signup.leagueoflegends.com/?ref=4c3ed6600b6ea
    18. Re:Why did they set the date in the future? by Funksaw · · Score: 1

      Ah, see, that would be the Blinovitch Limitation Effect...

    19. Re:Why did they set the date in the future? by gr8dude · · Score: 1

      Because this would be impossible.

      Here's the deal: today is the 2nd, I pick May the 1st as the date of the convention and choose a location.

      How to choose a location? Since it is already the 2nd, I know that at location-X nothing happened on the 1st, picking that location would be stupid.

      What if on May the 1st some group of people had a meeting at location-Y, does that give me the 'right' to choose location-Y?

      It will mean that there WERE attendees, but how do we know whether they were future-folk or just our contemporary fellows?

      So:
      if location-X is picked, we have two options:
      X.1 -> nothing happens, a stupid choice was made.
      X.2 -> nothing happens on May the 1st, but suddenly, on May 2nd all the news is about an event that never took place. That won't make sense. And I guess there will be a lot of black cats around [this is what happens when they change something in the matrix] ;-)
      Plus - the future people must be smart enough to realize that doing wow-things like teleporting and meta-anisotropic-xxxxxxxxing would attract attention and either make the FBI\CIA catch them and hold in captivity [to get secrets about technology, and where the terrorists are hiding, etc...] or start a real war among nations... This will make dramatical changes in history, making it probable that the future they came from won't even exist.

      and if location-Y is chosen, things will sort of fit, but this is just as stupid as 'creating' a theory that instead of predicting the output for the given input, looks at the output and 'tells' you what the input was :-)

    20. Re:Why did they set the date in the future? by dAzED1 · · Score: 1

      (golf clap)

    21. Re:Why did they set the date in the future? by Newander · · Score: 1

      Or that no one likes him.

      --

      Jesus saves and takes half damage.

    22. Re:Why did they set the date in the future? by hesiod · · Score: 1

      > this is just as stupid as 'creating' a theory that instead of predicting the output for the given input, looks at the output and 'tells' you what the input was

      You mean Quantum theory? Seems to fit well with time travel...

    23. Re:Why did they set the date in the future? by goddess32585 · · Score: 1

      actually, this weekend there was a bit of a large gathering at MIT, known as Steer Roast... we mentioned also inviting the time travelers to Roast, but then we realized that if people from the future showed up, none of us would either notice or care.

    24. Re:Why did they set the date in the future? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is that how they spell "their" in the future?

    25. Re:Why did they set the date in the future? by ear1grey · · Score: 1

      What makes you so sure it's in the future?

    26. Re:Why did they set the date in the future? by SilkBD · · Score: 1
      Why didn't they set the date for yesterday? That way we wouldn't have to wait to see if it was successful.

      They did... it was a huge flop, nobody showed up.

      --
      00101010
    27. Re:Why did they set the date in the future? by Mycroft_VIII · · Score: 1

      Actually it's usually spelled in a more rational language. Of course with the advent of a more rational language making bad spelling and grammar unpossible all the grammer nazi's finally had to seek treatment for thier disease, which turned out after much experimentation and testing it all turned out to be caused by poor nutrition and over-exposure to late night 'infomercials'.

      Mycroft

      --
      https://signup.leagueoflegends.com/?ref=4c3ed6600b6ea
  7. I already tired something like that by Kingofearth · · Score: 1

    I already tired something like that back in computer programming class. I added a message box that would pop up when ever any of my programs started telling people to travel back in time to the last day of class and where the room was located. It didn't work.

    1. Re:I already tired something like that by BigDog1942 · · Score: 1

      Why would anyone want to run your software after in the future?

    2. Re:I already tired something like that by OneDeeTenTee · · Score: 1

      Why would anyone want to run your software after in the future?

      Pr0n?

      --
      Stop the world; I need to get off.
  8. Hmmm.... by carterhawk001 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    hmm...things to remember:
    1. if a time travel came back in time and altered the past, no one would know but him/her.
    2. it is impossible to prove that our recorded history now is the same as it was 1 second ago due to rule number 1.
    3. You may be caught in a temporal causality loop, doomed forever to repeat the same period of time over and over.
    4. If time is an expression of entropy, then the only way to travel through time is to prefectly reverse entropy, which is impossible because, iirc, entropy is chaotic.
    5. If the universe is nonlinear, or rather, linear is an illusion, then there is no past or future to travel to, but only the present wich exists at any instant as a snapshot in the cascade towards greater entropy.
    6. The universe is moving towards a state of pure heat, at which time entropy will cease, as all engery, which drives entropy, will have been used. if you intend to travel through time by altering the universe around you, then you can not go past this point, or ever return. if you time travel by using internal independent means, then you may travel past this point, but you would no longer have any external means of measuring the passage of time in the universe. To time travel through external means you must increase the general entropy of the universe such that all events happen faster outside your time machine. to travel through time internaly you must slow down your own entropy. in both instances you must phase away from the universe such that you do not exist in it, lest you collide with something going faster than you can percieve.
    7 If time is a seperate dimension then you must find a way to travel in the direction that is forwards or backwards from where you are now. 4 dimensional travel occurs at a steady, measurable rate. As you approach the speed of light, this rate of passage decreases. Thus, it is logical to assume that by exceeding the speed of light in our universe of spacetime you would travel backwards in time.
    8. You may be your own great great grandparent.
    9. If you change your own past you can not go back to your own future to reap the benifits because the new future would have a new you to match it.
    10. Journeyman Project is t3h roxors!!!!!

    1. Re:Hmmm.... by Aeiri · · Score: 1

      2. it is impossible to prove that our recorded history now is the same as it was 1 second ago due to rule number 1.

      Fine by me, I didn't like my life a second ago. I'm perfectly content with my new life, though.

    2. Re:Hmmm.... by DirtyDuck · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Nah, you've been watching too much startrek.

      Assuming time travel is possible, it's impossible to alter the past.

      Think of it this way, the way something happened, is the way it happened. If you travel back in time, then you're participating in events however, your paticipation would already have happened. Therefore, anything you've already done would already have happened.

      Think of it this way. You couldn't go back in time and shoot Hilter before he got into power for the very simple reason that it didn't happen. Say you setup a sniper rifle on a building. You could try to fire but you'd either miss, the gun would jam, you'd get arrested, have a heart-attack etc. etc.

      This isn't the universe trying to protect itself or any such mystical mumbo jumbo. It's just the simple fact that a thing didn't happen and your actions in trying to change the past are already part of history.

      Probably didn't explain it very clearly. ;)

    3. Re:Hmmm.... by Basehart · · Score: 2, Funny

      "You couldn't go back in time and shoot Hilter"

      Don't you mean Mr Hilter?

    4. Re:Hmmm.... by gfody · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Probably didn't explain it very clearly. ;)

      I'm sure you meant to say that if you travel back in time to shoot hitler, you could in fact shoot him, just that once you left on your mission to shoot him you could never return to that same place because that place exists in a relative path from a place where hitler was not shot.

      Of course if you could transcend time and thus travel freely thru the infinite possible dimensions, why would you want to go and shoot hitler.. the dimension in which you shoot hitler would probably cast you a pretty dark lifetime anyways. You'd be better off choosing a dimension where somebody else shot hitler and has yourself cast as a young millionaire or something.

      --

      bite my glorious golden ass.
    5. Re:Hmmm.... by ravind · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Well if you think that it is impossible to change the past, then you have to conclude that it is impossible to change the future too because your future is somebody else's past. Which means the way your life turns out has already been determined and cannot be changed. How do you fit free will into that?

    6. Re:Hmmm.... by CowbertPrime · · Score: 3, Insightful

      actually the entire premise of the convention is flawed because the current model of time traveled dictated by relativity suggests that one cannot travel backwards in time past the point where the time machine was discovered/invented.

    7. Re:Hmmm.... by EvilTwinSkippy · · Score: 5, Funny
      Actually Time Travel by itself is impossible.

      But what you could do is slip into an alternate universe which is exactly like ours, only 60 years behind. Once there you could kill Hitler and alter History... but only in THAT copy of the Universe.

      While useless to alter history, I do find the technique works well for obtaining quality building materials, and collectables for my Ebay super-store.

      --
      "Learning is not compulsory... neither is survival."
      --Dr.W.Edwards Deming
    8. Re:Hmmm.... by mobby_6kl · · Score: 2, Insightful

      > Actually Time Travel by itself is impossible.

      Yeah, almost like it's impossible for objects heavier than air to fly

    9. Re:Hmmm.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      > Assuming time travel is possible,

      I am a time traveller, it is just that I seem unable to alter the direction and speed from that of everything else.

    10. Re:Hmmm.... by lheal · · Score: 1

      What's all this, then?

      --
      Raise your children as if you were teaching them to raise your grandchildren, because you are.
    11. Re:Hmmm.... by rar · · Score: 5, Funny

      You couldn't go back in time and shoot Hilter before he got into power for the very simple reason that it didn't happen.

      No, no, no; you got it all wrong. It was just exactly because someone went back and shot that Hilter you speak of; that the much worse dictator Hitler we do remember could come to power. :)

    12. Re:Hmmm.... by carterhawk001 · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Dont forget the multiverse, aka, the great tree of possibilities. Consider this, going back in time may be likened to moving back down the tree, and when you change something, a new branch forms and you start moving along that, parallel to the old branch. now your stuck in the new branch. The implication here is that nothing you do to alter time will truly alter time, it will just launch you along a new limb of the tree. You arent changing the past, your creating a new future.

    13. Re:Hmmm.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Doh! Free will is an illusion. David Hume demonstrated this three hundred years ago when he pointed out that, as a matter of definition, every process is either deterministic or random.

      There are two common arguments for free will and they are both extremely weak:

      (1) I feel like I have free will, therefore I do.

      (2) Free will must exist because lots of other stuff (like our moral systems, the law, etc.) don't make sense without it.

    14. Re:Hmmm.... by l810c · · Score: 4, Funny
      8. You may be your own great great grandparent.

      So let me get this straight. You have never met your great great grandma, but the pictures of her in her younger years show that she was one hot babe. You decide to go back in time and do her?

    15. Re:Hmmm.... by servognome · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Everything you do and think is based on the electrochemical reactions in your brain. If we understood how all the wiring of the brain works, and understood all the inputs the output could be predicted. There is no freewill, just a reaction to a given series of inputs.

      --
      D6 63 0D 70 89 81 BB 8E 7B 7C 5F 5D 54 EA AB 73
    16. Re:Hmmm.... by Frogbert · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I've always wanted to know why anyone would risk changing the past, I mean if I were to go back in time and kill Hitler as a child then perhaps the world would not have had WWII which would be good in the short run but it would mean that most countries probably wouldn't figure out that having all out war is bad for everyone involved. If war was staved off for a little while and weapons got more powerful then the next war they had would be even more devistating.

    17. Re:Hmmm.... by mog007 · · Score: 1

      10. Journeyman Project is t3h roxors!!!!!

      Dude, +5 classic game reference.

      I miss that series.

    18. Re:Hmmm.... by Jim+Starx · · Score: 1

      The difference being that one is forbidden by the laws of physics, where one was just a lamens argument put forth by those who had no education on the subject. Wanna guess which is which?

      --
      The darkness... controls the music. The music... controls the soul.
    19. Re:Hmmm.... by tmortn · · Score: 1

      Yes, but only on THIS timeline. On others its an entirely differnt story.

      --
      I don't ask you to be me. I only ask you not expect me to be you.
    20. Re:Hmmm.... by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      There's an episode of Futurama that explains how this works...

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    21. Re:Hmmm.... by dnoyeb · · Score: 1

      apples n oranges. will is not an electrochemical term. It can not be measured physically. So to say there is no free will because the physical universe is predictable, is mixing apples n oranges.

      Perhaps you want to say there is no free action?

    22. Re:Hmmm.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      David Hume demonstrated this three hundred years ago when he pointed out that, as a matter of definition, every process is either deterministic or random.

      What does deterministic mean? Is it like when I studied java and just so happened to get a job programming in it?

    23. Re:Hmmm.... by Corporal+Dan · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I highly recommend "To Say Nothing of the Dog" by Connie Willis on this same theme.

    24. Re:Hmmm.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, no, no; you got it all wrong. It was just exactly because someone went back and shot that Hitler you speak of; that the much worse dictator Hitler we do remember could come to power. :)

      As a matter of fact, this is the eighth time we've had to go back in time to kill that muther, and each time we had to wait a few years to see whether it would work, but each time another dude pops up and tries to exterminate the Jews. It's like there is something else involved here....

    25. Re:Hmmm.... by WCityMike · · Score: 0

      Actually, I hate to break it to you, but time travel's already happened for you. You somehow got bumped into an alternate universe. In ours, the leader of the Third Reich was named H-i-t-l-e-r.

    26. Re:Hmmm.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      No, actually, what he was trying to say is that, if you went back in time to try to shoot Hitler, you'd fail. How do we know this? Easy, Hitler came to power, didn't he? Well, then we know he wasn't murdered before he came to power. Simple, eh? Watch "12 Monkeys" very carefully, as it shares his ideas about causality.

      What you're saying is more akin to what he was arguing against. Don't agree? read it again.

    27. Re:Hmmm.... by It's+People! · · Score: 1
      Same here, it's sad that the fourth one was canned. One of the lead guys on the game set up an archive of the old Presto Studios webpage, along with forums and a lot of stuff that wasn't orginally available. (A mac application of Legacy of Time that uses the data files from the high res PC DVD version, for example.)

      You can see it at http://presto.tommyyune.com/

    28. Re:Hmmm.... by cortana · · Score: 1

      Do you have any links that would be understandable to a layman? :)

    29. Re:Hmmm.... by GermanShorthair · · Score: 1

      2. it is impossible to prove that our recorded history now is the same as it was 1 second ago due to rule number 1.

      It may be but that would assume that all time travelers are infallible in their secrecy. Sure, maybe one would slip up here and there but then we assume that any coverup attempts are also completely infallible.

      --
      Karma: Bad
    30. Re:Hmmm.... by NanoGator · · Score: 1

      "Think of it this way, the way something happened, is the way it happened. If you travel back in time, then you're participating in events however, your paticipation would already have happened. Therefore, anything you've already done would already have happened."

      Depends on what you believe, I suppose. For all we know, travelling in time means creating a new time line. What happened before you travelled still happened, but then you created a new time line and altered it instead.

      I may be full of shit, but it seems to me that we, as a species, have a lot to learn about what time actually is and how to change our point in it. I just hope that if it's the sort of thing that would destroy the universe (i.e. paradox), that the the universe would have some sort of protection against that. Either in the form of impossibility, or that it can support paradoxes in some form.

      I hate talking about this shit.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    31. Re:Hmmm.... by 2marcus · · Score: 1

      The important thing is that history stays self consistent. I think that some weirdo journal like New Scientist once published a time travel paper which included a "pool table" example. This example posited that Pocket A of the table connected via a time travel wormhole to Pocket B, such that a ball entering Pocket A would exit Pocket B 5 seconds in the past.

      Now, imagine a universe in which you hit a pool ball (X) straight between the two pockets. It hits the wall, ricochets back, everything is fine.

      Except that one time you do this, a ball Y comes flying out of Pocket B, knocking into ball X such that ball X goes into Pocket A at exactly the right time and angle that it would emerge from pocket B in the past as ball Y...

      Now you have two possible universes, both of which are perfectly self consistent. Which one happens?

      -Marcus

    32. Re:Hmmm.... by servognome · · Score: 1

      It's true will cannot be measured physically, as it is a creation of philosophy. To have will requires accepting the idea of influence from outside the boundaries of the universe. Therefore the reason human action cannot be predicted is because it is in fact random

      I prefer to look at human action as a complex system, like the weather. We do not accept the weather as having free will, it doesn't rain when we predict it should be sunny because it wants to. It is a system that theoretically could be understood, however, the vast number of variables put it beyond our abilities.
      The human mind is the same way, a kid doesn't just decide to kill a bunch of people, theoretically such action could be predicted, however the vast number of genetic and environmental influences puts it beyond us.

      --
      D6 63 0D 70 89 81 BB 8E 7B 7C 5F 5D 54 EA AB 73
    33. Re:Hmmm.... by StarManta.Mini · · Score: 1

      10. Journeyman Project is t3h roxors!!!!!


      I thought I was the only one who ever played that :-)
      Buried in Time was even better, tho.

    34. Re:Hmmm.... by Boglin · · Score: 1
      Well, there is a possible method for it to still work, but you have to dip even further into scifi. Basically, if a civilization on a distant planet has already discovered time travel, we could use their time machine to head back to this convention. However, this also means that any time travel that will visit must come frmo far enough in the future that

      1. Mankind has explored enough of the universe to find a civilization who invented the time machine many years ago (you must account for travel time from their planet back here for the conference).
      2. Mankind has established friendly enough diplomatic relations with this species that they'll let us borrow it.
      3. Humanity has nothing better to do with its time than find old conferences and travel back to them.
    35. Re:Hmmm.... by Jeremi · · Score: 1
      You'd be better off choosing a dimension where somebody else shot hitler and has yourself cast as a young millionaire or something.


      So, everybody with a time machine immediately sets out to find and move to the Best of All Possible Worlds, and you know what that means -- gentrification! Pretty soon that once-paradise is overcrowded with time-travel immigrants and a lousy one-bedroom apartment costs $2 billion a month.

      --


      I don't care if it's 90,000 hectares. That lake was not my doing.
    36. Re:Hmmm.... by Jeremi · · Score: 3, Insightful
      If we understood how all the wiring of the brain works, and understood all the inputs the output could be predicted.


      Are you sure? If quantum mechanics are involved in any meaningful way, then some of the events may be literally random (i.e. not a function of any observable input). In that case, even perfect knowledge of the inputs and the wiring would be insufficient.

      --


      I don't care if it's 90,000 hectares. That lake was not my doing.
    37. Re:Hmmm.... by Altima(BoB) · · Score: 1

      I think Journeyman games were awesome, and one of the best things about it was the Aurthur the wisecracking A.I. buddy didn't annoy the shit out of me. I mean, come on, you have a comedian voicing a smartass computer making jokes all the time... it could have sucked. But instead, he even made fun of the game design sometimes ("Hey that rug looks like it belongs on William Shatner's head...") And finally... it let me live my dream of being killed Monty Python style. By a cow. Mais oui!

      --
      Yup...
    38. Re:Hmmm.... by Jaiwithani · · Score: 1

      Daniel Dennet, Freedom Evolves: Free will has jack squat o do with determinism or chaos. It's about complexity and order.

      --
      By the time you've rhymed one line, I've already busted ten; You rap in exponential time and I'm big-O of log(n).
    39. Re:Hmmm.... by gfody · · Score: 1

      it'd be a different place for each time traveler. where they all intersect is where they all started

      --

      bite my glorious golden ass.
    40. Re:Hmmm.... by Cecil · · Score: 1

      the current model of time traveled dictated by relativity suggests that one cannot travel backwards in time past the point where the time machine was discovered/invented.

      This has absolutely nothing to do with general or special relativity.

      It is a theory cooked up by some scientists and propped up with a few bits of logic, to try and explain why no one has ever met a real time traveller if time travel will indeed one day become possible.

      It's a counter-argument to the suggestion that because surely in the vastness of time, at least one time traveller from the future would inevitably return to somewhere within our recorded history and make themselves known. But since we have never seen it happen, the argument goes, time travel must not be possible.

      It's a crackpot theory pitted against another crackpot theory which refutes another crackpot theory, and so on and so on. Relativity itself suggests that time travel is possible -- but only by impossible means (exceeding the speed of light), so it basically says it's not possible unless another part of the theory is wrong. However, even Einstein thought he would be proven wrong one day, so you never know.

    41. Re:Hmmm.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative
      Doh! Free will is an illusion.

      These kind of blanket "I know everything" comments make me cringe. Just because you quote a 300 year old philospher does not make it so. And invoking Homer Simpson does not help your cause.


      as a matter of definition
      There are very few definitions in the world of phiolpsphy and free will is certainly not one of them.

      every process is either deterministic or random

      Are not all things that happen in life, the universe and everything built upon previous events? And if this is the case, is there not a chain of causality (from Buddist tradition) which denotes a non random behavior to all things (psedo-random)? Existentialist thought suggests that we have some sort of nebulous/public "free will" (i.e.- we're all in this together), ala Martin Heidegger's Das Eine.


      Not that this is necessarily correct, mind you. That's the beauty of philosophy.. it's a securlar "religion"(at least the non religious part:)).


      Please refrain from assuming that any methaphysical subject is without question, correct, in the future.. at least giving better arguments than "Doh! Free will is an illusion."... because some old dead guy says so... Or at least giving some credence to you "argument". Try not to assume everything your professors harp on is true.



      Just my thoughts.

    42. Re:Hmmm.... by drwho · · Score: 1
      Nah, you've been watching too much startrek.


      Assuming time travel is possible, it's impossible to alter the past.


      Think of it this way, the way something happened, is the way it happened. If you travel back in time, then you're participating in events however, your paticipation would already have happened. Therefore, anything you've already done would already have happened.


      You're not getting it. These types of things go on. Remember the chicken and egg paradox? Well, you're the egg...which will grow up to be a chicked, and travel back in time...


      This is how the universe began.

    43. Re:Hmmm.... by LiENUS · · Score: 4, Funny

      Akin to subversion branching. The only question is, is there a "universe merge" command waiting to be discovered?

    44. Re:Hmmm.... by Mr.+Underbridge · · Score: 1
      While useless to alter history, I do find the technique works well for obtaining quality building materials, and collectables for my Ebay super-store.

      Don't forget sports gambling, as pointed out by Biff in "Back to the Future II."

    45. Re:Hmmm.... by gfody · · Score: 2, Funny

      I've actually never seen 12 monkeys. I probably wont now that I know it's based on a 12 year olds perception of time travel. Your gun would jam or you'd have a heart attack? Thats nonsense.. wouldn't your time machine break and you wouldn't be able to even try, after all there's no documented history of an attempt on his life or ANY time travellers for that matter.

      Are you a time traveller? Didn't think so. I am, in fact, a time traveller. What happens once you leave this dimension to travel to another one you can do anything you want, however you can't return back to your original dimension because it becomes impossible to find. For instance, I went back about 30 minutes to fix a spelling mistake in my original post. The dimension I left is now missing a me (unless me from another dimension happens to populate it (possibly correcting a different spelling mistake)) and me in this dimension can't return to that one because I'd never find it since I would have to predict all the events in the universe since the fork 30 minutes ago and I'd much rather stay here 30 minutes behind because it's similar enough to the place I left and I don't feel like killing the native version of myself again.

      --

      bite my glorious golden ass.
    46. Re:Hmmm.... by niteice · · Score: 1

      MOD PARENT UP
      One of the coolest scifi books I've read (HHG2G notwithstanding). In fact, some of its ideas about time travel in general are being used in a game I'm developing.

      --
      ROMANES EUNT DOMUS
    47. Re:Hmmm.... by WarPresident · · Score: 1

      Actually, a rather smart fellow by the name of Einstein theorized that time travel was indeed possible.

      Want to travel in time? Hop into your spaceship, head out for a leisurely cruise at or near the speed of light. Turn around after six months and return to Earth. You've aged a year, but quite a few more than that have passed on Earth.

      Want to go backwards in time? I leave that as an exercise to the reader. Hint: think black holes.

      --
      Here come da fudge!
    48. Re:Hmmm.... by nrlightfoot · · Score: 1

      I was thinking about this very problem recently, and came up with a possible solution. One theoretical time machine involves putting one end of a wormhole near a neutron star or black hole so that one end gains a time differential as compared to the other. If perchance, there are natural wormholes, some of them may already have an end located near an object dense enough to cause this time differential, and thus there may be natural time macines out there waiting to be discovered. Of course you wouldn't have any control over how far back in time you went with any one wormhole, so it could be difficult to actually make it to the time of the conference. Thus I predict that even if time travel is possible, there will be few if any future attendees. Also they may not show up to avoid altering the timeline, should that turn out to be possible.

      --
      what sig?
    49. Re:Hmmm.... by The_reformant · · Score: 1

      I remember attending an introductory lecture when i was deciding which uni to go to and one of them touched on time travel. Basically they were saying the conventional view that time travel forwards is possible and backwards isnt but the thing I really like was they had this little diagram and the section representing backwards time travel was simply labelled as FORBIDDEN!

      --
      I have discovered a truly remarkable sig which this post is too small to contain.
    50. Re:Hmmm.... by roman_mir · · Score: 2, Funny

      but when you got there she turned you down because she doesn't date geeks and so you can never exist in the future. Thus if you are your own great great grandfather you don't exist.

    51. Re:Hmmm.... by Jim+Starx · · Score: 1

      I don't think the effects of relativity can really be called time travel. Just like falling off a building can't really be called flying. I think round trips have to possible before you can justifiably call it time travel.

      --
      The darkness... controls the music. The music... controls the soul.
    52. Re:Hmmm.... by operagost · · Score: 1

      Excellent post. I was going to make some sweeping statements based on stuff some other dead guys said, but I like your way better.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    53. Re:Hmmm.... by AKAImBatman · · Score: 1

      Not quite. The theories behind Wormholes suggest that a Wormhole could be used for a sort of timetravel. The only issue is that you couldn't travel back any further than the creations of the hole itself.

      Wikipedia has some info on the subject.

    54. Re:Hmmm.... by operagost · · Score: 1

      You draw a conclusion based on an oversimplification of a very complex process which is not fully known. There is much yet to discover about the brain and making dismissive statements about how it works doesn't make it just another simple machine. You yourself said that we do not understand how the wiring of the brain works, so how can we eliminate the "ghost in the machine?"

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    55. Re:Hmmm.... by operagost · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Hop into your spaceship, head out for a leisurely cruise at or near the speed of light.
      Half right. Travel at precisely the speed of light is prohibited.
      Want to go backwards in time? I leave that as an exercise to the reader. Hint: think black holes.
      Hint: I believe you really have no fucking idea and just like to watch yourself post.
      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    56. Re:Hmmm.... by MoogMan · · Score: 1

      No. You see your great great grandma in a picture and shudder with the knowledge that someday, you *will inevitably* go back in time and do her.

    57. Re:Hmmm.... by Punboy · · Score: 1

      Depends on which theory you believe. You can't change what happens in one timeline but can cause an alterante timeline to come into existance. Actually, all possible outcomes exist as separate timelines, infinitely splitting off from eachother. Going back in time and "changing" the past, simply changes what timeline "you" experience.

      --
      If you like what I've said here, and want to read more, go to http://www.krillrblog.com
    58. Re:Hmmm.... by soft_guy · · Score: 1

      she doesn't date geeks and so you can never exist in the future

      Hillarity ensues as our protagonist desperately tries to be cool. He enlists the aid of the future "King of Rock and Roll" Elvis Presley who is only six years old.

      --
      Avoid Missing Ball for High Score
    59. Re:Hmmm.... by Bitsy+Boffin · · Score: 1

      To save people the exercise (and because black holes are a red herring, perhaps you could use the power of a BH to power it but it's not a time machine on it's own)...

      Step 1. Make a wormhole, preferably large enough to travel through, or at least large enough to send data through.
      Step 2. Put one end of the hole on a spacecraft and send it out into space as close to the speed of light as you can.
      Step 3. After a while turn around and bring it back. The end of the worm hole that went near light speed is now "older" than the end that stayed where it was (time passed more slowly for the moving end relative to the stationary end).
      Step 4. Send stuff in the older end of the hole and have it come out in the future, send stuff in the newer end of the hole and have it come out in the past.

      The catch of course is that you can never go back earlier than you created the hole, you can only travel in discreet units of time (unit being the time difference between the ends), and you can not travel into "the future" (you can only travel forward from the past, not the present).

      --
      NZ Electronics Enthusiasts: Check out my Trade Me Listings
    60. Re:Hmmm.... by clean_stoner · · Score: 1
      No no no, it's because you accidentally travel back in time because you put metal in the microwave while watching a supernova. While there you spend all your time trying to protect your great grandfather so you will still exist, but he ends up being killed in a nuclear test. Since you still exist you come to the obvious conclusion that the woman he was engaged to is not your grandmother so it's okay to do her. Only after waking up in the morning does Professor Farnsworth explain to you that she actually is your grandmother and you've just become your own grandfather.

      For those of you with no idea what I'm talking about, watch more Futurama.

      --

      Sigs are for the weak.

    61. Re:Hmmm.... by vincentj7 · · Score: 1

      "I did do the nasty in the pasty!"

    62. Re:Hmmm.... by kooshvt · · Score: 1

      Thats nonsense.. wouldn't your time machine break and you wouldn't be able to even try, after all there's no documented history of an attempt on his life

      There isn't?

      Assasination attempts

    63. Re:Hmmm.... by dasheiff · · Score: 1

      Actually Time Travel by itself is impossible.

      Realitivity doesn't rule time travel out. Using a black whole where the 4th and 3rd dimention are flipped would allow you to go into the event horizon, move in one direction, but really be move in time. It's just a Russian theory but even entropy itself doesn't prevent it just makes it need ungodly amounts of energy.

    64. Re:Hmmm.... by AKAImBatman · · Score: 1

      Half right. Travel at precisely the speed of light is prohibited.

      Light does it. And some particles are known to travel far faster than the speed of light for short periods. The problem with these methods are:

      1. Light is more or less massless and is forever frozen in "time".

      2. Any particle that travels faster than light must pay back that energy, thus arriving at its detination in a period consistant with travel below the speed of light.

      In short, there's no problem with meeting or exceeding the speed of light. It's just that the universe conspires against us to make sure that the net result is not useful in any way. :-)

    65. Re:Hmmm.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This sounds like what happens on numerous occasion on Stargate SG-1 (at least in the earlier episodes, where they don't throw in the 'alternate universe' deal).

      Basically, every trip to the past, and any 'changes' to the past as a result, weren't really changes but rather just parts of existing history being fulfilled. As they said on the show, it was a self-fulfilling prophecy of sorts.

    66. Re:Hmmm.... by Mattintosh · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Better yet... Time travel isn't possible because time doesn't exist.

      We speak of "time" because it's convenient. It allows us to measure our lives and our activities against a single background. We keep track of "time" by observing the predictable patterns of celestial objects, as well as by setting mechanical devices to synchronize with those celestial movement cycles.

      But what exactly is "time"? Time is a series of events. Nothing more. You can't undo things in real life. A broken vase can't be put back together just by reversing the event that caused it to break. Why? Because events are irreversible. You can cause a negating event for some things (like turning a light on or off), but you can never undo an event once it's done.

      So, simply put, time doesn't exist. It's merely perception of a series of events. The fact that it's perception is made clear by the phrase "time flies when you're having fun." Your brain records images of events into your memory, sometimes with a record of celestial body locations or numeric representations thereof.

      The more interested you are in what is happening around you, the more things your brain will record. But having limited processing resources, it will skip the "timestamp" on many of those events. The relative difference between each "timestamp" is much farther apart than is expected or normal, so "time flies."

      When you're disinterested in events around you, the opposite is true. Your brain records some meaningless drivel and since it has lots of resources available, it slaps a "timestamp" on every one of those mental notes. Boring stuff seems to take much longer because of this.

      Let's see the writers for the next Star Trek series (several years from now, I hear) put this tidbit of time-travel logic to work. It'll at least spare us some crappy re-hashes of Nazis in space (spaaaaaaaaaaaace?).

    67. Re:Hmmm.... by MaineCoon · · Score: 1

      Red vs Blue (http://www.redvsblue.com/ portrayed time travel this way in their later episodes (around episode 49 or 50).

      --
      Hunt your preferred prey at Aliens vs Predator MUD. Join the war at avpmud.com port 4000
    68. Re:Hmmm.... by shogun · · Score: 1

      But what you could do is slip into an alternate universe which is exactly like ours, only 60 years behind. Once there you could kill Hitler and alter History...

      Would be a little late for that, he'll have been dead for 3 days already...

    69. Re:Hmmm.... by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      Verily.

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    70. Re:Hmmm.... by luigi1015 · · Score: 1

      But what if you created a new timeline?
      Assuming that time naturally progresses in a linear fashion, there had to have been a timeline that you didn't go back. Then you go back in time, at which point history changes and creates a new timeline. This isn't your timeline, so you are not bound by what happened in your old timeline. So then you kill Hitler, and then time unfolds like you really did kill Hitler. But this is a seperate timeline with you existing during WWII, so it doesn't matter if this isn't what you remember. You belong to the timeline where you only existed from your birth on, or only one of you existed if you were born before WWII. You are kind of like a visitor in the new timeline. So then time unfolds, and eventually you are born. But this isn't really you is it? This is the new you in the new timeline.

      So this would also explain why killing your parent before you were born isn't really a paradox. You're only preventing the you in the new timeline from existing. The old you still exists since you were born in the old timeline.

      Another way to think of that is less confusing IMO is that the past isn't real in the way that the present or a physical object is. The past is only an absract list of changes to an ever moving present. That way a person's past doesn't really matter, just their present. So these time paradoxes of killing parents doesn't create paradoxes because at the moment of the kill, you're alive now.

      I guess a good analogy would be memory. Memory is really just a state of the memory parts of the brain. What is happening right now creates a memory, which lingers as a part of the state of the person's memory. Memories of events, people, objects, etc can be created, changed, and removed by various means. The only thing that affects your memory right now is what you remember happening, not what really happened.

      Then our reality is like the universe stuck in a vivid dream, with all the people, objects, environments, events, etc as parts of the dream for the universe to remember. Your birth, death, and time travels are all just new memories creating the memory of your existence or nonexistence. So when you go back in time, that is like another memory for the universe. You can go around doing things in the past, which creates more or different memories for the universe. When you kill your parent, you have killed their memory and the possiblity of creating the memory of your birth. But the universe has the memory of you living when you killed your parent, so it runs with that memory and you still exist in the dream. You just don't get born again and only exist from the moment you reappeared from the time travel.

      I think that pretty much explains how I think of it. I might have lost everyone since I don't know that I could follow it.
      My explanation for time travel gets a lot from the explanation in Back to the Future II (or at least the one I remember if there are parts in the movie that contradict my theory). Remember I didn't say the first or third movie, since those express different views, the most glaring of which that I remember are the parts about photos changing and Marty dissapearing.

    71. Re:Hmmm.... by willpall · · Score: 1
      when you change something, a new branch forms and you start moving along that, parallel to the old branch. now your stuck in the new branch.

      IIRC, each branch is always perpendicular to every other branch. Of course this would require infinite dimensions, but given that, every single time a quantum event happens, all other possible events happen as well, going off into their own branches.

      --
      Libertarian: label used by embarrassed Republicans, longing to be open about their greed, drug use and porn collections.
    72. Re:Hmmm.... by NichG · · Score: 1

      But randomness itself has predictable properties. - mean, deviation, higher moments of the distribution of outcomes... If there's a random element to a person's actions, that by definition means that that element has no connection to the person's current state. It can't really be seen as 'will' because there's nothing behind it. It's 'predictably unpredictable'.

    73. Re:Hmmm.... by tavilach · · Score: 1
      Your example is actually a little bit misleading, as you only take into account big events. When you go back in time to shoot Hitler, forget about Hitler. You will no doubt kill a few microbes in the process. Those microbes are not going to come back to life, and as such, you have indeed changed the past. Of course, you couldn't have changed the past, because if you had changed it, you would have been travelling from an alternate reality (the reality for which those microbes had died so many years ago). You aren't going to magically miss or have a heart attack, as you would still end up killing microbes.

      Of course, as you said, this does not prove that time travel is impossible. It merely shows that some common conceptions regarding time travel are completely paradoxical. Time travel might give the illusion of changing the past, but that "changed" past would not be your past.

      --

      "Give me a lever long enough and a fulcrum on which to place it, and I shall move the world." -Archimedes
    74. Re:Hmmm.... by NichG · · Score: 1

      For any sufficiently long period of time after event, the outcome of a single change is likely to be random anyhow, so it probably wouldn't really matter. Of course, the necessary time may be very long for a well-chosen point of change. So I wouldn't think it's really that much of a risk to change the past, but its probably not all that useful unless you make very well-studied choices. Killing a single historical figure is not likely to create such long-term significant changes if the things that let that figure have the opportunity to become renowned are still present. For example, if you went back and killed Newton, its unlikely that no one would ever uncover the mysteries of 'Newtownian' mechanics, it'd probably just take longer. If you killed Hitler, it might very well be that you'd end up getting another war shortly after, maybe even a war with similar participants and similar atrocities.

    75. Re:Hmmm.... by tavilach · · Score: 1

      From the perspective of an outside observer, you are correct: There is no free will. However, because we define ourselves (i.e. the very term self) by our reactions to a given series of inputs, then we do indeed have free will from this perspective. And, of course, this is the perspective that really matters.

      --

      "Give me a lever long enough and a fulcrum on which to place it, and I shall move the world." -Archimedes
    76. Re:Hmmm.... by tavilach · · Score: 1

      You'd thing all of those alternate universes would cause a stack overflow!

      --

      "Give me a lever long enough and a fulcrum on which to place it, and I shall move the world." -Archimedes
    77. Re:Hmmm.... by droleary · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Think of it this way, the way something happened, is the way it happened.

      Buddy, I've got a cat in a box that would or would not beg to disagree.

    78. Re:Hmmm.... by Headcase88 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Problem is, you wouldn't even have to shoot Hitler or anything drastic like that. Just existing for any amount of time could make huge changes happen over time, which is somewhat explained by the Butterfly Effect.

      Now, here's the tricky part: what if I decide not to go in the past and me going into the past is part of history? That would change history and oh I've gone crosseyed.

      Since I'm not a big fan of predetermined fate, I must assume that no one may go in the past of their own dimension. The two seem to go hand-in-hand as far as I see.

      --
      "When the atomic bomb goes off there's devastation...but when the atomic bong goes off there's celebraaaaation!"
    79. Re:Hmmm.... by CaptainAvatar · · Score: 1
      And some particles are known to travel far faster than the speed of light for short periods.

      OK, I'll bite. Which particles would those be?

      Light is more or less massless and is forever frozen in "time".

      No, light is exactly massless. More or less.

      --
      The real Captain Avatar is a fictional character, so I suppose he doesn't mind if I impersonate him.
    80. Re:Hmmm.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Assuming time travel is possible, it's impossible to alter the past."

      Well, first, I think time travelling is pretty impossible in the sense we understand the concept.
      Then there is this "time is just an illusion"-stuff, that I don't understand even at the concept level.

      But anyway The Anubis Gates by Tim Powers deals with the problems with time travelling in quite humourous way.

      (spoiler)

      The guy in the book picks up an old, old book from a bookself. The book hasn't been touched in centuries. He then opens it up from a random page and what he sees, makes him almost crap his pants.
      Later he travels hunderds of years back in time and happens to bump into that same book. He gets an idea.. With a wicked smile on his face, he takes out a pen from his pocket, opens the book from the same page he did earlier and decides to have a little fun on his own expense.

      It's a fun and well-written book (series), I recommend if you like sci-fi and humour.

    81. Re:Hmmm.... by CaptainAvatar · · Score: 1
      Oh sorry, I should have twigged you were talking about virtual particles.

      By the way, Google scares me sometimes. I did a search on "FTL" and "Heisenberg" and it expanded "FTL" to include "faster than light" and "faster-than-light"! Forget about SkyNet, Google is where the rise of the machines started ...

      --
      The real Captain Avatar is a fictional character, so I suppose he doesn't mind if I impersonate him.
    82. Re:Hmmm.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it is one of the greatest films ever made.
      its is a nod to the artistic wonder that is La Jetee.
      i recommend seeing both.
      its not about causlaity and time travel in sofar as
      as the stress of the soul and not having all of the facts.

      please see it and astound yourself on how hollywood can get it right.

    83. Re:Hmmm.... by Mycroft_VIII · · Score: 1

      Well there wasn't when he posted that, but someone ha(s/d) a wierd sense of humour and some spare explosives.

      Mycroft

      --
      https://signup.leagueoflegends.com/?ref=4c3ed6600b6ea
    84. Re:Hmmm.... by maxpublic · · Score: 1

      Well if you think that it is impossible to change the past, then you have to conclude that it is impossible to change the future too because your future is somebody else's past.

      That doesn't logically follow. You assume because there is a singular past there must also be a singular future, and therefore the universe is deterministic. False reasoning at it's finest.

      Max

      --
      My god carries a hammer. Your god died nailed to a tree. Any questions?
    85. Re:Hmmm.... by maxpublic · · Score: 1

      Relativity doesn't speak to time travel. Time travel is nothing more than fodder for bad science fiction novels, and even worse pseudoscience.

      Max

      --
      My god carries a hammer. Your god died nailed to a tree. Any questions?
    86. Re:Hmmm.... by maxpublic · · Score: 1

      The problem with stuff like this is that it's properly used to point out flaws in theories, such as with the wormhole example. It's *improperly* used by crackpots and marginally educated geeks to show 'why time travel could work'.

      Time travel is a logical fallacy. If a theory allows us to posit a possible time travel scenario that doesn't mean that time travel is possible; it means that our theory is fucked up in some fashion and needs to be improved.

      Max

      --
      My god carries a hammer. Your god died nailed to a tree. Any questions?
    87. Re:Hmmm.... by Temposs · · Score: 2, Insightful

      My theory is that this(that the past and future are already set constant) is indeed the case and that free will is still possible. The way it would work is that you make your choices independent of time. It is your consciousness by means of your body that travels in linear time, experiencing your choices.

      But they are all your choices. So in my theory you have in fact already chosen your future choices, but not really because it's outside of time so there is no "already chosen".

      It's more like, your choices are as much a part of your being as your left arm or your mind, soul, spirit, whatever. So at the same time that your choices are "set" in advance, you still freely make all your choices, since they are a part of you.

      This roughly solves the paradox of a set time continuum and having free will. It precludes you to believe in your being existng outside of time and such.

      --
      Knowledge is just opinion that you trust enough to act upon. -Orson Scott Card
    88. Re:Hmmm.... by Jafafa+Hots · · Score: 1
      You'd be better off choosing a dimension where somebody else shot hitler and has yourself cast as a young millionaire or something.

      But the you that's already there would probably get pissed at you for trying to lay claim to his money.

      --
      This space available.
    89. Re:Hmmm.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tachyons, discovered in CERN.

    90. Re:Hmmm.... by mdielmann · · Score: 1

      The implication here is that nothing you do to alter time will truly alter time, it will just launch you along a new limb of the tree. You arent changing the past, your creating a new future.

      Wow, when you look at it that way, I wouldn't feel guilty at all about going back in time and killing off all the people who pissed me off. They wouldn't die, but they wouldn't be pissing me off anymore, either. Now where did I put that list...

      --
      Sure I'm paranoid, but am I paranoid enough?
    91. Re:Hmmm.... by dario_moreno · · Score: 1

      for me, Google passes the Turing test. See my journal.

      --
      Google passes Turing test : see my journal
    92. Re:Hmmm.... by unitron · · Score: 1

      If Tim Powers ever wrote anything that wasn't great I haven't found it yet, but "The Drawing of the Dark" is the best I've read so far.

      --

      I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

    93. Re:Hmmm.... by Syre · · Score: 1

      Perhaps you're thinking of tachyons , which (if they exist) go faster than the speed of light.

    94. Re:Hmmm.... by dario_moreno · · Score: 1

      It's called the Langevin twin paradox of special relativity, and needs acceleration (with general relativity computations) to work (clocks orbiting around Earth, for instance). In the experiment you describe when you're back you have aged exactly the same than the people on Earth.

      --
      Google passes Turing test : see my journal
    95. Re:Hmmm.... by PaganRitual · · Score: 1

      3. You may be caught in a temporal causality loop, doomed forever to repeat the same period of time over and over.

      hey, as long as it happens on a sunday night, where i wake up and it's saturday morning again, over and over, i'm fine with that.

    96. Re:Hmmm.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      It's like there is something else involved here....

      Don't you know, it's in the nature of German people! You can't stop it by shooting one guy!

    97. Re:Hmmm.... by ArsenneLupin · · Score: 1
      No no no, it's because you accidentally travel back in time because you put metal in the microwave while watching a supernova.

      That should teach you put fun stuff into the microwave. Didn't your mother tell you this was bad?

    98. Re:Hmmm.... by Bitsy+Boffin · · Score: 1

      Time travel is a logical fallacy. If a theory allows us to posit a possible time travel scenario that doesn't mean that time travel is possible; it means that our theory is fucked up in some fashion and needs to be improved.

      Or it means you havn't considered that humankind doesn't yet know enough about the dimension of time or the physics of the universe in general to know that time travel is possible.

      It might be possible, probably not through the ways we have currently considered though as the theories we have now are probably incorrect but they seem to work well enough.

      Time travel is not a logical fallacy, you might be able to provide a logical proof showing that a particular type of time travel with particular assumptions is impossible, but there are other sets of assumptions and rules that can provide for time travel, perhaps ones nobody has thought of yet.

      We don't know very much about time really especially not at the extremes, to most it's "just this thing, you know", but once you start really thinking about what time is you find out there is so much more to it, and very likely so much more we don't know yet.

      Time, space and the speed of light are funny things, don't presume that you can state a property as fact.

      --
      NZ Electronics Enthusiasts: Check out my Trade Me Listings
    99. Re:Hmmm.... by elgatozorbas · · Score: 1
      You couldn't go back in time and shoot Hilter before he got into power for the very simple reason that it didn't happen. Say you setup a sniper rifle on a building. You could try to fire but you'd either miss, the gun would jam, you'd get arrested, have a heart-attack etc. etc.


      That logic makes little sense, because in your Hitler case, an attempted murder would have been reported. It find the way it works in BTTF more logical: going back alters the future.

    100. Re:Hmmm.... by elgatozorbas · · Score: 1
      Well if you think that it is impossible to change the past, then you have to conclude that it is impossible to change the future too because your future is somebody else's past. Which means the way your life turns out has already been determined and cannot be changed. How do you fit free will into that?

      That's no contradiction because you have the free will to determine what this guy's past will look like.

    101. Re:Hmmm.... by elgatozorbas · · Score: 1
      Yeah, almost like it's impossible for objects heavier than air to fly

      You mean like birds? No-one ever tought birds were 'impossible'.

    102. Re:Hmmm.... by elgatozorbas · · Score: 1
      So let me get this straight. You have never met your great great grandma, but the pictures of her in her younger years show that she was one hot babe. You decide to go back in time and do her?

      Hey, this is /. For some this may be the most likely way to do _anyone_.

    103. Re:Hmmm.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are not all things that happen in life, the universe and everything built upon previous events?

      No. Heisenberg uncertainty and quantum mechanics in general is based on random behavior.

      Are not all things that happen in life, the universe and everything built upon previous events? And if this is the case, is there not a chain of causality (from Buddist tradition) which denotes a non random behavior to all things (psedo-random)?

      Now you're quoting another dead person who is basing his philosophy on arbitrary things. Science says otherwise based on observation.

    104. Re:Hmmm.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If time travel is possible (the one-universe variety), then you know that eventually some jackass is going to travel back and give away the history of the next 1000 years..

    105. Re:Hmmm.... by SamSim · · Score: 1

      My take on the idea is that going back in time causes the universe to split. There are two universes - the one where you come from, from which you have now *permanently* disappeared, and the new one, where you can kill Hitler, prevent yourself being born, etc. etc.

    106. Re:Hmmm.... by EvilTwinSkippy · · Score: 1
      Stack based processors went out with Unisys.

      Which of course means that the next Insanely Great idea to come swirling down the bowl from Intel will be "Stack based processors".

      Just look surprised. [clickity, psychodelic lights] Hey you did!

      --
      "Learning is not compulsory... neither is survival."
      --Dr.W.Edwards Deming
    107. Re:Hmmm.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nope, don't go back to kill hitler; I've done it four or five times. Haushoefer picks a different guy to start the movement each time, once picking someone who didn't rise to power. The Japanese, on the same timeline and practically a clone of the German cultural/war effort, wiped everyone out. They didn't strike the USA until after they owned Europe and sushi was never popular. Ironic, isn't it? :)

    108. Re:Hmmm.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You still believe in "free will"? After all the knowledge people have gained on how the brain functions and causality, it should be obvious that all our actions are already predetermined by the configuration of our neurons based on "memory" and the current balance of chemicals within our brains.

      Think of breaking the set on a pool table. It appears random on the surface, but in reality the pattern the balls go in could theoretically be precisely calculated before hand if all variables were known.

    109. Re:Hmmm.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The whole 'no free will' thing is really just a cop-out excuse for people to abrogate any sense of personal responsibility. It's guilt-trip-b-gone.

    110. Re:Hmmm.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      There are very few definitions in the world of phiolpsphy and free will is certainly not one of them

      I didn't attempt to define free will. I was referring to the definitions of "process", "deterministic" and "random". Obviously.

      And I didn't say it was true because David Hume said so. I mentioned him both because his argument is transparently correct and to demonstrate that this isn't exactly news.

      Existentialist thought suggests that we have some sort of nebulous/public "free will" (i.e.- we're all in this together), ala Martin Heidegger's Das Eine.

      Get a grip. Existentialism is a long-winded reiteration of my original point (1).

      Not that this is necessarily correct, mind you. That's the beauty of philosophy.. it's a securlar "religion"

      Religion indeed. A source of comfort for the credulous. A source of power for the hierarchs.

      Try not to assume everything your professors harp on is true.

      I'm long past having professors. You might profitably ask your kindergarten teacher for help with spelling and comprehension.

    111. Re:Hmmm.... by The-Bus · · Score: 1

      I find it much easier to just alter Wikipedia history entries that time traveling. And just like time traveling, someone comes along and "fixes" my mistake. Sigh.

      --

      Small potatoes make the steak look bigger.

    112. Re:Hmmm.... by stinerman · · Score: 1

      Perhaps some of our Gentoo friends should try "emerge universe".

      Hmm, I wonder how long it might take to compile all possible universes.

    113. Re:Hmmm.... by AKAImBatman · · Score: 1

      Oh sorry, I should have twigged you were talking about virtual particles.

      ??? No, actually I was referring to the Quantum Tunnelling effect. A particle can temporarily steal sufficient energy from surrounding particles to break the speed of light. (And thus actually pass through objects unchecked!) The problem is that at the end of its journey, the particle must pay back the *entire* balance of energy, thus giving it a zero net gain in travel time.

      As usual, Google has more info. Watch out for Skynet, though... ;-)

    114. Re:Hmmm.... by AKAImBatman · · Score: 2, Informative

      tachyons , which (if they exist

      They don't. Tachyons were a weirdness created by some of the early attempts at String Theory. Later work at correcting the mathematical holes in the theory eliminated the possibility of tachyons.

    115. Re:Hmmm.... by fabiopetz · · Score: 1

      yes, the speed of light seems to a way totravel trhough time. however until now, and maybe forever we cannot do that due to limitations of our bodies. they should have considered not only receiving visitors but also information. so maybe they could arrange a video-conference, not a convention.

    116. Re:Hmmm.... by golgotha007 · · Score: 1

      If that's the case, then why does his post exist at all?

    117. Re:Hmmm.... by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 1
      But what you could do is slip into an alternate universe which is exactly like ours...

      ...at which point "an alternate universe" becomes the new "Canada" where the hypothetical girlfriends of young geeks live: "I went to Probability 5439954634 with my parents this summer, and I met this great girl, but her parents won't let her come see me (or write or call)."

      --
      Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
    118. Re:Hmmm.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You might or might not have a cat in a box.

    119. Re:Hmmm.... by Lodragandraoidh · · Score: 1
      ...after all there's no documented history of an attempt on his life...


      Actually numerous attempts and plots were made to kill Hitler during his life without success.
      --

      Lodragan Draoidh
      The more you explain it, the more I don't understand it. - Mark Twain
    120. Re:Hmmm.... by LiENUS · · Score: 1

      7 days?

    121. Re:Hmmm.... by Lord+of+Ironhand · · Score: 1
      Quantum Consciousness, Stuart Hameroff

      A very interesting theory, IMHO. Recommended reading for people who, like me, can't accept the idea that our minds are basically just very advanced computers with consciousness being an illusion resulting from sufficiently complex computations, but want to stay far from the spiritual/religious mumbo-jumbo as well.

    122. Re:Hmmm.... by EvilTwinSkippy · · Score: 1

      You mean Godwin's Law?

      --
      "Learning is not compulsory... neither is survival."
      --Dr.W.Edwards Deming
    123. Re:Hmmm.... by EvilNight · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You could kill Hitler.

      It's just that someone would have to take his place. I don't mean some other random person, complete with history and name changes... I mean someone would literally have to step into his name, his life, his shoes, and become him. They would need to carry out Hitler's actions right up to the end. That would particularly suck for Hitler, as well. If there be a judgement day, how much would it suck if you'd been killed (and replaced by an actor) prior to committing your particular line of atrocities? Just who gets the blame in that situation? What if someone killed Einstein in a similar situation, when he was still a patent clerk, leaving him without the knowledge of his life's work? That's a new kind of identity theft, and a particularly nasty crime.

      There's no such thing as "one time traveller." If a time machine is invented, it will lead to a time travelling society, with a multitude of time travellers. The creation of the invention invariably leads to a society (undoubtedly post-human) based upon its use. If you say the device would cause the destruction of the society that created it, then obviously this would have already happened, and no society that would destroy itself with time travelling could come into being. Only one that could use it properly would be able to exist. Any self-invalidating timeline cannot exist.

      The creation of the time machine is inevitable; if it can be done, it will be done once our science permits it. Relativity has ruled it possible, but then we know fuck-all about the universe, really, so as far as I'm concerned it's up for debate. Even if you cannot go back past the creation of the time travelling device (as several ideas suggest), there may still be natural phenomenon that allow travel back to near the big bang (natural wormholes, etc) and subsequent creation of a temporal highway with a very long reach.

      Sure, you can't push a man through that hole, but you could push nanites through, and electrons or information. Star-Trek style transporter technology (digitization via quantum entanglement) could render an information pattern that could be sent over such a highway and assembled from local materials on the far end. A Temporal Area Network sounds like quite an engineering challenge. I wonder if we're up to it.

      There would undoubtedly be temporal pollution (time travellers changing events, intentionally or accidentally), however, none of it would change the known universe in the slightest, because, as you say, it would have already happened. No self-invalidating timeline can exist; therefore this timeline we travel down is not self-invalidating. This does not mean it must make sense to the observer, however. A "paradox" is only an apparent paradox; it exists only in the mind of the observer due to the observer lacking the relevant information to make sense of the apparent paradox. (Or, you can use the many worlds interpretation, if you choose, but frankly that one strikes me as nuts, though it does carry inherent immortality as a bonus, which is rather nice).

      Meddling gets harder and harder the closer we get to an information society, but prior to the mass spread of recording devices, one could get away with a great deal, moreso and moreso as one goes further back in time. Go back even a hundred years from now and one could get away with just about anything. Any event can be tampered with, provided the outcome ends up the same in the end. If you think about this for very long, you will bleed from the ears when you realize just how many things can be altered with ease.

      This logic is very useful in defeating the usual gamut of time-travel paradoxes that confound most people who haven't spent much time thinking about what it really means. No one who would decide to travel back and kill their parents would exist in the first place; if someone existed who could actually make the attempt, it would be because they were adopted and killing the wrong target, or because some other time traveller stepped in and corr

      --
      Hell is being intelligent in a world full of idiots.
    124. Re:Hmmm.... by Minwee · · Score: 1

      If I was talking about something completely and totally different, that would be right.

    125. Re:Hmmm.... by anakin876 · · Score: 1

      last season's finale was great - we all travelled in time so that now no one had to do anything.

    126. Re:Hmmm.... by FuzzyBad-Mofo · · Score: 1

      Why are we so quick to accept that the speed of light is the maximum possible velocity? Not that long ago it would have seemed absurd that man could exceed the speed of sound..

    127. Re:Hmmm.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you with the Computel Corporation by any chance?

      Possibly assigned to Project Timerider?

    128. Re:Hmmm.... by Snaller · · Score: 1

      Probably didn't explain it very clearly. ;)

      Well you are also wrong. You could go back and kill hitler (assuming he is the one you mean ;) - and in the new timeline you create he would never stomp around europe and cause wars, but in the original timeline you come from nothing would have been changed because of that.

      --
      If Google really cared they would fix Android Chrome to reflow text, instead of discriminating
    129. Re:Hmmm.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why not? She wouldn't be any more closely related to you than a third cousin. I believe you can legally marry a third cousin in any state of the Union.

    130. Re:Hmmm.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That doesn't logically follow. You assume because there is a singular past there must also be a singular future, and therefore the universe is deterministic. False reasoning at it's finest.

      However, if this is true for us in the "present", why would time function differently for those in our past? Either your saying that time works only in one direction and implying that events in our past are "set-in-stone". That excludes "functional" time travel (going back and changing history, not the esoteric phenomena that is theorizied to happen with faster-than-light travel). You might be able to view it by some means, but injecting yourself into it would impossible. The only other option is that the timeline can branch and loop back on itself. In one branch the past stays the same, that's where you originate. In another the past is changed, that's where you "go back" to after the change, provided you don't somehow remove yourself from existence (again it's just in timeline that results from your change, you still exist in the other timeline until you leave it by going back into the past).

      I have no way to test the veracity of either of these postulates though.

    131. Re:Hmmm.... by maxpublic · · Score: 1

      However, if this is true for us in the "present", why would time function differently for those in our past?

      "Time" doesn't function at all in the past, by definition. The past isn't 'happening' for anyone; it's already occurred.

      You might be able to view it by some means, but injecting yourself into it would impossible.

      Both things are impossible.

      The only other option is that the timeline can branch and loop back on itself.

      This assumes that time is a sort of force or universal property that can be manipulated. To the best of our knowledge time is a subjective referent for a series of observed events which cannot be reversed. The idea of 'time' is merely a convenient way of marking these events, e.g., the rising and setting of the sun.

      There is no evidence whatsoever that time exists as an actual property of any kind in the observed universe.

      Max

      --
      My god carries a hammer. Your god died nailed to a tree. Any questions?
    132. Re:Hmmm.... by plagioclase · · Score: 1

      8. You may be your own great great grandparent.

      Well, there are currently known procedures that enable someone to become their own grandpa. So I suppose once 'science' got involved, this was an inevitable extension.

      --
      Yeah, I have a webcomic...
    133. Re:Hmmm.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This assumes that time is a sort of force or universal property that can be manipulated. To the best of our knowledge time is a subjective referent for a series of observed events which cannot be reversed. The idea of 'time' is merely a convenient way of marking these events, e.g., the rising and setting of the sun.


      General Relativity postulates that time is such a universal property, and there is evidence to back this up. Minor time dialation has been found in extremely precise, time dependent activities. For example, GPS signals have to be corrected for devations that fit with predictions on time dialation. There have also been actual experiments to prove this effect as well. So time seems is a universal property of some sort, whether it can be intentionally manipulated is another matter.

    134. Re:Hmmm.... by gfody · · Score: 1

      you have to kill him.. you get used to it

      --

      bite my glorious golden ass.
    135. Re:Hmmm.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      7 days?

      Perhaps, but if there are an infinite number of possible universes, it will take an infinite time to complie them all (regardless of how short the compilation time is for a given universe). Just be thankful we are in a universe that was relatively early in the queue.

    136. Re:Hmmm.... by robca2 · · Score: 1

      Well then this is a good way to determine if anybody's invented a time machine yet, be it GE's secret lab or some nerd's basement.

    137. Re:Hmmm.... by ivrcti · · Score: 1

      Mr Hawking makes a good case for the existence of time in his book "A brief history of time." However, closer to your arguement, he uses Einstien's General Relativity to show that we each carry our own version of time. He further demonstrates that we can't go back in time by using the 2nd law of thermodynamics. Yet, he devised a now widely accepted concept of "imaginary time" (mathematical definition rather than literary) in which travel in both directions is quite possible.

    138. Re:Hmmm.... by JahToasted · · Score: 1
      Well it seemed to me like 2 monkeys was a pretty good representation of time travel up until the end. The time travellers were sent back to try to find the source of a plague so that the scientists of the future would be able to find a cure for themselves.

      I think in one scence they told bruce willis not to bother interfering, but to just get them information.

      The end was really good, but I'm still not sure why he was told to try to stop the disease from being spread. I always thought that the guy who gave him the gun at the end was acting on his own and not from orders from the future.

      All and all it was a good movie and worth your time viewing, even if you may not like the ending for being off.

    139. Re:Hmmm.... by JahToasted · · Score: 1

      its the only way he'd be immune to the brain waves of the flying brains.

    140. Re:Hmmm.... by mutterc · · Score: 1
      My favorite argument in favor of free will comes right out of Philosophy for Dummies:

      We define "free will" as the grandparent does: "being able to affect the future via your own choices". Since believing whether humans have free will or not is a choice, we can conclude:

      If humans don't have free will, it doesn't matter whether you believe we have free will or not, as that choice (the belief) can't affect the outcome of any events.

      If humans do have free will, then your belief in that area matters. (For example, without free will, there's no point to morality, as the outcome of everything is pre-determined).

      Conclusion: You might as well believe humans have free will (believing it is a plus if it's true, and doesn't affect anything if it's not true).

    141. Re:Hmmm.... by AaronStJ · · Score: 1

      > How do you fit free will into that?

      You don't. I have seen no convincing evidence that you need to include free will to have an accurate picture of reality.

      (coincidentally, this is why omniscience (God) is imcompatible with free will. This is how you get Calvinism)

      --
      Stupid like a fox!
    142. Re:Hmmm.... by porcupine8 · · Score: 1

      If it's unclear, you can just go read Harry Potter 3, or even watch the movie - pretty good example of how going back in time doesn't change anything, it just makes it happen the way it happened.

      --
      Warning: Apple/Nintendo fangirl. Likes her electronics cute & cuddly. May be rabid.
    143. Re:Hmmm.... by Cecil · · Score: 1

      Well, mostly because things like the sound barrier were not based on any particularly hard science.

      Beyond that, also because it is inevitable that as we discover more about the universe we will become gradually more confident that our answers are getting closer and closer to the "truth". Somewhat counterintuitively, each theory we disprove actually means we know a little more about the universe and how it works (or at least, how it does not work), and therefore our current set of theories is that much more trustworthy and correct.

      By the way, I do not accept the speed of light being the maximum possible velocity personally. I think that's much to depressing to accept. It basically rules out humanity really ever expanding beyond our little group of local stars, nevermind to the other end of the galaxy, and certainly not other galaxies. And being the great explorers that we are, that would just be sad. I am sure that someday, somehow, it will be broken. Even if it's just faster-than-light communication, a la Ender's Game. (This, at least, is theoretically possible via quantum entanglement... the bits would be in finite supply though.. forget about that interstellar OC-192.)

    144. Re:Hmmm.... by CowbertPrime · · Score: 1

      you just called Wheeler and Thorne liars. way to go there.

    145. Re:Hmmm.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You might profitably ask your kindergarten teacher for help with spelling and comprehension. Glad I could piss you off enough to insinuate that I could make money from my kindergarten teacher. Haven't done either one in a while.

    146. Re:Hmmm.... by maxpublic · · Score: 1

      General Relativity postulates that time is such a universal property

      It does no such thing. In fact, time is strictly relative to the observer, hence the whole 'relativity' thing. The experience of time is entirely subjective and wholly depends on your point of view. Einstein went to great pains to explain this to the rest of the world and it's one of the reasons so many found it hard to accept his theories.

      Max

      --
      My god carries a hammer. Your god died nailed to a tree. Any questions?
    147. Re:Hmmm.... by PhraudulentOne · · Score: 1

      Yeah, or it's the opposite. Your thinking and willing is what causes electrochemical reactions in the brain. You know, as the brain reacts to what you are thinking/feeling. You don't think the mind is encased in that grey matter do you? You should be able to understand this based on your last sentence. Based on a series of given inputs, my brain can/may/will act completely different from yours. Does this mean that our wiring is completely different, or does will come into play? Perhaps it is my reaction, based on my mind as opposed to my brain, that causes the brain to act in a different way. Anyway, I always find it humourous when science steps in and says that "hey, we have some electochemical reactions going on, that must be what is controlling the body." Well what is causing those reactions to take place? Are you controlled by someone else, are you just a puppet? Are you just here to be controlled by a hard-wired apparatus that you can do nothing about? No, not at all. You can see this plain as day.

      --
      You create your own reality - Leave mine to me.
    148. Re:Hmmm.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually in the original timeline, it was a Jewish leader exterminating the Germans.

    149. Re:Hmmm.... by LiENUS · · Score: 1

      Compile each universe within itself, that way it only takes 7 total for them all to be done.

    150. Re:Hmmm.... by servognome · · Score: 1

      Does this mean that our wiring is completely different, or does will come into play?

      Yes our wiring is different. Between genetic and environmental effects, the wiring can end up being different.

      Are you just here to be controlled by a hard-wired apparatus that you can do nothing about?

      Why not, there is nothing that proves otherwise. Computers are in their infancy, and we can create pretty good AI's. The machine does not have a will, it just follows a set of rules. The human mind is far more complex, so it could have larger more complex set of rules.

      --
      D6 63 0D 70 89 81 BB 8E 7B 7C 5F 5D 54 EA AB 73
    151. Re:Hmmm.... by Zeroko · · Score: 1

      What if free will is like this: "before" the beginning of time, we made our choices, then the universe unfolded as it did as a result. It looks predestined, but the laws & initial conditions (& any external influences) are actually a result of free will.

    152. Re:Hmmm.... by Zeroko · · Score: 1

      We do not know for certain of that is true (we do not even know for certain if relativity itself is true), so that is the point of the convention - to see if anyone manages to come back, & if so, to find out how (if they will tell us & we can understand, of course).

    153. Re:Hmmm.... by Zeroko · · Score: 1

      & the German discoverer of time travel decided to use it to free his people, but his successor wanted more, so he went back again, & ultimately, someone killed the inventor of the time machine & the whole mess vanished from history, leaving only the Hitler of whom we know. :) (Where would that put me, being part German & part Jewish?)

    154. Re:Hmmm.... by Zeroko · · Score: 1

      Either - it is irrelevant (unless one or the other would make the equations more consistent or beautiful or whatever). Unless, of course, X thinks "Oh, no. Not again."

    155. Re:Hmmm.... by Mycroft_VIII · · Score: 1

      Slashdot itselft is a temporal anomaly of sorts and things like that can happen here.
      Don't tell me you fell for the 'dupe' cover story explaining why many front page articles apear to be repeats when they are in fact temporal echos of each other.

      Mycroft

      --
      https://signup.leagueoflegends.com/?ref=4c3ed6600b6ea
    156. Re:Hmmm.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The belief that "nothing" is behind the randomness of the universe is a metaphysical one, and not an empirical fact. For example, if we take free will + karma to mean that we can take any action we "like" (subjective free will), but some of our intentions will have an "opposite" effect on our actions that we cannot control, that'd ensure that statistically and to observers, our decisions seem random.

      Besides, while in principle the statistics of randomness would need to hold for QM in the brain, I don't think it's at all clear yet how this randomness would manifest itself in the whole. We still don't have enough answers about what in the brain corresponds with what we perceive to be our own minds. Theories, sure, but nothing close to what you'd need to understand the statistical effects of QM on human behaviour and free will.

    157. Re:Hmmm.... by NichG · · Score: 1

      Well, it doesn't matter how the numbers are generated as long as they end up having the exact same distribution. Chaotic processes, or an entity outside the universe playing bingo and calling out the numbers. There is no measurable difference between the two. So if thats free will, then a sufficiently good random number generator also has free will. There's nothing measurable that can draw a distinction between a perfect RNG and 'unpredictability due to free will'. This is a very general argument - it simply works on the separation of things into what must depend on an earlier state and what cannot depend on an earlier state, it has nothing to do with the structure of the brain or any specific cognitive system.

    158. Re:Hmmm.... by CowbertPrime · · Score: 1

      yes that is what i was referring to. You can bend spacetime to form CTCs.

  9. Hm by inKubus · · Score: 4, Funny

    They should plan out all the conferences in advance for the next 10,000 years, like the freemasons did in 5000 b.c.

    --
    Cool! Amazing Toys.
    1. Re:Hm by ameoba · · Score: 1


      Technically, you would only need one time traveler convention

      --
      my sig's at the bottom of the page.
    2. Re:Hm by ameoba · · Score: 1
      --
      my sig's at the bottom of the page.
  10. gets the imagination going by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    youve gotta love those mit guys and their uncanny study avoidance manouevres

    1. Re:gets the imagination going by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yet they still manage to stay one of the top schools in the world. go figure?

    2. Re:gets the imagination going by ChairmanMeow · · Score: 3, Funny

      So the lesson in all this is that you should never study.

      --
  11. I was there by Winlin · · Score: 3, Funny

    It was great.

    1. Re:I was there by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It was OK, but the one they held in 2030 was much better organized.

    2. Re:I was there by sveskemus · · Score: 1
    3. Re:I was there by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think he might have cheated...

    4. Re:I was there by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      If you remember May 7, 2005, 10:00pm EDT (08 May 2005 02:00:00 UTC) in the East Campus Courtyard at MIT. 42:21:36.025N, 71:05:16.332W (42.360007,-071.087870 in decimal degrees), you weren't there.

    5. Re:I was there by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why does the first person to say this get modded redundant and the 50 people who say it afterwards (literally) don't get modded at all?

    6. Re:I was there by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's going to have been great. Had you will have been looking forward to it?

    7. Re:I was there by May+Kasahara · · Score: 1

      Maybe you should see what kind of time machine he has...

  12. The Convention by Link310 · · Score: 0, Redundant

    I went, and let me tell you, it will have been a blast!

    1. Re:The Convention by Mr.+Bad+Example · · Score: 5, Funny

      > [...]it will have been a blast!

      I believe you mean willan on-be a blast.

    2. Re:The Convention by inKubus · · Score: 1

      Obligitory Hitchhiker's reference, thank you. Which brings up an interesting point, they can come to opening day of hitchhikers, chill out yesterday, today, and next week and then get to the party. This also allows them travel time, because they will have to fly in from Germany or Russia, where the invention is most likely to be made. Or perhaps Betelguese. Sod it

      --
      Cool! Amazing Toys.
    3. Re:The Convention by Nehle · · Score: 2, Funny

      Though this is hardly the time to be conjugating verbs in the past-impossible-future-never-tense.

  13. RSVP? by Dachannien · · Score: 5, Funny

    For those interested in attending, it's on May 7, 2005, 10:00pm EDT

    Oh, I'm sure I'll get around to it one of these days.

    1. Re:RSVP? by Joe+the+Lesser · · Score: 1

      Don't bother, it was really lame.

      --
      "I only speak the truth"
      Karma: null(Mostly affected by an unassigned variable)
  14. this shit makes sense... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    create a history of "time-traveller" friendly events and someday, who knows, we may meet a time-traveller .

  15. Actually... by inertia187 · · Score: 0

    Technically, you would only need one time traveler convention. Time travelers from all eras could meet at a specific place at a specific time, and they could make as many repeat visits as they wanted. We are hosting the first and only Time Traveler Convention at MIT in one week, and WE NEED YOUR HELP!"

    But if it gets popular, theyll run out of space pretty quick.

    --
    A programmer is a machine for converting coffee into code.
    1. Re:Actually... by EvilTwinSkippy · · Score: 1
      No, because there would only be one time traveler at the convention at a time.

      If he/she left an impression that altered history we would get a few bits of wierdness [bamf] wiel Der Zeitungs Bereuf versuchet ein resoluzion vor den [bamf] time paradox. At which point anyone in attendance would have their mind wiped.

      --
      "Learning is not compulsory... neither is survival."
      --Dr.W.Edwards Deming
  16. so theoretically by hsmith · · Score: 0, Redundant

    if someone were to travel back in time and come to this event, they would be present, wouldn't they?

    So if there is no one present from the future theoretically we never figure out how to transend time.

    Or they don't care enough about this period of time

    1. Re:so theoretically by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, there are several designs for time machines in which you can travel anywhere in time after the machine was switched on. So trascending time in a limited sense with a giant rotating cylinder (yes folks, that's "all" you need. Good look getting a star-mass cylinder spinning up to near light-speed without it flying apart...)

    2. Re:so theoretically by dustinbarbour · · Score: 1

      This is jsut an elaborate experiment to test whether time travel ever becomes possible. If no one shows up, we know that time travel never happens. Glad to see some serious research coming out of MIT.

    3. Re:so theoretically by kubrick · · Score: 2, Interesting

      in which you can travel anywhere in time after the machine was switched on

      I can do that, but unfortunately the speed is fixed. One second per second.

      --
      deus does not exist but if he does
    4. Re:so theoretically by johnjay · · Score: 5, Funny

      "So if there is no one present from the future theoretically we never figure out how to transend time." Or the party on May 7th becomes famous throughout time as one of the most suck-ass parties in all history. So, time travelers decide to skip it.

    5. Re:so theoretically by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, with the giant-rotating-cylinder gizmo after the machine is switched on, you can travel back to any point in time after the machine was switched on. Theoretically. But we must be careful to distinguish time-as-a-dimension and proper-time-with-an-entropic-arrow in this case. If you leave future A, going back to past of future A just after the machine has turned on, you can NEVER return to future A, you'll just end up in future B instead.

    6. Re:so theoretically by Liquidrage · · Score: 1

      Yes, it's similar to the Fermi paradox. Though I don't think we need MIT's meeting to prove this to us.

      If time-travels exist, why don't see evidence of it?

      Similarly, one can deduce that no deity/civilization ever becomes, or was, omnipotent and benevolent.

    7. Re:so theoretically by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      In the infinite spacetime of the universe, surely somebody would be geeky enough to want to come...

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    8. Re:so theoretically by hal9000(jr) · · Score: 1

      This is jsut an elaborate experiment to test whether time travel ever becomes possible. If no one shows up, we know that time travel never happens. Glad to see some serious research coming out of MIT.

      Silly rabbit. If no one shows up, it means they have something better to do than show up at a MIT event. An event that was probably motivated by students trying to get them (future peeps) to answer the question of whether time travel is possible. :)

    9. Re:so theoretically by GermanShorthair · · Score: 1

      Dude! You were so wasted! Remind me to never buy that Gold shit in a bottle again! What will be her name again? Saw you then!

      --
      Karma: Bad
    10. Re:so theoretically by kalidasa · · Score: 1

      Yes, but curiously enough they all lived in the middle years of the first decade of the second millenium . . . .

    11. Re:so theoretically by dj245 · · Score: 4, Funny
      Or the party on May 7th becomes famous throughout time as one of the most suck-ass parties in all history.

      As someone who frequents these types of parties I can tell you they never go bad. Whats so bad about a bunch of engineers having huge drunken bonanza?

      "Dude, why is your volumetric spirit flow rate decreasing exponentially as a function of time while your volumetric elimination flow rate increasing as a logarithmic function of time?"

      Yeah, those types of parties.

      --
      Even those who arrange and design shrubberies are under considerable economic stress at this period in history.
    12. Re:so theoretically by Dyolf+Knip · · Score: 1

      Third millenium. The 1st was 1-1000 AD, the 2nd 1001-2000 AD.

      --
      Dyolf Knip
    13. Re:so theoretically by Dyolf+Knip · · Score: 1

      How exactly would you know that? All the devices we might use to measure the rate of flow of time are themselves dependent on it. If, to external observer, the passage of time 'slowed' (meaningless phrase in this context) as it went on, we'd never notice, since our clocks and our very temporal perception would slow right along with it.

      --
      Dyolf Knip
    14. Re:so theoretically by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And where, for that matter, is my car?

    15. Re:so theoretically by SamSim · · Score: 1

      One theory which would explain the absence of evidence for time travel anywhere in history would be that there's a certain moment in time coming up in the future when the whole of the universe becomes instantaneously impermeable to time travel, and that this point is before the discovery of time travel (perhaps set off deliberately by its inventor). Of course, every optimistic time-traveller who ever tried to get past it would "bounce off" and reappear, all at once, a fraction of a second after this particular instant - could get crowded...

    16. Re:so theoretically by B1ackDragon · · Score: 1

      Hmmm, not exaclty sure if this is what you mean by "volumetric spirit flow rate," but just so you know alcohol is metabolized in a linear fashion.

      --
      The snow doesn't give a soft white damn whom it touches. -- ee cummings
    17. Re:so theoretically by kalidasa · · Score: 1

      D'Oh. Thanks for reminding me!

  17. How do we know by Bananatree3 · · Score: 0, Redundant

    That any of the participents aren't time travellers themselves!?!?

    1. Re:How do we know by ThisNukes4u · · Score: 1

      I believe that is the point...

      --
      thisnukes4u.net
  18. I went to it last year... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I went to it last year, it wasn't anything special.

  19. WYLD STALLIONZ! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Will there be parking for Time Traveling Phone Booths? If so... then whoa, dude. I'm like totally already there, man.

    1. Re:WYLD STALLIONZ! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Will there be parking for Time Traveling Phone Booths?

      In the back, next to the police boxes.

  20. I was there by sveskemus · · Score: 0, Redundant

    It wasn't all that great. I might not show up next time (i.e. in your "future").

  21. so naturally by Edmund+Blackadder · · Score: 5, Funny

    The place will be full of dozens of idiots dressed in spandex and insisting thet they come from the future.

    1. Re:so naturally by grungebox · · Score: 4, Funny

      The place will be full of dozens of idiots dressed in spandex and insisting thet they come from the future.

      Maybe spandex is all the rage in 3166.

    2. Re:so naturally by agm · · Score: 2, Funny

      It is. Or is that "was". I mean it will be,

    3. Re:so naturally by aarku · · Score: 5, Funny

      Well, to prove you're from the mind boggling far off future, a retail box of Duke Nukem Forever will be required to be presented at the door.

    4. Re:so naturally by Spy+der+Mann · · Score: 1

      The place will be full of dozens of idiots dressed in spandex and insisting thet they come from the future.

      Oh, but can they show you their Nintendo3D from 30 years in the future?

    5. Re:so naturally by ErikTheRed · · Score: 4, Funny
      Well, to prove you're from the mind boggling far off future, a retail box of Duke Nukem Forever will be required to be presented at the door.
      Dude, they probably won't be coming from that far in the future.
      --

      Help save the critically endangered Blue Iguana
    6. Re:so naturally by rawket.scientist · · Score: 1

      Dude . . . I am totally showing up unshowered, in animal pelts, and carrying a big wooden club.

      --
      John Hancock wuz here.
    7. Re:so naturally by sjbcfh · · Score: 4, Funny
      The place will be full of dozens of idiots dressed in spandex and insisting thet they come from the future.

      Oh, you mean like a Slashdot meetup?

    8. Re:so naturally by SubtleNuance · · Score: 1

      PERFECT!

      Its dadaism in all its beauty. Why doultnt you want to go? Too busy watching TV?

    9. Re:so naturally by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In the future it's called "Spandexeosite"

    10. Re:so naturally by beforewisdom · · Score: 1

      M.I.T. students in spandex?

      To quote Jonathan Harris ( "Dr. Smith" - Lost In Space): "Oh, the pain, the pain"

    11. Re:so naturally by Gibberx · · Score: 0

      Well, perhaps they could travel forward in time to get DNF, before travelling backwards to the party?

    12. Re:so naturally by dmatos · · Score: 1

      Wioll have been.

      --

      It may look like I'm doing nothing, but I'm actively waiting for my problems to go away.
      --Scott Adams
    13. Re:so naturally by nametaken · · Score: 1


      Real quick, someone press some bogus currency from 2009 and throw a handful in the air when everyones standing around in a group.

      They'll think they're right around the corner and get their asses in gear!

    14. Re:so naturally by Patrik_AKA_RedX · · Score: 1

      I wold prov I cam from the futur, problm is I cant fint a stor that sell botles of presurizd tritium and accept a Marsian Mastercard.
      (I hop I speled thse worts corect, Im nod used to writing anciend Englis)

    15. Re:so naturally by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      retail box of Duke Nukem Forever
      No no no... I want to see LaTeX version $\pi$ and MetaFont $\e$. Or a simple solution to P =? NP, or Reimann. An elegant solution to any hard problem would be nice.
  22. Let me guess... by Cap'n+Crax · · Score: 1

    This event is co-sponsored by Bellevue??

    --
    PK: 09F911029D74E35BD84156C5635688C0
  23. Paradoxes by jesterzog · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If no time travellers turn up on May 7th, will everyone stop promoting it after the date?

    Personally I would have thought it'd make sense to give a bit more advanced notice than a week, if only to give people a chance to get the word around more beforehand (thus more likely to be archived).

    1. Re:Paradoxes by BenjyD · · Score: 1

      Beforehand? It is a time travellers' convention...

    2. Re:Paradoxes by EvilTwinSkippy · · Score: 1
      Beforehand? It is a time travellers' convention...

      Well have you ever tried to get a flight plan through the Department of Chronology? My God, I swear they work in geological time. By the time you identify a decent jump site, historical identity profile, and escape point, you are too old to actually make the trip.

      Or if you cut a too many corners, you find yourself stuck years ahead of the date, killing time by trolling websites.

      --
      "Learning is not compulsory... neither is survival."
      --Dr.W.Edwards Deming
    3. Re:Paradoxes by jdhutchins · · Score: 2, Funny

      If no time travellers turn up on May 7th, will everyone stop promoting it after the date?

      No, it will be continually duped on slashdot until a time machine is invented. That way no one will ever forget about it, and the editors have an excuse for the dupe. MIT probably planned it this way becuase they knew slashdot would carry it for the next 50,000 years.

    4. Re:Paradoxes by Dr.+Manhattan · · Score: 1
      If no time travellers turn up on May 7th, will everyone stop promoting it after the date?

      Models of time travel based on relativity involve creating an area of spacetime where, basically, things are warped enough that moving in space in the right way moves you backward in time. Like a rapidly rotating black hole.

      These have the feature that you can't go any further back than when the area was first created (e.g. when the black hole was first 'spun up'). So if time travellers don't show up, it may just be that no naturally-ocurring areas of spacetime exist that reach back far enough. We certainly don't have the tech to make one yet, and won't for centuries minimum.

      More info here.

      --
      PHEM - party like it's 1997-2003!
    5. Re:Paradoxes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Those were my initial thoughts exactly.

      And then I realized that these people are expecting the convention to be a success, and are giving us a chance to attend so that we can spread the word about how cool it was afterwards.

      Of course, if no time travellers show up, then I don't expect that anyone will continue to publicize the event.

    6. Re:Paradoxes by ildon · · Score: 1

      Are you implying that Slashdot will not be archived?

    7. Re:Paradoxes by bromoseltzer · · Score: 1

      Doesn't matter. You can wait a few hundred years to do the publicity. If you want the best T traveler to non-T traveler ratio, don't publicize in the present at all.

      --
      Fiat Lux.
    8. Re:Paradoxes by Minwee · · Score: 1

      Well, is that date in the Julian, Gregorian or Clintonion calendar? Have we accounted for time skews and missing seconds? Those kinds of things add up over time.

  24. At Night? by cbelle13013 · · Score: 1
    Why would they hold it at night?

    When I'm a time traveller, I'm only going to come back in the morning, that way I get the whole day ahead of me...

  25. Fuck by erikharrison · · Score: 5, Funny

    I'm a time traveller. Unfortunately, you can't tell, because I travel through time with the help of an angel and an invisible lech, and the process causing me to appear identical to someone in the time I'm travelling to.

    Hold on, I have to go get this Erik kid married to his one true love.

    Oh boy.

    1. Re:Fuck by Aeiri · · Score: 3, Funny

      Al, what does Ziggy say my chances are?

    2. Re:Fuck by Pop69 · · Score: 1

      Sounds like a great idea for a tv ser........

      Um, never mind

    3. Re:Fuck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm also a time traveller, though perhaps a little slower than others. I travel into the future at a rate of exactly one second per second.

    4. Re:Fuck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      The parent's statement is absolutely true. Although it is a little known fact to acheive this rate of time travel one merely has to perform the following procedure. 1. Sit down on the floor cross-legged. 2. Repeat the following phrase, "O wah tena siam" 3. Repeat step 2 increasing speed each time until you have reached your destination.

    5. Re:Fuck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      *boink* *spronk* *boop*

      Sam, there's a 0% chance that Enterprise is coming back, and a 99% chance that your career is screwed.

    6. Re:Fuck by swv3752 · · Score: 1

      Stay a time traveller, in your future you become a crappy starship captain.

      --
      Just a Tuna in the Sea of Life
  26. imagine.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    all the wackey fun we could have with a load of seasoned time travellers........

    someone could bring einstein along, we could have hitler poised above a dunk tank, we could finally get some conlcusive evidence on the whole religion vs science debacle....

  27. It could be a ruse... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    It could be a ruse... the organizers may be stranded time travellers trying to send a message to the future to get rescued now. It may not be a genuine convention, but rather a lifeboat technique for the Insiders.

  28. THink again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    While this is a great idea, wouldn't it be better to create, say, a magnetic anamoly on the moon and place, say, a black monolith?

    After all isn't the earth a bit fragile for this sort of thing?

  29. I will have been there. by Flumbo · · Score: 1

    I belong to this: http://www.timetravelfund.com/

    1. Re:I will have been there. by flood6 · · Score: 1
      I hate to point this out, but it would be easy enough to test if that fund works. Just go find the guy that runs the website and kill him. If you do manage to kill him, it doesn't work.

      Just to be clear, I'm not suggesting anyone try to injure this guy, I'm just sayin...

    2. Re:I will have been there. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ummm, a less sociopathic and more fair method might be to join, wait 30 seconds after pressing submit and then try to kill yourself. If there's a knock on the door that would be money well spent. If not, well you don't need the money anymore, now do you? :)

    3. Re:I will have been there. by VoidWraith · · Score: 1

      Except that that's one of the exceptions to them wanting to come pick you up.

  30. uh by inKubus · · Score: 1

    Actually, I didn't read the article before I posted that so it makes no sense. I'm on glue, sorry. I did write the directions on a piece of paper and buried it in my backyard in a piece of PVC pipe with 2 end caps and a packet of silica gel.

    --
    Cool! Amazing Toys.
  31. fashionably late by potpie · · Score: 1

    Sounds kind of nerdy... er... I might be a little late....

    --
    Esoteric reference.
    1. Re:fashionably late by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fashionably late would be getting there in the year 2015.

  32. I went last year... by barfy · · Score: 0, Redundant

    It kinda sucked. Just a bunch of slashdot readers. I don't think I will go this year. Maybe next year after more people hear about it....

    1. Re:I went last year... by farmkid · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      > I don't think I will go this year. Maybe next year after more people hear about it...

      Uh, I think you meant:

      "I don't think I will go this year. Maybe the previous year after more people hear about it..."

  33. Publicity? by NitsujTPU · · Score: 0

    So, we only need to make this ad an ad that will be remembered for all of eternity in 1 week.

    Let me suggest that you advertise it using a laser light show pointed at the moon.

    (Was it Pepsi that considered doing this until it decided that it would piss off most of the planet?)

    Anyway, the global uproar should be big enough that at least someone will remember.

  34. Been there .... by notany · · Score: 1

    Been there, done that, got the t-shirt.

    Being the Veteran of the Bermuda Exploration Venture 1991-1953 this was really nice event to meet some members of our crew we thought we lost. Plenty thanks for great people in MIT for this heart breaking event.

    --
    Dyslexics have more fnu.
  35. You show up in the morning... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    to find parking in time for the convention.

  36. I went there next year. by Unknown+Poltroon · · Score: 5, Funny

    Its gonna be boring. But the after party they're planning last year kicked ass.

    --
    All Troll + "offtopic" mods are meta moderated as "Unfair", because you abused the system.
    1. Re:I went there next year. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You will mean the before party.

  37. All I can say is... by flyingsquid · · Score: 1

    ...watch out for guys wearing leather jackets and sunglasses, asking for "Sarah Connor".

  38. Google Map by prblaes · · Score: 1
    1. Re:Google Map by kschawel · · Score: 1

      http://maps.google.com/?sll=42.360007%2C-071.08787 0

      That exact same map was in TFA, except it was the satellite photo.

  39. I call it BS by gsasha · · Score: 1

    If a time traveler chose to come back to such conference, he/she would obviously come to the first one, as that of the most historic importance. If the first conference was held and none have shown up, this implies that time travelers are, alas, not going to come at all. Not necessarily that time travel is ultimately impossible, but it may be forbidden for some reasons.
    On the other hand, all this thing smells faintly of Douglas Adams. Parties come to mind, bricks and don't.

    1. Re:I call it BS by Flyboy+Connor · · Score: 1
      If a time traveler chose to come back to such conference, he/she would obviously come to the first one, as that of the most historic importance.

      "The first one" is only of historic importance if time is linear. But if time-travel is possible, time is not linear. So, for a time-traveller, "the first one" is NOT by definition the one of most importance.

      Personally, I think a time traveller will go to a party where there are lots of nice girls (doubtful at nerd central), or at least no interference of high-strung natives. So it will either be in a harem, or in the Jurassic.

    2. Re:I call it BS by Dyolf+Knip · · Score: 1

      Not necessarily. There are theoretical time travel methods that would allow you to travel into the past, but only to the point where time travel was invented in the first place. For instance, using a wormhole of which one aperature was sent on a relativistic trip. You can travel into the future where the ship has gone to, or you can travel back to where the ship was first launched, but no further.

      --
      Dyolf Knip
    3. Re:I call it BS by EEBaum · · Score: 1

      I don't know... if I was a time traveler, I'd probably show up to one of the later time travel conferences, just to throw them off, and it's quite likely that I'd be the only person to bother actually going to said conference.

      Even better, it would be extremely cool if I were to somehow invent time travel, keep it a secret, travel into the far future, find out when said conferences were held, and travel to one, say, 100 years AFTER I had invented time travel.

      --
      -- I prefer the term "karma escort."
    4. Re:I call it BS by gsasha · · Score: 1

      In which case, this conference wouldn't make sense anyway.

  40. marketing idea by British · · Score: 4, Funny

    You could have a Time Traveler supply booth running there:

    - Legit costumes for whatever era. WW2 uniform, peasant outfit, etc
    - Monetary exchange: buy/sell money from different eras, at varying rates. You will always need money(depending on the time)
    - Fake IDs. Going back 20 years? get an ID 20 years prior to your birthday
    - Fake license plates. Travelling in an old car back to an earlier time? Get "legit" license plates that are either from the same car, or just some convincing out-of-state plates.

    WARNING: Management is not responsible to disruptions in history.

    The sales possibilities are endless.

    1. Re:marketing idea by inKubus · · Score: 1

      Don't forget the Delorean parts...

      --
      Cool! Amazing Toys.
    2. Re:marketing idea by dtk13 · · Score: 0

      And You can start making money now from home!! Help convicts get fake ids, help people get out of speeding tickets, and more!!!! Just call 1-800-TME-CRAP or go to www.1800timetravel.info for your free guide to get started and make millions...
      (From the cheezy ad dept)

    3. Re:marketing idea by TodPunk · · Score: 1

      Endless and immeasurable. Not only do your repeat sales customers have the possibility of always purchasing at the same time (stand in line with yourself, and yourself, and yourself...) but when you make your accounting projections/statements, what time period do you use? A good CPA would just say "What time period do you WANT to use" and for once, that isn't shady!

      --
      This forum Sig is licensed under the LGPL.
  41. it was a hell of a lot of fun by wugmump · · Score: 1

    some of the speeches were really amazing. i especially loved the talk about hyper-relativity given by the guy from Olympus Mons U's department of temporal aesthetics.

    the snacks were a little anemic, though. i would have hoped the food planning to be a little better.

    but definitely a worthy event. glad i went.

    --

    "It's OK, my sheet's got a hole in it!"
  42. Vonnegut? by Limburgher · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    Anyone else find it amusing that the quote at the bottom of /. is currently from Kurt Vonnegut? :)

    --

    You are not the customer.

    1. Re:Vonnegut? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Its a random quote each time you load the page.

    2. Re:Vonnegut? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No it's not. If you reload it several times quickly, you'll see the same quote each time. The quote persists for several minutes.

  43. zerg by Lord+Omlette · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Even if someone time travelled into the past for a few seconds, wouldn't they wind up in the icy cold of space while the planet speeds along on its normal course around the sun?

    --
    [o]_O
    1. Re:zerg by inKubus · · Score: 2, Funny

      As long as you're travelling in time, you are in hyperspace therefore you can come out anywhere. Although you are right, you would want to calculate where you are going or you might end up in the _middle_ of the earth, which might be a little more unpleasant.

      Thankfully, with Windows 64-bit edition coming out, we have adaquate memory addressing capabilties to model all of these possibilities.

      --
      Cool! Amazing Toys.
    2. Re:zerg by fprefect · · Score: 4, Informative

      There are 2 things involved in 4-dimensional translocation:

      -- Reaching the exact coordinates at the right instant, considering rotation and revolution of the planet, solar system, and galaxy.

      -- Matching the velocity of that location (and timeframe) exactly.

      It's not only useless to appear at the right instant in the right room if your body doesn't exactly match the inertial frame -- it would be fatal. Forgetting to account for just the earth's revolution around the sun would slam the traveller against the wall at 30km/sec.

      --
      Matt Slot / Bitwise Operator / Ambrosia Software, Inc.
    3. Re:zerg by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Although you are right, you would want to calculate where you are going or you might end up in the _middle_ of the earth, which might be a little more unpleasant."

      Yeah, I hear there's orcs living there, and this evil wizard that wants to rule the earth with this magic ring or something. Probably not a place you want to visit!

    4. Re:zerg by iamatlas · · Score: 1

      I don't think that an ability to travel freely through the fourth dimension would negate a person's ability to travel proficiently through the first three, which we do already with minimal difficulty, and at varrying speeds.

    5. Re:zerg by kinzillah · · Score: 1

      yeah. precisely what I want determining if I wind up stuck in a wall or not.

      --
      Douglas P. Price
    6. Re:zerg by Repton · · Score: 3, Funny

      Even if someone time travelled into the past for a few seconds, wouldn't they wind up in the icy cold of space while the planet speeds along on its normal course around

      Nah, because the rotation of the solar system around the galactic core, combined with the movement of the Milky Way (propelled out by the big bang, and pulled on by the gravity of various neighbouring galaxies) just happen to exactly cancel out the movement of the earth. This means that we are, in fact, absolutely fixed in position in space.

      This is why the aliens keep coming here --- we are the only stable point in the universe where time travel can (safely) happen.

      HTH.

      --
      Repton.
      They say that only an experienced wizard can do the tengu shuffle.
    7. Re:zerg by cptgrudge · · Score: 1
      Of course, gravity wells may act as anchors in space-time, assuring you may stay "on average" near Earth's crust. I think you would want a flying vehicle, and calculations that put your relative position farther from Earth's center of gravity, so you don't intersect with Earth's mass. It's difficult to say exactly where the average center of gravity, your anchor position, would be since it could vary slightly, or more as your temporal distance grows longer. You know, since that 3 million tons of concrete (and the small amount of gravity its mass exerts) wasn't there 50 years ago when that city didn't exist in your timeline.

      I know nothing about this topic. I just had a thought. Probably from seeing too much Star Trek. Curse you Berman. Curse you!

      --
      Qualitas edurus commercium, nullus penitus net rimor, nullus deus beneficium
    8. Re:zerg by philge · · Score: 1

      only if there is a unversal frame of reference like ether. As ether has been out of fashion for a while I guess your travel in space would depend on the frame of reference used so you may well end up exactly in the same space

    9. Re:zerg by EEBaum · · Score: 2, Funny

      That's why you have to be going 88mph.

      Duh.

      --
      -- I prefer the term "karma escort."
    10. Re:zerg by sbaker · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The problem is - Einsteins theories don't permit a 'special' frame of reference. So you don't have any place to measure the 'absolute' motion of the earth *from*. Do you only consider the earth's motion in orbit around the sun - or do you also consider the suns' rotation around the galactic core? How about the motion of our galaxy relative to the other nearby galaxies? What about the expansion of the universe?

      There is no absolute coordinate to dial into...it's a meaningless concept.

      This is a severe problem for any kind of *discontinuous* time travel.

      For time travel into the past to function, it more or less has to work like time travel to the future does (the kind we're engaging in right now as we head to the future at a rate of one second of experienced time for every second of elapsed time).

      As you travel back continuously, your feet would still be resting on the surface of the earth - and still get dragged around by it. If you travelled backwards by simply experiencing time in reverse, there needn't be any physical problems.

      In 'The Time Machine' by H.G.Wells, that's exactly what happens. The time traveller sees things happening in the world around him - but rapidly and in reverse.

      Alternatively, if time travel were via wormhole/blackhole types of things - then the motion of the wormhole or black hole would be the only constraint. Once you can do that, finding the Earth again would simply be a matter of knowing how the earth and the wormhole had been positioned back in the time you went back to.

      Either way, it's not a problem.

      The ikky problems only come about with the kind in which: **ZAP** you disappear - then after 20 seconds of cheap special effects - **UNZAP** you reappear 100 years in the past - now, you have no frame of reference to go by and you could (presumably) pop out a long way from anywhere interesting.

      --
      www.sjbaker.org
    11. Re:zerg by jigyasubalak · · Score: 0

      U really think that the time travelers of the future
      haven't factored what you can think of in this
      spectacularly undeveloped world that you currently
      live in??

      ----------------
      Karma: Excellent! Currently seeing a cheerleader.

      --
      The best planning can be done after the project completes.
    12. Re:zerg by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Dude: I loved Escape Velocity. Believe it or not, I used to play it on my dad's IIcx... how's that for dedication? (Damn Capt. Hector)

      Haha.

    13. Re:zerg by Neurotoxic666 · · Score: 1

      would slam the traveller against the wall at 30km/sec.

      But I thought going 88 mph was sufficient..

      --
      You are more than the sum of what you consume. Desire is not an occupation.
    14. Re:zerg by swv3752 · · Score: 0

      There is an exact special coordinate: The Center of the Universe. Big Bang theory would say that everything is expanding from one spot and so that would be the center. Once that location is known, it is easy to develop a grid to plot out specific reference points.

      --
      Just a Tuna in the Sea of Life
    15. Re:zerg by Rubyflame · · Score: 1

      You don't need to invoke a "special" frame of reference to have "instantaneous" time travel. Rather, it seems most natural to suppose that you would maintain your present zero-acceleration frame of reference.

      So if I were on a world which was drifting through space at a constant velocity and not rotating, and I time-travel a day into the future, I shouldn't have any problems. If, on the other hand, I'm on a world which is accelerating (like the Earth), then time travel becomes unsafe.

      --

      All it takes is nukes and nerves.
    16. Re:zerg by CurbyKirby · · Score: 1

      There are 2 things involved in 4-dimensional translocation:

      -- Reaching the exact coordinates at the right instant, considering rotation and revolution of the planet, solar system, and galaxy.

      -- Matching the velocity of that location (and timeframe) exactly.


      Correct me if I'm wrong, but doesn't Heisenberg say achieving both is impossible? Perhaps we can get around that with small nonzero error margins.

      --

      --
      "Extra Anus Kills Four-Legged Chick" -- Headline
    17. Re:zerg by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm not sure if you are joking, but just to clarify, every spot is the center of the universe according to big bang theory.

  44. Story Idea? by scaryjohn · · Score: 1

    First, I thought: "Wow. That would be a great idea for a book." Then I remembered The Restaurant at the End of the Universe.

    --
    One might ask the same about birds. What ARE birds? We just don't know.
  45. What if... by kryogen1x · · Score: 1

    you're from the past and wish to attend?

  46. They left out elevation by iluvcapra · · Score: 1

    They left out the present elevation of MIT, thereby ensuring future time travellers will AVOID the convention, since they will instantly recognize it as a clever trick by the Morlocks, dwelling deep in their underground lair!

    --
    Don't blame me, I voted for Baltar.
  47. This can't work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There are 2 scenarios:
    1) nobody will come from the future. We'll notice that on the convention, so nobody will market this activity anymore. Nobody of the future will know about the event, so nobody will come (We already knew that).
    2) somebody will come. We'll notice that on the convention, but as we are all humans, nobody will market this activity after a year of so as we all are lazy bastards. Nobody of the future will know about the event, so nobody will come. This is impossible, so either we should rule out this scenario, ore else the universe will crash, god will notice the BSOD (A lot of our mad world is explained if you assume it runs under windows) , get mad, install linux/BSD or just buy a mac. Either way, our little souls will get erased from his hard drive along the way.

    OK, I admit: If you are really strange, you can consider
    3) they will come, but because of some time travellers limitation/regulation/... we will not be able to detect them. We are now back in scenario 1.

  48. Mod Up! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Haha! Thank you, "Professor Steetmentione." A "timely" joke, no less...

  49. I'll be attending by ChaoticLimbs · · Score: 1

    But it will be in an alternate universe. I will be coming back to my own time afterwards, but in yet one more alternate universe. Luckily, none of you will notice it. See ya there!

  50. i smell a con.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    by some broke engineering students who do not have any money for booze for an end of semester party. nice touch though.

  51. Paradox concerns by highfreq2 · · Score: 1

    In order to minimize the odds of creating a universe destroying paradox, the meeting will be held a sealed vault, and everyone will be automatically killed and incinerated immediately after the meeting. No grandchildren, no grandfather paradox.

  52. BEEN THERE, DONE THAT by drsmack1 · · Score: 1

    I dropped in on them the other day; it was totally boring; just a bunch of nerds yanking themselves. Don't know why I bothered. -Zaxxor, 2568 A.D.

    1. Re:been there, done that by SubtleNuance · · Score: 1

      Those loosers are nothing compared to the time we all went from 31337 d00d.

  53. Maybe I can create a sensation... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    by showing up in a "Chicago Cubs World Series Champions" t-shirt.

  54. Not Bloody Likely by the+eric+conspiracy · · Score: 4, Funny

    Pshaw... everybody knows that nobody goes to these things because they are too crowded.

  55. A bust by ONOIML8 · · Score: 0, Redundant

    I attended this, there wasn't a very good turnout and the food sucked.

    --
    . Quit playing Monopoly with Bill. Switch to one of many non-Microsoft products today.
  56. ummm... by budhaboy · · Score: 1

    So what was that disco floor thing a while back? Maybe it was they who were responsible for disco?

  57. Man... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I wish i could make it. But my Delorean was hit by a train :/

  58. Larry Niven Already Dealt With This by John+Hasler · · Score: 4, Insightful

    For a universe in which time travel is possible and the past can be altered by time travelers the only stable state is one in which time travel is never invented. Work it out.

    --
    Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
    1. Re:Larry Niven Already Dealt With This by SunFan · · Score: 1


      Imagine if a future version of Congress got a hold of time travel. If that ever happened, then future generations of Bushies would have come back and given Saddam a good phase pistol whipping. Therefore time travel is impossible. QED

      --
      -- Microsoft is the most expensive commodity operating system and office suite vendor in the marketplace.
    2. Re:Larry Niven Already Dealt With This by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You assume something about generations and future you shouldn't.

    3. Re:Larry Niven Already Dealt With This by hawkfish · · Score: 1

      Isaac Asimov's The End of Eternity dealt with this in 1957.

      John Brunner's Times Without Number put forward this solution in 1962.

      By contrast, Niven's essay is in All the Myriad Ways published in 1971. Niven is fun to read, but he is not very deep (I just finished rereading Ringworld so I'm not just idly flaming.)

      --
      You will not drink with us, but you would taste our steel? - Walter Matthau, The Pirates
  59. TARDIS by jangobongo · · Score: 1

    Message From: The Doctor

    If only I could get my TARDIS to work properly, it never seems to go to where (or "when") I want it. Anyone seen my sonic screwdriver?

    Maybe if I give it a good thump...

    *REEEskrrrREEEskrrrREEEskrrr*

    I'll be right there!

    --

    Sig cancelled due to lack of interest
  60. latitude and longitude? by helioquake · · Score: 1

    Hmm, in a few thousand years, the magnetic pole may be so off that the good ol' coordinate system may be redefined / out of existence? And the plate moves, too. Not to mention the Sun zips through interstellar place to make it even more obscure about where this event actually took place?

    1. Re:latitude and longitude? by Sebastopol · · Score: 1

      Would they even use England is degree 0 longitude?

      You'd probably have to send a map of the stars from the position of MIT, and account for the drift you mentioned, as well as changes in Earth orbit, solar orbit, galacitc drift, etc.

      Jeez, laeaving accurate coordinates for 100,000+ years is gonna be a toughie.

      --
      https://www.accountkiller.com/removal-requested
    2. Re:latitude and longitude? by kalidasa · · Score: 1

      The latitude-longitude coordinate system is based upon the axis of rotation, not the magnetic pole.

  61. 7 days - here then - be there yesterday by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They missed out the earths translation and rotation, translation includes the Hubble-Expansion

    and where went Parker when he jumped ..
    why he doesnt get timeoverlapped
    clone instances of himself (not the evil ones)

    Have you ever recognized that the display
    in the capsule never matched the "wooden-spoon spinning style" Parker was performing ?

    What happend to this tv-show where the
    timecop woke up at the Smithonian,
    in another dimension (contact possible
    through the newspaper archive

    ->

    (two different dimensions one newspaper ?)
    yes ... logical breaks and plot holes,
    and thats what common timetravelling lackes,
    but thanks we are living still, we can
    say

    the future isnt steady! , nor the future happend,
    nor has anybody performed a travel through space-time,
    but there is one final border of thinking,

    the happing of the future in every moment,
    but in quantitative (perhaps discreet timesteps)
    Planck-Time

    ->
    hunting the evil genius (there is minimum one evil
    genius everywhere!) Dr. Mordehai Zombie

    when I was Duke and cleaned up D.C. and
    the ATOMIC edition I must have missed them - with my RPG ! :)

    When I travel to the past, I will /. /. in new years eve 1999/2000 save
    fry, destroy the world and play
    D&D with all of you ppl. floating around
    with Al Gore !

    Al Gore invented the internet !! ;)

  62. I already attended it... by NoseBag · · Score: 1

    ....It will be quite a spectacle.

    --
    Cloned foods give the statement "We had that last week!" a whole new meaning.
  63. Transversing Space-Time. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I currently plan on transversing Space-Time in order to attend this. Does that make me a Time Traveler? After all, I'll have transversed approximately 6 days time from this moment to arrive there on time.

  64. Won't be attending, but wanted to drop you a note by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We would have loved to attend your function, but time travel is very expensive. So we went some place cool instead.

  65. I had this idea eighteen years ago... by anactofgod · · Score: 1

    ..while I was at college.

    Unfortunately, it devolved into YAKP (yet another keg party), instead. I had a hard time keeping my fellow collegians motivated and committed towards the party's original theme and goals.

    That, plus we actually wanted girls to attend, and we realized that girls from the present were more likely to show if we weren't actively advertising for attendees from the future.

    --

    ---anactofgod---

    "Equal opportunity swindling - *that* is the true test of a sustainable democracy."
    1. Re:I had this idea eighteen years ago... by swv3752 · · Score: 1

      You thought they were from the present. Notice how you can't find those girls again? :)

      --
      Just a Tuna in the Sea of Life
  66. Not precise enough... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    21st century amateurs! Let me see if I can bring this down to your level, monkey brain:

    What Earth datum? What galactic reference frame? What universal reference frame? Which hyperdimensional anti-collision beacon UID? And for heaven's sake, which 4 of the many dimensions do you mean us to meet you time-spatially at? You're not providing a unique answer.

    In the colloquialisms of the day: time travel isn't like dusting crops, boy.

  67. Been there. by wytcld · · Score: 1

    Done that.

    --
    "with their freedom lost all virtue lose" - Milton
  68. Done. by tidewaterblues · · Score: 1

    I have recorded the event in my journal. Someday, when it becomes the foundation of a great and powerful human civilization the likes of which no man can now comprehend the convention will be both well known and universally celebrated.

    --


    ...En að Besta Sem Guð Hefur Skapað Er Nýr Dagur
  69. Overlooking the expansion of the universe. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Everytime someone speaks to me about time travel, I always shrug it off as being possible, but where would the earth be ?

    travelling even a few hours or minutes into time also means the earth has changed position many hundreds of thousands (perhaps millions) of miles.

    It's pointless giving a reference to the lab in MIT, you really need a reference to where the earth is now !

    Why do people overlooks this simple, but obvious fact ?

  70. Don't Bother Going.... by TechnoGrl · · Score: 1

    It sucked.
    Food was awful and the hotdogs cost eight dollars. The only high point was meeting the First World President - when he offerred to supersize my meal I almost fainted!

    --
    ----- In Your Cubicle No One Can Hear You Scream...
  71. Just be careful... by Spy+der+Mann · · Score: 1

    you don't want Coop, Jamie and Kiva to appear in their giant robot (specially with Coop on the driver's seat).

  72. same location? by osmic234 · · Score: 1

    So what happens if all these time travellers materialise in the same location and time?

    42.360007,-071.087870 is very precise - on the order of 10 cm if I've done my (very quick) sums right.

    A good way to kill off any future time travellers.

    But then, you'd like to think that anyone who's mastered time travel will realise this and appear at some offset location. Otherwise the outcome will surely be a catastrophic rift in the very fabric of space and time itself!

  73. Been There by Bostonsox · · Score: 1

    Don't go, it's boring.

  74. All those nerdy dudes by wanebo · · Score: 1

    wanted to talk about was how they wished they had gone to CalTech.

    I will not be going back last year!

  75. They Don't Get It! by bunratty · · Score: 1, Insightful

    There's no need to publicize it beforehand. If no time travelers attend, there's no need to publicize it at all, since it would do no good. It seems like even the organizers of the event have no real understanding of what time travel to the past implies.

    --
    What a fool believes, he sees, no wise man has the power to reason away.
  76. Review of the event. by sirrube · · Score: 1

    This time around it was pretty boring. The highlight was when Scott Mc'Neal kicked over the punch bowl shouting 'Cowboy Neal Rocks', I have to say not many girls attended and it pretty much verified the fact that even geeks in the future are still un-appealing to the members of the opposite sex. Hopefully next year it will be better.

  77. Don't bother... by J.+Charles+Holt · · Score: 1

    ...the party's not all that great, and there's hardle any chicks.

  78. i don't see it happening. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    why would a time-traveller choose present time to reveal time-travelling is possible. may be in an another 200-300 years when there is less turmoil and people as a whole are not as selfish.

    i would still show up for the beer though.

  79. No thanks by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 1

    Let's see... a series of parties being planned by the kind of guys who are obsessed with things like time travel. Yeah, sounds like a blast. It's pretty much a given that there won't be any females around.

    --
    #DeleteChrome
    1. Re:No thanks by DylanQuixote · · Score: 1

      What makes you think there are not females interested in time travel?

  80. a paradox, watson by chalkoutline · · Score: 0

    "and will all come travel to it at some point in their illustrious time-traveling careers" Surely they'll all come to it at the same point?

    --
    There are 2 types of people in the world, those who find that stupid binary joke funny, and those who don't.
  81. I can't make it right now. by JumperCable · · Score: 1

    I'm too busy. I might have time to squeeze it in after I retire though.

    By the way, great idea. Make it as popular as possible so that everybody materializes all at once in the same place in a bloody mess. That's why we can't find any evidence of time travelers. They all died at the time-traveler's convention.

  82. Cool by Odocoileus · · Score: 1

    This definitely goes under 'you might be a geek if...'

    --
    ...
  83. when's the dupe scheduled? by justforaday · · Score: 1

    Are we going to get a dupe of this in two weeks?

    --
    I'll turn into a supernova and burn up everything. Well I'll turn into a black little hole and you'll turn into string.
    1. Re:when's the dupe scheduled? by SubtleNuance · · Score: 1

      yes.

      i on 05.17.05 and again on 07.12.06. Damned lazy /. editors .

  84. Big Mistake by rfc1394 · · Score: 1
    If he was trying to create something like this, he should have started publicizing it at least a year ago, in order for there to be lots of buzz. It's the sort of wacky idea that you can get all sorts of interest in, like UFO nuts and others. Perhaps get some corporate sponsors, or do something to give lots of lead time for something like this.

    I'm granting the validity of the premise here (I don't think it is arguable that you can't travel in time, I don't think the premise is provable one way or the other), but he should have started publicizing this last April, not wait until a week or two before the event, or start publicizing it less than two weeks before it happens.

    I am, of course, reminded of the humorous tag line, "The seminar on time travel will be held last week."

    --
    The lessons of history teach us - if they teach us anything - that nobody learns the lessons that history teaches us.
    1. Re:Big Mistake by EntropyMan · · Score: 1

      I'm granting the validity of the premise here (I don't think it is arguable that you can't travel in time, I don't think the premise is provable one way or the other) One way to prove it is to actually travel in time. Then it would be proven "one way", now wouldn't it?

    2. Re:Big Mistake by rfc1394 · · Score: 1
      Quoting myself:
      I don't think the premise is provable one way or the other
      I was referring to the concept of time travel being something which is in general theoretical and not proven until such time as it is actually proven by the creation of a device or capability that actually does so.
      One way to prove it is to actually travel in time. Then it would be proven "one way", now wouldn't it?
      True, but until someone is able to do it, it hasn't been proven and is mere conjecture one way or the other. Until Marconi developed a means to communicate through the air, the idea of such a thing as wireless was pure conjecture.
      --
      The lessons of history teach us - if they teach us anything - that nobody learns the lessons that history teaches us.
  85. Just wait... by Short+Circuit · · Score: 1

    ...until it's canceled for "administrative reasons."

  86. Quick question: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What if I'm late?

  87. Easier way is, "Time is an illusion" by cfalcon · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I think "Time is an illusion" is an easier way to say it. If you have a picture you and a friend are looking at, and he wonders if the right side can ever travel to the left side and modify things, you'd wonder what he was talking about. I would argue that time is like that: static if viewed from enough dimensions, available for observation (in theory) as one massive N dimensional statue.

    1. Re:Easier way is, "Time is an illusion" by Mercano · · Score: 1

      I think "Time is an illusion"...

      Lunchtime doubly so.

      --
      #include <signature.h>
    2. Re:Easier way is, "Time is an illusion" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's a book called The Planiverse by A. K. Dewdney about a 2-dimensional world. One of the cool things he speculates about is that for such a world, the 3rd dimension is time. He illustrates this (visualy, in fact) with the dimensional statue concept you mentioned. It's a great way to explain the "time is static" concept to people who aren't quite up on dimensional theory.

    3. Re:Easier way is, "Time is an illusion" by glesga_kiss · · Score: 2, Interesting
      It's not so much an illusion, it's more of an abstract. You cannot travel in time because there is no such thing.

      So, what is time? Well, it first started out as a way for man to determine when to plant crops. It later was used by man for navigation & transport, at a time where different villages were on different time zones (sundials). Now we measure it by counting the vibrations of an atom. The key thing is that man was present at each step. We feel so confident about it, we have even created a "Universal Time". This doesn't make it any more real or even universally relevant.

      When scientists say "time slows down" e.g. relativity, the way I see it is that your perception of time slows down. Your atomic vibrations change speed, relative to an external observer. But there is no way that can be seen as time travel.

      What I'm trying to say is that one only one time "exists", NOW! The moment when your eye's hit the N is now gone. It never existed really, but what we do know is that when your eyes got to it, the crystal in your watch had been counted to have vibrated X number of times since point Y. Besides, the grandfather theory, as others describe, completely discounts time travel, unless there are parallel universes with different timelines, which I doubt. The would need to be an infinite amount of them, and the count can only grow exponentially as "time" progresses.

    4. Re:Easier way is, "Time is an illusion" by FuzzyBad-Mofo · · Score: 1

      You cannot travel in time because there is no such thing.

      I beg to differ. I time travel every day. So do you. However, our time travel moves at a constant pace and only in one direction.

    5. Re:Easier way is, "Time is an illusion" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      However, our time travel moves at a constant pace and only in one direction.

      Actually, if you can change your physical velocity enough you can change the pace of your temporal travel. However, since most people live their entire lives on Earth, they don't experience this.

    6. Re:Easier way is, "Time is an illusion" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's a neat way of looking at it. I also find one aspect of space-time/special relativity really interesting. In "The Elegant Universe," Brian Greene points out that velocity in space-time is like a 4 component vector whose magnitude must always be c. So if we go fast enough in our 3 dimensions then the "time" component of this 4d vector is smaller in order to keep the overall magnitude of this 4d vector equal to c. But if the "time" component is smaller, that means we are passing through the time dimension at a slower rate... i.e. clocks slow down and all the other neat relativistic effects.
      I just think it's really neat that basically when you're sitting still you are actually traveling through the time dimension at the speed of light(if I correctly understand what Brain Greene and spec. relativity are saying). So wouldn't it be possible to travel in time in the reverse direction just as we travel in the reverse direction (opposite velocity) in our 3 dimensions? Would there be a meaning to "direction" as far as time is concerned. Perhaps time just spreads out uniformily just as space does (like an expanding sphere... big bang explosion, etc.) and then one particular radius would be a timeline and the sphere would be composed of infinite timelines.

      who knows.. but it certainly is entertaining to brainstorm about it :)

  88. Yeah, like the government won't be watching THAT by Brento · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If you were really a time traveler, why would you want to show up at a known place on a known date? The government would be waiting with an awesome arsenal of firepower, waiting to forcefully take your tools from you.

    Or if you're the big-business conspiracy theory type, substitute "government" for "private mercenaries."

    --
    What's your damage, Heather?
  89. that is very powerful concept by BigGerman · · Score: 1

    So if no one during this convention reveals him/herself to be the time traveler from the future we can be absolutely positively sure that time travel does (will) not ever exist!

    1. Re:that is very powerful concept by Luthwyhn · · Score: 1

      No, it only means that if at some point time travel does come about they either:

      - Don't know of this convention
      - Don't care about it
      - Aren't alowed to attend (time travel would surely be helluva regulated)

  90. Time travel is impossible by cortana · · Score: 1

    If it were, US Patent #1 would be for a time machine. :)

  91. Stock market future boy ....... by budword · · Score: 0

    Did the guy who came back in time to play the market show up at the party ? I read about some guy put less than $1000 into the stock market ran it up to over 800 million in 6 weeks, was arrested, and claimed he was from the future, never heard anything else about him, which got me thinking......

  92. Crashed Time Machine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Apparently somebody overshot temporally and crashed their time machine at the party coordinates, but much too early.

    Due to the incredible density of the, still unknown alloys, the Area 51 team had to leave the wreckage in place. It was spray painted black and the cover story of it being campus outdoor art concocted.

    Other attempts to move or otherwise camouflage the wreckage over the years have been attempted.

    The hope is that the temporal verion of AAA will show up at the convention and finally remove the eyesore.

  93. been there, done that by 2TecTom · · Score: 1

    don't bother, it was just a bunch of party animals from the year 3131

    go to next years, it's bigger n better

    --
    Words to men, as air to birds.
  94. A Geek Party? by ring-eldest · · Score: 1

    So... Assuming someone develops a means of travelling back in time, the first event they'll consider travelling back in time to witness will be an MIT party? Whee. I know the semester is wrapping up, but jesus, that's delusional.

  95. Slashdot is a kind of one-way time machine, too by GroeFaZ · · Score: 0

    It all makes sense: Inside a black hole, time almost stands still for the ones inside if somebody from outside could watch, ergo the time outside as observed from the inside is passing close to infinitely fast.
    The massive bandwidth-black hole that is /. greatly accelerates hardware decay outside of its event horizon, in servers as well as in the unlucky guy that has to pay the provider bill (gray hair, wrinkles, hunched back).

    --
    The grass is always greener on the other side of the light cone.
  96. Time capsules, anyone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Everyone, quick! Print out this article and bury it in a bombproof box in your backyard!

  97. It was quite fun... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    but tell them to get better beer, oh wait they did. Nevermind

  98. Genuinely curious... by bloxnet · · Score: 1

    Since there tend to be quite a few better informed people reading and posting on here, I thought I would ask a question that has been bugging me.

    I thought the first law of thermodynamics was that energy cannot be created or destroyed. Given this, I assumed traveling backwards in time would be impossible since the person or object going back in time would be introducing "extra" energy into a period of time. For example, say I went back into time, either if I was alive during this time or previous to it, wouldn't the energy that I take up/am made of be accounted for already? And wouldn't introducing the quantity of energy I was made of break the aforementioned first law of thermodynamics?

    I had actually just started thinking about this again after watching the movie Primer. I would really appreciate people with a lot better understanding of the sciences involved responding.

    1. Re:Genuinely curious... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course energy can be created. Otherwise how would there be any?

    2. Re:Genuinely curious... by Irashtar · · Score: 0

      You're not thinking in four dimentions! sure, you have extra energy in one time, but thats just the energy moveing around and overlapping temporaroly.

    3. Re:Genuinely curious... by Mycroft_VIII · · Score: 1

      Yesterday and tomorrow are still part of todays universe, and that rule applies to a closed system.
      You'd no more be in violation than if you moved a space heater 5 feet to the left than if you moved it to .5 seconds ago.
      Another way to see it is to consider that we're all moving foward in time at roughly a 1:1 ratio, yet this temporal motion violates no such rule.

      Mycroft

      --
      https://signup.leagueoflegends.com/?ref=4c3ed6600b6ea
    4. Re:Genuinely curious... by swv3752 · · Score: 1

      Else when you go back you displace an equal amount of matter/energy and that is sent back as your replacement.

      Lastly, maybe it would violate the Law of thermodynamics. It would be the most feasible means of doing an end run around entropy.

      --
      Just a Tuna in the Sea of Life
  99. Girls by Locarius · · Score: 1

    Any chance I could meet some hot girls there?

  100. I went last year by lheal · · Score: 1

    That's year 4053 your time.

    --
    Raise your children as if you were teaching them to raise your grandchildren, because you are.
  101. Cybernetic Ghost of Christmas Past from The Future by wahsapa · · Score: 1

    ... i was in the future and it was to late to RSVP

  102. Hey MCFLY! by Dan+Up+Baby · · Score: 1

    "Van Wilder? This is your cousin Marvin. You know that new party you've been looking for? Well, listen to this!"

  103. Is that a fact? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Actually Time Travel by itself is impossible.

    Says who? :-)

    The point being that the rest of your post isn't worth reading if you start off with an unsubstantiated statement.

    1. Re:Is that a fact? by loraksus · · Score: 1

      The Vulcan Science Academy

      (or whatever the Star Trek thing was called ;)

      --
      1q2w3e4r5t6y7u8i9o0pqawsedrftgthyjukilo;p'azsxdcfv gbhnjmk,l.;/
  104. Re:Yeah, like the government won't be watching THA by gatkinso · · Score: 1

    "awesome arsenal of firepower"

    Compare a Cherokee warrior to a fully equipped Royal Marine....

    --
    I am very small, utmostly microscopic.
  105. No party by m00nun1t · · Score: 1

    The after convention party would be a bit of a fizzer.

    Bouncer: "Can I see some ID sir?"
    Time traveller: "Sure"
    Bouncer: "Sorry sir, you need to be over 21, according to your ID you are -62 years old"

  106. Based on the coordinates given... by CompSurfer · · Score: 1

    It's happening here

  107. Queue Red Dwarf... by Chuck+Chunder · · Score: 2, Funny
    Lister: Hey, it hasn't happened, has it? It has "will have going to have happened" happened, but it hasn't actually "happened" happened yet, actually.
    Rimmer: Poppycock! It will be happened; it shall be going to be happening; it will be was an event that could will have been taken place in the future. Simple as that. Your bucket's been kicked, baby.
    --
    Boffoonery - downloadable Comedy Benefit for Bletchley Park
  108. I'm hungry. by LukaFox · · Score: 1

    I'm hungry. I haven't eaten since later this afternoon.

  109. time wobbles... by blackcoot · · Score: 1

    ... when it goes backwards. at least i think it does (this is a very vague recollection). something to do with split light beams and what not, or it may be in "a brief history of time."

  110. Don't bother. It was postponed due to rain. by vandelais · · Score: 1

    Just ask Joan of Ark. Noah's wife.

    --
    Game: Player 'Donald J Trump' now has AI skill level 'experimental'.
  111. I went a thousand years ago and it was boring... by adsl · · Score: 1

    ...all I found where these incredibly silly primitive types who actually thought time travel was interesting. It's so yesterday..... I even went to see Hitch Hiker's Guide to The Galaxy, now that guy..How the heck did he know so much? There is a rumor that he' a time traveller by the way.

  112. "The idea is to make it so famous ..." by Sai+Babu · · Score: 1

    Well they certainly didn't allow themselves much time for this task.

  113. Time tourism by rossdee · · Score: 1

    Aren't time trave;;ers likely to be more interested in important or spectacular events, like the crash of the space shuttle, the hindenberg, titanic, the surrender of japan at the end of WWII, and so on.

  114. I already went. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Don't go. It was boring so a bunch of us went to ancient Babylonia for the invention of beer.

    1. Re:I already went. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I had a great time, went about 30 years from now, came back for it....you should check it out.

  115. Re:Hmmm.... Explanation??? by NitsujTPU · · Score: 1

    Ok.

    I didn't get it, can someone explain?

    Is this just you saying that history changed... or is this something from a movie, or what?

  116. Ironic that I saw the movie "Primer" last night by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Basically a time travel movie where they figure out if they sit in this box running a device they invented, they go back in time about the same as long as they sit in there. Gets into the whole seeing yourself do things and trying to outsmart your future self. Pretty cool, check it out.

  117. this is about as 'clever' as .. by torpor · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    .. those 'rapture' idiots, trying to force the second coming with their phony wars, and 'cremation of care' ceremonies, and all that ...

    --
    ; -- the corruption of government starts with its secrets. a truly free people keep no secrets. --
  118. coordinates by Cruciform · · Score: 1

    Don't they need the coordinates of Earth relative to the "beginning of time" in order to reach the place? Otherwise there may be a cluster of Slashdotters from the future leaving a small trail of freeze-dried corpses in Earth's wake.

  119. WE'RE DOOMED!!!!! by Pandaemonium · · Score: 1

    So.. if no real time travelers show up to the convention, could that possibly infer that the knowledge of the convention was lost whenever the end of humanity came?

    That's it! Proof that we will be extinct... before we invent time travel! drats.

  120. Researchers checked for this kind of thing before! by InsomniaCity · · Score: 1

    I seem to remember a bunch of researchers carefully checked attendance figures at major events (such as the Red Sox winning the World Series) against the predictions, and they didn't find any discrepancy to indicate that people might be travelling back from the future to see it.

    So maybe at some point in the future, it becomes a crime to go back in time to attend specific events where you could be spotted, eg this time traveller convention.

    --
    You cant make anything foolproof, they'll only invent better fools.
  121. It was a bust by MEGAGatchaman · · Score: 1

    Only 6 people even botherd to show.. Skip it. G~

    1. Re:It was a bust by Mycroft_VIII · · Score: 1

      The sad thing is that it was the same guy 6 times, kept asking where the 'hot past type babes' were.

      Mycroft

      --
      https://signup.leagueoflegends.com/?ref=4c3ed6600b6ea
  122. Proof of global warming? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If global warming (ok, or an asteroid) wasn't going to destroy all like on earth in the next 100 years, we would have already met time travellers. Humans never had time to invent time travel. Doh!

  123. If you came from the future.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    ..why didn't you get first post?

    1. Re:If you came from the future.. by periol · · Score: 1

      time travel makes you a little "slow", if you know what i mean...

  124. If I was an illustrious time-traveller... by Daniel+Ellard · · Score: 1
    and will all come travel to it at some point in their illustrious time-traveling careers.

    If I had an illustrious time-traveling career, I'd probably be able to think of a lot of better places to be than hanging around an MIT courtyard. Unless the yet-to-be-discovered laws of temporal travel includes an unfortunate law for the conservation of boredom, of course.

    --
    Disclaimer: I work for a company, but I don't speak for them.
  125. Universal Symbol for 'Great Party Here+Now' is ... by rewinn · · Score: 1

    ... Easter Island's stone heads.

    Lasting for 10,000 years, they offer a language-independent warning of what you felt like the morning after.

  126. Re:Hmmm.... Explanation??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Making fun of the misspelling.

    Nobody ever talks about "Mr. Hitler", but when referring to some random male by last name, you'd say something like "Mr. Hilter".

  127. One little detail people NEVER consider by Thaelon · · Score: 1

    One little detail people NEVER consider when talking about time traveling.

    Let's say you can time travel.

    Let's say you come back from 50 years from now to this event.

    You missed the earth by several million miles and are now effectively spaced.

    The earth moves people. So does the solar system. So does the galaxy!

    Even if you could travel through time if you couldn't manipulate where you came out you'd be boned.

    --

    Question everything

  128. No Girls by republican+gourd · · Score: 0

    The only sad truth to emerge from this entire convention... There aren't any women in the future.

  129. THE LOOPHOLE that lets this happen by goombah99 · · Score: 1
    Given all the problems with time travel altering its own future one has to escape this paradox. One approach is to design the conferrence with plausible deniability.

    FOr example, it occurs on april 1, and everyone is required to wear a mask. That way no matter what you said about the future there would be enough kooks at the meeting making prognostications that yours would be indistinguishable at the time. The masks would prevent the contemporary kooks from being identified and thus the future folk identified by process of elimination.

    perhaps everyone could be issued a time-coded hash key, so they could prove to the people of their own (future) time period that they had been there.

    --
    Some drink at the fountain of knowledge. Others just gargle.
  130. Re:Hmmm.... Explanation??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Actually, it's a reference to a Monty Python sketch where Hitler and Himmler stay in an boarding house under the assumed names of "Mr. Hilter" (sic) and "Mr. Bimmler".

  131. Stepping on butterflies by jjsaul · · Score: 1

    Will they each step on a ceremonial butterfly?

  132. Re:Hmmm.... Explanation??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative
  133. Re:Hmmm.... Explanation??? by Brian_Confucius · · Score: 1

    Not to mention "Ron Vibbentrop" and "Mr. MacGoering".

  134. Maybe... by marcosdumay · · Score: 1

    But you still can be your own great great grandparent.

    1. Re:Maybe... by Zeroko · · Score: 1

      Were that true, it would explain why some people fail at suicide.

  135. To quote the Ghost of Christmas Past(?) from ATHF by handmedowns · · Score: 1

    I would've RSVP'd but it was too late, for I was already in the future.

    --
    The road between democracy and tyranny is paved with secrecy in the name of security.
  136. The best opportunity for procrastination ever. by PopeOptimusPrime · · Score: 1

    I promise that in every work I ever publish, I will include the information about this convention. Also, this will conclusively prove that I will never invent a time machine. Because when I do, I intend to come directly back to the convention. Look for me, I'll be wearing futuristic garb, advertising a futuristic corporation by the name of, "MacroScotch" and I'll be drinking...

  137. decimal degrees? by serutan · · Score: 1

    42:21:36.025N, 71:05:16.332W (42.360007,-071.087870 in decimal degrees

    "decimal degrees?" But we haven't used that system since... oh wait.

    1. Re:decimal degrees? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > "decimal degrees?" But we haven't used that system since...

      Since the International System of Units (SI) was adopted.

      If I'm not wrong, and please be kind to correct me if otherwise, that should be more appropriately expressed in radians.

    2. Re:decimal degrees? by Grimxn · · Score: 1

      How can I say this nicely - you are nearly right :)
      Radians are the SI unit of angle, but they are not the international (or even any national) standard for geographical coordinates. The document you need to read is the International Standards Organisation's "ISO 6709:1983" which defines the standard. The Open GIS Consortium also should have material on coordinate representation.

      Have you ever tried working in radians for map coordinates? Ouch! it's difficult (I have, for reasons that are too arcane to go into).

    3. Re:decimal degrees? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thanks for the explanation -- and for being nice :-D

      Indeed, Geography is not my forte.

      I just can imagine you had to do a lot of arithmetic with coordinates. Babilonian number bases are confusing, too, I imagine.

  138. Dupe! by earthbound+kid · · Score: 1

    I'd give the link, but it's in the future.

  139. If time travel is possible... by Dixon+Uranus · · Score: 1

    ...then if anyone does travel back in the future to attend the conference, they will be here when it occurs the first time. Call me crazy, but I believe that things happen only once in time...

  140. use newsgroups by Fuzzums · · Score: 1

    I actually found a msg I posted over 15 years ago on a BBS in some usenet archive.

    --
    Privacy is terrorism.
  141. Re:Yeah, like the government won't be watching THA by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

    Because the government won't take it seriously and won't show up (or rather, "didn't" -- you know that because you're from the future).

    --

    "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

  142. convention? i see.. by bridgey655 · · Score: 1

    I would go, but my tardis is on the fritz.. *kicks* ah there we are.

  143. References by Yolegoman · · Score: 2, Funny

    But what you could do is slip into an alternate universe which is exactly like ours, only 60 years behind. Once there you could kill Hitler and alter History... but only in THAT copy of the Universe.

    Where are referenced Universe instances when you need them?

    1. Re:References by CableModemSniper · · Score: 1

      [Universe retain];

      --
      Why not fork?
  144. I can't make it :( by RichardX · · Score: 1

    I want to go to this, but I'm busy when it's on.
    Guess I'll just have to try and make it to last year's convention instead.

    --
    Curiosity was framed. Ignorance killed the cat.
  145. Disruption? Moot point. by Mag_Linnard · · Score: 1

    I'm a firm supporter of the parallel time theory. To elabourate:

    Every possible instance of history has happened and is happening, simulatenously and infinitely. It's like billions and billions of points, forking from each other with motion of every molecule.

    1) You can't disrupt it, because any possible scenario is already being applied somewhere. Even if you change things, you've simply moved current events to an alternate path--the original one is still progressing transparently.

    2) You can't eliminate your own future or past, because your instance of "you" is created by a series of events that will continue to exist. When you go forward again, you'll wind up right back where you left.

    Sure, it's full of holes. Science fiction (or semi-fact or hypothesis or whatever) is like that. Putting stock in theory derived primarily from a Christopher Lloyd movie is futile.

    --
    It's not the voices in my head that annoy me. It's the psychosies they invite over for parties that annoy me.
  146. If he hadn't... by Yolegoman · · Score: 2, Insightful

    He wouldn't be around to decide whether or not to go back in time and do her.

    Obviously, he went back in time. Pervert.

  147. First post! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Or it would've been, if all those time travelling bastards hadn't gone back and posted before me.

  148. Most likely by pyth · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Most likely, a time travel path would be along a line of freefall (geodesic). ie. Imagine if you could fall through the ground, wobbling back and forth from one side of the planet to the other.

    For any given initial velocity, there would only be certain periodic times when you *wouldn't* end up inside the planet. And the position on the planet where you come out would also be problematic. If you're not satisfied with those precise times and places, then you can adjust your velocity a tad, to get another set of options.

    If you're in orbit then you have much less to worry about.

    1. Re:Most likely by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude, these people invented time travel. They're hot shit: they're not going to be worried about lines of freefall or geodesics. I mean, geez.

  149. Old news! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    May 7, 2005?

    Been there, done that....

  150. Just go back... by Yolegoman · · Score: 1

    exactly 31556925.9747 seconds in time, and you will show up in exactly the same place you left, albeit a year before.

    Multiply by how ever many years you want to go back, and pray there isn't some sort of obstruction that you might beam into.

    1. Re:Just go back... by cortana · · Score: 1

      But the Earth's orbit is not perfectly repeated year after year. Not to mention the fact that the sun is rotating around the centre of the milky way, which is moving through space relative to all the other galaxies... etc etc.

      I maintain suspension of disbelief while reading time travelling stories by reasoning that time travel is pretty damn difficult, making sure you come out where you want to is probably easy by comparison.

    2. Re:Just go back... by Necroist · · Score: 1

      You've forgot to minus off the time that was lost during the Dec. 26 Earthquake.

    3. Re:Just go back... by xxx_Birdman_xxx · · Score: 1

      One word..

      TELEFRAG!

      --
      Live in your skin. Keep changing the scenery.
  151. Millions of Time Travellers Will Be Killed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    While they are careful to provide the exact location of the convention relative to the current location in time of planet Earth, that spot moves through our relative space in time like a 3D spirograph gear.

    On the day of the convention, point your telescope roughly toward Orion, and you might be lucky enough to make out a central cluster with a long looping trail of time traveller bodies popping into space and exploding in vacuum at the approximate coordinate where Earth will be when time travel is discovered int he future.

  152. Not worth the time by fprefect · · Score: 1

    I stopped by the convention last week, but there weren't enough attractive girls and the beer was flat. I left after about 30 minutes for a party that was really flying.

    --
    Matt Slot / Bitwise Operator / Ambrosia Software, Inc.
  153. Re:Yeah, like the government won't be watching THA by kalidasa · · Score: 1

    Compare 20,000 Zulu warriors to 2,000 fully equipped royal soldiers. Compare a force of about 1700 Lakota warriors to a force of a little under 800 US Infantry and Cavalry. Sometimes the best armed group doesn't win, if the force with superior firepower is surprised, and the technologies aren't too far apart.

  154. Temporal Cold War by teslar · · Score: 2, Funny

    This is where it started. A couple of Sullibans attended (they really are party animals once you get to know them), but unfortunatley one present-time Enterprise fan thought they were just other geeks in a costume and poured his beer over their heads.

    That kinda sparked it, really. We told Bermann that showing history programmes before the events actually happened was really not a good idea, especially given how his documentaries polarise against de Sulliban but that's Rick for you. When he was a kid, he showed the moon landing to Jules Verne, who was rather impressed.

    But no worries about the Temporal Cold War. Admiral Daniels will be dispatching Archer to stop the party from happening, thus preventing the onset of the war. Some of you present-timers might actually look forward to this, as it will result in the purging of all Temporal Cold War references from the documentaries Bermann has slipped into your time.

    Shame about the party though. It really was a good laugh. Well... would have been.

    1. Re:Temporal Cold War by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      "This is where it started. A couple of Sullibans attended (they really are party animals once you get to know them), but unfortunatley one present-time Enterprise fan thought they were just other geeks in a costume and poured his beer over their heads."

      Dude, nobody watches TREK anymore. If you are going to reference *The Time War,* then reference the proper one on a television series that people actually are watching. DOCTOR WHO.

      Trek is dead, Jim.

  155. What difference do Earth coordinates make? by narcolepticjim · · Score: 2, Interesting

    If a time machine uncouples itself with the current time, wouldn't the planet spin away from it in its orbit? You might turn up at the right time, but in the wrooooong place.

  156. What a party that was - I was there last nite by hine_uk · · Score: 1

    ...great beer buttoo many geeks and some guy with a birdcage on his head.

  157. Re:Yeah, like the government won't be watching THA by BluBrick · · Score: 1

    Compare a Cherokee warrior to a fully equipped Royal Marine....
    OK, comparison made. Now compare several hundred similar Cherokee warriors to the same fully equipped Royal Marine...

    --
    Ahh - My eye!
    The doctor said I'm not supposed to get Slashdot in it!
  158. Re:TT is possible by LinuxRulz · · Score: 5, Funny

    Watever everyone says, time travel is possible. The thing is you can only travel to the future and it is incredibly slow...

  159. nah by x2A · · Score: 1

    cuz not publicizing the event could be the reason that no one turned up!

    -2A

    --
    The revolution will not be televised... but it will have a page on Wikipedia
    1. Re:nah by WhatAmIDoingHere · · Score: 1

      Just by thinking "We should publish this event and see if people show up" and people don't call before you publish it to RSVP, you can be sure that it failed. From the future. In.. science.

      --
      Not a Twitter sockpuppet... but I wish I was.
    2. Re:nah by bunratty · · Score: 1
      You still don't get it. It's to be attended by time travellers. It doesn't matter when you publicize it, as long it's before the time travellers leave the future. You can publicize it 100 years after it happens, and time travellers can still show up.

      But if the event has already passed, and no time travellers showed up, then it can't do any good to publicize it. You already know that the publicity failed, and nothing you do can make it succeed.

      Therefore, why not wait until after the event has passed before you try to publicize it, so you don't waste any time with publicity that you already know ahead of time will fail?

      --
      What a fool believes, he sees, no wise man has the power to reason away.
    3. Re:nah by x2A · · Score: 1

      And where did you study the effects of time travel? No it doesn't matter when it's publicized, as long as it does get publicized. Not publicizing beforehand, and then deciding to not-publicize after the not-successful event, will lead to doubt over whether no one turned up because it wasn't publicized. Just because the not-publicizing occurs after the not-successful event, doesn't mean that it isn't the cause! We are talking about travelling back in time here.

      -2A

      --
      The revolution will not be televised... but it will have a page on Wikipedia
  160. free food by Aerion · · Score: 1

    If you come from the future, please bring food.

    Many of us are almost out of cash for the term. :(

    Oh, and bring alcohol too.

  161. Re:Yeah, like the government won't be watching THA by timeOday · · Score: 1
    The government would be waiting with an awesome arsenal of firepower, waiting to forcefully take your tools from you.
    As I understand it, there are no tools to take because you can't bring anything with you, not even clothing. For this reason it may be wise to place the convention near a gay bar where a variety of outfits can be stolen.
  162. Belated Attendance by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

    I will have been there, eventually.

    --

    --
    make install -not war

  163. Please Read This... Re:Paradoxes by templest · · Score: 1

    I was about to mod some posts but decided to reply to this instead. :-/
    Why would anyone promote this after the date if nothing happened?
    If the party was (will be?) a success, then people from the future will show. If no one shows up, It's because either:
    a) We already failed at promoting it adequately, or
    b) We never obtained the ability to travel through time.

    Someone a few posts up best described it with: "It's just the simple fact that a thing didn't happen and your actions in trying to change the past are already part of history."

    --
    I'm a signature virus. Please copy me to your signature so I can replicate.
  164. Doc, I'm from the future. by rice_burners_suck · · Score: 1
    And what's to stop me from strolling right in there and telling them that I'm from the future? After all, if I know about it and I go there, I'll be there when it takes place.

    That's right... I'll tell them all about what the future is like... The United States has 85 states with the addition of Cuba following Castro's death, Mexico's 33 states following the Mexican Purchase, and Puerto Rico's conversion into a state.

    The neverending mid-east tensions have been reduced with the joint purchase of Egypt's Sinai, which was split into two and given to Israel and the Palestinians so each have their own state. The economy of most Middle Eastern countries had all but collapsed following a major shift from oil to other forms of energy with simultaneous drilling in Alaska and increased oil production in Latin America, so after being bailed out by the United States, these countries now mass-produce superconductors for efficient delivery of electricity.

    All highways are buried underground in tunnels to clean up the clutter in cities; In many areas, there are several levels of these highways. Nobody drives anymore; cars are driven by computer at speeds in excess of 150 miles per hour. A drive from Los Angeles to San Diego during rush hour takes roughly 30 minutes.

    Microsoft? They make business software such as CRM, ERP, etc., but no operating systems, office suites, games, or other stuff. Had to sell it all because the alternatives kicked their ass. Longtooth was a big disappointment in light of huge advances made in Linux and the Mac.

    There are two large cities on the moon, mostly used for production of cheap energy and medical drugs. There is an effort in place to build over 100 cities on Mars after discovery of large gold caches, Martian diamonds, silicon, and other materials needed for industrial and consumer use.

    Chances are, they won't believe me, but I could bring pictures. Yes, I am actually from the future, but while here on a business trip (you know, dumping my stock in Microsoft and buying up tons of General Motors stock), I met the love of my life and had to move over here permanently.

  165. Been there, done that. by Etherwalk · · Score: 1

    'nuff said.

  166. Needs work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This year's convention was OK, but next year's was better.

  167. It was good! by Qetu · · Score: 1

    I just came back after the gig and i had a great time. If you ever want to check it out, please do so.

    I'm now going to the theatrical release of A New Hope, dressed as Qui-gon. I just like in-jokes.

  168. Adding to that... Re:Paradoxes by templest · · Score: 1

    Why would anyone promote it after the event either way? If someone shows up, is there any need for promotion? It already happened.

    --
    I'm a signature virus. Please copy me to your signature so I can replicate.
  169. Drifting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes, but where is this convention going to be in thousands of years once the continents have drifted a bit?

  170. Think me stupid but... by RavenChild · · Score: 1

    Think me stupid but... If we are trying to go forward and advance ourselfs, isn't it ironic how we want to go back?

  171. Organizers don't understand time-travel by drwho · · Score: 1
    From the web site:Unfortunately, we of the present (2005) don't have time travel....

    Time travel either exists, or it does not. There is no question of 'having' it in a year, or not. Are any methods of traveling into the past well known in 2005, here on earth, among homo sapiens? no. By its very nature, powerful time-travel tends to be kept quiet, John Titor not withstanding.

    This shocking ignorance of the basics in time-travel caused many time-travelers to scoff at the event. Nontheless, it is useful as a 'zero point' reference.

    Now, if you'll excuse me, I am going to lay down some hundred-year old wine to bring to the event.

  172. Finally... by Dave21212 · · Score: 1


    Finally a party that my wife *can't* possibly make me late to...

    --
    "Whoever would overthrow the liberty of a nation must begin by subduing the freeness of speech."--Benjamin Franklin
  173. Re:Yeah, like the government won't be watching THA by YrWrstNtmr · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Will there be an 'awesome aresenal of firepower' at the MIT campus next weekend? Highly doubtful. In either case, a time traveler from the future will know if the FBI/CIA/Army/corporate mercenaries showed up.

    The correct tense might be "The government troops didn't show up, so it's safe to go."

  174. Hm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If traveling through space takes time, does traveling through time take space?

  175. Re:TT is possible by koreaman · · Score: 1

    LOL. Mod parent up.

  176. They once had a website... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They once had a website where they said if you paid $10 they'd put it in savings and in a few thousnad years the intrest would have made it into a fortune, and they would use that fortune to pay for a trip back in time to pick you up.

    I was chatting about this with a friwnd on ICQ and told him I just sent them my $10 and was waiting for them to pick me u...

    He got a good laugh when I logged back in a few minutes later. :-)

    1. Re:They once had a website... by Ph33r+th3+g(O)at · · Score: 1

      Amusing, but estuary laws would keep that $10 from growing into anything significant before the state got its grubby hands on it.

      --
      I too have felt the cold finger of injustice.
  177. Why time has only one direction - causeless events by backdoorstudent · · Score: 1

    If there are events that happen without cause (i.e., fundamentally random events) then running the clock backwards will not be merely a replay of the same events in reverse. The random events are noise that always tend to increase entropy. Time will always flow in one direction. This means that there is no way to get back.

    http://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0101088/

    Now, as far as we can tell all quantum mechanical events are causeless (i.e., fundamentally random). Anyway, if there are not causeless events then we get either an infinite regress of preceeding causes or closed causal loops.

    So do not expect that you will meet any real time travelers.

  178. errrr... by cacoe · · Score: 1

    if time travel is possible, wouldn't every moment in time be filled with time travellers? theres a lot of future for time travellers to be born :O

  179. This *is* the dupe by Namarrgon · · Score: 1

    The original will be posted tomorrow.

    --
    Why would anyone engrave "Elbereth"?
  180. I already attended this year's event by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It was OK. Attend the one in 2010 - it's a blast.

  181. Where you'd end up by sanosuke001 · · Score: 0

    I have a question about time travel. I don't know if anyone else asked it, because there's 300+ replies and I'm not going to read them all, but if I went to a "when" but didn't move from where I was, wouldn't I end possibly VERY far from where the earth is at that time since we move through the universe, not to mention around our star? Just seems even if we can get time travel to work, we wouldn't be able to go back to earth without faster than light travel anyway... but then we'd have it if we did travel time, so I guess it's all good :/

    --
    -SaNo
  182. Reminds me of this quote. by jack_canada · · Score: 0

    "A seminar on time travel will be held 2 weeks ago."

  183. Like that guy in HHGTTG (the book) by Quarters · · Score: 1

    I'm going to come back in time to that convention and tell all the attendees that, no, none of them ever get laid.

  184. Take some pictures by nrlightfoot · · Score: 1

    Someone take some pictures and post them online later. I want to see if I show up at the conference.

    --
    what sig?
    1. Re:Take some pictures by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why not post the pictures now?

  185. Something is wrong with this reality by GoddessEvilena · · Score: 1

    I am glad I decied to show up for the Time Travelers' Convention a week early. I have been spending the last few hours reading the news. Apparently George W. Bush is the President of the United States and over 90% the home computers in the world are run by Microsoft operating systems. This demonstrates the dangers of time travel. I hope all the 'geniuses' at M.I.T. are proud of themselves. Anyway, I am off to try try and fix things. You people can keep this strange altrernate reality.

  186. Question about Time Travel - Movement of Earth? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have a question about Time Travel that's always been bugging me... theorethically, if you travel through time, do you chnage your space coordinates? Since the Earth is constantly rotating and moving around the Sun and Sun is moving around our galactic center, if you traveled back in time (or forward), Earth would have moved and you'd appear in an empty space (most probably). Is there a way to compensate for that?

  187. It is just me? by furry_marmot · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Now I like a good sci-fi story as much as the next guy and love to watch my wife lose her mind over the loops a writer will go through to make a time-travel story "work". But a few years ago, something occurred to me which I don't think I've ever seen in any story anywhere. Mind you, this is more of a literary sci-fi critique, since time travel probably isn't possible for the many reasons laid out here.

    So let's say you have yourself an Acme Time Machine, and it works. So you set it to transport you back in time 24 hours. Has no one ever considered that the earth has moved? Assuming for the moment that time travel is possible, if you do not calculate precisely where the earth is, and the location you want to go to, then you will most likely end up in space, but with a nasty possibility of "arriving" inside the earth (or possibly even the sun or some other body).

    A time machine would have to also be an instantaneous space travel machine, capable of transporting you anywhere in the universe. I mean, if you can magically transport yourself the 17,640 mi (28,224 km) the earth will have moved in 24 hours, then whatever principle it uses will probably transport you over much greater distances.

    1. Re:It is just me? by KillerBob · · Score: 1

      According to Spider Robinson, time travel has been invented 3 times.

      The first method was a belt invented in the early 21st century. It had two knobs, one for time, one for space. It was indeed an instantaneous space travel belt as well as time, but required a great knowledge of physics and math to be able to operate successfully. Only one such belt was ever built.

      The second method was a device invented in the late 27th century. It was widely used for a short while, and then fell out of use. Not much is known about it, except that its major advantage was that it automatically corrected for the shifts in space.

      The third method doesn't appear to use any machinery at all. The user just "thinks" their destination, and they are there. This is the method used by Mike Callahan, Lady Sally, Mickey and Mary Finn, Nikola Tesla, and Jake Stonebender's daughter, Erin.

      More information is available in Callahan's Con, one of Robinson's better books. (though I still prefer Callahan's Lady and Lady Slings the Booze above the rest) :)

      --
      If you believe everything you read, you'd better not read. - Japanese proverb
    2. Re:It is just me? by entrigant · · Score: 1

      OK, Lets assume it takes you 24 hours to travel 24 hours into the past. This is as much an assumption as anything related to time travel is, but it is a reasonable one I think. If you view space and time the way Einstein did, then our foreward movement through time is movement through a dimension. The same as moving in a space dimension. If we go in the reverse direction of time at the same speed time moves foreward then lets assume you are also not moving in any space dimension going backwards through time. More importantly lets assume that if we ARE moving through a space dimension then our backwards march through time is even slower, therefore it would take longer then 24 hours to go back 24 hours. We are also assuming that while you are moving backwards in time relative to your surroundings the theory of relativity still holds, and time is still moving foreward for you.

      Then, assuming you are correct that the earth has moved 17,640 miles in 24 hours, then you would have to move 727.5 miles per hour to keep up with your location. This is by no means an extraordinary feat. What messed you up I think is the idea that time travel would be instantaneous. I am not sure how you arrived at this conclusion, but I find it unlikely traveling through time would be any more instantaneous than traveling through space. The trade off would be the faster you are moving through space the slower you will move through time, whether you are traveling foreward or backward through time.

      In the end time travel is so highly theoretical that any excuse you can find why it isn't possible can be countered with an equally theoretical reason why that isn't a problem. I guess the real fun is can you find the reason why the excuse you came up with is not a good excuse. You gave up too early I think. You average person would probably come up with next the classic "what if you met yourself and killed yourself" act. There are many ways around that problem. I leave it as an excerise to the reader to either find one of those ways, or come up with a more convincing reason why time travel could not be possible :).

    3. Re:It is just me? by Aerion · · Score: 1

      You're assuming that a time-traveler stays at a certain absolute position while time-traveling. That requires that you assume a fixed universal frame of reference. Such a thing doesn't exist.

    4. Re:It is just me? by ZeLonewolf · · Score: 1

      Your assumptions are ignorant of basic 20th century physics. Repeat after me:

      Space is relative

      That's right, there is no such thing as being "stationary" except with respect to another object. This, of course, brings an interesting dilemma to the time travel problem because space is shaped differently at different values of time, so a frame of reference at one time cannot even be described at a different time.

      Say your time machine is sitting on the ground on, essentially, a bunch of molecules. Suppose that at the time you travel to, those same molecules of dirt have been blown around such that they're scattered amongst a 300-mile radius. Where does the time machine land?

      Then, there's the conservation of mass problem. How do you account for the fact that a time machine would have to instantly displace a bunch of matter (even if it is mostly air) when it magically appears? Where does that matter go? Is it instantly pushed to a point outside of the time machine's physical space at the speed of light? If so, it would create a terrifying shock wave.

      Yeah, you could say there's a number of physics problems with regards to time travel.

      --
      "If at first you don't succeed, lower your standards."
    5. Re:It is just me? by Jack+Schitt · · Score: 1

      Simply problem and solution. Execute the time travel in a vacuum. Unfortunately, there cannot be guaranteed vacuum at the destination. Have the vehicle appear outside of the atmosphere. The shockwave caused by displaceing material in solar wind is not nearly as bad as displacing a similar volume of, say, air.

      --
      This message brought to you by Jack Schitt's Previously Shat Shit
    6. Re:It is just me? by rcbarnes · · Score: 1

      Actually, Isaac Asamov addresses this problem (of location) in one of the short stories in "Robot Visions." It's actually considered primarily in the other direction: forward in time (presubably because all past states are easier to know than future). Regardless, it's treated as somewhat important problem in this piece, and the solution involves relativity as in to the other reply's point.

      --
      "Fight for lost causes. You may discover they weren't."
    7. Re:It is just me? by Mycroft_VIII · · Score: 1

      Personally I prefer the original trill^h^h^h^h err collection of three books containing short-stories.
      The following books are pretty good too. Though there was something timeless (as in not fixed in any specific time, just happing) about the original three books worth of short stories, except that last one, but I won't spoil the ending.
      Let's just say that though they are quite funny (well they do save the world a few times, all without leaving Mike's bar.) they also say a few pretty good things about the basic nature of humans. I just hope thier at least half right about how decent we are inside.
      I do like a few ideas I saw in those books, First is paying favors forward. Second is the concept that shared pain is pained lessened and that shared joy is joy magnified. And third is random acts of kindness.
      I can't recomend the series highly enough.
      they are Just google Callahan and Spider Robenson.
      You could also see if your isp has the usenet groop, alt.callahans iirc.

      Mycroft

      --
      https://signup.leagueoflegends.com/?ref=4c3ed6600b6ea
    8. Re:It is just me? by ZeLonewolf · · Score: 1

      You still have the frame of reference problem...how does the vehicle know where to appear? Since there's no universal frame of reference it could appear anywhere in the universe it would seem.

      Awesome nick, by the way. The Thursday Next series rocks...

      --
      "If at first you don't succeed, lower your standards."
    9. Re:It is just me? by Jack+Schitt · · Score: 1

      it could use the frame of reference of itself.

      x = timemachine.x;
      y = timemachine.y;
      z = timemachine.x;
      time -= timemachine.timeoffset;

      --
      This message brought to you by Jack Schitt's Previously Shat Shit
  188. Re:Yeah, like the government won't be watching THA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Will there be an 'awesome aresenal of firepower' at the MIT campus next weekend?

    No, but I'm sure there will be agents observing. They might as well.

    In either case, a time traveler from the future will know if the FBI/CIA/Army/corporate mercenaries showed up.

    That assumes one specific theory of space-time travel.

  189. TrantorCon in 29,999... by dankna · · Score: 1

    Lazarus Long says, "I'll be there! Will you?"

    If nobody even remembers this time-traveller's con from less than twenty years ago, it hardly seems likely that the MIT one is going to meet its thousand-year goal either.

    Nice try.

  190. I for one welcome our new Time Overlords by wheatwilliams · · Score: 1

    I for one welcome our new Time Overlords.

    1. Re:I for one welcome our new Time Overlords by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In Soviet Russia, our new Time Overlords welcome you.

  191. Groundhog Day! by scovetta · · Score: 1

    #3 - Like Groundhog Day?

    Seriously though, how about this idea: You can go back in time, but you don't go back in your own "universe"-- you branch off (like a new CVS branch) which starts out as a copy of your branch. You change something (breathe, step on a bug, etc), your changes go to the new branch. This means that there's no "kill your grandfather" paradox. Unfortunately this also means that you can't go into the future, since there's no way to choose which branch you'd follow). (You could put yourself in "suspended hibernation" and that would probably be close enough).

    The other point about this is that every instant, new branches are being created (with every event), so there's not one static time-line, but rather a huge tree of time-lines. YOU happen to follow one of them based on one set of decisions and events that happen.

    I think it's a bit Startrekkian, but whatever, it makes sense to me, and I don't like the whole, "I'm my own father" complaints.

    I've got to get back to my time machine now. The Mets are likely to have a good season finally in 2431.

    --
    Wer mit Ungeheuern kämpft, mag zusehn, dass er nicht dabei zum Ungeheuer wird. --Nietzsche
    1. Re:Groundhog Day! by EvilTwinSkippy · · Score: 1
      I think the Greeks had it right. Causes and Effects are two ends of the same line. No matter what you end up trying to do in mucking with the past, the Universe is going to pull a "I meant to do that", and it will turn out that your meddling was the impetous that set events into motion in the first place.

      [bamf]Na weil da maches mal ist eine[bamf] temporary disruption to the time-space continuum, it's more like a hiccup [bamf] quello persist fino a che il sistema non possa radrizzarsi. Pensi esso gradiscono [bamf] an equilibrium reaction.

      Besides we would never be able to tell if time was changing around us.

      --
      "Learning is not compulsory... neither is survival."
      --Dr.W.Edwards Deming
    2. Re:Groundhog Day! by Wyrmw00d · · Score: 0

      I can tie you a noose, but you'll have to do the rest bud. *kiss*

  192. Re:Yeah, like the government won't be watching THA by Trogre · · Score: 1

    ... or substitute "private mercaneries" with "Al-Quaeda".

    --
    "Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife
  193. Re:Yeah, like the government won't be watching THA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A "fully equipped" Royal Marine would probably have at least a light machinegun with several spare boxes of ammo. If the Cherokee warrior miniatures didn't start in base contact with the Royal Marine miniature they would probably fail their morale check before pressing home a charge.

  194. Asimov Worked That Out Before Niven Did by kalamazoo904 · · Score: 5, Informative

    Read "The End of Eternity" by Asimov... he also alludes to the episode in other books.

    --
    Your friendly neighborhood nitpicker
    1. Re:Asimov Worked That Out Before Niven Did by lxs · · Score: 1

      Actually, Asimov read the Niven book, went back in time and wrote his own book.

  195. 12 Monkeys by robertjw · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Actually, that is a misrepresentation of the movie. It does not do anything silly like gun-jamming or heart attack. What's interesting (partial spoiler) is that Bruce Willis' character actually generates the reason for him being sent back in time. It is one of my all time favorite movies due to the complex story nature, Bruce Willis and Brad Pitt's excellent acting ability and Terry Gilliam's genius. Ultimately the mission is accomplished and the people from the future do change the past. Of course the story ends there, so we don't know how the timeline is effected...

  196. No by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Nope, he accidentally brought back a C64 instead of the IBM 5100 and is banned from returning to the past.

  197. Pardon me if it's been said already, but... by sdornan · · Score: 0

    If there's a well known time traveler convention being held in 2005 AD, why would we have to wait 1000 years for someone to go show up? I mean if you believe in all this "time travel" stuff, there is no present, past or future - there is only the time line you yourself are a part of. If "time travel" was real, this is not the first convention. In fact, in this line of thinking, there have already been tens of thousands of conventions.

  198. Re:Yeah, like the government won't be watching THA by Hockney+Twang · · Score: 1

    Dude, I think you and I both know that the U.S. military functions as a group of private mercenaries for our corporations, so the distinction is entirely unnecessary. Besides, you can't beat people from the future, if you steal anything from them, they just inherit from you when you die anyway.

  199. One fear... by aXis100 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Seeing the location depicted so accurately, I have only one fear...

    Telefrags.

    1. Re:One fear... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wouldn't that be timefrags?

  200. Suggested improvement to your experiment in the f by amiable1 · · Score: 1
    Dear Sirs;

    Thank you for your brilliant idea for an experimental test of the hypothesis that one of a certain number of forms of time travel will be invented in our future light cone, in the form of the "first" time travellers convention.

    I have a suggested improvement to your experiment.

    As Marvin Minsky has estimated, the smallest form with a level of mental complexity similar or greater than our own (representing say 10^15 bits of information changing at 10^12 bits/second would be about (10^4 nm)^3 or (10 micron)^3, i.e. about the size of a single cell. The time travel vehicle would presumably be a little larger.

    Furthermore, as he has suggested it might be very much energetically advantageous to send a much smaller vehicle and passenger back. Finally, hundreds to thousands of years in the future of human beings, the optimal size of humans may be engineered to be much, much, smaller in any case as one of only a few possible solutions to the malthusian problem of overpopulation, and the second order problem of loneliness (see http://anotherview.memebot.com/ ) for a little more on this.

    Therefore, the coordinates of your convention are insufficiently precise, for the most likely attendees. Rather, the "convention center" should be scaled for attendees of various sizes Therefore, I propose the following modification of your experiment: 1. place (at least) a light microscope in your convention hall 2. advertise the (4-local) spacetime coordinates of its specimen stage widely, but make the precision and accuracy of these coordinates relative to the size of the entity coming to visit, e.g. for organisms of size 1-3 meters, the resolution of coordinates you have given seem to be fine. For smaller organisms/entities advertise more precise coordinates.

    Regards,

    Seth Goldberg

  201. RSVP please by Tharkban · · Score: 1

    Of course attendence will have been RSVP only. Otherwise there would not have been enough pizza for everyone who is coming. Everyone knows that that convention was famous for the pizza it will serve.

    --
    Tharkban (It is a signature after all)
  202. Darn, I missed it by raider_red · · Score: 1

    I was going to drop in from 2025, but the mail was late delivering the invitation. Damn if the post office just doesn't keep getting slower in the future.

    --
    It's good to use your head, but not as a battering ram.
  203. StarDate by shift8key · · Score: 1

    -318348.17

  204. I am guaranteed anonymity? by CamelTrader · · Score: 1

    I would hate to meet myself due to the awkwardness that causes.

    --
    Your .sig is important to us. Please hold.
  205. Blasé by halcyon1234 · · Score: 1
    Meh, who cares? Didn't time travel parties go out of fashion five days from now?

    No one important goes to time travel parties anymore. Come on, we all know how that party will turn out. It's going to be that one lonely guy who shows up a hundred a fifty times so he can try every single pickup line in his book. And he's just going to get rejected a hundred a fifty times, then all of him will get drunk, unruly, and finally the temporal cops will show up and have to drag the hundred and fourty nine of excess copies of him away.

    Meh.

  206. Exactly Right! by aggies11 · · Score: 1
    As anyone who watched the finale of Star Trek: The Next Generation knows:

    The answer to the age ole riddle: What came first, the chicken or the egg?

    Is:

    - The chicken travelled back in time to lay the egg!

    To generalize a bit further? The final event culminating in the end of the Universe, will likely cause some sort of Temporal annomaly, where the universe itself, travels back in time to "create" itself.

    Aggies

  207. Just Like Last Time by not_hylas(+) · · Score: 1

    You all said that last time too.

    Remember?

    http://www.phys.uconn.edu/faculty/mallett.html

    --
    ~hylas
  208. cant make it (or can i?) by indy_Muad'Dib · · Score: 1

    im deguassing my flux capacitor, somebody remind me in 20 years so i can get there on time.

  209. as predicted in Cat and Girl by runcible · · Score: 1

    in case it hadn't already been pointed out

    http://catandgirl.com/view.php?loc=131

    --
    remember the wisdom of Mahatma Gandhi: If enough peasants die horribly, someone will probably notice
  210. Setting the date to sometime in the past by Corpus_Callosum · · Score: 1

    Setting the date to sometime in the past is a *much* better idea, because it can be empirically analyzed.

    First, we must pick a location and time that a very large collection of people, many acting and possibly looking out-of-place, would not stand out as strange. Large city-parks are good candidates.

    Second, we must begin the effort (in earnest) to get the information out that such an event will be occurring (in the past).

    Third, once it is clear that the marketing has been widely performed enough to ensure that it is *locatable* in the future, we should go look at newspaper clippings from the time in question and attempt to find a gathering such as that which we organized.

    --
    The reason that it can be true that 1+1 > 2 is that very peculiar nonzero value of the + operator
    1. Re:Setting the date to sometime in the past by AvitarX · · Score: 1

      Except that assumes a single times line where every alteration that can be made has been and you can't change the future etc. (like 12 monkeys).

      But if there are multiple time lines then our past cannot be altered by the present or the future, in which case when people go back in time it will not be into our past but into someone elses. So the date must be in the future.

      --
      Wow, sent an e-mail as suggested when clicking on "use classic" banner, and got a fast response that addressed my msg
    2. Re:Setting the date to sometime in the past by Corpus_Callosum · · Score: 1
      Except that assumes a single times line where every alteration that can be made has been and you can't change the future etc. (like 12 monkeys).

      But if there are multiple time lines then our past cannot be altered by the present or the future, in which case when people go back in time it will not be into our past but into someone elses. So the date must be in the future.
      Actually, it assumes no such thing. In fact, such an idea could be used to test that hypothesis (in a way). If one discovers that such an event did actually occur, then it clearly shows that both time travel is possible (and did occur) and that it occurred in your timeline.

      The idea of infinitely branching quantum realities is profoundly disturbing. That, of course, does not mean that it isn't true. But it is disturbing in the extreme. Why isn't my awareness following a more rewarding trajectory through my quantum probability space? Is it that elusive thing we call choice? Which plane of reality do the choices get made? All of them?

      I am telling you man, this is very disturbing so I must ignore it. ;-)
      --
      The reason that it can be true that 1+1 > 2 is that very peculiar nonzero value of the + operator
    3. Re:Setting the date to sometime in the past by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This sounds like a brillian idea to me. Let's set it for the peak of Mardi Gras in New Orleans, 2004.

      I've already checked the papers from that time period, and it does looke like a large number of out-of-place looking people showed up.

      Success!

    4. Re:Setting the date to sometime in the past by Corpus_Callosum · · Score: 1

      I've already checked the papers from that time period, and it does looke like a large number of out-of-place looking people showed up.

      Someone looked out-of-place at Mardi Gras? Really?

      That is weird...

      --
      The reason that it can be true that 1+1 > 2 is that very peculiar nonzero value of the + operator
    5. Re:Setting the date to sometime in the past by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yep, there were at least a dozen people in attendance who could walk straight lines and remember where they put their keys.

  211. Time travel by amaiman · · Score: 2, Funny

    Ugh, time travel discussion.

    Queue fifty pages of "Yes, I could kill my own grandfather." "No, you couldn't!" "In Soviet Russia, time travels you." "First Post!" "No, this is the first post, I traveled back before you posted yours", and so on...

    Convention's a neat idea, though :-)

  212. I tried to hold one of these... by Fortran+IV · · Score: 1

    on the third Saturday of August, 1969, but for some reason nobody came.

    --
    I figure by 2030 or so my 6-digit UID will be something to brag about.
  213. Simple Logic by sellin'papes · · Score: 1
    This time travellers convention brings up some interesting logic situations worth exploring. Because we have never seen a time traveller in the current history of humanity (or exposed one) we can assume one of the following is true:

    1. Humanity will never discover time travel

    2. Time travel will never be available for public use

    3. Only a few time machines will be created before they are destroyed, or humanity itself is destroyed.

    One of these statements about the future of humanity is true, or else we would have exposed an almost infinite number of time travellers.

    --
    This is my last post.
    [6th Estate]
    1. Re:Simple Logic by Jack+Schitt · · Score: 1

      4. Travel to locations prior to the existance of the time-machine is impossible or otherwise prevented in some way.

      --
      This message brought to you by Jack Schitt's Previously Shat Shit
  214. Couldn't get hotel rooms at a decent price by billstewart · · Score: 2, Funny

    Really, they've got to schedule it sometime in advance so they could arrange for hotel room space. A few people will show up yesterday anyway just to grab the weekly rate, but they'll probably bop in, hand over their credit card, and not spend much time in the room until next weekend. And the waiting line at Mary Chung's will just be outrageous...

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
    1. Re:Couldn't get hotel rooms at a decent price by espressojim · · Score: 1

      Even in the future, people know Mary Chung's is good eats? That's excellent.

      -Jim
      (cambridge is my hood)

    2. Re:Couldn't get hotel rooms at a decent price by Mythrix · · Score: 1

      Will credig cards from the future be usable? Surely their accounts wouldn't be existing yet. And we don't even know if the currency from the future would still be the same.

      Although, I guess the time travelers could always bring a sports almanac to make some money...

    3. Re:Couldn't get hotel rooms at a decent price by Minwee · · Score: 1
      What's that? Your credit card from the future hasn't been issued yet? That doesn't need to be a problem. Simply use the card to purchase something small and valuable, like gold, plutonium or a box of old pinball machine parts, and bring that with you. Once you are in the past sell it to acquire temporally local currency.

      For bonus points make sure you sell it to the same people you were-going-to / had-already bought it from.

      Worried about how to cover the credit card bill? Don't be. Just invest a small amount of your 2000-era cash in Taco Bell stock so that you will be able to pay off your future credit card balance once you return.

    4. Re:Couldn't get hotel rooms at a decent price by sickofthisshit · · Score: 1

      Mary Chung's is OK, but after about 2011, it really dropped off.

  215. lololol! by femtocat · · Score: 1

    that's all.

  216. Please let me know... by mbone · · Score: 1

    ...if you see me there.

  217. Time & Space travel? by cove209 · · Score: 1

    How does time travel account for the fact that the earth moves again?

    1. Re:Time & Space travel? by EEBaum · · Score: 1

      We do not discuss it with outsiders.

      --
      -- I prefer the term "karma escort."
  218. Conference review by SiliconEntity · · Score: 2, Funny

    I attend the "Time Travel" conference, but it is a near-disaster. As far as I can tell the conference is spectacularly devoid of time travellers and instead is full of wannabees wandering around speculating about time travel. Worse, there are glitches at the registration table forcing people to wait in long lines as the students try to get organized. The "food" leaves much to be desired as well, what there is of it. And about the conference sessions, the less I say, the better.

    It certainly doesn't compare with the twin millennium celebrations on December 31, 999 and 1000, where the hostesses pull out all the stops to outdo one another. Now, those are parties!

    1. Re:Conference review by advocate_one · · Score: 1

      yes, as time passes, your memories can only get better...

      --
      Donald 'Duck' Dunn: We had a band powerful enough to turn goat piss into gasoline.
  219. Its an experiment. by amiable1 · · Score: 1

    Whether or not one expects it, this is an experiment, and is probably worth doing, given the miniscule cost. Theory may say "no go", but theory here is very weak

    1. Re:Its an experiment. by backdoorstudent · · Score: 1

      Yes it's worth doing, but why would a time traveler show up there and not at historical events? So when no real time travelers show up what does it mean? Here are some possibilities:

      1. It's not possible or just a conceptually incoherent idea.
      2. It is possible but we will never achieve it.
      3. Those that achieve it are so advanced that they can visit us without us ever knowing.

      In my opinion time travel is conceptually incoherent.

  220. Eminent Failure Paradox by xquark · · Score: 1

    This will fail, because it would need at least
    one trawler to come back. For one traveler to come
    back it would need to be popular in the first place.

    Hence the chicken or egg scenario.

    Eminent failure paradox is all around us people, there
    is no getting away from it.

    Arash Partow

    --
    Arash Partow's Philosophy: Be a person who knows what they don't know, and not a person who doesn't know.
  221. Parking at the Convention by Punchinello · · Score: 1

    Where should I park my DeLorean?

    --

    Remember... ZG9uJ3QgZm9yZ2V0IHRvIGRyaW5rIHlvdXIgb3ZhbHRpbmU=

    1. Re:Parking at the Convention by Jack+Schitt · · Score: 1

      Depending on whether you have the hover conversion or not, I'm inclined to only suggest that you DON'T park next to anything. Those gull-wing doors are quite anti-productive as far as allowing you to easily exit the vehicle when parked near just about anything.

      --
      This message brought to you by Jack Schitt's Previously Shat Shit
  222. Re:Yeah, like the government won't be watching THA by YrWrstNtmr · · Score: 1
    ...one specific theory...

    If time travel does indeed become possible, and if these potential future time travelers deign to show up at this particular event, they will know of this event by MIT or press historical records. They would also know (by the following days historical record) of the (non)presence of govt troops waiting to apprehend and interrogate them.

    What happened on Boston Common, May 7 1905? Dunno, but if I were really interested, I could find out. Especially if there were a large police presence around a college party. Finding out the details from a party in 2005 from 2105 or 2205 or 3005 would presumably be easier. Especially a party aimed at the future me.

  223. Re:TT is possible by soft_guy · · Score: 1

    You call one second per second slow?

    Also, you can change the rate of time travel by adjusting your speed.

    --
    Avoid Missing Ball for High Score
  224. Stupid Earthlings by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Vulcan Science Directorate has concluded that time travel is impossible.

    1. Re:Stupid Earthlings by antispam_ben · · Score: 1

      The Vulcan Science Directorate has concluded that time travel is impossible.

      I presume that no Vulcans will be attending The Convention.

      --
      Tag lost or not installed.
  225. Art Bell by Emperor+Cezar · · Score: 1

    I know the best way to get a bunch of wierdos to go to it. Have it announced on Coast to Coast AM.

  226. X, Y, ***Z***, Time, money and politics by starglider29a · · Score: 2, Interesting

    When you gave the coordinates, you neglected to give the "altitude". You may want to have a big safety net over and at the bottom of a big pit, for those who don't have their "Heisenberg Compensators" correctly adjusted. After all, this period is rather high in Uncertainty.

    Ok, but all Star Trek allusions, temporal fugues and jokes aside... how WOULD you specify altitude to a person in the future? Sea Level is not a constant, and not particularly well documented as it rises and falls. I suppose you could use the GPS, but that prolly won't still be in the sky when time travel already became possible (Future Past Tense).

    Also, what about currency? How are you going to set exchange rates even with future humans? PayPal points? Beer?

    One more thing... How do you think the Dept. of Homeland Security will feel about an sudden rush of 'temporal aliens'?
    --
    "Everything is defined in 6 Dimensions: X, Y, Z, Time, Money and Politics"

    1. Re:X, Y, ***Z***, Time, money and politics by evanbd · · Score: 1
      how WOULD you specify altitude to a person in the future?

      GPS is the answer, even if the satellites aren't there. The GPS spec defines a "Geodal Height." Mu understanding is that if you assume a rotating uniform spheroid you get a well-defined (almost spherical) shape. There's an altitude from the center that corresponds to where "mean sea level" ought to be, modulo assymetries. Specify altitude relative to that, and anyone who can manage to sort out lat / lon coords ought to be able to figure it out.

      Also, what about currency? How are you going to set exchange rates even with future humans? PayPal points? Beer?

      That one's easy, and at least as old as non-free beer -- tell me a good enough story and I'll buy you a beer. And if you have a legitimate lack of currency, explaining why is probably good enough :)

    2. Re:X, Y, ***Z***, Time, money and politics by Grimxn · · Score: 1

      Dearie me! It's not just altitude that's missing, of course! There's a whole pile of other information that is just assumed...

      Let's start with units (amusingly, the poster thought that specifying "decimal degrees" as well as sexagesimal was clarification)... just naming a unit is not enough - who these days remembers how long a Scotch Ell is? Degrees are not God-given, any more than Fahrenheit is, so an explanation of what a degree is would ensure better comprehension so many eons in the future (past?).

      Then we move on to the axes of the coordinate system... where is zero longitude? Is it the Prime Meridian that runs through Greenwich? Or the one that runs through Paris? Or Rome, or Oslo or any one of a dozen that have been used in the past? And what about sign? American surveyors, disappointed that the Europeans considered America to have lowly negative longitudes reversed the convention and considered west positive and east negative until only a few years abo (whoops! how inexact considering this may be read in 1,000 years time!).

      At the risk of boring you all to tears, we need also to define which datum & spheroid we are using, for latitudes require us to "know" where the centre of the earth is, and what shape it is - this requires mathematical modelling, and there are scores of different models - not a big error compared to using the wrong Prime Meridian, but still a few hundred metres on the ground for the "same" coordinates (the cause of several US military blunders - take coordinates from local map, assume they are WGS, program missile, fire, miss - why Gaddafi is alive today).

      Many of you will say "Ah! But GPS sorted all that confusion out! Nowadays we all use WGS84, and it's all defined in the DoD's book!" and you would be right, nearly. Ignoring irritations like the leap-seconds, the non-linearities in the equation of time, precession & the Milankovitch cycles that will all make it VERY difficult to recover the actual position of satellites in the 21st century once a few millenia have passed, we still have one big gotcha - folk raised on Star Trek think that coordinates refer to positions in space - or perhaps in a rotating frame like a planet's surface, and maybe in the future they will, but on earth, they refer to, quite literally, ground positions - GPS still depends on transferring coordinates from the fixed ground reference stations.

      Why is this important? Because the ground moves. Specifically, if your time travellers are coming from Europe, they must take account of the integrated continental drift vector that moves Greenwich and New York apart by 25 metres per century!

      :>

    3. Re:X, Y, ***Z***, Time, money and politics by Rolgar · · Score: 1

      Why does everyone assume that when you time travel, your arrival destination will be relative to the nearest interstellar body mass (i.e. Earth)? What if the destination is relative to the center of the galaxy, or more likely, the center of the universe. Maybe all the time travellers from the future have been twarted by ending up in outer space, light years away from where they wanted to be. Anyway, bring at least a space suit, and hope you don't end up too close to a star.

      Further, how are the laws of conservation not broken if you are able to go back in time. If you are on planet earth, moving through space, and you end up on earth, but at a time when earth is moving in a different direction than when you left, maybe you'll be flattend by a pancake or flung into space.

      In theory, time travel is interesting, but not actually likely to be a success.

    4. Re:X, Y, ***Z***, Time, money and politics by zippthorne · · Score: 1

      Do not define "altitude" Instead, define radial distance from center of mass. Surely your mass-o-meters on your hot-rod-o-time can figure that out?

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
  227. You too? by Tony · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I've read through their discussion and changelog, I think one more person coming along with "Shh! grownups are talking" will yet again be met with "if someone believes it for whatever reason, it's a valid opinion" line of thinking.

    Yeah, it's a rather strange phenomenon. "Fair and balanced" means presenting both sides of a case, even when one side is obviously right (or at least more right), and one side is wrong. The John Titor case is one of those (obviously a very artful hoax). Intelligent Design vs. evolution is another. Both John Titor and Intelligent Design are attractive falsehoods (at least, attractive to some people). That doesn't make them right, or even viable.

    I mean, if I claim that I have invisible aliens called Dvutels living in my attic...

    Jesus, you've got those, too? How do you get rid of them? I've been using invisible Raid, but that ain't working.

    --
    Microsoft is to software what Budweiser is to beer.
    1. Re:You too? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ACK! I had to reply to this to undo the Flaimbait mod that I accidently gave to this message!!! >_

    2. Re:You too? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      that deosnt work if you psot as an AC, you dikc.

  228. Or this... by Lendrick · · Score: 2, Funny

    Going back in time and changing the past is akin to trying to lift yourself up off of the ground. Both are equally impossible and equally silly; it's just that people understand space better than time, it's not quite so obvious.

    1. Re:Or this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Um... jumping? Not to mention aircraft and spacecraft. There are loopholes in most "rules".

    2. Re:Or this... by FuzzyBad-Mofo · · Score: 1

      Funny you should mention that. When I was a child, I tried putting a rope under my feet and lifting it with my arms. But for some reason, I was unable to get off the ground.. ;)

  229. Far-future travellers are doomed! by LuxFX · · Score: 1

    Gee, that's great that you've included such detailed coordinates and all. But I hope the far-far-future travellers realize the problem, since apparently none of the MIT folks have taken any earth science classes and didn't take into account tectonic shift!

    It would be a sad day to see a traveller from 150,000 years in the future pop in existance in the middle of an MIT wall because the MIT field the visitor was aiming for was actually 150 feet east of it's present day location.

    --
    Punctanym: alternate spelling of words using punctuation or numerals in place of some or all of its letters; see 'leet'
    1. Re:Far-future travellers are doomed! by Jack+Schitt · · Score: 1

      It's likely that if future travelers have time travel they'll also have a half decent set of fourth-dimensional headlights so they can avoid those random inconveniences such as solid objects existing at the same exact location where they themselves were previously attempting to exist.

      --
      This message brought to you by Jack Schitt's Previously Shat Shit
  230. Back in '82 by WormholeFiend · · Score: 1

    If coach would've put me in fourth quarter... we'd have been state champions, no doubt. No doubt in my mind. You better believe things would have been different. I'd have gone pro...in a heartbeat. I'd be makin' millions of dollars and... livin' in a... big ol' mansion somewhere. You know, soakin' it up in a hot tub with my soul mate.

    I reckon these people know something about time travel... I'll be there.

  231. Re:TT is possible by rabel · · Score: 1

    That's funny, I was thinking just how time travels way too fast. So much to do, so little time to do it. Eh, you'll understand when you get a little older.

  232. It was OK. by uncoolcentral · · Score: 1

    I went to this convention with a few friends. Met a few interesting people there - most, predictably, from the 21st century and beyond. The unexpected highlight for me though, was meeting a couple of pre-20th century travelers. (All claimed to be time-knapping victims - one claimed to have been abducted several times!) Regardless, it was good enough for me to hop to right now to post about it on /. I encourage all to attend. I wore a red an white "where's Waldo?" hat. Say "hi" if you go.

  233. Uh...is this an MIT hack or what? by Alpha_Traveller · · Score: 1
    --
    "Love is like pi - natural, irrational, and very important." (Lisa Hoffman)
  234. Prevent Assassination by Thedalek · · Score: 1

    Think of it this way. You couldn't go back in time and shoot Hilter before he got into power for the very simple reason that it didn't happen. Say you setup a sniper rifle on a building. You could try to fire but you'd either miss, the gun would jam, you'd get arrested, have a heart-attack etc. etc.

    Not necessarily. You could kill him easily enough. It would just turn out that the Hitler we know was an imposter who had easily adopted the identity of Adolf Hitler due to the real Hitler dying mysteriously at the hands of an unknown assailant, and that you just killed an innocent man. (cue Outer Limits theme)

    That, or another time traveller would come along and reverse fate, preventing the assasination. You'd probably have an army of time travellers, fighing both sides: "Hitler must die so that my future is preseved!" "No, Hitler must live so that my future is preserved!"

    --
    Happiness is relative, Based upon the way we live.
  235. silly wabbit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Time travel is for particles.Now if someone could get me the recipes I'd be a happy camper. ;)

  236. Leave it to E.C. by Zentakz · · Score: 1

    Will they have the homebuilt roller coaster or the 3-d teeter totter around for the future arrivals?

  237. Question: by millennial · · Score: 1

    If I say that I'm from five minutes in the future, is it even possible for them to prove me wrong??

    --
    I am scientifically inaccurate.
    1. Re:Question: by EEBaum · · Score: 1

      They could shoot you. With this knowledge, your five-minutes-from-now self may decide against the time jump.

      --
      -- I prefer the term "karma escort."
    2. Re:Question: by Jack+Schitt · · Score: 1

      You end up with a bi-universal parodox in that case:

      Them shooting you would prevent you from travilng back in time (because you chose not to). Because of that, you don't get shot and choose TO travel back in time and get shot. This, again, prevents you from traveling back in time and so forth...

      In every other time line you are shot, with the remaing time lines having you not being shot.

      I think about these things a little too much. The scenario above effectivly cures grandfather syndrome.

      You could even prevent things like what happened in H.G. Wells, Time Machine: to prevent the girl from being killed while forcing the creation of the time machine, he should kidnap the girl moment prior to her being killed and bring her foward in the future by a good four years or so, to the time after he created the time machine. He might even leave plans for the time machine for his earlier self to discover and build the machine from. In other words, to get the girl, he must build the time machine.

      Like I said before, I think about these things a bit too much and it's begining to hurt my social life. God I love Slashdot...

      --
      This message brought to you by Jack Schitt's Previously Shat Shit
    3. Re:Question: by millennial · · Score: 1

      Being shot does not equal being killed. Maybe they just wing me.

      --
      I am scientifically inaccurate.
    4. Re:Question: by Jack+Schitt · · Score: 1

      But it's generally enough incentive to avoid the area.

      --
      This message brought to you by Jack Schitt's Previously Shat Shit
  238. Re:TT is possible by c0bw3b · · Score: 1

    I dunno man, this weekend seems like it went by really fast...

    --
    ||:|::
  239. Re: Freedom of speech is a good thing by L.Bob.Rife · · Score: 1

    The problem is, there are many people who believe they are obviously right and others are obviously wrong. Take extreme liberals and conservatives. They are so convinced that their side is "right", they don't think the other side should say anything at all.

    Now, ignoring what a person has to say is fine, but personally I don't believe in taking away their voice and ability to say crazy things.

    I am glad that both my government and wikipedia believe in Free Speech even if it means I hear some people make absurd claims sometimes. I'd rather hear both sides and be free to make my own choices and decisions. If the idea of free speech worries you, then you worry me.

  240. Primer by IronChef · · Score: 1

    Someone get over there right away, fill the box with argon and switch it on.

  241. Sorry. by pontifier · · Score: 1

    I am not able to attend in the present, therefore there is no reason for me to attend from the future.

    --
    -John Fenley
  242. I went by bxbaser · · Score: 1

    was good lot of people showed up

  243. I'm planning to go back to have shot myself. by aqk · · Score: 1

    If my plan works (or is it 'worked'?), I will travel back to 1936, shoot this guy 'Hitler' (or is it Hilter?), and - if I'm successful, I shall then immediately kill myself, so the gestapo don't torture me. Please let me know if I was succesful.

  244. Re: Freedom of speech is a good thing by glwtta · · Score: 3, Informative
    I'd rather hear both sides and be free to make my own choices and decisions. If the idea of free speech worries you, then you worry me.

    This has nothing to do with free speech (or even Free Speech) whatsoever. Free speech guarantees your right to hold and voice an opinion, unmolested by the powers that be. This concept is often warped into the notion that it obviates the need to defend such an opinion, or that merely holding it requires others to recognize it as valid.

    Nobody is even remotely pondering curtailing the "Titorites"' rights to self expression. What I have a problem with is that the editors of the particular article, in their treatment of the subject matter are giving far too much credence to this particular crackpot theory. They do this in the laudible pursuit of neutrality, but in this case that leads to a product that reflects negatively on the project as a whole.

    Free speech does not mean the abandonment of objective reasoning. Neutral point of view does not mean that wikipedia editors should parrot everything they read on the internet.

    Oh and thank you for providing a link to the article on free speech - how deliciously patronizing.

    --
    sic transit gloria mundi
  245. We have a week to bulk-order coffee mugs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://www.promotemugs.com/

    The screening is fired on, so it's got a chance of lasting a few hundred years. Time travelers should be able to find them at or just about any garage sale.

    I have to assume they'll still have garages - gotta park the floating cars somewhere, right?

  246. The golden rule by Euronymous1 · · Score: 1

    If there ever could be Time Travel, there always would be Time Travel.

  247. A letter to time travelers... by SeaDour · · Score: 1

    When I was younger, I once wrote an ambitious letter to an unknown person of the future, asking them to time travel back to the moment I was writing the letter and visit me, and tell me what the future was like. I had a grand vision of protecting the letter and keeping it in the family for generations to come.

    After signing the letter and waiting a few minutes, the time travelers never showed up. So, with a heavy sigh, I threw the letter in the trash.

    1. Re:A letter to time travelers... by petrus4 · · Score: 1

      >After signing the letter and waiting a few minutes, >the time travelers never showed up. So, with a >heavy sigh, I threw the letter in the trash.

      Hence the problem. Because you threw the letter in the rubbish, anyone from the future of that timeline couldn't have known about its existence and thus could not have travelled back to speak to you...Since rubbish most certainly is not recorded in minute detail, let alone publicised.

      Put such a letter online, publicise it heavily, or (even better) have such a letter be submitted to a major yearbook(s), for instance, and you might have had a bit more luck. ;)

    2. Re:A letter to time travelers... by swv3752 · · Score: 1

      Sorry, got the letter but I was unable to make out the date. Maybe you should take some penmanship classes.

      --
      Just a Tuna in the Sea of Life
    3. Re:A letter to time travelers... by SeaDour · · Score: 1

      Hence the problem. Because you threw the letter in the rubbish, anyone from the future of that timeline couldn't have known about its existence and thus could not have travelled back to speak to you...Since rubbish most certainly is not recorded in minute detail, let alone publicised.

      Yeah, that was...that was my whole point. I was trying to be funny, dude. :P

    4. Re:A letter to time travelers... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Bill and Ted got this one right: If you're planning to do it in the future when you travel to the past, then it will be done already.
      Ted: Dude, how are we gonna get out of this? We don't got any time!
      Bill: Yeah we do, dude. Look, after we get away from this guy, we use the booth. We time travel back to before the concert and set up the things we need to get him now.
      Thus, you were right to throw away the paper.
  248. #3 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "All hands, abandon ship! Repeat! All hands, abandon.. .. **KABLAM** (commercial)

  249. Not true... by raehl · · Score: 2, Informative

    would slam the traveller against the wall at 30km/sec

    The wall slams into the traveller.

    1. Re:Not true... by TeknoHog · · Score: 1

      Either way is true. There is no preferential reference frame; all velocities are relative.

      --
      Escher was the first MC and Giger invented the HR department.
    2. Re:Not true... by raehl · · Score: 1

      I was going for +1 Funny, not +1 Informative.

      Which explains why I was modded +1 Informative.

    3. Re:Not true... by Aumaden · · Score: 1
      The wall slams into the traveller.

      Nah, that only happens in Soviet Russia.

  250. YOU ARE ALL STUPID UNEDUCATED IDIOTS by EEBaum · · Score: 2, Funny

    WARNING:
    Cubic time is proven fact and cannot be disputed. Nature's simultaneous 4-day cube proves that there are four parts to a day, and four days occuring always at the four corners of earth. 2x2=4, and people who insist in time as something that can be traveled think of THREE parts, past present and future, but there are in actuality FOUR parts, fact which is ignored by antiHarmony academia criminals. Time "theories" from people educated moronic in evil institutions are ignorant of the four corners of the time and of the world. Denying the existence of four-sided nature of time and universe is to ensure your own demise. You are stupid arrogant curse to all creatures of the planet.

    /obligatory

    --
    -- I prefer the term "karma escort."
    1. Re:YOU ARE ALL STUPID UNEDUCATED IDIOTS by Sanat · · Score: 1

      Time "theories" from people educated moronic in evil institutions are ignorant of the four corners of the time and of the world

      That would be the intersect of Colorado, Arizona, Utah and New Mexico.

      A definite step back in time.

      --
      And in the end, the love you take is equal to the love you make
    2. Re:YOU ARE ALL STUPID UNEDUCATED IDIOTS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Now come on, apparently the real Time Cube guy is schizophrenic. Not funny.

  251. So.... did they come? by gnobal · · Score: 1

    So... did they come?

  252. Re:Yeah, like the government won't be watching THA by sbaker · · Score: 1

    > If you were really a time traveler, why would you want to show up
    > at a known place on a known date? The government would be waiting
    > with an awesome arsenal of firepower, waiting to forcefully take
    > your tools from you.

    I don't think so...and there is an easy way to see if I'm right.

    Do *you* really think there will be an awesome arsenal of firepower at the
    party next week? Just on the offchance that some time travellers actually
    show up? I kinda doubt it. ...and bear in mind that these guys from the future will know (by reading
    their history books) whether it turned out to be safe or not.

    For us here in the past, the only way to have a hope of catching an
    alert time traveller would be to do it in some way that would be
    completely undetectable in the future - it would have to be very
    carefully hushed up!

    A well publicised event like this one is the safest possible place
    for a time traveller because that's the kind of place where he'll
    have plenty of archival data.

    --
    www.sjbaker.org
  253. Re:TT is possible by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Actually its at the speed of light (thank you einstein!)

  254. Idiots by SpacePunk · · Score: 1

    Their about 2500 years too late.

    1. Re:Idiots by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you think that in the future, people will be able to spell "they're" correctly?

    2. Re:Idiots by SpacePunk · · Score: 1

      No, they'll still have grammar marms then also.

  255. Re:TT is possible by dgatwood · · Score: 1
    Next weekend was pretty cool too.

    See you all at the convention... or rather, I will haven been seeing you at the convention....

    Oh, and if I'm not there, it's because we're in a parallel universe in which I haven't been there yet.

    Maybe it's just me.... :-D

    --

    Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

  256. I'm a Time Traveler! by tavilach · · Score: 1

    After all, I traveled from 11:21 PM PST to 11:22 PM PST as I wrote this reply! It was a real journey, I must say :).

    --

    "Give me a lever long enough and a fulcrum on which to place it, and I shall move the world." -Archimedes
  257. I'll go next year... by MadCow42 · · Score: 1

    slsia.

    (subject line says it all). q:]

    MadCow.

    --
    I used to have a sig, but I set it free and it never came back.
  258. It's tough keeping a location from being lost by Animats · · Score: 1
    Trying to keep a piece of information like that from being lost over time is tough.

    At the 1939 World's Fair, Westinghouse buried a time capsule to be opened in 5000 years. So that it wouldn't be forgotten, thousands of copies of a book, "The Book of Record of The Time Capsule of Cupaloy Deemed Capable of Resisting the Effects of time for Five Thousand Years Preserving an Account of Universal Acheivments Embedded in the Grounds of the New York World's Fair 1939", were printed and distributed worldwide, to libraries, museums, and monastaries - institutions that seemed to have staying power.

    It's hard to find a copy of that book today. Not impossible; hundreds of copies still exist. But it's hard to find.

    1. Re:It's tough keeping a location from being lost by Kris_J · · Score: 1

      Is there an ebook version?

    2. Re:It's tough keeping a location from being lost by bosz · · Score: 1

      Not very hard to find.
      Here you can search for copies of the book www.worldcatlibraries.org. A lot in New York, even in public libraries. The New York Public Library has 2 copies of the book.

    3. Re:It's tough keeping a location from being lost by EvilTwinSkippy · · Score: 1
      Now what will be funny in 100 years when someone develops the area into something new, and the "Time Capsule" ends up in a landfill, only the books about the Time Capsule will remain.

      I guess whoever the George Lucas of the time is will create a holospiel about an archealogist's adventures trying to find the thing.

      --
      "Learning is not compulsory... neither is survival."
      --Dr.W.Edwards Deming
  259. Antiques Sale for Time Travelers Only by ThePeterFiles · · Score: 1

    During the convention I will be holding a special 20th century antiques sale for Time Travelers from the future only.

    Everything must go!

    Fabulously rare items from the 21st and 20th Century available for only a few pounds of gold or diamonds each:

    Get in on the bargains now:

    Rare Teletubby Memorabelia:

    Videos of Worship Services from the exotic Barney and Bob the Builder Cults:

    Rare collectable issues of patterned "Toilet paper" once used in primative hygene appliances of this era.

    Mountains of rare formatted computer media from the mythical computer intelligence that once tried to rule the planet, known to the future only as the pyramidial AOL! Some have been converted into various primative works of art such as coasters, spinning reflectors, and small game hunting spinners.

    These and many other mysterious items can be yours at the one, the only, the original time travelers Antiques sale!

    Come back as many times as you want, once we open, we never close, we stay open as long as the convention does, you can leave and come back that week as many times as you like!

    That's the wonder of Time Travel.

    For more details leave a question at:

    http://thepeterfiles.blogspot.com/2005/04/you-too- can-enter-world-of-internet.html/

    Our Sponsor, The International School of Blog Repair Technicians, Flim Flam Artists, and Blog Repair Technician Groupie Trainees

    Peter, Founder and Chief Groupie Training Evaluator and Testor

  260. Our Only Option by tavilach · · Score: 1

    I like the idea of a Time Traveler's convention, but wouldn't a time traveler be far more likely to travel to a milestone such as the creation or destruction of the Earth?

    I would, of course, love to meet some time travelers. As we can't very well travel to the creation of Earth, we only have one choice. Good thing Bush is the US president :). No, I'm joking about Bush. ...but politics aside, does anyone have a few Nukes?

    --

    "Give me a lever long enough and a fulcrum on which to place it, and I shall move the world." -Archimedes
  261. Fashionably late... by advocate_one · · Score: 1

    Dahlink... I thought you knew... no-one who is anyone turns up on the day... everybody knows you have to be fashionably late to these events... never in the first causality loop... that's for the wannabees...

    --
    Donald 'Duck' Dunn: We had a band powerful enough to turn goat piss into gasoline.
  262. Limitations. by Kaenneth · · Score: 1

    My thought of Time Travel, is that it would only be possible to travel from a sending device to a receiving device; and until the receiver is built; anyone attempting to arrive in a prior time would have their atoms scattered across the universe in a gaussian pattern so thin the best you could achieve is a scent of raw meat at the destination.

    Ditto with Faster-than-light travel; without a reciever placed the old fashioned way you're gone.

  263. I'm sure that's what they'd do by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    After all, if you had the ability to time travel and you wanted to travel back to a certain point in history, of course you would obviously choose a quantum destination as obvious as a glorified Star Trek convention.

    I mean seriously, would anyone take any claims seriously regarding time travel in this way. If anyone were capable of it and managed to travel to this posted destination, would anyone actually believe them? We live in a skeptical society where even if a time traveller arived with proof beyond question of the legitimacy of their time travel, they would in fact be considered a fruit cake who fabricated the entire thing.

    So, now the obvious agrument from the audience is "Yes, but we are believers and if they can in fact prove it, then we'll learn what we can from the traveller and either let him/her be on their way or adopt them into our society etc..."

    Well no offense, but if you're one of the fruit cakes showing up for this event, then you're probably the exact type of person that the time traveller is likely to want to avoid. To best relate to your kind, think of all those Saturday Night Live episodes where either Leonard Nimoy or William Shatner appeared as guests, they seem to always run the same boring skit where a bunch of you weirdos start asking them questions that start with "In Episode XXX, were you...", and shortly afterwards, they jump up and start calling you all geeks and nerds and stuff like that. Well, guess what, the guy from the future probably already knows that story too.

    As for reasons that they would travel backwards in time...

    The guy interested in fixing something that went wrong :
    Would obviously travel to 1 hour before the place and time of conception of George Bush Sr. and convince Former Mr. President Bush's that this neat little rubber thingy is amazing for enhancing the sexual experience and she make her husband wear it, it's called a condom.

    The guy interested in showing off :
    Would travel NASA before the Gemini launch and give them designs to something truly interesting.

    The guy interested in power :
    Would travel to ancient Rome and just take over. Times were far more interesting then than now and you didn't have to worry about a bunch of Jesus-crispies damning you to hell for everything you ever did.

    The guy interested in science :
    Would travel to visit Newton during his younger years when he was a sheperd and sit with him while Newton rambled on about his ideas and maybe have a little fun coaxing him in one direction or another.

    The sci-fi geek of the future
    Would travel back to a frigging sci-fi convention in the 80's before all the original cast were on geritol and wearing false teeth.

    I can go on for ages, but ummm... if there were in fact a time traveller interested in travelling back and making their presence known, don't you think they'd have already done it by now?

  264. MIT Hack? by AndyboyH · · Score: 1

    Sounds like the potential for an MIT hack - we'll know when there's a campus cruiser made to look like a Delorean, and a plywood Blue Police Box...

    --
    Baka Drew
  265. hotel rooms at a decent price by TiggertheMad · · Score: 1

    A few people will show up yesterday anyway just to grab the weekly rate, but they'll probably bop in, hand over their credit card, and not spend much time in the room until next weekend.

    Why would money be an object? Just pop back to the early 1990s, buy a few shares of MS stock, and cash it in when you show up to stay in the presedential suite. It's not like you don't have about a million different ways to make enough money to time tavel in style...

    --

    HA! I just wasted some of your bandwidth with a frivolous sig!
    1. Re:hotel rooms at a decent price by tomhudson · · Score: 1
      Why would money be an object? Just pop back to the early 1990s, buy a few shares of MS stock, and cash it in when you show up to stay in the presedential suite. It's not like you don't have about a million different ways to make enough money to time tavel in style..
      I already tried that, but people kind of look at you funny every time you pop through a time portal stark naked (you want proof - how do you think "streaking" got its start).

      And people are SO weirded out by the whole Terminator thing that they expect *anyone* who pops out through the portal to mug them for their clothes, steal their harley, and start shooting up the town.

      It's easier just to go back to the really simple times and start your own religion.

  266. A few years ago.. by DarrylKegger · · Score: 1

    I was working as a research assistant at the local university physics department and I would often spend my lunch times in the staff room reading crappy articles in the scientific american and chowing down reheated left-overs. Occasionally a group of lectureres would start conversations of a less-pointy headed nature, the sort that are more general in nature and friendlier on the ear-wigging lunch time ear, and in one instance started talking about time travel in this fashion. After a period of sensible discussion one of them claimed in a half-joking manner: "But we do time-travel! We travel through time at the rate of 1 second per .......second...hmmmm". All the lecturers went quiet and looked at each other with strange puzzled expressions, then immediately returned to their sandwichs and newspapers rather than contemplate this conundrum.

  267. Remember When Hanz Gubenstein Invented Time Travel by vdo2000 · · Score: 1
    "Does Anybody Here Remember When Hanz Gubenstein Invented Time Travel?"

    It's a movie script which was in the top 3 submitted to a screenwriting contest (Project Greenlight 3).

    It's quite humorous and a very quick read.

    Ben Affleck's production company has optioned it.

  268. heh by Nexcet · · Score: 0

    someone wants us to do his homework ^_^

  269. Errr... by timlyg · · Score: 0

    May I ask just how "friendly" this convention gonna be?

    Can I bring some of you cavemen with me back to the future if I come?

    Thank you.

  270. In a way, you illustrate the REAL problem by Moraelin · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Everyone acts like a thousand years is the equivalent of "yesterday". The very concept that in thousands of years everyone will even know about one particular nerd party, is at best a joke.

    You know how long a thousand years is? Columbus discovering America is _half_ that time ago.

    A thousand years ago, the Vikings were still getting converted to Christianity. Do you know where the big parties have been at this time? If I told you that Bjarni Hrolfsson and Erik Karlsson (made up viking names) had this fabulous party 1000 years ago, would you even know when and where to go?

    Heck, would you have even heard about it? History tends to recall more like royal events and wars from that long ago. We know roughly when and where the saxon earl Harold Goodwinson fought the Vikings and we know where he later lost to William of Normandie. But do you know exactly where some vikings or normans from back then had a party? I don't think so.

    Roughly a thousand years ago, we had the first crusade. We remember that because it's a bloody big war... went awfully wrong, with a bloody huge PR, but even then a lot of details are missing.

    Roughly a thousand years ago, temperatures peaked _higher_ than they are today. In fact so high that Greenland thawed and was green enough to be called that. The Vikings could farm it.

    That's a bloody huge event even on history scale, but even the vast majority the global-warming scare gang doesn't know about it. (E.g., that it happened without driving SUVs. Or that no, all that molten ice did _not_ kill all fish life, and did _not_ reverse the gulf stream either.)

    Roughly a thousand years ago, Leif Eriksson decided to sail west from Greenland, to check out Bjarni Herjolfsson's story that he's seen land there. And he discovered America. That's a bloody huge event, and even about that we have little more than a saga and some ruins that sorta look like a Viking village. And even that's _one_ of the landfalls that Leif made.

    So what makes anyone think that a nerd party would go into every history book for millenia?

    --
    A polar bear is a cartesian bear after a coordinate transform.
    1. Re:In a way, you illustrate the REAL problem by golgotha007 · · Score: 1

      A thousand years ago, the Vikings were still getting converted to Christianity. Do you know where the big parties have been at this time? If I told you that Bjarni Hrolfsson and Erik Karlsson (made up viking names) had this fabulous party 1000 years ago, would you even know when and where to go?

      What you are forgetting is that in this day and age, more information is being recorded and stored each day than ever before.
      In a hundred years, I would expect for us to at least have some sort of storage media that is unaffected by time.

      Imagine the massive backends and intuitive frontends people will build on all this data. For future time travelers doing research on people's past conceptions of time travel, finding a "Time Traveler Convention" should be fairly easy.

    2. Re:In a way, you illustrate the REAL problem by maxume · · Score: 2, Interesting
      So what makes anyone think that a nerd party would go into every history book for millenia?

      Because we have about as much written history of 1980 now as we did in 1981. The same thing is pretty true for 1970 and 1960 and 1971 and 1961. We are getting better at storing the inane details of daily life. The internet is so new that we don't have a clue as to how long something like slashdot will survive.

      Sure it might eventually die, but when it does, what do you be that the admins of that time have a copy or two of the entire slashdot database(in a format current for that time) on robust storage?

      I always cringe when people talk about backing up digital photos to cdr so that they have a permanent copy. The cdr should be your emergency copy; your permanent copy should be on two harddisks. Wha? Disk storage is currently very easy to migrate. Super worst case, it only takes a day or two to copy the entire thing. That isn't hard to live with. Migrate every five years and you should be all set. ATA survived for what, 15 years? And it isn't exaclty hard to migrate from ATA to SATA. Another bonus is that purchasing hard disks is something most people do anyway. Don't just buy one for more space, buy two and get rid of all your old ones.

      I don't have numbers, but I bet that the average time to transfer the contents of an entire disk probably hasn't gone up that much in the last 20 years, while the capacity has grown in what can only be called ridiculous amounts. 5MB used to be huge. Now 50GB is getting pretty small...

      max

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    3. Re:In a way, you illustrate the REAL problem by swv3752 · · Score: 1

      Bob and Bubba were throwing a truly extravagant party. The ale was freely flowing, lots of great looking viking women, and a "surprising" amount of foreigners there. Spanglish was the most common tongue spoken, but English was a about third. Kinda surprised no drums and guitars were found, but I suspose some of the more conscentious attendees cleaned up well.

      --
      Just a Tuna in the Sea of Life
    4. Re:In a way, you illustrate the REAL problem by CommieOverlord · · Score: 1

      more information is being recorded and stored each day than ever before.

      That's a con, not a pro. There is so much information being generated nowadays that actually finding something particular will be relatively hard. Especially if you aren't actively looking for it.

      What are the odds that somebody 1000 years in the future is going to google to see if there were any cool Time Traveller conventions back in the 20th century.

      Data will get lost. Data that isn't lost will be irrelevant and unused. The rate at which data is being produced is growing exponentially.

    5. Re:In a way, you illustrate the REAL problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Because we have about as much written history of 1980 now as we did in 1981.

      Definitely more, thanks to VH1 :-)

    6. Re:In a way, you illustrate the REAL problem by geekpolitico · · Score: 1

      It all depends on the party. I remember hearing of a party 2,000 years ago. 13 guys attended, it was a bit of a sausage hang save for this whore who showed up for a little bit. Some say she had something going on with the guest of honor, but there are no records to confirm it.

      The party was a total downer because one of the guys got pissed, ratted them out to the cops, and the guest of honor was nailed to two pieces of wood. I heard his Dad had to pick him up a few days later.

    7. Re:In a way, you illustrate the REAL problem by golgotha007 · · Score: 1

      You're not doing any forward thinking. Of course, by using todays methods, being able to organize and effectively use that much data is impossible.

      This "information age" will be at the forefront for at least 100 years. We are just at the beginning of understanding how to store and use large amounts of data effectively.

      By your reasoning, the "rate at which data is being produced is growing exponentially", but wouldn't our ability to handle and use large amounts of data also grow exponentially?

    8. Re:In a way, you illustrate the REAL problem by rjelks · · Score: 1

      I think everyone's off an a tangent here. If time travellers were to show up to the convention...I would imagine it would change the world in a large way. All of the media would write about it. It wouldn't be a minor footnote in history, but a major event. As long as society doesn't collapse, I think they'd remember that date even 1000 years into the future.

      And what if no one shows up? I guess there aren't time travellers....or there's a temporal prime directive. :)

    9. Re:In a way, you illustrate the REAL problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      So what makes anyone think that a nerd party would go into every history book for millenia?

      Easy: it will go down in history as the first event ever where hundreds of time travellers showed up from the future. Surely that's something that attracts a lot of attention.

    10. Re:In a way, you illustrate the REAL problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Now I know why I follow some threads to the end! V. funny, thanks.

  271. This convention failed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Unfortunately, this convention failed due to a lack of from future time travellers back when it occurred on May 7.

    1. Re:This convention failed by bosz · · Score: 1

      I made an appointment in my agenda to travel back to may 7 2005, but the problem is that my agenda in my Palm doesn't go any further than december 31 2031. So I hope that time travel is invented by then.

  272. Sweet! by periol · · Score: 1

    I'll be looking for a hot brunette to help me with Cheeseman's Theory of Emotional Energy.

    (wait, before you mod me off-topic, watch the movie this comes from: Happy Accidents, the best romantic comedy sci-fi in the history of the universe.)

  273. doesn't work by Bisqwit · · Score: 1

    But won't the problem be that when nobody participates, the history will record that nobody participated and thus nobody will ever travel back to the event in fear of changing the history?

    1. Re:doesn't work by Bisqwit · · Score: 1

      Like I said...

  274. Hmm... would it already be full? by Vthornheart · · Score: 1
    Okay, so let's see if we can figure this out...


    Suppose that it *is* advertised enough that people in the future would know about it and travel back. Would that mean that we'd see the time travelers in the time that *we* pass through it (as in, the first time we see the event)?


    Because if we make it publicized now, then in the future when people travel back to the event, they will be traveling to this coming event.


    So we'll know if it was successful immediately, because a time traveler (or many) will show up. How's that for instant gratification?

    --
    -Vendal Thornheart
  275. Re:Disruption? Moot point. by drsquare · · Score: 1

    I believe in the opposite theory, where there is only one possible instance of history. With the way all the molecules etc. are set up, ther's only one thing they can do, follow the current course they're taking and interact accordingly. Everything that can happen has already been pre-determined, and there's nothing that can change.

    For example, if two molecules in space are on a direct collision course, there's no possible instance of history where they miss.

  276. Cat and Girl by plexxer · · Score: 1

    Check out the bumper stickers here:

    http://catandgirl.com/store.php

    Gotta love Cat and Girl.

    --
    The government's moral compass is controlled by GPS.
    In times of crises, they alter it to suit their needs.
  277. Time, Only Time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    'Time Travel' be it forwards or backwards is impossible. Time is continuous. The past has been used and cannot be reused. The future will be reached but only at present course.

    - Alpha & Omega

  278. Re:Researchers checked for this kind of thing befo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You're assuming they don't kill the people who were going to attend the events and take their place.

  279. Re:Yeah, like the government won't be watching THA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "If you were really a time traveler, why would you want to show up at a known place on a known date? The government would be waiting with an awesome arsenal of firepower, waiting to forcefully take your tools from you."

    So read the newspapers one week later, and check there aren't any reports of a firefight, before attending.

  280. Re:TT is possible by willgott · · Score: 1

    Parent has been moderated as "Funny", but he is in fact correct: Time dilation

  281. Re:Yeah, like the government won't be watching THA by SamSim · · Score: 1

    Do you think it's likely the government will take this seriously and place agents there? It's just an MIT party! Sure, they'll find out afterwards that there were time travellers at the party, but the government doesn't HAVE time travel so it'd be too late to do anything about it.

  282. The Eternal Question... by geoffrobinson · · Score: 1

    Terminator vs. Back to the Future

    --
    Except for ending slavery, the Nazis, communism, & securing American independence, war has never solved anything.
  283. Uhhh by Craig_P92669 · · Score: 0

    Yeah you can. A new universe would come into being the moment you shot Hitler.

    --
    http://xs4.xs.to/pics/04481/p556222.gif
  284. I've been to the past, and it's nothing special by Ziggurat+Dan · · Score: 1
    In 1998, I went back to the period 1985-1988, when I attended my 10-year high school reunion. For those envisioning being able to stop Hitler or curing Polio or investing in eBay in your travels to the past, you'll be sorely disappointed. The past is filled with reminders of why you eventually cut your hair, cheerleaders who had their most productive and useful time on the earth during those brief years of high school, and pictures of you wearing a Frankie Goes to Hollywood "Relax" t-shirt. Really, skip traveling into the past (which then lets you altogether avoid any space-time paradox issues that may arise) and instead go have a nice dinner at the nearest Chili's.

    My time travel DID alter the future, though. I had planned on attending each and every one of these reunion functions for my lifetime, but my trip changed that opinion entirely...

    --
    I'm pro-accordion and I vote
  285. Greeting from the future ! by Jackal82277 · · Score: 1

    I have traveled back in time to force myself not to read this post, in the hope to have this 10 minutes of my life back. Note to self : No not read this

  286. It's actually greek... by Ron+Harwood · · Score: 2, Informative

    Jesus is greek for Joshua... apparently Jesus's actual name... go fig - as the catholic church originally used greek as their official language until Pope Victor I changed it to latin (his native language).

    BTW, if you want good alternate history regarding Jesus - I highly recommend Chrisopher Moore's "Lamb: The Gospel According to Biff, Christ's Childhood Pal".

  287. Re:Yeah, like the government won't be watching THA by gr8dude · · Score: 1

    Perhaps future-folk will NOT show up at the party because they _know_ they would be captured by the feds.

  288. language by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    of course any timetraveller will not understand english language at all..

  289. Stuck by Preferred+Customer · · Score: 1


    I don't know the future now. If I traveled to the past, would I know the future then? If not, how would I know where I came from? Would I end up thinking I was always there? Who can say there aren't many unaware travelers among us?

  290. Yeah Sure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Like if anyone could go back in time and risk changing their future reality, they'd pick this conference to go back to? Come on, if I was going to go back, I'd either go to quietly witness some event or person (Like Jesus Christ), or really try to fix something (like prevent Hitler from getting into power.) It sure would be to go to some convention of nerds.

  291. Impossible? by crasher381 · · Score: 1

    If no one from the future shows up does that mean that time travel will always be impossible?

  292. Are you sure? by benhocking · · Score: 1
    but the government doesn't HAVE time travel so it'd be too late to do anything about it.

    Sure, that's what they'll want you to have thunk.

    --
    Ben Hocking
    Need a professional organizer?
  293. Idiots. by northcat · · Score: 1

    Time travelling is a logical impossibility. It's science fiction. I can't believe that some people, at *MIT*, are taking this seriously.

    1. Re:Idiots. by SuiteSisterMary · · Score: 1
      Time travelling is a logical impossibility. It's science fiction.

      Einstein and General Relativity disagree with you.

      --
      Vintage computer games and RPG books available. Email me if you're interested.
  294. jbanes@gmail.com by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you lick it you can fuck it. Give me a call, anytime.

    jbanes@techie.com
    608-524-2574

    Jerason Banes
    2701 E Main St. Lot 120
    Reedsburg,WI,US 53959

  295. Busy Schedule by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I figured I'd be too busy this month to attend so I went last March. It was and will be fun.

  296. In a thousand years by nurb432 · · Score: 1

    Our entire civilization will have collapsed and I don't see anything that future archeologists unearthing being readable due to our current 'throwaway society'.

    At least in the past we used rocks to write on.. Even they don't last forever...

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
  297. They should have spamvertized by just+fiddling+around · · Score: 1

    Like this guy ! Man was that spam refreshing...

    --
    You're not old until regret takes the place of your dreams.
  298. It's simple logic. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What's happened has happened.
    it is.

    binary. it's as simple as that.
    0101 -+-+

  299. It would've been a cool party... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If it weren't for the time embargo act of 2293-2358, the longest lasting ban on time travel. It basically forbade time travel outside of that time period. Man... they had the coolest time travelers, and arguably the best drugs of all history.

    1. Re:It would've been a cool party... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If it weren't for the time embargo act of 2293-2358, the longest lasting ban on time travel. It basically forbade time travel outside of that time period. Man... they had the coolest time travelers, and arguably the best drugs of all history.

      You must've failed history, man, so let me refresh you. Time travel wan't just illegal under the act, it was a galactic class felony, punishable by on-site execution. There were literally T-Cops everywhere along the chronostreams. Corruption was bad, though. T-Cops would sometimes jump to a random point in time and execute innocent people, simply because they could. Eventually, the T-Cop corruption got so bad that the act was repealed, and the T-Cops were disbanded. Good riddance, I certainly wouldn't want one of those guys killing my ancestors.

      And I wouldn't consider the muties from that period to be cool, at all. I don't know why anyone would want to do what they did to their genome.

  300. No, au contraire by Moraelin · · Score: 2, Interesting

    "What you are forgetting is that in this day and age, more information is being recorded and stored each day than ever before.
    In a hundred years, I would expect for us to at least have some sort of storage media that is unaffected by time.
    "

    Point well taken, but the summary said _thousands_ of years. In which case, sorry, nope.

    Don't forget that a lot of information before had been engraved on metal, carved on wood (which is why runes look the way they look: they were designed for carving into wood), or inscribed on clay tablets and baked. And it still got lost.

    Do you think someone's backups on CD will be more durable than that?

    Also while we do record more data, also more data is lost every day.

    A clay tablet is still readable in a hundred years if you still know the alphabet. Whereas nowadays can you tell me where can I buy an 8" disk drive for my PC, to read my old CP/M diskettes? Is there even a filesystem driver for any OS that can still read CP/M disks?

    And after less than 2000 years time we needed a Rosetta Stone and some big pictograms to re-discover how to read the ancient Egyptian pictograms. Now think that we had just found a shiny plastic disk. Even if we figured out how to read it, you're left with a string of numbers that say _nothing_ about the actual text. Which combination of bits is Anubis-looking-left?

    So I wouldn't expect that much data to survive us.

    Plus there's a lot to be said about noise-to-signal ratio. Even if all the information did survive, after 1000 years we'd have a mountain of blogs, Counter-Strike clan pages, flamewars, etc. Trying to even search for anything through this data is like looking for the proverbial needle, only this time in a whole mountain of hay.

    Do you really think anyone will look through that data for a nerd party? Or they'll be more interested in our wars?

    --
    A polar bear is a cartesian bear after a coordinate transform.
    1. Re:No, au contraire by RealAlaskan · · Score: 1
      And after less than 2000 years time we needed a Rosetta Stone and some big pictograms to re-discover how to read the ancient Egyptian pictograms. Now think that we had just found a shiny plastic disk. Even if we figured out how to read it, you're left with a string of numbers that say _nothing_ about the actual text.

      Already covered, for thousands of years to come. The new, improved Rosetta Stone. A really nifty project. I want one.

  301. It Was Boring by cowgoesmoo2004 · · Score: 2, Funny
    They only did it for a few years, then it fell out of disfavor.

    I do have a nifty t-shirt from 2007 though.

  302. I'm having dog tags made to advertise it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hopefully, some of the ten stainless steel dog tags will survive well into the future. I'll try to disperse them geographically.

  303. Ouroboros (red dwarf spoiler) by Destoo · · Score: 1

    "Worm or serpent with its tail in its mouth, symbolizing completion, perfection and totality, the endless round of existence."

    .
    .

    Just like being your own father, or mother, or both.
    (because Lister sleept with his female counterpart from a parallel universe, and being in that reverse universe, he was the one getting pregnant and had the baby, came back in time, put in in a box labeled "ouroboros" which he left under a pool table in the Aigbuth Arms pub. Perfection.)

    --
    Nouvelles de jeux et technologies en français. TC
  304. Re:Yeah, like the government won't be watching THA by cowgoesmoo2004 · · Score: 2, Funny
    Interestingly, what if a time traveller was actually there. How would they be able to prove it to you.

    To go through all the effort of risking life and limb to show up at such a lame event, avoiding the government agents, and nobody believes you are from the future anyway.

    That's why I'm not going anyway. There's a much better convention held every year on the dark side of the moon anyway. We get quite a chuckle out of you losers on earth not being able to figure it out!

  305. Re:Yeah, like the government won't be watching THA by Beinoni · · Score: 1

    Dude, if the Government showed up with an array of awesome firepower, that alone would make it worth it for present people to attend the party.

  306. And who is Titor? by Snaller · · Score: 1

    That's who.

    --
    If Google really cared they would fix Android Chrome to reflow text, instead of discriminating
  307. At the convention by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hey all, the convention was an absolute blast! Best time I'ver ever had.

  308. SpaceTime as a State Engine by Orne · · Score: 1

    I've been thinking along these lines lately, wondering if we all have it wrong because of how we observe the passing of time. We think that because we "remember" a previous event, we sequence our events, declare that time is a line and thus reversable. Yet, aren't memories just chemical reactions? We want to remember something, our neurons are firing in realtime to rebuild the picture of the event, we recall the event in realtime, and compare the two perceptions in realtime.

    Imagine the universe is a giant state machine. It isn't that hard to picture, since we have lots of things in nature that have discrete states (electron levels, quantum objects, etc). Each "tick" of the machine is one plank interval of time, where we resolve things like momentum, accellerations, etc to create a new state based on the previous position of variables.

    We still have things like "cause and effects", because effects are just the unwinding of the state engine based on the configuration a number of temporal ticks beforehand. We still have free will, because the "future" is literally unwritten... everything is a direct consequence of our actions in realtime.

    How does one travel in time in an engine like this? Well, to "travel" you have to recreate the quatum states (positions, energy level, etc), and immerse yourself in the construct. There would be discontinuities in the state engine, and the only way to set that up is to exist outside of the processing to reconfigure the code... something we will not have the ability to do (for a long time, if ever).

    The last thing that bugs me about conventional (ha!) time travel is the whole deal of conservation of energy. Futhermore, Energy with a duration (time) is Power. In order for you to move between timelines, are you not moving the mass and energy (that make up "you") into a closed system? In the traditional time travel model, you want to jump out of the "present", move to the past for a long duration, and jump back to shortly after "present". If spacetime is dimensional, then shouldn't the power (energy over time) spent in the past be equal to an amount of power extracted from the future? If the net energy of the universe from just before your jump ino the past is equal to just after you return to the present, is energy still conserved by definition? Maybe someone else would want to add their comments.

  309. I just got back from convention. It'll be great. by srobert · · Score: 1

    It was so good to finally meet H.G. Wells there.

  310. Why all this Hitler talk? by tomzyk · · Score: 1

    I don't get it. I've read a lot of these posts and a bunch of them keep talking about going back in time and killing Hitler.

    Why always him and not someone else? Did he show up to this Time Travelers' Convention and annoy a lot of people or something? If so, it's your own fault for inviting all time travellers and you should have seen this coming by simply reading a newspaper from May 8, 2005.

    --
    Karma: NaN
  311. Great! by vmfedor · · Score: 1

    I'm just happy that we'll finally know where Carmen Sandiego is.

    --

    I like my women how I like my sugar.. granulated.

  312. In case you didn't know, we're all time travelers by panchondo · · Score: 0

    We're just limited to going foward in time. Being alive is the same as traveling through time.

  313. collision risk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We could all be killed. With every time traveller ever pointing their machine at the same space-time coordinates they'll all crash into eachother. Who knows what kind of fuel they use and what the consequences of a leak will be.

  314. Time Travellers Hate us by Adelbert · · Score: 2, Informative

    Let's assume for one moment that time travel is possible, and that's its discovered by people at some indeterminate point in the future (or past... ). Obviously time travellers don't interact with us. I haven't seen Hitler be assassinated recently... So either time travellers have some code of ethics that prevents them from changing history, or the Government heavily regulates time travel, or for some other reason interaction is impossible. Whatever, no-one will turn up to this party. Sounds like a lot of parties at MIT.

  315. Basically, I agree with you. But, ... by amiable1 · · Score: 1

    For a slightly different take on what to look for see http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=148007&cid=124 03702
    Like any other experiment, one is exploring a parameter space, some experiments explore more of the parameter space than others, different experiments different parts. Your objections say that there are significant portions of the parameter space missing from the "fiduciary 4-volume" of the proposed experiment. My comments said the same. Still, its an experiment, and might as well be done as well as possible.

  316. I know this is impossible.... by notherenow · · Score: 0

    ....because if it ever were possible, I'd come back and fix one little thing that I did wrong a few years ago. Or was that what I did?

    --
    We all dance, we all sing.
    -The Streets
  317. I can see it already. by i41Overlord · · Score: 1

    I can picture myself playing a prank on these guys, showing up to the event in a homemade silver jumpsuit from the "future", only to be met by every other geek there with the same idea.

    I'll bring a copy of Duke Nukem Forever as evidence and play it on a laptop with an Elbrus 6000 processor and a BitBoys Oy GPU.

  318. Re:Yeah, like the government won't be watching THA by swv3752 · · Score: 1

    Maybe several hundred Indians to say one Abrahms tank. Given the choice between Indian and tank crew, I'd choose crew, and still would prefer option c: not there at all.

    --
    Just a Tuna in the Sea of Life
  319. Feynman diagrams and time reversal by mothas · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Years ago when I took physics, we had a lecture or two on an interpretation of anti-particles as time-reversed particles, and annihilation reactions and pair-production reactions as time reversals. (For those interested in the real physics, do a google search on the title of this post). Anyway, it was good for a couple of BS over beer discussions. It did appear to allow time travel, but it didn't let you leave the time line to do it. While traveling back in time, you interact with the universe as if you're made of antimatter, which pretty much meant any time machine had to be a spacecraft. The energy requirements were enormously huge ( greater than twice your rest mass at both ends of the trip). There is a real problem avoiding hitting yourself on the way back (which would be bad), but it looked like it actually did permit the travel.

    1. Re:Feynman diagrams and time reversal by Bryan+Ischo · · Score: 1

      If you follow a line of reasoning based on assumptions and a fundamental lack of knowledge (not just that you have, that humanity has about the laws of physics), and you arrive at an illogical conclusion (time travel), I think you ought to realize that your reasoning and asumptions are flawed, rather than believe that your conlusions are correct.

      Time travel is simply not possible; forget physics. It is a logical absurdity to say that I could create a paradox by "going back" to the past and killing myself.

      As a hint for the future, if you take a physics course and your extrapolations from what you've learned lead you to believe that you can make 2 plus 2 equal 4, then you probably should stop right there and study your books a little harder rather than announcing that you've found out how to make the impossible, possible.

      Sorry - not to sound overly critical - but "time travel" has been one of my pet peeves for quite some time. It's worse than a religion because even people who otherwise tend to think pretty rationally get caught up in the fantasy of believing in time travel.

    2. Re:Feynman diagrams and time reversal by mothas · · Score: 1

      Don't you know you should never pet a peeve? I share your frustration with the number of folks who fail to recognize fantasy for what it is, but don't forget to keep an open mind and examine the assumptions you make yourself. A fundamental problem (ok, one of them) with 'time travel' is the fact that the whole concept is ill posed as it is usually discussed.

      For example, consider a moving particle. At one time, you see it at point A, then later it's at point B. Now, how do you know if the particle is moving in the same direction through time as yourself? It could be going *forward* in time from point A to B, or *backwards* in time from B to A, and your observations would be identical. The physical properties would differ, yes, but we didn't say what particle it was, so that doesn't matter to the discussion. Now suppose that of the myriads of particles that make up yourself, some are moving forwards while others are going backwards. It makes absolutely no difference to you, because the whole ensemble is moving exactly as you expect. All this turns out to be independent of your own perception of time, which I presume is driven by entropy (I'm a physicist, not a biochemist, but that is my understanding). Entropy keeps on going in the same direction, regardless of the temporal direction of the particles it is being calculated on, since it depends on their trajectories rather than their temporal movement.

      So, now lets say we want to reverse your direction in time. There are some particle interactions that could potentially do it for you, so we don't need any new physics. The problem is that while you might time-reverse the particles that make up your body, that doesn't reverse your *perception* of time; your body may indeed go back in time (and may already be doing so), but *you* won't.

      You get the idea. I agree with you that you can't create paradoxes, but saying that time travel is simply not possible really doesn't reflect well on your own depth of understanding.

      p.s. 2+2 *does* equal 4.

  320. If you went back and built a Hitler... by elrous0 · · Score: 1
    ...would you shoot a time machine?

    -Eric

    --
    SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
  321. I am very curious ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    to know how many time travellers did show up at the party ?

    Were there any alien time travellers ?

    Well, maybe they did show up but the government is suppressing the facts and Scully and Moulder should go after them !

    Or it was too early for them to reveal us the truth, but they will probably shown up at the next convention. Soooooooo, here is my announcement to all time travellers, please, I call a convention for time travellers with a well-done bbq steaks and fresh beer at my backyard, May 1, 2005 at Austin, TX !

    You can bring friends and relatives too!

    See ya little green fellas.

  322. Avoid time travelers like the plague. by BasilBibi · · Score: 0

    Anyone time travelling backward would pass on lethal viral strains to all they came into contact with.

  323. Hold your horses... by oliverk · · Score: 1

    Okay, so the page states that they need our help getting the word out. But there's no rush -- hell, we've got lifetimes to get the word out and it'll still be as effective as ever! But we need something really big. Maybe if we carve the coordinates and timestamp into a hillside in South America so that it can be read from space, then maybe it'll work? It's got to be big and lasting otherwise all of our efforts will have as much impact as Taco Bell's big giveaway a few years back.

    --
    ---- Please be nice in case my Slashdot karma ~= my real life karma.
  324. Titor by juicyfruit · · Score: 0

    Very bizarre, that the future found it easier to build a time machine than to port time_t to 64 bits.

    Maybe all the bits get used up in the intervening time, and are therefore scarce in 2036. That would also explain the need for an old bit-conserving IBM 5100.

  325. Re:And edit like? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You can blame that on Bush and his Texas Rancher buddies. Even after news footage leaked about several mad cows found in Texan herds, they still deny it's mad cow disease. No way to prove it one way or the other, as the USDA conveniently discarded the neural tissue without testing, and refused to test the live animals being reported on. The claim by USDA inspectors was that it WAS NOT mad cow disease, and thus did not warrant expensive testing. This dispite the fact that the quarantined cattle in the footage had trouble standing and was frothing -- sounds like MC disease to me.

  326. Skip it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Trust me. I went and it sucked. It sucked so bad that I went back in time to stop myself from going in the first place.

  327. Time Travel Convention Moved by surelyserious · · Score: 1

    Spider Robinson, author of Callahan's Crosstime Saloon, was contacted today about the Time Traveler's conference, and is instead attending the re-scheduled conference in Key West, FL, on September 10th, 2001 due to preferential US "climate."

    --
    "We're millions of miles from earth, inside a giant white face, what's impossible?"
  328. "Primer" independent film by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm really surprised that nobody has mentioned http://www.primermovie.com/ Primer yet.

  329. Singularity City by berenddeboer · · Score: 1

    If people are interested in a fun SF book in which time travel is possible (Einstein, if you go faster than light this implies time travel is possible), and the reason why despite being this possible there is no actual time travel, read Singularity Sky by Charless Stross.

    --
    If I had a sig, I would put it here.
  330. Re: fantasy of believing in time travel. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You're close on that point. Actually, there's no belief to it. People just enjoy constructing fantasies that involve the impossible because well ... they're impossible. Fantasy is just a vehicle for imagining things we cannot do. There's no real point fantasizing about doing something when you could do it for real (without adverse consequences).

  331. Re:Yeah, like the government won't be watching THA by gatkinso · · Score: 1

    Now compare several thousand Royal Marines appearing dressed as Cherokees while the Cherokees were making their plans......

    --
    I am very small, utmostly microscopic.
  332. Re:Yeah, like the government won't be watching THA by gatkinso · · Score: 1

    True, but in this case the Royal Marine has camaflage, body armor, grenades, night vision, GPS, and about two hundred rounds of armor piercing ammo fired from a rifle with hundreds or yards of effective range. Not to mention foreknowledge of the attack and superior training and tactics.

    --
    I am very small, utmostly microscopic.
  333. message to time travellers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Attention chrononauts!

    Pick me up and take me to this. Bring some of your future beer.

  334. No Wiki? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's not in Wikipedia. I don't think it happened.

  335. there's a logic problem here by noamsml · · Score: 1

    assuming that time travel is possible and may exist in the future, and assuming that atime traveller comes to the covention and explains how to buld such a machine. wouldn't that mean that time travelexisted because it exited, and that it was never invented?

  336. Re: Freedom of speech is a good thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Actually, Mr. Smart Guy, If the editors of wikipedia DIDN'T parrot everything they read on the internet wikipedia would be an editorial instead of an encyclopedia.

    You are right on one point though, it has nothing to do with free speech. As for the guy with the underpants gnomes in his attic, if there were more then just your account of these creatures, and a group of people did infact believe you, yes you should be put in the wikipedia. Even if it is a dillusion many people share, the fact that a group of people share it deserves its place in a free encyclopedia.

  337. Collisions? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If too many time travelers head for the same point in space-time, isn't the probability of collisions rather high?

    This happened in a Far Side, as I remember; the caption was something like, "Tempers flare when Professors A and B set their time machines to the same coordinates", and there are two angry men yelling at each other from beside wrecked time machines, with dinosaurs in the background.

  338. The answer is: by dexter+riley · · Score: 1

    The egg came first.

    Story one: Once, millions of years ago, there was a creature that was almost-not-quite-a-chicken. It bred with another almost-not-quite-a-chicken, and through genetic recombination, produced an egg, a chicken egg, that would hatch to produce the first chicken. Before that egg, there were no true chickens, so the egg came first.

    Story two: Once, hundreds of millions of years ago, there was an insect/fish/reptile that laid an egg. There were no chickens around, so again, the egg came first.

  339. Lacks conviction.... by jemenake · · Score: 1

    Unfortunately, they open themselves up to impostors. How will they know which, of those in attendance, are really time-travelers?

    The real way to tell is to reserve the meeting space... and then, only advertize it after the event has passed. That way, anybody who actually showed up (other than the organizers), are highly suspect as real time-travelers.

    However, the fact that they didn't do this, I think, shows the lack of conviction that these organizers have that any real time-travelers will show.

  340. Re: Freedom of speech is a good thing by glwtta · · Score: 1
    Actually, Mr. Smart Guy, If the editors of wikipedia DIDN'T parrot everything they read on the internet wikipedia would be an editorial instead of an encyclopedia.

    We already have something that contains everything on the internet: the internet.

    As for the guy with the underpants gnomes in his attic, if there were more then just your account of these creatures, and a group of people did infact believe you, yes you should be put in the wikipedia.

    That's just it (I am that guy, btw), there isn't more than just an online account under a pseudonim to that story. As for people believing, well, that has never been much of a supporting argument; there's plenty of people who believe all sorts of stupid crap, it is certainly their right and some of them are probably right, the mere fact of believing is just not much of an argument one way or another.

    Don't get me wrong though, I absolutely agree that this deserves a place in the encyclopedia. My problem with the article is that it grossly overstates the validity of these claims and is hugely biased. In fact wikipedia itself provides guidelines on why the type of language it uses is bad practice.

    --
    sic transit gloria mundi
  341. There's no future in time travel... by tiktokman · · Score: 1

    The truth is, time travel is impossible. How do I know? Easy. And this simple truth is overlooked by many scientists etc. here goes:

    We would already know if time travel will be possible in the future because time travellers from the future WOULD ALREADY BE HERE VISITING US! IT WOULD BE THE TRAVEL FAD OF THE FUTURE - AND OF COURSE THEY'D INTERACT WITH US AND FUCK UP HISTORY.but it's never happened. Because it's impossible.

    Even if you subscribe to the "multiverse" theory that there are an infinite number of parallel universes, so if you go back and kill your father etc. when you return to your "time" you actually return to a new universe created by your actions, it still doesn't make any sense, because in the "real" universe, the one you left, nothing changed, so in that universe there was not time travel... Fuck my brain hurts.