Slashdot is Giving Away $100,000
So to kick off the new year, Andover.Net decided that we ought to give away a lot of money. We're excited to announce the 2000 Slashdot Beanie Awards. No, we're not giving away 2000 beanies, but we are giving away prizes ranging from $30k for Most Improved Open Source Project to $10k awards for things like Unsung Hero and Best Community Advocate. You can read the
awards index, where you can also discuss the categories as well as place your nominations. Or you can read on to see a list of awards and a description of the nomination and voting process.
Nomination
Let's be honest here. If Hemos and I sat down in a room and tried to pick the nominees for each catagory ourselves, either we would have the five members of Monty Python nominated for every category or only one of us would emerge from the room alive. And then whoever lived would get flamemail because we forgot to include Carol Cleveland (who really deserved to be nominated for Best Unix Eyecandy).
We didn't want to deal with that. So instead we've opened up the nominations. Each registered Slashdot user is allowed to nominate one person or project in each category. Each category will have a Slashdot discussion attached to it where you can chit chat about the nominees. And everyone can change their vote as many times as they want (until the nominations close in 2 weeks).
The nominations are blind... you can't see who is winning until...
Voting Voting will function the same way. You can talk amongst yourselves, and each registered user is allowed one vote which can be changed all you want until we close the contest. The winners will be announced at the next LinuxWorld in New York. The Categories The Grand Prize ($30,000)- Most Improved Open Source Project
- Most Improved Kernel Module
- Unsung Hero
- Best Newbie Helper
- Most Deserving Open Source Charity
- Best Open Source Advocate
- Best Unix Desktop Eyecandy
- Best Unix Desktop Earcandy
- Best Desktop Theme
- Best Open Source-Related Book
- Best Perl Module
- Best Apache Module
- Best Open Source Text Editor
- Best Deserving of a $2,000 Award
- Best Designed Interface in a Graphical Application
- Best Designed Interface in a Non-Graphical Application
- Best Dressed
- Favorite Slashdot Comment Poster
- Favorite Slashdot Author
- Best Slashdot Story of 1999
- Big Dumb Patent Bully
- Big Dumb Domain Bully
- Clue Stick Award for FUD in Journalism
- The Hemos Award (only Hemos is eligible)
Seems to me that a large portion of the Open Source stuff out there is just rewriting things that've already been invented. The people who are inventing new things don't get the attention they deserve.
Why not give an award for new ideas? If Open Source wants to survive, it needs to innov... inn... innova... invent new things. (Sorry, couldn't bring myself to say it... the term has been tarnished forever...)
maybe I just got to work too early, but the first thing that popped to mind when I read that title was that slashdot was giving away $100k worth of Beanie Babies.
:)
I'm glad to see I was wrong.
I've nominated Mike Heins as a unsung hero in open source software. His package, Minivend (www.minivend.com), is important to e-commerce behind the scenes and rivals the most expensive propietary systems. He works very hard on this software and releases it all under the GPL.
It also drives the many passionate fans of Open Source to keep promoting the virtues of Open Source.
Without the Evil Empire, the whole Open Source movement would be without a focal point and without direction!
All hail Microsoft for creating the environment where a whole new culture could develop and thrive!!
how bout contributing $100K to freshmeat so they can mirror all the opensource projects on their site ? That way, if a website shuts down we dont loose that project forever...and its a helluva lot better than giving it away for nothing.
"Person most deserving $2000" What kind of award is that? Better to call it best ballot stuffer. Unsung hero? If no one knows about someone's work, who is going to know to vote for them?
I always hated school sponsored popularity contests, where all the jocks and cheerleaders get to give themselves awards and see who had the most friends. Is this really all that different? Doing stuff like this creates resent among all those who feel left out. Especially since most open source work is a group effort, to single one person out is a slap in the face to all those whose work is ignored.
I suppose none of this matters, since we already know who will get all these awards, Linus Torvalds, Alan Cox, Larry Wall, Apache, XFree86, etc.
Being some of the only Linux groups that get favorable postings on Slashdot, I'm sure members of the three groups in the subject will be pleased. And I'm sure the rest of us can go pound sand.
I, for one, will not be voting for this very reason. Slashdot occasionally presents an even handed view of the Linux landscape, but the congretation here is so biased I find it odd that Andover.net would authorize something like this contest to take place. It's like opening up a vote on whether gun control is a good idea knowing that only NRA members have received word of the contest. This contest is guaranteed to be skewed.
Don't even get me started on all the perl hackers out there who -- as we speak -- are customizing their scripts to help skew the results.
If Andover was serious about this contest, it would set up another web site (rumor has it that it's an Internet company, after all), leave the Slashdot moniker off of it, then let ALL Linux news sites carry word of its existence and let the community in general vote. Without that, I can't take this contest seriously.
Flame away...
We are very aware there are some very good coders out there...
What we need to do with awards like this is support the folks who write howtos and help pages and even books about Linux and open source.
Some of us, ( I am thinking of me ) used to be great C and ASM coders back about 15 years ago and now ( at least me ) is far to tired to keep up with you young smart dudes. However i want to and am going to write a few articles and perhaps a newbie book about Linux.
I recognize your skills.. i used to have them but they are gone. But I am sure I can write...
In your awards consider those folks too.
Bitcoin pyramid: Join here: http://www.bitcoinpyramid.com/r/1427 it's FREE!
Seriously, I agree with the other posts. What happened to Slashdot the news organization? I'm getting sick of Slashdot the open source advocate.
Not that I'm against open source, but you guys have gone way off course. Suck.com's parody was right on target when one of the headlines read "Linux possibly defamed somewhere"
"News for Nerds. Stuff that matters." Not anymore.
- overflow
What's the point of retroactively awarding people? Why not use the money as an incentive to coders, like a contest?
Especially since there are glaring problems in the categories. The first issue is the ones where I can already pick the final winner.
Big Dumb Patent Bully == Amazon
Big Dumb Domain Bully == etoys
Clue Stick Award for FUD in Journalism = MSNBC
Is there any point to these, when all they'll do is attract flamebait?
Then there's the ones where 90% of the voters will go "Huh??". Like:
Best Perl Module
Most Improved Kernel Module
Best Newbie Helper
Does the standard Slashdot reader have any clue on these? Personally, I can't even suggest a single nomination off the top of my head.
So wouldn't this money be better served by using it for a CONTEST? That $30,000 for "Most Improved Open Source Project" is one hell of an incentive for the lone coder to get off their ass and start developing. Instead we'll probably just award some crappy half assed Microsoft UI imitator that has a lot of name recognition. *cough* KDE *cough* Go Slashdot!
I didn't nominate too many categories, but the following rationale applies three of those I did:
...
Most Improved OS Project: Livid (the Linux DVD Project) - Not only has playing DVDs under Linux gone from a pipe-dream to reality (if still a little rough around the edges) in a very short time, but with the help of DeCSS/css-auth it could be ready for prime time in the very near future. Additonally, the project is very important for the consumer/desktop usability of Linux, and could use the $10k cash to fend off additional legal thuggary from the DVD Forum.
Best UNIX desktop earcandy: xmms - the audio app I use more often than my television or stereo. (Though Myth2 Soul Blighter was a temptation)
Clue Stick Award for FUD in Journalism: Declan McCullagh of Wired -- not only did this person's poor reporting precipitate serious legal troubles for developers of css-auth (the Linux DVD css component), but he remained unapologetic throughout and, even worse, followed up with even more damaging FUD after having been informed of the errors in his reporting. His behavior on the livid development mailing list was unprofessional and reprehensibe, where he even went so far as to flame Livid developers without provocation. I only wish the archives were still up to link to here
The Future of Human Evolution: Autonomy
Not only was I shocked to see Andover buy Slashdot from the geeks, but I am even more shocked to see the amount of money they're putting into it. Sure, Slashdot is good publicity for Andover, as we all know Slashdot has a large, and somewhat dedicated following. Having looked at the pictures of Andover's area at a few conferences / events in the Linux world, and couldn't help but laugh at the Slashdot sign, tilted up for all to see. It's quite interesting that a website that started as a fun way for Malda to show the world about Linux, and the news that surrounded it, became a website that is sponsored by a huge company with lots of money, and a website that is gaining more and more attention everyday.
Don't get me wrong, I love Slashdot, and I commend each and every person who's put work into the Slash code and who has made Slashdot into what it is today, but I think that if Andover can afford $100,000 for a simple contest, the amount Malda, Bates and Oostendorp (sorry if I spelt that wrong) are getting should also be remotely close to that high figure. By the way the authors post on Slashdot, this high figure is not being received.. unless they just don't want us to know that they make 3 times the amount of the prizes in the "Beanie Awards".
Slashdot for me used to be a place where I didn't have to worry about commercializing everything available, but now I see it as a de-sensitized company jumping on the bandwagon of all the other profitable websites. Too bad this one story changed my point of view.
Matthew
_____________________________________
sortakinda.ca | canadian paraphrasing.
so vote for me. I'll give you a cookie. One per vote if I win
Bad things often happen to good people,
It is up to them to see that they remain good.
C'mon, guys, why link to the domain of some slob trying to get the Python people to buy a domain from him? Link to the real site.
--Matt
I nominate Advogato for best open source advocate. While the better-known open source advocates have been racking up major publicity points for themselves and doing the impossibly hard work of selling big business the idea of software that doesn't cost them anything, Advogato has been working for the most part quietly to help the community of open source developers, the people who actually write all this code the rest of you are so fond of evangelizing.
:)
P.S. The rules said nothing about nominations not being allowed to be self-serving
LILO boot: linux init=/usr/bin/emacs
- The late, great Rich Stevens's children's college fund
- Larry Wall's children's college fund
- Dennis Ritchie's retirement fund.
(Perhaps those count as charitiesMark Pauline: Head of Survival Research Laboratories and fundrasing manager for the etoy projects. His projects have been an inspiration to hardware and software hackers alike, blowing away anything you can make with a lego mindstorm. (You try shooting two-by-fours at a high rate of speed with legos...)
Mark Pauline is the Bob Geldorf of cool technology projects. Where would we be without him pushing the limits?
By the way. Toywar is up and running
No Zen is good zen
-----------
"You can't shake the Devil's hand and say you're only kidding."
I wish you'd log into the nominations forum
and post these there because your list has some
of the best suggestions I've seen so far and
yet this needs to be posted in the niminations
forums not here.
Allow me to be one of the many, many people to nominate the Ziff-Davis (ZD Group) in it's many forms.
Their particular style of "rip and read" journalism, and complete lack of objectivity over the years, has earned them the respect and honor of only the most "clue starved" trolls all over the world. It is my belief that this perverse propagation of Fear, Uncertainty, and Doubt (FUD) puts the ZD Group among the front runners in the race for a firm twack with the /. Cluestick.
More to the point, I would like to nominate the hard work and dedication of the many ZDnet interns who (like so many sweatshop workers in a Nike factory) tirelessly toil to cut and paste microsoft press releases into Jerry Bursts' article of the day.
ZDs' blatant pursuit of mediocrity makes them a prime candidate for The Cluestick Award for FUD in Journalism.
_________________________
I hearby announce my candidacy for 'Best dressed'.
Some of you may be asking yourself why you should vote for me. Simple. Best dressed isn't what label you wear, whither or not the cufflinks are real gold, etc. It's how you use attitude to make the look work.
Speaking as someone who successfully pulled off wide lapelled mohair at the formal company Christmas party, combat boots and leather jacket at innumerable weddings, and constantly gets positive comments about his misuse of military-surplus gear in the corporate work environment, I feel I deserve the award.
.sig: Now legally binding!
Look, we all know that we spend more time playing games than most of these other things combined... so how about a category for best freely available game?
Thanks for the link. The one in my bookmarks was no longer valid, and I couldn't find it on the new livid sight.
The Future of Human Evolution: Autonomy
I made a point of producing all these textures in .xpm format (_months_ ago) so they could be native Linux tiles and background textures. On the agenda, I need to go make .bmp versions of everything available for the underprivileged- I didn't know until recently that Windows could not use a simple gif or jpg as a background unless the hapless Windows user turned on Active Desktop.
All these things are absolutely original work, put out there just to use with no strings attached and the sincere request of 'Just don't claim these as your own OK?'.
http://www.airwindows.com/desktops/index.html- Desktop pictures
http://www.airwindows.com/graphics/backgrounds/ind ex.html- Tiling backgrounds
http://www.airwindows.com/graphics/tiles/index.htm l- Window manager tiles, including treatments such as vertically tiling effects and 3D effects, plus stuff like wood tiles with binding like on a guitar
http://www.airwindows.com/graphics/titlebars/index .html- Intended as Window Maker titlebars, very likely usable in other WMs as well
http://www.airwindows.com/graphics/webgifs/index.h tml- Textured but undistracting 'paper' backgrounds. All available in .xpm as well: designed to be completely compliant with the Web Safe 216 color palette.
Anyone griping about there being gifs should be pleased that at least I don't have Windows .bmps yet ;) well, whatever. I'm sure Enlightenment is going to win or something, but I don't care- I have been fighting for a loan to get an ADAT recorder (to help people record unauthorized music and put out mp3s ;) ) and will keep on doing so. If I win $2000 I pledge I will buy a x86 Linux box to go with my PPC dualboot :)
Cheers, slashdotters. *back to real life*
...I can't find any information on this person
Slashdot throwing money around? Remember back when Malda was a poor college kid? My how thing have changed.
--Lenny
it has been obvious for a long time, that when the writers on slashdot think opensource, they are actually just thinking linux. and this is why i have been reading slashdot less and less, and will certinaly not be wasting my time voting on these stupid categorys.
where is the support for the tiny, just starting out, os's? why do the writers for slasdot still keep disilusioning themselves that linux is best for EVERYTHING, when it clearly is not? (infact, nothing is)
Carol was born in London but moved to America at age five. She was schooled in Texas and California before returning to England in 1960 to study at R.A.D.A. Her early tv credits include The Saint, The Avengers, Man in a Suitcase, Randall and Hopkirk (Deceased) and the comidies Doctors at Large, Father Dear Father and The Two Ronnies.
Aside from her appearances in the Monty Python's Flying Circus series for BBC, she has been featured in all the Python films, stage shows and record albums, becoming known as The Python Girl
More recently she has been seen in Are You Being Served? and Only Fools and Horses. She has done much stage work, covering a wide variety of comedy drama and pantomimes. She has also written and performed her own one-woman show entitled Carol Cleveland Reveals All, an autobiographical and humorous look at the glamour business.
and now you know the rest of the story ;-)
Bad things often happen to good people,
It is up to them to see that they remain good.
Should only take a couple hundred lines (less?) of perl to: (1) Create unique yahoo email account. (2) Create ./ account using this email account. (3) Fetch POP mail from yahoo and parse ./ password. (4) Logon to ./ and cast vote of choice (5) Goto (1) Perhaps these should be named "best script kiddie" award? Ken
1. The nomination process is wide open so
you are welcome to login and make your case for
whoever your feel deserves the money more than
the usual well-known projects. Imagine that you
could actually post a persuasive argument to help
an under-funded project which you depend on rather
than standing on the sidelines and bitching that
nobody does anything for open source developers.
2. You have to be logged in to vote. I'm not sure
about the internals but I'm sure this is because
there is code under here that will specifically
exclude any vote bots.
3. Andover doesn't allow other Linux news sites to
carry word of these awards??? What are you high?
This was sent out as a press release today and is
already announced on LinuxToday.
So you're the type who doesn't vote because you
feel democracy doesn't work, right? Nice attitude.
Glad to have you in the community. I'm sure all
the open source projects whose software you
depend on really appreciate having you do nothing
on their behalf. They ought to be thanking you.
One thing that crosses my mind when considering these awards are paying tribute to the coders/reverse engineers who have provided us with open source programs that allow us to use gadgets that are released with closed source Windows XX and Mac software only:
So here goes:
"The Snowblind Alliance" --
The fine folks whom without I could not use Linux to transfer files to my portable MP3 software.
"Anyone Involved with Video4Linux" --
All the way from the Kernel modules right down to the application level programs (XawTV, Kwintv) we could give out 3 or 4 of these awards to the people who let me watch TV in Linux while I surf the Web....
"Grip - Mike Olipant"
Anyone who rips MP3's in Linux, knows that this GTK based app is as good as they come in any operating system.
"CDRecord - Joerg Schilling"
Without this valuable tool, that $250.00 CD-RW player/recorder you just bought would be about as good and useful in Linux as that first 1 or 2 speed CD Drive you payed the same $250.00 for 10 years ago.
"Sane - David Mosberger-Tang "
It's really nice to be able to scan with Linux rather than have to maintain a dual boot...
"PHP - The PHP team "
The open source hammer that ensures we do not have to use inferior operating systems to provide easy access to corporate data stores or build dynamic web pages....(Perl is good...but is not quite as easy as PHP)
"Any Linux propaganda or news reporting award on the list should go to Joe Barr and Nicholas Petreley at Linux world....They do a great job in covering the items the rest of us can't find the words to describe...."
The above items (and many others I did not list) are crucial to widespread desktop acceptance of Linux. I did not list many server related items because I believe that any *nix has always been the logical choice for server realted tasks anyway...So in my mind the market is already won.
IMHO
Sure, projects like KDE/Gnome (no flamewar please) or Mozilla are important, but they are sponsored enough by other sources, we don't need to support them that badly.
/. poll every six months giving out five 1000$ prizes...
What is needed more IMHO is support for all those small coders who use a few weeks of their spare-time to write useful utilities for free (the type of software which would be distributed as 20$ shareware under Windows).
So why not create a foundation?
If the money was invested with a 10% interest, we would have roughly 5000$ dollars per half year available.
We could then have a
screen rocks... specially for IRC... though BitchX has it's own screen manager built in :)
Open Source. Closed Minds. We are Slashdot.
(* Sigh! *)
Exokernels are =NOT THE SAME= as Microkernels, although they borrow from the same basic idea. They take it to new heights, though, putting -everything- but the kitchen sink in User Space, rather than Kernel Space.
This gives you the same benefits of Microkernels, but without the drawback. By having only an absolute minimum in Kernel Space, you don't have the context switching overhead that Microkernels had, which slowed them down. Instead, you only dive into kernel space when absolutely necessary. The practical upshot is that you get even fewer context switches than you do in a monolithic kernel, so you're not wasting as much time on such trivia.
In the benchtest on their website, ExoPC was shown to be nearly 1,000 times faster than FreeBSD at basic network operations. That's not a bad speed improvement, given FreeBSD is hardly a laggard.
It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)