Slashdot Mirror


More Companies Jump on the Linux Train

"X Company now supports Linux" announcements are coming in thick and fast these days. Examples: yesterday J Ellerbroek sent this link for Aureal's Linux drivers and Drakar wrote, "I e-mailed Sigma Designs asking them about Linux support for the RealMagic Hollywood Plus DVD Decoder, and they say they're working on supporting Linux for a future product." And Nicholas Tang turned us on to this announcement about an upcoming open sourced RPG with a Linux client. Very nice! But we're getting so many of these announcements that we can't possibly run them all. If you've spotted any others recently, please post them below. (Click for more.)

I had a thought while I was typing the words above: should Slashdot do periodic "roundups" of new Linux ports and support announcements? With so many hardware and software vendors now moving into the "Linux marketplace" (which is how many of them see Linux -- as a marketplace), these announcements are no longer "news" in the sense of being unique or unusual events, but they're still good to know about.

Should we make a weekly post out of all these announcements? Or, because they don't come in at an even rate, should we save them up until we have 10 or so and post them all then whether that takes two days or three weeks?

So, besides posting any new Linux product/support announcements you've seen lately, how about a little advice on how Slashdot might best handle these announcements in the future? I promise to read every comment with a moderation level of zero or higher.

- Robin "roblimo" Miller

42 of 178 comments (clear)

  1. "In a future product" by scjody · · Score: 4
    There has been discussion of this on the LiViD mailing list for quite some time. What gets me is that Sigma Designs could easily release the specs and allow Linux to be supported in their current product, but instead they're making Linux users buy a whole new card.

    And we're supposed to be pleased with this?

    --

    "...Is this world not a call I can screen out" --

    1. Re:"In a future product" by tagish · · Score: 2
      This highlights a general problem. Some companies are embracing Linux (/Open Source/whatever) because they've actually had some kind of epiphany and can see a way for their company to join the revolution. Others have noticed that Linux is getting a lot of publicity and have worked out that /. and others are willing to publicise their company if they make some kind of 'supporting Linux announcement'.

      Perhaps there is a case for a /. spin-off site that watches companies that make Linux related commitments over a period of time and attempts to assess the sincerity of those company's efforts.

      --
      Andy Armstrong
    2. Re:"In a future product" by damyan · · Score: 5

      Where I was working last year they had several marketing ideas floating around -- one was 'lets see if we can get this on Slashdot'. (Along with 'lets email everyone on the internet' and 'lets fax every fax machine in the UK' -- they weren't very bright)

      The point is that the unscrupulous could quite easily get themselves onto /. and basically (in their eyes) reap in the same benefits that spam provides them with.

      I think that perhaps /. should ignore announcements like 'we'll be supporting linux in a future product' and only post ones like 'version 1 of xxx for linux is out'.

    3. Re:"In a future product" by ralphclark · · Score: 2

      There already *is* a freshmeat slashbox. Duh.

      Consciousness is not what it thinks it is
      Thought exists only as an abstraction

  2. Linux? What about Free Software? by Kaufmann · · Score: 5

    At the risk of coming off as some unholy Stallman-wannabe, I have to say this.

    Linux isn't what's important. Free Software is.

    Linux is software, and software comes and goes. Whether some company or other jumps on the Linux bandwagon is irrelevant in the big picture. What is truly important is to spread Free Software in general - not only the software itself, but the accompanying meme that says, essentially, that "sharing is profitable". The catch is to ingrain this idea into our culture in the same way that sharing is already ingrained in the scientific and mathematical communities.

    Once we've done that, we'll have achieved something much greated than pressuring a lot of companies to support a Free operating system. We'll have dominated the world. Because world domination is not achieved by actually taking over the world, but by having the world think that you're in control of it.

    (Again, sorry for the rant. I'm in extended no-sleep mode.)

    --
    To the editors: your English is as bad as your Perl. Please go back to grade school.
    1. Re:Linux? What about Free Software? by tagish · · Score: 2
      There are a load of 'commitment to Linux' announcements at the moment because that's what the world's media are talking about. I agree with you that companies that 'get it' are more likely to embrace open source in general as opposed to thinking Linux == the whole thing.

      Also, why does Linux support so often end up being X86 only? Within 5 feet of me I have Linux running on Sparc, StrongARM and PowerPC, but there are many Linux applications distributed as binaries only that I can only use on an Intel box.

      --
      Andy Armstrong
  3. Leave this to Linux Weekly News by The+Pim · · Score: 4

    In answer to roblimo's question, I find that Linux Weekly News (www.lwn.net) already does an excellent job of such roundups. This isn't something slashdot needs to duplicate.

    --

    The evaluation of an action as 'practical' . . . depends on what it is that one wishes to practice.
    1. Re:Leave this to Linux Weekly News by Raindeer · · Score: 3

      I think that in the end it doesn't really matter who does this.. It could be Freshmeat, Linux Daily, Linux Weekly, *Linux Drivers* or Slashdot... What does matter is that there should be, a source for all the new releases...
      In my opinion it would be best to have it on another site as Slashdot, since Slashdot is more about discussing news and not about Linux drivers :-) But it would be nice to have a link to the site, just like with Freshmeat. So see this as a way to start your own Linux site, or for other sites to expand their business...

    2. Re:Leave this to Linux Weekly News by pb · · Score: 2

      God, I didn't realize how much slashdot truly sucks these days... All those patent stories were bad enough (and now there are *too many* company-doing-foo-with-linux announcements to post. Oh darn. Well, here's a hint, next time you're posting "Big Corporation Sues Bobby Over Cheerios", say "Wait, I've got this cool corporation porting product FOO to Linux article here, too. Hmm."

      Lest you think this is unsubstantiated, read some of Linux Weekly News. How could slashdot have sunk so low as to not post an article by The Gartner Group? That's some important press, and it sounds like it's getting better. Heck, I haven't even seen a good Linux opinion story in a while, and I like to see what the mainstream is being told even when the articles are mostly just recycled. This is more important, because this is what the *corporations* are being told.

      (Patiently waiting for a Linux+Crusoe server announcement. Hopefully they'll wait a bit before the other-VLIW-chip-makers try to crush them...)
      ---
      pb Reply or e-mail; don't vaguely moderate.

      --
      pb Reply or e-mail; don't vaguely moderate.
  4. Proposal: Linux announce page by Paolo · · Score: 3

    I would image in the best way to go about this would to have a Linux announce page, which would have a submission form for companies or observant end-users to give their announcements to slashdot. This would be off of the main page, and once a /. moderator looked at the email acct or whatever where the submissions went to, he/she could post them on the page.

    How is this accessible on the main page? A slashbox of course! Make it a default one so everyone can see what's been announced in a box on the main page.

    --
    "In individuals, insanity is rare, but in groups, parties, nations, and epochs it is the rule." -Nietzsche
  5. Veritas to support Linux by AdamT · · Score: 2

    Personally I'm -very- excited about this one. Enterprise level mass storage (there's more to veritas than just filesystems) is one of few sticking points for linux making the move from utility to work horse. Having the same bullet proof, flexible FS on my linux box as I have on my Solaris box.... drool.... :)
    http://www.computerworld.com/home/print.nsf/al l/000121E29E

    --
    ... with eskimo chains i tatto my brain all the way...
  6. Aureal's Linux drivers violate GPL? by Stiletto · · Score: 3

    I took a look at the released linux drivers posted at Aureal's site and they seem to be violating the stock-GPL lisence they distribute it with!

    The driver is released in the form of a single C "wrapper" file that links with the main portion of the driver, which is binary-only. Does this seem to any of you to be a sneaky way to say they are delivering source, but in fact are not?

    IANAL, but from what I have always believed the GPL meant, you can't link GPL code with binary-only modules.

    Can anyone knowledgable comment on this?
    ________________________________

  7. Gear CDR too by whoop · · Score: 3

    I noticed over at Gear's web page that they say a Linux version is coming "soon." I have been looking for VideoCD software for quite a while, either recording or playing 'em. Hopefully this will be one step closer.

  8. Linux is important! by rogerbo · · Score: 5

    Sorry, I beg to differ and I bet a lot of other people do to.

    I don't require that everypiece of software is GPL'ed, or even that every piece of software is freely available in any form.

    Binary only software distribution has it's place and so does (gasp horror) binary only software that you have to pay money for.

    What is important about linux gaining mainstream driver support (even in binary only form) is that people now have a real choice in the future on intel rather than being forced to use Microsoft operating systems by default.

    With the mostly collapse of non-intel architecture unix platforms in the workstation market (Sun, SGI, HP etc) we needed a robust unix based low cost alternative.

    Linux is it, and I don't care if some software is binary only or I have to pay money for it.

    1. Re:Linux is important! by Guy+Harris · · Score: 2
      FreeBSD could have done it a decade ago

      Well, more like 7 years ago; the first FreeBSD came out in late 1993.

      but for some reason they just didn't have that Linux mojo

      The AT&T lawsuit might have contributed to that, at least in part.

  9. hard core real time 3D by Agent+Drek · · Score: 2

    I've been beta-testing houdini on linux:

    http://www.sidefx.com

    sweet. I even used the renderer and scene generator under FreeBSD ... no prob. Worked like a charm.

  10. Linux on non intel(was Re:Linux is important!) by dodobh · · Score: 2

    I use Linux on an Intel Processor, but what about those who don't work on Intel machines? Remember that Linux is the most widely ported OS. Binaries will serve the Intel population, but not all Linux users. And again you are forgetting about other OSs like BSD. I will be replacing windoze with Open BSD about July (after graduation). Drivers matter to me. Source for the drivers will help in selling more hardware for these companies.

    Which is why the Open Source/ Free Software meme is more important than the OS itself. Remember, the idea is to support the meme, not an OS on one platform.

    --
    I can throw myself at the ground, and miss.
  11. No source? Pfft. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2
    I'm all for announcing new products/services for Linux on Slashdot, periodically or metrically.

    I wouldn't smile at this list though if every company on there was only releasing closed source and proprietary products, though.

    To get community support, you need to be friendly to the community. That means you can't try any lock-in bullshit, nor obfuscated code, nor "OH, THAT'S PRIVATE INFORMATION. WE HAVE NEEDS, SORRY :))".

    How about we only post products that are 100% open source? Tbat means that you are in fact giving publicity to products that would support this community, and in turn be providing a true community service, and you'd also, indirectly, encourage them to strive to get on your list.

    Open source as in, not some cheapassed Acme Public License, but one that is recognized and accepted.

    Of course, there are also those people who just want a Windows clone without Microsoftian dominance. Our viewpoints differ here. Oh well.

    --Michael Bacarella

  12. Merant and RIMS porting to Linux by Ark · · Score: 3
    Since you said "If you've spotted any others recently, please post them below," I'll take you up on the offer. :)

    The company I work for, RIMS, and a vendor of ours, Merant, will have a joint press release out tomorrow. The process release will be about Merant's porting of their Micro Focus Object COBOL stuff to Linux and our efforts to port our QicClaim/2 product to the COBOL port on Linux. <marketing speak>QC/2, as with all our software, is aimed at the healthcare verticle market. QC/2 is used to administrate health benefit programs, mostly used be third party administrators.</marketing speak>

    No, its not open sourced, but its the start of greater use of Linux and open source projects within my company. Something I've been fighting a year for. We hope to have some open source stuff out there in the near future. We're deceiding the what, where, and when of all that. But I'm pretty excited as I'll be a big part of all of it.

  13. Linux Anouncements by chabotc · · Score: 5

    I think i'd like a combination of some of the above ideas.

    First create a anounce section, in which every 'anouncement' is an article. This gives people the option to discuss every anouncement, eg those aurol 3d drivers seem to be a nice discussed item, so why stomp the discussions.

    Then create a slashbox, to show the most N-recent anouncements. This alows people who are interested to see all the recent trafic on the 'anounce list', but ppl who dont care dont have to be confronted.

    Then every once a 'period' eg week, biweekly or whatever, do a roundup, as we do quickies every-once-in-a-while (Tm) currently, on the main page.

    This way people who want to read, and reply to everything, can.

    People who have questions on this release/anouncements, have a place to discuss.

    People who just care a little bit, can just read the slashbox, to get a @ a glance impression.

    People who care even less, will see an article commin by every week/ every other week, and get a quick glance @ what happend, and is of intrest...

    This way we should serve all people, and all desire levels.



    -- Chris Chabot
    "I dont suffer from insanity, i enjoy every minute of it!"

  14. Freshmeat by redhog · · Score: 4

    I think this type of announcements are not longer different from any announcement on Freshmeat, and should hence be moved over there, perheaps bundled in a pack of tens of them at once.
    While both /. and Freshmeat are now Andover.net sites, I have seen little or no cooperation between them, at least in the content field (I don't know about code cooperation).
    This may be regarded as troll, non-/.-ish or whatever, but please read it and think twize, before you moderate or comment.
    --The knowledge that you are an idiot, is what distinguishes you from one.

    --
    --The knowledge that you are an idiot, is what distinguishes you from one.
  15. Re:Aureal's Linux drivers violate GPL? Probably no by Le+douanier · · Score: 4


    For what you seem to describe we have a situation with the following schema:

    Binary driver --> C file (wrapper) -->Linux kernel

    Given that Linus specifically allowed binary drivers these are not violating the GPL FOR LINUX ONLY (Linus said it was Ok, but this only apply to Linux).

    They have a good reason to do this wrapper:
    Linus don't care that much if new kernels break the compatibility with binary-only driver (and IMHO he is right), so doing a wrapper to the driver allow them to just change this wrapper to keep the compatibility, they can also put the wrapper under the GPL (or, better for them, the LGPL) and hope that people using their hardware will help them keep the compatibility between kernels.

    It's a first step in the right direction (full Free Software driver) and this give them a first taste of Free Softare and we can only encourage them in it (by helping them keeping the compatibility and, when you submit the patch, tell them how great this would be for you and them if the driver was fully GPL'd).

    Of course your post didn't mention wether the wrapper was Free (speech) but there would be little advantage to give this wrapper otherwise.

    --
    "The obvious mathematical breakthrough would be development of an easy way to factor large prime numbers." Bill Gates,
  16. IBM OSS Still mostly engineer driven by Greyfox · · Score: 4
    Although IBM is announcing a very aggressive open source policy which basically says that all drivers and docs for any given device should be open unless the department can show a specific necessity to keep the source closed, the OSS movement in the company is still largely driven by the lower employees rather than management. This is actually starting to change, but IBM is such a big company that you still don't have a lot of OSS awareness in many of the groups that comprise the company.

    What you have to do is get a message to their marketing group that they do actually have Linux users and that demographic will get bigger for their hardware if they provide drivers. The best ways to do that is to E-Mail their tech support requesting that they send your message on to marketing or to open a suggestion defect requesting drivers and support for Linux. The justification is that the Linux market segment is growing and that Linux is the only non-MS OS on the market which is exhibiting such growth. Thus supporting Linux makes much more sense than supporting, say, OS/2, which IBM has been actively trying to kill for the last 5 years.

    The more requests of this nature that go into the company, the more you'll see OSS awareness in the company grow. It'll probably be a couple of years yet before the entire company is completely clueful on the subject but I think that day will come.

    --

    I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

  17. We don't need announcements... by Eccles · · Score: 5

    ...we need a web page. With summaries of each company's existing support (and non-support), the structure of this support (closed driver vs. published specs vs. open source driver), and announced plans. That web site could then have a weekly news report of new announcements.

    --
    Ooh, a sarcasm detector. Oh, that's a real useful invention.
    1. Re:We don't need announcements... by kocsonya · · Score: 2

      I agree with the need of the webpage and the idea it showing the type of support the vendor provides. IMHO it should also contain a little educational corner to explain Linux users what the whole thing is about.

      Recently someone on USENET started a petition for printer drivers for Linux (Winprinter stuff).
      Lots of commotion, much rejoycing. The scary thing was that very few people expressed that the petition should be for *documentation* and not (or not exclusively) for binary-only drivers.

      I would not ask for source of a HW vendor's drivers as long as they publish the HW specs. If they have "10+ years of software development invested in these drivers", I understand that they don't want to publish their code. However, if they publish the HW specs there can be the usual open-source alternative. If their drivers are so much better than what the programmer community can crank up, so be it. If I need the extra edge I can decide to use their binary driver, they can even ask for money for it. If I'm happy with the open stuff, I use that one. If I use my own homemade OS, I can still use their HW because I have the specs.

      That's my standpoint, of course. I do not consider myself as hardcode as RMS but current trends in Linux user circles seem to shift the emphasis from the "open" operating system to the "alternative to Windows" which is worrysome, IMHO.

      Kocsonya s.k.

  18. Linux is important! by Greyfox · · Score: 2
    Linux is really the catalyst that is raising this awareness of "Free Software." FreeBSD could have done it a decade ago but for some reason they just didn't have that Linux mojo and they blew it. That's why these days your manager might pull you aside and ask you how hard it would be to support Linux but if you mention FreeBSD you'll get a blank look.

    We may sneer at hype here, but that's what drives big companies. Huge IPOs, hundreds of articles, and industry analysts coming out asking the question "Is Linux a Windows Killer?" all go to convince big companies that there's something interesting in the OSS model. And OSS can actually fit into the corporate mentality. And programmers obviously can still make a living programming, witness all the companies currently picking up programmers to do coding for OSS projects on company time.

    --

    I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

  19. Pissed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2

    I'm getting really pissed at this, why is their almost no support for other OSs, like BeOS, *BSD, QNX4 etc.
    I mean, you people hate companies, you only want GPL and free beer.
    We, the others, how really care about free speach get almost zero support.

    1. Re:Pissed by HeUnique · · Score: 2

      First, don't be pissed..

      Linux currently is the media darling - everyone likes to see David vs. Goliath wars and many companies know that if they issue a press release with Linux on it- they're stock price jump. Nice, isn't it?

      Regarding QNX - this is a COMMERCIAL operating system - the guys at QNX should talk to other vendors to port their apps to QNX. The problem is - QNX market share is WAY lower then Linux market share - and as it is - it's not worth to port it.

      --
      Hetz (Heunique)
    2. Re:Pissed by Inoshiro · · Score: 2

      "I mean, you people hate companies, you only want GPL and free beer."

      If it's under the GPL, you have the code...

      If you have the code, you can port it to other OSes..

      The BSDs seem to work fine with GPL stuff, SCO has the skunkware CD.. It's not our fault that Be or QNX don't port the GPL software over and submit their changes back to the tree.. If you want more apps, help port over the libs and such. GNX and BeOS both are Unixy enough to allow easy porting (compared to Win32) of libs and apps.

      And just because the code is GPLed, doesn't mean the software is free (like Quake -- GPLed code, pay for the pack file)..
      ---

      --
      --
      Internet Explorer (n): Another bug -- that is, a feature that can't be turned off -- in Windows.
  20. Sigma will probably need some convincing. by GauteL · · Score: 2

    If all of you that own Sigma-cards could send
    a polite mail to arthur_bao@sdesigns.com
    asking for Linuxsupport for current products.

    The polite part can't be stressed to much.

    1. Re:Sigma will probably need some convincing. by paled · · Score: 2

      Hi.

      I'm glad to hear that your company plans to release a DVD decoding (MPEG-2) card in the future with Linux support. I'm dissappointed to hear that no support is planned for the existing Hollywood Magic card (I've bought 2 - xmas gifts).

      It might be true that by putting Linux support in a future card could get users to buy a second card - if no other card supports Linux before you release the new card.

      But - if the ATI Rage Fury card decode DVD's acceptably with Linux - I won't need any additional hardware for DVD decoding.

      So just annoucing future Linux support for a future product doesn't get you any sales in my book - in fact, it causes me to recommend to friends to *not* buy your current cards.

      But the idea of future Linux support a good start ...

      Paul

      --
      .
  21. new side bar option? by xcjohn · · Score: 2

    Just a suggestion, add an optional box to the side of slashdot's main page for new products supporting linux.

    --
    ~~~ They call me Little John, but don't let the name fool you...in real life I'm very big.
  22. Tommorow: VMWare 2.0 beta by HeUnique · · Score: 4

    Well, I just got the word from VMWare:

    Tommorow there will be a public beta of VMWare 2.0, and they included support for SCSI, Sound-in, Major improvment of running Windows 95/98 as a guest, Shrinking disk, Larger then 2GB Virtual disk support, and other goodies.

    Check tommorow: http://www.vmware.com

    --
    Hetz (Heunique)
  23. Probably most companies are like this by DragonHawk · · Score: 2

    ...the OSS movement in the company is still largely driven by the lower employees rather than management.

    Indeed. In fact, I would expect most companies to be like this. Management is generally only good at keeping people in line and on the job (and sometimes not even that). It always seems to be the engineers and techies "in the trenches" who know which way the wind is blowing first. No great surprise there. Of course, with a company as large as IBM (Incredibly Big Monolith), inertia plays that much bigger a role, reaction time is much slower, and some parts of IBM will still be swinging around when The Next Big Thing is happening.

    --

    dragonhawk@iname.microsoft.com
    I do not like Microsoft. Remove them from my email address.
  24. Yeah! by Greyfox · · Score: 2
    I buy my hardware on one very important criteria: Linux support. If a device isn't supported in Linux, I don't want to buy it. The more support a company provides for Linux, the more likely I am to buy their product. For instance, after looking at the Creative Labs open source page and what Aureal's offering, I've pretty much decided to buy a Sound Blaster live. I consider open source drivers to be very important. I bought a Matrox G400 instead of a geforce card because Matrox seems to provide most of the specs needed to implement 3D, not just some obstuficated driver source or a vague promise that sometime in the future a maybe-opensource maybe-binary driver will be released by the company.

    By the same token I have room in my philosophy to buy binary-only software such as games. However, show half-assed support for the game (Such as a huge feature mismatch between Windows and Linux versions) and I may get pissed off and never buy anything from your company again. If you're not going to open the source up, you damn well better be willing to commit to maintaining it yourself. DOS/Windows users might be willing to accept game companies doing half-assed jobs on their software -- certainly I've seen enough games where the coding was obviously done by brain dead chimpanzees. Linux users are a more demanding crowd, though. If you're going to put out software that sucks, we don't want you here.

    --

    I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

  25. Re:Aureal's Linux drivers violate GPL? Probably no by Le+douanier · · Score: 2


    Unless he agreed this with ALL contributors to the code, he doesn't have any power to override the existing licencing terms. Those terms (GPL) eitehr permit binary only drivers (or are unable to prohibit them) or they don't.

    True, but I didn't hear about any developer complaining, in which case they would have to retire his code from the kernel.

    If you are not happy you can fork the kernel and make it truly GPL, but don't count on us to follow you and don't forget to call it otherwise than Linux (Lunix if you want, or Trollix).

    --
    "The obvious mathematical breakthrough would be development of an easy way to factor large prime numbers." Bill Gates,
  26. Not the first open source online RPG, btw by P_Simm · · Score: 3
    Just thought I'd mention, Worldforge is a project that's been going for more than a year now and is making terrific progress. It's a fully open source, volunteer driven online RPG system. This includes a server-client protocol allowing for multiple clients and multiple servers, and full customizability for individual servers. They're also developing a full fantasy RPG world, plus a couple of other game worlds using the same technology.

    They've got over a dozen people working on the project, including both coders and artists. There's definitely room for more help though. (I'm not directly involved in the project, although I will be as soon as I can find more time.)

    Click the link in my sig for more info.

    --

    You know what to do with the HELLO.
    Help create an open-source world ...

    1. Re:Not the first open source online RPG, btw by Bryce · · Score: 2
      They've got over a dozen people working on the project, including both coders and artists. There's definitely room for more help though.

      Definitely can use more help. We've actually got about three or four dozen active developers, plus maybe another fifty or a hundred semi-active developers. There's well over two hundred registered with developer accounts and subscribed to our mailing lists.

      We're especially looking for webmaster types (got a lot of online docs to clean up and maintain) these days. We've got coders aplenty but would never turn away more. ;-) Musicians and artists are strongly valued, we've got a good team of them so far but always need more.

      Last year we put out a skeleton demo, which is available from our Downloads page. (We'd hoped Slashdot would post an announce about it, but no dice.)

      LibAtlas is our "Crown Jewels" - a result of a full year of design, planning, peer reviewing, and general hair pulling. It's a standard(izable) networking protocol suitable for games and for other data-type-rich applications. We'll try to post an announcement here (ok, probably won't get posted; watch our site) once we've had time to write docs and some sample apps.

      One thing worth noting is that WorldForge is producing a number of other things besides the game itself. We've developed several libraries and tools which we've independently released on Freshmeat and SourceForge (libuta, for instance, the GUI library for SDL, is developed by our team members.) We've got several project management tools in development that other open source projects will find invaluable. Plus, just to be different we actually practice what we preach and make ALL of the source to our tools, apps, art, music, and etc. openly available for public download and reuse. ;-)

      We think we might be able to kill a bunch of birds for the Free Software community, by taking the extra step of designing our systems to be as game-neutral as possible, and have made our project infrastructure very robust. Thus, we can directly help any other Game Development Projects with roughly similar needs as us. So we'd like to welcome any GPL-compliant game development projects to come on by and discuss joining forces to develop mutually beneficial libraries, apps, or other tools.

      Keep an eye on our News page for the latest developments. If you're interested in joining in the fun, head to our joining page.

  27. Maybe LWN could make a profile page by Greyfox · · Score: 2

    LWN seems to do an excellent job of rounding up various products each week. Maybe they could do a company profile page detailing the level of support you can expect from the company and whether buying from them would be a safe move or not. Rate the company on some scale (Maybe -10 to +10?) and sort on the rating. Then I can go see at a glance who I want to buy from.

    --

    I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

  28. Well said, sir! by Kaufmann · · Score: 2

    Thank you, Mr Hugo, for putting it so very concisely. I wish my writing made half as much sense as yours. :)

    On a side note, I'm glad that I could help provoke such intelligent talk with my original post, and help show that good things still come from Slashdot. :)

    --
    To the editors: your English is as bad as your Perl. Please go back to grade school.