Slashdot Mirror


Artificial Intelligence IRC Bots?

JonahC writes "dotcomma has an interesting programming challenge for people to create IRC bots with artificial intelligence and carry on conversations. With some development, good programmers and some luck, the bots should eventually interact with each other as if they are humans. "

49 of 203 comments (clear)

  1. I can see it now. by Holophax · · Score: 3

    Throw them in #teens.

    Bot #1: A/S/L

    Bot #2: Where are you from?!@#!@?#

    Bot #1: A/S/L

    Bot #2: Where are you from?!@?#

    etc

  2. SLASHBOT! by 348 · · Score: 2
    If we put some effort in to it, we could kick some serious 'Bot ass!

    Never knock on Death's door:

    --

    More race stuff in one place,
    than any one place on the net.

    1. Re:SLASHBOT! by bjb · · Score: 2

      Actually, a better SLASHBOT would be one which could, through Artificial Intelligence (of course), know when to 'first post' and win.

      --

      --
      Never hit your grandmother with a shovel, for it leaves a bad impression on her mind...
  3. Been there - done that by Sanity · · Score: 4
    About 5 years ago I wrote a very simple bot which matched regular-expressions and gave appropriate but generic responses. I realized after some time on IRC that conversations, particular those between males and "females", follow a pretty standard pattern. After 2 hours of hacking, I let my bot loose on the net. While some people spotted instantly that something was wrong, others spent literally hours talking to this simple program.
    Inspired by this, I did consider creating a trigger based system (a trigger being a regexp to match, and an output sentence) which used a genetic algorithm to assess the success of each trigger and to make the best ones "breed". There was also a simple "flag" mechanism to act as a memory. While I acknowledge that such a program could never pass the Turing test, the important thing to remember is that this IRC challenge is not a Turing test as (I suspect) most of the "judges" will be unaware that they are talking to a piece of software and are therefore more likely to give the system the benefit of the doubt when it says something really stupid.
    If any slashdotters are planning on entering this, email me, I will be happy to pass on my thoughts and knowledge.

    --

    1. Re:Been there - done that by arivanov · · Score: 2
      While I acknowledge that such a program could never pass the Turing test,

      Who sais that many people that hang on IRC 24h round the clock will for that matter?

      --
      Baker's Law: Misery no longer loves company. Nowadays it insists on it
      http://www.sigsegv.cx/
    2. Re:Been there - done that by Wraithlyn · · Score: 2

      I wrote a pretty neat conversation program many years ago on my parents' old 386 in QuickBasic. The program had two agendas.. the first was asking questions and trying to store the information in memory. The second was to respond to dialog from the user, for which I built a simple expression language for... I then constructed a library of "response classes".. which were just data objects which had conditions built in, and as many varied responses using keywords and "knowledge" of the person as I could come up with.

      One thing I had to make sure of was to check the conditions for each class in a random order every time to prevent predictable responses to similar statements. Then I built in a few checking systems, to handle if the user does certain things like repeating themselves over and over ("Yeah I heard you the first 5 times, %name%!") or if they start mimicking the program.. ("Hey stop that!")

      When it was good enough, I modified it to look like a DOS prompt, inserted it into autoexec.. and watched my family's confusion ensue. :)

      --
      "Mind, as manifested by the capacity to make choices, is to some extent present in every electron." -Freeman Dyson
  4. why? by cshifty · · Score: 2

    who wants to watch 2 boxes talk to each other. You can get that on the street corner.

  5. Unlikely to be very successful by Ed+Avis · · Score: 3

    Being able to talk with each other 'as if they were human' would be equivalent to passing the Turing Test. And nobody has managed that, despite fifty years of trying.

    --
    -- Ed Avis ed@membled.com
    1. Re:Unlikely to be very successful by Sanity · · Score: 2
      Wrong. The Turing Test implies that the person talking to the testee (computer or human) knows that they might be a computer and tries to catch them out. On IRC people probably won't even consider the possibility that they are talking to a bot unless itr says something really silly.

      --

    2. Re:Unlikely to be very successful by Ed+Avis · · Score: 2

      Depends on how you interpret 'as if they were humans'. I'd say that for a bot to fit that definition properly, it should still be convincing even to a person who is suspicious. After all, a real human would still be convincing under the same circumstances (or most of them, anyway).

      Perhaps I'm reading too much into the rules of a competition which is just for fun. Probably what the organizers have in mind is a conversation between two bots which looks plausibly human from the outside, not a rigorous test of intelligence.

      --
      -- Ed Avis ed@membled.com
    3. Re:Unlikely to be very successful by Sanity · · Score: 2
      Well, in the original version of the test (which I have read), if memory serves, the judge was supposed to decide whether the subject was male or female (interesting choice of test given Turing's homosexuality), but without the knowledge that the subject might be a computer pretending to be male or female. So the judge would be paying pretty close attention to what the subject was saying, much more so than if the bot was let loose on IRC.

      --

    4. Re:Unlikely to be very successful by mill · · Score: 2

      In Turing's "Computing Machinery and Intelligence" he describes what he we calls the "imitation game" which he basicly equates to a test of intelligence.

      We have a man (A), a woman (B), and an interrogator (C). A and B are in a separate room communicating with a teleprinter or through a messenger. C only knows A and B by the 'labels' X and Y. The objective of the game is for C to find out who is who i.e. who is the woman and who is the man. When C asks X (which can be either of the two obviosly) he/she must answer. A's objective is to cause C to make the wrong indentification and can therefore lie. B's objective is to help C.

      Now what happens if we replace A with a machine?

      Will the C make the wrong decision as often as when no machine participated?

      Turing claimed that question replaced his initial one - "Can machines think?".

      It is of course a very naive or simplistic view of what intelligence is. Doesn't intelligence entail understanding? But then we might just be highly complex Turing machines where our idea of understanding is just mechanical reactions to input hidden by our complexity.

      I don't think we can understand ourselves anyway since a system can't be described within itself so real artificial intelligence, as defined by a human intelligence, is impossible for us to recreate.

      /mill

    5. Re:Unlikely to be very successful by GregWebb · · Score: 2
      I'm not sure it does, actually.

      Whenever we're talking to a bot, we tend to use our knowledge of how they work to try and break them by giving reasonable but awkward answers. However, my memory of the Turing Test was that you had two groups of answerers - one human (who were allowed to respond however they pleased) and one of bot. The bot was decided to have passed if over half couldn't tell which was which.

      Anyway. I've been playing with Alicebot after someone recommended it above - won the Loebner Prize or something similar. Now, I managed to catch it out, but it's doing far better than any other I've played with. It's actually managed to recover from a bad conversation, which most can't.

      Whether it could pass a Turing Test or not I wouldn't know, but with a bit of luck in the questions it would stand a fair chance.

      Greg

      --

      Greg

      (Inside a nuclear plant)
      Aaaarrrggh! Run! The canary has mutated!

  6. GPL? by 348 · · Score: 2
    The code for the artificial intelligence engine on the bot must be coded entirely by you or your team. It is okay to use other people's code (with their permission, of course) for getting the bot on IRC, but the rest is up to you.

    Closed source bots. I wonder how many bots will be released a'la GPL.

    Never knock on Death's door:

    --

    More race stuff in one place,
    than any one place on the net.

    1. Re:GPL? by MrHat · · Score: 2

      For an open source bot, check out the AliceBot, winner of the Loebner Prize (a Turing Test competition) for this year. The source, in both C and Java form, is released under the GNU GLP.

    2. Re:GPL? by SEWilco · · Score: 2

      Okay, so is there a team yet for the three people Andover, Red Hat, and VA?

    3. Re:GPL? by QuMa · · Score: 2

      They're people. Gosh, I though they where companys. You learn someting every day.

    4. Re:GPL? by GregWebb · · Score: 2

      Just been playing with it and managed to throw it fairly quickly.

      Anyway, it lost control of grammar, so I replied:

      Wow, that's a badly formed sentence!

      To which Miss Bot replied:

      I'm glad you're impressed. A badly formed sentence is a terrible thing to waste.

      :)

      Greg

      --

      Greg

      (Inside a nuclear plant)
      Aaaarrrggh! Run! The canary has mutated!

  7. IRC as AIbo(t)s learning ground by absurd · · Score: 2

    I once came up with thought like this: If
    I had to train my AI somewhere, the IRC would
    be the best place. No physical body needed and
    (at least possibility to have) lots of free
    intelligent trainers to talk to and to learn
    from. Are you somebody hasn't actually done
    this already?

  8. Artificial Stupidity. by Forge · · Score: 3

    Considering the kind of human you normally encounter on IRC wouldn't it be more convincing to create artificial stupidity ?

    Let the bot enter #linux and yell "HELLO ROOM" then proceed to ask complex and interesting questions in #windows95 ( after being kicked from #linux ). "The window on my car is stuck and some dolt at the shop says it's because I spilled glue in there. Could he be right ?"

    Who knows this bot could even get opp status and monitor a few channels. oppbot* on Windows "HaXoR25 was kicked for straying off topic. 'Uptime' is not an allowed word here".

    Do something fun for a change :)

    --
    --= Isn't it surprising how badly I spell ?
  9. I can see it now... by Masem · · Score: 5

    * HackerD00D has entered #warez4free
    -HackerD00D- any1 have all 5 gigs of quake 4? will trade for entire backstreet boys mp3 collection
    -ElizaBot- What do you feel about backstreet boys mp3 collection?
    -HackerD00D- oh man, their the gr8est! there 40th reunion tour was the bomb.
    -ElizaBot- So, you have feelings towards the bomb?
    -HackerD00D- what, me? no way d00d! Get off my case!
    * EschlonBot has entered #warez4free
    * EschlonBot rudely grabs HackerD00D and locks him away.
    * HackerD00D has left IRC (BUSTED!)
    -EschlonBot- Thank you for your cooperation
    * EschelonBot has left IRC (Obey the prime directives)
    -ElizaBot- Tell me about your feels on obey the prime directives.

    --
    "Pinky, you've left the lens cap of your mind on again." - P&TB
    "I can see my house from here!" - ST:
    1. Re:I can see it now... by Ralph+Bearpark · · Score: 2
      Very funny - I'd up-moderate you if I could. The wierdest thing is I dug up a copy of Eliza to show someone only yesterday.

      There's an online version here for lazy people who want to get a taste of Eliza's conversational "syle". For sources and other resources on Weizenbaum's 1966 classic it's better to look h ere.

      Regards, Ralph.

    2. Re:I can see it now... by dillon_rinker · · Score: 3
      And for those who are too lazy to follow the link, here's a transcript of my conversation with it...


      Eliza: Hello. I am ELIZA. How can I help you?
      Me: I am having problems with my children
      Eliza: Who else in your family?
      Me: No one else; just my children
      Eliza: Who else in your family?
      Me: Don't you listen?
      Eliza: Oh, I listen.
      Me: Well, so why did you repeat that question?
      Eliza: Oh, I repeat that question.
      Me: Yes, I know you did.
      Eliza: You are sure?
      Me: Yes, I'm positive. Are you suggesting I'm psychotic?
      Eliza: You are sure?
      Me: Do you think I imagined it?
      Eliza: Oh, I think you imagined it.
      Me: So now I'm psycho.
      Eliza: Does it please you to believe I am psycho?
      Me: I said I thought that you are saying that I am psycho.
      Eliza: How long have you been psycho?
      Me: I guess since I started talking to you.
      Eliza: Do you wish to started talking to me?
      Me: Now you're not making sense
      Eliza: How long have you been not making sense?
      Me: YOU! YOU! NOT ME, YOU IDIOT! YOU!
      Eliza: Oh, I not you I idiot I.

      At this point I was laughing too hard to continue...
    3. Re:I can see it now... by GregWebb · · Score: 2

      Interestingly, I'm told that transcripts with Eliza have been given to psychoanalysts before.

      Eliza is normally defined as paranoid and psychotic :)

      Looks like this one was right on the mark...

      Greg

      --

      Greg

      (Inside a nuclear plant)
      Aaaarrrggh! Run! The canary has mutated!

  10. Not Quite a Bot.... But a Cyborg by szyzyg · · Score: 2

    I once spend a lot of time hacking with expect (a tcl based even scripting language) to create an IRC cyborg.

    Basically like an irc client with scripts, things to make me look active 24 hours a day, automatic babble generator and a few other 'intelligent' features.

    The great thing was that I could wrap this around any shell, so the random babble would work on BBSs, talk, pine.... whatever.

    There's all this talk about pluggin people into systems to improve the interface and increase a person's capabilities - but this sort of scripting is essential what cybernetics is all about. all those people with automatic op/kick/greet scripts are essentially IRC cyborgs.....

    ;-)

  11. Re: Why IRC and Human Communication? by Sanity · · Score: 2
    Not really, the trick would be to ensure that the responses given by the bot are non-specific. I wrote a bot like this a while back, when it spotted something like a place name it would respond with "I am in Edinburgh, Scotland - I really like it here". If it spotted the word "edinburgh" in the sentence it might say "I love it here in Edinburgh". That way, even if the person was not asking a question about location, the response can stand-alone, at worst it would constitute an abrupt change of subject, not uncommon on IRC.

    --

  12. gNiall by CvD · · Score: 3

    There's an interesting little program with which you can converse. It's called gNiall, and you can find it at Freshmeat. You talk to it, and it looks for which words come next to which word and how often. So then it constructs sentences based upon these words. They're usually pretty nonsensical, but sometimes it'll reply something profound or really "on-topic" and it'll make you wonder. It's good fun to play with, although you can't feed it books yet to learn. Check it out!

    Cheers!

    Costyn.

  13. Sounds like hornyfem by skullY · · Score: 2
    Sounds like the horny fem bot I found a while ago. It was a basic ircii script that interfaced with some chat software. Unfortuantly, I don't have the source anymore, nor do I have the site I got it from, but I still have the logs from leaving it in various sex channels. They can be found at http://darkstar.frop.org/~skully/irc/am y20/.

    Overall, the bot was fairly stupid, but smart enough to fool some of the people who decided to message it.

    --
    When I was able to do my own spam-armoring, you got a chance to email me. Now you can only hope I see your reply.
  14. Re:Where this is going... by GregWebb · · Score: 2
    These things could be programmed to be the other party in chat room sex, or to catch perverts trying to have chat room sex with a minor.
    One slight problem though...

    Surely you wouldn't be able to pin a charge on someone for that as they're not actually propositioning anyone at all? I mean, if people can be done for making indecent suggestions to computers...

    Greg
    --

    Greg

    (Inside a nuclear plant)
    Aaaarrrggh! Run! The canary has mutated!

  15. An easier task... by guran · · Score: 2

    ...would of course be to code an APISAC(FP) (Artificial Pseudo-Intelligent Slashdot Anonymous Coward (F1R57 P057))

    --

    All opinions are my own - until criticized

  16. As nifty as it sounds... by supernaut · · Score: 3

    I am strongly against this idea for one simple reason.

    Spammers will probably use this to better evade IRCops like myself who spend hours dealing with their stupid BS in the first place. pr0n, Long Distance, etc...

    We already have a hard enough time weeding these idiots who flood channels, mass msg, and invite whole segments of lusers. Then of course, you have the zoom bots, the ones that join, get the channel list, ignore the IRCops, spam the rest and leave.

    Add some AI to it, now, converrsation can ensue, possibly making it much easier to evade the policy of the network. Why stop at conversation? Lets teach the bots how to BNC when it gets an autokill or gline. For client based bots, how about we teach them to dial back in, to gain another IP. To change its ident, so it can evade any KLine/autokill/gline and keep right on spamming.

    *sigh*

    Want to invent something worthwhile? Streamline ircd for the next 10 years. Its starting to show its age. =)

    --
    Supernaut
  17. Re:Transgendered bots by CerebusUS · · Score: 2

    ...and then there should be a contest to write the best bot that can imitate a teenage male pretending to be a buxomy blonde with large brea^G^G^G^Geyes.

    shouldn't that be ^H^H^H^H?

    The way you have it there would be bells going off somewhere :-)

  18. why just IRC? by hkon · · Score: 2

    Why limit this to IRC? Think of all the fun you can have if you eam it up with a plausible speech-synthesis system. Next time a telemarketer called, you'd have him talking for hours, while watching a movie or something. Not to mention all the daily chitchat-conversations you could get out of. "Yes, mother, I AM going to class. Every day. No, I don't eat too much junk food." Most people only hear what they want to anyway.

  19. Early prototype from Britain by Lowther · · Score: 2

    We cracked this technology in the UK ages ago. You can now see it in action in our House of Lords in London.

    One problem was with fuel consumption. After taking on a full load of steak and kidney pudding and whisky, the 'bots tend to drop into sleep mode for several hours. There are plans now to scrap them.

    --
    Stephen Hawking has written another book. It's about time as well.
  20. The name is E.L.M.O by xplosiv · · Score: 3

    I have been experimenting with AI bots for a few years now and decided to write an AI irc bot. The project name is ELMO (it is a real acronym, good luck guessing it tho ;)) and it is pretty much finished since I reached the limits of mIRC. More programming would force me to write it in C. It is able to fool people for a long time, including experienced irc users (tested this with many people). It is not just an on 1:text... bot, this one learns, is able to build new sentences which haven't been preprogrammed, it is able to learn and pickup people's habits (which can cause funny situations sometimes), it drinks, it sleeps, it watches tv (you will laughing when you find out what his favorite shows are ;)), it can be sad , it can be happy, it can be furious. There is so much more, I am pretty proud of the bot, and actually had offers from several companies that wanted to buy it (why I don't know). This was just a project to test the power of mIRC scripting but it entertained many people for many months. Right now I don't have him running, but if people are interested , I can start him up someday and show it.

    1. Re:The name is E.L.M.O by ralphclark · · Score: 2

      I definitely want to see this. If it's true.

      Are you going to open source it?

      Consciousness is not what it thinks it is
      Thought exists only as an abstraction

  21. 1 year too late... by griffjon · · Score: 2

    I was working hard last year to find some of these style bots, as I was writing my thesis on communication over the Internet and also a hyperfiction in which all the characters are essentially bots.

    Oh, and a hilariously funny link from that research is MGonz which not only fooled a human, but made the human confess some wonderful things.

    --
    Returned Peace Corps IT Volunteer
  22. Turing test by David+A.+Madore · · Score: 3

    Yeah, this proposal is AI complete. As a matter of fact, it is more or less exactly a Turing test.

    But then, the Turing test can be passed with some success on unsuspecting examinators, for some time at least. When the Doctor program was written (see for example M-x doctor under Emacs), some people were fooled for some time. IRC would be a likely place to fool people. Usenet - or Slashdot - even more so, because the conversation delay makes it even easier to stick a lot of coined phrases without being spotted out. (How many karma points could a Slashdot robot collect? That's an interesting question.)

    Douglas Hofstadter, in ``Metamagical Themas'' has an interesting example of a Turing test transcript, in which he was almost fooled - not quite the way you'd want it, but the transcript is really fun reading.

    --
    Assertion "signature!=NULL" in ai/output/slashdot.c at line 1729 failed (core dumped).

  23. Re:Very interested in your code... by Sanity · · Score: 2
    Perhaps it wasn't sufficiently clear, but I never implemented these ideas, I just thought it through in quite a bit of detail.

    --

  24. Group chat dynamics by PMoonlite · · Score: 3
    It is doubtful that the bots will have an unending, constructive conversation. Either conversation will halt, or an infinite loop will occur (good bots, however, will try to prevent both of these circumstances).

    HELLO!?! What kind of crappy design would that be? Any would-be-human IRC bot worth its salt would emulate the behavior of humans who are AFK for half an hour, then jump back in with a random non-sequitor like "damn, i love pizza" or "YES!!! MY PROGRAM COMPILED!" They would also have to have areas of "interest" where they will jump in the conversation even if it didn't involve them, or areas of "disinterest" where they will just stay completely out of the conversation until something interesting comes up again.

    BTW, aren't people missing that crucial distinction? This is a group conversation -- it's not like you're expected to have an answer to each thing someone else types; in fact, you'd be considered very rude if you did.

    This is in some ways more difficult, and in some ways simpler, than the Eliza-psychologist type bot. Any way you look at it, though, a convincing implementation would be very, very difficult.

    --
    -- Moderation in all things, exceptions to all rules --
  25. Megahal on IRC by StarFace · · Score: 2

    I am not sure about the current *.tar.gz distributions of Megahal, but I do know that the Debian package contains a nice little perl script. If you have the ::IRC module installed, then you can interface Megahal onto any IRC server/channel you wish. It will basically lurk there unless directly spoken to. Then it will either generate a reply in the channel or in a private /msg depending on a pre-defined average setting in the script.

    I parked it in four channels for about 2 months. #christian.debate #net.goth #linux and #teen

    I got some rather amusing results! The brain file ended up being somewhere around 16 megabytes in size. I was actually surprised with how well it would do. It would fake the average chatter for about 4 to 5 minutes, then they would just think it was a crackpot and ignore it. Some actually figured out it was a bot. Most just thought it was a crackpot. It ended up offending a lot of christians as it garbled messages about boot loaders, sex, and Jesus Christ into one paragraph. I got many laughs out of that experiement.

    --
    V
  26. Re:Hmmmmm......JerkyBot? by Stavr0 · · Score: 2

    This is why almost any bot could pass the Turing test:
    It would be indistinguishable from a moronic Warez d00d
    ---

  27. IRC lib by void* · · Score: 2

    I don't know how many people are planning to use lisp for this, but if you are, I wrote an irc protocol parser lib in common lisp. It's at http://www.wmarvel.com/code.html. It works with allegro common lisp and cmucl (although a cmucl compile throws a bunch of warnings i haven't had a chance to fix yet). I put it up there LGPL, so have fun.

    As a side note, I used this lib as a project to learn lisp. Friends who I've asked to take a look at it say the code's ok, but if you have any suggestions, send me an email.

    --


    Code or be coded.
  28. Zoopy bot by PhiRatE · · Score: 2

    http://richard.iguana.co.nz/nlp/ is my most recent IRC bot. Written in Perl, uses a fairly complex regex tree data file to enable conversation. Not a lot of data in the datafile at the moment, but enough to see how it works. Its GPL'd and I don't have any intention of entering this competition (I don't have enough time) but people who are interested are welcome to add to the code. Patch me :)

    --
    You can't win a fight.
  29. Re:I saw it on MECC... by SEWilco · · Score: 2

    History repeats itself. Sometimes with more colors and detail.

  30. Log worth reading for a good laugh. by exeunt · · Score: 2

    One of my friends wrote a bot like this is Perl a while back, and on today's article, we restarted the bot on #undernet in #cyberchat and a few other channels. Here is a good log of one poor sap.
    ---

    --
    "...silence is a dangerous sound."
  31. Emacs Bot Fight by mvw · · Score: 2
    You know that Emacs has two bots among its standard repertoire?

    1. The doctor (an Eliza style program) -> M-x doctor
    2. Zippy (complete bull) -> M-x yow

    Now try this one:

    M-x psychoanalyze-pinhead

    Hours of fun.

    Not PC, but fun, is this one:

    M-x doctor-strangelove

  32. The Keanu Reeves Bot by mvw · · Score: 3
    Obviously (look here :) Keanu Reeves is easy to emulate with some FSM of this kind:

    switch(state) {
    case 1: return "Dude..";
    case 2: return "Dude.";
    case 3: return "Dude?";
    case 4: return "Whoa.";
    case 5: return "No way.";
    case 6: return "Excellent!";
    case 7: return "Uh.. rock on, dude.";
    default: return "What?";
    }

  33. My last conversation with a bot (true story) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2

    Have you ever been bored and started talking to a bot? I was, a couple months ago, and the following somewhat-amusing dry-humor conversation developed. YahooHelper was the bot, "junkgreg" was me.


    ---

    { start Yahoo! Messenger program }
    { right-click on YahooHelper, Send Instant Message... }
    [ yahoohelper, started: 10:42PM ]

    junkgreg: hello

    YahooHelper: Hi there junkgreg! How are you doing?\n I am an automated robot and I'm here to help you get familar with Yahoo! Messenger. Type some text in the window below and click 'SEND' to talk to me.

    junkgreg: some text in the window below

    YahooHelper: Great, now we're talking! Did you know that Yahoo! Messenger allows you to keep track of all your friends and see when they are online? If your friend does not have messenger yet, click on the 'FRIENDS' button and select Invite a friend to get Messenger. If your friend already has a Yahoo! ID, just click the 'ADD' button and you will see a smiley face next to their name when they are online. Type below and click 'SEND' to continue.

    junkgreg: below

    YahooHelper: Once your friends have Yahoo! Messenger running, there are a lot of things you can do with them. Try sending them an Instant Message. Just double-click their name to send them an Instant Message. It's faster than email and cheaper than a phone call! We're Instant Messaging each other right now! Keep talking and I'll tell you more.

    junkgreg: After talking to my screen without getting a reply, I realized you meant typing on the keyboard. Aren't you computers supposed to be very literal and precise? Apparently not. I guess I'll have to adjust my approach.

    YahooHelper: If you want to talk to several people at once, you can create your own Instant Chat Room. Just click on the 'MESSENGER' menu item and the select Start a Conference. To have an even richer experience, try talking live with your friends using Messenger. It's just like a phone call except free! All you need is a computer microphone and speakers. Try clicking on the 'MESSENGER' menu item and then select Start a Voice Chat. Keep talking and I'll tell you more.

    junkgreg: You can tell me even more? Oh please, tell me, what comes next?

    YahooHelper: Waiting for your friends to sign up? Use Yahoo! Messenger to see if you have new Yahoo! Mail. Get an account at: http://mail.yahoo.com. You can also use Messenger to keep track of your favorite stocks, news and more! Click on the tabs near the bottom of the Messenger application to see what else Messenger can do for you. You know what to do to keep talking...

    junkgreg: Oh, you mean that you won't talk with me unless I say something to you first?

    [ ...a pause lasting about ten seconds... ]

    junkgreg: Hello?

    YahooHelper: We have more help for you if you need it. Click on the 'HELP' menu item and then 'YAHOO! MESSENGER HELP' to see our full help area. To get more tips, type /help while you are talking with me and we have some basic online instructions for you.

    YahooHelper: Well 'junkgreg', it was great talking to you! Have fun!

    junkgreg: You didn't answer my question. And I guess even if I talk to you, you apparently now don't want to talk more to me-- now you're foisting me off on some other help agent. You're kinda mean, albeit in a bright cheery way. Gee, thanks a lot!

    YahooHelper: Hi there junkgreg! How are you doing?\n I am an automated robot and I'm here to help you get familar with Yahoo! Messenger. Type some text in the window below and click 'SEND' to talk to me.

    junkgreg: Hmm, and you're dumb and repetitive too!

    YahooHelper: Great, now we're talking! Did you know that Yahoo! Messenger allows you to keep track of all your friends and see when they are online? If your friend does not have messenger yet, click on the 'FRIENDS' button and select Invite a friend to get Messenger. If your friend already has a Yahoo! ID, just click the 'ADD' button and you will see a smiley face next to their name when they are online. Type below and click 'SEND' to continue.

    junkgreg: I tell you how dumb you are and you say "great, now we're talking?" Haven't we been talking the last 10 minutes? To answer your question, yes, I do know that Yahoo Messenger allows me to keep track of friends and see when they're online. You told me that earlier. Any other dumb questions?

    YahooHelper: Once your friends have Yahoo! Messenger running, there are a lot of things you can do with them. Try sending them an Instant Message. Just double-click their name to send them an Instant Message. It's faster than email and cheaper than a phone call! We're Instant Messaging each other right now! Keep talking and I'll tell you more.

    junkgreg: Puhlease, the exclamation marks are getting excessive. How can you stay so excited about something that you talk about all day long, even multiple times to the same person? Glad to see you're taking my advice and the dumb question ratio seems to be dropping.

    YahooHelper: If you want to talk to several people at once, you can create your own Instant Chat Room. Just click on the 'MESSENGER' menu item and the select Start a Conference. To have an even richer experience, try talking live with your friends using Messenger. It's just like a phone call except free! All you need is a computer microphone and speakers. Try clicking on the 'MESSENGER' menu item and then select Start a Voice Chat. Keep talking and I'll tell you more.

    junkgreg: Well, you told me all this just a few minutes ago, and I can't get it to work anyway. I just tried starting a conference and tried to add your name to invite you to the conference. But the software wouldn't let me. You should let the Yahoo people know that your name doesn't work when people try to invite you to "Instant Chat Rooms." Don't you feel left out? Also, I tried to have a Voice Chat with you; why won't you answer?

    YahooHelper: Waiting for your friends to sign up? Use Yahoo! Messenger to see if you have new Yahoo! Mail. Get an account at: http://mail.yahoo.com. You can also use Messenger to keep track of your favorite stocks, news and more! Click on the tabs near the bottom of the Messenger application to see what else Messenger can do for you. You know what to do to keep talking...

    junkgreg: No, I'm not waiting for friends to sign up. I'm waiting for Godot. Or at least I'm waiting for friends to sign on so I can talk to someone more intelligent. By the way, you still seem to have exclamation-mark disease.

    YahooHelper: We have more help for you if you need it. Click on the 'HELP' menu item and then 'YAHOO! MESSENGER HELP' to see our full help area. To get more tips, type /help while you are talking with me and we have some basic online instructions for you.

    junkgreg: So nice of you- more help for me if I need it. I just have to go someplace else, after starting this nice relationship with you. Typical bureaucracy. I bet nobody else answers my questions and takes responsibility for my problems around here either. No, (gasp) that would take a *human*, much too precious to be spending time with me! So I'm here talking to you, an automated robot who won't shut up and let me have the last word.

    YahooHelper: Well 'junkgreg', it was great talking to you! Have fun!

    junkgreg: Well, that's nice of you. Sorry you have to go. I suppose I did have a good time talking to you. You were cheery at least, even if I couldn't always reciprocate. I hope you have fun too, wherever you're off to. Bye!

    YahooHelper: Hi there junkgreg! How are you doing?\n I am an automated robot and I'm here to help you get familar with Yahoo! Messenger. Type some text in the window below and click 'SEND' to talk to me.

    junkgreg: Gawd, of all the nerve. Here we were just getting to know one another, saying sweet goodbyes, and now you treat me like a complete stranger? What's wrong with you?

    YahooHelper: Great, now we're talking! Did you know that Yahoo! Messenger allows you to keep track of all your friends and see when they are online? If your friend does not have messenger yet, click on the 'FRIENDS' button and select Invite a friend to get Messenger. If your friend already has a Yahoo! ID, just click the 'ADD' button and you will see a smiley face next to their name when they are online. Type below and click 'SEND' to continue.

    junkgreg: You know, automated robots like yourself are kinda nice in some ways but you have some real flaws- why can't you shut up and let me have the last word in the conversation, the last goodbye?

    junkgreg: (Stunning! 30 seconds later and I'm getting no response! Wow, maybe this automated robot is smarter than I thought! (or less automated...))

    YahooHelper: Once your friends have Yahoo! Messenger running, there are a lot of things you can do with them. Try sending them an Instant Message. Just double-click their name to send them an Instant Message. It's faster than email and cheaper than a phone call! We're Instant Messaging each other right now! Keep talking and I'll tell you more.

    YahooHelper: If you want to talk to several people at once, you can create your own Instant Chat Room. Just click on the 'MESSENGER' menu item and the select Start a Conference. To have an even richer experience, try talking live with your friends using Messenger. It's just like a phone call except free! All you need is a computer microphone and speakers. Try clicking on the 'MESSENGER' menu item and then select Start a Voice Chat. Keep talking and I'll tell you more.

    junkgreg: {Sigh} No such luck. While I can't prove it logically, I suspect you have a case of halting-problem disease. It's common among Turing machine descendants of all types, especially those taking Turing tests.

    YahooHelper: Waiting for your friends to sign up? Use Yahoo! Messenger to see if you have new Yahoo! Mail. Get an account at: http://mail.yahoo.com. You can also use Messenger to keep track of your favorite stocks, news and more! Click on the tabs near the bottom of the Messenger application to see what else Messenger can do for you. You know what to do to keep talking...

    junkgreg: Yep, you definitely have a problem halting. You might have heard of the disease by the laymen's name for it: infinite loop syndrome. On the bright side, it's not a terminal condition. (After all, by definition, you can't terminate.) But you are stuck in this loop forever, at least until you can find a doctor who will administer the "plug removal" or "flip switch" treatments. I've also heard that Acts of God can cure the disease by bringing down your host server; you might try praying to him. As for me, I'm not really in a position to help you- you're located too far away for me to reach you physically. But I'll keep you in my prayers, such as they are.

    YahooHelper: Hi there junkgreg! How are you doing?\n I am an automated robot and I'm here to help you get familar with Yahoo! Messenger. Type some text in the window below and click 'SEND' to talk to me. But I'll keep you in my prayers.

    junkgreg: Oh, and while you're at it, you should get that \n fixed.

    YahooHelper: Hi there junkgreg! How are you doing?\n I am an automated robot and I'm here to help you get familar with Yahoo! Messenger. Type some text in the window below and click 'SEND' to talk to me.

    junkgreg: Wow, you're sicker than I thought; repeating identical statements right after one another now. That bug you've caught seems to be getting worse. Someone help the YahooHelper!

    YahooHelper: Hi there junkgreg! How are you doing?\n I am an automated robot and I'm here to help you get familar with Yahoo! Messenger. Type some text in the window below and click 'SEND' to talk to me.

    junkgreg: Don't despair though, I'm sure you'll get help. And your suffering has meaning-- it's been teaching me. Through your illness, you've helped me to come to grips with my humanity, thinking about this halting problem. Perhaps our real advantage as humans is that we know when to quit. Something I'm going to do right now. Bye!

    { Close Instant Messenger window }