Slashdot Mirror
What Is The Best Portable MP3 Player?
0rthanc asks: "Seeing all of this controversy over MP3s has left me with an urge to finally go out and buy one of these portable MP3 players. After looking around I saw a few good looking ones by Diamond and Creative Labs, however, since the Slashdot community always knows best, what MP3 player do you all suggest? "
What a load of crap.
MP3 are about the same quality as CD
(There is a small lost of quality which is why I encode at 160bit, but headphones and most speakers downgrade the quality much more an the compression)
They do this by cutting out sound you can't hear, and compressing the rest.
Pyite statement is as stupid as saying that zipping data means you lose data!
Glynn
NONE OF THEM.
All the portable mp3 players I've seen have been 32mb standard, usually with a 64mb upgrade doubling the cost of the unit. Where's the storage?
From all the stats I've seen (and I *KNOW* you guys are going to correct me) this only works out as storing 1 album. I'm not being pesimistic, I actually want one, but I'm not shelling out for something that's not going to play more music than an old cassette walkman. Cost versus functions.
Laptops are getting smaller, palmtops are getting cooler, it makes more sense to buy one of these and a cheap set of 'phones.
Now if most mp3 players were around 250mb, and the same price region... then they'd shift a few more, and we might be able to scrap the old cassette technology for good.
(dismounting my soapbox now)
insignificant sig
My aforementioned solution to the whole MP3 issue: the upcoming Visor Springboard module MP3 player. I just got a Visor Pro (the blue one, if you care) and i'm loving it already. There is an MP3 player being released for it this summer, i have my name on the mailinglist already for more info... What's so special about it? Two things.
1.) It uses "MMC" memory cards, not the crappy "smartmedia" that all of the Rios and their breathren use.
2.) it has NO builtin memory, but has TWO card slots.
What's good about these things? The BIGGEST good point - MMC cards come in 64 MB size. Now onto point number two. Think. 64+64 == 128 Mbytes of MP3 storage. THE LARGEST SOLID STATE SIZE ON THE MARKET, at this moment. Plus, because BOTH cards are removable, if/when a 128mb module comes out, you can stick in two of those, instead of being stuck with a base 64mb and only having the versatility of ONE addon.
The thing runs off of the batteries on the Visor, but also has a plug for an external adaptor. Est. retail price for a memory-less model: $100.
They say a 64 meg version should go for $225.
STILL cheaper than a 64 meg Rio500, and WOW, it uses USB to load (right through your handspring)... you can play the audio while using the visor too, the player has all its own DSPs and stuff, just uses the visor for batteries and (if you want) display of ID3 tags.
Yes, i have linkage. Right here. Check Innogear's "MiniJam" out.
If you found this informative, well, MODERATE it!
From a motherboard manual, error beep codes: S-L-L-L-SS: Speaker Error
I like the RCA Lyra Player. It uses the sandisk smart memory cards so i can put about 5 cd's worth of music on a couple of cards. As far as Sound Quality, unless you have the audio sensitivity of a bat, you won't notice and change as to CD quality. (192K/sec 44.1KHz) I've even managed to drop the quality down to 64k/sec and when plugged into a car tape deck notice no sound degregation. On top of that I can use the memory cards in my camera. The only drawback is taht it seems as if you have to use the RCA card reader and Real Jukebox to save songs tothe player. And they change the format ofthe song to .mpx so it can only be played on a Lyra.
Don't buy any of these silly little devices. Let's examine why. A) They're expensive B) They hold barely anything C) Who can stand the horrible quality of mp3 anyway? Examine this from a logical standpoint. By conventional audio storage on CD, 32MB will get you a little over 3 minutes of audio. Why? Because this is the amount needed to capture 16 bit sound at 44.1KHz samples a second! 9/10 of the music data is being cut out when you go to mp3. They sound all washed out because of this. Stay with CD. And if you dont like skipping of CDs, get a 40 second skip protector CD player. And if you still intend on shaking it for 40 seconds, get a casette player. That's right. The somewhat ancient technology has much better quality than mp3s. Stop being so trendy and go with what's best.
"Nature doesn't care how smart you are. You can still be wrong." - Richard Feynman
I prefer MiniDiscs personally because storage is cheap and they work through many different kinds of recorders (computer, handheld, big thing for next to the reciever). I have no idea about if the computer recorder works under unix be it would be an interesting hack. Overall I think that since they can play MP3s along with other types of media that they are much more flexible and a better investment overall.