Slashdot Mirror


Censorship In China

An Anonymous Coward writes: "Have a look at this Businessweek article: a site was partly censored for 15 days because of a post uncomfortable to the Chinese government, and this Mercury Center article that proposes a more global view of the China/Taiwan issue. Surprisingly, both articles suggest that things are going better and better." Very topical; the U.S. vote on permanent normalized trade relations is scheduled for today.

12 of 272 comments (clear)

  1. The US does NOT have the largest military... by SvnLyrBrto · · Score: 4

    >I don't think Cuba poses much of a threat to the
    >country with the largest military in the world

    The US does NOT have the largest military in the world.

    Know who does? China!

    I don't have current numbers, but as of Desert Storm, the US was not even in the top five. There was a big stink about how we were facing the "mother of all wars" against Iraq, which, at the time, and the fourth largest military in the world.

    At the time we were number seven. Ahead of Iraq was china, Russia, and vietnam. Desert Storm prolly bumped Iraq out of the picture and upped us to number six.

    But then, we've done nothing but cut back the military ever since Desert Storm, so I really doubt that we're still that high. And we certianly do NOT have the largest military in the world. That dubious honor still goes to china.

    john

    --
    Imagine all the people...
  2. Re:Difference by Sloppy · · Score: 4

    In the US? Being shut down by either requires due process of law, or at the very least getting on Janet Reno's bad side.

    If intimidation (sending a threatening letter with the understanding that you can outspend the victim in courts) counts as "due process of law", then I'm not surprised that no one is able to respect the law anymore.

    Any American who still finds comfort in the fact that he can't be attacked without "due process" is deluding himself. Is there any connection remaining between the process and justice? All that seperates us from the Chinese are a few words on a page that no one takes seriously anymore anyway.


    ---
    --
    As copyright owner of this comment, I authorize everyone to defeat any technological measure which limits access to it.
  3. Difference by Ed+Avis · · Score: 4

    So what's the difference between a web site being shut down because it carried information the government didn't like, and being shut down because it carried information some large company didn't like?

    --
    -- Ed Avis ed@membled.com
    1. Re:Difference by mcc · · Score: 5

      the difference is that with the chineese government getting pissed off at it, CFInet loses $1800 and 15 days of revenue. Quick but painful slap on the wrist, and the whole thing is more or less over 15 days later, however long the damage to the psychological state of the employees lasts.

      if it had been an american corporation pissed off at a small american website, meanwhile, it would be a lot more drawn out. The small website would have had to deal with either a crippling "settlement", or legal bills costing thousands and thousands of dollars stretching years into the future with no determinate end to the hassle, except that it will more than likely end with the small website running out of money to pay for the legal bills because the corporation is doing nothing but stall tactics for the sole purpose of making the small website run out of money to pay for the legal bills, finally giving up and entering a crippling "settlement", and probably quietly going out of business a month later.

      On the other hand, there's a good chance the people running the small american website would become instant celebrities, getting posted on Slashdot [meaning they get some pretty huge exposure from the whole thing, and probably a lot of banner ad hits as they get slashdotted]. If they get lucky, they may even get an offer to have the legal bills handled by the ACLU, and if they get really really lucky (or if the small website is really impressive and the large corporation is really hypocritical) they may even get a benefit album or hundreds of people mirroring their information.
      At any rate, unless the small american website slips underneath everyone's radar (which does happen, a LOT, and in which case the small website is simply fucked over) the information the corporation doesn't want to let out will get a LOT of attention that it wouldn't have gotten otherwise.

      Meanwhile in China if you say something to piss off the government you have nothing protecting you. No one will help you, no one will organize massive campaigns in your name, slashdot will not notice your existence unless there is some kind of major vote in the american congress that day or your company uses linux or something, and you will simply become another victim of the government very, very quietly, with no outcry or notice because, hey, these things happen every day, no one is paying attention, and what's the use of protest anyway? it's not like you're going to change anything.

      You decide who's better off.

  4. I have a question for Americans.. by ReadbackMonkey · · Score: 5

    who think trading with China is a *good thing*.

    How can you justify trading with a Chinese Communist government, still unapologetic about human rights violations (i.e. Tienemen Square), when you won't trade with Fidel Castro's Communist Cuba for the same reason?

    I know this sounds very argumentative, but if money and market size is truly your motivation, then why no lift those same embargoes against Cuba? Standing on moral ground until the market is large enough just looks very hypocritical.

    1. Re:I have a question for Americans.. by molog · · Score: 4
      You are right. If trade is being opened up with China then we should drop all trade barriers we have against any country out there including Cuba. I might be the minority here but I think that free trade might be a good thing. Let's face it, our capitalist society works(sorta) because people are greedy. Give some money to the Chinese people and hopefully they will show their greed as well. Greed is one of the most powerful motivators in the world and it could be enough to change the government. The question is would that be a good change? From what I see in the US, maybe not.
      Molog

      So Linus, what are we doing tonight?

      --
      So Linus, what are we going to do tonight?
      The same thing we do every night Tux. Try to take over the world!
  5. Is anyone really surprised? by mizhi · · Score: 4
    Really, this is the same country that little over ten years ago rolled tanks into Tiananmen square. And for my friends who were living in Beijing at the time, the suppression of the event was such that most had not seen the video and pictures most Americans have seen for the past decade. Ofcourse, seeing the actual tanks roll right not more than 10 from the front door has got to scare the shit out of anyone.

    While I agree that China has made significant progress in the past 10 years, we still have to remember we are dealing with a country whose government is ideologically opposed to the United States.

    On the plus side, China is going about with their reform in a very positive way. Unlike Russia, China is slowly moving towards a more capitalistic society... but sometimes I wonder if it's at the expense of it's citizens.

    Ofcourse, if you look at recent events in the US in regards to the WTO meetings and the way the protestors were handled... perhaps we're not much different than China... and maybe we deserve eachother.

    On an interesting note, it appears the the FBI considers TAIWAN a priority in counter-intelligence activities, and a hostile intelligence threat to the United States. Reno calls Taiwan an intelligence threat

    --
    Humorless sig goes here.
  6. Re:China by Midnight+Ryder · · Score: 5

    China is... interesting. I spent 4 1/2 months there doing work on a feed mill in Langfang, PRC. (About 2 hours out of Bejing) Being very used to America, going to China was a real eye-opener. Porn? Forget it - it exists, but it's pretty rare. Don't even think about throwing a couple of playboys in your luggage and taking them with you either. (I didn't try it myself.)

    Bibles? Forget it. A guy I knew would take a couple with him - but definitely not more than two or three. He was very religious, and didn't typically try and 'convert' the locals, but took some in case anyone was interested in reading about the Christian concepts. If they think you are planning on distributing religious materials, you can find yourself in hot-water quickly.

    Don't talk bad about the govornment there. While here in the US there was always the half-joking concept of a 'card carrying communist' it's not much of a joke there. You won't know who is or isn't communist there, unless they pull out thier little red party book. And, talkin' bad about the Chineese govorment is a good way of attracting lots of unwanted attention.

    There's lots of things not to take pictures of there. Don't have your pics developed in China - wait until you get home. I learned that one - some of the film I had developed never came back from the photo-developer there in China. I still have no idea what was objectionable in them...

    It boils down to: No discussion on govornment. No discussion on religion. No discussion on sex. That's pretty much the rules I learned while I was there.

    One other thing of note that's just completely strange to an American - here we are used to hearing what happens everywhere else in the world, and particularly, all the other sections of our own country. In China, it's much, MUCH slower for information to get around - most of it is still word of mouth the last time I was there. Newspapers and TV are a joke, as only 'approved' stuff get through.

    Granted - this was also 4 years ago that I was there. Things may well have changed by now.

    --

    Davis Ray Sickmon, Jr - looking for something to read? Check out my three free novels at MidnightRyder.org

  7. And in related news.... by haggar · · Score: 4

    Chi na bans Taiwan's Madonna

    Beijing has banned one of Taiwan's top pop
    stars after she sang the island's national
    anthem at last Saturday's inauguration of
    President Chen Shui-bian.

    A-Mei, who is wildly popular on the mainland,
    has been permanently blacklisted in China,
    officials said.

    US soft drinks giant
    Coca-Cola has been
    forced to drop a
    multi-million dollar
    advertising campaign in
    China featuring A-Mei.

    --
    Sigged!
  8. Censorship in China by A+Big+Gnu+Thrush · · Score: 4

    future headlines:

    Vanity in Hollywood!
    Pot in Amsterdam!
    Greed on Wall Street!
    Mounties in Canada!

    /. : News for Shut-ins. Stuff that's obvious.

  9. Glass houses by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4

    Hmmm, let's see: In Miami, many Cuban performers cannot perform at local theatres because of the outrage from the Cuban-exile community. I was spat upon when trying to catch a piano recital from a person who had once visited Cuba. Art studios locally have banned Cuban artists. Some have protested Borges in school libraries. Some have said that the difference here is that in China censorship is government approved and in Miami not so. Nope. The politicians here look the other way.
    As a person with Hispanic and Asian roots it is doubly difficult to condemn other countries when ideals of freedom, the basis for the Constitution, are being trampled locally.
    Even something as simple and innocent as a nude photograph can be prohibited here. Because of a vocal minority, a black & white nude photograph was censored from a local high school art show. Not long ago, a nude, non-erotic sculpture was also censored. Though I respect the right of a school administrator to maintain order, at what point is it crossing the line to some nightmarish Orwellian vision?
    As much as I despise censorship, it is somewhat disingenuous to decry foreign violations when we (at least in Miami) are as guilty.

  10. U.S. Embargoed Countries by circuskid · · Score: 4

    If anyone cares, here is a list of countries currently under embargo by the U.S.:

    Albania, Armenia, Azerbaijan, Belarus, Bulgaria, Cambodia, China (PRC), Cuba, Estonia, Georgia, Iran, Iraq, Kyrgyzstan, Laos, Latvia, Libya, Lithuania, Macao (Macau), Moldova, North Korea, Romania, Russia, Syria, Sudan, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, Yugoslavia (Serbia), Ukraine, Uzbekistan, Vietnam

    --
    sig this