Slashdot Mirror


Linux Mandrake 7.1 Reviewed

webword writes: "The Duke of URL has posted a pretty good review of Mandrake 7.1. There is a useful list of pros and cons, along with performance and usaability ratings. There are some helpful screenshots too." BeOpen submitted a link to a 7.1 review on gnulinux.com, Sensei^ one on linuxnewbie.org, and Quick & Flupke serendipitously pointed out the new slash-like Mandrake Forum where users can (among other things) suggest features for upcoming Mandrake releases.

19 of 76 comments (clear)

  1. Incomplete... by Lion-O · · Score: 3
    I'll make no secret about it; I don't like MD at all. However; despite this opinion I did read up on the article being as open minded as possible. After all; its stupid saying that you feel something isn't that great and repeating that over and over while closing your eyes for any improvement.

    Anyway; why on earth does the article only cover the X interface ? Sure its nice to know that MD, before unknown to me, did contribute something and developed stuff like their own configuration tools. But there is way more to Linux then that, and those topics were left out the article IMHO:

    Which directory structure does MD use? Still the 1 on 1 copy of RedHat or did they improve it?

    Are those configuration tools 'exportable'. i.o.w.; is this something totally focused on MD itself or can users of other distro's take advantage of it as well? (if this isn't the case I would have to retract my earlier remark on contributing)

    Are those configuration tools also available on the commandline? A lot of people seem to forget that you really do not need a cpu hog as X when you use Linux as a server.

    Last but not least; any special improvements made to RPM ? For example; some script to automate kernel compiles ?

    I know, perhaps I'm to much demanding but the article does make it very clear that some distro's completely seem to focus on end-users while there are but a few who also keep the "real" functionality of Linux in mind.

    1. Re:Incomplete... by deno · · Score: 3

      Well, one of the beauties of a Linux is that everyone is free to choose whatever suits him the best. Mandrake (i work for Mandrakesoft now) focuses on "making the system easier to use", and the most visible component is fine-tuning the GUI - that is why press releases usually concentrate on GUI stuff.

      However, Mandrake system is not "dumbass distro", it is rather a heavy-duty in disguise. Do not judge on appearance- try it first, comment later.

      As for "our" tools, they are all GPL-ed, and at least some of them would work on any other distro (or at least on RH) withouth any changes. Some of them work only on X, other have both X and comandline interfaces. Some of the tools have already evolved into comunity projects already, other have not, but we are very open for any kind of cooperation.

      FYI, here is our official policy for the future: All the config-tools should work in both text and graphical mode. Having "http" and "non-interactive" (for scripts) mode would be nice too.

    2. Re:Incomplete... by be-fan · · Score: 2

      You're comments are pretty irrelevant. The reviewer says that he is talking about installes for less advanced systems, so yes, X is the only one that matters. You're probably not going to run Mandrake on a server. Second, the directory structure is the same. It has to be since the crappy RPM format has poor provisions for custom directory structures. The tools might be exportable, but seriously, does anybody care? Stuff like that isn't (and shouldn't) be included in a review. Most of the stuff you say (aside from the command line config tool) are pretty much irrelevant to a review. In fact, including it would be bad writing style. As for your comments about end users and "real" functionality, do I detect a sysadmin bias? 99% of the time, Mandrake users are going to be the end user. Thus the end user focus on the review. You don't balk when reviewers ignore server setup in Corel Linux, so why balk for Mandrake?

      --
      A deep unwavering belief is a sure sign you're missing something...
    3. Re:Incomplete... by Lion-O · · Score: 2
      focuses on "making the system easier to use", and the most visible component is fine-tuning the GUI - that is why press releases usually concentrate on GUI stuff. However, Mandrake system is not "dumbass distro", it is rather a heavy-duty in disguise.

      Heavy-duty it may be but then it seems even more weird to completely focus on X as the layer for the user interface when configuration is concerned. As I said before; if you are building a server you don't really need X. When you need a heavy duty server (talking cpu load here) X is out of the question at all in most cases.

      Your second point about the config tools itself didn't say anything. Its kinda obvious that those tools run on other systems. After all; basicly they are just X tools. IMHO its quite clear that I didn't mean whether or not the tools would run on other distro's but if they would work, please note the difference.

    4. Re:Incomplete... by be-fan · · Score: 2

      Sorry, my mistake. Gotta take the heat when I deserve it. Apparently Mandrake IS aimed at servers, (it says so on their webpage) I hereby retract any comments I made related to servers.

      --
      A deep unwavering belief is a sure sign you're missing something...
  2. Mandrake and qt2 by nyet · · Score: 2

    All I want to know is.... do automake/autoconf's aclocal.m4 find mdks's qt2 yet?

    If so, could somebody post a WORKING version of aclocal.m4 that works with mdk and _their_ qt2 rpm (not redhat's)?

  3. TrueType Font Installation... by Keith_Beef · · Score: 3

    Duke of URL says in his review of Mandrake 7.1:

    Here's DrakFont! ... Now you can import TrueType fonts and use them on your Linux machine. Finally, I have fonts.

    Well, I've been using Mandrake for over a year, and I'm currently at release 7.0, and I can assure you that it's not really all that hard to install TrueType fonts by hand, without needing to use the DrakFont utility.

    The proof is that a couple of nights ago, I installed all the TrueType fonts from a Bitstream 500 Font CD in a little over five minutes, from the command line.

    Admittedly, if I want to be able to use these fonts in FrameMaker 5.5.6 (Beta) for Linux, I'll need to install the PostScript equivalents (on the same CD), but I don't think that's going to be a problem ;-).

    Oh, and Applix can't use these TrueType fonts yet...

    But they show up fine in xlsfonts, xfd, the FontChooser dialogs, er, most everywhere.

  4. My own experience by mindstrm · · Score: 2

    I started using mandrake 7.1 the day after it was released. My main reason for doing this was to use Xfree864.0.. it is integrated into mandrake 7.1 (as an install option).

    I was building a 3 headed computer, you see.

    Now.. my first impression, as always, with mandrake, is the level of integration of all the GUI components. THey do a rather good job of this, and also do a good job of making sure a great many tools are available.

    Oh.. but rpmdrake won't allow me to add a remote ftp or http site.. it just exits, restarts, and nothing has changed if I try to add one... oh, and no errors anywhere, period.

    Oh.. and I tried downloading staroffice from sun, and loading it up.. but the installer just sits there and then exits after a while.. I don't know about the rest of the world, but this is a *BIG* pain in the butt for me. Without staroffice, I lose touch with all those MS Office using coworkers.

    Wine seems to have some kind of font problem.. though I'm not sure what it is...

    And perhaps it's my own ignorance, but trying to compile upgraded versions of gnome stuff, nothing ever seems to be able to find the headers or libraries where it expects to. gnome.h is nowhere to be found.

    And it has locked on occasion, though I won't attribute that to Mandrake until I spend some more quality time with it.

    And why doesn't it understand the wheelie on my mouse using xfree864.0? It *said* on the site that it did, for almost all apps.. but it sure doesn't.

    All in all.. I think they did a great job of integrating things.. but have gone a bit too far and actually broken some key elements.

  5. Re:floppy disk problems? by mindstrm · · Score: 2

    Perhaps you need to read the 'how to make a bootdisk' document. There is nothing at all wrong.. and all linux boot disks are exactly 1440k.
    1440k is how much a floppy holds.

  6. A tale of two systems; Mandrake 7.1 Rocks! by Chyeburashka · · Score: 5
    I downloaded the ISO images last week and installed 7.1 on the following two systems:
    • A Dell 420 dual 733 P-III at work.
    • A Gateway 450 P-III at home.

    The first thing I noticed is the Bogomips values reported at boot time are doubled for both machines over previous distributions, including Mandrake 7.0, Caldera 2.2 and 2.3 and RedHat 6.0 and 6.1.

    My Dell box at work is no longer the strong but silent type; the sound card worked on the first boot up. With previous distibutions and also on an older Dell Gxi, it was always an annoying exercise to get sound working. I never had any trouble with the sound on the Gateway.

    My main reason for installing 7.1 was to try the ReiserFS. I've set up both systems with ReiserFS on all partitions. I decided to give the ReiserFS a good test and after umounting the filesystems on a separate and still ext2 disk, I just pulled the plug and rebooted. It was the fasted reboot after a power outage that I've ever seen. Reiser took 18 seconds to do its thing on a 17 MB IDE disk, and then the system came up just perfectly.

    I really like the new, improved menu system. So far, this is the best distribution I've used, and my Linux experience goes back to kernel 0.99 on Slackware.

    This has undoubtably been mentioned elsewhere, but if you want to get Xfree86 4.0, you have to do the expert install.

    Also, I usually make a separate /boot partition of about 20 MB, but when I tried to format it using ReiserFS, I got an error. I gave up and just made separate /, /usr, /var, and /home partitions of appropriate sizes and everthing worked fine. I made all these partitions ReiserFS. Does anyone have any suggestions about what an optimal setup might be? Could some partitions better be left ext2?

    A brute force and sometimes quicker way of doing an upgrade is just to install over the old system, saving the /home directory by not formatting it and carefully saving other files you tweaked elsewhere. I planned on saving the log files in /var/log by not formatting /var. Well, the installer wouldn't let me get away with not formatting /var. Next time, I'll save my logs elsewhere.

  7. My experience... by Malc · · Score: 4

    Things I like:
    1) They show where you are in the process of installing, much like one of those wizards in Power Point. It also makes it very easy to jump to another part of the install.

    2) It ships with Roaring Penguin PPPoE client. Yes, I'm one of those unfortunate Sympatico HSE people who are forced to use this dreadful protocol with their DSL. It would be nice to see one of these distros coming with a kernel rather than user based PPPoE client.

    Problems I had:
    1) Disk tool/partitoner - it told me /dev/hdb was too corrupt. There's nothing wrong with it! I just got a new hard drive, which is /dev/hda. I installed Win2K Pro, Win2k Adv Svr and Mandrake 6.1 a few weeks ago. Mandrake 6.1 has no problems with either hard drive. It even added entries for various partitions on /dev/hdb in to /etc/fstab. I can probably install into a partition on /dev/hda, but I would rather I didn't have to use this tool...

    I didn't change anything on /dev/hda, and it wanted to save things... rather worrisome: I'm not sure what it was trying to save. I guess I was concerned that it wanted to modify the partition table, but it didn't say. I don't want the partition table changed.

    2) It took ages to install (upgrade), and the time estimate/taken was way off. It predicted that it would take about 15 mins... 3 hours later it was still saying 7 mins to go. I had a look in one of the other consoles and it seemed to be doing a lot of opening of the RPM database followed by about 15 transactions for each set of packages.

    3) Selecting the Roaring Penguin stuff in one part of the install didn't automatically select the other part that I needed. Maybe this would have been detected later in the install, but I didn't get there due to it being so slow, and the thunderstorm that spiked the power.

  8. Oops, errata for my previous post. by Chyeburashka · · Score: 2
    While waiting for Slashdot to start responding again, I messed up the last paragraph of my previous comment. And then, I didn't look closely enough at the preview. The lost sentence is in italics.

    The last paragraph should have read:

    A brute force and sometimes quicker way of doing an upgrade is just to install over the old system, saving the /home directory by not formatting it and carefully saving other files you tweaked elsewhere. When I upgraded from Caldera 2.3 to Mandrake 7.0, I decided on this approach. I planned on saving the log files in /var/log by not formatting /var. Well, the 7.0 installer wouldn't let me get away with not formatting /var. Next time, I'll save my logs elsewhere.

  9. Re:A little too frothing, methinks by drivers · · Score: 2

    I picked up a 10/100 card from SMC for about $15.00 (and it came with a cable and a bundled copy of turbolinux, heh) (man that card is sweet, it's about the size of a DIMM) but I couldn't get it working with my copy of Mandrake, mostly because I didn't know what module/irq/address to select in linuxconf. But then I ran Lothar and it set everything up for me automatically. Lothar is very cool.

  10. Re:MD 7.1 Install Problems by be-fan · · Score: 2

    No it does not. I booted of the cd and ran the mandrake installer. I don't think the red hat installer is even included? Or are you talking about the text mode installer. In that case, get a new video card.

    --
    A deep unwavering belief is a sure sign you're missing something...
  11. A little too frothing, methinks by Junks+Jerzey · · Score: 4

    From the review:

    Mandrake has once again innovated in every sense.

    Apparently a nice and stable Linux distribution is innovation. Hmmm...maybe I agree with that.

  12. Finally about to switch, and a question... by Vladinator · · Score: 3

    I have to admit, this is the first time since 1994 that I have been considering dumping Slackware very seriously... Does anyone know where we can get the other two disks the install script mentions? I have the first two from the ISO image - I will NOT buy a boxed set if it's the only way to get the other two disks - I'll just wait for Slack 7.1 "any day now".

    Fawking Trolls!

    --

    "Going to war without France is like going deer hunting without your accordion." - Jed Babbin

  13. Partition Magic? by jelwell · · Score: 4

    I really like the option to let Mandrake decide how the partitioning should be done - including resizing your windows partition (something like fips?). I have problems deciding how much space to allocate all the time - and I've been using linux for years. Just the other day I tried installing (Redhat) linux on my g/f machine and didn't allocate enough space for /usr for the installation to work! I said "fuck it" and went with one big honking "/" partition. I know why I shouldn't do that - but I also know it'll work for now - and it's bad enough that I had to consider partitioning in the first place. Finally someone gets it: The hardest part about linux is installing it. (which has been getting better and better really fast recently with the advent of GUI installers)

    I also really like GRUB. I'll have to find a URL for that - say goodbye to lilo, and hello to GRUB - It's like the dosGUI version of lilo. :)

    Anyways, cheers to the Mandrake people.
    Joseph Elwell.

  14. What's New In Mandrake 7.1 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4
    • i810 based video cards now supported
    • Wheel mouse is now fully functionnal with most applications (netscape, gnome, KDE, etc.)
    • Better powersaving support on Laptop computers
    • Enhanced USB support for modems, printers, Zip drives
    • Better symmetrical multi processing support
    • All Helix Code GNOME improvements incorporated
    • Enhanced default settings for GNOME & KDE environments
    • Modified Qt library (foundation of KDE applications) supporting Chinese, Korean, Japanese
    • New menu system. Menus look now the same under every graphical environments and updates automatically when new packages are installed.
    • System organization benefits from reordered packages in coherent groups, usable by most package-management tools, including RpmDrake.
    • DrakBoot allows for easy graphical configuration of boot loader (lilo and grub)
    • DrakBootdisk, a new graphical boot-floppy creation tool.
    • PrinterDrake (printer configuration) now supports more printer types and options.
    • DrakX now fully handles multiple-CD installation.
    • Linux4Win now runs automatically when CDROM is inserted under Windows (autorun)
    • DrakX user interface has been improved to ease installation : User can now choose an icon representing his/her user under Linux-Mandrake, more powerfull packages selection options, etc.
    • Installation can now detect high resolution video modes and use them during install
    • Urpmi, the text-mode rpm tool now handles local rpm installation.
    • If Windows is present on the computer, DrakFont gives the user access to his Windows fonts under Linux.
    • Distribution is now shipped with a fully functionnal rescue floppy.
    • Grub is now supported as the default bootloader, no more 1024-cylinder limit.
    • Now includes brand new XFree 4.0 servers, with new modular architecture.
    • For professional environments, the new journalized file system ReiserFS is included
    • Main distribution is now on 2 CDROMs, the second one also including contribs.
    • Koffice and QT2 beta now available in contribs.
    • GnuCash, personal finance manager, now included. hehe I stole that from someone elses post!
  15. I just put it on a laptop... by geekd · · Score: 3

    and it rocks.

    I have been using Mandrake since 5.1, and this is the best yet. They really got everything organized well in the default KDE setup, integrating all the apps together, instead of putting the gnome apps in the "red hat" menu.

    It recognized my pcmcia cards out of the box. I can even switch from my Aironet wireless LAN card (at work) to my 3Com 10/100 LAN card (at home) without a re-boot or anything, just re-starting network.

    The "K -> Configuration -> hardware -> laptop settings" (kcmlaptop) is way cool and very usefull.

    Eterm is (finally) included in the default install.

    AbiWord "preview" version is included, and it's pretty cool. I was just messing with it a bit last night (I mostly use xemacs for any type of text stuff) and it worked great.

    IBM thinkpad 240, btw, and it was just as easy as a standard desktop install.

    enjoy,
    geekd