Tivo Hacking A-OK - Says Tivo
s|eeper writes: "C|Net just posted an article about Tivo publicly stating that at this time, they have no problem with people hacking their Tivos to add more disk space."
← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)
Why would Tivo care anyway? Tivo makes their money on the subscriptions service and selling placement on their entertainment guide. As long as people don't expect tech support from Tivo for their modified boxes, Tivo probably would even encourage this sort of thing..
Now Phillips and Sony may not care for this too much...
DrLunch.com The site that tells you what's for lunch!
Doubtful, since Tivo doesn't actually sell the boxes...
DrLunch.com The site that tells you what's for lunch!
REALLY?! A cron job and a TV card give me what TiVo has? I get updated TV listings? I can put in my preferences and have it record things I might like? I get the great user interface?! AMAZING! Try again.
"I once met a subliminal advertising executive, but only for a second."
Lawrence Person (lawrencepersonh@gmailh.com (remove all "h"s to mail)
http://www.lawrenceperson.com/
Advertising is already changing.
:p
I wish I had the link, but here's what happened during the World Series:
Those banners on the wall weren't really there, or if they were there, they were different than what you say. They had a realtime substitution of other banners.
Basically what you think you're seeing on television ISN'T what you're seeing. And it's there, in the show, so yea..
Pretty subliminal to me, but I don't watch television, unless it's Blue's Clues with my son.
Same thing with Friends - they had an episode where a thing of Oreos sat on the counter - they weren't there during filming, they were added post process.
-- Talonius
My reality check bounced.
God, please tell me I'm not the only person in the world that remembers this...blipverts!
Remember the pilot episode of Max Headroom? Where they were testing out these little ultra-compressed two-second or so commercials they called "blipverts?" They worked, but they had a minor unpleasant side effect...namely, causing people to randomly explode.
But then again, I think that if I see another damned Old Navy commercial, my brain will explode anyway, so I doubt anyone would notice the difference. ^_^
This is a Chao. A Chao says "Mu."
Perhaps they will force the manufacturers to put in code that, upon hitting a commercial break, diables any fast-forwarding until the commercial break is over. This would be relatively easy to do if commercial codes were somehow encoded somewhere in an unused portion of the video signal.
I suppose this isn't impossible, if the "this is a commercial" signal were put in the vertical retrace area along with closed captioning and stuff, but then it would be easier for people to make VCRs that pause when they see that signal!
On the other hand, if they stuck in the signal for random 30 second intervals in the middle of TV shows, then the equipment would have to think twice about pausing recording. But that would only be a problem with tape-based systems. A disc-based system like Tivo can just back up when it detects a "commercial" of more than 2 minutes. Or it could let you decide for yourself (after all, humans are very good at deciding what is and is not a commercial) and use a "30 second skip" button. Which is what it does.
--
"Open source is good." - Steve Jobs
"Open source is evil." - Microsoft
_/_
/ v \
(IIGS( Scott Alfter (remove Voyager's hull # to send mail)
\_^_/
20 January 2017: the End of an Error.
It seems like if they allow people to add HD space at their own discretion, this stands as yet another selling point for this product. Considering this, I wonder...
:)
If TIVO, and products like it, become more and more popular, will the very nature of advertising on television change as a result?
My friend owns one of those TIVO thingies, and it seems like he never watches any commercials at all... he just pre-records all his favorate shows, and then zips thru the ads with the 30 second-skip button. If it gets to the point where most viewers are using a service that allows them to do this, how will the networks change the format of ads in order to compensate? Will they place them during the shows themselves, or in the form of product placement?
Or will they simply revert to subliminal mind control techniques?
But there are some problems that I see right off the bat that need correcting - and they can be. But are they already?
The main problem, as I see it, is where to get the program information. There are places like Click TV that give really good program guides, but I would think the commercial outfits would get mighty pissed if I wrote something that repackaged their program guide. Is there a open TV listing system, like the Free CDDB is to CDDB?
Is it just me, or did C-Net build this story around a quote and an inference from a single Tivo representative (Rebecca Baer)?
:)
I'm glad Mr. Hill has no problem with people hacking Tivos, but he isn't a Tivo rep.
So.. Is there a better source on Tivo's perspective on the matter? After all, recent C-Net stories haven't exactly been fountains of indisputable and reliable information...
In the UK on two of our channels (itv and channel4) we have what are called cue dots in the corner of the screen which indicate that adverts are about to start... this could perhaps be used to chop adverts out all together.
:)
The other factor you could use to acknowledge advertising is that it is generally slightly louder than the original program. It will also usually have a higher range of frequencies since high frequencies carry more energy - making you pay more attention to the add (supposibly
I think a closer parallel would be:
You buy a Ford, rip out the engine and replace it with a Studebaker engine with more HP. A few months later, something goes wrong so you return to the shop expecting a warrantee repair. The mechanic's a nice guy and a bit of a Studebaker hacker, so he fixes it anyhow (or maybe he tries and fails), but you posted how to replace the engine on the net and now there's a line of 50 Fords with Studebaker engines all suffering some problem hoping for a repair. This mean's Ford has several options:
-Agree to fix Studebaker engines, which means working a deal with Studebaker for parts (which wont be nearly as cheap as Ford parts) and sending all the mechanics to Studebaker school. Not cheap in the short run, not cheap in the long run.
-Ignore these customers and state "We don't fix modified Fords" to stop people sending modified units back, incurring the wrath of the customer base.
-Accept modified units but charge out-of-warrantee repair fees. This works fine until someone puts a Mazda turbo on the Studebaker engine and posts results to the net. Suddenly, Ford has to send all mechanics to Studebaker AND Mazda school (and narrows hiring choices to mechanics who know Ford, Studebaker, and Mazda, which are very scarce in Silicon Valley and want premium cash & stock options) and negotiate parts deals with Mazda. This becomes a never-ending cycle and results in high repair fees and Ford spending a lot more energy on repairs and a lot less on making new cars (which again incurs the wrath of the customer base because Ford "isn't spending enough energy innovating").
Or worse yet, Ford comes out with a free chip upgrade that adds tons of HP and drives fuel economy down more than any upgrade that the hackers have been doing, but doesn't work with the now-wimpy Studebaker engines, so now everyone is in a huff because Ford's not supporting the innovators (or as most customers will say "screwing over the hackers") and they're left with weaker machines than if they'd just left the hood down in the first place.
Geek hacks TiVo, adds features, makes it better, makes it GPL. TiVo likes mods, adds them to next version, everybody benefits. I'm waiting for my RAIDed, mp3 playing, networkable, quake playing TiVo. Seeya WebTV!
I am glad to see that some people are willing to be reasonable. It is true that those who decide to experiment and tinker with the world around them, can indeed live in harmony with those who choose not to.
Let's hope that this attitude continues when someone finds away to store their now decrypted DVD files [thanks to DeCSS] on their modified TIVO box [with the extra 80Gig IDE hard drive].
Isn't technology great?
all persons, living and dead, are purely coincidental. - Kurt Vonnegut
When I tried to do a search to find out about TiVo on MSNBC, I got these results.
AOL's epic aim: to slay Microsoft
http://www.msnbc.com/news/280218.asp
The golden fleece that America Online, Sun Microsystems and Netscape are chasing is nothing less than developing the dominant computing platform -- one that makes Microsoft's Windows irrelevant.
Harvard, MIT fight Microsoft over research about Netscape
http://www.msnbc.com/news/200480.asp
Harvard and Massachusetts Institute of Technology are fighting a demand from Microsoft for two professors' research on Netscape. Separately, Microsoft released some evidence it will use in the antitrust case, revealing a likely legal strategy.
Microsoft says it violated no antitrust laws
http://www.msnbc.com/news/359094.asp
Microsoft on Tuesday said that despite a court's finding that it holds monopoly power, the evidence presented against it during the government's antitrust case doesn't add up to illegal behavior. By Brock N. Meeks
Microsoft hopes to use book to show it won browser battle fairly
http://www.msnbc.com/news/204337.asp
A forthcoming book by a couple of literary unknowns is about to get extraordinary publicity in the Microsoft Corp. antitrust trial
How pathetic is this, that they're obviously trying to put pro-MS articles in non relevant search results? ughhh I can't find anything on the web without getting a dick full of prop-o-ganda!
Help me through college please!
It's annoying when posters don't read the story, but when slashdot editors don't, it's just sad.
sig:
sig:
See the "..for smart people" banners Wired runs here? Look elsewhere guys.
More to the point: if a company rents out equipment with GPL-modified equipment (rather than sells it), would they need to release the code modifications?
Yes, read the GPL, it says it in plain black and white that if you distribute GPL derrived works you must also offer source. Renting is a form of distribution for a set amount of time.
-- iCEBaLM
Maybe I am not a big enough geek, but I don't see why this is /. worthy. Assume for the moment that TiVo did have an anti-hacking rule... ok, don't buy TiVos... there's no reason to buy one and then bitch about it. Oh well....
I could not justify my existence if I were a turkey farmer. Would I terminate myself? Undoubtably, yes.
The download format of TiVo's guide data download is not open. It is proprietary. If someone were to crack this and start offering a competing server for TiVo's existing clients, TiVo would surely respond with increased security; subscription revenue is the only way they get a return on writing the client software.
In the US, programs usually start on time, although there are notable exceptions. Version 2.0 of the TiVo software will allow you to specify an automatic pre and post padding to recordings of programs, i.e. always start recording X-Files one minute early and end one minute late.
The networks don't give TiVo any information about advertisements, but TiVo really doesn't need this information. It records the ads and then allows you to fast-forward through them at up to 60x. When you exit FF, it does an automatic skip-back to compensate for your reaction time, usually leaving you within a few seconds of where you wanted to be.
Stripping ads automatically poses two problems. (1) Ad stripping isn't 100% accurate, so you'd likely miss some of your program; (2) the networks would sue them.
/jab
Moderator - TiVo Community Help Center at http://www.tivocommunity.com
Buy a TiVo, you are paying your own money... you decide to tinker with it... why would the TiVo folks have any say in the matter? Don't you buy a TiVo? You aren't renting it, correct? I don't see why TiVo would have any stance on this. It would be like Ford saying, "We don't have any problem with people changing their own oil filters." That being said, why again is this news?
I could not justify my existence if I were a turkey farmer. Would I terminate myself? Undoubtably, yes.
Isn't it somewhat disheartening that a company has to come out and publicly give their blessing for people to tinker with what they own? Yes, I know Tivo couldn't stop people from hacking up their products even if they were so inclined, but this should be implicit. If you bought it, you own it and can do whatever the hell you want to it and no company anywhere or anytime should be able to say anything about it except that you've voided the warranty.
A cursory glance at their website reveals that they distribute the source to the kernel they are running, which is modified. However the real bread-and-butter of the TiVo (their proprietary filesystem and, most importantly, their client software) is closed and will be forever and ever. You seem to be hinting at a GPL violation but if you read the GPL license more closely you'll see that they are in total compliance.
--
I think there is a world market for maybe five personal web logs.
_/_
/ v \
(IIGS( Scott Alfter (remove Voyager's hull # to send mail)
\_^_/
20 January 2017: the End of an Error.
....
....
--Hey Doctor Jones! No time for love!