Slashdot Mirror


LinuxWorld

mduell writes: "Saw these three on the Technology front page at MSNBC.com. First off, This story on how GNOME Foundation takes aim at Microsoft. Secondly, this story about what Michael Dell thinks of Linux. Lastly, this story about Linux on mobile devices." Some other links that have been submitted: a reader submits pictures from the Expo, a Linux PDA is announced, and Michael Dell tries to figure out why he's selling overpriced Linux systems.

30 of 94 comments (clear)

  1. Agenda VR3 by Tesser · · Score: 2

    ZDNet has an article about the VR3 as well.

    Among the more interesting tidbits, you can hook up to the VR3's RS232 serial port and telnet or ftp right into the PDA.

    The article also has full technical specs and a picture of the PDA in its cradle.

  2. uhm, no by Hollins · · Score: 2

    The Justice department investigated MS about five years ago because of this practice. They got MS to stop doing this, but accomplished little else to reign in the company.

  3. Re:What about PocketLinux? by jpick · · Score: 3

    Hi, I've been working for Transvirtual on the PocketLinux stuff.

    PocketLinux is a PDA operating system that we've been developing, based around Kaffe and an XML-based application framework.

    We're announcing it at LWCE, even though I already demoed a bit of it at OLS. Even at this early stage, it's probably the best PDA OS for Linux handhelds I've seen yet.

    At the show, we've been running it on the VTech Helio, and the Compaq iPaq.

    We're actually selling the Helio's for $149 at the show, but it's really for developers only at this stage.

    We've got a really wicked demo built for the iPaq, with themes, handwriting recognition, a notepad, article viewer, MP3 player, and even video! We've got a few Java games running too.

    Unfortunately, the demo really only came together at the last minute, so the web pages haven't been updated, and we haven't posted the sources and images yet.

    I'm going to try to get on that...

  4. Agenda Linux PDA by SEWilco · · Score: 3
    This was in one of the press releases, not in the FAQ. The FAQ did mention also a VR3+ with 4 MB flash and a VR5 with color screen.

    • PROCESSOR 66MHz 32-bit MIPS processor
    • MEMORY 8 MB RAM 2 MB flash storage
    • DISPLAY Large 2 1/4" x 3 1/4" viewable area
      • 160 x 240 pixel LCD screen in 16 grayscale shades
      • Backlit for dark viewing
      • Digital contrast control

    USER INTERFACE

    • Recognizes natural handwriting anywhere on the LCD screen
    • Audio input/output (external headset, phone jack, microphone and speaker)
    • Stylus activated power on/off feature
    • Touch-sensitive display for stylus or fingertip operation
    • 7 push buttons for different actions
    • 7 touch-sensitive quick-launch hard-icons
    • On-screen keyboard, supports optional external keyboard
    • Built-in mic/phone jack
    • Visual notification LED
    • Audio notification Buzzer
    • Quick Sync cradle
    • Infrared connection

    CONNECTIVITY

    • 1 IrDA port
    • 1 RS-232 port
    • 1 High-speed 1.6 MHz clocked serial port for external keyboard, mass storage, wireless, etc.

    BUILT-IN SOFTWARE Linux VR operating system Contacts, To-Do, Schedule, Notes, Calculator, Quicksync for Linux and Windows PC, Mail, Network, Terminal, Games, Bootloader, Utilities Backlit display for clear viewing in low light conditions

    ...

    PRICING AND AVAILABILITY The Agenda VR3 will be available in October 2000. Pricing for the Agenda VR3 is expected to begin as low as $149 MSRP. Product availability, pricing and product specifications are subject to change without notice.

    1. Re:Agenda Linux PDA by Thomas+Charron · · Score: 2

      At first, I quickly went to the site, to see this beast, and *OH BOY* is it underwhelming.. s 2.25x3.25" screen, but only 160x240?? Blech, and only 16 greyscales.

      And you have something wrong there. It's 8 MB *ROM*, 2 Meg flash *RAM*

      And a 'speedy' 66 MHz processor.. ;-P

      The newer palsm outperform this, with an equivilent price range. Thanks, but I'll go buy an iPaq first. (Well, as soon as they can save the CE image just in case it frags, so I don;t end up with a 500$ doorstop)

      --
      -- I'm the root of all that's evil, but you can call me cookie..
  5. "It's not Microsoft" by Bilbo · · Score: 3
    Just read a SF short story where the question was asked, "Define 'old' without using the word 'young'." Brings to mind the question:

    Define "Linux" without using the phrase, "It's not Microsoft".
    Why do I get nervous when MSNBC puts up a news article on how GNOME is positioning itself to replace Windows? Is MS working to reinforce the notion that Linux, and all the Open Source applications that come with it, are simply playing catch-up to Redmond's Thought Leadership and Innovation?

    People, Linux has got to stand on it's own. I think it's great to talk about taking over market share, and breaking the back of the oppressive monopoly that we've all been struggling under, but if we can't do anything more than mimmic the new features that Microsoft is coming out with, ours will be a short dynasty. We have to fight the temptation to think of ourselves as a "better Windows". People have to buy into Linux because it does what they need to do, quickly and reliably, with a user interface that makes sense to normal human beings.

    Break out of the mold and do something truly creative.

    --

    --
    Your Servant, B. Baggins
    1. Re:"It's not Microsoft" by IGnatius+T+Foobar · · Score: 2
      if we can't do anything more than mimmic the new features that Microsoft is coming out with,
      Although we know that this is a rash and incorrect generalization, I'll address it as if it were correct:

      What are we adding? In short, commoditization. Even if Linux were just another Windows (which it isn't), it's free. It commoditizes the operating system, just as TCP/IP commoditized wire protocol and Ethernet commoditized the wire itself. Unseating the monopoly and putting control of the operating system back into the hands of the industry and community is a worthy goal, in and of itself.

      Besides, who knows how many slick new innovations could have happened over the last decade if Microsoft hadn't been there to destroy them? We're creating a level playing field, one on which true innovation can happen, whether or not it agrees with the One Microsoft Way.
      --
      --
      Tired of FB/Google censorship? Visit UNCENSORED!
  6. Re:Agenda PDA by Tesser · · Score: 2

    From the developer's site:

    Agenda isn't a "new OS". It is Linux. The real McCoy. And it is X. And bash. And whatever else you port.

    Leverage open-source operating system and tools.
    Source-available system utilities and productivity suite software.
    Program in C or C++.
    Use familiar tools and libraries like gcc and glibc.
    Don't settle for less - the VR3 runs Linux 2.4 and XFree86.
    Build user interfaces easily using the built-in FLTK library.
    Access databases efficiently using built-in libdb support.

  7. Re:What about PocketLinux? by lizardo · · Score: 2

    one of my friends told me about the PocketLinux handhelds he saw at linuxworld. has anyone had a chance to see one at the conference? how does it compare to the vr agenda?

  8. LinuxWorld Webcasts by lamefrog · · Score: 3

    including Michael Dell keynote and Linux Geek Bowl, hosted by Nick Petreley, with, among others, Jeremy Allison, Larry Augustin, Miguel de Icaza, Jon 'maddog' Hall, Bruce Perens, Eric Raymond and Bob Young, available here . Includes MP3 versions.

  9. Re:what a tease... by dimator · · Score: 2

    Then again you'd be helping Billy G to get richer quick instead of Mr Dell. It's a bit of a double-edged sword, save $$$ or save your soul.............:>

    Or just buy a machine from someone else. I don't understand the big hoop-la over Dell machines, are they really that special? Can't one of the myriad of other makers produce similar quality systems?


    --

    --
    python -c "x='python -c %sx=%s; print x%%(chr(34),repr(x),chr(34))%s'; print x%(chr(34),repr(x),chr(34))"
  10. Those pictures by British · · Score: 2

    My ghod. I know the people in those pictures. The guy on the laptop on the ghetto microphones runs nerp.net. Talk about a small world. I never thought the Slashdot community would have the pleasure of seeing them all. Heh

    Scary.

  11. Re:What about PocketLinux? by Shotgun · · Score: 2

    My question is, "Will it display remote running X apps?"

    That is, can I attach a wireless networking card and then display Netscrape that's running on a remote server. Remember, many of us still have the goal or reading /. on the stool. (Garbage in...)

    Buying a complete notebook for this purpose is just too expensive and too bulky. An oversized IPaq with wireless networking would be the perfect fit for my problem space.

    --
    Aah, change is good. -- Rafiki
    Yeah, but it ain't easy. -- Simba
  12. what a tease... by tigrrl · · Score: 3

    Saw this in the second article mentioned:
    "But the chairman studiously avoided bad-mouthing Redmond, Wash., even when asked by an attendee why Dell systems preconfigured with Linux continued to be more expensive than similarly configured Windows machines."
    and thought I was about to get the official answer at last!

    No luck. I've been wondering for ages why the dell linux boxes are so much more expensive than the windows boxes. I thought they might be dealing with amortization of costs from the learning curve, but Dell also mentions in that article that they, themselves, are relying on linux boxes for several segments of their production process. My theory goes right out the window on that statement.

    Does anyone have a better idea? Or does anyone know what Dell actually responded to the question of why the linux boxes cost more?

    1. Re:what a tease... by 1alpha7 · · Score: 2

      I've been wondering for ages why the dell linux boxes are so much more expensive than the windows boxes.

      Most of the customers for Dell Linux servers are using them as the server and storage products . . . "We are spending more R&D dollars on Linux than any other OS, given its size," Dell said.
      That's their public statements; they are special, high end stuff. Crap, they just can't yet afford to piss off M$. And nothing pisses off the Redmond Illuminati more than cutting into their profits. As Linux starts to dominate the desktop, this will change. M$ will need Dell, Compaq, et al, as much as they need M$.

      As for installation hassle factor for Linux vs. Wondows, most people get their computers with the OS and major software pre-installed, with "restore" disks that neatly restore everything to day one in case of a screw-up, anyway. Dell knows this as much as any of us.

      --
      Live to be Moderated
    2. Re:what a tease... by Corty · · Score: 3
      Yeah I think it's the training costs, because MSCE's are everywhere compared to RHCE's. You have to remember DELL are still kinda new to the Linux game and so they are probably investing more $$$ in selling Linux boxes than they are getting back compared to M$ boxes.

      But hey if you really want to save that extra cash buy the one with M$ installed, delete the OS and start from scratch w/ Linux. Then again you'd be helping Billy G to get richer quick instead of Mr Dell. It's a bit of a double-edged sword, save $$$ or save your soul.............:>

      --
      mv /home/corty/sig.file /dev/null
  13. This could all be a fad by ibot · · Score: 2
    I mean the corporate interest in talking about it and showing support. Somewhat like the stock market infatuation with the Linux companies. This isn't to say that the user momentum or the development pace is going to decline anytime soon.

    Founder's Camp

    --

    Founder's Camp
    News for non-Nerds. Stuff that matters.

  14. Must-attend event for suits now by dsplat · · Score: 2

    Redherring has an interesting art icle saying that while Linuxworld is still a safe-haven for geeks, it has become a must-attend event for suits. My read of this is quite simple. They called us crazy, idealists, and starry-eyed optimists. They hoped we'd go away because we challenged the status quo. Now we can't be ignored. We've been right all along. Open source development works.

    --
    The net will not be what we demand, but what we make it. Build it well.
  15. Definitions by Elvis+Maximus · · Score: 2

    "Define 'old' without using the word 'young'."

    OLD: dating from the remote past; ANCIENT ("old traditions"); persisting from an earlier time ("an old ailment"), ("they brought up the same old argument"); of long standing ("an old friend")

    Define "Linux" without using the phrase, "It's not Microsoft".

    LINUX a free implementation of the UNIX computer operating system developed under a distributed, "open source" model

    Break out of the mold and do something truly creative.

    Why don't you? Isn't the whole point of open source that it empowers you to develop whatever you want? If you've got a great idea, share it with the rest of us.

    -

    --

    -
    Give me liberty or give me something of equal or lesser value from your glossy 32-page catalog.

    1. Re:Definitions by DrgnDancer · · Score: 2

      Hummm... Can you define Linux without the term UNIX? (i.e., in what way is Linux more than simply a rehash of a 30 year old idea?)
      I'm not flaming you. I'm just pointing out that immitation is an easy trap to fall into.

      I understand where you are going with this, but at the same time, I don't know that it is necesary to define Linux without using UNIX. When designing the OS, I see Linus as having two choices. He could develop a UI from scratch, which would have taken a very long time and detracted from what he proably saw as the real work of kernel implmentation. Or he could use the existing UNIX UI, most which was already written and just needed porting, and was small and simple as befits an OS "in development". It also had the advantage of being something that most of his fellow developers were familiar with. It is largely possible, in current distros of Linux, to ignore that UI. The members of the Gnome foundation would like to (I think) make it completely possible to ignore that UI. Linux is UNIX-like only insomuch as that was the interface Linus chose to bolt on. Look at Mac OS X. It is UNIX, yet I would not call it UNIX-like. The key here is to make Linux better. If that means borrowing from the good ideas of Microsoft, fine. If it means creating entirely new ideas, fine too. I am sure that if the members of the Gnome foundation intend to succeed, they will have to do both.

      --
      I don't need a million points of light, just two points of multi-mode fiber and a 10 Gig-E router.
  16. PocketLinux and jesse berst is an idiot by JimRay · · Score: 2

    I just want to publicly state what a complete idiot jesse berst is. I've never, EVER found a bit of worthwhile information in anything he's ever written. His opinions are nothing more than that, his opinions, and they are often wrong and backed by nothing more than his own ill-conceived speculation. We are all now dumber after reading any of the trash he writes.
    Now, to mobile linux. Most of the embedded stuff here at (a href="http://www.linuxworldexpo.com">LinuxWorld is alright. There is one stellar exception that stands above the crowd--PocketLinux. These guys rock! First of all, unlike some of the other guys, they're not putting a desktop linux distro in my hand. Do I want to run X on a screen that's 2" x 3"? Hell no. They've built an incredibly fast system that will display full motion video (that's right) on the Compaq iPaq. It's completely open source, and the framework is standards based and it appears to be easy to write your own applications on. It scales as well. Everything from a handheld to a cellular phone to a set-top box is possible. This is where the future of mobile linux is going to be. These guys finally did it right. Anyone else considering an embedded solution would do themselves a favor to look over there. And one final note, this product is SHIPPING TODAY! Yesterday even. This is not vapor ware. Spend the $150 and start developing apps today!

    --
    My other computer is your Windows box
  17. What a load of crap by Greyfox · · Score: 2
    Go looking for Microsoft everywhere and you will find them everywhere.

    Linux: It's UNIX, only better.

    --

    I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

  18. Linux wants to be Windows by MrShiny · · Score: 2

    "The Gnome desktop will integrate embedded Mozilla into the (Eazel) Nautilus file manager"

    Can somebody tell me why the Linux community openly criticizes Microsoft's silly ideas and then tries so hard to emulate them? It seems like Linux's inferiority complex is getting in the way of any real innovation on their part.

    1. Re:Linux wants to be Windows by Black+Parrot · · Score: 2

      > Can somebody tell me why the Linux community openly criticizes Microsoft's silly ideas and then tries so hard to emulate them?

      Perhaps because what you describe as "the Linux community" is actually multiple communities, some of which despise the MS way, while others admire it and others still don't give a flying flip.

      > It seems like Linux's inferiority complex is getting in the way of any real innovation on their part.

      Man, you really kicked the hell out of that straw man, didn't you.

      --

      --
      Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
    2. Re:Linux wants to be Windows by MrShiny · · Score: 2
      > Perhaps because what you describe as "the Linux community" is actually multiple communities, some of which despise the MS way,
      > while others admire it and others still don't give a flying flip.

      Quite true. In that case, I guess the communities I'm talking about here are the Mozilla and Nautilus developers. And while I do like some MS ideas, frankly the IE/shell integration is gimmicky and useless and I think most experienced computer users and the DoJ agree with me.

      I find it ironic that Mozilla is working on duplicating a feature that was only used originally by MS to shove them out of the market.

  19. Why DELL linux systems cost more by ry4an · · Score: 4

    I'd guess that the linux systems cost more because of the R&D costs involved whenever Dell upgrades an internal component is are spread out over a smaller number of systems. PC Builders don't actually _do_ much except promise you that the pieces they assemble work well with eachother and the OS they're installing (which is why Packard Bell should be considered the king of empty promises). Whenever they switch from Brand X floppy drives to brand XX floppy drives they have to test that hardware with the other components for a long while. When they do that on an NT platform they spread that cost out over the N systems they sell. With Linux it's spread out over the N/1000 systems they sell. As Linux grows in size it'll cost less (unless they pull the same scam the music industries did with the Cassette -> CD switch (wherein they promised higher CD costs initally and lower CD costs in the future)).
    --

    1. Re:Why DELL linux systems cost more by Saltheart · · Score: 2
      I'd guess that the linux systems cost more because of the R&D costs involved...

      I think that's a load of crap. If that were true then he would have used that argument each time the issue was brought up, but he knows that argument doesn't hold any water. Just look at the way he danced around the questions and how he ended up by spouting some bs about how you need to choose an OS with applications for the most value. What does that sound like to you?


      He may be flirting with Linux, but he's definitely still in bed with MS.

    2. Re:Why DELL linux systems cost more by Arandir · · Score: 2

      "I'd guess that the linux systems cost more because of the R&D costs involved"

      What the questioneer at the con didn't realize, even though Michael attempted to explain it, is that it really does cost them more to ship a Linux Dell computer than a Windows Dell computer.

      The reason why is simple. Ry4an explained it, but I'll rehash for the hard of hearing. Economy of scale. When you build 10,000 identical windows machines and 100 linux machines per day, the windows machines will each be cheaper to produce. Further, even the custom order machines get the same economy of scale, since creating 1000 identical custom orders for a windows machine still has a lower per-unit production cost than creating 10 identical custom orders for a linux machine.

      The questioneer called the extra $75 a "tax". If he would look this word up in a dictionary, he'll see that a tax is an involuntary obligation to a government or liege. If you don't want to spend $2000 + $75 for Linux Dell system, you have all the freedom in the world to buy a $2000 Windows Dell system and install Linux yourself, or even buy a $3000 VALinux system if you don't want to install the OS yourself.

      p.s. I do want to comment on another question asked of Michael Dell, and that is "aren't you just using Linux to sell more hardware?" The answer is of course, YES! Dell is a hardware company! Sheesh...

      --
      A Government Is a Body of People, Usually Notably Ungoverned
  20. Re:Hmmm by Mr.Phil · · Score: 2

    I disagree with your comment on how the base of Dell's business is the individual consumer. I spec for a college, and we shop dell. If we asked for 40 workstations with Linux on them, they'd hop alot quicker than one consumer asking for linux on a laptop. They have to offer the products where there's a demand for them, and the consumer market, like it or not, is still dominated by Windows PCs for game playing.

  21. agenda models by Icky · · Score: 2

    The VR3 looks moderately cool, but I'd like to take a look at the VR5.
    http://www.agendacomputing.com/sup port/faq06.jsp