Slashdot Mirror


Kenny Baker Will Be In Ep2

linderdm writes: "It looks like, once again, we have been subject to misinformation concerning Episode II. According to the Official Star Wars Web site, Kenny Baker will indeed be returning to act in Episode II, making him and Anthony Daniels (C-3PO), the only two actors to appear in all of the Star Wars movies to date." Good to hear that the old bit was just a nasty rumor.

18 of 126 comments (clear)

  1. Re:The nature of the rumors is the most interestin by Enoch+Root · · Score: 3
    To paraphrase Commander Rick from Prisonners of Gravity (although he was speaking of Star Trek, it still applies):

    "The old Star Wars movies were made despite the System. The new movies are made by the System."

  2. Oh my God... by Mtgman · · Score: 5

    They've resurrected Kenny! You bastards!

    Steven
    --

    --
    -- I have marked myself unwilling to moderate-- I don't have other accounts to artificially inflate the karma of
  3. These aren't the rumors... by Tyrannosaurus · · Score: 5
    These aren't the rumors you're looking for.

    These aren't the rumors we're looking for

    You can go about your business

    You can go about your business

    Move along.

    Move along.

    ---

    --

    ---
    Gort! Klatu Barata Nikto!
  4. Slashdot readers do it again... by SEE · · Score: 3

    Tom of Tom's Hardware writes a critical review of the 1.13 gigahertz Pentium III, and posters claim that there's no problem ("no other reviewers detected it") and slam Tom for anti-Intel bias. Tom is then proven right with an Intel recall, and Tom gets slammed with a "he might have been right, but he's biased anyway".

    George Lucas is denounced for cutting Kenny Baker out of Episode 2, and a whole series of posts come out denouncing Lucas. Then it is announced that Lucas isn't doing that, and it is touted as proof that Lucas is as evil as the previous denunciations said.

    Now, I'm not saying Tom isn't biased, or that Lucas isn't evil. But it does seem that there are people who are awfully eager to denounce others at the drop of a hat, and who don't have enough courage to admit that they were wrong...

    Steven E. Ehrbar

  5. Shame by Vanders · · Score: 4

    I'm actually quiet upset that Mr Lucas has choosen to go with Kenny after all. I mean, when i heard that he had done the sensible thing, and gone with CGI, i was really looking forward to EP:2. After, all, if it was anything as good as EP:1, it's going to be briliant!

    George Lucas should reconsider his decision not to use CGI for R2D2. It's not fair to abuse Kenny any farther by forcing him into that tiny costume to play a robot any more, when CGI can deliver the results much cheaper, and create a far more realistic looking robot than a costum ever could.

    Oh well, i can only hope George comes to his senses.

  6. Slashdot news by maggard · · Score: 5
    Slashdot Editorial Process:
    1. Read the inbox for geek-interest press-releases or rumors
    2. Post highest hit-rate-potential press-releases or rumors as 'news'
    3. Ignore previous iterations of exact same or reasonably similar postings
    4. Editorialize upon said rumors - note comments need be only marginally relevant and may contradict source material
    5. When caught out in a particularly egregious mistake make an addendum or simply recycle the correction as a new item some hours or days later
    Slashdot Discussion Process:
    • Post random messages regarding elves, libertarian politics, conspiracy theories, and actors
    • Attempt lame humor (it was funnier after a few hits in the dorm room)
    • Proudly state that you already invented this old chestnut yourself years ago but forgot to tell anyone or produce working code or finish all of the paperwork
    • Relate this to latest trendy SF novel or film ignoring or ignorent of their premise being as old as the genre
    • Comment how we don't need to hook up our toaster / blue-screen-of-death / MS is all inherent evil / anything Apple related is for goobers / usability is overhyped / pet OS or UI or chip or whatever does it better / what about insert-lame-ass-dead-project-thats-all-talk-here / linux is best / this doesn't work for linux folks / the site is slashdotted / it's a rumor secretly planted by the subject to increase buzz
    • Asume everyone reading /. is on your campus or town or region or country
    • *THE* law is US law and *THE* media is the TV programs you watch
    • Blithely assert bizarre statements are true 'in Europe' or other places that sound exotic
    • Post any other random thoughts you have no matter how irrelevant because it's *YOU* and everyone hangs on your every posting!
    --
    I don't read ACs: If a post isn't worth so much as a nom de plume to its author then I wont bother either.
  7. Slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5

    News for Nerds. Stuff that is unverified.

    1. Re:Slashdot by ackthpt · · Score: 3

      News for Nerds. Stuff that is unverified.

      You make it sound like a bad thing! ;-)

      N00zPH145h:
      Sir Alec Guiness' was cloned before he died. The clone, named Skippy, will appear in Ep3 with the shocking revelation that he is [a legal gnome slips in and attempts to serve a C&D, but to his utter embarrassment realizes this isn't an Apple leak and slips back out again] Han Solo's father's cousin's mother's hyperdrive mechanic's valet's kid brother's best friend's lawn bowling partner! Needless to say, this comes as a stunner to everyone, including Natalie Portman Sources close the story claim George Lucas vigorously denied this claim, retorting, "The clone's name is not Skippy, it's Fred!"

      Vote Naked 2000

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
  8. measuring geekiness in movies by jesterzog · · Score: 4

    making him and Anthony Daniels (C-3PO), the only two actors to appear in all of the Star Wars movies to date."

    I guess you can really judge the geekiness of a movie when the only two guys that have a social life are a couple of robots. :)


    ===
  9. "Horrible acting" in STAR WARS by hyacinthus · · Score: 3

    Young Anakin was annoying at times, yes, but I don't think it's entirely just to blame this on the "horrible acting" of Jake Lloyd. (Aside: am I the only one who thinks of another child actor, Danny Lloyd, _alias_ "Danny Torrance" from Kubrick's THE SHINING, when I see Jake Lloyd? They even look a bit the same. And some might say that young Danny was every bit as annoying as young Ani.)

    It's fashionable too to scorn Mark Hamill for his horrible acting, especially in A NEW HOPE; but is this entirely Hamill's fault? He was quite good in another film which appeared a few years later, Sam Fuller's THE BIG RED ONE; but then Sam Fuller was a better director by far than Lucas.

    And this, I think, is the problem. To get good performances from actors, good direction helps, a lot. A good director can flog a decent performance out of a mediocre actor (consider Ray Liotta in Scorsese's GOODFELLAS, or Ryan O'Neal in Kubrick's BARRY LYNDON--they're good in those movies, and forgettable in almost anything else.)

    George Lucas, though...consider, for example, Liam Neeson and Ewan McGregor in PHANTOM MENACE. Both have superb performances to their credits (e.g. SCHINDLER'S LIST for Neeson, TRAINSPOTTING for McGregor.) But, if you'd seen these actors for the first time in PHANTOM MENACE, would you have seen _anything_ which suggested that they had great talent? Hardly! I can only conjecture that so uninspiring was Lucas's direction that Neeson and McGregor didn't feel themselves called upon to expend more than the minimum effort needed to act out their parts.

    And now I'm remembering Hamill's words to the effect that if Lucas could make movies without actors, he would. I suspect that Lucas doesn't really know _how_ to direct actors, perhaps feels uncomfortable doing so; he'd rather play with computer graphics. It's not just the creation of fully animated characters like the androids or Jar Jar; if the IMDb is to be believed, Lucas also resorted to computerized "directing" (altering Natalie Portman's voice electronically, altering which way Jake Lloyd's eyes looked in a particular scene. And need I mention the alterations to the "Special Editions"?)

    I'm a little saddened. STAR WARS holds a special place in my heart, all the more so because I'm a latecomer to it (I first saw all three films, in their entirety, only upon the theatrical release of the Special Editions.) But THE PHANTOM MENACE left me with little hope for the second and third films. I'm pinning my big-budget fantasy-film dreams to Peter Jackson's LORD OF THE RINGS movies :]

    Hyacinthus

  10. The nature of the rumors is the most interesting by Enoch+Root · · Score: 3
    With rumors like that, regardless of whether they're true or not, the fascinating aspect is what makes it spread around like wildfire.

    Consider some of the rumors floating around before Episode 1: the one that stuck up the most was that Lucas considered using a digital version of Sir Alec Guinness to play the young Obi-Wan. The fact the rumor spread around meant that people were excited at the upcoming special effects and dreamed of wild innovations.

    Now, post-Episode 1, we get rumors that even R2D2 will receive an unwanted CGI facelift. This goes to show that people are now jaded of SW special effects, and fear the movies are losing their dimension of humanity.

    By extension, these rumors then expose the bias a particular news source. How often do you see positive rumors about Episode 2, lately? What about the comments themselves?

  11. Re:Slashdot should be changed from by vulgrin · · Score: 3

    I'm really confused about this whole "blacklash on slashdot" recently. People complaining that news items don't fit THEIR ideals for "news for nerds" or that Slashdot occasionally posts something that is wrong.

    First off, we "Nerds" are a pretty diverse group. Therefore your idea of "news" may not be the same as my idea of "news." If you are that pissed off about it, then DON'T READ THE TOPIC, let alone reply to it. It always amazes me how out of the way people go to make themselves and others around them miserable.

    Second, tell me if I'm wrong, but Slashdot is NOT an associated press. They produce news items based on submitted postings and interesting tidbits that they find. So if anyone is to blame on the content, blame yourselves. And if you don't go as far to submit a story to /. then don't complain about the content. If you want the content to be more "nerdy" then submit something. /. is NOT CNN, it is a COMMUNITY. I don't go to /. because I think they've checked all of the facts. (face it, even major world-wide news organizations cannot check their facts first, and if you think differently, why don't you try it out?)

    Of course, I'm being a hypocrite just by posting this, but I gotta vent my frustrations that have been building up for the past month. Sorry.

    Vulgrin the MAD

    --
    I sig, therefore I am.
  12. Truth somewhere in the middle? by jalefkowit · · Score: 5

    Judging from the story on starwars.com, it's not entirely clear whether Lucas is 100% disavowing this rumor or not. Take a close look at Lucas' exact words:

    "The robotics technology inside the Artoo models have advanced to the point where they can achieve most of the performance I need right along side the other actors. Still, there's an element of humanity to Artoo that comes from having Kenny Baker inside. We've always had Kenny scheduled for a number of shots during the final week of shooting at Elstree Studios."

    Lucas certainly isn't enthusiastically stating that only Kenny Baker can play R2D2. It sounds to me like Lucas is saying that most of the R2D2 shots can be done with robotic technology; he just wants Kenny to come in for a few specific shots that, for whatever reason, the robotics can't handle. (I'll leave speculation as to whether this is due to technical limitations or to avoid looking publicly like he was dumping Kenny Baker as an exercise for the reader.)

    Truth be told, for all the to-do about this story, my sentiments are mixed. While Baker made a great R2D2, Terry Gilliam makes a great point in his commentary track on the Criterion Collection DVD of Time Bandits , which Baker starred in. He says that it's a shame that actors like Baker are forced by their height to spend their lives playing robots and Ewoks, hidden under costume and makeup, rather than playing actual human beings who just happen to be shorter than most. Something worth thinking about while we all wring our hands over whether Kenny gets to spend a week in a robot suit.


    -- Jason A. Lefkowitz

  13. Dammit Slashdot by bfree · · Score: 3

    let this be a lesson to you! Next time when checking for valid information...USE THE SOURCE!
    And remind that Kurt the debian reviewer while your at it :-)

    --

    Never underestimate the dark side of the Source

  14. Robo World Cup by TeVi · · Score: 4

    Cool! Will he appear in Robo World Cup as well now?

  15. Recipe for R2D2: by Lonesmurf · · Score: 5

    CGI Version:

    o 1 part Cylinder,
    o 1 part Sphere,
    o Various Cubes,
    o 1 part Chees-O(tM) blue and white random splotch texture map

    Instructions -

    1. Place Sphere on Cylinder.
    2. Place Cylinder and sphere on Rectangles
    3. Place Chees-O(tM) blue and white random splotch texture map on everything.
    4. Hit Frapee!

    Real life Version

    o 1 part trashcan
    o 1 part dome-thingy
    o Various size shoeboxes
    o VerySmallMan(tM) (note that midgets don't work in this recipe)
    o Silver and light blue spray paint.
    o Duct tape. Lots and lots of duct tape.

    Instructions:

    1. Place VerySmallMan(tM) in trashcan and place dome on top of trashcan. Seal with duct tape. Ignore ear shattering screams from VerySmallMan. Yes, he can breath, you did punch holes in the trashcan, right? RIGHT?
    2. Duct tape shoe boxes to trashcan.
    3. Spray paint.
    4. Frapee!

    Rami
    --

  16. Nitpick, but... by mblase · · Score: 3
    ...making him and Anthony Daniels (C-3PO), the only two actors to appear in all of the Star Wars movies to date.

    Isn't that a bit of a misnomer? After all, neither Kenny Baker nor Anthony Daniels actually appeared in either movie. Anthony wasn't even physically in Episode I, either, for that matter, just his voice.

  17. More from the George Lucas rumor mill by Jon+Erikson · · Score: 5

    Why are people here naive enough to actually believe anything they hear about the next Star Wars movie? It seems blatently obvious that all of these rumours are being put about deliberately by Lucas and co. just to drum up extra interest in the film without paying for it.

    After all, he's already shown how little he cares for the people that buy his films with his DVD and "special edition" video policy, so what's a bit of public manipulation to him? Just ignore the hype, go see the film if you have to (it must be nice having fans that will go no matter how crap the film is) and then realise that it's another massively overhyped CGI-driven movie for ten year old kids with no tolerance for a plot.

    ---
    Jon E. Erikson

    --

    Jon Erikson, IT guru