Slashdot Mirror


Cray for Sale - Cheap - Some Assembly Required

"For quick sale: Supercomputer of distinguished pedigree, a CRAY Y-MP C90, one of the world's most powerful only seven short years ago, an extremely reliable workhorse for R&D computing. Get the jump on your competitors! Bring this black & gold beauty home to your research center or lab today!" Read the story or place your bid. ... If you've ever wanted to go to the top of the distributed.net stats, here's your chance.

16 of 152 comments (clear)

  1. Showdown: Cray Y-MP vs. Penguin Computing Server by Dr.+Zowie · · Score: 4
    For a few moments I seriously considered that my lab might want this beast -- we do a fair amount of computing on a Beowulf cluster now, and I'm anticipating more need for cycles in years to come. But even at the opening price of $35,000, the machine doesn't compete well with commodity workstations anymore.

    I went over to Penguin Computing and priced their eight-Pentium-III rackmount server with all the trimmings. It came to $70,000 for a system that comes surprisingly close to the Cray in power.

    The Penguin Computing system has 8 Pentium III 550 MHz processors (with 1MB L2 cache each). If you were buying a real system, you'd probably try to use the much nicer Athlon series, but you'd certainly get something closer to a gigahertz from either AMD or Intel. Either processor has multiple pipelines, so you're likely to get more than 1 FLOPS per MHz of processor speed in optimized applications. You could expect perhaps 0.6 - 1.2 GFLOP per processor with this system, or 1-2 GFLOP with a system that used higher clock speed (Athlons might deliver higher pipelining multipliers?). Multiply by eight processors, and you find you should be able to expect 10-16 GFLOPS out of the rackmount server. The Penguin Computing machine has a fully cross-linked bus, so RAM bus contention is probably about equally problematic between the two machines. The PC machine has 2GB of memory (compared to the Cray Y-MP's 4GB), but this may be extensible (at ~2K/GB). The Magnus has dual 75GB hard drives, easily matching the Cray's disk space, but it also has a gigabit fiber link and a kickass graphics card, which the Cray lacks.

    So the rackmount Magnus system offers comparable performance to the Cray, at twice the initial bid for the Cray (a reasonable estimate for the final price).

    Now let's consider additional costs. The Cray requires that unspecified pieces of paper be signed to satisfy the U.S. government, adding unknown bureaucratic cost. The Magnus does not. Shipping and installing the Cray will require thousands of dollars. The Magnus requires about a hundred dollars. The Cray requires special power and a cooling system. The Magnus dissipates about a kilowatt and hence can get by with an extra HVAC vent. It does notrequire special power. The Magnus, dissipating about 1kW of power, would require perhaps $60/month for electricity; the Cray, with at least a factor of 10 more power, requires at least $600/month (plus the added cost of cooling the dinosaur pen).

    So the Cray sounds fun to get, but (surprise!) it just doesn't stack up once the inconvenience factor is added in.

    I suppose I shouldn't be surprised. Even an I-Opener is in the same ballpark these days as a VAX 11/785 -- at least for memory and raw FLOPS.

  2. Re:Sieze the power. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5

    Hi, I actually work at PSC (the group selling the system) and I have to say its a damn fine computer. You should all buy one now. Seriously though, this is not a linux box and the possibility of porting linux to it would be a daunting (if not impossible) task. I'm also not sure that the current set of licenses for the OS and other tools found on the machine are transferable. You'd also have a devil of a time installing this. The power requirements are outstanding. Not only do you have to deal with the power draw, cooling issues, wireing issues and so forth... You would also need to rewrite most any program you wanted to run on the sucker if you wanted it to use the full capabilities of the machine. How handy are y'all with FORTRAN? And yes, there is a good chunk of precious metals in this box in the work of wiring and connectors. It would cost much more to extract them then the value of the metals. And no, we can't ship this outside of the United States and I don't know about any restrictions on sales to foreign nationals. Lastly... Quake? What the hell are you smoking?

  3. Hope you have your own power plant by Dhrakar · · Score: 3

    We used to have a Cray Y-MP where I work... One little detail that has not yet been mentioned is that a Y-MP is water cooled. So, anyone without their own heat exchange unit and/or chilled water suppy need not apply ;-) Also, the thing used about $20,000 of electricity every month. Yipes!

  4. man... by nomadic · · Score: 4

    Imagine a Beowu--ok, I'll stop.
    --

  5. Having a Cray gets you a discount on power by CoderDevo · · Score: 4

    Actually, you are right, you do get a wholesale rate. Part of the requirements of running one or more Crays, as I have done, is to have sufficient backup power. We had 12 battery backup units, each with 32 car batteries. That would keep the Crays running for 4 minutes. After that the 3 12-cylinder deisel engines would be running at full speed and supply power endlessly.

    When we had hot days in Minnesota, the local power company would call us and ask us to switch to deisel power so they could use their energy to power everyone else's air conditioners. In return, we got a major discount on power.

    Note: the 4 story building takes up a whole block, but has no furnace. Even in the dead of a Minnesota winter, the Crays heated the whole building including the indoor parking ramp...and we still needed to vent heat out via fans.

  6. Re:Linux on AS/400 is coming by Cato · · Score: 3

    Xunker is right, if you have a RISC-based AS/400, i.e. a modern one, it is using PowerPC under the hood.

    IBM has recently committed to porting Linux to the AS/400 platform (not to OS/400, the operating system) - this will be done very much the same way they already ported AIX, i.e. you'll have Linux running directly on the PowerPC hardware, with some extra software to arbitrate between OS/400 and Linux where needed, and handle Linux-OS/400 communications.

    Should be very interesting when it's all done - every single IBM platform, including the most proprietary AS/400 and S/390 ranges, will be able to run Linux apps, and porting should be relatively easy providing apps are not byte order dependent etc.

    Ironically, IBM tried in the 80s and 90s to provide a way of easily porting apps across all its different OSs and architectures, through a set of development tools and APIs known as System Application Architecture (SAA). They failed. It would be rather cool if Linux solved this problem for them :)

  7. Re:Sieze the power. by jlg · · Score: 5
    We could have the first community-owned supercomputer. Imagine the possibilities...

    Well this is kind of a good idea, but you will be happy to know that it has already been done.

    The US government spends millions of dollars on supercomputers every year. Some of the computers are for Classified projects, but many of them are for research purposes. These research computers are like a national computing resource. You paid the tax money for them and, if you're so inclined, you can probably use them. If you think you have a project that would benefit from a supercomputer, you can apply for time on one.

    If you buy your own Cray you'll be guaranteed time on it, but you'll also be burdened with maintenance and upgrades.

    Try these links:

    NPACI Allocations

    www.sdsc.edu

    www.ncsa.edu

  8. Someone did by Felinoid · · Score: 3

    Ok not thies... but the much older Cray 2s... back when they were new and such a setup did not yet exist.

    War Games.... The computer in the book was 7 Cray 2s.. They scaled it down to one larg black box in the movie...
    (I guess the tech of 7 Cray 2s wouldn't impress the non-tech movie going public... my mother thought it was some sort of joke to use one larg black box sence she recognised it as a mini-mainframe.. she not being any sort of tech felt anyone would recognise this if she could.)

    Anyway... Yes someone accually thought of doing a cluster of Crays... a bit before anyone accually made such a system...

    Now imagin Wopr going HAL and trying to pull a Forben project...

    --
    I don't actually exist.
  9. Original cost = 30.5M by cheshire_cqx · · Score: 5

    According to this article the original cost of a Cray Y-MP C90 was $30.5 million.

    Some specs from utk.edu :

    • 4.1 ns Clock Cycle
    • 15.6 Gflops/s maximal
    • 16 GB main memory
    • 12 GB/s single proc. memory bandwith
    • 2-16 processors

    Apparently, today's fastest supercomputers are at about 12.3 teraflops! Still, I bet the power bill on the C90 still packs a punch! (But at least you won't need a heater in the winter!)

    ---
    In a hundred-mile march,

  10. Ever _used_ a C-90? by plambert · · Score: 5

    I ran the original distributed.net RC5 client on one CPU of an 8-cpu C-90. It got about 85Kkeys/sec. Yes, that's _85_. Not 600+ like intel processors of the time get.

    C-90's do vectors. They don't do integer work. vi? slow as a dog. emacs? slow as a dog. CFD simulations? it'll knock your socks off.

    Most people were very surprised when they would log in and see how _slow_ it was running a shell. Think 2-3 seconds to get a response to the 'date' command.

    Would you use a sprint car to go to the grocery store? Wouldn't get you there any faster than my Geo Metro, would it?

    C-90's are incredible machines; the details would fill you with awe. But given that there's no hardware documentation available, and hence no OS's other than COS and Unicos for them, and limitations like _no MMU_, it's really only useful for batch processing of vector work, i.e. floating point.

    It'd make a kick-ass rendering back-end, if you could get someone to write the software. Otherwise, leave it alone.

    --plambert

  11. This or an SGI? by jsmaby · · Score: 3

    It looks like this would be about comparable to your average O2000 SGI. These systems go for a lot more than 35k. The problem is that research grants take much longer than 5 days to go through, and even if 100k was allocated for an SGI, the department can't just change the wording of the grant. Also, research departments like to get thier hardware from official sources. Getting something on Ebay would be considered a gamble, and one doesn't gamble with 35k of thier research group's money. I don't think ebay is the right medium to sell this system. It will probably be bought privately for much less than it's worth.

    --

    Sometimes I've believed as many as six impossible things before breakfast.

  12. I'll buy if.. by BLiP2 · · Score: 5

    There real question here is, does the seller except payment by paypal? ;)

    --
    Vote Technocratic! Government by killer robots!
  13. Re:Why buy CRAY when you can have a G4? by fgodfrey · · Score: 4
    This is the same kind of comment that pops up every time there's an article talking about real supercomputers. The big difference is that you will *never* see 3 gigaflops on a G4 outside of some specialized benchmark. When you're on a real Cray, you're usually striding through so much data that the processor cache is totally useless (vector Crays before the SV1 [or maybe the J90] didn't have a cache). That means that you fall back on the bandwidth of the memory bus, which was not designed for memory references on almost every clock cycle.

    In addition, the Cray is going to push a lot more stuff between disk and memory than that G4. Not important? Well, try dealing with several hundred gigabyte files constantly and disk performance becomes an issue.

    Basically, the Cray is designed to run at or near peak performance constantly. The G4 (and all other personal computers) are not.

    Also, it takes 8 G4's to equal a Cray from 1991. That's pretty good for an almost 10 year old machine...

    --
    Go Badgers! -- #include "std/disclaimer.h"
  14. I only want to know one thing... by meckardt · · Score: 3

    Does it run Seti-At-Home?


    Gonzo
  15. Re:I'd buy it.... by phish+junkie · · Score: 3

    The Cray could be your dorm room.. With the fans that thing must have, you'd always have cold beer around. And when chicks hear of your 16 gigaflops, they'll be lining up.

  16. Re:Why buy CRAY when you can have a G4? by jlg · · Score: 3

    Maybe the G4 can theoretically achieve 2 gigaflops, but I challenge you to prove it to me on a useful application. I'd be proud of you if you could get 25% of that number.

    The main reason you would want this instead of a G4 is that it's memory is much faster than a G4's. The C90's main memory (4GB) is like your G4's cache (not 4GB) in terms of speed. Even when your faithful CPU meter reads "100%", your CPU is often idle. It has to sit and wait for memory requests which take quite a while. The cache can only do so much.

    It is true that this C90 is getting old and most of them have probably been decommissioned. However, I am sure that there are still C90's out there in use and they can't be replaced by Macs.