Wireless Broadband?
kishi asks: "My office needs to ditch 7 dedicated phone lines and 7 dial-up ISP accounts. Roadrunner (which I use at home) isn't available and two different DSL networks have told us 'yesnomaybe'. It has been 'yesnomaybe' for 11 weeks and we're still paying $175 for dial-up access. Hyperoam offers wireless broadband. Do any of you Slashdotters out there have any experiences (good, bad or indifferent) with it? I need more information on wireless broadband before I take the plunge and get rid of something that works for something that might not."
> I need more information on wireless broadband
> before I take the plunge and get rid of
> something that works for something that might
> not.
I don't know anything about the wireless broadband stuff, but I can offer you some very good if very obvious advice - DONT GET RID OF WHAT YOU'VE GOT UNTIL YOU'RE *SURE* THAT THE NEW STUFF WORKS.
If you've already waited 11 weeks, keeping the old dialup around a few more weeks after you change (if you do) won't (I hope) kill you...
0.02,
Mike.
Tales from behind the Lagom Curtain
Please note: I run a regional semi-rural ISP - we do this kind of work every day.
The trick with wireless broadband is usually that you are in an area that is seen as "unfashionable" to the large regionals and nationals.
Find yourself a local ISP - somebody that has some bandwidth and a bit of a DIY attitude. The gear to provide a point to point 2mb connection including antenna, cable, lightning arrestor, radio and short mast is less than $1000. The demarcation on both ends is ethernet. Note that you do need visual and radio line of sight as this gear doesn't go around corners well. Here's a good shopping list / procedure guide:
This will give you serious net connectivity at a very reasonable price (compared to a telco T1, you'd see payback within about 2 weeks) in a way that is easy for both the ISP and you to deal with.
Here's the connection sequence starting from the ISP running to you:
At your end, follow the same instructions, just add the linksys in as a NAT connection between your network and the public IP you got from the ISP.
There are a few other little tips and tricks - if anyone needs help, email me.
There are other product offerings that will work just as well, but only the teletronics gear is this cheap and has been field proven in this kind of environment with no 'engineering' assistance.
For a good topical discussion on this, join-isp-wireless@isp-wireless.com be careful though, this is a high volume list.
Most of what you need can be had from www.wpcs.com or www.tessco.com.
Actually, are you sure broadband is the way to go? Right now you have seven dialup accounts, at a cost of $175 per month. While not cheap, broadband may end up being more expensive.
It sounds like what you have is seven "business" dialups. In the broadband industry, providers charge extreme fees for installation and monthly charges, just because you are a business - not much is different between @Home and @Work - just some wording in the contract (and possibly better service when you need it). I am certain DSL is the same way.
Are there any landline based solutions? Could you do a "bonded" dialup or maybe ISDN? Will your downlink bandwidth needs be greater than your uplink - or vice-versa (ie, will you be surfing more, or will you be running servers - or do you want to do both)? If you are doing surfing mostly, with only an occasional upload to update your website being hosted by another provider, ISDN or a bonded dialup (or maybe some kind of 56K lease line setup), using NAT on the backend and a firewall - may be a good option.
Make sure there isn't a landline option available to you, before deciding completely on wireless. I am not saying wireless is a bad thing (in fact, I think it is one of the cooler techs on the market), just that you should look at all possible options.
I support the EFF - do you?
Reason is the Path to God - Anon
the other guy said, is wireless broadband (or even broadband) the way to go? An ISDN or leased line can be had for a decent price and are usually pretty available. You can maximize bandwidth by putting a NAT server between you and the internet with cache'ing set so you only need to download the bare minimum of a page's components. Another option is to use something like DirecPC which has a fair downstream bandwidth but is limited to your modem upload speed (and severe latency). The drawbacks to all of these is a high initial cost (networking equipment and wiring along with ISDN/Leased line charges) but I think it is still more affordable than wireless broadband. Wireless just isn't "here" in quality and quantity that would make it a real option in my opinion.
I'm a loner Dottie, a Rebel.