Slashdot Mirror


NASA To Contact Its Oldest Spacecraft

BugBBQ writes: "This is very "Space:1999 UltraProbe" kinda-kool... NASA will attempt to contact its oldest spacecraft, Pioneer-6, launched in 1965! (yikes! that's the year I was born for crying out loud! which I'm sure I did at the time)). p.s.: Anyone who gets the Space:1999 ref is welcome to e-mail me" This bird has been spinning through space for a long time.

14 of 111 comments (clear)

  1. Too bad it doesn't run Linux by i_hate_windows · · Score: 3

    Could you imagine the uptime!!

    uptime 12764 days, 04:25, 1 user

  2. Re:Far Out by sconeu · · Score: 3
    You're mixing up two different probes...

    Pioneer 6 is in solar orbit at 0.74 AU

    Pioneer 10 has left the solar system, and is 7 billion miles away

    --
    General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
  3. An additional small piece of info by bbay · · Score: 3

    The article doesn't mention this, so in case anyone was wondering. The last time this spacecraft was contacted was in October of 1997.

  4. Re:ping... by nitehawk214 · · Score: 3
    /*
    * [...] Note that 120 sec is defined in the protocol as the maximum
    * possible RTT. I guess we'll have to use something other than TCP
    * to talk to the University of Mars. * PAWS allows us longer timeouts and large windows, so once implemented
    * ftp to mars will work nicely.
    */


    - from /usr/src/linux/net/inet/tcp.c, concerning RTT [round trip time]
    --
    I'm a good cook. I'm a fantastic eater. - Steven Brust
  5. Re:7 billion light years by Hard_Code · · Score: 4

    Yes, but we know that time travel can be achieved by attaining the exact speed of 88 mph (plus a flux capacitor)...so maybe we launched it yesterday, it went back 7 billion years in time, and now we are just trying to contact it.

    --

    It's 10 PM. Do you know if you're un-American?
  6. Re:What hardware is it running? by Prof_Dagoski · · Score: 3

    NASA is open about such things, but based on my experience with the UARS satellite, much of the protocols were one shot solutions applicable only to the particular mission or mission family. If the thing's still up and running you've got a good shot of getting everything on the web. However, if it's been shut down for more than a couple of years, they probably tossed the binders containing the documentation. That was a big problem even on a working project like HRDI and UARS were during the early 90s. Namely it had been running for a several years already, the software was getting long in the tooth and it needed updating. A lot of my job was tweaking legacy code to to bring it in line with language updates and whatnot. Its really frustrating to be able to find no documentation whatsoever on a critical piece of running code. And, thats from the programmer's point of view. I don't wanna think about ther operations engineers would have done if they had to restart it. Anyway, searching for lost documentation would be an original science history project. It'd also be fun to go through the old software archives and take a peek at the code. Mind you for something this old who knows how its stored--punch cards? It kinda gives the creeps to know that someday a historian may draw an image of me based solely on a bunch kludgy Fortran 66 and VAX DCL programs.

  7. NASA by twodogs · · Score: 3

    What are they going to say? "Ground Control To Major Tom"

  8. What hardware is it running? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3

    As any geek would be, I would be interested to know what kind of hardware was used to build that thing, especially considering when it was built. I also wonder what the protocol is used to download data from the spacecraft, doubt anyone would know, except NASA people, considering it would be proprietary.

    "...originally launched on what was to have been a fleeting six-month mission to measure the solar wind, solar magnetic field and cosmic rays."

    My additional question is what practical use it's information would have today, with all the monitoring equipment we have on Earth and have sent into orbit. Keep in mind it does have the advantage of not being obstructed by Earth's weather nor any other Earthly obstructions because it's in a solar oribt.

    1. Re:What hardware is it running? by lemox · · Score: 5

      There's not a whole lot of info on Pioneer 6, but what is you can find is here and here.

      Pioneer 10 is the sexier of ventures, since it's now the furthest away, and therefore gets more attention.

      --

      "We obviously need a new moderation category: (-1, Woo-fucking-hoo)" --Mr. AC

  9. ping... by glgraca · · Score: 4

    ping -i 36667

  10. Usefull Data. by HiyaPower · · Score: 5

    Some of these older space probes are still producing useful data. Check out Mit's Space Plasma web page. Voyager 2 is alive and well and producing data which is being actively studied. It should be passing the heliopause soon and then really be out beyond the system. Its hard to keep interest and funding up for these old guys, but it is well worth the effort.

  11. used to calibrate SETI by peter303 · · Score: 3

    The other pioneers 10 & 11 faint signals are used
    to test SETI equipment. I recall one of the two
    becoming undetectable recently.

  12. 7 billion light years by rjh · · Score: 4

    If it's seven billion light years away, then that might explain why my pings to it always timeout. :)

    (I think you meant seven billion here, not seven billion light years. One LY = 6 trillion miles/9 trillion KM, if I recall correctly. I really, really doubt that Pioneer 10 is 63 billion trillion KM away.)

  13. Ah, but . . . by Selanit · · Score: 3

    . . . . what NASA doesn't realize is that the aliens have now intercepted the probe and are using it as a coffee table. Any data returned are the result of spilled coffee, or alien equivalent thereof. :-)